Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Position-Finding

August, 2009

Index includes 381 messages. Sorted by message ID, in descending order.
SubjectAuthorDate (UT)SizeID
Hagner newsreelDave Walden31 Aug 2009, 16:456619g9657
Re: Searching the archive.Gary LaPook31 Aug 2009, 08:274517g9656
Re: Hughes Bubble sextant Mk IXABill Morris30 Aug 2009, 10:506842g9655
Modification to 2102-DByron Franklin29 Aug 2009, 22:13337241g9654
Re: "dead reckoning" in GermanRonald van Riet29 Aug 2009, 12:164409g9653
Re: Nevil Maskelyne's SignatureBrad Morris29 Aug 2009, 01:415305g9652
Re: "dead reckoning" in GermanThomas Kleemann28 Aug 2009, 22:075227g9651
Nevil Maskelyne's SignatureBrad Morris28 Aug 2009, 17:247235g9650
Re: Hughes Bubble sextant Mk IXABill Morris28 Aug 2009, 02:285573g9649
Re: Hughes Bubble sextant Mk IXAGary LaPook28 Aug 2009, 00:185934g9648
Re: Hughes Bubble sextant Mk IXAGary LaPook28 Aug 2009, 00:108119g9647
I'm the newest memberBill Cope26 Aug 2009, 15:198183g9646
Re: Hughes Bubble sextant Mk IXANavList Messages27 Aug 2009, 15:347293g9645
Re: "dead reckoning" in GermanMarcel Tschudin27 Aug 2009, 08:317048g9644
Re: "dead reckoning" in GermanMarcel Tschudin27 Aug 2009, 08:267093g9643
Re: "dead reckoning" in GermanPeter Fogg27 Aug 2009, 08:237836g9642
"dead reckoning" in GermanRonald van Riet27 Aug 2009, 08:204274g9641
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix26 Aug 2009, 23:5016089g9640
Re: Tracking down a referenceGary LaPook26 Aug 2009, 21:544914g9639
Re: Tracking down a referenceWolfgang Köberer26 Aug 2009, 19:079424g9638
Re: sextant for use on landGeoffrey Kolbe26 Aug 2009, 18:4411407g9637
Re: Tracking down a referenceJohn H26 Aug 2009, 15:1611291g9636
Re: sextant for use on landRonald P Barrett26 Aug 2009, 15:009527g9635
Re: sextant for use on landNavList Messages26 Aug 2009, 07:296833g9634
Re: Coriolis and gyros (second attempt)(typoscorrected)Gary LaPook25 Aug 2009, 23:4213211g9633
Re: PIM: Precision Indication of the MeridianPeter Hakel25 Aug 2009, 22:5910168g9632
Re: Coriolis and gyros (second attempt)(typoscorrected)Peter Hakel25 Aug 2009, 22:5826739g9631
PIM: Precision Indication of the MeridianDouglas Denny25 Aug 2009, 19:346892g9630
Daytime VenusGreg Rudzinski25 Aug 2009, 18:444676g9629
Re: Tracking down a referenceGeorge Huxtable25 Aug 2009, 18:37684652g9628
Re: Sextant RepairsDouglas Denny25 Aug 2009, 18:06127554g9627
Re: Sextant RepairsDouglas Denny25 Aug 2009, 17:47252230g9626
Tracking down a referenceJohn H25 Aug 2009, 17:448017g9625
Re: Sextant RepairsBrad Morris25 Aug 2009, 12:365567g9624
Re: The development of bubble sextantsJean-Philippe Planas25 Aug 2009, 12:1723941g9623
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGeorge Huxtable25 Aug 2009, 09:107303g9622
Re: Coriolis and gyros (second attempt)(typoscorrected)Gary LaPook25 Aug 2009, 08:5912679g9621
Re: Coriolis and gyros (second attempt)(typoscorrected)Gary LaPook25 Aug 2009, 08:5120576g9620
Re: The development of bubble sextantsBill Morris25 Aug 2009, 05:347826g9619
Re: Coriolis and gyros (second attempt)(typoscorrected)Peter Hakel25 Aug 2009, 03:2918126g9618
Re: Sextant RepairsNavList Messages19 Aug 2009, 23:136803g9617
The development of bubble sextantsPeter Hollings24 Aug 2009, 18:2715529g9616
Re: Uh oh, time to redo the Nautical AlmanacBrad Morris24 Aug 2009, 21:466616g9615
Re: Coriolis and gyros (second attempt)(typoscorrected)Gary LaPook24 Aug 2009, 17:2910108g9614
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DByron Franklin24 Aug 2009, 16:33240056g9613
Uh oh, time to redo the Nautical AlmanacLu Abel24 Aug 2009, 16:135738g9612
Re: Coriolis and gyros (second attempt)(typoscorrected)Frank Reed24 Aug 2009, 13:387142g9611
Re: Lost people DO follow circles, says researchBill B24 Aug 2009, 04:036413g9610
Re: Lost people DO follow circles, says researchGeorge Huxtable23 Aug 2009, 15:1412330g9609
Searching the archive.Gary LaPook23 Aug 2009, 14:216958g9608
Re: Coriolis and gyros (second attempt)(typoscorrected)Gary LaPook23 Aug 2009, 14:1610279g9607
Re: Coriolis and gyros (second attempt)(typoscorrected)Gary LaPook23 Aug 2009, 14:10906083g9606
Re: Coriolis and gyrosGary LaPook23 Aug 2009, 13:39906134g9605
Re: Lost people DO follow circles, says researchDouglas Denny23 Aug 2009, 00:4510012g9604
Re: Lost people DO follow circles, says researchGeorge Huxtable22 Aug 2009, 20:127572g9603
Walking straightDoug22 Aug 2009, 17:306454g9602
Re: Which diameter of the sun in digital photos ?Marcel Tschudin22 Aug 2009, 14:1210864g9601
Re: Lost people DO follow circles, says researchJohn H22 Aug 2009, 13:479080g9600
Re: Lost people DO follow circles, says researchGeorge Huxtable22 Aug 2009, 13:209220g9599
Re: Lost people DO follow circles, says researchPhilip Lange22 Aug 2009, 10:569962g9598
Re: Lost people DO follow circles, says researchJames N Wilson22 Aug 2009, 03:177713g9597
Re: Lost people DO follow circles, says researchMichael Dorl22 Aug 2009, 01:388593g9596
Re: Lost people DO follow circles, says researchPeter Fogg22 Aug 2009, 00:068846g9595
Re: Which diameter of the sun in digital photos ?George Huxtable21 Aug 2009, 23:199677g9594
Re: Which diameter of the sun in digital photos ?Bill B21 Aug 2009, 22:337099g9593
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix21 Aug 2009, 21:5517108g9592
Re: Lost people DO follow circles, says researchJohn H21 Aug 2009, 21:387776g9591
Re: Which diameter of the sun in digital photos ?Greg Rudzinski21 Aug 2009, 20:256413g9590
Re: Which diameter of the sun in digital photos ?Marcel Tschudin21 Aug 2009, 19:387580g9589
Re: Which diameter of the sun in digital photos ?Greg Rudzinski21 Aug 2009, 18:496513g9588
Re: Which diameter of the sun in digital photos ?Greg Rudzinski21 Aug 2009, 18:265911g9587
Re: Which diameter of the sun in digital photos ?Marcel Tschudin21 Aug 2009, 18:198112g9586
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGeorge Huxtable21 Aug 2009, 15:398994g9585
Re: Which diameter of the sun in digital photos ?George Huxtable21 Aug 2009, 14:558293g9584
Which diameter of the sun in digital photos ?Marcel Tschudin21 Aug 2009, 11:497454g9583
Re: Lost people DO follow circles, says researchDouglas Denny21 Aug 2009, 11:499555g9582
Re: missing messageGary LaPook21 Aug 2009, 07:236047g9581
Re: missing messageFrank Reed21 Aug 2009, 01:477570g9580
Lost people DO follow circles, says researchPeter Fogg21 Aug 2009, 00:4714590g9579
Missing messageGary LaPook20 Aug 2009, 18:475093g9578
Missing messageGary LaPook20 Aug 2009, 18:436279g9577
[Fwd: Re: Coriolis and gyros]Gary LaPook20 Aug 2009, 18:33376527g9576
Re: Coriolis and gyrosGary LaPook20 Aug 2009, 17:40375699g9575
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix20 Aug 2009, 15:3422594g9574
Re: Coriolis and gyrosJohn H20 Aug 2009, 13:5412766g9573
Coriolis and gyrosFrank Reed20 Aug 2009, 13:028208g9572
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook20 Aug 2009, 09:3318467g9571
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix18 Aug 2009, 22:3037115g9570
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGeorge Huxtable18 Aug 2009, 20:1215735g9569
Re: welcome.Antoine Couëtte18 Aug 2009, 15:127064g9568
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix18 Aug 2009, 18:0318684g9567
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook18 Aug 2009, 18:0010494g9566
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix18 Aug 2009, 17:4219516g9565
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix18 Aug 2009, 17:0214887g9564
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook18 Aug 2009, 13:1211190g9563
Re: The development of bubble sextantsDouglas Denny18 Aug 2009, 11:567318g9562
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGeorge Huxtable18 Aug 2009, 10:4410095g9561
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook18 Aug 2009, 10:069512g9560
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix18 Aug 2009, 03:571854619g9559
Re: Manufacture of BygravesTom Sult18 Aug 2009, 02:3210304g9558
Re: The development of bubble sextantsPaul Hirose17 Aug 2009, 22:456394g9557
Re: Manufacture of BygravesGary LaPook17 Aug 2009, 21:4310086g9556
Celestial nav for BlackberryJim Hickey17 Aug 2009, 19:114476g9555
Re: The development of bubble sextantsLu Abel17 Aug 2009, 18:247331g9554
Re: Mark IX sextant manualPaul Brewer17 Aug 2009, 12:156833g9553
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook17 Aug 2009, 12:1423573g9552
Re: Mark IX sextant manualHein Bodahl17 Aug 2009, 10:297545g9551
Re: Navigation gathering: Mystic, Spring 2010Brad Morris17 Aug 2009, 00:526596g9550
Re: The development of bubble sextantsPeter Hakel16 Aug 2009, 23:4922224g9549
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook16 Aug 2009, 22:5911916g9548
Re: The development of bubble sextantsDouglas Denny16 Aug 2009, 21:225569g9547
Re: Navigation gathering: Mystic, Spring 2010Stan K16 Aug 2009, 16:2118303g9546
Re: ephemeris & positional astronomy Windows DLLFrank Reed16 Aug 2009, 15:396497g9545
Re: ephemeris & positional astronomy Windows DLLMichael Dorl16 Aug 2009, 13:575875g9544
Re: typical standard deviation?Jeremy C16 Aug 2009, 12:1713032g9543
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook16 Aug 2009, 01:1211779g9542
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook15 Aug 2009, 23:5112385g9541
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook15 Aug 2009, 23:479624g9540
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix15 Aug 2009, 20:2214606g9539
Re: typical standard deviation?Henry Halboth15 Aug 2009, 19:3034992g9538
Re: Navigation gathering: Mystic, Spring 2010Ronald P Barrett15 Aug 2009, 19:2616218g9537
Re: ephemeris & positional astronomy Windows DLLPaul Hirose15 Aug 2009, 19:008749g9536
Navigation gathering: Mystic, Spring 2010Frank Reed15 Aug 2009, 18:527886g9535
Re: typical standard deviation?Frank Reed15 Aug 2009, 17:219301g9534
First Artificial Horizon.Clive Sutherland15 Aug 2009, 16:40261011g9533
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsBrad Morris15 Aug 2009, 16:255360g9532
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix15 Aug 2009, 16:1913620g9531
Re: typical standard deviation?Jeremy C15 Aug 2009, 15:5513612g9530
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsJeremy C15 Aug 2009, 15:5510386g9529
Re: The development of bubble sextantsFrank Reed15 Aug 2009, 15:539324g9528
Re: The development of bubble sextantsFrank Reed15 Aug 2009, 15:268353g9527
Re: ephemeris & positional astronomy Windows DLLNavList Messages15 Aug 2009, 12:406829g9526
Re: The development of bubble sextantsDouglas Denny15 Aug 2009, 13:477646g9525
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook15 Aug 2009, 10:597997g9524
Re: The development of bubble sextantsDouglas Denny15 Aug 2009, 09:436412g9523
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DByron Franklin15 Aug 2009, 00:356421g9522
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook15 Aug 2009, 00:27837984g9521
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook15 Aug 2009, 00:0719632g9520
Re: The development of bubble sextantsDouglas Denny14 Aug 2009, 23:557316g9519
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix14 Aug 2009, 23:5132742g9518
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix14 Aug 2009, 23:5132783g9517
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix14 Aug 2009, 23:4019243g9516
Re: The development of bubble sextantsBrad Morris14 Aug 2009, 20:487602g9515
Re: Advice on SextantBill Morris14 Aug 2009, 20:165882g9514
Re: The development of bubble sextantsClive Sutherland14 Aug 2009, 20:06211807g9513
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGeorge Huxtable14 Aug 2009, 18:5515513g9512
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix14 Aug 2009, 17:0823846g9511
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGeorge Huxtable14 Aug 2009, 15:2110071g9510
Re: Advice on SextantNavList Messages14 Aug 2009, 13:445906g9509
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook14 Aug 2009, 09:2817105g9508
Re: The development of bubble sextantsBill Morris14 Aug 2009, 09:118170g9507
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix14 Aug 2009, 05:1614687g9506
Re: slide rule sight reduction accuracyGary LaPook14 Aug 2009, 00:478601g9505
Re: typical standard deviation?M v Noorden13 Aug 2009, 09:076502g9504
Re: Modifications to 2102-DGary LaPook13 Aug 2009, 21:241005771g9503
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsChristian Scheele13 Aug 2009, 20:468562g9502
CotterChristian Scheele13 Aug 2009, 20:378697g9501
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Christian Scheele13 Aug 2009, 19:466420g9500
Re: Modifications to 2102-DBrad Morris13 Aug 2009, 18:158133g9499
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DByron Franklin13 Aug 2009, 17:545177g9498
Re: Fw: Grounding of cruiser PORT ROYALGary LaPook13 Aug 2009, 17:407686g9497
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DByron Franklin13 Aug 2009, 17:365451g9496
Re: Modifications to 2102-DGary LaPook13 Aug 2009, 17:155270g9495
Re: Modifications to 2102-DGary LaPook13 Aug 2009, 17:126155g9494
Re: Modifications to 2102-DByron Franklin13 Aug 2009, 15:436844g9493
Re: slide rule sight reduction accuracyHein Bodahl13 Aug 2009, 10:40486143g9492
Re: The development of bubble sextantsBill Morris13 Aug 2009, 07:035257g9491
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DByron Franklin13 Aug 2009, 00:307219g9490
Re: The development of bubble sextantsDouglas Simpson13 Aug 2009, 00:157094g9489
The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook12 Aug 2009, 23:085135g9488
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DGary LaPook12 Aug 2009, 22:33235422g9487
Re: software to draw scalesHanno Ix12 Aug 2009, 20:1911632g9486
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DBrad Morris12 Aug 2009, 17:599296g9485
Re: software to draw scalesHanno Ix12 Aug 2009, 17:2610460g9484
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DByron Franklin12 Aug 2009, 17:16229879g9483
Re: typical standard deviation?Jeremy C12 Aug 2009, 14:5521443g9482
Re: typical standard deviation?Gary LaPook12 Aug 2009, 12:4017566g9481
Re: typical standard deviation?George Huxtable12 Aug 2009, 09:5611151g9480
Typical standard deviation?Jeremy C12 Aug 2009, 06:3511410g9479
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DByron Franklin12 Aug 2009, 01:346613g9478
Software to draw scalesAndrew Nikitin12 Aug 2009, 01:286798g9477
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsGeorge Huxtable11 Aug 2009, 23:5463587g9476
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsJames N Wilson11 Aug 2009, 19:108525g9475
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsChristian Scheele11 Aug 2009, 18:197708g9474
Re: Mark IX sextant manualPaul Brewer11 Aug 2009, 14:597104g9473
Re: Mark IX sextant manualHein Bodahl11 Aug 2009, 12:026991g9472
Modifacation to 2102-DByron Franklin11 Aug 2009, 11:534366g9471
Re: Mark IX sextant manualHein Bodahl11 Aug 2009, 11:456856g9470
Re: Mark IX sextant manualHein Bodahl11 Aug 2009, 11:396984g9469
Re: Mark IX sextant manualPaul Brewer11 Aug 2009, 11:396035g9468
Re: Mark IX sextant manualRichard Dunn11 Aug 2009, 09:556294g9467
Re: Mark IX sextant manualDouglas Simpson11 Aug 2009, 05:458302g9466
Byrd Sextant (or should it be "de Florez Sextant"Bill Morris11 Aug 2009, 05:416763g9465
Mark IX sextant manualBill Morris11 Aug 2009, 05:27220353g9464
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsGeorge Huxtable10 Aug 2009, 23:368458g9463
Re: Modification to 2102-DBrad Morris10 Aug 2009, 20:058852g9462
Re: NavList 9435] Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2partsBrad Morris10 Aug 2009, 17:0714099g9461
Re: NavList 9435] Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2partsPeter Hakel10 Aug 2009, 16:4410828g9460
NavList 9435] Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsGeorge Huxtable10 Aug 2009, 14:0094176g9459
Re: Usefulness of the slope techniquePeter Fogg10 Aug 2009, 11:5110528g9458
Re: kollsman periscopic sextantDouglas Simpson10 Aug 2009, 11:389107g9457
Re: Clarification offered and requested Re: Multi-Moonlin...Jeremy C10 Aug 2009, 09:5918930g9456
Re: kollsman periscopic sextantDouglas Simpson10 Aug 2009, 00:418110g9455
Re: kollsman periscopic sextantDouglas Simpson10 Aug 2009, 00:409673g9454
Re: Clarification offered and requested Re: Multi-Moonline exercise in 2 partsPeter Hakel9 Aug 2009, 23:3312264g9453
Re: Clarification offered and requested Re: Multi-Moonline exercise in 2 partsNavList Messages9 Aug 2009, 21:0713087g9452
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance.George Huxtable9 Aug 2009, 19:589610g9451
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance.George Huxtable9 Aug 2009, 19:307740g9450
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance.Hanno Ix9 Aug 2009, 18:4018300g9449
MARK 5 bubble sextant manualGary LaPook9 Aug 2009, 18:22460340g9448
MK IX bubble sextant manualGary LaPook9 Aug 2009, 18:205074g9447
Re: Manufacture of BygravesBrad Morris9 Aug 2009, 18:1918625g9446
CHO-T (SNO-T) sextant manualGary LaPook9 Aug 2009, 18:175107g9445
Balldrop sextant manualGary LaPook9 Aug 2009, 18:145160g9444
A-12 bubble sextant manualGary LaPook9 Aug 2009, 16:196200g9443
A-6 bubble sextant manualGary LaPook9 Aug 2009, 16:156137g9442
A-5 and A-7 bubble sextant manualGary LaPook9 Aug 2009, 16:136098g9441
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsPeter Hakel9 Aug 2009, 16:0923616g9440
Manuals for Kollsman MA-1 sextantGary LaPook9 Aug 2009, 15:57686042g9439
Re: kollsman periscopic sextantGary LaPook9 Aug 2009, 15:496431g9438
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance.Geoffrey Kolbe9 Aug 2009, 15:465902g9437
Re: kollsman periscopic sextantGary LaPook9 Aug 2009, 15:215022g9436
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsJeremy C9 Aug 2009, 15:167917g9435
Kollsman periscopic sextantDouglas Simpson9 Aug 2009, 14:336701g9434
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance.Nicolàs de Hilster9 Aug 2009, 14:178706g9433
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance.George Huxtable9 Aug 2009, 14:0310409g9432
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance.Geoffrey Kolbe9 Aug 2009, 10:089401g9431
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance.George Huxtable9 Aug 2009, 09:078527g9430
Re: Manufacture of BygravesGary LaPook9 Aug 2009, 07:50132371g9429
Re: Manufacture of BygravesGary LaPook9 Aug 2009, 07:3911187g9428
Re: Manufacture of BygravesWolfgang Köberer9 Aug 2009, 07:347999g9427
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsBill B9 Aug 2009, 07:316841g9426
Re: Manufacture of BygravesHanno Ix9 Aug 2009, 04:4117263g9425
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance.Hanno Ix9 Aug 2009, 04:3830039g9424
Re: Manufacture of BygravesBrad Morris9 Aug 2009, 03:199642g9423
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance.Brad Morris9 Aug 2009, 02:4427671g9422
Modification to 2102-DByron Franklin9 Aug 2009, 00:045781g9421
Usefulness of the slope techniquePeter Fogg9 Aug 2009, 00:5013048g9420
Welcome.George Huxtable8 Aug 2009, 23:416102g9419
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsPeter Fogg8 Aug 2009, 22:106996g9418
Re: Proposed FULL RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Re:Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsNavList Messages8 Aug 2009, 17:5314593g9417
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance.Hanno Ix8 Aug 2009, 17:1519270g9416
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsPeter Hakel8 Aug 2009, 16:2911600g9415
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsJeremy C8 Aug 2009, 14:058200g9414
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsJeremy C8 Aug 2009, 13:5617215g9413
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsGeorge Huxtable8 Aug 2009, 13:366242g9412
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance.George Huxtable8 Aug 2009, 13:128278g9411
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsPeter Hakel8 Aug 2009, 03:5416082g9410
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsPeter Hakel8 Aug 2009, 03:5024952g9409
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance. Was- Re: Working a lunarHanno Ix8 Aug 2009, 03:0619834g9408
Re: Modification to 2102-DBrad Morris7 Aug 2009, 23:0418616g9407
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DGary LaPook7 Aug 2009, 22:2015577g9406
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DBrad Morris7 Aug 2009, 19:2410131g9405
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DGreg Rudzinski7 Aug 2009, 18:468072g9404
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance. Was- Re: Working a lunarBrad Morris7 Aug 2009, 16:2310085g9403
Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance. Was- Re: Working a lunarGeorge Huxtable7 Aug 2009, 15:076891g9402
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance. Was- Re: Working a lunarHenry Halboth7 Aug 2009, 15:068560g9401
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance. Was- Re: Working a lunarBrad Morris7 Aug 2009, 14:2511699g9400
Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance. Was- Re: Working a lunarGeorge Huxtable7 Aug 2009, 14:158097g9399
Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance. Was- Re: Working a lunarGeorge Huxtable7 Aug 2009, 13:598894g9398
Modifacation to 2102-DByron Franklin6 Aug 2009, 19:408109g9397
Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance. Was- Re: Working a lunarGeorge Huxtable7 Aug 2009, 09:3614209g9396
Re: Working a lunar - a PSHanno Ix7 Aug 2009, 00:3021721g9395
Re: Working a lunar - a PSGeorge Huxtable7 Aug 2009, 00:0210829g9394
Re: Working a lunar - a PSHanno Ix6 Aug 2009, 23:3819154g9393
Re: Working a lunar - a PSBrad Morris6 Aug 2009, 20:3420375g9392
Re: Working a lunarChristian Scheele6 Aug 2009, 20:3029175g9391
Re: Single-body fix methodChristian Scheele6 Aug 2009, 20:0316918g9390
Re: Working a lunarChristian Scheele6 Aug 2009, 19:5034073g9389
Re: Working a lunarHanno Ix6 Aug 2009, 17:3423413g9388
Re: Single-body fix methodJeremy C6 Aug 2009, 13:4715205g9387
Re: Working a lunarGeorge Huxtable6 Aug 2009, 07:1410103g9386
Re: Working a lunarGeorge Huxtable6 Aug 2009, 08:2911827g9385
Re: Working a lunar - a PSHanno Ix6 Aug 2009, 06:3918273g9384
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsJeremy C6 Aug 2009, 06:226130g9383
Re: Working a lunarHanno Ix6 Aug 2009, 05:5714988g9382
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Bill B6 Aug 2009, 05:485557g9381
Re: Green flashesHanno Ix6 Aug 2009, 03:5113583g9380
Re: Green flashesScott Owen6 Aug 2009, 03:318636g9379
Manufacture of BygravesGary LaPook6 Aug 2009, 03:198330g9378
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGary LaPook5 Aug 2009, 22:3911219g9377
Single-body fix methodChristian Scheele5 Aug 2009, 19:098726g9376
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterChristian Scheele5 Aug 2009, 18:5911139g9375
Re: Franklin Piloting TechniqueBrad Morris5 Aug 2009, 18:276536g9374
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Ken Gebhart5 Aug 2009, 18:205466g9373
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsNavList Messages5 Aug 2009, 17:308126g9372
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsPeter Hakel5 Aug 2009, 17:0177799g9371
Re: The BygraveHanno Ix5 Aug 2009, 16:169684g9370
Re: Green flashesGreg R_5 Aug 2009, 16:0552104g9369
Green flashesJeremy C5 Aug 2009, 16:0150271g9368
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Marcel Tschudin5 Aug 2009, 14:447199g9367
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Ken Gebhart5 Aug 2009, 14:146925g9366
Re: The BygraveDouglas Denny5 Aug 2009, 13:445735g9365
Re: Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorBrad Morris5 Aug 2009, 13:4411030g9364
Re: Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorBrad Morris5 Aug 2009, 13:297294g9363
Re: Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorGary LaPook5 Aug 2009, 09:258392g9362
Re: Franklin Piloting TechniqueByron Franklin5 Aug 2009, 01:47384120g9361
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?James N Wilson5 Aug 2009, 05:256609g9360
Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsJeremy C5 Aug 2009, 03:3343924g9359
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Scott Owen5 Aug 2009, 03:147356g9358
Re: Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorGreg Rudzinski5 Aug 2009, 01:479907g9357
Re: The BygraveHanno Ix5 Aug 2009, 01:2912777g9356
Re: Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorIrv Haworth5 Aug 2009, 01:0910787g9355
Re: Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorGreg Rudzinski5 Aug 2009, 00:458253g9354
Re: Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorPeter Hakel5 Aug 2009, 00:089926g9353
Re: The BygraveDouglas Denny4 Aug 2009, 23:436389g9352
Re: Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorGreg Rudzinski4 Aug 2009, 23:367714g9351
Plotting in Magnetic vs TrueLu Abel4 Aug 2009, 23:316472g9350
DR PlottingLu Abel4 Aug 2009, 23:296019g9349
Re: Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorLu Abel4 Aug 2009, 22:3315143g9348
Re: Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorGreg Rudzinski4 Aug 2009, 21:337106g9347
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Hewitt Schlereth4 Aug 2009, 21:288344g9346
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Marcel Tschudin4 Aug 2009, 19:537510g9345
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?George Huxtable4 Aug 2009, 19:348287g9344
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Greg Rudzinski4 Aug 2009, 19:186394g9343
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Brad Morris4 Aug 2009, 19:167300g9342
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Marcel Tschudin4 Aug 2009, 19:116664g9341
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?George Huxtable4 Aug 2009, 19:095537g9340
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?George Huxtable4 Aug 2009, 19:026122g9339
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?George Huxtable4 Aug 2009, 18:546315g9338
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Marcel Tschudin4 Aug 2009, 18:578511g9337
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Brad Morris4 Aug 2009, 18:168153g9336
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Greg Rudzinski4 Aug 2009, 18:105795g9335
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Marcel Tschudin4 Aug 2009, 18:067235g9334
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?George Huxtable4 Aug 2009, 17:465438g9333
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Greg Rudzinski4 Aug 2009, 17:345927g9332
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?George Huxtable4 Aug 2009, 17:278746g9331
Re: Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorBrad Morris4 Aug 2009, 17:207994g9330
Re: Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorGreg Rudzinski4 Aug 2009, 17:025849g9329
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Marcel Tschudin4 Aug 2009, 16:007136g9328
Re: Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorBrad Morris4 Aug 2009, 15:416946g9327
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Brad Morris4 Aug 2009, 15:378422g9326
(Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?W F Jones4 Aug 2009, 15:237044g9325
Re: The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?George Huxtable4 Aug 2009, 15:135356g9324
Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorGreg Rudzinski4 Aug 2009, 15:075815g9323
Re: The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?George Huxtable4 Aug 2009, 15:035250g9322
The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?W F Jones4 Aug 2009, 13:266675g9321
A lunarian at work (test upload)Frank Reed4 Aug 2009, 11:2262994g9320
Polaris LOPGary LaPook4 Aug 2009, 08:346996g9319
Re: Advice on SextantBill Morris4 Aug 2009, 08:186851g9318
Re: Advice on SextantC Sellars3 Aug 2009, 23:436831g9317
Re: Advice on SextantJames N Wilson3 Aug 2009, 23:466568g9316
Re: Advice on SextantGreg Rudzinski3 Aug 2009, 23:196829g9315
Re: Advice on SextantGreg Rudzinski3 Aug 2009, 19:326697g9314
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGary LaPook3 Aug 2009, 17:1412038g9313
Advice on SextantPeter Hollings3 Aug 2009, 16:2111057g9312
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterChristian Scheele3 Aug 2009, 13:226498g9311
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGary LaPook3 Aug 2009, 08:4315660g9310
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGary LaPook3 Aug 2009, 08:227785g9309
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGreg R_3 Aug 2009, 02:2723268g9308
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGary LaPook2 Aug 2009, 23:4451322g9307
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGary LaPook2 Aug 2009, 23:2735277g9306
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterTom Sult2 Aug 2009, 23:1146964g9305
Franklin Piloting TechniqueByron Franklin2 Aug 2009, 21:0311429g9304
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGary LaPook2 Aug 2009, 23:0345374g9303
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGreg Rudzinski2 Aug 2009, 22:289492g9302
Re: Working a lunarPaul Hirose2 Aug 2009, 22:136749g9301
Re: almanac computationsPaul Hirose2 Aug 2009, 22:115506g9300
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterTom Sult2 Aug 2009, 21:3818441g9299
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGreg R_2 Aug 2009, 20:5819286g9298
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGreg Rudzinski2 Aug 2009, 19:1615102g9297
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGary LaPook2 Aug 2009, 18:1833579g9296
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterHewitt Schlereth2 Aug 2009, 17:0810857g9295
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGary LaPook2 Aug 2009, 16:037956g9294
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGary LaPook2 Aug 2009, 15:577581g9293
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGary LaPook2 Aug 2009, 15:357562g9292
Re: nautical almanac information neededFrank Reed2 Aug 2009, 00:318360g9291
Nautical almanac information neededGeorge Huxtable1 Aug 2009, 22:555747g9290
Re: ebbco sextantGeorge Huxtable1 Aug 2009, 23:348018g9289
Re: Periscopic Sextant. Henry Hughes and SonDouglas Simpson1 Aug 2009, 23:2312016g9288
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterPaul Brewer1 Aug 2009, 22:386299g9287
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterDouglas Denny1 Aug 2009, 17:3511702g9286
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterTom Sult1 Aug 2009, 16:266054g9285
Re: The BygraveHanno Ix1 Aug 2009, 03:4013246g9283
Re: The BygraveHanno Ix1 Aug 2009, 03:3812627g9282
Bygrave and ChichesterGary LaPook1 Aug 2009, 01:596626g9281
Re: Airbus celestial portholeGary LaPook1 Aug 2009, 01:497338g9280
Piloting and Bowditch.Byron Franklin1 Aug 2009, 00:525341g9279
Re: Periscopic Sextant. Henry Hughes and SonGary LaPook1 Aug 2009, 00:3412332g9277
Re: The BygraveGary LaPook1 Aug 2009, 00:247000g9276
Re: The BygraveGary LaPook1 Aug 2009, 00:236227g9275

Index includes 381 messages.

NavList

What is NavList?

Join NavList

Name:
(please, no nicknames or handles)
Email:
Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
Yes No

You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

Posting Code

Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
Email:

Email Settings

Posting Code:

Custom Index

Subject:
Author:
Start date: (yyyymm dd)
End date: (yyyymm dd)

Visit this site
Visit this site
Visit this site
Visit this site
Visit this site
Visit this site