Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Position-Finding

September, 2010

Index includes 370 messages. Sorted by message ID, in descending order.
SubjectAuthorDate (UT)SizeID
Re: Magnetic variation near BermudaJeremy C30 Sep 2010, 16:387606g14070
Magnetic variation near BermudaJohn H30 Sep 2010, 16:236089g14069
Small Craft Compass CheckGreg Rudzinski30 Sep 2010, 15:457907g14068
Re: Graphs of Lunar Distances.Douglas Denny29 Sep 2010, 21:3340056g14067
Re: Graphs of Lunar Distances.Douglas Denny29 Sep 2010, 18:3116304g14066
Re: Graphs of Lunar Distances.Douglas Denny29 Sep 2010, 10:235885g14065
Re: Graphs of Lunar Distances.Frank Reed29 Sep 2010, 06:3626946g14064
Re: Graphs of Lunar Distances.Gary LaPook29 Sep 2010, 05:2110991g14063
Re: Graphs of Lunar Distances.Frank Reed29 Sep 2010, 02:0327791g14062
Re: Graphs of Lunar Distances.Frank Reed29 Sep 2010, 00:019252g14061
Re: Graphs of Lunar Distances.Douglas Denny28 Sep 2010, 23:468115g14060
Re: Graphs of Lunar Distances.Douglas Denny28 Sep 2010, 22:09312830g14059
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DByron Franklin28 Sep 2010, 13:24229024g14058
Re: The clock which keeps time to within 1 second in about 3.7billion yearsPeter Fogg27 Sep 2010, 22:2317373g14057
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DByron Franklin27 Sep 2010, 21:067386g14056
The clock which keeps time to within 1 second in about 3.7 billion yearsPeter Fogg27 Sep 2010, 07:315790g14055
Re: Benefits of StigmatizingGeorge Huxtable26 Sep 2010, 18:326373g14054
Re: Benefits of StigmatizingDouglas Denny26 Sep 2010, 17:417871g14053
Re: MA1 aircraft sextant averagerGary LaPook26 Sep 2010, 16:526608g14052
Re: Benefits of StigmatizingGeorge Huxtable26 Sep 2010, 16:336935g14051
Re: Benefits of StigmatizingDouglas Denny26 Sep 2010, 12:47530911g14050
Re: Benefits of StigmatizingDouglas Denny26 Sep 2010, 11:487305g14049
MA1 aircraft sextant averagerBill Morris26 Sep 2010, 06:116293g14048
Re: Accuracy of sextant observations at seaGreg Rudzinski25 Sep 2010, 23:445720g14047
Re: Accuracy of sextant observations at seaByron Franklin25 Sep 2010, 23:2610060g14046
Re: Benefits of StigmatizingGeorge Huxtable25 Sep 2010, 22:595987g14045
Re: A-12 Bubble Sextant (Octant)Jean-Philippe Planas25 Sep 2010, 18:548556g14044
Re: A-12 Bubble Sextant (Octant)Geoffrey Kolbe25 Sep 2010, 10:205806g14043
Re: A-12 Bubble Sextant (Octant)Jean-Philippe Planas25 Sep 2010, 08:0775263g14042
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DGary LaPook25 Sep 2010, 02:087621g14041
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DByron Franklin25 Sep 2010, 01:336751g14040
Re: Did the Titanic helmsman turn the wrong way?/ OTHER CASES !Alan S24 Sep 2010, 21:235562g14039
Re: Teaching Astronomy and Celestial Navigation.Alan S24 Sep 2010, 21:085483g14038
Re: Did the Titanic helmsman turn the wrong way?/ OTHER CASES !Irv Haworth24 Sep 2010, 18:168474g14037
Re: Teaching Astronomy and Celestial Navigation.Tom Sult24 Sep 2010, 16:5114475g14036
Teaching Astronomy and Celestial Navigation.Byron Franklin24 Sep 2010, 16:251814803g14035
Re: Azimuths, WAS: Accuracy of sextant observations at seaJeremy C24 Sep 2010, 14:0910223g14034
Re: Azimuths, WAS: Accuracy of sextant observations at seaAlan S24 Sep 2010, 04:426601g14033
Azimuths, WAS: Accuracy of sextant observations at seaPeter Hakel23 Sep 2010, 23:448133g14032
Re: Accuracy of sextant observations at seaGreg Rudzinski23 Sep 2010, 23:436220g14031
Re: Degree symbol inputPeter Fogg23 Sep 2010, 22:536863g14030
Re: Did the Titanic helmsman turn the wrong way?Jeremy C23 Sep 2010, 21:489537g14029
Re: Accuracy of sextant observations at seaJeremy C23 Sep 2010, 21:389389g14028
Re: Accuracy of sextant observations at seaGary LaPook23 Sep 2010, 20:2413016g14027
Re: Degree symbol inputGary LaPook23 Sep 2010, 20:217959g14026
Re: Accuracy of sextant observations at seaGary LaPook23 Sep 2010, 20:198080g14025
Re: Degree symbol inputGreg Rudzinski23 Sep 2010, 20:107111g14024
Re: Degree symbol inputGary LaPook23 Sep 2010, 20:058248g14023
Re: Accuracy of sextant observations at seaGreg Rudzinski23 Sep 2010, 19:476112g14022
Re: Did the Titanic helmsman turn the wrong way?Geoffrey Kolbe23 Sep 2010, 19:026075g14021
Re: Accuracy of sextant observations at seaJeremy C23 Sep 2010, 18:5610243g14020
Re: A-12 Bubble Sextant (Octant)Douglas Denny23 Sep 2010, 18:4310683g14019
Re: A-12 Bubble Sextant (Octant)Jean-Philippe Planas23 Sep 2010, 18:298762g14018
Re: A-12 Bubble Sextant (Octant)Peter Hollings23 Sep 2010, 17:436458g14017
Re: Jupiter Lunar DSLR Camera TrialGreg Rudzinski23 Sep 2010, 17:13192441g14016
Re: Degree symbol inputGeorge Huxtable23 Sep 2010, 16:198183g14015
Re: Degree symbol inputPeter Hakel23 Sep 2010, 16:079300g14014
Re: Degree symbol inputGeorge Huxtable23 Sep 2010, 15:417360g14013
Re: Degree symbol inputAntoine Couëtte23 Sep 2010, 15:239206g14012
Re: Accuracy of sextant observations at seaGeorge Huxtable23 Sep 2010, 15:151962819g14011
Re: Accuracy of sextant observations at seaJohn Brown23 Sep 2010, 12:206368g14010
Re: Graphs of Lunar Distances.George Huxtable23 Sep 2010, 11:3216756g14009
Accuracy of sextant observations at seaGary LaPook23 Sep 2010, 09:579727g14008
Re: Jupiter Lunar DSLR Camera TrialMarcel Tschudin23 Sep 2010, 09:447946g14007
Re: Graphs of Lunar Distances.Douglas Denny23 Sep 2010, 07:337283g14006
Re: Did the Titanic helmsman turn the wrong way?Douglas Denny23 Sep 2010, 07:238463g14005
Re: A-12 Bubble Sextant (Octant)John Brown23 Sep 2010, 06:485693g14004
Re: A-12 Bubble Sextant (Octant)Jean-Philippe Planas23 Sep 2010, 05:5712779g14003
Re: A-12 Bubble Sextant (Octant)Bill Morris23 Sep 2010, 05:577752g14002
A-12 Bubble Sextant (Octant)John Brown22 Sep 2010, 21:098279g14001
Re: Did the Titanic helmsman turn the wrong way?Peter Fogg23 Sep 2010, 04:4213832g14000
Jupiter Lunar DSLR Camera TrialGreg Rudzinski23 Sep 2010, 04:177171g13999
Re: Degree symbol inputGuy Schwartz23 Sep 2010, 03:389010g13998
Re: Degree symbol inputPaul Hirose23 Sep 2010, 01:536928g13997
Graphs of Lunar Distances.Douglas Denny22 Sep 2010, 23:16683728g13996
Re: Benefits of StigmatizingGreg Rudzinski22 Sep 2010, 22:395844g13995
Re: A fluke of 0.0 intercept with Altair.Gary LaPook22 Sep 2010, 22:245526g13994
Re: A fluke of 0.0 intercept with Altair.Greg Rudzinski22 Sep 2010, 22:225666g13993
Re: A fluke of 0.0 intercept with Altair.Alan S22 Sep 2010, 21:586193g13992
Re: Degree symbol inputGeorge Huxtable22 Sep 2010, 19:525936g13991
Re: Degree symbol inputStan K22 Sep 2010, 19:429783g13990
Re: Benefits of StigmatizingJeremy C22 Sep 2010, 19:326368g13989
Re: Benefits of StigmatizingByron Franklin22 Sep 2010, 19:1511275g13988
Re: Benefits of StigmatizingGary LaPook22 Sep 2010, 19:025587g13987
Re: Degree symbol inputGary LaPook22 Sep 2010, 18:595734g13986
Re: Degree symbol inputGary LaPook22 Sep 2010, 18:526507g13985
Re: Degree symbol inputGary LaPook22 Sep 2010, 18:41201355g13984
Re: Benefits of StigmatizingJeremy C22 Sep 2010, 18:067277g13983
Re: Benefits of StigmatizingGary LaPook22 Sep 2010, 18:0816074g13982
Re: Degree symbol inputGary LaPook22 Sep 2010, 18:148525g13981
Re: A fluke of 0.0 intercept with Altair.Gary LaPook22 Sep 2010, 18:047659g13980
Re: Lewis and Clark.Peter Hakel22 Sep 2010, 17:5310456g13979
Re: Lewis and Clark.Ken Muldrew22 Sep 2010, 16:426071g13978
Re: Lewis and Clark.Alan S22 Sep 2010, 16:306085g13977
Benefits of AstigmatizingGreg Rudzinski22 Sep 2010, 15:297834g13976
Re: Degree symbol inputJames N Wilson22 Sep 2010, 14:297246g13975
Re: Degree symbol inputAntoine Couëtte22 Sep 2010, 13:278543g13974
Re: Degree symbol inputStan K22 Sep 2010, 13:1410499g13973
Re: A fluke of 0.0 intercept with Altair.Paul Jackson22 Sep 2010, 13:1217431g13972
Degree symbol inputGary LaPook22 Sep 2010, 11:067594g13971
Re: Benefits of StigmatizingGary LaPook22 Sep 2010, 10:231089775g13970
Re: Stellar Positioning SystemAntoine Couëtte22 Sep 2010, 09:495777g13969
Re: Stellar Positioning SystemAndrés Ruiz22 Sep 2010, 09:2113833g13968
Re: Stellar Positioning SystemAntoine Couëtte22 Sep 2010, 09:165907g13967
Angle symbols. was: A fluke of 0.0 intercept with Altair.George Huxtable22 Sep 2010, 08:556070g13966
Stellar Positioning SystemAndrés Ruiz22 Sep 2010, 08:2510564g13965
Re: A fluke of 0.0 intercept with Altair.Antoine Couëtte22 Sep 2010, 07:577469g13964
Re: A fluke of 0.0 intercept with Altair.George Huxtable22 Sep 2010, 07:427188g13963
Re: Benefits of StigmatizingGeorge Huxtable22 Sep 2010, 07:197286g13962
Re: A fluke of 0.0 intercept with Altair.Antoine Couëtte22 Sep 2010, 07:0714175g13961
Re: Lewis and Clark.Antoine Couëtte22 Sep 2010, 06:228146g13960
Re: Did the Titanic helmsman turn the wrong way?Gary LaPook22 Sep 2010, 06:1922346g13959
Re: sextant practice and time keepersGary LaPook22 Sep 2010, 05:547322g13958
Re: A fluke of 0.0 intercept with Altair.Gary LaPook22 Sep 2010, 05:437159g13957
Re: A fluke of 0.0 intercept with Altair.Alan S22 Sep 2010, 04:046165g13956
Did the Titanic helmsman turn the wrong way?Peter Fogg22 Sep 2010, 03:5922373g13955
Re: sextant practice and time keepersAlan S22 Sep 2010, 03:476203g13954
Re: A real close approachAlan S22 Sep 2010, 03:396048g13953
Re: A fluke of 0.0 intercept with Altair.Jeremy C21 Sep 2010, 23:5116583g13952
Re: Benefits of StigmatizingJeremy C21 Sep 2010, 23:4414392g13951
Re: A fluke of 0.0 intercept with Altair.Paul Jackson21 Sep 2010, 21:5314169g13950
Re: Benefits of StigmatizingIrv Haworth21 Sep 2010, 21:418069g13949
Re: Benefits of StigmatizingGreg Rudzinski21 Sep 2010, 19:426515g13948
Re: A fluke of 0.0 intercept with Altair.Mike Burkes21 Sep 2010, 19:2911196g13947
Re: Lewis and Clark.George Huxtable21 Sep 2010, 19:076062g13946
Re: Benefits of StigmatizingJeremy C21 Sep 2010, 18:479811g13945
Benefits of StigmatizingGreg Rudzinski21 Sep 2010, 18:376015g13944
Re: A fluke of 0.0 intercept with Altair.Peter Hakel21 Sep 2010, 18:06300700g13943
Re: Lewis and Clark. was: sextant practice and time keepersGeorge Huxtable21 Sep 2010, 17:057655g13942
Re: Lewis and Clark. was: sextant practice and time keepersKen Muldrew21 Sep 2010, 16:556470g13941
Re: Lewis and Clark. was: sextant practice and time keepersAntoine Couëtte21 Sep 2010, 16:306987g13940
Re: A fluke of 0.0 intercept with Altair.Jeremy C21 Sep 2010, 16:117880g13939
Re: Lewis and Clark. was: sextant practice and time keepersGeorge Huxtable21 Sep 2010, 13:489753g13938
Re: A fluke of 0.0 intercept with Altair.Antoine Couëtte21 Sep 2010, 12:138462g13937
A fluke of 0.0 intercept with Altair.Paul Jackson21 Sep 2010, 11:026182g13936
Re: sextant practice and time keepersGary LaPook21 Sep 2010, 07:4212349g13935
Re: A real close approachAlan S21 Sep 2010, 04:095946g13934
A real close approachJohn H21 Sep 2010, 00:276032g13933
Re: sextant practice and time keepersAlan S20 Sep 2010, 23:546552g13932
Re: webpages upset by skype. was: skype was: Lewis and ClarkGary LaPook20 Sep 2010, 22:286276g13931
Re: sextant practice and time keepersAntoine Couëtte20 Sep 2010, 21:515952g13930
Re: sextant practice and time keepersAntoine Couëtte20 Sep 2010, 21:505839g13929
Re: sextant practice and time keepersAlan S20 Sep 2010, 21:365641g13928
Re: sextant practice and time keepersAlan S20 Sep 2010, 21:026487g13927
Re: webpages upset by skype. was: skype was: Lewis and ClarkAntoine Couëtte20 Sep 2010, 20:385731g13926
Re: webpages upset by skype. was: skype was: Lewis and ClarkAntoine Couëtte20 Sep 2010, 20:375731g13925
Re: sextant practice and time keepersAntoine Couëtte20 Sep 2010, 20:3229733g13924
Re: sextant practice and time keepersAntoine Couëtte20 Sep 2010, 20:105882g13923
Re: sextant practice and time keepersAlan S20 Sep 2010, 20:086763g13922
Webpages upset by skype. was: skype was: Lewis and ClarkGeorge Huxtable20 Sep 2010, 19:479791g13921
Re: sextant practice and time keepersIrv Haworth20 Sep 2010, 18:267054g13920
Re: sextant practice and time keepersAntoine Couëtte20 Sep 2010, 18:017380g13919
Re: sextant practice and time keepersAlan S20 Sep 2010, 17:078875g13918
Re: Lewis and Clark.Peter Hollings20 Sep 2010, 16:1411527g13917
SkypeMichael Dorl20 Sep 2010, 13:076034g13916
Re: sextant practice and time keepersPaul Jackson20 Sep 2010, 03:368520g13915
Re: last USAF T-43 nav trainer retiresAlan S20 Sep 2010, 03:305910g13914
Re: sextant practice and time keepersAlan S20 Sep 2010, 03:235738g13913
Re: Lewis and Clark.Ken Muldrew19 Sep 2010, 16:285928g13912
Re: Lewis and Clark.Michael Dorl19 Sep 2010, 16:246673g13911
Re: sextant practice and time keepersIrv Haworth19 Sep 2010, 16:177597g13910
Re: Lewis and Clark.Michael Dorl19 Sep 2010, 15:136365g13909
Re: Lewis and Clark.George Huxtable19 Sep 2010, 08:528133g13908
Re: Lewis and Clark. was: sextant practice and time keepersGary LaPook19 Sep 2010, 04:166385g13907
Re: sextant practice and time keepersJeremy C19 Sep 2010, 03:029774g13906
Last USAF T-43 nav trainer retiresPaul Hirose18 Sep 2010, 23:475490g13905
Re: Lewis and Clark. was: sextant practice and time keepersHewitt Schlereth18 Sep 2010, 22:4119623g13904
Re: Lewis and Clark. was: sextant practice and time keepersJohn H18 Sep 2010, 21:2617702g13903
Lewis and Clark. was: sextant practice and time keepersGeorge Huxtable18 Sep 2010, 20:559503g13902
Re: sextant practice and time keepersHewitt Schlereth18 Sep 2010, 17:0410910g13901
Sextant practice and time keepersAlan S18 Sep 2010, 16:468210g13900
JupiterPhilip Lange18 Sep 2010, 16:034580g13899
Re: DSLR Venus LunarAntoine Couëtte18 Sep 2010, 13:058543g13898
Re: The 'Galileo Was Wrong: The Church Was Right' ConferencePeter Fogg18 Sep 2010, 10:3912707g13897
Re: DSLR Venus LunarGeorge Huxtable18 Sep 2010, 08:0316814g13896
Re: DSLR Venus LunarAntoine Couëtte17 Sep 2010, 15:2820992g13895
Re: Radium illuminationGary LaPook17 Sep 2010, 05:53956135g13894
Re: Geocentrism lives on!Greg Rudzinski17 Sep 2010, 03:245610g13893
Re: Geocentrism lives on!John Karl17 Sep 2010, 01:447177g13892
Re: Geocentrism lives on!Paul Jackson17 Sep 2010, 01:078437g13891
Re: Geocentrism lives on!Greg Rudzinski16 Sep 2010, 23:435757g13890
Geocentrism lives on!George Huxtable16 Sep 2010, 22:545206g13889
Re: DSLR Venus LunarGeorge Huxtable16 Sep 2010, 22:417970g13888
Re: Did a precessing gyro lead to the loss of Earhart?Jackie Ferrari16 Sep 2010, 19:139125g13887
Re: Did a precessing gyro lead to the loss of Earhart?Gary LaPook16 Sep 2010, 18:4010460g13886
Re: DSLR Venus LunarPeter Hakel16 Sep 2010, 18:3910189g13885
Re: DSLR Venus LunarGeorge Huxtable16 Sep 2010, 17:2911539g13884
Re: DSLR Venus LunarAntoine Couëtte16 Sep 2010, 14:408645g13883
Re: DSLR Venus LunarAntoine Couëtte16 Sep 2010, 11:2715365g13882
Re: DSLR Venus LunarGeorge Huxtable16 Sep 2010, 09:2814734g13881
Re: lurker from TynemouthAntoine Couëtte15 Sep 2010, 13:225670g13880
Lurker from TynemouthGeorge Huxtable15 Sep 2010, 12:285555g13879
Re: DSLR Venus LunarAntoine Couëtte15 Sep 2010, 11:2919151g13878
Re: Aviation Bubble SextantGary LaPook15 Sep 2010, 07:5721750g13877
Re: Digital watches for use as a chronometerGary LaPook15 Sep 2010, 00:35175440g13876
Re: Digital watches for use as a chronometerGary LaPook15 Sep 2010, 00:275701g13875
Re: Digital watches for use as a chronometerDouglas Denny15 Sep 2010, 00:177066g13874
Re: Digital watches for use as a chronometerGreg Rudzinski14 Sep 2010, 22:505983g13873
Digital watches for use as a chronometerGary LaPook14 Sep 2010, 22:069725g13872
Re: DSLR Venus LunarGreg Rudzinski14 Sep 2010, 15:396500g13871
Re: Atherton's HeliostatW F Jones14 Sep 2010, 12:157817g13870
Re: DSLR Venus LunarMarcel Tschudin14 Sep 2010, 09:205734g13869
Re: Digital camera: stars in daylightMarcel Tschudin14 Sep 2010, 09:149369g13868
Re: Venus in daytime with a true horizon.Paul Jackson14 Sep 2010, 09:0213881g13867
Re: Venus in daytime with a true horizon.Antoine Couëtte14 Sep 2010, 08:1210112g13866
Re: Digital camera: stars in daylightGeorge Huxtable14 Sep 2010, 07:087996g13865
Re: Atherton's HeliostatGary LaPook14 Sep 2010, 05:268254g13864
Re: Egregious navigation exampleGary LaPook14 Sep 2010, 04:3118198g13863
Re: Egregious navigation exampleJames N Wilson14 Sep 2010, 03:0880041g13862
Re: Did a precessing gyro lead to the loss of Earhart?Gary LaPook14 Sep 2010, 01:58685843g13861
Re: DSLR Venus LunarGreg Rudzinski14 Sep 2010, 00:396736g13860
Re: Did a precessing gyro lead to the loss of Earhart?Gary LaPook13 Sep 2010, 21:20128735g13859
Re: Celesticomp instruction manualKen Gebhart13 Sep 2010, 18:109773g13858
Re: Digital camera: stars in daylightPeter Hakel13 Sep 2010, 17:449375g13857
Flight navigation manualsGary LaPook13 Sep 2010, 17:456129g13856
Re: DSLR Venus LunarGreg Rudzinski13 Sep 2010, 15:1415581g13855
Re: Digital camera: stars in daylightMarcel Tschudin13 Sep 2010, 13:3711836g13854
Atherton's HeliostatW F Jones13 Sep 2010, 12:565487g13853
Re: Digital camera: stars in daylightGeorge Huxtable13 Sep 2010, 11:3410474g13852
DSLR Venus LunarGreg Rudzinski13 Sep 2010, 05:346091g13851
Re: Venus in daytime with a true horizon.Paul Jackson13 Sep 2010, 04:502298150g13850
Re: Day Venus DSLR TrialGreg Rudzinski13 Sep 2010, 04:196073g13849
Day Venus DSLR TrialGreg Rudzinski13 Sep 2010, 03:477845g13848
Day Venus DSLR TrialGreg Rudzinski13 Sep 2010, 03:467845g13847
Re: Did a precessing gyro lead to the loss of Earhart?Gary LaPook13 Sep 2010, 02:3221767g13846
Re: Venus During the day.Jeremy C13 Sep 2010, 00:596074g13845
Re: Aviation Bubble SextantRonald P Barrett13 Sep 2010, 00:1114078g13844
Venus in daytime with a true horizon.Paul Jackson13 Sep 2010, 00:026760g13843
Re: Venus During the day.Greg Rudzinski12 Sep 2010, 22:395870g13842
Re: Venus During the day.Paul Jackson12 Sep 2010, 22:178746g13841
Re: Venus During the day.Paul Jackson12 Sep 2010, 22:079720g13840
Save USS OlympiaFrank Reed12 Sep 2010, 21:557071g13839
Re: Celesticomp instruction manualPaul Jackson12 Sep 2010, 21:549770g13838
Re: Venus During the day.Frank Reed12 Sep 2010, 21:466805g13837
Re: Digital camera: stars in daylightFrank Reed12 Sep 2010, 21:2716321g13836
Re: Venus During the day.Paul Jackson12 Sep 2010, 21:117416g13835
Re: Digital camera: stars in daylightFrank Reed12 Sep 2010, 20:488655g13834
Re: Digital camera: stars in daylightFrank Reed12 Sep 2010, 20:3628211g13833
Re: slide rule tubes now availableWolfgang Hasper12 Sep 2010, 19:398897g13832
Re: Digital camera: stars in daylightGeorge Huxtable12 Sep 2010, 19:286408g13831
YouTube video: Flying a 4-course radio rangeGreg R_12 Sep 2010, 19:228299g13830
Re: Did a precessing gyro lead to the loss of Earhart?Jackie Ferrari12 Sep 2010, 19:0517481g13829
Re: Digital camera: stars in daylightMarcel Tschudin12 Sep 2010, 18:506193g13828
Re: Venus During the day.Peter Hakel12 Sep 2010, 18:099423g13827
Re: Did a precessing gyro lead to the loss of Earhart?Peter Hakel12 Sep 2010, 18:036203g13826
Re: Digital camera: stars in daylightFrank Reed12 Sep 2010, 17:4111682g13825
Lunars: altitude accuracyJohn Karl12 Sep 2010, 17:0010084g13824
Re: Did a precessing gyro lead to the loss of Earhart?Gary LaPook12 Sep 2010, 16:287965g13823
Re: Celesticomp instruction manualSuzann12 Sep 2010, 15:586406g13822
Re: Venus During the day.Antoine Couëtte12 Sep 2010, 15:425915g13821
Re: Venus During the day.Greg Rudzinski12 Sep 2010, 15:305876g13820
Re: Venus During the day.Paul Jackson12 Sep 2010, 15:2110695g13819
Re: Digital camera: stars in daylightDave Walden12 Sep 2010, 13:217605g13818
Re: Venus During the day.Antoine Couëtte12 Sep 2010, 13:0512750g13817
Re: Venus During the day.Marcel Tschudin12 Sep 2010, 10:266392g13816
Re: Venus During the day.Paul Jackson12 Sep 2010, 09:389100g13815
Re: Venus During the day.Paul Jackson12 Sep 2010, 08:479853g13814
Re: Egregious navigation exampleGary LaPook12 Sep 2010, 05:1411721g13813
Re: Venus During the day.Jeremy C12 Sep 2010, 04:147734g13812
Did a precessing gyro lead to the loss of Earhart?Gary LaPook12 Sep 2010, 03:0815992g13811
Re: Looking for references on "aiming off"Gary LaPook11 Sep 2010, 19:2619579g13810
Re: Venus During the day.Greg Rudzinski11 Sep 2010, 18:286048g13809
Re: Venus During the day.Antoine Couëtte11 Sep 2010, 17:226765g13808
Re: Venus During the day.Frank Reed11 Sep 2010, 16:599923g13807
Re: Digital camera: stars in daylightGeorge Huxtable11 Sep 2010, 16:2011210g13806
Re: Looking for references on "aiming off"John H11 Sep 2010, 16:209831g13805
Re: Looking for references on "aiming off"Hewitt Schlereth11 Sep 2010, 16:138479g13804
Re: Digital camera: stars in daylightHewitt Schlereth11 Sep 2010, 16:0613927g13803
Re: Venus During the day.Marcel Tschudin11 Sep 2010, 15:567075g13802
Re: Venus During the day.Greg Rudzinski11 Sep 2010, 15:296576g13801
Re: Aviation Bubble SextantDave Harwood11 Sep 2010, 14:5716820g13800
Digital camera: stars in daylightFrank Reed11 Sep 2010, 11:1211642g13799
Re: Venus During the day.Marcel Tschudin11 Sep 2010, 09:097316g13798
Digital photo of Venus during the day.Paul Jackson11 Sep 2010, 08:455902g13797
Re: Looking for references on "aiming off"George Huxtable11 Sep 2010, 08:365553g13796
Re: Venus During the day.Paul Jackson11 Sep 2010, 08:311752928g13795
Re: Venus During the day.Paul Jackson11 Sep 2010, 07:517617g13794
Re: Venus During the day.Marcel Tschudin11 Sep 2010, 06:515946g13793
Re: Looking for references on "aiming off"Gary LaPook11 Sep 2010, 06:30825925g13792
Re: Venus During the day.Antoine Couëtte11 Sep 2010, 06:176353g13791
Re: Venus During the day.Paul Jackson11 Sep 2010, 05:059309g13790
Re: Looking for references on "aiming off"Bill Morris11 Sep 2010, 04:356169g13789
Re: Venus During the day.Greg Rudzinski11 Sep 2010, 02:396388g13788
Re: Looking for references on "aiming off"Hewitt Schlereth11 Sep 2010, 00:3523480g13787
Re: Looking for references on "aiming off"George Huxtable10 Sep 2010, 23:5311441g13786
Venus During the day.Paul Jackson10 Sep 2010, 22:586443g13785
Re: Looking for references on "aiming off"Gary LaPook10 Sep 2010, 20:4213125g13784
Re: Looking for references on "aiming off"Jackie Ferrari10 Sep 2010, 20:1310475g13783
Re: Looking for references on "aiming off"Irv Haworth10 Sep 2010, 18:467708g13782
Re: Egregious navigation exampleByron Franklin10 Sep 2010, 18:366073g13781
Re: Looking for references on "aiming off"George Huxtable10 Sep 2010, 17:156495g13780
Re: Looking for references on "aiming off"Gary LaPook10 Sep 2010, 17:077392g13779
Re: Looking for references on "aiming off"Gary LaPook10 Sep 2010, 17:057710g13778
Re: Looking for references on "aiming off"John Karl10 Sep 2010, 17:026033g13777
Re: Aviation Bubble SextantGary LaPook10 Sep 2010, 16:598943g13776
Re: Aviation Bubble SextantGary LaPook10 Sep 2010, 16:3510530g13775
Re: Aviation Bubble SextantDave Harwood10 Sep 2010, 13:418852g13774
Re: Looking for references on "aiming off"Frank Reed10 Sep 2010, 13:256395g13773
Looking for references on "aiming off"Tom Temple10 Sep 2010, 13:206886g13772
Re: Egregious navigation exampleAntoine Couëtte10 Sep 2010, 09:448285g13771
Egregious navigation exampleGary LaPook9 Sep 2010, 20:2912848g13770
Re: "Impossible" Lunars: Nauticus v. Maskelyne, 1786George Huxtable9 Sep 2010, 15:2743645g13769
Re: Radium illuminationGary LaPook9 Sep 2010, 05:1811403g13768
Re: Lunars: altitude accuracyDouglas Denny8 Sep 2010, 21:017288g13767
Re: Lunars: altitude accuracyGeorge Brandenburg8 Sep 2010, 20:238237g13766
Re: Impossible lunar exampleDouglas Denny8 Sep 2010, 19:2410953g13765
Re: Radium illuminationMarcel Tschudin8 Sep 2010, 11:536869g13764
Re: Radium illuminationDouglas Denny8 Sep 2010, 10:1611037g13763
Re: Radium illuminationGary LaPook8 Sep 2010, 02:35303222g13762
Re: slide rule tubes now availableTom Sult7 Sep 2010, 19:2113754g13761
Scary RadiumMike Bowman7 Sep 2010, 12:405942g13760
Re: Radium illuminationDouglas Denny7 Sep 2010, 10:3217376g13759
"Impossible" Lunars: Nauticus v. Maskelyne, 1786Frank Reed7 Sep 2010, 08:1584432g13758
Re: Lunars: altitude accuracyFrank Reed7 Sep 2010, 08:008709g13757
Re: Radium illuminationFrank Reed7 Sep 2010, 07:4911236g13756
Re: slide rule tubes now availableAry Bovenkerk6 Sep 2010, 22:1313090g13755
Re: Radium illuminationGeorge Huxtable6 Sep 2010, 18:387477g13754
Re: Radium illuminationGary LaPook6 Sep 2010, 18:048841g13753
Re: Radium illuminationGreg Rudzinski6 Sep 2010, 17:396186g13752
Re: Radium illuminationGeorge Huxtable6 Sep 2010, 17:137798g13751
Re: Radium illuminationGiuseppe Menga6 Sep 2010, 15:309611g13750
Re: Radium illuminationGreg Rudzinski6 Sep 2010, 15:047488g13749
Re: radium and the perilsPhilip Lange6 Sep 2010, 14:295382g13748
Re: Radium illuminationDouglas Denny6 Sep 2010, 11:339700g13747
Radium and the perilsMike Bowman6 Sep 2010, 10:245808g13746
Re: Radium illuminationGeorge Huxtable6 Sep 2010, 07:456975g13745
Re: Radium illuminationBill Morris6 Sep 2010, 02:589450g13744
Re: Radium illuminationJohn H6 Sep 2010, 01:219297g13743
Re: Radium illuminationGary LaPook6 Sep 2010, 00:207185g13742
Re: Radium illuminationGary LaPook6 Sep 2010, 00:137117g13741
Re: Radium illuminationGary LaPook6 Sep 2010, 00:1110128g13740
Re: Radium illuminationJohn H5 Sep 2010, 23:427041g13739
Re: Radium illuminationGeorge Huxtable5 Sep 2010, 23:097809g13738
Re: Radium illuminationJohn H5 Sep 2010, 22:5711015g13737
Radium illuminationGary LaPook5 Sep 2010, 22:458090g13736
Re: Lunars: altitude accuracyGeorge Brandenburg5 Sep 2010, 15:286276g13735
Lunars: altitude accuracyFrank Reed5 Sep 2010, 09:1031099g13734
Re: Using an artificial horizonGary LaPook4 Sep 2010, 06:119317g13733
Re: Using an artificial horizonGary LaPook3 Sep 2010, 00:4916037g13732
Re: Using an artificial horizonGreg Rudzinski3 Sep 2010, 00:046672g13731
Re: Using an artificial horizonMike Burkes2 Sep 2010, 23:5811288g13730
Re: Using an artificial horizonAndrew Corl2 Sep 2010, 23:0911023g13729
Re: Using an artificial horizonBill Morris2 Sep 2010, 20:247011g13728
Re: Using an artificial horizonGary LaPook2 Sep 2010, 16:199803g13727
Re: Using an artificial horizonPeter Hakel2 Sep 2010, 15:558522g13726
Re: Using an artificial horizonKen Muldrew2 Sep 2010, 15:095824g13725
Re: Using an artificial horizonG Becker2 Sep 2010, 13:225787g13724
Re: Using an artificial horizonAndrew Corl2 Sep 2010, 13:1611031g13723
Re: Impossible lunar exampleDouglas Denny2 Sep 2010, 12:556162g13722
Re: Impossible lunar exampleDouglas Denny2 Sep 2010, 12:516151g13721
Re: Using an artificial horizonDouglas Denny2 Sep 2010, 12:477040g13720
Re: Impossible lunar exampleDouglas Denny2 Sep 2010, 12:447269g13719
Re: Using an artificial horizonG Becker2 Sep 2010, 12:405967g13718
Re: Using an artificial horizonDouglas Denny2 Sep 2010, 12:266503g13717
Re: Impossible lunar exampleDouglas Denny2 Sep 2010, 12:227328g13716
Using an artificial horizonAndrew Corl2 Sep 2010, 12:157475g13715
Re: Impossible lunar exampleGeorge Huxtable2 Sep 2010, 08:197132g13714
Re: Impossible lunar exampleGeorge Huxtable2 Sep 2010, 08:118665g13713
Re: Impossible lunar exampleDouglas Denny2 Sep 2010, 08:108295g13712
Re: Impossible lunar exampleDouglas Denny2 Sep 2010, 07:356333g13711
Re: Impossible lunar exampleRobin Stuart1 Sep 2010, 23:268174g13710
Re: Impossible lunar exampleDouglas Denny1 Sep 2010, 21:248015g13709
Re: Impossible lunar exampleGeorge Huxtable1 Sep 2010, 21:229152g13708
Re: Impossible lunar exampleRobin Stuart1 Sep 2010, 21:205961g13707
Re: Impossible lunar exampleGeorge Huxtable1 Sep 2010, 21:057674g13706
Re: Impossible lunar exampleDouglas Denny1 Sep 2010, 20:5611940g13705
Re: Impossible lunar exampleRobin Stuart1 Sep 2010, 18:178785g13704
Re: Jesse Ramsden's Circular Dividing Engine: A commentaryJürgen Hoefeld1 Sep 2010, 07:3013560g13703
Re: Jesse Ramsden's Circular Dividing Engine: A commentaryGary LaPook1 Sep 2010, 06:4013997g13702
Jesse Ramsden's Circular Dividing Engine: A commentaryBill Morris1 Sep 2010, 01:5911162g13701

Index includes 370 messages.

NavList

What is NavList?

Join NavList

Name:
(please, no nicknames or handles)
Email:
Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
Yes No

You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

Posting Code

Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
Email:

Email Settings

Posting Code:

Custom Index

Subject:
Author:
Start date: (yyyymm dd)
End date: (yyyymm dd)

Visit this site
Visit this site
Visit this site
Visit this site
Visit this site
Visit this site