Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Position-Finding

2009

Index includes 4498 messages. Sorted by message ID, in descending order.
SubjectAuthorDate (UT)SizeID
Re: long s character in old textGeorge Huxtable31 Dec 2009, 22:087679g11370
Re: long s character in old textPaul Hirose31 Dec 2009, 19:178282g11369
Re: long s character in old textGeorge Huxtable31 Dec 2009, 12:0511681g11368
Long s character in old textPaul Hirose31 Dec 2009, 06:588283g11367
Re: Greenwich symposium on History of NavigationGeorge Huxtable29 Dec 2009, 17:547934g11366
Re: Course Changing in the NavyByron Franklin28 Dec 2009, 17:4713575g11365
Re: Calibrating bubble sextantsGary LaPook27 Dec 2009, 22:208164g11364
Calibrating bubble sextantsGary LaPook27 Dec 2009, 22:077681g11363
Obituary: Mike Richey. Solo Navigator of 'Jester'.Douglas Denny26 Dec 2009, 12:557611g11362
Re: Re.Sextant Shots in FlightGary LaPook26 Dec 2009, 06:207004g11361
Re.Sextant Shots in FlightNavList Messages25 Dec 2009, 23:366954g11360
Re: Semi-diameter in the Nautical AlmanacBill B25 Dec 2009, 05:186234g11359
Re: Sextant shots in flight on January 9th and/or January 10th, 2010Tom Sult25 Dec 2009, 03:417998g11358
Re: Sextant shots in flight on January 9th and/or January 10th, 2010Gary LaPook25 Dec 2009, 01:357826g11357
Re: Sextant shots in flight on January 9th and/or January 10th, 2010Douglas Denny25 Dec 2009, 01:177412g11356
Re: Sextant shots in flight on January 9th and/or January 10th, 2010Frank Reed24 Dec 2009, 23:326984g11355
Re: Almanac status and historyPaul Hirose24 Dec 2009, 22:077443g11354
Sextant shots in flight on January 9th and/or January 10th, 2010Gary LaPook24 Dec 2009, 21:296960g11353
Re: navigation by soundings.George Huxtable24 Dec 2009, 14:259295g11352
Re: re Navigation by Soundings.N S Gurnell24 Dec 2009, 13:0911001g11351
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsKen Gebhart24 Dec 2009, 03:2922349g11350
Re: re Navigation by Soundings.Lu Abel24 Dec 2009, 02:079484g11349
Re Navigation by Soundings.N S Gurnell24 Dec 2009, 01:207196g11348
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsGary LaPook24 Dec 2009, 01:006045g11347
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsLu Abel23 Dec 2009, 22:036562g11346
Re: navigation by soundings.Lu Abel23 Dec 2009, 22:007423g11345
Re: Historical Lunars : take in account 'delta-T' or ignore it ?Antoine Couëtte23 Dec 2009, 21:307303g11344
Re: Almanac status and historyAntoine Couëtte23 Dec 2009, 21:2813400g11343
Running fix courseByron Franklin23 Dec 2009, 19:266932g11341
Re: Almanac status and historyFrank Reed23 Dec 2009, 19:2410898g11340
Re: Historical Lunars : take in account 'delta-T' or ignore it ?Frank Reed23 Dec 2009, 18:547025g11339
Re: Almanac status and historyAntoine Couëtte23 Dec 2009, 18:008226g11338
Re: Historical Lunars : take in account 'delta-T' or ignore it ?Antoine Couëtte23 Dec 2009, 17:449305g11337
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsGary LaPook23 Dec 2009, 17:3818346g11336
Re: navigation by soundings.John H23 Dec 2009, 17:2011745g11335
Re: navigation by soundings.Douglas Denny23 Dec 2009, 16:557673g11334
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsDouglas Denny23 Dec 2009, 16:507722g11333
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsGary LaPook23 Dec 2009, 04:4022669g11332
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsKen Gebhart23 Dec 2009, 03:1119535g11331
Re: Semi-diameter in the Nautical AlmanacGary LaPook23 Dec 2009, 02:069736g11330
Re: Semi-diameter in the Nautical AlmanacFrank Reed23 Dec 2009, 01:4414831g11329
Re: Semi-diameter in the Nautical AlmanacGreg Rudzinski22 Dec 2009, 23:1015010g11328
Running fix courseByron Franklin22 Dec 2009, 22:169644g11327
Running fix course.Byron Franklin22 Dec 2009, 22:117781g11326
Re: Semi-diameter in the Nautical AlmanacGary LaPook22 Dec 2009, 21:1113923g11325
Re: Eprf Vs, TrfJohn Karl22 Dec 2009, 20:177724g11324
Re: Eprf Vs, TrfNavList Messages22 Dec 2009, 16:259370g11323
Re: Semi-diameter in the Nautical AlmanacGreg Rudzinski22 Dec 2009, 13:5712869g11322
Re: Semi-diameter in the Nautical AlmanacFred Hebard22 Dec 2009, 13:267320g11321
Re: Semi-diameter in the Nautical AlmanacGary LaPook22 Dec 2009, 13:172558787g11320
Re: Semi-diameter in the Nautical AlmanacGary LaPook22 Dec 2009, 12:3612242g11319
Eprf Vs, TrfJohn Karl22 Dec 2009, 03:2610808g11318
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsMike Burkes22 Dec 2009, 02:0728054g11317
Re: Happy Winter Solstice!NavList Messages21 Dec 2009, 23:536963g11316
Re: Eprf Vs, TrfNavList Messages21 Dec 2009, 20:237460g11315
Re: Celestial Navigation Through CloudsBill Morris21 Dec 2009, 21:447425g11314
Happy Winter Solstice!Dan Allen21 Dec 2009, 16:175697g11313
Re: navigation by soundings.Hewitt Schlereth21 Dec 2009, 14:2510150g11312
Navigation by soundings.George Huxtable21 Dec 2009, 09:588701g11311
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsGary LaPook21 Dec 2009, 07:2418243g11310
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsGary LaPook21 Dec 2009, 07:2317945g11309
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsGary LaPook21 Dec 2009, 02:5618187g11308
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsGreg R_21 Dec 2009, 02:0527232g11307
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsGary LaPook20 Dec 2009, 22:3725106g11306
Re: Hundreds of millions of GPS receiversGreg R_20 Dec 2009, 21:388615g11305
Re: Hundreds of millions of GPS receiversRichard B. Langley20 Dec 2009, 21:359263g11304
Re: Hundreds of millions of GPS receiversBruce Hamilton20 Dec 2009, 21:206778g11303
Re: Hundreds of millions of GPS receiversBruce Hamilton20 Dec 2009, 21:035744g11302
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsMike Burkes20 Dec 2009, 20:3523431g11301
Eprf Vs, TrfJohn Karl20 Dec 2009, 19:1473930g11300
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsGreg R_20 Dec 2009, 18:4114143g11299
Re: Eprf Vs, TrfRob M20 Dec 2009, 18:339301g11298
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsMike Burkes20 Dec 2009, 17:5218816g11297
Re: Question on currents and wavesJoe Schultz20 Dec 2009, 16:5110020g11296
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsGreg Rudzinski20 Dec 2009, 16:1912016g11295
Re: Question on currents and wavesJohn H20 Dec 2009, 14:4520213g11294
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsGary LaPook20 Dec 2009, 14:0011809g11293
Re: Pre-computed Altitudes and AzimuthsGary LaPook20 Dec 2009, 12:241456579g11292
Re: Pre-computed Altitudes and AzimuthsGary LaPook20 Dec 2009, 12:113274642g11291
Re: Eprf Vs, TrfGeoffrey Kolbe20 Dec 2009, 09:336931g11290
Eprf Vs, TrfJohn Karl20 Dec 2009, 00:56152940g11289
Eprf Vs, TrfJohn Karl20 Dec 2009, 00:54145705g11288
Re: Dreisonstok Compliments WeemsHewitt Schlereth20 Dec 2009, 00:267748g11287
Re: Question on currents and wavesGreg Rudzinski19 Dec 2009, 22:0210588g11286
Re: Question on currents and wavesGeorge Huxtable19 Dec 2009, 21:456428g11285
Re: Question on currents and wavesJohn H19 Dec 2009, 20:5416121g11284
Re: Question on currents and wavesGeorge Huxtable19 Dec 2009, 19:528179g11283
Pre-computed Altitudes and AzimuthsGreg Rudzinski19 Dec 2009, 18:55664267g11282
Re: Question on currents and wavesJohn H19 Dec 2009, 14:226936g11281
Re: Question on currents and wavesGeorge Huxtable19 Dec 2009, 09:298644g11280
Re: Hundreds of millions of GPS receiversLu Abel19 Dec 2009, 06:407520g11279
Re: Hundreds of millions of GPS receiversLu Abel19 Dec 2009, 06:1418294g11278
Re: Hundreds of millions of GPS receiversLu Abel19 Dec 2009, 05:527823g11277
Re: Hundreds of millions of GPS receiversLu Abel19 Dec 2009, 05:517837g11276
Re: Question on currents and wavesFrank Reed19 Dec 2009, 03:089381g11275
Re: Question on currents and wavesFrank Reed19 Dec 2009, 02:517412g11274
Re: Question on currents and wavesFrank Reed19 Dec 2009, 02:369720g11273
Re: Question on currents and wavesJohn H19 Dec 2009, 02:129448g11272
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsFrank Reed19 Dec 2009, 02:099342g11271
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsGreg R_19 Dec 2009, 02:047847g11270
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsFrank Reed19 Dec 2009, 01:537936g11269
Re: Question on currents and wavesFrank Reed19 Dec 2009, 01:498260g11268
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsNavList Messages18 Dec 2009, 21:497903g11267
Re: Hundreds of millions of GPS receiversScott Owen19 Dec 2009, 01:126235g11266
Re: Hundreds of millions of GPS receiversScott Owen19 Dec 2009, 01:097227g11265
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsGreg Rudzinski19 Dec 2009, 00:387464g11264
Question on currents and wavesJoe Schultz18 Dec 2009, 23:567019g11263
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsBruce Hamilton18 Dec 2009, 21:445882g11262
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsMike Burkes18 Dec 2009, 20:568578g11261
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsGary LaPook18 Dec 2009, 20:437105g11260
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsTom Sult18 Dec 2009, 20:3112604g11259
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsBruce Hamilton18 Dec 2009, 20:066798g11258
Re: Celesital Navigation Through CloudsGary LaPook18 Dec 2009, 19:3210701g11257
Re: Question on currents and wavesJohn H18 Dec 2009, 19:167316g11256
Re: Celestial Navigation Through CloudsTom Sult18 Dec 2009, 18:096416g11255
Re: Question on currents and wavesDave Walden18 Dec 2009, 18:037156g11254
Re: Eprf Vs, TrfRob M18 Dec 2009, 16:419115g11253
Re: Hundreds of millions of GPS receiversKen Muldrew18 Dec 2009, 16:407505g11252
Re: Hundreds of millions of GPS receiversRichard B. Langley18 Dec 2009, 16:0410386g11251
Re: Question on currents and wavesJohn H18 Dec 2009, 15:4810637g11250
Re: Hundreds of millions of GPS receiversBruce Hamilton18 Dec 2009, 15:4515296g11249
Re: Question on currents and wavesJohn H18 Dec 2009, 15:4212732g11248
Re: Question on currents and wavesGeorge Huxtable18 Dec 2009, 15:228329g11247
Re: Hundreds of millions of GPS receiversRichard B. Langley18 Dec 2009, 15:219201g11246
Re: Question on currents and wavesJeremy C18 Dec 2009, 14:5710853g11245
Re: Hundreds of millions of GPS receiversJeremy C18 Dec 2009, 14:5010536g11244
Re: Question on currents and wavesJohn H18 Dec 2009, 14:4110854g11243
Re: Question on currents and wavesGeorge Huxtable18 Dec 2009, 11:007312g11242
Question on currents and wavesJoe Schultz18 Dec 2009, 08:2011280g11241
Re: Almanac status and historyAndrés Ruiz18 Dec 2009, 08:1159220g11240
Re: Teaching a Running FixJoe Schultz18 Dec 2009, 08:0949789g11239
Re: Eprf Vs, TrfFrank Reed18 Dec 2009, 07:467524g11238
Re: Celestial Navigation Through CloudsFrank Reed18 Dec 2009, 07:438852g11237
Re: Almanac status and historyFrank Reed18 Dec 2009, 07:3444693g11236
Celesital Navigation Through CloudsBruce Hamilton18 Dec 2009, 06:508154g11235
Re: Question on currents and wavesFrank Reed18 Dec 2009, 06:3210140g11234
Re: Hundreds of millions of GPS receiversBruce Hamilton18 Dec 2009, 06:256296g11233
Hundreds of millions of GPS receiversFrank Reed18 Dec 2009, 06:139297g11232
Re: Eprf Vs, TrfJohn Karl18 Dec 2009, 03:477148g11231
Re: Eprf Vs, TrfNavList Messages18 Dec 2009, 00:168312g11230
Re: Almanac status and history: WAS Historical Lunars : take in account 'delta-T' or ignore it ?James N Wilson18 Dec 2009, 01:087341g11229
Re: Eprf Vs, TrfJohn Karl18 Dec 2009, 00:026386g11228
Re: Eprf Vs, TrfJeremy C17 Dec 2009, 22:1777703g11227
Eprf Vs, TrfJohn Karl17 Dec 2009, 21:2468443g11226
Re: USN going paperless and celnavlessGary LaPook17 Dec 2009, 17:479680g11225
Re: Question on currents and wavesJohn H17 Dec 2009, 17:0526606g11224
Re: Matthew FlindersBrad Morris17 Dec 2009, 16:418246g11223
Re: Question on currents and wavesJohn H17 Dec 2009, 12:3315348g11222
Re: USN going paperless and celnavlessRichard B. Langley17 Dec 2009, 12:139354g11221
Re: ADMIN: confusion in reading messagesNavList Messages17 Dec 2009, 11:347323g11220
Re: Question on currents and wavesGeorge Huxtable17 Dec 2009, 10:4212862g11219
Re: Question on currents and wavesFrank Reed17 Dec 2009, 05:449661g11218
Re: USN going paperless and celnavlessJeremy C17 Dec 2009, 03:4216240g11217
Re: Why Not To Teach Running FixesKen Gebhart17 Dec 2009, 02:4311267g11216
Re: Question on currents and wavesJeremy C17 Dec 2009, 01:3114716g11215
Re: USN going paperless and celnavlessJoe Schultz17 Dec 2009, 00:2111420g11214
Re: ADMIN: confusion in reading messagesIrv Haworth16 Dec 2009, 23:5812227g11213
Question on currents and wavesJohn H16 Dec 2009, 23:137916g11212
Re: ADMIN: confusion in reading messagesJoel Jacobs16 Dec 2009, 11:4812910g11211
Re: USN going paperless and celnavlessJeremy C16 Dec 2009, 22:4012083g11210
Re: USN going paperless and celnavlessBruce Hamilton16 Dec 2009, 18:538148g11209
Re: ADMIN: confusion in reading messagesJoel Jacobs16 Dec 2009, 18:277487g11208
Re: USN going paperless and celnavlessLu Abel16 Dec 2009, 17:5018535g11207
ADMIN: confusion in reading messagesJoel Jacobs16 Dec 2009, 17:359330g11206
Re: USN going paperless and celnavlessJeremy C16 Dec 2009, 15:2317270g11205
Re: Matthew FlindersPeter Smith16 Dec 2009, 14:508328g11204
Re: Why Not To Teach Running FixesGary LaPook16 Dec 2009, 11:429674g11203
Re: Why Not To Teach Running FixesGeorge Huxtable16 Dec 2009, 11:139643g11202
Re: Why Not To Teach Running FixesAndrés Ruiz16 Dec 2009, 08:06606051g11201
Re: Almanac status and history: WAS Historical Lunars : take in account 'delta-T' or ignore it ?Antoine Couëtte16 Dec 2009, 06:0117517g11200
Re: Matthew FlindersPeter Fogg16 Dec 2009, 05:4911784g11199
Re: Matthew FlindersGary LaPook16 Dec 2009, 05:297518g11198
Re: USN going paperless and celnavlessLu Abel16 Dec 2009, 05:1013492g11197
Why Not To Teach Running FixesJohn Karl16 Dec 2009, 04:5177442g11196
Re: Historical Lunars : take in account 'delta-T' or ignore it ?Antoine Couëtte16 Dec 2009, 04:477965g11195
Re: Historical Lunars : take in account 'delta-T' or ignore it ?Antoine Couëtte16 Dec 2009, 04:3511448g11194
Re: Matthew FlindersFrank Reed16 Dec 2009, 04:257332g11193
Re: Photographic lunarsFrank Reed16 Dec 2009, 04:2220717g11192
Re: Semi-diameter in the Nautical AlmanacFrank Reed16 Dec 2009, 03:4312478g11191
Re: Historical Lunars : take in account 'delta-T' or ignore it ?Antoine Couëtte16 Dec 2009, 03:438434g11190
Almanac status and history: WAS Historical Lunars : take in account 'delta-T' or ignore it ?Peter Hakel16 Dec 2009, 03:3712049g11189
Re: Historical Lunars : take in account 'delta-T' or ignore it ?Greg R_16 Dec 2009, 03:3512998g11188
Re: Historical Lunars : take in account 'delta-T' or ignore it ?Frank Reed16 Dec 2009, 03:2910569g11187
Re: Historical Lunars : take in account 'delta-T' or ignore it ?Antoine Couëtte16 Dec 2009, 03:169549g11186
Re: Why Not To Teach Running FixesFrank Reed16 Dec 2009, 03:1249768g11185
Re: Historical Lunars : take in account 'delta-T' or ignore it ?Frank Reed16 Dec 2009, 02:4216228g11184
ADMIN: confusion in reading messagesFrank Reed16 Dec 2009, 02:119394g11183
Re: Historical Lunars : take in account 'delta-T' or ignore it ?Frank Reed16 Dec 2009, 01:5011306g11182
Matthew FlindersBrad Morris15 Dec 2009, 21:528514g11181
Re: Historical Lunars : take in account 'delta-T' or ignore it ?Paul Hirose15 Dec 2009, 21:518735g11180
Re: ephemeris & positional astronomy Windows DLLPaul Hirose15 Dec 2009, 21:497398g11179
Re: Why Not To Teach Running FixesJoel Jacobs15 Dec 2009, 19:3818726g11178
Re: Semi-diameter in the Nautical AlmanacGary LaPook15 Dec 2009, 19:331848388g11177
Re: Semi-diameter in the Nautical AlmanacGary LaPook15 Dec 2009, 19:29477950g11176
Re: Why Not To Teach Running FixesByron Franklin15 Dec 2009, 18:378563g11175
Why Not To Teach Running FixesJohn Karl15 Dec 2009, 18:18136823g11174
Re: ephemeris & positional astronomy Windows DLLPaul Hirose15 Dec 2009, 17:566112g11173
Re: Semi-diameter in the Nautical AlmanacAntoine Couëtte15 Dec 2009, 17:279170g11172
Re: misunderstandings: was Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesAntoine Couëtte15 Dec 2009, 16:425425g11171
Re: Dreisonstok Compliments WeemsGreg Rudzinski15 Dec 2009, 16:036079g11170
Re: Dreisonstok Compliments WeemsHewitt Schlereth15 Dec 2009, 14:406563g11169
Re: Dreisonstok Compliments WeemsHewitt Schlereth15 Dec 2009, 14:205121g11168
Re: misunderstandings: was Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesJoel Jacobs15 Dec 2009, 14:0315511g11167
Re: Photographic lunarsNavList Messages15 Dec 2009, 07:3613165g11166
Semi-diameter in the Nautical AlmanacGary LaPook15 Dec 2009, 08:50465185g11165
Re: ephemeris & positional astronomy Windows DLLAndrés Ruiz15 Dec 2009, 08:347587g11164
Re: Historical Lunars : take in account 'delta-T' or ignore it ?Antoine Couëtte15 Dec 2009, 08:2310396g11163
Re: Why Not To Teach Running FixesGary LaPook15 Dec 2009, 06:50583720g11162
Re: misunderstandings: was Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesGeoffrey Kolbe15 Dec 2009, 06:329362g11161
Re: misunderstandings: was Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesJoel Jacobs15 Dec 2009, 05:346683g11160
Re: Historical Lunars : take in account 'delta-T' or ignore it ?Paul Hirose15 Dec 2009, 05:108494g11159
Re: Why Not To Teach Running FixesLu Abel15 Dec 2009, 04:277109g11158
Re: Why Not To Teach Running FixesLu Abel15 Dec 2009, 04:0989220g11157
Re: Why Not To Teach Running FixesGeorge Huxtable14 Dec 2009, 23:067783g11156
Re: Teaching a Running FixTim McAnulty14 Dec 2009, 22:2613411g11155
Re: Dreisonstok Compliments WeemsGreg Rudzinski14 Dec 2009, 21:436201g11154
Re: Why Not To Teach Running FixesGeoffrey Kolbe14 Dec 2009, 21:469754g11153
Dreisonstok Compliments WeemsGreg Rudzinski14 Dec 2009, 20:505653g11152
Re: Why Not To Teach Running FixesJeremy C14 Dec 2009, 20:1558423g11151
Re: Historical Lunars : take in account 'delta-T' or ignore it ?Marcel Tschudin14 Dec 2009, 17:324976g11150
Why Not To Teach Running FixesJohn Karl14 Dec 2009, 17:2980436g11149
Re: Why Not To Teach Running Fixes yesRob M14 Dec 2009, 17:135569g11148
Re: Historical Lunars : take in account 'delta-T' or ignore it ?Antoine Couëtte14 Dec 2009, 15:4911432g11147
Re: Why Not To Teach Running Fixes yesJoel Jacobs14 Dec 2009, 14:0117122g11146
Admiral Jean Cras PlotterAntoine Couëtte14 Dec 2009, 13:411286707g11145
Re: Teaching a Running FixJürgen Hoefeld13 Dec 2009, 19:2611537g11144
Re: Historical Lunars : take in account 'delta-T' or ignore it ?Paul Hirose14 Dec 2009, 06:0315725g11143
Re: Why Not To Teach Running FixesLu Abel14 Dec 2009, 05:3253464g11142
Re: Why Not To Teach Running FixesLu Abel14 Dec 2009, 05:1729078g11141
Re: Teaching a Running FixLu Abel14 Dec 2009, 05:0611053g11140
Re: Photographic lunarsFrank Reed14 Dec 2009, 04:007109g11139
Re: Photographic lunarsFrank Reed14 Dec 2009, 03:457793g11138
Re: Photographic lunarsFrank Reed14 Dec 2009, 03:3910884g11137
Re: Photographic lunarsFrank Reed14 Dec 2009, 03:1014679g11136
Re: Why Not To Teach Running FixesPeter Hakel14 Dec 2009, 02:5811296g11135
Re: Historical Lunars : take in account 'delta-T' or ignore it ?Frank Reed14 Dec 2009, 02:5020190g11134
Re: Why Not To Teach Running FixesJohn Karl14 Dec 2009, 02:155405g11133
Non Electronic Sight ReductionGreg Rudzinski14 Dec 2009, 02:073693160g11132
Re: Teaching a Running FixJoe Schultz14 Dec 2009, 01:104876g11131
Re: Why Not To Teach Running Fixes THE CHANGES MADE WERE NOT AUTHORIZEDIrv Haworth14 Dec 2009, 00:5233701g11130
Re: Why Not To Teach Running FixesPeter Hakel14 Dec 2009, 00:3011592g11129
Why Not To Teach Running FixesJohn Karl13 Dec 2009, 23:2350638g11128
Re: Why Not To Teach Running Fixes THE CHANGES MADE WERE NOT AUTHORIZEDJoel Jacobs13 Dec 2009, 22:2729195g11127
Re: Historical Lunars : take in account 'delta-T' or ignore it ?Antoine Couëtte13 Dec 2009, 22:0810734g11126
Re: Why Not To Teach Running FixesIrv Haworth13 Dec 2009, 21:3822944g11125
Re: Historical Lunars : take in account 'delta-T' or ignore it ?Antoine Couëtte13 Dec 2009, 20:288499g11124
Re: Teaching a Running FixByron Franklin13 Dec 2009, 19:197273g11123
Re: Why Not To Teach Running FixesPeter Hakel13 Dec 2009, 19:0810525g11122
Re: Why Not To Teach Running FixesJoel Jacobs13 Dec 2009, 19:0717276g11121
Re: Why Not To Teach Running FixesLu Abel13 Dec 2009, 18:1115040g11120
Re: Why Not To Teach Running FixesJoel Jacobs13 Dec 2009, 17:4810688g11119
Re: Teaching a Running FixLu Abel13 Dec 2009, 17:186378g11118
Re: Teaching a Running FixRob M13 Dec 2009, 16:515486g11117
Why Not To Teach Running FixesJohn Karl13 Dec 2009, 16:2550499g11116
Re: Photographic lunarsNavList Messages13 Dec 2009, 09:227013g11115
Re: Photographic lunarsNavList Messages13 Dec 2009, 09:405980g11114
Re: Historical Lunars : take in account 'delta-T' or ignore it ?Paul Hirose13 Dec 2009, 05:349933g11113
Re: Teaching a Running FixPeter Hakel13 Dec 2009, 03:5113588g11112
Re: Teaching a Running FixByron Franklin13 Dec 2009, 01:247726g11111
Re: Teaching a Running FixByron Franklin13 Dec 2009, 01:129688g11110
Re: Teaching a Running FixTom Sult13 Dec 2009, 00:267479g11109
Re: Photographic lunarsDouglas Denny13 Dec 2009, 00:265019g11108
Re: Photographic lunarsDouglas Denny13 Dec 2009, 00:215219g11107
Re: Teaching a Running FixByron Franklin12 Dec 2009, 23:408732g11106
Re: Teaching a Running FixGary LaPook12 Dec 2009, 21:498218g11105
Re: Teaching a Running FixGuy Schwartz12 Dec 2009, 21:207092g11104
Re: Teaching a Running FixLu Abel12 Dec 2009, 21:036927g11103
Re: Photographic lunarsNavList Messages12 Dec 2009, 18:5912078g11102
Re: Photographic lunarsGreg Rudzinski12 Dec 2009, 20:189027g11101
Teaching a Running FixJoe Schultz12 Dec 2009, 20:025417g11100
Re: Nansen questionJohn H12 Dec 2009, 15:5128042g11099
Re: Nansen questionGeorge Huxtable12 Dec 2009, 15:239425g11098
Re: Nansen questionJohn H12 Dec 2009, 14:4715773g11097
Re: Photographic lunarsGeorge Huxtable12 Dec 2009, 11:4611339g11096
Photographic lunarsNavList Messages12 Dec 2009, 07:318111g11095
Re: Historical Lunars : take in account 'delta-T' or ignore it ?George Huxtable12 Dec 2009, 00:048694g11094
Re: Should all electronic navigation devices on a yacht be set to True or Magnetic?Derrick Young11 Dec 2009, 17:506460g11093
Re: Course Changing in the NavyByron Franklin11 Dec 2009, 17:539707g11092
Re: Should all electronic navigation devices on a yacht be set to True or Magnetic?Dan Allen11 Dec 2009, 17:374625g11091
Re: misunderstandings: was Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesGeorge Huxtable11 Dec 2009, 17:206426g11090
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesAntoine Couëtte11 Dec 2009, 16:116772g11089
Re: PLUS Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesJohn H11 Dec 2009, 15:1816720g11088
Historical Lunars : take in account 'delta-T' or ignore it ?Antoine Couëtte11 Dec 2009, 14:3717922g11087
Re: PLUS Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesJoel Jacobs11 Dec 2009, 14:3014267g11086
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesJoe Schultz11 Dec 2009, 13:165664g11085
Re: Nansen questionGeorge Huxtable11 Dec 2009, 12:008167g11084
Re: Course Changing in the NavyJoe Schultz11 Dec 2009, 10:469993g11083
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesAntoine Couëtte11 Dec 2009, 09:096142g11082
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesFrank Reed11 Dec 2009, 06:105388g11081
Re: Course Changing in the NavyJeremy C11 Dec 2009, 01:218668g11080
Re: Nansen questionGeorge Huxtable11 Dec 2009, 00:475377g11079
Re: Course Changing in the NavyLu Abel11 Dec 2009, 00:215663g11078
Nansen questionJohn H10 Dec 2009, 23:356488g11077
Re: Old almanac data on KindleFrank Reed10 Dec 2009, 23:115580g11076
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesGeorge Huxtable10 Dec 2009, 22:567124g11075
Re: Course Changing in the NavyBruce Hamilton10 Dec 2009, 22:249015g11074
Old almanac data on KindlePeter Hakel10 Dec 2009, 22:186456g11073
Re: Cell phone star finderBruce Hamilton10 Dec 2009, 21:5214800g11072
Re: Cell phone star finderTom Sult10 Dec 2009, 21:1912636g11071
Re: Course Changing in the NavyJeremy C10 Dec 2009, 21:187352g11070
Re: Course Changing in the NavyByron Franklin10 Dec 2009, 19:4410432g11069
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesGeorge Huxtable10 Dec 2009, 18:094743g11068
Re: Cell phone star finderBruce Hamilton10 Dec 2009, 17:4210984g11067
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesLu Abel10 Dec 2009, 17:265113g11066
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesJoel Jacobs10 Dec 2009, 16:0822469g11065
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesGeorge Huxtable10 Dec 2009, 15:2910321g11064
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesRichard B. Langley10 Dec 2009, 14:3811591g11063
Re: sky eventJohn H10 Dec 2009, 14:237225g11062
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesGeorge Huxtable10 Dec 2009, 12:508486g11061
Re: Out of Date AlmanacGary LaPook10 Dec 2009, 08:36271691g11060
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesFrank Reed10 Dec 2009, 06:516158g11059
Re: Out of Date AlmanacAndrés Ruiz10 Dec 2009, 06:406236g11058
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesLu Abel10 Dec 2009, 04:3413482g11057
Re: sky eventFrank Reed10 Dec 2009, 02:084975g11056
Sky eventGeorge Huxtable10 Dec 2009, 00:594412g11055
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesGeorge Huxtable10 Dec 2009, 00:2311348g11054
Re: Navy Navigation Regulation ManualJeremy C9 Dec 2009, 23:248655g11053
Re: Navy Navigation Regulation ManualGeorge Huxtable9 Dec 2009, 23:145718g11052
Course Changing in the NavyJeremy C9 Dec 2009, 23:1612959g11051
Re: Radio direction-findersGeorge Huxtable9 Dec 2009, 22:546656g11050
Re: Navy Navigation Regulation ManualLu Abel9 Dec 2009, 22:528314g11049
Re: Cell phone star finderJohn H9 Dec 2009, 22:419651g11048
Re: Navy Navigation Regulation ManualJeremy C9 Dec 2009, 22:376861g11047
Re: Navy Navigation Regulation ManualByron Franklin9 Dec 2009, 19:306688g11046
Re: Thompson mapping CanadaGeorge Huxtable9 Dec 2009, 19:164701g11045
Re: Navy Navigation Regulation ManualByron Franklin9 Dec 2009, 19:156236g11044
Re: Navy Navigation Regulation ManualByron Franklin9 Dec 2009, 18:585735g11043
Re: Thompson mapping CanadaKen Muldrew9 Dec 2009, 17:275733g11042
Re: Radio direction-findersJoe Schultz9 Dec 2009, 15:525373g11041
Re: Out of Date AlmanacGeorge Huxtable9 Dec 2009, 15:415837g11040
Re: Out of Date AlmanacAndrés Ruiz9 Dec 2009, 15:18107077g11039
Re: Out of Date AlmanacDouglas Denny9 Dec 2009, 15:055908g11038
Re: Cell phone star finderHewitt Schlereth9 Dec 2009, 14:475331g11037
Re: Navy Navigation Regulation ManualJoe Schultz9 Dec 2009, 13:097097g11036
Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.John H9 Dec 2009, 13:0829180g11035
Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesJoe Schultz9 Dec 2009, 13:039314g11034
Re: Thompson mapping CanadaJoe Schultz9 Dec 2009, 12:573877g11033
Re: Clarity of meaning: was [10918] Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesJohn H9 Dec 2009, 12:577026g11032
Re: Navy Navigation Regulation ManualJoe Schultz9 Dec 2009, 12:555232g11031
Re: Clarity of meaning: was [10918] Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesBill B9 Dec 2009, 11:213998g11030
Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.Gary LaPook9 Dec 2009, 10:2312912g11029
Are these still available?NavList Messages9 Dec 2009, 06:304592g11028
Re: Out of Date AlmanacGary LaPook9 Dec 2009, 06:117115g11027
Re: Out of Date AlmanacFrank Reed9 Dec 2009, 03:353960g11026
Re: Out of Date AlmanacJohn H9 Dec 2009, 03:257632g11025
Re: Out of Date AlmanacFrank Reed9 Dec 2009, 02:065423g11024
Cell phone star finderFrank Reed9 Dec 2009, 01:376284g11023
Re: Applications of Complex Analysis to Celestial NavigationRobin Stuart9 Dec 2009, 01:026174g11022
Re: Out of Date AlmanacHewitt Schlereth8 Dec 2009, 23:316610g11021
Re: Out of Date AlmanacGary LaPook8 Dec 2009, 22:4414193g11020
Re: Out of Date AlmanacJohn H8 Dec 2009, 20:0156317g11019
Re: Out of Date AlmanacHewitt Schlereth8 Dec 2009, 19:447591g11018
Re: Out of Date AlmanacGary LaPook8 Dec 2009, 19:307580g11017
Re: Navy Navigation Regulation ManualByron Franklin8 Dec 2009, 18:1610604g11016
Re: Out of Date AlmanacGreg Rudzinski8 Dec 2009, 17:405869g11015
Re: Out of Date AlmanacGreg Rudzinski8 Dec 2009, 17:355560g11014
Re: Out of Date AlmanacHewitt Schlereth8 Dec 2009, 17:335269g11013
Re: Out of Date AlmanacGreg Rudzinski8 Dec 2009, 17:256162g11012
Re: Out of Date AlmanacHewitt Schlereth8 Dec 2009, 17:236067g11011
Re: Out of Date AlmanacGreg Rudzinski8 Dec 2009, 13:435822g11010
Re: Out of Date AlmanacFrank Reed8 Dec 2009, 13:206403g11009
Re: Out of Date AlmanacGary LaPook8 Dec 2009, 11:36518239g11008
Re: Out of Date AlmanacFrank Reed8 Dec 2009, 08:266344g11007
Re: Out of Date AlmanacGary LaPook8 Dec 2009, 06:515840g11006
Re: Out of Date AlmanacFrank Reed8 Dec 2009, 04:495365g11005
Re: Out of Date AlmanacFrank Reed8 Dec 2009, 02:535083g11004
Re: Out of Date AlmanacGary LaPook8 Dec 2009, 02:425166g11003
Re: Out of Date AlmanacFrank Reed8 Dec 2009, 02:275977g11002
Re: Ageton on an Index CardGary LaPook8 Dec 2009, 01:26194104g11001
Re: Ageton on an Index CardGary LaPook8 Dec 2009, 01:1041893g11000
Out of Date AlmanacGreg Rudzinski8 Dec 2009, 01:105050g10999
Re: Navy Navigation Regulation ManualJohn H7 Dec 2009, 23:5516600g10998
Re: Navy Navigation Regulation ManualByron Franklin7 Dec 2009, 23:028605g10997
Re: Navy Navigation Regulation ManualScott Owen7 Dec 2009, 20:567815g10996
Re: Navy Navigation Regulation ManualGreg R_7 Dec 2009, 20:1517225g10995
Re: Navy Navigation Regulation ManualPeter Hollings7 Dec 2009, 19:288366g10994
Re: Ageton on an Index CardGreg Rudzinski7 Dec 2009, 18:355643g10993
Ageton on an Index CardJohn Karl7 Dec 2009, 17:2837223g10992
Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.Lu Abel7 Dec 2009, 17:234714g10991
Re: Ipod Touch / IPhone AppsTom Sult7 Dec 2009, 16:516000g10990
Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.Dave Walden7 Dec 2009, 16:245450g10989
Re: Navy Navigation Regulation ManualJeremy C7 Dec 2009, 16:2210843g10988
Plath Sextant information.George Huxtable7 Dec 2009, 15:506056g10987
Check 3George Huxtable7 Dec 2009, 08:144951g10986
Re: Finding latitude by length of day-condensed filesGary LaPook7 Dec 2009, 06:496350g10985
Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.Gary LaPook7 Dec 2009, 06:2115028g10984
KamalGary LaPook7 Dec 2009, 06:085028g10983
Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.Jeremy C7 Dec 2009, 04:1249378g10982
Re: Finding latitude by length of day-condensed filesGary LaPook7 Dec 2009, 03:016101g10981
Re: Finding latitude by length of day-condensed filesFrank Reed7 Dec 2009, 02:414287g10980
Re: Finding latitude by length of day-condensed filesGary LaPook7 Dec 2009, 02:303801g10979
Re: Finding latitude by length of day-condensed filesGary LaPook7 Dec 2009, 02:247673g10978
Re: Finding latitude by length of day-condensed filesFrank Reed7 Dec 2009, 02:165322g10977
Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.Gary LaPook7 Dec 2009, 01:5421801g10976
Re: Finding latitude by length of day-condensed filesGary LaPook7 Dec 2009, 01:565247g10975
Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.Lu Abel7 Dec 2009, 01:0135577g10974
Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.Lu Abel7 Dec 2009, 00:5330138g10973
Re: [Fwd: Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.]John H6 Dec 2009, 23:3010494g10972
Re: Finding latitude by length of day-condensed filesGary LaPook6 Dec 2009, 23:165183g10971
Re: Ipod Touch / IPhone AppsGary LaPook6 Dec 2009, 22:255614g10970
Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.Gary LaPook6 Dec 2009, 23:0315524g10969
[Fwd: Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.]Gary LaPook6 Dec 2009, 22:0112304g10968
Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.Gary LaPook6 Dec 2009, 21:409193g10967
Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.Irv Haworth6 Dec 2009, 20:4326849g10966
Re: Finding latitude by length of day-condensed filesGary LaPook6 Dec 2009, 19:595853g10965
Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.Lu Abel6 Dec 2009, 16:1226219g10964
Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.John H6 Dec 2009, 16:0124771g10963
Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.John H6 Dec 2009, 15:5441270g10962
Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.John H6 Dec 2009, 15:3622918g10961
Re: Finding latitude by length of dayJohn H6 Dec 2009, 15:3210185g10960
Re: Ageton on an Index CardDave Walden6 Dec 2009, 14:183931g10959
Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.Gary LaPook6 Dec 2009, 10:4824699g10958
Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.Gary LaPook6 Dec 2009, 10:4523879g10957
Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.Gary LaPook6 Dec 2009, 10:3623850g10956
Finding latitude by length of dayGary LaPook6 Dec 2009, 09:594168g10955
Re: Ageton on an Index CardGreg Rudzinski6 Dec 2009, 06:385094g10954
Re: Clarity of meaning: was [10918] Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesBill Morris5 Dec 2009, 21:394658g10953
Re: Ageton on an Index CardGary LaPook6 Dec 2009, 05:33196070g10952
Ageton on an Index CardGreg Rudzinski6 Dec 2009, 04:44193221g10951
Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.Lu Abel6 Dec 2009, 01:5821712g10950
Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.Lu Abel6 Dec 2009, 01:5422629g10949
Re: Radio direction-finders. was: Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.George Huxtable6 Dec 2009, 00:107784g10948
Re: Radio direction-finders. was: Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.Gary LaPook5 Dec 2009, 23:5817471g10947
Re: Radio direction-finders. was: Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.John H5 Dec 2009, 22:3914858g10946
Re: "Emergency Navigation" by David BurchJohn H5 Dec 2009, 22:0211381g10945
"Emergency Navigation" by David BurchFrank Reed5 Dec 2009, 21:326065g10944
Re: Ocean NavigatorMike Burkes5 Dec 2009, 21:054405g10943
Re: Breathtaking hypocrisy (not clarity of meaning)Greg R_5 Dec 2009, 20:038634g10942
Breathtaking hypocrisy (not clarity of meaning)Peter Fogg5 Dec 2009, 14:397763g10941
Re: Clarity of meaning: was [10918] Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesPeter Hakel5 Dec 2009, 16:417892g10940
Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.John H5 Dec 2009, 14:4220988g10939
Nav technical? Not necessarilyPeter Fogg5 Dec 2009, 15:108099g10938
Radio direction-finders. was: Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.George Huxtable5 Dec 2009, 12:397409g10937
Clarity of meaning: was [10918] Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesGeorge Huxtable5 Dec 2009, 11:5310111g10936
Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.Gary LaPook5 Dec 2009, 08:039018g10935
Re: Almost a sextantLu Abel5 Dec 2009, 04:233885g10934
Re: Construction of the Davies Concise TablesJohn Karl5 Dec 2009, 04:195011g10933
Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.Lu Abel5 Dec 2009, 04:0213036g10932
Re: Navy Navigation Regulation ManualByron Franklin5 Dec 2009, 03:348017g10931
Re: Almost a sextantDave Walden5 Dec 2009, 02:225026g10930
Re: Navy Navigation Regulation ManualByron Franklin5 Dec 2009, 01:226992g10929
Construction of the Davies Concise TablesNavList Messages4 Dec 2009, 18:455292g10928
Re: Almost a sextantFrank Reed5 Dec 2009, 00:225799g10927
Re: Almost a sextantBruce Hamilton4 Dec 2009, 23:296261g10926
Re: An interesting thing in Duckworks MagazinePeter Fogg4 Dec 2009, 23:045419g10925
Re: Almost a sextantFrank Reed4 Dec 2009, 22:575436g10924
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesFrank Reed4 Dec 2009, 22:426064g10923
Re: Flight 19 route: wrong coursePaul Hirose4 Dec 2009, 22:255843g10922
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesWolfgang Köberer4 Dec 2009, 20:494981g10921
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesWolfgang Köberer4 Dec 2009, 20:465084g10920
Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.Jeremy C4 Dec 2009, 20:4317669g10919
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesMichael Dorl4 Dec 2009, 20:426448g10918
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesFred Hebard4 Dec 2009, 20:274024g10917
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesWolfgang Köberer4 Dec 2009, 20:153872g10916
Almost a sextantBruce Hamilton4 Dec 2009, 20:095739g10915
Re: LORAN-C to be shut down.Bruce Hamilton4 Dec 2009, 19:4814450g10914
Ocean NavigatorAndrew Corl4 Dec 2009, 17:3420983g10913
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesGeorge Huxtable4 Dec 2009, 17:077644g10912
Re: Thompson mapping CanadaKen Muldrew4 Dec 2009, 16:305398g10911
Re: Thompson mapping CanadaAndrew Corl4 Dec 2009, 16:2211085g10910
An interesting thing in Duckworks MagazineAndrew Corl4 Dec 2009, 16:2021354g10909
LORAN-C to be shut down.Jeremy C4 Dec 2009, 16:099460g10908
Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesJoe Schultz4 Dec 2009, 15:575673g10907
Re: Thompson mapping CanadaKen Muldrew4 Dec 2009, 15:576276g10906
Navy Navigation Regulation ManualJoe Schultz4 Dec 2009, 14:346174g10905
Thompson mapping CanadaJoe Schultz4 Dec 2009, 13:588537g10904
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesLu Abel4 Dec 2009, 03:347648g10903
Navy Navigation Regulation ManualByron Franklin4 Dec 2009, 01:089788g10902
Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesJoe Schultz3 Dec 2009, 23:386940g10901
"RNP" Required Navigational PerformancePeter Fogg3 Dec 2009, 05:393525g10900
Re: Ho 214 ErrataHewitt Schlereth2 Dec 2009, 21:136292g10899
Re: Pub.229 GC-Calculation-basic informationHewitt Schlereth2 Dec 2009, 20:537306g10898
Ho 214 ErrataJohn Karl2 Dec 2009, 20:51292406g10897
Ho 214 ErrataJohn Karl2 Dec 2009, 20:484956g10896
Re: Pub.229 GC-Calculation distance and course.Guus Dekker2 Dec 2009, 20:165621g10895
Re: Pub.229 GC-Calculation-basic informationGary LaPook2 Dec 2009, 19:316849g10894
Re: Pub.229 GC-Calculation-basic informationJohn Karl2 Dec 2009, 18:595213g10893
Re: Pub.229 GC-Calculation distance and course.Hewitt Schlereth2 Dec 2009, 18:567359g10892
Re: Pub.229 GC-Calculation distance and course.John Karl2 Dec 2009, 18:474539g10891
Celestial navigation races?Christian Scheele2 Dec 2009, 16:306690g10890
Re: Pub.229 GC-Calculation distance and course.Hewitt Schlereth2 Dec 2009, 12:286910g10889
Re: Finding Howland IslandGary LaPook2 Dec 2009, 09:276899g10888
Re: Finding Howland IslandGary LaPook2 Dec 2009, 09:045940g10887
Finding Howland IslandGary LaPook2 Dec 2009, 08:2727962g10886
Re: Pub.229 GC-Calculation-basic informationGary LaPook2 Dec 2009, 05:264463g10885
Re: Pub.229 GC-Calculation-basic informationGary LaPook2 Dec 2009, 05:254807g10884
Re: Pub.229 GC-Calculation distance and course.John Karl2 Dec 2009, 03:375140g10883
Re: Pub.229 GC-Calculation-basic informationGuus Dekker1 Dec 2009, 23:055065g10882
Re: Pub.229 GC-Calculation-basic informationGuus Dekker1 Dec 2009, 22:534886g10881
Re: Pub.229 GC-Calculation-basic informationGuus Dekker1 Dec 2009, 22:294876g10880
Re: Pub.229 GC-Calculation-basic informationByron Franklin1 Dec 2009, 18:545180g10879
Re: Celesticomp VRonald van Riet1 Dec 2009, 15:195768g10878
Re: Amelia Earhart navigation- basic information & PICTURESJoel Jacobs1 Dec 2009, 14:1522584g10877
Re: Amelia Earhart navigation- basic information & PICTURESJoel Jacobs1 Dec 2009, 13:5519393g10876
Re: Amelia Earhart navigation- basic information & PICTURESRonald P Barrett1 Dec 2009, 13:3215381g10875
Huyghens timekeeper attempt.George Huxtable1 Dec 2009, 12:15202963g10874
Re: philosophical transactions available freeAndrés Ruiz1 Dec 2009, 11:0920830g10873
Re: Amelia Earhart navigation- basic information & PICTURESGary LaPook1 Dec 2009, 10:178054g10872
Re: Pub.229 GC-Calculation-basic informationGary LaPook1 Dec 2009, 09:593778g10871
Re: Amelia Earhart navigation- basic information & PICTURESGary LaPook1 Dec 2009, 09:44543305g10870
Re: Amelia Earhart navigation- basic information & PICTURESJackie Ferrari1 Dec 2009, 07:1913088g10869
Re: Amelia Earhart navigation- basic information & PICTURESScott Owen1 Dec 2009, 05:599142g10868
A busy NovemberFrank Reed1 Dec 2009, 03:224237g10867
Re: Amelia Earhart navigation- basic information & PICTURESGreg Rudzinski1 Dec 2009, 01:0512610g10866
Philosophical transactions available freeGeorge Huxtable1 Dec 2009, 00:255510g10865
Re: Amelia Earhart navigation- basic information & PICTURESRonald P Barrett30 Nov 2009, 23:38180408g10864
Pub.229 GC-Calculation-basic informationJohn Karl30 Nov 2009, 21:0499251g10863
Re: Pub.229 GC-Calculation distance and course.Gary LaPook30 Nov 2009, 20:537983g10862
Re: Pub.229 GC-Calculation distance and course.John Karl30 Nov 2009, 20:084879g10861
Re: Pub.229 GC-Calculation distance and course.John Karl30 Nov 2009, 20:004981g10860
Re: Pub.229 GC-Calculation distance and course.John Karl30 Nov 2009, 19:573896g10859
Re: Thompson mapping CanadaKen Muldrew30 Nov 2009, 16:487960g10858
Re: Thompson mapping CanadaKen Muldrew30 Nov 2009, 16:205310g10857
Re: Applications of Complex Analysis to Celestial NavigationAndrés Ruiz30 Nov 2009, 11:08282616g10856
Re: Ipod Touch / IPhone AppsFrank Reed30 Nov 2009, 03:265685g10855
Ipod Touch / IPhone AppsBruce Hamilton30 Nov 2009, 03:147658g10854
Re: Celesticomp VPaul Jackson30 Nov 2009, 01:4778375g10853
Re: Toizaki SextantNavList Messages29 Nov 2009, 11:275123g10852
Dreisonstok TablesGreg Rudzinski29 Nov 2009, 18:415052g10851
Re: Thompson mapping CanadaGeoffrey Kolbe29 Nov 2009, 16:256302g10850
Re: Thompson mapping CanadaJohn H29 Nov 2009, 15:379436g10849
Re: Thompson mapping CanadaGeorge Huxtable29 Nov 2009, 13:2810681g10848
Re: Amelia Earhart navigation- basic information.Gary LaPook29 Nov 2009, 12:044040965g10847
Re: Amelia Earhart navigation- basic information.Gary LaPook29 Nov 2009, 11:5211779g10846
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationGary LaPook29 Nov 2009, 11:491915713g10845
Re: Amelia Earhart navigation- basic information.Gary LaPook29 Nov 2009, 11:28163392g10844
Re: Thompson mapping CanadaGeoffrey Kolbe29 Nov 2009, 06:577329g10843
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationGary LaPook29 Nov 2009, 05:33342697g10842
Re: Celesticomp VGeorge K29 Nov 2009, 00:5875391g10841
Thompson mapping CanadaFrank Reed29 Nov 2009, 03:313971g10840
Re: Applications of Complex Analysis to Celestial NavigationRobin Stuart28 Nov 2009, 21:5147455g10839
Pub.229 GC-Calculation distance and course.Guus Dekker28 Nov 2009, 20:486142g10838
Re: Sextant ManufacturersBill Morris28 Nov 2009, 19:125730g10837
Re: Amelia Earhart navigation- basic information.Ronald P Barrett28 Nov 2009, 16:5327527g10836
Re: Celesticomp VPaul Jackson28 Nov 2009, 10:349503g10835
Re: Sextant ManufacturersGeorge Huxtable28 Nov 2009, 10:158126g10834
Amelia Earhart navigation- basic information.Gary LaPook28 Nov 2009, 08:2811167g10833
Re: Sextant ManufacturersGeorge Huxtable28 Nov 2009, 08:018157g10832
Re: Sextant ManufacturersNavList Messages28 Nov 2009, 05:556261g10831
Re: Transatlantic on the Royal Clipper and celnavJames N Wilson27 Nov 2009, 22:275449g10830
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationRonald P Barrett28 Nov 2009, 01:371907548g10829
Re: Transatlantic on the Royal Clipper and celnavJeremy C27 Nov 2009, 21:546628g10828
Transatlantic on the Royal Clipper and celnavGary LaPook27 Nov 2009, 21:441587724g10827
Re: Celesticomp VRonald P Barrett27 Nov 2009, 14:506262g10826
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationGary LaPook27 Nov 2009, 13:199934g10825
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigation and Coast Guard did?Gary LaPook27 Nov 2009, 12:3849277g10824
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationGary LaPook27 Nov 2009, 10:5210912g10823
Re: Kollsman averagersGary LaPook27 Nov 2009, 09:3915894g10822
Re: Flight 19 route: wrong courseGary LaPook27 Nov 2009, 05:3112811g10821
Re: Celesticomp VNavList Messages25 Nov 2009, 20:173747g10820
Re: Flight 19 route: wrong coursePaul Hirose27 Nov 2009, 00:286594g10819
Re: Kollsman averagersRonald P Barrett26 Nov 2009, 21:0923509g10818
Re: Flight 19 route: wrong courseGary LaPook26 Nov 2009, 02:5610354g10817
SOA now miles run and avg ktsIrv Haworth26 Nov 2009, 00:4915911g10816
Flight 19 route: wrong coursePaul Hirose25 Nov 2009, 22:568128g10815
Re: Kollsman averagersGary LaPook25 Nov 2009, 21:14185339g10814
Re: Kollsman averagersGary LaPook25 Nov 2009, 21:07690395g10813
Re: Kollsman averagersWerner Luehmann25 Nov 2009, 20:367425g10812
Re: Kollsman averagersGary LaPook25 Nov 2009, 19:247468g10811
Re: Kollsman averagersDouglas Denny25 Nov 2009, 10:124884g10810
Kollsman averagersGary LaPook25 Nov 2009, 05:525847g10809
Re: Periscopic Sextant w/ MountGary LaPook25 Nov 2009, 05:5112811g10808
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesGeorge Huxtable25 Nov 2009, 00:456924g10807
Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesJoe Schultz24 Nov 2009, 18:446890g10806
Re: Periscopic Sextant w/ MountNavList Messages24 Nov 2009, 05:185134g10805
Re: Day Time Jupiter ObservationFrank Reed24 Nov 2009, 02:255328g10804
Day Time Jupiter ObservationGreg Rudzinski24 Nov 2009, 00:284035g10803
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesGeorge Huxtable23 Nov 2009, 23:417331g10802
Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesJoe Schultz23 Nov 2009, 19:505735g10801
Re: Periscopic Sextant w/ MountRonald P Barrett23 Nov 2009, 13:008591g10800
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesGeorge Huxtable23 Nov 2009, 11:259455g10799
Re: Single-body fix methodNavList Messages19 Nov 2009, 21:415491g10798
Periscopic Sextant w/ MountNavList Messages20 Nov 2009, 23:465387g10797
Re: Admin: EVERYBODY please readFrank Reed23 Nov 2009, 01:3311033g10796
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesLu Abel23 Nov 2009, 01:319893g10795
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesGeorge Huxtable22 Nov 2009, 23:058744g10794
Re: Automatic deviation calculation by electronic compassesLu Abel22 Nov 2009, 19:3610689g10793
Re: Should all electronic navigation devices on a yacht be set to True or Magnetic?George Huxtable22 Nov 2009, 12:159195g10792
Re: Should all electronic navigation devices on a yacht be set to True or Magnetic?Lu Abel22 Nov 2009, 05:469888g10791
Re: Should all electronic navigation devices on a yacht be set to True or Magnetic?Lu Abel22 Nov 2009, 05:239743g10790
Re: Should all electronic navigation devices on a yacht be set to True or Magnetic?Greg Rudzinski22 Nov 2009, 04:384291g10789
Re: Should all electronic navigation devices on a yacht be set to True or Magnetic?Lu Abel22 Nov 2009, 04:213765g10788
Rickenbacker B-17 Pacific DitchingGreg Rudzinski22 Nov 2009, 01:024873g10787
Admin: EVERYBODY please readFrank Reed22 Nov 2009, 00:296443g10786
Recommended Article: Eddie Rickenbacker ... Lost in the Pacific OceanGreg Rudzinski21 Nov 2009, 23:0993058g10785
FW: FW: mv AmsterdamIrv Haworth21 Nov 2009, 21:1184711g10784
Oasis of the SeasPeter Hakel21 Nov 2009, 20:156061g10783
Change Of EmailJoel Jacobs21 Nov 2009, 12:375910g10782
Re: Azimuth Circle compass error.Nicolàs de Hilster21 Nov 2009, 09:278154g10781
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationJackie Ferrari21 Nov 2009, 08:3026202g10780
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationAntoine Couëtte21 Nov 2009, 07:125210g10779
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationGary LaPook21 Nov 2009, 04:583249414g10778
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationDouglas Denny20 Nov 2009, 23:295206g10777
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationDouglas Denny20 Nov 2009, 23:0923078g10776
Re: Azimuth Circle compass error.Joe Schultz20 Nov 2009, 22:426635g10775
Re: Azimuth Circle compass error.Byron Franklin20 Nov 2009, 22:286345g10774
Re: Difficult observationsGreg Rudzinski20 Nov 2009, 20:549187g10773
Re: Difficult observationsKen Gebhart20 Nov 2009, 20:328255g10772
Re: Difficult observationsBruce Hamilton20 Nov 2009, 18:2312137g10771
Re: Difficult observationsGreg Rudzinski20 Nov 2009, 18:137749g10770
Re: Difficult observationsRonald P Barrett20 Nov 2009, 17:5110624g10769
Re: Difficult observationsGreg Rudzinski20 Nov 2009, 17:436330g10768
Difficult observationsJeremy C20 Nov 2009, 17:175633g10767
Re: Azimuth Circle compass error.Jeremy C20 Nov 2009, 16:5511715g10766
Re: Azimuth Circle compass error.Jeremy C20 Nov 2009, 00:5619925g10765
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationRonald P Barrett19 Nov 2009, 23:3333322g10764
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationGreg Rudzinski19 Nov 2009, 23:0015609g10763
Re: aircraft drift; over wate.r Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationClive Sutherland19 Nov 2009, 22:398434g10762
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationGary LaPook19 Nov 2009, 21:1715253g10761
Re: aircraft drift; over wate.r Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationKen Gebhart19 Nov 2009, 20:526126g10760
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationKen Gebhart19 Nov 2009, 20:277454g10759
Aircraft drift; over wate.r Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationGeorge Huxtable19 Nov 2009, 19:355700g10758
Re: Azimuth Circle compass error.Greg Rudzinski19 Nov 2009, 19:2110530g10757
Re: Azimuth Circle compass error.Nicolàs de Hilster19 Nov 2009, 19:177997g10756
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationGary LaPook19 Nov 2009, 19:1058434g10755
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationRonald P Barrett19 Nov 2009, 18:1941360g10754
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationGreg Rudzinski19 Nov 2009, 17:5419467g10753
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationGary LaPook19 Nov 2009, 17:37974742g10752
Azimuth Circle compass error.Byron Franklin19 Nov 2009, 17:367939g10751
Shackleton's whiskyAndrés Ruiz19 Nov 2009, 15:216556g10750
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationKen Gebhart19 Nov 2009, 14:2320283g10749
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigation and Coast Guard did?Ronald P Barrett19 Nov 2009, 14:1441636g10748
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeAndrés Ruiz19 Nov 2009, 07:2916207g10747
Re: One-body fixAndrés Ruiz19 Nov 2009, 07:1782446g10746
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationGary LaPook19 Nov 2009, 05:5934223g10745
Re: Sumner Line of positionPeter Hakel19 Nov 2009, 04:008272g10744
Re: Etiquette/antique items for sale.Irv Haworth19 Nov 2009, 02:326110g10743
Re: Etiquette/antique items for sale.Frank Reed19 Nov 2009, 02:084396g10742
Re: Toizaki SextantFrank Reed19 Nov 2009, 02:004689g10741
Toizaki SextantJohn Karl19 Nov 2009, 01:264835g10740
Re: Sumner Line of positionDave Walden19 Nov 2009, 01:17549504g10739
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationGary LaPook18 Nov 2009, 23:44338761g10738
Etiquette/antique items for sale.Irv Haworth18 Nov 2009, 21:596714g10737
Re: AP terminologyByron Franklin18 Nov 2009, 17:445320g10736
Re: AP terminologyDouglas Denny18 Nov 2009, 01:186685g10735
Re: Fortunate Islands questionJohn H17 Nov 2009, 21:3410655g10734
Fortunate Islands questionJohn H17 Nov 2009, 21:249191g10733
Latitude from length of dayJohn H17 Nov 2009, 20:1820917g10732
Re: AP terminologyJeremy C17 Nov 2009, 19:5316370g10731
Re: Should all electronic navigation devices on a yacht be set to True or Magnetic?Greg Rudzinski17 Nov 2009, 19:438110g10730
Re: AP terminologyPeter Hakel17 Nov 2009, 19:3511997g10729
Re: Amelia movieLu Abel17 Nov 2009, 19:338820g10728
Re: Amelia movieGary LaPook17 Nov 2009, 17:506508g10727
Re: Amelia movieLu Abel17 Nov 2009, 17:234727g10726
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeJeremy C17 Nov 2009, 17:04271501g10725
Re: Should all electronic navigation devices on a yacht be s...Jeremy C17 Nov 2009, 16:079099g10724
Re: Changing Zone Descriptions at SeaJeremy C17 Nov 2009, 16:037322g10723
Re: Should all electronic navigation devices on a yacht be set to True or Magnetic?Peter Smith17 Nov 2009, 14:396604g10722
Re: Amelia movieDouglas Denny17 Nov 2009, 12:326250g10721
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationGary LaPook17 Nov 2009, 12:271757129g10720
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationGary LaPook17 Nov 2009, 12:07490961g10719
Re: Amelia movieGary LaPook17 Nov 2009, 09:415110g10718
Sumner Line of positionAndrés Ruiz17 Nov 2009, 08:3152087g10717
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeAndrés Ruiz17 Nov 2009, 08:30258808g10716
Re: Interpolation to latitudeArk Shvetsky17 Nov 2009, 03:214322g10715
Re: navlist - Google Groups: Message PendingFrank Reed17 Nov 2009, 02:063909g10714
Re: navlist - Google Groups: Message PendingFrank Reed17 Nov 2009, 02:024965g10713
Re: Changing Zone Descriptions at SeaGary LaPook17 Nov 2009, 01:5411058g10712
Re: Free GyroscopeGary LaPook17 Nov 2009, 01:385855g10711
Should all electronic navigation devices on a yacht be set to True or Magnetic?David Smith17 Nov 2009, 01:165735g10710
Re: Range by height beyond the horizonGreg Rudzinski17 Nov 2009, 00:036502g10709
Range by height beyond the horizonFrank Reed16 Nov 2009, 22:297711g10708
Re: Changing Zone Descriptions at SeaJeremy C16 Nov 2009, 22:1020016g10707
Marseilles table analysisJohn H16 Nov 2009, 21:561291570g10706
Mv AmsterdamIrv Haworth16 Nov 2009, 20:1411129g10705
Re: Changing Zone Descriptions at SeaHenry Halboth16 Nov 2009, 17:0316271g10704
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationGary LaPook16 Nov 2009, 10:40813173g10703
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationGary LaPook16 Nov 2009, 09:1810554g10702
Re: Free GyroscopeSubhendu Hati16 Nov 2009, 09:1818528g10701
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationGary LaPook16 Nov 2009, 08:161252411g10700
Re: Interpolation to latitudeJoe Schultz16 Nov 2009, 07:458353g10699
Navigation Weekend: June 4-6, 2010 at Mystic SeaportFrank Reed16 Nov 2009, 06:299778g10698
Re: St. Hilaire -- My TakePeter Hakel16 Nov 2009, 04:0310697g10697
Re: Free GyroscopePeter Hakel16 Nov 2009, 03:3318127g10696
St. Hilaire -- My TakeJohn Karl16 Nov 2009, 03:0811551g10695
Re: Interpolation to latitudeGreg Rudzinski15 Nov 2009, 20:309168g10694
Re: AP terminologyJeremy C15 Nov 2009, 20:1914151g10693
Changing Zone Descriptions at SeaJeremy C15 Nov 2009, 20:1212431g10692
Re: Plotting charts: WAS: Re:Jeremy C15 Nov 2009, 19:5313575g10691
Re: Interpolation to latitudeBruce Hamilton15 Nov 2009, 18:4416004g10690
Re: AP terminologyPeter Hakel15 Nov 2009, 18:2316894g10689
Re: AP terminologyGeoffrey Kolbe15 Nov 2009, 08:079173g10688
Re: Interpolation to latitudeGeorge Huxtable15 Nov 2009, 09:058061g10687
Re: AP terminologyPeter Hakel15 Nov 2009, 03:2511125g10686
Re: AP terminologyPeter Fogg15 Nov 2009, 02:458914g10685
Re: AP terminologyFrank Reed15 Nov 2009, 02:2710108g10684
Re: AP terminologyPeter Hakel14 Nov 2009, 21:3510229g10683
Re: AP terminologyPeter Hakel14 Nov 2009, 19:5120105g10682
Re: Choice of timepieceRichard B. Langley14 Nov 2009, 12:539933g10681
Ocean NavigatorMike Burkes14 Nov 2009, 11:534062g10680
Re: Free GyroscopeSubhendu Hati14 Nov 2009, 07:1514450g10679
Re: AP terminologyGeoffrey Kolbe14 Nov 2009, 08:338045g10678
Re: Russia and Zone TimeArk Shvetsky14 Nov 2009, 07:407602g10677
Re: Plotting chartsFrank Reed14 Nov 2009, 05:5612246g10676
A detailed explanation of NIST's time servicesLu Abel14 Nov 2009, 05:545627g10675
Another source of time informationLu Abel14 Nov 2009, 05:527307g10674
Augment your sad realityFrank Reed14 Nov 2009, 05:436601g10673
Plotting charts: WAS: Re:Peter Hakel14 Nov 2009, 05:4110923g10672
Re: As we debate GPS reliabilityFrank Reed14 Nov 2009, 05:387018g10671
As we debate GPS reliabilityLu Abel14 Nov 2009, 05:156190g10670
Re: Choice of timepieceLu Abel14 Nov 2009, 04:567771g10669
Re: AP terminologyJames N Wilson14 Nov 2009, 04:437297g10668
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeFrank Reed14 Nov 2009, 04:457938g10667
Re: Choice of timepieceFrank Reed14 Nov 2009, 04:347715g10666
And another minor mistake by Lu AbelLu Abel14 Nov 2009, 04:135582g10665
Re: Russia and Zone TimeFrank Reed14 Nov 2009, 04:119051g10664
Re: Choice of timepieceLu Abel14 Nov 2009, 04:006380g10663
Re: Choice of timepieceLu Abel14 Nov 2009, 03:599246g10662
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeFrank Reed14 Nov 2009, 03:588979g10661
Re: Choice of timepieceLu Abel14 Nov 2009, 03:5011578g10660
Re: Choice of timepieceLu Abel14 Nov 2009, 03:308420g10659
Re: AP terminologyFrank Reed14 Nov 2009, 03:276403g10658
Re: Choice of timepieceFrank Reed14 Nov 2009, 03:208084g10657
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeJohn Karl14 Nov 2009, 01:594346g10656
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeTom Sult14 Nov 2009, 01:5710711g10655
Re: Choice of timepieceDouglas Denny14 Nov 2009, 01:4710427g10654
Re: Choice of timepieceJeremy C14 Nov 2009, 01:307810g10653
Re: Choice of timepieceJohn Karl14 Nov 2009, 01:294624g10652
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeGary LaPook14 Nov 2009, 01:067627g10651
Re: Choice of timepieceLu Abel14 Nov 2009, 01:0410215g10650
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeDouglas Denny14 Nov 2009, 01:0512142g10649
Re: AP terminologyHewitt Schlereth14 Nov 2009, 00:1210755g10648
Re: Choice of timepieceLu Abel13 Nov 2009, 23:579207g10647
Re: Interpolation to latitudeGary LaPook13 Nov 2009, 23:4713069g10646
Re: AP terminologyPeter Hakel13 Nov 2009, 23:1614887g10645
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeFrank Reed13 Nov 2009, 22:498796g10644
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeFrank Reed13 Nov 2009, 22:299121g10643
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeGeoffrey Kolbe13 Nov 2009, 22:107771g10642
Re: Free GyroscopeFrank Reed13 Nov 2009, 21:538506g10641
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeJeremy C13 Nov 2009, 21:3118091g10640
Re: Time ZonesByron Franklin13 Nov 2009, 21:085121g10639
Re: Choice of timepieceJeremy C13 Nov 2009, 20:488587g10638
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeTom Sult13 Nov 2009, 20:386989g10637
Fw: Cactus Flight 1549 Accident ReconstructionN S Gurnell13 Nov 2009, 20:379101g10636
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeJohn Karl13 Nov 2009, 20:335699g10635
Re: Interpolation to latitudeJeremy C13 Nov 2009, 20:2618219g10634
Re: Choice of timepieceDouglas Denny13 Nov 2009, 19:2111027g10633
Re: Choice of timepieceJohn Karl13 Nov 2009, 17:394655g10632
Re: Interpolation to latitudeGary LaPook13 Nov 2009, 16:186527g10631
Re: Ebbco - Antares sextantKen Gebhart13 Nov 2009, 16:166287g10630
Re: Ebbco - Antares sextantHewitt Schlereth13 Nov 2009, 14:057806g10629
Russia and Zone TimeW F Jones13 Nov 2009, 13:116095g10628
Re: Interpolation to latitudeGeorge Huxtable13 Nov 2009, 12:416301g10627
Re: 'Intentional Error' Method of Navigating toDestination.Gary LaPook13 Nov 2009, 11:2611278g10626
Ebbco - Antares sextantNavList Messages13 Nov 2009, 11:086743g10625
Re: Interpolation to latitudeGary LaPook13 Nov 2009, 11:1611070g10624
Re: Interpolation to latitudeGary LaPook13 Nov 2009, 10:568239g10623
Free GyroscopeSubhendu Hati13 Nov 2009, 09:084637g10622
Re: 'Intentional Error' Method of Navigating toDestination.Gary LaPook13 Nov 2009, 10:4565193g10621
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeFrank Reed13 Nov 2009, 07:188375g10620
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeFrank Reed13 Nov 2009, 07:007598g10619
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeFrank Reed13 Nov 2009, 06:536856g10618
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeFrank Reed13 Nov 2009, 06:499231g10617
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeFrank Reed13 Nov 2009, 06:226138g10616
Re: Interpolation to latitudeHenry Halboth13 Nov 2009, 06:1917722g10615
Re: Wisconsin Maritime MuseumFrank Reed13 Nov 2009, 06:176588g10614
Re: Wisconsin Maritime MuseumFrank Reed13 Nov 2009, 06:148307g10613
Re: Time ZonesArk Shvetsky13 Nov 2009, 04:086403g10612
Interpolation for latitudeArk Shvetsky13 Nov 2009, 03:248340g10611
Re: Interpolation to latitudePeter Hakel13 Nov 2009, 01:5211447g10610
Re: Interpolation to latitudeDerrick Young12 Nov 2009, 21:428474g10609
Re: Interpolation to latitudeGeorge Huxtable13 Nov 2009, 00:098786g10608
Re: SOA vs PositionsGeorge Huxtable12 Nov 2009, 23:1110519g10607
Re: Choice of timepieceDouglas Denny12 Nov 2009, 23:078414g10606
Re: Choice of timepieceGary LaPook12 Nov 2009, 22:434707g10605
Re: Interpolation to latitudeGary LaPook12 Nov 2009, 22:214749g10604
EP along a single LOP: WAS: AP terminologyPeter Hakel12 Nov 2009, 22:0511795g10603
Re: Choice of timepieceJohn Karl12 Nov 2009, 21:524904g10602
Re: Interpolation to latitudeJoe Schultz12 Nov 2009, 21:0147365g10601
Time ZonesByron Franklin12 Nov 2009, 20:056795g10600
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threePeter Hakel12 Nov 2009, 19:5614188g10599
Re: SOA vs PositionsIrv Haworth12 Nov 2009, 19:528875g10598
Re: Choice of timepieceJeremy C12 Nov 2009, 18:598722g10597
Choice of timepieceDavid Lovett11 Nov 2009, 13:464719g10596
Re: 'Intentional Error' Method of Navigating toDestination.James N Wilson12 Nov 2009, 18:537321g10595
Re: 'Intentional Error' Method of Navigating toDestination.John Karl12 Nov 2009, 18:424809g10594
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeJohn Karl12 Nov 2009, 18:284636g10593
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeLu Abel12 Nov 2009, 17:3114423g10592
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threePeter Fogg12 Nov 2009, 16:1812111g10591
Re: Wisconsin Maritime MuseumJeremy C12 Nov 2009, 15:3210615g10590
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeJeremy C12 Nov 2009, 15:2710216g10589
Re: Wisconsin Maritime MuseumGary LaPook12 Nov 2009, 15:185419g10588
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeHewitt Schlereth12 Nov 2009, 15:137637g10587
Re: Wisconsin Maritime MuseumJeremy C12 Nov 2009, 14:248275g10586
Re: 'Intentional Error' Method of Navigating toDestination.Lu Abel12 Nov 2009, 04:416411g10585
Re: 'Intentional Error' Method of Navigating toDestination.James N Wilson12 Nov 2009, 04:237178g10584
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeJohn Karl12 Nov 2009, 04:005129g10583
Re: 'Intentional Error' Method of Navigating toDestination.Lu Abel12 Nov 2009, 03:366412g10582
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threePeter Fogg12 Nov 2009, 03:368228g10581
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeJohn Karl12 Nov 2009, 03:324940g10580
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeTom Sult12 Nov 2009, 03:256905g10579
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threePeter Fogg12 Nov 2009, 03:1310335g10578
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeJohn Karl12 Nov 2009, 02:554931g10577
Re: conning tower with a memorable numberArk Shvetsky12 Nov 2009, 02:356286g10576
Re: 'Intentional Error' Method of Navigating to Destination.John H12 Nov 2009, 02:328865g10575
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threePeter Fogg12 Nov 2009, 02:087134g10574
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeJames N Wilson12 Nov 2009, 02:007620g10573
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeIrv Haworth12 Nov 2009, 01:3512689g10572
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threePeter Fogg12 Nov 2009, 01:217824g10571
Re: Wisconsin Maritime MuseumJames N Wilson12 Nov 2009, 01:16637036g10570
Re: AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threeJames N Wilson12 Nov 2009, 01:087924g10569
Re: 'Intentional Error' Method of Navigating toDestination.James N Wilson11 Nov 2009, 12:325797g10568
Re: Wisconsin Maritime MuseumDouglas Denny11 Nov 2009, 23:067438g10567
AP terminology, WAS: 2-Body Fix -- take threePeter Hakel11 Nov 2009, 20:5314839g10566
Re: conning tower with a memorable numberLu Abel11 Nov 2009, 20:147461g10565
Re: 2-Body Fix -- take threePeter Hakel11 Nov 2009, 19:359556g10564
Re: 2-Body Fix -- take threePeter Hakel11 Nov 2009, 19:2814354g10563
Re: 2-Body Fix -- take threeGeorge Huxtable11 Nov 2009, 15:06477501g10562
Re: Wisconsin Maritime MuseumRob M11 Nov 2009, 14:554622g10561
Re: Wisconsin Maritime MuseumGary LaPook11 Nov 2009, 10:0010676g10560
Re: 'Intentional Error' Method of Navigating toDestination.Gary LaPook11 Nov 2009, 09:4412225g10559
Re: Wisconsin Maritime MuseumGary LaPook11 Nov 2009, 05:1010174g10558
Re: 2-Body Fix -- take threeFrank Reed11 Nov 2009, 04:167076g10557
Re: 2-Body Fix -- take threeJohn Karl11 Nov 2009, 03:195575g10556
Re: Wisconsin Maritime MuseumFrank Reed11 Nov 2009, 03:0811663g10555
Re: 'Intentional Error' Method of Navigating to Destination.Lu Abel11 Nov 2009, 01:398279g10554
Re: 'Intentional Error' Method of Navigating toDestination.Ark Shvetsky11 Nov 2009, 01:336919g10553
Re: conning tower with a memorable numberFrank Reed11 Nov 2009, 01:296791g10552
Re: Interpolation to latitudeArk Shvetsky11 Nov 2009, 01:146399g10551
Re: Interpolation to latitudeGeorge Huxtable10 Nov 2009, 23:307686g10550
Re: Interpolation to latitudeJoe Schultz10 Nov 2009, 22:5122957g10549
Re: 'Intentional Error' Method of Navigating to Destination.Hewitt Schlereth10 Nov 2009, 21:249354g10548
Re: 'Intentional Error' Method of Navigating to Destination.John H10 Nov 2009, 21:208624g10547
'Intentional Error' Method of Navigating toDestination.Douglas Denny10 Nov 2009, 21:079749g10546
Re: USS IntrepidByron Franklin10 Nov 2009, 17:416879g10545
Re: Wisconsin Maritime MuseumGary LaPook10 Nov 2009, 13:3012868g10544
Re: Wisconsin Maritime MuseumDouglas Denny10 Nov 2009, 12:456530g10543
Re: Wisconsin Maritime MuseumDouglas Denny10 Nov 2009, 12:3910212g10542
Re: 2-Body Fix -- take threeGeorge Huxtable10 Nov 2009, 08:377189g10541
Re: conning tower with a memorable numberLu Abel10 Nov 2009, 06:326247g10540
Re: conning tower with a memorable numberArk Shvetsky10 Nov 2009, 06:236499g10539
Re: Wisconsin Maritime MuseumArk Shvetsky10 Nov 2009, 06:186100g10538
Re: Interpolation to latitudeArk Shvetsky10 Nov 2009, 06:085786g10537
Re: Wisconsin Maritime MuseumGary LaPook10 Nov 2009, 05:536071g10536
Re: Wisconsin Maritime MuseumJames N Wilson10 Nov 2009, 05:47110064g10535
Re: Wisconsin Maritime MuseumGary LaPook10 Nov 2009, 05:316112g10534
Re: Interpolation to latitudeGary LaPook10 Nov 2009, 05:186017g10533
Re: conning tower with a memorable numberLu Abel10 Nov 2009, 03:378442g10532
Re: Wisconsin Maritime MuseumPeter Hakel10 Nov 2009, 03:1111168g10531
Re: Wisconsin Maritime MuseumArk Shvetsky10 Nov 2009, 02:3317889g10530
Re: Wisconsin Maritime MuseumArk Shvetsky10 Nov 2009, 02:327463g10529
Re: Interpolation to latitudeArk Shvetsky10 Nov 2009, 02:066540g10528
Re: Wisconsin Maritime MuseumFrank Reed10 Nov 2009, 01:567272g10527
Re: conning tower with a memorable numberFrank Reed10 Nov 2009, 00:108900g10526
Re: Interpolation to latitudeJoe Schultz9 Nov 2009, 22:296731g10525
Re: 2-Body Fix -- take threePeter Fogg9 Nov 2009, 17:277970g10524
Re: On the integration of location and dataGeorge Huxtable9 Nov 2009, 13:599990g10523
Re: Wisconsin Maritime MuseumGeorge Huxtable9 Nov 2009, 08:266567g10522
Re: Interpolation to latitudeArk Shvetsky9 Nov 2009, 07:226498g10521
Re: Interpolation to latitudePeter Fogg9 Nov 2009, 06:5710386g10520
Conning tower with a memorable numberArk Shvetsky9 Nov 2009, 06:455077g10519
Interpolation to latitudeArk Shvetsky9 Nov 2009, 06:306366g10518
Re: 2-Body Fix -- take threeAndrés Ruiz9 Nov 2009, 06:225213g10517
Re: Wisconsin Maritime MuseumFrank Reed9 Nov 2009, 06:057168g10516
Re: Wisconsin Maritime MuseumArk Shvetsky9 Nov 2009, 06:028239g10515
Re: Wisconsin Maritime MuseumPeter Fogg9 Nov 2009, 05:4416804g10514
Wisconsin Maritime MuseumFrank Reed9 Nov 2009, 05:3010365g10513
Re: 2-Body Fix -- take threeFrank Reed9 Nov 2009, 05:197445g10512
Re: 2-Body Fix -- take threeJohn Karl9 Nov 2009, 04:566789g10511
Re: On the integration of location and dataFrank Reed9 Nov 2009, 04:4516917g10510
Re: SOA vs PositionsGeorge Huxtable9 Nov 2009, 00:527720g10509
SOA vs PositionsIrv Haworth8 Nov 2009, 23:5928539g10508
Re: Can You Help?Jean-Philippe Planas8 Nov 2009, 22:1812086g10507
Can You Help?Bill Cope8 Nov 2009, 21:598967g10506
Re: 2-Body Fix -- take threePeter Hakel8 Nov 2009, 21:5711109g10505
Can you help?Bill Cope8 Nov 2009, 21:568921g10504
Re: 2-Body Fix -- take threeGeorge Huxtable8 Nov 2009, 19:389042g10503
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationJames N Wilson8 Nov 2009, 19:307085g10502
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationGary LaPook8 Nov 2009, 19:265076g10501
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationGary LaPook8 Nov 2009, 19:225411g10500
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationGary LaPook8 Nov 2009, 19:215041g10499
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationHewitt Schlereth8 Nov 2009, 16:007208g10498
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationJames N Wilson8 Nov 2009, 15:508520g10497
2-Body Fix -- take threeJohn Karl8 Nov 2009, 15:425077g10496
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationGary LaPook8 Nov 2009, 12:237489g10495
Re: Arabic "Al" and star namesFrank Reed8 Nov 2009, 02:1765448g10494
Re: Arabic "Al" and star namesFred Hebard7 Nov 2009, 21:185332g10493
Re: Container ship grounding in English ChannelIrv Haworth7 Nov 2009, 19:509405g10492
Re: Arabic "Al" and star namesFrank Reed7 Nov 2009, 19:045444g10491
Re: Container ship grounding in English ChannelLu Abel7 Nov 2009, 19:037680g10490
Re: Container ship grounding in English ChannelGeorge Huxtable7 Nov 2009, 18:478604g10489
Re: Container ship grounding in English ChannelDave Walden7 Nov 2009, 17:416446g10488
Re: Container ship grounding in English ChannelLu Abel7 Nov 2009, 15:568308g10487
Re: Arabic "Al" and star namesFred Hebard7 Nov 2009, 13:476668g10486
Re: Arabic "Al" and star namesJohn H7 Nov 2009, 12:507809g10485
Container ship grounding in English ChannelGeorge Huxtable7 Nov 2009, 12:078118g10484
Re: Arabic "Al" and star namesFrank Reed7 Nov 2009, 07:097869g10483
Re: Van Allen bio linkPeter Hakel7 Nov 2009, 02:0610441g10482
Re: Van Allen bio linkJohn H7 Nov 2009, 01:507310g10481
Van Allen bio linkPeter Hakel7 Nov 2009, 01:197834g10480
Re: Two-body fix caveatDave Walden6 Nov 2009, 23:3343854g10479
Re: Two-body fix caveatGeorge Huxtable6 Nov 2009, 22:026912g10478
Re: No Two-Body Fix ProblemsPeter Hakel6 Nov 2009, 21:089637g10477
Re: No Two-Body Fix ProblemsGeorge Huxtable6 Nov 2009, 20:299413g10476
Re: No Two-Body Fix ProblemsPeter Hakel6 Nov 2009, 19:0214010g10475
Re: No Two-Body Fix ProblemsPeter Hakel6 Nov 2009, 18:5215854g10474
Re: No Two-Body Fix ProblemsGeorge Huxtable6 Nov 2009, 17:257131g10473
Re: No Two-Body Fix ProblemsPeter Hakel6 Nov 2009, 09:0237425g10472
Re: No Two-Body Fix ProblemsPeter Hakel6 Nov 2009, 08:1511911g10471
Re: No Two-Body Fix ProblemsPeter Hakel6 Nov 2009, 07:5139097g10470
Re: No Two-Body Fix ProblemsJohn Karl6 Nov 2009, 02:515223g10469
Re: No Two-Body Fix ProblemsPeter Hakel6 Nov 2009, 02:3040021g10468
Re: No Two-Body Fix ProblemsPeter Hakel6 Nov 2009, 01:5041537g10467
Re: Arabic "Al" and star namesJohn H5 Nov 2009, 23:426622g10466
Re: SOA vs SMGIrv Haworth5 Nov 2009, 18:038451g10465
No Two-Body Fix ProblemsJohn Karl5 Nov 2009, 17:354671g10464
Re: Two-body fix caveatDave Walden5 Nov 2009, 16:0532319g10463
Re: Two-body fix caveatJohn Karl5 Nov 2009, 16:024574g10462
Re: American navigation.Joe Schultz5 Nov 2009, 11:037406g10461
Re: SOA vs SMGJoe Schultz5 Nov 2009, 10:597479g10460
Re: Two-body fix caveatAndrés Ruiz5 Nov 2009, 10:01280689g10459
Re: Two-body fix caveatGeorge Huxtable5 Nov 2009, 08:467296g10458
Re: Two-body fix caveatPeter Hakel5 Nov 2009, 02:4317915g10457
FW: SOA vs SMG/Inaccurate position reportsIrv Haworth5 Nov 2009, 01:106132g10456
Re: Re:AW: Re: Portuguese shipwreckquestionTom Sult5 Nov 2009, 00:1349529g10455
Re: Two-body fix caveatDave Walden5 Nov 2009, 00:096559g10454
Re: Two-body fix caveatGeorge Huxtable4 Nov 2009, 23:487616g10453
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionPeter Fogg4 Nov 2009, 22:559315g10452
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionPeter Fogg4 Nov 2009, 22:3610946g10451
Re: Re:AW: Re: Portuguese shipwreckquestionPeter Fogg4 Nov 2009, 22:1215995g10450
Re: SOA vs SMGIrv Haworth4 Nov 2009, 22:008137g10449
Re: Portuguese shipwreckquestionWolfgang Köberer4 Nov 2009, 20:4615903g10448
Arabic "Al" and star namesFrank Reed4 Nov 2009, 20:366868g10447
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionGreg R_4 Nov 2009, 20:269029g10446
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionJackie Ferrari4 Nov 2009, 20:1713237g10445
Re: Two-body fix caveatPeter Hakel4 Nov 2009, 20:1514243g10444
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionJohn H4 Nov 2009, 19:408997g10443
Re: Two-body fix caveatPeter Hakel4 Nov 2009, 19:36273055g10442
Re: Fw: Soa Vs SmgByron Franklin4 Nov 2009, 17:475848g10441
Re: On the integration of location and dataGeorge Huxtable4 Nov 2009, 17:449017g10440
Re: Dependence on GPSByron Franklin4 Nov 2009, 17:3510395g10439
Re: Two-body fix caveatPeter Hakel4 Nov 2009, 17:21320872g10438
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionWolfgang Köberer4 Nov 2009, 17:1049071g10437
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionPeter Fogg4 Nov 2009, 16:409578g10436
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionPeter Fogg4 Nov 2009, 16:3440138g10435
Re: Re:AW: Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionFred Hebard4 Nov 2009, 15:3614503g10434
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionGeorge Huxtable4 Nov 2009, 15:346729g10433
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionWolfgang Köberer4 Nov 2009, 15:0341502g10432
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionPeter Fogg4 Nov 2009, 14:5233601g10431
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionPeter Fogg4 Nov 2009, 14:4032358g10430
Re: Re:Portuguese shipwreck questionWolfgang Köberer4 Nov 2009, 13:4130821g10429
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionPeter Fogg4 Nov 2009, 13:0317977g10428
Re: Two-body fix caveatGeorge Huxtable4 Nov 2009, 11:1912908g10427
Re: Two-body fix caveatAndrés Ruiz4 Nov 2009, 10:12259615g10426
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionWolfgang Köberer4 Nov 2009, 09:5630436g10425
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionPeter Fogg4 Nov 2009, 07:3720144g10424
Re: Spitz SextantLu Abel4 Nov 2009, 06:306106g10423
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionFrank Reed4 Nov 2009, 06:296830g10422
Re: On the integration of location and dataFrank Reed4 Nov 2009, 06:259240g10421
Spitz SextantFrank Reed4 Nov 2009, 05:596549g10420
Re: Two-body fix caveatPeter Hakel4 Nov 2009, 05:327677g10419
Re: SOA vs SMGJoe Schultz4 Nov 2009, 04:396430g10418
Re: On the integration of location and dataTom Sult4 Nov 2009, 02:327548g10417
Re: Dependence on GPSTom Sult4 Nov 2009, 02:267681g10416
Re: Two-body fix caveatGeorge Huxtable4 Nov 2009, 00:096448g10415
Two-body fix caveatPeter Hakel3 Nov 2009, 20:051052866g10414
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionBrad Morris3 Nov 2009, 18:5816017g10413
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionJohn H3 Nov 2009, 18:3110308g10412
Re: On the integration of location and dataGeorge Huxtable3 Nov 2009, 18:006373g10411
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionGeorge Huxtable3 Nov 2009, 17:037643g10410
Re: On the integration of location and dataBrad Morris3 Nov 2009, 15:149855g10409
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionJohn H3 Nov 2009, 14:468428g10408
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionPeter Fogg3 Nov 2009, 10:5410902g10407
Re: On the integration of location and dataGeorge Huxtable3 Nov 2009, 10:137640g10406
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionGeorge Huxtable3 Nov 2009, 08:596250g10405
Re: On the integration of location and dataGreg R_3 Nov 2009, 07:197442g10404
Re: On the integration of location and dataLu Abel3 Nov 2009, 06:268576g10403
Re: On the integration of location and dataPeter Fogg3 Nov 2009, 05:458282g10402
Re: On the integration of location and dataLu Abel3 Nov 2009, 05:287034g10401
Re: On the integration of location and dataFrank Reed3 Nov 2009, 05:088587g10400
On the integration of location and dataPeter Fogg3 Nov 2009, 04:346382g10399
Re: American navigation.Greg R_3 Nov 2009, 04:346969g10398
Re: American navigation.Frank Reed3 Nov 2009, 02:436611g10397
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionFrank Reed3 Nov 2009, 02:257908g10396
Re: Dependence on GPSFrank Reed3 Nov 2009, 02:107833g10395
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionFrank Reed3 Nov 2009, 01:526610g10394
Re: American navigation.Frank Reed3 Nov 2009, 01:396675g10393
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionPeter Fogg2 Nov 2009, 20:1811333g10392
Re: Trying to reach Bill Morris (NZ)Bill Morris2 Nov 2009, 19:115695g10391
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionGeorge Huxtable2 Nov 2009, 16:529407g10390
Intrepid 10301Byron Franklin2 Nov 2009, 16:04865631g10389
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionJohn H2 Nov 2009, 11:3616885g10388
Re: American navigation.Mike Bowman2 Nov 2009, 09:367509g10387
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionGeorge Huxtable2 Nov 2009, 09:0810062g10386
Re: Trying to reach Bill Morris (NZ)Paul Brewer2 Nov 2009, 08:278416g10385
Re: Trying to reach Bill Morris (NZ)Jean-Philippe Planas2 Nov 2009, 06:5913266g10384
Trying to reach Bill Morris (NZ)Bill Cope1 Nov 2009, 20:179048g10383
Re: "The complete on-board celestial navigator" by BennettPeter Fogg2 Nov 2009, 02:3313269g10382
"The complete on-board celestial navigator" byBennettR Callum2 Nov 2009, 01:177298g10381
Re: Fw: Soa Vs SmgIrv Haworth2 Nov 2009, 00:158265g10380
Re: Fw: Soa Vs SmgTom Sult2 Nov 2009, 00:066318g10379
Re: Fw: Soa Vs SmgIrv Haworth1 Nov 2009, 23:546487g10378
Re: American navigation.Peter Fogg1 Nov 2009, 22:5511645g10377
Re: Dependence on GPSPeter Fogg1 Nov 2009, 22:3212800g10376
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionJohn H1 Nov 2009, 22:1883307g10375
Re: Dependence on GPSTom Sult1 Nov 2009, 21:0119335g10374
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionGeorge Huxtable1 Nov 2009, 20:557071g10373
Intrepid 10301Byron Franklin1 Nov 2009, 19:516200g10372
Re: Dependence on GPSLu Abel1 Nov 2009, 18:4617070g10371
Re: Dependence on GPSPeter Hakel1 Nov 2009, 18:4120724g10370
Re: Dependence on GPSLu Abel1 Nov 2009, 18:2020072g10369
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionJohn H1 Nov 2009, 17:4775823g10368
Re: Dependence on GPSTom Sult1 Nov 2009, 15:2810939g10367
Re: Dependence on GPSFred Hebard1 Nov 2009, 14:569198g10366
Re: Dependence on GPSTom Sult1 Nov 2009, 14:349332g10365
Re: Dependence on GPSTom Sult1 Nov 2009, 13:586863g10364
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionJohn H1 Nov 2009, 12:379364g10363
"The Long Voyage"George Huxtable1 Nov 2009, 12:1939945g10362
Re: American navigation.George Huxtable1 Nov 2009, 12:036785g10361
Re: Dependence on GPSDouglas Denny1 Nov 2009, 11:1713410g10360
Re: Dependence on GPSPeter Fogg1 Nov 2009, 07:1014003g10359
Re: Fw: Soa Vs SmgJoe Schultz1 Nov 2009, 07:037121g10358
Re: American navigation.Frank Reed1 Nov 2009, 06:438095g10357
Re: American navigation.Frank Reed1 Nov 2009, 06:268964g10356
Re: American navigation.Frank Reed1 Nov 2009, 06:0211234g10355
Re: Dependence on GPSFrank Reed1 Nov 2009, 05:057735g10354
Re: Dependence on GPSFrank Reed1 Nov 2009, 04:539615g10353
Re: Dependence on GPSFrank Reed1 Nov 2009, 04:239719g10352
Re: Dependence on GPSFrank Reed1 Nov 2009, 03:558365g10351
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionFrank Reed1 Nov 2009, 03:356726g10350
Re: American navigation.Peter Fogg1 Nov 2009, 01:107678g10349
Fw: Soa Vs SmgIrv Haworth1 Nov 2009, 00:1172389g10348
Re: American navigation.James N Wilson31 Oct 2009, 23:577120g10347
Re: American navigation.Douglas Denny31 Oct 2009, 23:318369g10346
Re: American navigation.John H31 Oct 2009, 23:219138g10345
Re: American navigation.George Huxtable31 Oct 2009, 22:0410854g10344
10301Byron Franklin31 Oct 2009, 20:366158g10343
Re: Dependence on GPSTom Sult31 Oct 2009, 14:5410717g10342
Re: Dependence on GPSJohn H31 Oct 2009, 13:1513880g10341
Re: Dependence on GPSPeter Fogg31 Oct 2009, 05:277609g10340
Re: Dependence on GPSPeter Fogg31 Oct 2009, 04:5113654g10339
Re: Dependence on GPSLu Abel31 Oct 2009, 03:0112490g10338
Re: Dependence on GPSLu Abel31 Oct 2009, 02:039645g10337
Re: American navigation.Frank Reed31 Oct 2009, 00:0710806g10336
Re: Dependence on GPSFrank Reed30 Oct 2009, 23:0111022g10335
Re: Dependence on GPSPeter Fogg30 Oct 2009, 19:0815585g10334
Re: Dependence on GPSTom Sult30 Oct 2009, 18:419746g10333
Re: SOA vs SMG or SOGRichard M Pisko30 Oct 2009, 17:506439g10332
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionJohn H30 Oct 2009, 17:416423g10331
Re: Dependence on GPSJohn H30 Oct 2009, 14:329512g10330
American navigation.George Huxtable30 Oct 2009, 13:417975g10329
Link A-12 Sextant RepairNavList Messages30 Oct 2009, 07:016932g10328
Re: sextant for use on landNavList Messages30 Oct 2009, 06:276448g10327
Re: Dependence on GPSPeter Fogg30 Oct 2009, 01:4615064g10326
Re: Dependence on GPSLu Abel30 Oct 2009, 01:3412184g10325
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionJohn H30 Oct 2009, 01:127580g10324
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionFrank Reed30 Oct 2009, 00:106465g10323
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionGeorge Huxtable29 Oct 2009, 23:437893g10322
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionFrank Reed29 Oct 2009, 23:217753g10321
SOA-SMG/When things go amissIrv Haworth29 Oct 2009, 22:5862998g10320
Re: Dependence on GPSPeter Fogg29 Oct 2009, 22:476635g10319
Re: Portuguese shipwreck questionPeter Fogg29 Oct 2009, 22:447668g10318
Re: Dependence on GPSFrank Reed29 Oct 2009, 22:187764g10317
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationFrank Reed29 Oct 2009, 22:036813g10316
Re: Dependence on GPSTom Sult29 Oct 2009, 22:017657g10315
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationKen Gebhart29 Oct 2009, 21:3312422g10314
Re: Dependence on GPSJohn H29 Oct 2009, 17:538656g10313
Re: Dependence on GPSLu Abel29 Oct 2009, 17:1312866g10312
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationRonald P Barrett29 Oct 2009, 16:5112043g10311
Re: SOA vs SMG or SOGByron Franklin29 Oct 2009, 16:077529g10310
Portuguese shipwreck questionJohn H29 Oct 2009, 14:3912299g10309
Re: Celestial Navigation on TVBrad Morris29 Oct 2009, 14:258834g10308
Landlubber Sunrise TableJoe Schultz29 Oct 2009, 11:25114418g10307
Re: Dependence on GPSPaul Jackson29 Oct 2009, 08:209210g10306
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationPaul Hirose29 Oct 2009, 04:317280g10305
Re: Celestial Navigation on TVFrank Reed29 Oct 2009, 03:298533g10304
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationFrank Reed29 Oct 2009, 03:097858g10303
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationKen Gebhart29 Oct 2009, 02:299957g10302
USS IntrepidByron Franklin28 Oct 2009, 23:13197643g10301
Re: SOA vs SMG or SOGByron Franklin28 Oct 2009, 19:469899g10300
Re: SOA vs SMG or SOGByron Franklin28 Oct 2009, 19:457195g10299
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationJackie Ferrari28 Oct 2009, 19:3610025g10298
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationJackie Ferrari28 Oct 2009, 19:3110762g10297
Re: Dependence on GPSJohn H28 Oct 2009, 17:578665g10296
Re: SOA vs SMG or SOGRichard M Pisko28 Oct 2009, 17:067620g10295
Re: Johnny Walker Commercial on TVGeorge Huxtable28 Oct 2009, 15:287930g10294
Johnny Walker Commercial on TVBrad Morris28 Oct 2009, 13:227268g10293
Re: Celestial Navigation on TVBrad Morris28 Oct 2009, 13:129858g10292
Re: SI UnitsBill B28 Oct 2009, 08:086834g10291
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationKen Gebhart28 Oct 2009, 03:326902g10290
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationFrank Reed28 Oct 2009, 01:458427g10289
Celestial Navigation on TVFrank Reed28 Oct 2009, 01:3141103g10288
Re: SOA vs SMG or SOGGreg Rudzinski27 Oct 2009, 22:499576g10287
Re: SOA vs SMG or SOGByron Franklin27 Oct 2009, 21:358749g10286
Re: Applications of Complex Analysis to CelestialNavigationRobin Stuart26 Oct 2009, 23:538023g10285
Re: Applications of Complex Analysis to CelestialNavigationRobin Stuart26 Oct 2009, 23:406985g10284
Re: SOA vs SMG or SOGIrv Haworth26 Oct 2009, 22:2120710g10283
Re: instances of the use of "horizon grazing" techniqueJohn H26 Oct 2009, 16:207111g10282
Re: instances of the use of "horizon grazing"techniqueBrad Morris26 Oct 2009, 14:207498g10281
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationJackie Ferrari26 Oct 2009, 07:1811383g10280
Re: Applications of Complex Analysis to CelestialNavigationAndrés Ruiz26 Oct 2009, 07:12817731g10279
Re: Applications of Complex Analysis to CelestialNavigationJohn Karl26 Oct 2009, 01:305228g10278
Re: SOA vs SMG or SOGJeremy C26 Oct 2009, 00:5216743g10277
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationFrank Reed26 Oct 2009, 00:4610140g10276
Re: Help - Unknown Compass Graduation ArrangementJoe Schultz25 Oct 2009, 23:205438g10275
Re: At the centre of timePeter Hakel25 Oct 2009, 15:1014406g10274
Re: Dependence on GPSAntoine Couëtte25 Oct 2009, 10:006561g10273
Re: Dependence on GPSPaul Jackson25 Oct 2009, 08:3012078g10272
Dependence on GPSJames N Wilson25 Oct 2009, 04:046259g10271
Re: At the centre of timeFrank Reed25 Oct 2009, 02:068056g10270
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationFrank Reed24 Oct 2009, 19:126755g10269
Re: At the centre of timeGary LaPook24 Oct 2009, 15:339369g10268
Re: At the centre of timeGary LaPook24 Oct 2009, 15:258845g10267
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationGary LaPook24 Oct 2009, 15:0714925g10266
Re: instances of the use of "horizon grazing" techniqueFrank Reed24 Oct 2009, 02:298249g10265
Re: SOA vs SMG or SOGGreg Rudzinski23 Oct 2009, 23:337789g10264
Re: SOA vs SMG or SOGIrv Haworth23 Oct 2009, 20:428283g10263
Re: shadow stick trivia questionByron Franklin23 Oct 2009, 19:385659g10262
Re: SOA vs SMG or SOGGreg Rudzinski23 Oct 2009, 18:586790g10261
Re: Help - Unknown Compass Graduation ArrangementRichard M Pisko23 Oct 2009, 18:437292g10260
Re: instances of the use of "horizon grazing" techniqueJohn H23 Oct 2009, 18:068135g10259
Re: instances of the use of "horizon grazing"techniqueBrad Morris23 Oct 2009, 17:5514414g10258
Re: instances of the use of "horizon grazing" techniqueJohn H23 Oct 2009, 17:379913g10257
Re: SOA vs SMG or SOGIrv Haworth23 Oct 2009, 17:297704g10256
Re: instances of the use of "horizon grazing" techniqueGeorge Huxtable23 Oct 2009, 16:329261g10255
Re: instances of the use of "horizon grazing" techniqueJohn H23 Oct 2009, 15:359765g10254
Re: instances of the use of "horizon grazing"techniqueByron Franklin23 Oct 2009, 15:008374g10253
Re: SI UnitsBrad Morris23 Oct 2009, 14:2517088g10252
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationJackie Ferrari23 Oct 2009, 11:4812193g10251
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyAndrés Ruiz23 Oct 2009, 10:4120671g10250
Re: SI UnitsDouglas Denny23 Oct 2009, 10:036285g10249
Applications of Complex Analysis to CelestialNavigationAndrés Ruiz23 Oct 2009, 09:41112948g10248
Re: Help - Unknown Compass Graduation ArrangementNicolàs de Hilster23 Oct 2009, 07:585976g10247
Re: Help - Unknown Compass Graduation ArrangementJoe Schultz23 Oct 2009, 07:366288g10246
Re: Help - Unknown Compass Graduation ArrangementNicolàs de Hilster23 Oct 2009, 06:316694g10245
Re: SOA vs SMG or SOGJoe Schultz23 Oct 2009, 06:226166g10244
Re: At the centre of timeGeoffrey Kolbe23 Oct 2009, 05:345750g10243
SI UnitsLu Abel23 Oct 2009, 05:186062g10242
Help - Unknown Compass Graduation ArrangementW F Jones23 Oct 2009, 05:045894g10241
Re: SI UnitsLu Abel23 Oct 2009, 04:458805g10240
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationGreg R_23 Oct 2009, 04:089546g10239
Re: SI UnitsPeter Fogg23 Oct 2009, 00:229656g10238
Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationGreg Rudzinski23 Oct 2009, 00:036403g10237
Amelia Earhart's aerial navigationFrank Reed22 Oct 2009, 23:387774g10236
Re: SI UnitsGreg Rudzinski22 Oct 2009, 23:345032g10235
Re: SI UnitsJames N Wilson22 Oct 2009, 23:057373g10234
Re: SI UnitsFrank Reed22 Oct 2009, 22:165766g10233
Re: SI UnitsMarcel Tschudin22 Oct 2009, 21:337132g10232
Re: At the centre of timePeter Hakel22 Oct 2009, 21:0617219g10231
Re: SI UnitsFrank Reed22 Oct 2009, 20:278429g10230
Re: At the centre of timeDouglas Denny22 Oct 2009, 18:2711540g10229
1932 Nautical C.Plath sextant for saleM Olsen21 Oct 2009, 16:255305g10228
Re: At the centre of timePeter Fogg22 Oct 2009, 15:1314578g10227
Re: SI UnitsMichael Dorl22 Oct 2009, 13:417630g10226
SI UnitsBrad Morris22 Oct 2009, 13:378935g10225
Re: At the centre of timeDouglas Denny22 Oct 2009, 09:286895g10224
Re: At the centre of timeGreg R_22 Oct 2009, 07:247541g10223
Re: At the centre of timePeter Fogg22 Oct 2009, 07:128009g10222
Re: At the centre of timeM v Noorden22 Oct 2009, 06:425027g10221
Re: At the centre of timeGeorge Huxtable22 Oct 2009, 06:295400g10220
Re: At the centre of timePeter Fogg22 Oct 2009, 02:527645g10219
Re: At the centre of timePaul Hirose21 Oct 2009, 22:018347g10218
Re: At the centre of timeDouglas Denny21 Oct 2009, 21:356722g10217
Re: At the centre of timeBrad Morris21 Oct 2009, 21:006958g10216
Re: At the centre of timeGeorge Huxtable21 Oct 2009, 20:556377g10215
Re: At the centre of timeDouglas Denny21 Oct 2009, 19:296728g10214
Navigation and love?Lu Abel21 Oct 2009, 18:535760g10213
Re: At the centre of timeTony21 Oct 2009, 17:215110g10212
Re: Radar Plotting Sheet for PolarisJohn Karl21 Oct 2009, 16:364664g10211
BBC E-mail: At the centre of timePeter Hollings21 Oct 2009, 15:367463g10210
Re: At the centre of timeBrad Morris21 Oct 2009, 15:279056g10209
Re: At the centre of timeDouglas Denny21 Oct 2009, 09:257546g10208
SOA vs SMG or SOGIrv Haworth21 Oct 2009, 01:2412416g10207
Re: At the centre of timeDouglas Denny20 Oct 2009, 23:598080g10206
Re: At the centre of timeDouglas Denny20 Oct 2009, 23:459881g10205
Re: At the centre of timeBrad Morris20 Oct 2009, 17:307818g10204
MisdirectedHanno Ix20 Oct 2009, 17:2012594g10203
Re: At the centre of timeHanno Ix20 Oct 2009, 17:0713641g10202
At the centre of timeRichard B. Langley20 Oct 2009, 15:297511g10201
Re: Transcribing old text, and long-essesBrad Morris19 Oct 2009, 17:3310098g10200
Re: Transcribing old text, and long-essesBrad Morris19 Oct 2009, 17:1940683g10199
Re: Transcribing old text, and long-essesLu Abel19 Oct 2009, 16:2933738g10198
Re: Transcribing old text, and long-essesGeorge Huxtable19 Oct 2009, 15:467537g10197
Re: Transcribing old text, and long-essesBrad Morris19 Oct 2009, 13:4127428g10196
Re: Cross Staffin use, 1574 imageNicolàs de Hilster19 Oct 2009, 10:437454g10195
Re: Cross Staffin use, 1574 imageGeorge Huxtable19 Oct 2009, 10:216900g10194
Re: Cross Staffin use, 1574 imageNicolàs de Hilster19 Oct 2009, 07:257500g10193
Re: Lookout by SoundJoe Schultz19 Oct 2009, 02:599063g10192
Re: Polar navigationGary LaPook19 Oct 2009, 00:537575g10191
Re: Radar Plotting Sheet for PolarisGary LaPook19 Oct 2009, 00:51737308g10190
Re: Polar navigationFrank Reed19 Oct 2009, 00:446708g10189
Re: Transcribing old text, and long-essesFrank Reed19 Oct 2009, 00:096670g10188
Radar Plotting Sheet for PolarisGreg Rudzinski18 Oct 2009, 23:45737835g10187
Re: Polar navigationGary LaPook18 Oct 2009, 23:307421g10186
Cross Staff in use, 1574 imageBrad Morris18 Oct 2009, 23:005532g10185
Re: Polar navigationBrad Morris18 Oct 2009, 22:547282g10184
Re: Cross Staff in use, 1574 imageBrad Morris18 Oct 2009, 22:386791g10183
Polar navigationPeter Hakel18 Oct 2009, 17:098260g10182
Re: Cross Staff in use, 1574 imageGeorge Huxtable18 Oct 2009, 16:0744441g10181
Re: Transcribing old text, and long-essesGeorge Huxtable18 Oct 2009, 13:216836g10180
Re: Transcribing old text, and long-essesNicolàs de Hilster18 Oct 2009, 11:1753991g10179
Transcribing old text, and long-essesGeorge Huxtable18 Oct 2009, 10:528340g10178
Re: Cross Staff in use, 1574imageGeorge Huxtable18 Oct 2009, 10:03478130g10177
Re: Cross Staff in use, 1574imageNicolàs de Hilster18 Oct 2009, 08:3112011g10176
Re: Cross Staff in use, 1574imageBrad Morris18 Oct 2009, 05:088247g10175
Re: modification of 2102-DFrank Reed18 Oct 2009, 02:141724390g10174
Re: modification of2102-D 9471Byron Franklin18 Oct 2009, 01:376331g10173
Re: Lookout by SoundByron Franklin18 Oct 2009, 01:327042g10172
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DByron Franklin18 Oct 2009, 00:545191g10171
Modification of2102-D 9471Byron Franklin18 Oct 2009, 00:405362g10170
Re: Lookout by SoundBruce Hamilton17 Oct 2009, 03:407610g10169
Re: Cross Staff in use, 1574 imageWolfgang Köberer16 Oct 2009, 21:116333g10168
Cross Staff in use, 1574 imageBrad Morris16 Oct 2009, 20:137126g10167
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyAntoine Couëtte16 Oct 2009, 19:268724g10166
Re: Lookout by SoundBrad Morris16 Oct 2009, 17:178171g10165
Re: Lookout by SoundGreg Rudzinski16 Oct 2009, 16:177307g10164
Re: shadow stick trivia questionJohn H16 Oct 2009, 11:158078g10163
Lookout by SoundJeremy C16 Oct 2009, 10:4110111g10162
Re: Navigator's Vision,Day or Night.Frank Reed16 Oct 2009, 05:40115149g10161
Re: Navigator's Vision,Day or Night.Peter Hakel16 Oct 2009, 02:019856g10160
Re: shadow stick trivia questionFrank Reed16 Oct 2009, 01:346648g10159
Re: shadow stick trivia questionJohn H16 Oct 2009, 00:569419g10158
Re: shadow stick trivia questionFrank Reed16 Oct 2009, 00:387688g10157
Shadow stick trivia questionJohn H15 Oct 2009, 23:3510584g10156
Re: Regiment of the SeaPeter Fogg15 Oct 2009, 22:0515233g10155
Re: Regiment of the SeaKent Nordström15 Oct 2009, 19:3915068g10154
Re: Navigator's Vision,Day or Night.Byron Franklin15 Oct 2009, 18:325732g10153
Re: William Bourne. A Regiment for the Sea. 1574Brad Morris15 Oct 2009, 13:006839g10152
Re: Regiment of the SeaBrad Morris15 Oct 2009, 12:3272323g10151
Re: Navigator's Vision,Day or Night.Dave Walden15 Oct 2009, 12:315323g10150
Re: William Bourne. A Regiment for the Sea. 1574George Huxtable15 Oct 2009, 12:01260308g10149
Re: Regiment of the SeaPeter Fogg15 Oct 2009, 09:4567896g10148
Regiment of the Sea - my requestKent Nordström15 Oct 2009, 09:187139g10147
Regiment of the SeaKent Nordström15 Oct 2009, 08:357681g10146
Astronavigation and the 21st centuryAndrés Ruiz15 Oct 2009, 07:575837g10145
Re: Navigator's Vision,Day or Night.Andrés Ruiz15 Oct 2009, 07:189978g10144
Re: Navigator's Vision,Day or Night.Joe Schultz15 Oct 2009, 04:217716g10143
Re: Navigation Weekend: Spring 2010Frank Reed14 Oct 2009, 23:186333g10142
Re: Fix by equal altitude sights around localapparent noonPaul Hirose14 Oct 2009, 22:546621g10141
Re: Navigation Weekend: Spring 2010Ken Gebhart14 Oct 2009, 21:497752g10140
Re: Navigation Weekend: Spring 2010Frank Reed14 Oct 2009, 21:096377g10139
Re: Navigation Weekend: Spring 2010Geoffrey Kolbe14 Oct 2009, 20:535798g10138
Re: Fix by equal altitude sights around localapparent noonGeoffrey Kolbe14 Oct 2009, 20:358018g10137
Navigation Weekend: Spring 2010Frank Reed14 Oct 2009, 20:288049g10136
Re: William Bourne. A Regiment for the Sea. 1574Dave Walden14 Oct 2009, 17:506506g10135
Re: William Bourne. A Regiment for the Sea. 1574Nicolàs de Hilster14 Oct 2009, 15:277100g10134
William Bourne. A Regiment for the Sea. 1574Brad Morris14 Oct 2009, 15:0636914g10133
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyAndrés Ruiz14 Oct 2009, 13:166846g10132
Re: Fix by equal altitude sights around localapparent noonGeorge Huxtable14 Oct 2009, 07:366988g10131
Re: Fix by equal altitude sights around localapparent noonGeoffrey Kolbe14 Oct 2009, 06:108966g10130
Re: Fix by equal altitude sights around localapparent noonGeorge Huxtable13 Oct 2009, 21:348764g10129
Re: Conference announcement and call for papersGeoffrey Kolbe13 Oct 2009, 21:017285g10128
Re: Fix by equal altitude sights around localapparent noonGeoffrey Kolbe13 Oct 2009, 20:358057g10127
Re: Conference announcement and call for papersKen Gebhart13 Oct 2009, 20:268776g10126
Re: Conference announcement and call for papersGeorge Huxtable13 Oct 2009, 19:388595g10125
Re: Fix by equal altitude sights around localapparent noonGreg R_13 Oct 2009, 19:378194g10124
Re: Fix by equal altitude sights around localapparent noonPeter Fogg13 Oct 2009, 18:538200g10123
Re: Fix by equal altitude sights around localapparent noonGeorge Huxtable13 Oct 2009, 18:3114757g10122
Re: Land or seaWolfgang Hasper13 Oct 2009, 17:085577g10121
Re: Land or seaPaul Hirose13 Oct 2009, 16:076444g10120
Re: Fix by equal altitude sights around localapparent noonJames N Wilson12 Oct 2009, 18:217262g10119
Re: Pedigree of C Plath SextantNavList Messages12 Oct 2009, 18:527133g10118
Re: Navigator's Vision,Day or Night.Byron Franklin12 Oct 2009, 15:0112471g10117
Re: Land or seaNicolàs de Hilster12 Oct 2009, 13:0421724g10116
Re: Land or seaNicolàs de Hilster12 Oct 2009, 12:2531864g10115
Land or seaWolfgang Hasper12 Oct 2009, 11:536527g10114
Re: Navigation journals on CD?George Huxtable12 Oct 2009, 10:5710595g10113
Re: Navigation journals on CD?Frank Reed12 Oct 2009, 01:077738g10112
Re: Navigator's Vision,Day or Night.Greg Rudzinski11 Oct 2009, 19:5511936g10111
Re: Navigator's Vision,Day or Night.Byron Franklin11 Oct 2009, 15:4511464g10110
Re: Fix by equal altitude sights around localapparent noonJohn H11 Oct 2009, 11:488342g10109
Re: Navigation gathering: Mystic, Spring 2010Ken Gebhart11 Oct 2009, 02:216626g10108
Deal on astraIIIDave Walden11 Oct 2009, 01:485082g10107
Re: Fix by equal altitude sights around localapparent noonJames N Wilson10 Oct 2009, 22:597408g10106
Re: Fix by equal altitude sights around localapparent noonHewitt Schlereth10 Oct 2009, 22:5614131g10105
Re: Fix by equal altitude sights around localapparent noonFrank Reed10 Oct 2009, 21:3813210g10104
Re: Fix by equal altitude sights around localapparent noonNavList Messages10 Oct 2009, 06:546697g10103
Re: Additional error found in H.O. 249Paul Hirose9 Oct 2009, 20:477424g10102
Announcement Of Dut1Andrés Ruiz9 Oct 2009, 12:156771g10101
Re: Additional error found in H.O. 249Gary LaPook8 Oct 2009, 08:176878g10100
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyAndrés Ruiz8 Oct 2009, 06:16214332g10099
Re: Additional error found in H.O. 249Gary LaPook8 Oct 2009, 02:049459g10098
Re: Additional error found in H.O. 249Douglas Denny7 Oct 2009, 21:138252g10097
Re: Additional error found in H.O. 249Brad Morris7 Oct 2009, 20:258296g10096
Re: Additional error found in H.O. 249Gary LaPook7 Oct 2009, 19:587163g10095
Re: Navigation journals on CD?Byron Franklin7 Oct 2009, 17:177270g10094
Re: Noon sun fix exampleHewitt Schlereth7 Oct 2009, 14:3614574g10093
Re: Navigator's Vision,Day or Night.Jeremy C7 Oct 2009, 14:2613306g10092
Re: Flight navigation websiteGary LaPook7 Oct 2009, 09:145798g10091
Additional error found in H.O. 249Gary LaPook7 Oct 2009, 08:324773g10090
Conference announcement and call for papersRichard Dunn7 Oct 2009, 07:578319g10089
Re: Instrument for HA, Lat ... of points on the Sumner line may be directly obs at seaDouglas Simpson7 Oct 2009, 05:128276g10088
Re: instances of the use of "horizon grazing" techniquePeter Fogg7 Oct 2009, 00:1315568g10087
Re: instances of the use of "horizon grazing" techniquePeter Fogg7 Oct 2009, 00:0812095g10086
Re: instances of the use of "horizon grazing"techniqueLu Abel6 Oct 2009, 23:545474g10085
Re: instances of the use of "horizon grazing"techniqueGreg Rudzinski6 Oct 2009, 23:015211g10084
Re: norie's nautical tables avail for downloadNavList Messages6 Oct 2009, 11:375590g10083
Artificial Horizon Type C.Paul Jackson6 Oct 2009, 12:387916g10082
Re: Navigation journals on CD?George Huxtable6 Oct 2009, 19:107902g10081
Instances of the use of "horizon grazing" techniqueJohn H6 Oct 2009, 17:366629g10080
Navigation journals on CD?Frank Reed6 Oct 2009, 16:415362g10079
Re: Instrument for HA, Lat ... of points on the Sumner line may be directly obs at seaDave Walden6 Oct 2009, 15:236675g10078
Re: Instrument for HA, Lat ... ofpoints on the Sumner line may be directly obs at seaWolfgang Köberer6 Oct 2009, 15:2115961g10077
Re: Instrument for HA, Lat ... of points on the Sumner line may be directly obs at seaDouglas Simpson6 Oct 2009, 14:0710023g10076
Instrument for HA, Lat ... of points on the Sumnerline may be directly obs at seaDave Walden6 Oct 2009, 12:145227g10075
Re: Navigator's Vision,Day or Night.Tom Sult6 Oct 2009, 00:549018g10074
Re: Navigator's Vision,Day or Night.Peter Fogg5 Oct 2009, 22:337700g10073
Re: Navigator's Vision,Day or Night.Douglas Denny5 Oct 2009, 22:277445g10072
Re: Navigator's Vision,Day or Night.Greg Rudzinski5 Oct 2009, 21:537540g10071
Re: Navigator's Vision,Day or Night.Byron Franklin5 Oct 2009, 21:307268g10070
Re: Noon sun fix exampleJeremy C5 Oct 2009, 19:3124626g10069
Re: Navigator's Vision,Day or Night.Greg Rudzinski5 Oct 2009, 18:397224g10068
Navigator's Vision,Day or Night.Byron Franklin5 Oct 2009, 16:348754g10067
Re: Flight navigation websiteAndrés Ruiz5 Oct 2009, 12:005944g10066
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyAndrés Ruiz5 Oct 2009, 10:32276031g10065
Re: GPS direction: Rumb line or great circleVic Fraenckel5 Oct 2009, 09:585056g10064
Re: GPS direction: Rumb line or great circleM v Noorden5 Oct 2009, 07:475272g10063
Re: Astrolabes. was facing MeccaGary LaPook4 Oct 2009, 23:0110096g10062
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyAntoine Couëtte3 Oct 2009, 19:2210193g10061
Re: Astrolabes. was facing MeccaWolfgang Köberer3 Oct 2009, 18:337119g10060
Re: Astrolabes. was facing MeccaMarcel Tschudin3 Oct 2009, 17:397013g10059
Re: Astrolabes. was facing MeccaNicolàs de Hilster3 Oct 2009, 16:257821g10058
Astrolabes. was facing MeccaGeorge Huxtable3 Oct 2009, 16:007383g10057
Re: facing MeccaJohn H3 Oct 2009, 15:186684g10056
Re: GPS direction: Rumb line or great circleDouglas Denny3 Oct 2009, 11:425842g10055
Re: Flight navigation websiteAntoine Couëtte3 Oct 2009, 08:176853g10054
Re: Mercator vs. Great Circle Charts and BowditchNavList Messages1 Oct 2009, 20:506567g10053
GPS direction: Rumb line or great circleM v Noorden1 Oct 2009, 06:404510g10052
Re: facing MeccaFrank Reed3 Oct 2009, 03:078164g10051
Re: Flight navigation websiteDouglas Simpson3 Oct 2009, 00:218517g10050
Flight navigation websiteGary LaPook2 Oct 2009, 21:057050g10049
Re: Allowing for current. was: Re:Noon sun fix exampleGary LaPook2 Oct 2009, 20:427066g10048
Re: Allowing for current. was: Re:Noon sun fix exampleGary LaPook2 Oct 2009, 20:3210563g10047
Re: Allowing for currentPaul Hirose2 Oct 2009, 20:177283g10046
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyGary LaPook2 Oct 2009, 20:0910327g10045
Re: Bygrave and MHR-1 locking mechanism constructionBrad Morris2 Oct 2009, 14:0914296g10044
Re: Bygrave and MHR-1 locking mechanism constructionGary LaPook2 Oct 2009, 10:2523937g10043
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyAntoine Couëtte2 Oct 2009, 09:366533g10042
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyGary LaPook2 Oct 2009, 09:0038855g10041
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyAntoine Couëtte2 Oct 2009, 07:0314603g10040
Re: [9686] compass pointsArk Shvetsky2 Oct 2009, 04:576752g10039
Re: facing MeccaPeter Fogg2 Oct 2009, 04:158425g10038
Re: Allowing for currentPeter Fogg2 Oct 2009, 03:0113670g10037
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyPeter Hakel2 Oct 2009, 02:2636309g10036
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyGary LaPook2 Oct 2009, 01:1533949g10035
Re: Charles Cotter_The Ex-Meridian ProblemDouglas Denny2 Oct 2009, 00:286827g10034
Re: Allowing for currentGeorge Huxtable2 Oct 2009, 00:1410472g10033
Charles Cotter_The Ex-Meridian ProblemDouglas Denny2 Oct 2009, 00:126577g10032
Re: , , Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyFrank Reed1 Oct 2009, 23:207097g10031
Re: , , Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyJames N Wilson1 Oct 2009, 22:027023g10030
Re: Bygrave and MHR-1 locking mechanism constructionGary LaPook1 Oct 2009, 22:437400g10029
Re: , , Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyAntoine Couëtte1 Oct 2009, 20:2412565g10028
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyPeter Hakel1 Oct 2009, 19:3428575g10027
Re: Allowing for currentDouglas Denny1 Oct 2009, 19:0614034g10026
Re: Bygrave and MHR-1 locking mechanism constructionBrad Morris1 Oct 2009, 18:496876g10025
Re: Bygrave and MHR-1 locking mechanism constructionWolfgang Hasper1 Oct 2009, 18:1912439g10024
Re: Azimuthal equidistant gridGary LaPook1 Oct 2009, 17:437508g10023
Re: Allowing for currentGeorge Huxtable1 Oct 2009, 15:2611982g10022
Re: two-body computed fix. was: assumed positionsPeter Hakel1 Oct 2009, 14:369887g10021
Re: Allowing for current. was: Re:Noon sun fix exampleGeorge Huxtable1 Oct 2009, 09:419707g10020
Re: two-body computed fix. was: assumed positionsRobin Stuart1 Oct 2009, 12:476659g10019
Re: two-body computed fix. was: assumed positionsAndrés Ruiz1 Oct 2009, 12:226784g10018
Re: two-body computed fix. was: assumed positionsAntoine Couëtte1 Oct 2009, 11:295855g10017
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyDouglas Denny1 Oct 2009, 11:047564g10016
Re: two-body computed fix. was: assumed positionsRobin Stuart1 Oct 2009, 11:00264935g10015
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyAndrés Ruiz1 Oct 2009, 09:53119923g10014
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyGary LaPook1 Oct 2009, 06:455748g10013
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyPeter Hakel1 Oct 2009, 06:1916461g10012
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyAntoine Couëtte1 Oct 2009, 06:107702g10011
Re: facing MeccaAntoine Couëtte1 Oct 2009, 04:366893g10010
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyGary LaPook1 Oct 2009, 04:1914675g10009
Re: facing MeccaBruce Hamilton1 Oct 2009, 02:205067g10008
Re: Noon sun fix exampleHewitt Schlereth1 Oct 2009, 02:1511831g10007
Re: Allowing for current. was: Re: Noon sun fix examplePeter Fogg1 Oct 2009, 00:258817g10006
Re: Allowing for current. was: Re:Noon sun fix exampleDouglas Denny30 Sep 2009, 23:548909g10005
Re: facing MeccaJohn H30 Sep 2009, 23:349690g10004
Re: facing MeccaGreg Rudzinski30 Sep 2009, 23:264984g10003
Re: facing MeccaLu Abel30 Sep 2009, 23:255114g10002
Re: facing MeccaJohn H30 Sep 2009, 22:296914g10001
Allowing for current. was: Re: Noonsun fix exampleGeorge Huxtable30 Sep 2009, 21:397656g10000
Re: facing MeccaDoug30 Sep 2009, 21:2410128g9999
Re: facing MeccaGeorge Huxtable30 Sep 2009, 21:006541g9998
Re: Noon sun fix exampleJeremy C30 Sep 2009, 20:3318367g9997
Re: facing Mecca There is/was a Mecca Indicator in theHZ planesRonald P Barrett30 Sep 2009, 20:279912g9996
Re: facing MeccaBrad Morris30 Sep 2009, 18:5116021g9995
Facing MeccaJohn H30 Sep 2009, 18:376971g9994
Bygrave and MHR-1 locking mechanism constructionGary LaPook30 Sep 2009, 01:559758g9993
Azimuthal equidistant gridAndrew Nikitin30 Sep 2009, 01:23171135g9992
Re: Kollsman sextantDouglas Simpson30 Sep 2009, 00:0514480g9991
Re: Kollsman sextantWerner Luehmann29 Sep 2009, 16:558970g9990
Re: Kollsman sextantDouglas Simpson29 Sep 2009, 14:2912733g9989
Re: Kollsman sextantDouglas Simpson29 Sep 2009, 14:2710312g9988
Re: Kollsman sextantDouglas Simpson29 Sep 2009, 14:269176g9987
Re: Kollsman sextantRonald P Barrett29 Sep 2009, 13:2111781g9986
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracy, Smart, andCotter.Andrés Ruiz29 Sep 2009, 12:417425g9985
Re: Kollsman sextantGary LaPook29 Sep 2009, 11:315360g9984
Re: Kollsman sextantGary LaPook29 Sep 2009, 11:165235g9983
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracy, Smart, andCotter.George Huxtable29 Sep 2009, 10:378465g9982
Re: time of meridian passage accuracyAndrés Ruiz29 Sep 2009, 07:41121555g9981
Bubble circle sextant by G.Felsenthal and SonsDouglas Simpson29 Sep 2009, 07:136365g9980
Kollsman sextantDouglas Simpson29 Sep 2009, 07:106765g9979
VERY short tabular methodDave Walden29 Sep 2009, 02:015589g9978
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracy, Smart, andCotter.Douglas Denny29 Sep 2009, 00:0315943g9977
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyDouglas Denny28 Sep 2009, 22:369704g9976
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyJames N Wilson28 Sep 2009, 17:587064g9975
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyGary LaPook28 Sep 2009, 17:188706g9974
Re: 9471Byron Franklin28 Sep 2009, 16:2383433g9973
Vertical SextantByron Franklin28 Sep 2009, 16:1783265g9972
Re: Artificial horizon glass selectionNicolàs de Hilster28 Sep 2009, 14:095169g9971
Re: two-body computed fix. was: assumed positionsAndrés Ruiz28 Sep 2009, 12:127012g9970
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyGeorge Huxtable28 Sep 2009, 10:467398g9969
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyGary LaPook28 Sep 2009, 10:0820820g9968
Re: Artificial horizon glass selectionWolfgang Hasper28 Sep 2009, 09:597586g9967
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracy, Smart, andCotter.George Huxtable28 Sep 2009, 08:5464075g9966
Re: New Member IntroductionJoe Schultz28 Sep 2009, 05:237661g9965
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyJoe Schultz28 Sep 2009, 04:257122g9964
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyDouglas Denny27 Sep 2009, 23:4619171g9963
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyDouglas Denny27 Sep 2009, 22:307365g9962
Re: [9955]time of meridian passage accuracyPeter Hakel27 Sep 2009, 18:2410925g9961
Re: [9955]time of meridian passage accuracyGeorge Huxtable27 Sep 2009, 14:417902g9960
Re: [9955]time of meridian passage accuracyAntoine Couëtte27 Sep 2009, 12:3711539g9959
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyGeorge Huxtable27 Sep 2009, 09:369522g9958
Re: [9955]time of meridian passage accuracyGeorge Huxtable27 Sep 2009, 06:326338g9957
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyAntoine Couëtte27 Sep 2009, 01:177644g9956
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyJames N Wilson26 Sep 2009, 23:588482g9955
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyJames N Wilson27 Sep 2009, 00:047881g9954
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyPeter Fogg26 Sep 2009, 23:587099g9953
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyJohn H26 Sep 2009, 23:028591g9952
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyGeorge Huxtable26 Sep 2009, 22:417895g9951
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyDouglas Denny26 Sep 2009, 18:399541g9950
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyJeremy C26 Sep 2009, 16:4512799g9949
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyGeorge Huxtable26 Sep 2009, 16:2710882g9948
Re: DouwesPeter Hakel26 Sep 2009, 15:4614139g9947
Re: Celesticomp VPaul Jackson26 Sep 2009, 11:528081g9946
Re: DouwesWolfgang Köberer26 Sep 2009, 12:487946g9945
Re: How Many Chronometers?Douglas Denny26 Sep 2009, 10:517812g9944
Re: DouwesNicolàs de Hilster26 Sep 2009, 10:139786g9943
Re: How Many Chronometers?Gary LaPook26 Sep 2009, 09:4313552g9942
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyAntoine Couëtte26 Sep 2009, 07:148061g9941
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyDouglas Denny26 Sep 2009, 06:565553g9940
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyDouglas Denny26 Sep 2009, 06:516933g9939
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyAntoine Couëtte26 Sep 2009, 06:436852g9938
Re: two-body computed fix. was: assumed positionsPeter Hakel26 Sep 2009, 02:1611870g9937
Re: two-body computed fix. was: assumed positionsJohn Karl26 Sep 2009, 02:014793g9936
Celesticomp VNavList Messages25 Sep 2009, 22:226450g9935
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyGeorge Huxtable25 Sep 2009, 23:447836g9934
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyDouglas Denny25 Sep 2009, 22:487558g9933
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyDouglas Denny25 Sep 2009, 22:2910326g9932
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyJames N Wilson25 Sep 2009, 21:227123g9931
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyPeter Hakel25 Sep 2009, 22:199818g9930
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyGeorge Huxtable25 Sep 2009, 20:466897g9929
Re: two-body computed fix. was: assumed positionsLu Abel25 Sep 2009, 20:256982g9928
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyGeorge Huxtable25 Sep 2009, 20:236978g9927
Re: two-body computed fix. was: assumed positionsGeorge Huxtable25 Sep 2009, 19:415943g9926
Re: In Honor Of Jeremy Two Stars Full Lan's : Oneupper And One Lower CulminationAntoine Couëtte25 Sep 2009, 19:506979g9925
Two-body computed fix. was: assumed positionsGeorge Huxtable25 Sep 2009, 19:295495g9924
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracyDouglas Denny25 Sep 2009, 18:269520g9923
Artificial horizon glass selectionBruce Hamilton25 Sep 2009, 17:296980g9922
Re: Assumed positions, WAS: IN HONOR OF JEREMY...Lu Abel25 Sep 2009, 17:085812g9921
Re: Assumed positions, WAS: IN HONOR OF JEREMY...George Huxtable25 Sep 2009, 16:555581g9920
Re: Assumed positions, WAS: IN HONOR OF JEREMY...George Huxtable25 Sep 2009, 16:418102g9919
DouwesAndrés Ruiz25 Sep 2009, 12:48632569g9918
Re: Assumed positions, WAS: IN HONOR OF JEREMY...Peter Hakel25 Sep 2009, 12:2413491g9917
Re: Assumed positions, WAS: IN HONOR OF JEREMY...Antoine Couëtte25 Sep 2009, 11:1011714g9916
Re: Sextant TermsNicolàs de Hilster25 Sep 2009, 08:5865781g9915
Time of meridian passage accuracyAndrés Ruiz25 Sep 2009, 07:2511276g9914
Re: In Honor Of Jeremy Two Stars Full Lan's : Oneupper And One Lower CulminationAndrés Ruiz25 Sep 2009, 06:5210072g9913
Re: New Member IntroductionAntoine Couëtte25 Sep 2009, 06:057746g9912
Re: Sextant TermsGeoffrey Kolbe25 Sep 2009, 05:537395g9911
New Member IntroductionJoe Schultz25 Sep 2009, 03:087503g9910
Re: Sextant & PaintingJohn Karl25 Sep 2009, 02:124407g9909
Re: In Honor Of Jeremy Two Stars Full Lan's : Oneupper And One Lower CulminationAntoine Couëtte24 Sep 2009, 23:136967g9908
Re: Sextant TermsGeorge Huxtable24 Sep 2009, 22:14139233g9907
Re: checking the magnetic compassByron Franklin24 Sep 2009, 21:568580g9906
Re: Sextant TermsNicolàs de Hilster24 Sep 2009, 20:417642g9905
Re: MHR1 dimensions and detailsGary LaPook24 Sep 2009, 20:228370g9904
MHR1 dimensions and detailsWolfgang Hasper24 Sep 2009, 19:599676g9903
Re: Noon sun fix exampleHewitt Schlereth24 Sep 2009, 16:1114265g9902
Re: How Many Chronometers?Douglas Denny24 Sep 2009, 15:589640g9901
Re: How Many Chronometers?John H24 Sep 2009, 14:5112668g9900
Re: checking the magnetic compassAntoine Couëtte24 Sep 2009, 14:457388g9899
Re: Standing over Giants' shoulders (Was ExerciseLunar Distance with Mercury)Peter Hakel24 Sep 2009, 14:289252g9898
Re: In Honor Of Jeremy Two Stars Full Lan's : Oneupper And One Lower CulminationAndrés Ruiz24 Sep 2009, 14:26196982g9897
Re: How Many Chronometers?Douglas Denny24 Sep 2009, 12:4910479g9896
Re: Standing over Giants' shoulders (Was ExerciseLunar Distance with Mercury)Antoine Couëtte24 Sep 2009, 10:1811864g9895
Re: How Many Chronometers?Gary LaPook24 Sep 2009, 07:1227565g9894
Sextant & PaintingAndrés Ruiz24 Sep 2009, 06:32170711g9893
Re: checking the magnetic compassBruce Hamilton24 Sep 2009, 02:366679g9892
Re: Exercise Lunar Distance with MercuryJeremy C24 Sep 2009, 00:5314988g9891
Re: Star Fix statisticsJeremy C24 Sep 2009, 00:4912396g9890
Checking the magnetic compassJeremy C24 Sep 2009, 00:3910698g9889
Re: Exercise Lunar Distance with MercuryBrad Morris23 Sep 2009, 23:119584g9888
Re: Star Fix statisticsGreg Rudzinski23 Sep 2009, 23:075453g9887
Re: Exercise Lunar Distance with MercuryJeremy C23 Sep 2009, 22:567764g9886
Re: Exercise Lunar Distance with MercuryJeremy C23 Sep 2009, 22:5236083g9885
Re: Noon sun fix exampleJeremy C23 Sep 2009, 22:4012551g9884
Re: How Many Chronometers?Jeremy C23 Sep 2009, 22:4015803g9883
Star Fix statisticsJeremy C23 Sep 2009, 22:408061g9882
Re: Exercise Lunar Distance with MercuryGeorge Huxtable23 Sep 2009, 19:119284g9881
Re: Exercise Lunar Distance with MercuryGeorge Huxtable23 Sep 2009, 17:309557g9880
Assumed positions, WAS: IN HONOR OF JEREMY...Peter Hakel23 Sep 2009, 16:1812870g9879
Re: Rising sea? Sinking land? Whichever, pacificatolls are disappearingKen Muldrew23 Sep 2009, 15:578106g9878
Re: In Honor Of Jeremy Two Stars Full Lan's : Oneupper And One Lower CulminationAndrés Ruiz23 Sep 2009, 14:47420974g9877
Re: Exercise Lunar Distance with MercuryAntoine Couëtte23 Sep 2009, 10:079092g9876
Re: Flight 19 routeGary LaPook23 Sep 2009, 09:059803g9875
Re: Rising sea? Sinking land? Whichever, pacific atolls are disappearingPeter Fogg23 Sep 2009, 08:349565g9874
Re: Rising sea? Sinking land? Whichever, pacificatolls are disappearingFrank Reed23 Sep 2009, 08:227082g9873
Re: How Many Chronometers?Frank Reed23 Sep 2009, 08:065762g9872
Re: Exercise Lunar Distance with MercuryFrank Reed23 Sep 2009, 07:597339g9871
Re: In Honor Of Jeremy Two Stars Full Lan's : Oneupper And One Lower CulminationAntoine Couëtte23 Sep 2009, 07:535498g9870
Use of a stopwatch to time celestial sightsGary LaPook23 Sep 2009, 06:11382641g9869
Re: Exercise Lunar Distance with MercuryBrad Morris23 Sep 2009, 03:4917803g9868
Re: Use of a stopwatch to time celestial sightsBrad Morris23 Sep 2009, 03:3110127g9867
Re: In Honor Of Jeremy Two Stars Full Lan's : Oneupper And One Lower CulminationPeter Hakel23 Sep 2009, 01:0013867g9866
Re: Use of a stopwatch to time celestial sightsGreg Rudzinski22 Sep 2009, 23:097488g9865
Rising sea? Sinking land? Whichever, pacific atollsare disappearingPeter Fogg22 Sep 2009, 23:067014g9864
Re: How Many Chronometers?Lu Abel22 Sep 2009, 19:467209g9863
Re: Noon sun fix exampleHewitt Schlereth22 Sep 2009, 16:3825659g9862
Re: In Honor Of Jeremy Two Stars Full Lan's : Oneupper And One Lower CulminationAntoine Couëtte22 Sep 2009, 16:107338g9861
Re: In Honor Of Jeremy Two Stars Full Lan's : Oneupper And One Lower CulminationAntoine Couëtte22 Sep 2009, 15:585633g9860
Re: In Honor Of Jeremy Two Stars Full Lan's : Oneupper And One Lower CulminationAntoine Couëtte22 Sep 2009, 15:585630g9859
Re: How Many Chronometers?Byron Franklin22 Sep 2009, 15:255882g9858
Re: In Honor Of Jeremy Two Stars Full Lan's : Oneupper And One Lower CulminationAndrés Ruiz22 Sep 2009, 14:475849g9857
Re: In Honor Of Jeremy Two Stars Full Lan's : Oneupper And One Lower CulminationPeter Hakel22 Sep 2009, 14:1411203g9856
Re: Flight 19 routeGary LaPook22 Sep 2009, 13:1197105g9855
Flight 19 RouteGary LaPook22 Sep 2009, 13:0510920g9854
Re: Flight 19 routeGary LaPook22 Sep 2009, 13:0387779g9853
Re: In Honor Of Jeremy Two Stars Full Lan's : Oneupper And One Lower CulminationAntoine Couëtte22 Sep 2009, 12:556961g9852
Re: In Honor Of Jeremy Two Stars Full Lan's : Oneupper And One Lower CulminationAntoine Couëtte22 Sep 2009, 12:366672g9851
Re: In Honor Of Jeremy Two Stars Full Lan's : Oneupper And One Lower CulminationAntoine Couëtte22 Sep 2009, 12:258305g9850
Use of a stopwatch to time celestial sightsGary LaPook22 Sep 2009, 10:489203g9849
Re: Longitude by altitudes. was Re: How Many Chronometers?Gary LaPook22 Sep 2009, 10:4111337g9848
Re: How Many Chronometers?Gary LaPook22 Sep 2009, 09:3911841g9847
Re: How Many Chronometers?George Huxtable22 Sep 2009, 08:559503g9846
Re: How Many Chronometers?NavList Messages22 Sep 2009, 05:468476g9845
Re: In Honor Of Jeremy Two Stars Full Lan's : Oneupper And One Lower CulminationPeter Hakel22 Sep 2009, 00:4610914g9844
Re: How Many Chronometers?Gary LaPook21 Sep 2009, 19:4825749g9843
Re: How Many Chronometers?John H21 Sep 2009, 19:537924g9842
Re: How Many Chronometers?Greg Rudzinski21 Sep 2009, 19:4512577g9841
Re: In Honor Of Jeremy Two Stars Full Lan's : Oneupper And One Lower CulminationGeorge Huxtable21 Sep 2009, 17:307251g9840
Re: How Many Chronometers?Wolfgang Hasper21 Sep 2009, 17:1112411g9839
Re: In Honor Of Jeremy Two Stars Full Lan's : Oneupper And One Lower CulminationPeter Hakel21 Sep 2009, 16:1520944g9838
Re: In Honor Of Jeremy Two Stars Full Lan's : Oneupper And One Lower CulminationAntoine Couëtte21 Sep 2009, 10:376733g9837
Re: In Honor Of Jeremy Two Stars Full Lan's : Oneupper And On...Jeremy C21 Sep 2009, 09:5917481g9836
Re: Noon sun fix exampleJeremy C21 Sep 2009, 09:498346g9835
Re: In Honor Of Jeremy Two Stars Full Lan's : Oneupper And One Lower CulminationAntoine Couëtte21 Sep 2009, 09:346755g9834
Re: In Honor Of Jeremy Two Stars Full Lan's : Oneupper And One Lower CulminationAntoine Couëtte21 Sep 2009, 06:2710400g9833
Re: In Honor Of Jeremy Two Stars Full Lan's : Oneupper And One Lower CulminationPeter Hakel21 Sep 2009, 03:2811677g9832
News items about navigationFrank Reed21 Sep 2009, 03:028289g9831
Article on Joshua SlocumFrank Reed21 Sep 2009, 02:205913g9830
Re: How Many Chronometers?John H20 Sep 2009, 21:596801g9829
Re: How Many Chronometers?Michael Dorl20 Sep 2009, 21:438020g9828
Re: In Honor Of Jeremy Two Stars Full Lan's : Oneupper And One Lower CulminationPeter Hakel20 Sep 2009, 21:2911658g9827
Re: Alhena Lunar exerciseAntoine Couëtte20 Sep 2009, 20:507937g9826
Re: How Many Chronometers?Gary LaPook20 Sep 2009, 20:1790853g9825
Re: How Many Chronometers?Gary LaPook20 Sep 2009, 19:5589873g9824
In Honor Of Jeremy Two Stars Full Lan's : One Upperand One Lower CulminationAntoine Couëtte20 Sep 2009, 19:3010592g9823
Re: How Many Chronometers?Gary LaPook20 Sep 2009, 19:218731g9822
Re: How Many Chronometers?Gary LaPook20 Sep 2009, 19:118332g9821
Alhena Lunar exerciseJeremy C20 Sep 2009, 19:108437g9820
Re: [9686] compass pointsJeremy C20 Sep 2009, 18:268575g9819
Re: Flight 19 routePaul Hirose20 Sep 2009, 18:147644g9818
Re: Exercise: Lower TransitAntoine Couëtte20 Sep 2009, 18:087592g9817
Re: Exercise Lunar Distance with MercuryAntoine Couëtte20 Sep 2009, 16:4816515g9816
Re: How Many Chronometers?Philip Lange20 Sep 2009, 13:387000g9815
Re: Mapping softwareVic Fraenckel20 Sep 2009, 10:114675g9814
Re: How Many Chronometers?Bruce Hamilton20 Sep 2009, 09:366246g9813
Re: How Many Chronometers?Gary LaPook20 Sep 2009, 08:40103899g9812
Re: Exercise Lunar Distance with MercuryPeter Hakel19 Sep 2009, 23:3413894g9811
Re: Exercise: Lower TransitJeremy C19 Sep 2009, 23:1814685g9810
Re: Exercise: Lower TransitPeter Hakel19 Sep 2009, 22:569932g9809
Re: typical standard deviation?George Huxtable19 Sep 2009, 22:2810830g9808
Exercise Lunar Distance with MercuryJeremy C19 Sep 2009, 22:088408g9807
Exercise: Lower TransitJeremy C19 Sep 2009, 22:087895g9806
Re: How Many Chronometers?Byron Franklin19 Sep 2009, 22:086141g9805
Re: typical standard deviation?Henry Halboth19 Sep 2009, 19:0138943g9804
Re: Noon sun fix exampleHewitt Schlereth19 Sep 2009, 14:05580010g9803
Re: How Many Chronometers?John H19 Sep 2009, 12:138944g9802
Re: Mapping softwareMarcel Tschudin19 Sep 2009, 10:476862g9801
Re: Mapping softwareMarcel Tschudin19 Sep 2009, 09:528338g9800
Re: 5000 (terrestrial) navigation system?NavList Messages18 Sep 2009, 05:516756g9799
Re: How Many Chronometers?Lu Abel19 Sep 2009, 03:227045g9798
Re: How Many Chronometers?Lu Abel19 Sep 2009, 03:015780g9797
Re: How Many Chronometers?John H18 Sep 2009, 23:306938g9796
Re: How Many Chronometers?Byron Franklin18 Sep 2009, 22:545863g9795
Re: How Many Chronometers?John H18 Sep 2009, 21:086679g9794
Mapping softwareJohn H18 Sep 2009, 19:598913g9793
Re: How Many Chronometers?Byron Franklin18 Sep 2009, 17:497106g9792
Re: Noon sun fix exampleAndrés Ruiz18 Sep 2009, 14:20419382g9791
Re: Mercury Lunar helpAndrés Ruiz18 Sep 2009, 06:24122010g9790
Re: Mercury Lunar helpPeter Hakel18 Sep 2009, 05:1412071g9789
Flight 19 routePaul Hirose18 Sep 2009, 04:5211536g9788
Re: Noon sun fix examplePeter Hakel18 Sep 2009, 02:59195266g9787
Re: Mercury Lunar helpBrad Morris18 Sep 2009, 01:2316918g9786
Re: Mercury Lunar helpBrad Morris18 Sep 2009, 01:1913083g9785
Noon sun fix exampleJeremy C17 Sep 2009, 23:5210244g9784
Re: typical standard deviation?Jeremy C17 Sep 2009, 23:5234400g9783
Mercury Lunar helpJeremy C17 Sep 2009, 23:528366g9782
Re: GPS as a time authorityDouglas Denny17 Sep 2009, 23:059346g9781
Re: GPS as a time authorityWerner Luehmann17 Sep 2009, 17:428500g9780
Re: How Many Chronometers?George Huxtable17 Sep 2009, 10:1110135g9779
Re: 5000 (terrestrial) navigation system?Douglas Denny17 Sep 2009, 10:0910379g9778
Re: 5000 (terrestrial) navigation system?George Huxtable17 Sep 2009, 08:578183g9777
Re: GPS as a time authorityDouglas Denny17 Sep 2009, 07:548053g9776
Re: 5000 (terrestrial) navigation system?Brad Morris17 Sep 2009, 02:237447g9775
Re: GPS as a time authorityLu Abel17 Sep 2009, 01:318766g9774
5000 (terrestrial) navigation system?Lu Abel17 Sep 2009, 00:3888072g9773
Re: GPS as a time authorityDouglas Denny16 Sep 2009, 23:588746g9772
Re: How Many Chronometers?John H16 Sep 2009, 22:217753g9771
Re: On LOPsByron Franklin16 Sep 2009, 22:04261740g9770
Re: GPS as a time authorityThomas Kleemann16 Sep 2009, 21:367214g9769
Re: How Many Chronometers?Greg R_16 Sep 2009, 20:1420139g9768
Re: How Many Chronometers?Brad Morris16 Sep 2009, 19:1735178g9767
Re: How Many Chronometers?Gary LaPook16 Sep 2009, 17:3730893g9766
Re: GPS as a time authorityDouglas Denny16 Sep 2009, 16:5112413g9765
Re: How Many Chronometers?John H16 Sep 2009, 14:118782g9764
Re: GPS as a time authorityPhilip Lange16 Sep 2009, 13:275045g9763
Re: GPS as a time authorityPeter Smith16 Sep 2009, 12:586709g9762
Re: GPS as a time authorityRichard B. Langley16 Sep 2009, 12:217472g9761
Re: How Many Chronometers?George Huxtable16 Sep 2009, 07:3714711g9760
Re: GPS as a time authorityBrad Morris16 Sep 2009, 03:5211272g9759
Re: How Many Chronometers?Tom Sult16 Sep 2009, 00:5010394g9758
Re: How Many Chronometers?Gary LaPook16 Sep 2009, 00:3418399g9757
Re: GPS as a time authorityJ Parsons15 Sep 2009, 21:575897g9756
Re: GPS as a time authorityC Sellars15 Sep 2009, 20:065921g9755
Re: GPS as a time authorityPeter Smith15 Sep 2009, 20:178615g9754
Re: GPS as a time authorityDouglas Denny15 Sep 2009, 19:306276g9753
Re: GPS as a time authorityDouglas Denny15 Sep 2009, 19:179778g9752
Re: GPS as a time authorityRichard B. Langley15 Sep 2009, 18:547590g9751
Re: GPS as a time authorityPeter Smith15 Sep 2009, 18:319160g9750
Re: How Many Chronometers?Werner Luehmann15 Sep 2009, 18:3111352g9749
Re: GPS as a time authorityLu Abel15 Sep 2009, 18:257162g9748
Re: GPS as a time authorityAntoine Couëtte15 Sep 2009, 18:206097g9747
Re: How Many Chronometers?Gary LaPook15 Sep 2009, 18:137759g9746
Re: GPS as a time authorityLu Abel15 Sep 2009, 18:065708g9745
Re: GPS as a time authorityGeorge Huxtable15 Sep 2009, 18:019562g9744
Re: How Many Chronometers?Greg Rudzinski15 Sep 2009, 17:565152g9743
Re: How Many Chronometers?Greg Rudzinski15 Sep 2009, 17:488430g9742
Re: How Many Chronometers?John H15 Sep 2009, 17:427514g9741
Re: How Many Chronometers?Greg Rudzinski15 Sep 2009, 17:407664g9740
Re: GPS as a time authorityDouglas Denny15 Sep 2009, 17:269739g9739
Re: How Many Chronometers?Gary LaPook15 Sep 2009, 17:249403g9738
Re: How Many Chronometers?Werner Luehmann15 Sep 2009, 17:218375g9737
Re: GPS as a time authorityLu Abel15 Sep 2009, 17:1812711g9736
Re: GPS as a time authorityRichard B. Langley15 Sep 2009, 17:149133g9735
Re: How Many Chronometers?Gary LaPook15 Sep 2009, 17:068084g9734
Re: GPS as a time authorityLu Abel15 Sep 2009, 16:527173g9733
Re: How Many Chronometers?Lu Abel15 Sep 2009, 16:0914175g9732
Re: GPS as a time authorityAntoine Couëtte15 Sep 2009, 15:427168g9731
Re: How Many Chronometers?John H15 Sep 2009, 13:408064g9730
Felsenthal bubble circle sextantDouglas Simpson15 Sep 2009, 12:226423g9729
Re: How Many Chronometers?Tom Sult15 Sep 2009, 11:257729g9728
Re: How Many Chronometers?Tom Sult15 Sep 2009, 11:227752g9727
Re: How Many Chronometers?Frank Reed15 Sep 2009, 11:255439g9726
Re: Mystic Seaport and Don TreworgyFrank Reed15 Sep 2009, 11:245395g9725
Re: How Many Chronometers?Gary LaPook15 Sep 2009, 09:221824143g9724
Re: GPS as a time authorityLu Abel15 Sep 2009, 03:457371g9723
Mystic Seaport and Don TreworgyFrank Reed14 Sep 2009, 23:4692391g9722
Re: GPS as a time authorityJames N Wilson14 Sep 2009, 21:427455g9721
Re: On LOPsByron Franklin14 Sep 2009, 21:427079g9720
Re: GPS as a time authorityNicolàs de Hilster14 Sep 2009, 21:137993g9719
GPS as a time authorityJ Parsons14 Sep 2009, 16:056176g9718
Arctic refractionGeorge Huxtable14 Sep 2009, 08:3211106g9717
Re: Etymology of "loom"?John H13 Sep 2009, 13:538294g9716
Re: Etymology of "loom"?Bill B13 Sep 2009, 07:357017g9715
A glimpse of the sun from the other side of the bottomof the earthPeter Fogg13 Sep 2009, 02:047950g9714
Re: Etymology of "loom"?Frank Reed13 Sep 2009, 01:579533g9713
Re: Etymology of "loom"?John H12 Sep 2009, 17:328745g9712
Re: Etymology of "loom"?George Huxtable12 Sep 2009, 17:047032g9711
Re: Etymology of "loom"?John H12 Sep 2009, 16:337976g9710
Re: Etymology of "loom"?John H12 Sep 2009, 16:2411802g9709
Re: A curious WW2 german magazinePhilip Lange12 Sep 2009, 13:475591g9708
Re: A curious WW2 german magazineBill Morris11 Sep 2009, 20:257041g9707
Re: Etymology of "loom"?John H11 Sep 2009, 11:5510199g9706
A curious WW2 german magazineAndrés Ruiz11 Sep 2009, 10:0982646g9705
Re: Index Card for Trig/Log TableGary LaPook11 Sep 2009, 07:2011024g9704
Re: Etymology of "loom"?Frank Reed10 Sep 2009, 23:5112752g9703
Re: Etymology of "loom"?Andrew Corl10 Sep 2009, 22:009742g9702
Re: Index Card for Trig/Log TableGreg Rudzinski10 Sep 2009, 21:289115g9701
Re: Index Card for Trig/Log TableGeorge Huxtable10 Sep 2009, 19:318616g9700
Re: Etymology of "loom"?Gary LaPook10 Sep 2009, 17:227522g9699
Etymology of "loom"?John H10 Sep 2009, 16:127602g9698
Re: Index Card for Trig/Log TableGreg Rudzinski10 Sep 2009, 15:588909g9697
Re: Nevil Maskelyne's SignatureBrad Morris10 Sep 2009, 13:037460g9696
Re: Index Card for Trig/Log TableGreg Rudzinski10 Sep 2009, 11:308506g9695
Re: [9686] compass pointsGeorge Huxtable10 Sep 2009, 10:423899667g9694
Re: Index Card for Trig/Log TableGeorge Huxtable10 Sep 2009, 10:1510109g9693
Re: Index Card for Trig/Log TableAndrés Ruiz10 Sep 2009, 05:476859g9692
Re: Index Card for Trig/Log TableGreg Rudzinski10 Sep 2009, 00:465778g9691
Re: Index Card for Trig/Log TableHewitt Schlereth9 Sep 2009, 21:127428g9690
Re: Should I question Pliny?George Huxtable8 Sep 2009, 23:399388g9689
Re: An aircraft with a sextantPeter Fogg8 Sep 2009, 22:4910582g9688
Re: An aircraft with a sextantDerrick Young8 Sep 2009, 18:408350g9687
Compass pointsNavList Messages8 Sep 2009, 18:387104g9686
Index Card for Trig/Log TableGreg Rudzinski8 Sep 2009, 20:22533906g9685
Re: Coriolis and gyrosPeter Hakel8 Sep 2009, 18:3142373g9684
Re: Flood myth musingBrad Morris8 Sep 2009, 17:4011838g9683
Flood myth musingJohn H8 Sep 2009, 16:5312723g9682
Re: Coriolis and gyrosJohn H8 Sep 2009, 14:187633g9681
Re: Does anyone know the history of this instrument?Paul Saffo8 Sep 2009, 13:354412g9680
Re: Coriolis and gyrosGary LaPook8 Sep 2009, 10:5020498g9679
Does anyone know the history of this instrument?Bruce Hamilton8 Sep 2009, 01:206090g9678
Re: The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?W F Jones7 Sep 2009, 13:218244g9677
Re: Should I question Pliny?Frank Reed7 Sep 2009, 01:568542g9676
Re: Should I question Pliny?Frank Reed6 Sep 2009, 23:486455g9675
Re: Should I question Pliny?John H6 Sep 2009, 22:336938g9674
Bygrave and AquinoGary LaPook6 Sep 2009, 15:218049g9673
Re: Should I question Pliny?George Huxtable6 Sep 2009, 10:4711281g9672
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DByron Franklin6 Sep 2009, 00:406406g9671
9471Byron Franklin5 Sep 2009, 18:596139g9670
Re: Should I question Pliny?John H5 Sep 2009, 16:2212862g9669
Re: Should I question Pliny?Tom Sult5 Sep 2009, 11:0213091g9668
Re: Should I question Pliny?Frank Reed4 Sep 2009, 23:378351g9667
Should I question Pliny?John H4 Sep 2009, 21:4712474g9666
Re: Coriolis and gyros (second attempt)(typoscorrected)Frank Reed4 Sep 2009, 05:578431g9665
Re: Coriolis and gyrosFrank Reed4 Sep 2009, 05:5117641g9664
Re: Searching the archive.Frank Reed3 Sep 2009, 01:297474g9663
Jupiter without moonsFrank Reed2 Sep 2009, 23:055277g9662
Lunars on a whaling voyage: 1847-1850Frank Reed2 Sep 2009, 22:2010065g9661
An aircraft with a sextantFrank Reed2 Sep 2009, 20:505825g9660
Re: sea feverGreg Rudzinski1 Sep 2009, 16:096747g9659
Sea feverGeorge Huxtable1 Sep 2009, 13:017700g9658
Hagner newsreelDave Walden31 Aug 2009, 16:456619g9657
Re: Searching the archive.Gary LaPook31 Aug 2009, 08:274517g9656
Re: Hughes Bubble sextant Mk IXABill Morris30 Aug 2009, 10:506842g9655
Modification to 2102-DByron Franklin29 Aug 2009, 22:13337241g9654
Re: "dead reckoning" in GermanRonald van Riet29 Aug 2009, 12:164409g9653
Re: Nevil Maskelyne's SignatureBrad Morris29 Aug 2009, 01:415305g9652
Re: "dead reckoning" in GermanThomas Kleemann28 Aug 2009, 22:075227g9651
Nevil Maskelyne's SignatureBrad Morris28 Aug 2009, 17:247235g9650
Re: Hughes Bubble sextant Mk IXABill Morris28 Aug 2009, 02:285573g9649
Re: Hughes Bubble sextant Mk IXAGary LaPook28 Aug 2009, 00:185934g9648
Re: Hughes Bubble sextant Mk IXAGary LaPook28 Aug 2009, 00:108119g9647
I'm the newest memberBill Cope26 Aug 2009, 15:198183g9646
Re: Hughes Bubble sextant Mk IXANavList Messages27 Aug 2009, 15:347293g9645
Re: "dead reckoning" in GermanMarcel Tschudin27 Aug 2009, 08:317048g9644
Re: "dead reckoning" in GermanMarcel Tschudin27 Aug 2009, 08:267093g9643
Re: "dead reckoning" in GermanPeter Fogg27 Aug 2009, 08:237836g9642
"dead reckoning" in GermanRonald van Riet27 Aug 2009, 08:204274g9641
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix26 Aug 2009, 23:5016089g9640
Re: Tracking down a referenceGary LaPook26 Aug 2009, 21:544914g9639
Re: Tracking down a referenceWolfgang Köberer26 Aug 2009, 19:079424g9638
Re: sextant for use on landGeoffrey Kolbe26 Aug 2009, 18:4411407g9637
Re: Tracking down a referenceJohn H26 Aug 2009, 15:1611291g9636
Re: sextant for use on landRonald P Barrett26 Aug 2009, 15:009527g9635
Re: sextant for use on landNavList Messages26 Aug 2009, 07:296833g9634
Re: Coriolis and gyros (second attempt)(typoscorrected)Gary LaPook25 Aug 2009, 23:4213211g9633
Re: PIM: Precision Indication of the MeridianPeter Hakel25 Aug 2009, 22:5910168g9632
Re: Coriolis and gyros (second attempt)(typoscorrected)Peter Hakel25 Aug 2009, 22:5826739g9631
PIM: Precision Indication of the MeridianDouglas Denny25 Aug 2009, 19:346892g9630
Daytime VenusGreg Rudzinski25 Aug 2009, 18:444676g9629
Re: Tracking down a referenceGeorge Huxtable25 Aug 2009, 18:37684652g9628
Re: Sextant RepairsDouglas Denny25 Aug 2009, 18:06127554g9627
Re: Sextant RepairsDouglas Denny25 Aug 2009, 17:47252230g9626
Tracking down a referenceJohn H25 Aug 2009, 17:448017g9625
Re: Sextant RepairsBrad Morris25 Aug 2009, 12:365567g9624
Re: The development of bubble sextantsJean-Philippe Planas25 Aug 2009, 12:1723941g9623
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGeorge Huxtable25 Aug 2009, 09:107303g9622
Re: Coriolis and gyros (second attempt)(typoscorrected)Gary LaPook25 Aug 2009, 08:5912679g9621
Re: Coriolis and gyros (second attempt)(typoscorrected)Gary LaPook25 Aug 2009, 08:5120576g9620
Re: The development of bubble sextantsBill Morris25 Aug 2009, 05:347826g9619
Re: Coriolis and gyros (second attempt)(typoscorrected)Peter Hakel25 Aug 2009, 03:2918126g9618
Re: Sextant RepairsNavList Messages19 Aug 2009, 23:136803g9617
The development of bubble sextantsPeter Hollings24 Aug 2009, 18:2715529g9616
Re: Uh oh, time to redo the Nautical AlmanacBrad Morris24 Aug 2009, 21:466616g9615
Re: Coriolis and gyros (second attempt)(typoscorrected)Gary LaPook24 Aug 2009, 17:2910108g9614
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DByron Franklin24 Aug 2009, 16:33240056g9613
Uh oh, time to redo the Nautical AlmanacLu Abel24 Aug 2009, 16:135738g9612
Re: Coriolis and gyros (second attempt)(typoscorrected)Frank Reed24 Aug 2009, 13:387142g9611
Re: Lost people DO follow circles, says researchBill B24 Aug 2009, 04:036413g9610
Re: Lost people DO follow circles, says researchGeorge Huxtable23 Aug 2009, 15:1412330g9609
Searching the archive.Gary LaPook23 Aug 2009, 14:216958g9608
Re: Coriolis and gyros (second attempt)(typoscorrected)Gary LaPook23 Aug 2009, 14:1610279g9607
Re: Coriolis and gyros (second attempt)(typoscorrected)Gary LaPook23 Aug 2009, 14:10906083g9606
Re: Coriolis and gyrosGary LaPook23 Aug 2009, 13:39906134g9605
Re: Lost people DO follow circles, says researchDouglas Denny23 Aug 2009, 00:4510012g9604
Re: Lost people DO follow circles, says researchGeorge Huxtable22 Aug 2009, 20:127572g9603
Walking straightDoug22 Aug 2009, 17:306454g9602
Re: Which diameter of the sun in digital photos ?Marcel Tschudin22 Aug 2009, 14:1210864g9601
Re: Lost people DO follow circles, says researchJohn H22 Aug 2009, 13:479080g9600
Re: Lost people DO follow circles, says researchGeorge Huxtable22 Aug 2009, 13:209220g9599
Re: Lost people DO follow circles, says researchPhilip Lange22 Aug 2009, 10:569962g9598
Re: Lost people DO follow circles, says researchJames N Wilson22 Aug 2009, 03:177713g9597
Re: Lost people DO follow circles, says researchMichael Dorl22 Aug 2009, 01:388593g9596
Re: Lost people DO follow circles, says researchPeter Fogg22 Aug 2009, 00:068846g9595
Re: Which diameter of the sun in digital photos ?George Huxtable21 Aug 2009, 23:199677g9594
Re: Which diameter of the sun in digital photos ?Bill B21 Aug 2009, 22:337099g9593
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix21 Aug 2009, 21:5517108g9592
Re: Lost people DO follow circles, says researchJohn H21 Aug 2009, 21:387776g9591
Re: Which diameter of the sun in digital photos ?Greg Rudzinski21 Aug 2009, 20:256413g9590
Re: Which diameter of the sun in digital photos ?Marcel Tschudin21 Aug 2009, 19:387580g9589
Re: Which diameter of the sun in digital photos ?Greg Rudzinski21 Aug 2009, 18:496513g9588
Re: Which diameter of the sun in digital photos ?Greg Rudzinski21 Aug 2009, 18:265911g9587
Re: Which diameter of the sun in digital photos ?Marcel Tschudin21 Aug 2009, 18:198112g9586
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGeorge Huxtable21 Aug 2009, 15:398994g9585
Re: Which diameter of the sun in digital photos ?George Huxtable21 Aug 2009, 14:558293g9584
Which diameter of the sun in digital photos ?Marcel Tschudin21 Aug 2009, 11:497454g9583
Re: Lost people DO follow circles, says researchDouglas Denny21 Aug 2009, 11:499555g9582
Re: missing messageGary LaPook21 Aug 2009, 07:236047g9581
Re: missing messageFrank Reed21 Aug 2009, 01:477570g9580
Lost people DO follow circles, says researchPeter Fogg21 Aug 2009, 00:4714590g9579
Missing messageGary LaPook20 Aug 2009, 18:475093g9578
Missing messageGary LaPook20 Aug 2009, 18:436279g9577
[Fwd: Re: Coriolis and gyros]Gary LaPook20 Aug 2009, 18:33376527g9576
Re: Coriolis and gyrosGary LaPook20 Aug 2009, 17:40375699g9575
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix20 Aug 2009, 15:3422594g9574
Re: Coriolis and gyrosJohn H20 Aug 2009, 13:5412766g9573
Coriolis and gyrosFrank Reed20 Aug 2009, 13:028208g9572
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook20 Aug 2009, 09:3318467g9571
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix18 Aug 2009, 22:3037115g9570
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGeorge Huxtable18 Aug 2009, 20:1215735g9569
Re: welcome.Antoine Couëtte18 Aug 2009, 15:127064g9568
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix18 Aug 2009, 18:0318684g9567
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook18 Aug 2009, 18:0010494g9566
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix18 Aug 2009, 17:4219516g9565
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix18 Aug 2009, 17:0214887g9564
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook18 Aug 2009, 13:1211190g9563
Re: The development of bubble sextantsDouglas Denny18 Aug 2009, 11:567318g9562
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGeorge Huxtable18 Aug 2009, 10:4410095g9561
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook18 Aug 2009, 10:069512g9560
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix18 Aug 2009, 03:571854619g9559
Re: Manufacture of BygravesTom Sult18 Aug 2009, 02:3210304g9558
Re: The development of bubble sextantsPaul Hirose17 Aug 2009, 22:456394g9557
Re: Manufacture of BygravesGary LaPook17 Aug 2009, 21:4310086g9556
Celestial nav for BlackberryJim Hickey17 Aug 2009, 19:114476g9555
Re: The development of bubble sextantsLu Abel17 Aug 2009, 18:247331g9554
Re: Mark IX sextant manualPaul Brewer17 Aug 2009, 12:156833g9553
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook17 Aug 2009, 12:1423573g9552
Re: Mark IX sextant manualHein Bodahl17 Aug 2009, 10:297545g9551
Re: Navigation gathering: Mystic, Spring 2010Brad Morris17 Aug 2009, 00:526596g9550
Re: The development of bubble sextantsPeter Hakel16 Aug 2009, 23:4922224g9549
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook16 Aug 2009, 22:5911916g9548
Re: The development of bubble sextantsDouglas Denny16 Aug 2009, 21:225569g9547
Re: Navigation gathering: Mystic, Spring 2010Stan K16 Aug 2009, 16:2118303g9546
Re: ephemeris & positional astronomy Windows DLLFrank Reed16 Aug 2009, 15:396497g9545
Re: ephemeris & positional astronomy Windows DLLMichael Dorl16 Aug 2009, 13:575875g9544
Re: typical standard deviation?Jeremy C16 Aug 2009, 12:1713032g9543
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook16 Aug 2009, 01:1211779g9542
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook15 Aug 2009, 23:5112385g9541
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook15 Aug 2009, 23:479624g9540
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix15 Aug 2009, 20:2214606g9539
Re: typical standard deviation?Henry Halboth15 Aug 2009, 19:3034992g9538
Re: Navigation gathering: Mystic, Spring 2010Ronald P Barrett15 Aug 2009, 19:2616218g9537
Re: ephemeris & positional astronomy Windows DLLPaul Hirose15 Aug 2009, 19:008749g9536
Navigation gathering: Mystic, Spring 2010Frank Reed15 Aug 2009, 18:527886g9535
Re: typical standard deviation?Frank Reed15 Aug 2009, 17:219301g9534
First Artificial Horizon.Clive Sutherland15 Aug 2009, 16:40261011g9533
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsBrad Morris15 Aug 2009, 16:255360g9532
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix15 Aug 2009, 16:1913620g9531
Re: typical standard deviation?Jeremy C15 Aug 2009, 15:5513612g9530
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsJeremy C15 Aug 2009, 15:5510386g9529
Re: The development of bubble sextantsFrank Reed15 Aug 2009, 15:539324g9528
Re: The development of bubble sextantsFrank Reed15 Aug 2009, 15:268353g9527
Re: ephemeris & positional astronomy Windows DLLNavList Messages15 Aug 2009, 12:406829g9526
Re: The development of bubble sextantsDouglas Denny15 Aug 2009, 13:477646g9525
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook15 Aug 2009, 10:597997g9524
Re: The development of bubble sextantsDouglas Denny15 Aug 2009, 09:436412g9523
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DByron Franklin15 Aug 2009, 00:356421g9522
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook15 Aug 2009, 00:27837984g9521
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook15 Aug 2009, 00:0719632g9520
Re: The development of bubble sextantsDouglas Denny14 Aug 2009, 23:557316g9519
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix14 Aug 2009, 23:5132742g9518
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix14 Aug 2009, 23:5132783g9517
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix14 Aug 2009, 23:4019243g9516
Re: The development of bubble sextantsBrad Morris14 Aug 2009, 20:487602g9515
Re: Advice on SextantBill Morris14 Aug 2009, 20:165882g9514
Re: The development of bubble sextantsClive Sutherland14 Aug 2009, 20:06211807g9513
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGeorge Huxtable14 Aug 2009, 18:5515513g9512
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix14 Aug 2009, 17:0823846g9511
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGeorge Huxtable14 Aug 2009, 15:2110071g9510
Re: Advice on SextantNavList Messages14 Aug 2009, 13:445906g9509
Re: The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook14 Aug 2009, 09:2817105g9508
Re: The development of bubble sextantsBill Morris14 Aug 2009, 09:118170g9507
Re: The development of bubble sextantsHanno Ix14 Aug 2009, 05:1614687g9506
Re: slide rule sight reduction accuracyGary LaPook14 Aug 2009, 00:478601g9505
Re: typical standard deviation?M v Noorden13 Aug 2009, 09:076502g9504
Re: Modifications to 2102-DGary LaPook13 Aug 2009, 21:241005771g9503
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsChristian Scheele13 Aug 2009, 20:468562g9502
CotterChristian Scheele13 Aug 2009, 20:378697g9501
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Christian Scheele13 Aug 2009, 19:466420g9500
Re: Modifications to 2102-DBrad Morris13 Aug 2009, 18:158133g9499
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DByron Franklin13 Aug 2009, 17:545177g9498
Re: Fw: Grounding of cruiser PORT ROYALGary LaPook13 Aug 2009, 17:407686g9497
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DByron Franklin13 Aug 2009, 17:365451g9496
Re: Modifications to 2102-DGary LaPook13 Aug 2009, 17:155270g9495
Re: Modifications to 2102-DGary LaPook13 Aug 2009, 17:126155g9494
Re: Modifications to 2102-DByron Franklin13 Aug 2009, 15:436844g9493
Re: slide rule sight reduction accuracyHein Bodahl13 Aug 2009, 10:40486143g9492
Re: The development of bubble sextantsBill Morris13 Aug 2009, 07:035257g9491
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DByron Franklin13 Aug 2009, 00:307219g9490
Re: The development of bubble sextantsDouglas Simpson13 Aug 2009, 00:157094g9489
The development of bubble sextantsGary LaPook12 Aug 2009, 23:085135g9488
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DGary LaPook12 Aug 2009, 22:33235422g9487
Re: software to draw scalesHanno Ix12 Aug 2009, 20:1911632g9486
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DBrad Morris12 Aug 2009, 17:599296g9485
Re: software to draw scalesHanno Ix12 Aug 2009, 17:2610460g9484
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DByron Franklin12 Aug 2009, 17:16229879g9483
Re: typical standard deviation?Jeremy C12 Aug 2009, 14:5521443g9482
Re: typical standard deviation?Gary LaPook12 Aug 2009, 12:4017566g9481
Re: typical standard deviation?George Huxtable12 Aug 2009, 09:5611151g9480
Typical standard deviation?Jeremy C12 Aug 2009, 06:3511410g9479
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DByron Franklin12 Aug 2009, 01:346613g9478
Software to draw scalesAndrew Nikitin12 Aug 2009, 01:286798g9477
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsGeorge Huxtable11 Aug 2009, 23:5463587g9476
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsJames N Wilson11 Aug 2009, 19:108525g9475
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsChristian Scheele11 Aug 2009, 18:197708g9474
Re: Mark IX sextant manualPaul Brewer11 Aug 2009, 14:597104g9473
Re: Mark IX sextant manualHein Bodahl11 Aug 2009, 12:026991g9472
Modifacation to 2102-DByron Franklin11 Aug 2009, 11:534366g9471
Re: Mark IX sextant manualHein Bodahl11 Aug 2009, 11:456856g9470
Re: Mark IX sextant manualHein Bodahl11 Aug 2009, 11:396984g9469
Re: Mark IX sextant manualPaul Brewer11 Aug 2009, 11:396035g9468
Re: Mark IX sextant manualRichard Dunn11 Aug 2009, 09:556294g9467
Re: Mark IX sextant manualDouglas Simpson11 Aug 2009, 05:458302g9466
Byrd Sextant (or should it be "de Florez Sextant"Bill Morris11 Aug 2009, 05:416763g9465
Mark IX sextant manualBill Morris11 Aug 2009, 05:27220353g9464
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsGeorge Huxtable10 Aug 2009, 23:368458g9463
Re: Modification to 2102-DBrad Morris10 Aug 2009, 20:058852g9462
Re: NavList 9435] Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2partsBrad Morris10 Aug 2009, 17:0714099g9461
Re: NavList 9435] Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2partsPeter Hakel10 Aug 2009, 16:4410828g9460
NavList 9435] Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsGeorge Huxtable10 Aug 2009, 14:0094176g9459
Re: Usefulness of the slope techniquePeter Fogg10 Aug 2009, 11:5110528g9458
Re: kollsman periscopic sextantDouglas Simpson10 Aug 2009, 11:389107g9457
Re: Clarification offered and requested Re: Multi-Moonlin...Jeremy C10 Aug 2009, 09:5918930g9456
Re: kollsman periscopic sextantDouglas Simpson10 Aug 2009, 00:418110g9455
Re: kollsman periscopic sextantDouglas Simpson10 Aug 2009, 00:409673g9454
Re: Clarification offered and requested Re: Multi-Moonline exercise in 2 partsPeter Hakel9 Aug 2009, 23:3312264g9453
Re: Clarification offered and requested Re: Multi-Moonline exercise in 2 partsNavList Messages9 Aug 2009, 21:0713087g9452
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance.George Huxtable9 Aug 2009, 19:589610g9451
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance.George Huxtable9 Aug 2009, 19:307740g9450
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance.Hanno Ix9 Aug 2009, 18:4018300g9449
MARK 5 bubble sextant manualGary LaPook9 Aug 2009, 18:22460340g9448
MK IX bubble sextant manualGary LaPook9 Aug 2009, 18:205074g9447
Re: Manufacture of BygravesBrad Morris9 Aug 2009, 18:1918625g9446
CHO-T (SNO-T) sextant manualGary LaPook9 Aug 2009, 18:175107g9445
Balldrop sextant manualGary LaPook9 Aug 2009, 18:145160g9444
A-12 bubble sextant manualGary LaPook9 Aug 2009, 16:196200g9443
A-6 bubble sextant manualGary LaPook9 Aug 2009, 16:156137g9442
A-5 and A-7 bubble sextant manualGary LaPook9 Aug 2009, 16:136098g9441
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsPeter Hakel9 Aug 2009, 16:0923616g9440
Manuals for Kollsman MA-1 sextantGary LaPook9 Aug 2009, 15:57686042g9439
Re: kollsman periscopic sextantGary LaPook9 Aug 2009, 15:496431g9438
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance.Geoffrey Kolbe9 Aug 2009, 15:465902g9437
Re: kollsman periscopic sextantGary LaPook9 Aug 2009, 15:215022g9436
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsJeremy C9 Aug 2009, 15:167917g9435
Kollsman periscopic sextantDouglas Simpson9 Aug 2009, 14:336701g9434
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance.Nicolàs de Hilster9 Aug 2009, 14:178706g9433
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance.George Huxtable9 Aug 2009, 14:0310409g9432
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance.Geoffrey Kolbe9 Aug 2009, 10:089401g9431
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance.George Huxtable9 Aug 2009, 09:078527g9430
Re: Manufacture of BygravesGary LaPook9 Aug 2009, 07:50132371g9429
Re: Manufacture of BygravesGary LaPook9 Aug 2009, 07:3911187g9428
Re: Manufacture of BygravesWolfgang Köberer9 Aug 2009, 07:347999g9427
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsBill B9 Aug 2009, 07:316841g9426
Re: Manufacture of BygravesHanno Ix9 Aug 2009, 04:4117263g9425
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance.Hanno Ix9 Aug 2009, 04:3830039g9424
Re: Manufacture of BygravesBrad Morris9 Aug 2009, 03:199642g9423
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance.Brad Morris9 Aug 2009, 02:4427671g9422
Modification to 2102-DByron Franklin9 Aug 2009, 00:045781g9421
Usefulness of the slope techniquePeter Fogg9 Aug 2009, 00:5013048g9420
Welcome.George Huxtable8 Aug 2009, 23:416102g9419
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsPeter Fogg8 Aug 2009, 22:106996g9418
Re: Proposed FULL RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Re:Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsNavList Messages8 Aug 2009, 17:5314593g9417
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance.Hanno Ix8 Aug 2009, 17:1519270g9416
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsPeter Hakel8 Aug 2009, 16:2911600g9415
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsJeremy C8 Aug 2009, 14:058200g9414
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsJeremy C8 Aug 2009, 13:5617215g9413
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsGeorge Huxtable8 Aug 2009, 13:366242g9412
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance.George Huxtable8 Aug 2009, 13:128278g9411
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsPeter Hakel8 Aug 2009, 03:5416082g9410
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsPeter Hakel8 Aug 2009, 03:5024952g9409
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance. Was- Re: Working a lunarHanno Ix8 Aug 2009, 03:0619834g9408
Re: Modification to 2102-DBrad Morris7 Aug 2009, 23:0418616g9407
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DGary LaPook7 Aug 2009, 22:2015577g9406
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DBrad Morris7 Aug 2009, 19:2410131g9405
Re: Modifacation to 2102-DGreg Rudzinski7 Aug 2009, 18:468072g9404
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance. Was- Re: Working a lunarBrad Morris7 Aug 2009, 16:2310085g9403
Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance. Was- Re: Working a lunarGeorge Huxtable7 Aug 2009, 15:076891g9402
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance. Was- Re: Working a lunarHenry Halboth7 Aug 2009, 15:068560g9401
Re: Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance. Was- Re: Working a lunarBrad Morris7 Aug 2009, 14:2511699g9400
Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance. Was- Re: Working a lunarGeorge Huxtable7 Aug 2009, 14:158097g9399
Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance. Was- Re: Working a lunarGeorge Huxtable7 Aug 2009, 13:598894g9398
Modifacation to 2102-DByron Franklin6 Aug 2009, 19:408109g9397
Lunar longitudes, not by lunar distance. Was- Re: Working a lunarGeorge Huxtable7 Aug 2009, 09:3614209g9396
Re: Working a lunar - a PSHanno Ix7 Aug 2009, 00:3021721g9395
Re: Working a lunar - a PSGeorge Huxtable7 Aug 2009, 00:0210829g9394
Re: Working a lunar - a PSHanno Ix6 Aug 2009, 23:3819154g9393
Re: Working a lunar - a PSBrad Morris6 Aug 2009, 20:3420375g9392
Re: Working a lunarChristian Scheele6 Aug 2009, 20:3029175g9391
Re: Single-body fix methodChristian Scheele6 Aug 2009, 20:0316918g9390
Re: Working a lunarChristian Scheele6 Aug 2009, 19:5034073g9389
Re: Working a lunarHanno Ix6 Aug 2009, 17:3423413g9388
Re: Single-body fix methodJeremy C6 Aug 2009, 13:4715205g9387
Re: Working a lunarGeorge Huxtable6 Aug 2009, 07:1410103g9386
Re: Working a lunarGeorge Huxtable6 Aug 2009, 08:2911827g9385
Re: Working a lunar - a PSHanno Ix6 Aug 2009, 06:3918273g9384
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsJeremy C6 Aug 2009, 06:226130g9383
Re: Working a lunarHanno Ix6 Aug 2009, 05:5714988g9382
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Bill B6 Aug 2009, 05:485557g9381
Re: Green flashesHanno Ix6 Aug 2009, 03:5113583g9380
Re: Green flashesScott Owen6 Aug 2009, 03:318636g9379
Manufacture of BygravesGary LaPook6 Aug 2009, 03:198330g9378
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGary LaPook5 Aug 2009, 22:3911219g9377
Single-body fix methodChristian Scheele5 Aug 2009, 19:098726g9376
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterChristian Scheele5 Aug 2009, 18:5911139g9375
Re: Franklin Piloting TechniqueBrad Morris5 Aug 2009, 18:276536g9374
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Ken Gebhart5 Aug 2009, 18:205466g9373
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsNavList Messages5 Aug 2009, 17:308126g9372
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsPeter Hakel5 Aug 2009, 17:0177799g9371
Re: The BygraveHanno Ix5 Aug 2009, 16:169684g9370
Re: Green flashesGreg R_5 Aug 2009, 16:0552104g9369
Green flashesJeremy C5 Aug 2009, 16:0150271g9368
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Marcel Tschudin5 Aug 2009, 14:447199g9367
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Ken Gebhart5 Aug 2009, 14:146925g9366
Re: The BygraveDouglas Denny5 Aug 2009, 13:445735g9365
Re: Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorBrad Morris5 Aug 2009, 13:4411030g9364
Re: Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorBrad Morris5 Aug 2009, 13:297294g9363
Re: Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorGary LaPook5 Aug 2009, 09:258392g9362
Re: Franklin Piloting TechniqueByron Franklin5 Aug 2009, 01:47384120g9361
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?James N Wilson5 Aug 2009, 05:256609g9360
Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 partsJeremy C5 Aug 2009, 03:3343924g9359
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Scott Owen5 Aug 2009, 03:147356g9358
Re: Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorGreg Rudzinski5 Aug 2009, 01:479907g9357
Re: The BygraveHanno Ix5 Aug 2009, 01:2912777g9356
Re: Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorIrv Haworth5 Aug 2009, 01:0910787g9355
Re: Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorGreg Rudzinski5 Aug 2009, 00:458253g9354
Re: Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorPeter Hakel5 Aug 2009, 00:089926g9353
Re: The BygraveDouglas Denny4 Aug 2009, 23:436389g9352
Re: Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorGreg Rudzinski4 Aug 2009, 23:367714g9351
Plotting in Magnetic vs TrueLu Abel4 Aug 2009, 23:316472g9350
DR PlottingLu Abel4 Aug 2009, 23:296019g9349
Re: Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorLu Abel4 Aug 2009, 22:3315143g9348
Re: Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorGreg Rudzinski4 Aug 2009, 21:337106g9347
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Hewitt Schlereth4 Aug 2009, 21:288344g9346
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Marcel Tschudin4 Aug 2009, 19:537510g9345
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?George Huxtable4 Aug 2009, 19:348287g9344
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Greg Rudzinski4 Aug 2009, 19:186394g9343
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Brad Morris4 Aug 2009, 19:167300g9342
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Marcel Tschudin4 Aug 2009, 19:116664g9341
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?George Huxtable4 Aug 2009, 19:095537g9340
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?George Huxtable4 Aug 2009, 19:026122g9339
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?George Huxtable4 Aug 2009, 18:546315g9338
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Marcel Tschudin4 Aug 2009, 18:578511g9337
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Brad Morris4 Aug 2009, 18:168153g9336
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Greg Rudzinski4 Aug 2009, 18:105795g9335
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Marcel Tschudin4 Aug 2009, 18:067235g9334
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?George Huxtable4 Aug 2009, 17:465438g9333
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Greg Rudzinski4 Aug 2009, 17:345927g9332
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?George Huxtable4 Aug 2009, 17:278746g9331
Re: Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorBrad Morris4 Aug 2009, 17:207994g9330
Re: Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorGreg Rudzinski4 Aug 2009, 17:025849g9329
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Marcel Tschudin4 Aug 2009, 16:007136g9328
Re: Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorBrad Morris4 Aug 2009, 15:416946g9327
Re: (Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?Brad Morris4 Aug 2009, 15:378422g9326
(Fwd) The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?W F Jones4 Aug 2009, 15:237044g9325
Re: The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?George Huxtable4 Aug 2009, 15:135356g9324
Magnetic Variation (Declination) CalculatorGreg Rudzinski4 Aug 2009, 15:075815g9323
Re: The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?George Huxtable4 Aug 2009, 15:035250g9322
The Most Anomalous Refraction Yet or What ?W F Jones4 Aug 2009, 13:266675g9321
A lunarian at work (test upload)Frank Reed4 Aug 2009, 11:2262994g9320
Polaris LOPGary LaPook4 Aug 2009, 08:346996g9319
Re: Advice on SextantBill Morris4 Aug 2009, 08:186851g9318
Re: Advice on SextantC Sellars3 Aug 2009, 23:436831g9317
Re: Advice on SextantJames N Wilson3 Aug 2009, 23:466568g9316
Re: Advice on SextantGreg Rudzinski3 Aug 2009, 23:196829g9315
Re: Advice on SextantGreg Rudzinski3 Aug 2009, 19:326697g9314
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGary LaPook3 Aug 2009, 17:1412038g9313
Advice on SextantPeter Hollings3 Aug 2009, 16:2111057g9312
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterChristian Scheele3 Aug 2009, 13:226498g9311
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGary LaPook3 Aug 2009, 08:4315660g9310
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGary LaPook3 Aug 2009, 08:227785g9309
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGreg R_3 Aug 2009, 02:2723268g9308
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGary LaPook2 Aug 2009, 23:4451322g9307
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGary LaPook2 Aug 2009, 23:2735277g9306
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterTom Sult2 Aug 2009, 23:1146964g9305
Franklin Piloting TechniqueByron Franklin2 Aug 2009, 21:0311429g9304
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGary LaPook2 Aug 2009, 23:0345374g9303
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGreg Rudzinski2 Aug 2009, 22:289492g9302
Re: Working a lunarPaul Hirose2 Aug 2009, 22:136749g9301
Re: almanac computationsPaul Hirose2 Aug 2009, 22:115506g9300
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterTom Sult2 Aug 2009, 21:3818441g9299
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGreg R_2 Aug 2009, 20:5819286g9298
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGreg Rudzinski2 Aug 2009, 19:1615102g9297
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGary LaPook2 Aug 2009, 18:1833579g9296
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterHewitt Schlereth2 Aug 2009, 17:0810857g9295
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGary LaPook2 Aug 2009, 16:037956g9294
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGary LaPook2 Aug 2009, 15:577581g9293
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterGary LaPook2 Aug 2009, 15:357562g9292
Re: nautical almanac information neededFrank Reed2 Aug 2009, 00:318360g9291
Nautical almanac information neededGeorge Huxtable1 Aug 2009, 22:555747g9290
Re: ebbco sextantGeorge Huxtable1 Aug 2009, 23:348018g9289
Re: Periscopic Sextant. Henry Hughes and SonDouglas Simpson1 Aug 2009, 23:2312016g9288
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterPaul Brewer1 Aug 2009, 22:386299g9287
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterDouglas Denny1 Aug 2009, 17:3511702g9286
Re: Bygrave and ChichesterTom Sult1 Aug 2009, 16:266054g9285
Re: Periscopic Sextant. Henry Hughes and SonDouglas Simpson31 Jul 2009, 08:4912559g9284
Re: The BygraveHanno Ix1 Aug 2009, 03:4013246g9283
Re: The BygraveHanno Ix1 Aug 2009, 03:3812627g9282
Bygrave and ChichesterGary LaPook1 Aug 2009, 01:596626g9281
Re: Airbus celestial portholeGary LaPook1 Aug 2009, 01:497338g9280
Piloting and Bowditch.Byron Franklin1 Aug 2009, 00:525341g9279
Re: Working a lunar. was: lunar distance in WikipediaNavList Messages31 Jul 2009, 23:265863g9278
Re: Periscopic Sextant. Henry Hughes and SonGary LaPook1 Aug 2009, 00:3412332g9277
Re: The BygraveGary LaPook1 Aug 2009, 00:247000g9276
Re: The BygraveGary LaPook1 Aug 2009, 00:236227g9275
Re: Distance by Vertical Angle AdaptationGreg Rudzinski31 Jul 2009, 19:368856g9274
Re: Distance by Vertical Angle AdaptationGreg Rudzinski31 Jul 2009, 19:128254g9273
Re: Periscopic Sextant. Henry Hughes and SonGary LaPook31 Jul 2009, 08:449795g9272
Log keepingJeremy C31 Jul 2009, 06:539698g9271
Re: Airbus celestial portholeJohn Karl31 Jul 2009, 03:274039g9270
Re: Periscopic Sextant. Henry Hughes and SonDouglas Simpson31 Jul 2009, 00:4110305g9269
Airbus celestial portholeFrank Reed30 Jul 2009, 22:355571g9268
Re: Periscopic Sextant. Henry Hughes and SonPaul Brewer30 Jul 2009, 22:286816g9267
Re: Periscopic Sextant. Henry Hughes and SonDouglas Denny30 Jul 2009, 21:266544g9266
Re: Periscopic Sextant. Henry Hughes and SonGreg Rudzinski30 Jul 2009, 21:166585g9265
Re: Periscopic Sextant. Henry Hughes and SonMike N30 Jul 2009, 20:356202g9264
Re: Distance by Vertical Angle AdaptationGreg Rudzinski30 Jul 2009, 01:517520g9263
Re: Distance by Vertical Angle AdaptationFrank Reed30 Jul 2009, 01:197944g9262
Re: Log keepingGreg Rudzinski29 Jul 2009, 23:356124g9261
Re: Periscopic Sextant. Henry Hughes and SonDouglas Denny29 Jul 2009, 22:587504g9260
Re: On lunars generallyPaul Jackson29 Jul 2009, 18:5711571g9259
Re: Distance by Vertical Angle AdaptationGreg Rudzinski29 Jul 2009, 13:596612g9258
Re: On lunars generallyJeremy C29 Jul 2009, 13:449222g9257
Log keepingJeremy C29 Jul 2009, 06:3910784g9256
Re: Distance by Vertical Angle AdaptationFrank Reed29 Jul 2009, 05:368070g9255
Re: Periscopic Sextant. Henry Hughes and SonDouglas Simpson29 Jul 2009, 01:137236g9254
Re: Log keepingFrank Reed29 Jul 2009, 02:118539g9253
Re: Periscopic Sextant. Henry Hughes and SonDouglas Simpson29 Jul 2009, 00:5410182g9252
Re: Log keepingGreg Rudzinski28 Jul 2009, 18:525949g9251
Log keepingPeter Hakel28 Jul 2009, 18:208897g9250
Re: Distance by Vertical Angle AdaptationGreg Rudzinski28 Jul 2009, 17:457715g9249
Re: Periscopic Sextant. Henry Hughes and SonPaul Brewer28 Jul 2009, 15:396407g9248
Re: Periscopic Sextant. Henry Hughes and SonRonald P Barrett28 Jul 2009, 13:419213g9247
Re: Periscopic Sextant. Henry Hughes and SonNavList Messages28 Jul 2009, 05:015542g9246
A new theoretical and practical treatise on navigationAndrés Ruiz28 Jul 2009, 09:3111888g9245
Re: Distance by Vertical Angle AdaptationGreg Rudzinski28 Jul 2009, 06:306878g9244
Re: Distance by Vertical Angle AdaptationFrank Reed28 Jul 2009, 04:258410g9243
Re: Distance by Vertical Angle AdaptationGreg Rudzinski27 Jul 2009, 14:357221g9242
Triangles and equations in navigationAndrés Ruiz27 Jul 2009, 12:1424125g9241
Re: Distance by Vertical Angle AdaptationMike Bowman27 Jul 2009, 10:256531g9240
Re: Distance by Vertical Angle AdaptationGreg Rudzinski27 Jul 2009, 05:045663g9239
Distance by Vertical Angle AdaptationGreg Rudzinski26 Jul 2009, 23:006870g9238
Re: The BygraveHanno Ix26 Jul 2009, 21:3711265g9237
Re: The BygraveBrad Morris26 Jul 2009, 17:2048811g9236
Re: The BygraveGary LaPook26 Jul 2009, 17:0353385g9235
Re: The BygraveHanno Ix26 Jul 2009, 16:3146265g9234
Re: The BygraveHanno Ix26 Jul 2009, 16:1244067g9233
3-armed protractorJeremy C26 Jul 2009, 14:14124758g9232
Voyage updateJeremy C26 Jul 2009, 14:1410073g9231
Re: The BygraveW F Jones26 Jul 2009, 12:1021788g9230
Re: The BygraveBrad Morris26 Jul 2009, 02:5539718g9229
Re: Port RoyalBill Morris25 Jul 2009, 21:02685040g9228
Almanac computationsPaul Hirose25 Jul 2009, 20:538513g9227
Re: The BygraveHanno Ix25 Jul 2009, 18:5433983g9226
Re: The BygraveHanno Ix25 Jul 2009, 18:459391g9225
Re: The BygraveBrad Morris25 Jul 2009, 18:0230731g9224
Re: The BygraveBrad Morris25 Jul 2009, 17:4123488g9223
Useful Nautical Web CalculatorGreg Rudzinski25 Jul 2009, 16:466709g9222
Re: Port RoyalHenry Halboth25 Jul 2009, 15:5815684g9221
Re: Port RoyalGreg Rudzinski25 Jul 2009, 14:305757g9220
Port RoyalByron Franklin25 Jul 2009, 02:325242g9219
Re: The BygraveHanno Ix25 Jul 2009, 02:247337g9218
Re: Working a lunar. was: lunar distance in WikipediaPeter Hakel24 Jul 2009, 23:1410356g9217
Re: The BygraveHanno Ix24 Jul 2009, 22:5420265g9216
Re: Working a lunar. was: lunar distance in WikipediaDave Walden24 Jul 2009, 16:1622571g9215
Re: It's Moon-landing MondayBrad Morris24 Jul 2009, 15:599552g9214
Re: The BygraveBrad Morris24 Jul 2009, 15:5321271g9213
Re: The BygraveHanno Ix24 Jul 2009, 15:368899g9212
Re: ebbco sextantIC Payne24 Jul 2009, 07:522654657g9211
Re: Kollsman periscopic pendulous sextantNavList Messages24 Jul 2009, 06:175589g9210
Re: It's Moon-landing MondayFrank Reed24 Jul 2009, 07:177531g9209
Re: The BygraveHein Bodahl24 Jul 2009, 07:09512439g9208
Re: It's Moon-landing MondayFrank Reed24 Jul 2009, 07:016886g9207
Re: It's Moon-landing MondayFrank Reed24 Jul 2009, 06:228274g9206
Re: Working a lunar. was: lunar distance in WikipediaFrank Reed24 Jul 2009, 06:116992g9205
Plotting in TrueLu Abel24 Jul 2009, 03:495600g9204
Re: Working a lunar. was: lunar distance in WikipediaNavList Messages23 Jul 2009, 20:498518g9203
Re: The BygraveDave Walden23 Jul 2009, 23:4123065g9202
Re: The BygraveHanno Ix23 Jul 2009, 23:307600g9201
Re: The BygraveDave Walden23 Jul 2009, 19:0027415g9200
Re: The BygraveAndrew Corl23 Jul 2009, 18:258954g9199
Re: The BygraveHanno Ix23 Jul 2009, 18:177472g9198
Re: Arg 1 Ww 11 U Boat Navigation Device Ebay Item Number: 370193239339Brad Morris23 Jul 2009, 18:076648g9197
Re: Collimation testThomas Kleemann23 Jul 2009, 17:504882g9196
Re: Arg 1 Ww 11 U Boat Navigation Device Ebay Item Number: 370193239339Dave Walden23 Jul 2009, 17:40164247g9195
Re: IFR by the Sun and Stars (from AVWeb)Ronald P Barrett23 Jul 2009, 13:3612147g9194
IFR by the Sun and Stars (from AVWeb)Richard B. Langley23 Jul 2009, 12:336941g9193
Re: ebbco sextantClive Sutherland23 Jul 2009, 11:147402g9192
Re: Almanac accuracyDouglas Denny23 Jul 2009, 10:106090g9191
Re: ebbco sextantIC Payne23 Jul 2009, 09:0510219g9190
Re: Fw: Grounding of cruiser PORT ROYALFrank Reed23 Jul 2009, 03:059692g9189
Re: ebbco sextantKen Gebhart23 Jul 2009, 03:017347g9188
Re: ebbco sextantHewitt Schlereth23 Jul 2009, 02:187285g9187
Re: The BygraveDave Walden23 Jul 2009, 02:15151444g9186
Re: ebbco sextantFrank Reed23 Jul 2009, 01:046747g9185
Re: The BygraveGary LaPook23 Jul 2009, 00:27467199g9184
Ebbco sextantS Selckmann22 Jul 2009, 17:204445g9183
Re: Fw: Grounding of cruiser PORT ROYALLu Abel22 Jul 2009, 20:49376665g9182
50mm DSLR Camera Celestial Exercise SolutionGreg Rudzinski22 Jul 2009, 19:207524g9181
Re: BygravesHewitt Schlereth22 Jul 2009, 15:568687g9180
Re: BygravesBrad Morris22 Jul 2009, 14:318761g9179
Re: BygravesRob M22 Jul 2009, 13:574712g9178
Hughes periscopic sextantDouglas Simpson22 Jul 2009, 07:014816g9177
Re: Fw: Grounding of cruiser PORT ROYALFrank Reed22 Jul 2009, 06:04368932g9176
Re: It's Moon-landing MondayGreg Rudzinski21 Jul 2009, 21:395918g9175
Re: It's Moon-landing MondayLu Abel21 Jul 2009, 18:315808g9174
Re: BygravesHanno Ix21 Jul 2009, 17:1820124g9173
Re: It's Moon-landing MondayGreg Rudzinski21 Jul 2009, 17:096434g9172
Wasting Away in Keuffel & Esser-villeHewitt Schlereth21 Jul 2009, 16:47218133g9171
Re: Collimation testGary LaPook21 Jul 2009, 16:295635g9170
Re: BygravesMartin T21 Jul 2009, 16:248763g9169
Re: It's Moon-landing MondayPeter Hakel21 Jul 2009, 16:1010596g9168
Re: It's Moon-landing MondayBrad Morris21 Jul 2009, 15:537976g9167
Re: It's Moon-landing MondayGreg Rudzinski21 Jul 2009, 14:2910079g9166
Re: It's Moon-landing MondayGreg Rudzinski21 Jul 2009, 14:165550g9165
Re: It's Moon-landing MondayBrad Morris21 Jul 2009, 12:5911507g9164
Re: Collimation testGary LaPook21 Jul 2009, 12:178290g9163
Old Hawaiian DatumFrank Reed21 Jul 2009, 12:137645g9162
Re: It's Moon-landing MondayFrank Reed21 Jul 2009, 08:006464g9161
Re: It's Moon-landing MondayFrank Reed21 Jul 2009, 07:548986g9160
Re: It's Moon-landing MondayFrank Reed21 Jul 2009, 07:366279g9159
Re: Collimation testBill Morris21 Jul 2009, 04:541964096g9158
Re: It's Moon-landing MondayLu Abel21 Jul 2009, 02:366205g9157
Collimation testThomas Kleemann20 Jul 2009, 23:275097g9156
Re: It's Moon-landing MondayBrad Morris20 Jul 2009, 19:1110251g9155
Re: It's Moon-landing MondayGreg Rudzinski20 Jul 2009, 17:027071g9154
Wasting Away in Keuffel & Esser VilleHewitt Schlereth20 Jul 2009, 14:531435232g9153
Re: It's Moon-landing MondayBrad Morris20 Jul 2009, 13:3710524g9152
Re: It's Moon-landing MondayFrank Reed20 Jul 2009, 12:047367g9151
It's Moon-landing MondayFrank Reed20 Jul 2009, 11:358562g9150
Re: Almanac accuracyPaul Hirose19 Jul 2009, 22:467477g9149
Re: "Marine Navigation" by Weems. was: Re: "A history of marine navigation" by Per CollinderGary LaPook19 Jul 2009, 18:156004g9148
Re: BygravesHanno Ix18 Jul 2009, 18:3612257g9147
Re: Almanac accuracy, WAS: Re: HughesTables.Peter Hakel18 Jul 2009, 17:5114838g9146
Re: Almanac accuracy, WAS: Re: HughesTables.Douglas Denny18 Jul 2009, 14:407465g9145
Re: Fw: Grounding of cruiser PORT ROYALFrank Reed18 Jul 2009, 13:25243326g9144
Re: Almanac accuracy, WAS: Re: HughesTables.Frank Reed18 Jul 2009, 03:088833g9143
Re: Almanac accuracy, WAS: Re: HughesTables.Douglas Denny18 Jul 2009, 01:107290g9142
Re: Almanac accuracy, WAS: Re: HughesTables.Douglas Denny18 Jul 2009, 00:4710504g9141
Re: micrometersextants.Wolfgang Köberer17 Jul 2009, 20:466128g9140
Re: Almanac accuracy, WAS: Re: HughesTables.Peter Hakel17 Jul 2009, 20:339913g9139
Re: Fw: Grounding of cruiser PORT ROYALScott Owen17 Jul 2009, 20:228004g9138
Re: micrometer sextants.Brad Morris17 Jul 2009, 19:368203g9137
Re: Almanac accuracy, WAS: Re: HughesTables.Dave Walden17 Jul 2009, 19:335456g9136
Re: micrometersextants.Wolfgang Köberer17 Jul 2009, 19:25340813g9135
Re: micrometer sextants.Wolfgang Köberer17 Jul 2009, 19:207359g9134
Re: "A history of marine navigation" by Per Collinder,and NeckamGeorge Huxtable17 Jul 2009, 17:296809g9133
Almanac accuracy, WAS: Re: HughesTables.Peter Hakel17 Jul 2009, 17:2010083g9132
Re: "A history of marine navigation" by Per Collinder,and NeckamKen Muldrew17 Jul 2009, 15:327119g9131
Re: Fw: Grounding of cruiser PORT ROYALHewitt Schlereth17 Jul 2009, 13:1711499g9130
Re: Fw: Grounding of cruiser PORT ROYALBrad Morris17 Jul 2009, 12:5710492g9129
Re: Hughes Tables.Douglas Denny17 Jul 2009, 09:516527g9128
Re: "A history of marine navigation" by Per Collinder,and NeckamGeorge Huxtable17 Jul 2009, 09:3510165g9127
Re: Hughes Tables.Dave Walden17 Jul 2009, 06:425136g9126
Re: Hughes Tables.Dave Walden17 Jul 2009, 06:3864599g9125
Re: Hughes Tables.Douglas Denny17 Jul 2009, 05:555730g9124
Re: Hughes Tables.Dave Walden17 Jul 2009, 05:335293g9123
Re: Hughes Tables.Douglas Denny17 Jul 2009, 04:058482g9122
Re: Fw: Grounding of cruiser PORT ROYALLu Abel17 Jul 2009, 03:588031g9121
Re: Fw: Grounding of cruiser PORT ROYALLu Abel17 Jul 2009, 03:068036g9120
Re: BygravesBill Morris17 Jul 2009, 02:596474g9119
Re: Lunars: an epitaph and an obituaryFrank Reed17 Jul 2009, 01:488313g9118
Re: BygravesHanno Ix17 Jul 2009, 00:2911710g9117
Re: BygravesGary LaPook16 Jul 2009, 23:458057g9116
Re: BygravesBrad Morris16 Jul 2009, 19:5017384g9115
BygravesHanno Ix16 Jul 2009, 18:097637g9114
50mm DSLR Camera Celestial ExerciseGreg Rudzinski16 Jul 2009, 17:136477g9113
Re: Lunars: an epitaph and an obituaryFred Hebard16 Jul 2009, 13:106881g9112
Re: Fw: Grounding of cruiser PORT ROYALFred Hebard16 Jul 2009, 12:538799g9111
Re: Lunars: an epitaph and an obituaryNavList Messages16 Jul 2009, 09:036620g9110
Re: On lunars generallyGeoffrey Kolbe16 Jul 2009, 07:029647g9109
Re: Testing sextants in 1885Bill Morris16 Jul 2009, 06:415140g9108
Re: Testing sextants in 1885Frank Reed16 Jul 2009, 04:029121g9107
Re: Fw: Grounding of cruiser PORT ROYALHenry Halboth16 Jul 2009, 03:5014810g9106
Re: Testing sextants in 1885Henry Halboth16 Jul 2009, 03:3814700g9105
Re: Testing sextants in 1885Frank Reed16 Jul 2009, 03:315629g9104
Lunars: an epitaph and an obituaryFrank Reed16 Jul 2009, 03:2412706g9103
Re: Testing sextants in 1885Bill Morris16 Jul 2009, 03:045625g9102
Re: Fw: Grounding of cruiser PORT ROYALBill Morris16 Jul 2009, 03:00539180g9101
Re: On lunars generallyFrank Reed16 Jul 2009, 02:407204g9100
Testing sextants in 1885Frank Reed16 Jul 2009, 02:068514g9099
Re: Hughes Tables.Dave Walden16 Jul 2009, 01:417177g9098
Re: Fw: Grounding of cruiser PORT ROYALGeorge Huxtable15 Jul 2009, 20:278728g9097
Re: Fw: Grounding of cruiser PORT ROYALHenry Halboth15 Jul 2009, 19:2012280g9096
Re: Fw: Grounding of cruiser PORT ROYALLu Abel15 Jul 2009, 15:586220g9095
Re: Fw: Grounding of cruiser PORT ROYALGreg Rudzinski15 Jul 2009, 15:374900g9094
Re: Fw: Grounding of cruiser PORT ROYALFrank Reed15 Jul 2009, 04:026252g9093
Re: Fw: Grounding of cruiser PORTROYALHenry Halboth15 Jul 2009, 03:4311240g9092
Re: Fw: Grounding of cruiser PORT ROYALFred Hebard14 Jul 2009, 20:395570g9091
Re: Fw: Grounding of cruiser PORT ROYALBrad Morris14 Jul 2009, 18:098345g9090
Fw: Grounding of cruiser PORT ROYALGeorge Huxtable14 Jul 2009, 17:276048g9089
Re: "Marine Navigation" by Weems. was: Re: "A history of marine navigation" by Per CollinderDouglas Denny13 Jul 2009, 20:40558879g9088
Re: "Marine Navigation" by Weems. was: Re: "A history of marine navigation" by Per CollinderBrad Morris13 Jul 2009, 17:077704g9087
Re: Possible outages: fer3.com maintenanceFrank Reed13 Jul 2009, 03:508012g9086
Hughes Tables.NavList Messages12 Jul 2009, 18:157317g9085
Re: Assumed altitude methodDave Walden12 Jul 2009, 11:476280g9084
Re: Assumed altitude methodPeter Fogg12 Jul 2009, 07:079087g9083
Re: "Marine Navigation" by Weems. was: Re: "A history of marine navigation" by Per CollinderNavList Messages12 Jul 2009, 00:327611g9082
Re: "Marine Navigation" by Weems. was: Re: "A history of marine navigation" by Per CollinderDave Walden12 Jul 2009, 00:31442349g9081
"Marine Navigation" by Weems. was: Re:"A history of marine navigation" by Per CollinderGeorge Huxtable11 Jul 2009, 23:026365g9080
Re: The Noon FixPeter Hakel11 Jul 2009, 17:181850105g9079
Re: "A history of marine navigation" by Per CollinderFrank Reed11 Jul 2009, 11:5010409g9078
Re: "A history of marinenavigation" by Per CollinderWolfgang Köberer11 Jul 2009, 10:286217g9077
Re: "A history of marine navigation" by Per CollinderNicolàs de Hilster11 Jul 2009, 07:135855g9076
Re: "A history of marine navigation" by Per CollinderGeorge Huxtable11 Jul 2009, 06:567857g9075
Re: The Noon FixJames N Wilson11 Jul 2009, 03:29219730g9074
"A history of marine navigation" by Per CollinderDave Walden11 Jul 2009, 01:067127g9073
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Hanno Ix10 Jul 2009, 23:0115273g9072
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Gary LaPook10 Jul 2009, 22:43580500g9071
Re: Assumed altitude methodDave Walden10 Jul 2009, 21:50114078g9070
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Gary LaPook10 Jul 2009, 21:0613771g9069
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Hanno Ix10 Jul 2009, 18:137637g9068
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsNicolàs de Hilster10 Jul 2009, 11:307041g9067
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsBill Morris10 Jul 2009, 10:286895g9066
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsNicolàs de Hilster10 Jul 2009, 08:536548g9065
IC tests and magnificationFrank Reed10 Jul 2009, 07:317395g9064
Re: Starting new threadsFrank Reed10 Jul 2009, 07:068906g9063
Re: Assumed altitude methodFrank Reed10 Jul 2009, 06:535248g9062
Re: On lunars generallyFrank Reed10 Jul 2009, 06:527998g9061
Re: Shipwreck of Admiral ShovellFrank Reed10 Jul 2009, 06:2511875g9060
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsFrank Reed10 Jul 2009, 05:097611g9059
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Richard M Pisko10 Jul 2009, 04:137096g9058
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Gary LaPook10 Jul 2009, 03:5012868g9057
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Gary LaPook10 Jul 2009, 03:24322634g9056
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Gary LaPook10 Jul 2009, 03:0615805g9055
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Bill Morris10 Jul 2009, 02:367359g9054
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Thomas Kleemann9 Jul 2009, 23:237755g9053
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?NavList Messages9 Jul 2009, 20:317654g9052
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Thomas Kleemann9 Jul 2009, 22:507124g9051
Re: Assumed altitude methodDave Walden9 Jul 2009, 22:116314g9050
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Brad Morris9 Jul 2009, 20:049184g9049
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Geoffrey Kolbe9 Jul 2009, 19:328566g9048
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Brad Morris9 Jul 2009, 19:0111551g9047
Re: "Attainment of Precision"article (1964)Wolfgang Köberer9 Jul 2009, 18:599956g9046
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Gary LaPook9 Jul 2009, 18:268232g9045
Re: "Attainment of Precision" article (1964)Andrés Ruiz9 Jul 2009, 14:3312908g9044
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Brad Morris9 Jul 2009, 13:237908g9043
Nautical Almanac Concise MethodDave Walden9 Jul 2009, 13:22234828g9042
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Brad Morris9 Jul 2009, 13:1693255g9041
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Gary LaPook9 Jul 2009, 11:057440g9040
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Bill Morris9 Jul 2009, 05:557358g9039
Possible outages: fer3.com maintenanceFrank Reed9 Jul 2009, 05:045241g9038
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Gary LaPook9 Jul 2009, 03:197495g9037
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Hanno Ix9 Jul 2009, 01:5914105g9036
Celestial navigation graphicFrank Reed8 Jul 2009, 23:356241g9035
Re: "Attainment of Precision" article (1964)Thomas Kleemann8 Jul 2009, 21:587153g9034
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Thomas Kleemann8 Jul 2009, 21:218431g9033
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsGreg Rudzinski8 Jul 2009, 17:056000g9032
Re: Bygrave formula accuracy on 10 inch slide ruleHanno Ix8 Jul 2009, 17:0515970g9031
Re: The BygraveHanno Ix8 Jul 2009, 16:5312459g9030
Re: "Attainment of Precision" article (1964)Gary LaPook8 Jul 2009, 11:3711494g9029
Re: "Attainment of Precision" article (1964)George Huxtable8 Jul 2009, 11:129186g9028
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsBill B8 Jul 2009, 09:576847g9027
Re: "Attainment of Precision" article (1964)Nicolàs de Hilster8 Jul 2009, 09:085604g9026
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsGeorge Huxtable8 Jul 2009, 08:458817g9025
Re: On lunars generallyGeoffrey Kolbe8 Jul 2009, 05:519504g9024
Re: Accuracy of BygraveGary LaPook8 Jul 2009, 05:475615g9023
Shipwreck of Admiral ShovellGary LaPook8 Jul 2009, 05:456621g9022
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsBill Morris8 Jul 2009, 05:287849g9021
The shipwreck of Admiral ShovellGary LaPook8 Jul 2009, 05:246478g9020
Re: Bygrave formula accuracy on 10 inch slide ruleGary LaPook8 Jul 2009, 05:067751g9019
Re: On lunars generallyFrank Reed8 Jul 2009, 04:3915002g9018
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsGreg Rudzinski8 Jul 2009, 03:466916g9017
Re: Starting new threadsJames N Wilson8 Jul 2009, 03:276397g9016
Re: Starting new threadsScott Owen8 Jul 2009, 03:189272g9015
Re: On lunars generallyFrank Reed8 Jul 2009, 03:127638g9014
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsDouglas Denny7 Jul 2009, 08:196056g9013
Re: On lunars generallyDouglas Denny7 Jul 2009, 08:078973g9012
Re: The BygraveGary LaPook8 Jul 2009, 01:5511009g9011
Re: The BygraveHanno Ix8 Jul 2009, 00:018788g9010
Re: On lunars generallyHenry Halboth7 Jul 2009, 17:029005g9009
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Ken Gebhart7 Jul 2009, 13:438742g9008
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Brad Morris7 Jul 2009, 13:1611505g9007
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Brad Morris7 Jul 2009, 13:148618g9006
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsBill Morris7 Jul 2009, 10:288393g9005
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsDouglas Denny7 Jul 2009, 07:316933g9004
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsGeorge Huxtable7 Jul 2009, 07:576646g9003
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsBill B7 Jul 2009, 06:5410070g9002
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsFrank Reed7 Jul 2009, 06:397422g9001
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsBill Morris7 Jul 2009, 05:518408g9000
Re: On lunars generallyGeoffrey Kolbe7 Jul 2009, 05:217147g8999
Re: The BygraveGary LaPook7 Jul 2009, 05:286226g8998
Re: Starting new threadsGary LaPook7 Jul 2009, 04:3610734g8997
Re: The shipwreck of Admiral ShovellFrank Reed7 Jul 2009, 03:597098g8996
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsFrank Reed7 Jul 2009, 03:378447g8995
Re: "Attainment of Precision" article (1964)Frank Reed7 Jul 2009, 03:267943g8994
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsFrank Reed7 Jul 2009, 03:197386g8993
Re: The BygraveFrank Reed7 Jul 2009, 03:106778g8992
On lunars generallyFrank Reed7 Jul 2009, 02:5018655g8991
Re: Accuracy of BygraveKen Gebhart7 Jul 2009, 02:506302g8990
Re: Starting new threadsJames N Wilson7 Jul 2009, 01:086234g8989
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorFrank Reed7 Jul 2009, 01:187014g8988
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsDouglas Denny6 Jul 2009, 20:4210887g8987
Re: "Attainment of Precision" article (1964)Douglas Denny6 Jul 2009, 22:318240g8986
Bygrave formula accuracy on 10 inch slide rulePaul Hirose6 Jul 2009, 22:198321g8985
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsBill Morris6 Jul 2009, 22:088963g8984
Re: Accuracy of BygraveGary LaPook6 Jul 2009, 19:285246g8983
Re: Starting new threadsScott Owen6 Jul 2009, 19:098208g8982
Re: Accuracy of BygraveGary LaPook6 Jul 2009, 18:015695g8981
Flight navigation reference worksGary LaPook6 Jul 2009, 17:567144g8980
Re: The shipwreck of Admiral ShovellGeoffrey Butt6 Jul 2009, 17:567465g8979
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorBill B6 Jul 2009, 09:517322g8978
Re: Accuracy of BygraveGeorge Huxtable6 Jul 2009, 08:596678g8977
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Bill B6 Jul 2009, 08:557868g8976
Re: Accuracy of BygraveGary LaPook6 Jul 2009, 07:05324679g8975
Re: Accuracy of BygraveGary LaPook6 Jul 2009, 06:24107043g8974
Accuracy of BygraveGary LaPook6 Jul 2009, 05:491691365g8973
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Gary LaPook6 Jul 2009, 05:3420811g8972
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsGreg Rudzinski6 Jul 2009, 03:535731g8971
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Hanno Ix6 Jul 2009, 03:46292240g8970
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsDouglas Denny5 Jul 2009, 22:315881g8969
Re: "Attainment of Precision" article (1964)James N Wilson6 Jul 2009, 01:236511g8968
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsDouglas Denny5 Jul 2009, 20:0714174g8967
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsDouglas Denny5 Jul 2009, 11:108508g8966
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsGreg Rudzinski5 Jul 2009, 19:5711216g8965
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsGreg Rudzinski5 Jul 2009, 14:3510019g8964
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Gary LaPook5 Jul 2009, 14:2818044g8963
Re: The BygraveGary LaPook5 Jul 2009, 14:008917g8962
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsGeorge Huxtable5 Jul 2009, 10:199094g8961
Re: The BygraveDouglas Denny5 Jul 2009, 02:01322147g8960
Re: Starting new threadsGary LaPook5 Jul 2009, 02:036220g8959
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorFrank Reed5 Jul 2009, 01:276419g8958
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsFrank Reed5 Jul 2009, 01:099144g8957
Appy Day is here againFrank Reed5 Jul 2009, 00:076634g8956
Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsGreg Rudzinski4 Jul 2009, 23:478245g8955
"Vernier acuity" of horizon IC testsFrank Reed4 Jul 2009, 21:448127g8954
Re: Dollar Store Sextant ImprovedPeter Fogg4 Jul 2009, 21:387160g8953
Dollar Store Sextant ImprovedGreg Rudzinski4 Jul 2009, 21:351106417g8952
Re: "Attainment of Precision" article (1964)Frank Reed4 Jul 2009, 21:196414g8951
Re: Starting new threadsFrank Reed4 Jul 2009, 21:055332g8950
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Gary LaPook4 Jul 2009, 20:59288616g8949
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Ken Gebhart4 Jul 2009, 18:507288g8948
Re: "Attainment of Precision" article (1964)George Huxtable4 Jul 2009, 16:238521g8947
Re starting new threadsPaul Brewer4 Jul 2009, 11:475996g8946
Re: Starting new threadsBill B4 Jul 2009, 08:347161g8945
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorPaul Hirose4 Jul 2009, 07:056983g8944
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorFrank Reed4 Jul 2009, 03:427676g8943
"Attainment of Precision" article (1964)Frank Reed4 Jul 2009, 03:3017703g8942
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorHenry Halboth4 Jul 2009, 03:1915551g8941
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Peter Fogg4 Jul 2009, 01:338675g8940
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Douglas Denny3 Jul 2009, 08:117619g8939
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorDouglas Denny3 Jul 2009, 07:5812508g8938
Re: Starting new threadsFrank Reed4 Jul 2009, 01:077620g8937
Re: Starting new threadsFrank Reed4 Jul 2009, 00:587241g8936
Re: Eyesight dangers using telescopesFrank Reed4 Jul 2009, 00:497353g8935
Re: The BygraveFrank Reed4 Jul 2009, 00:418272g8934
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorFrank Reed4 Jul 2009, 00:227849g8933
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Frank Reed3 Jul 2009, 23:498174g8932
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorBill Morris3 Jul 2009, 20:367486g8931
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Gary LaPook3 Jul 2009, 20:32317817g8930
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Gary LaPook3 Jul 2009, 20:29279281g8929
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Gary LaPook3 Jul 2009, 20:0211094g8928
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Tom Sult3 Jul 2009, 18:4513938g8927
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Hanno Ix3 Jul 2009, 18:2013898g8926
Assumed altitude methodDave Walden3 Jul 2009, 17:596000g8925
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Greg Rudzinski3 Jul 2009, 16:406000g8924
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Tom Sult3 Jul 2009, 15:127038g8923
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Bill Morris3 Jul 2009, 07:187375g8922
Hughes Vs. Bendix Patent court case.Douglas Denny2 Jul 2009, 22:388230g8921
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorFrank Reed3 Jul 2009, 03:4410294g8920
Re: Dollar Store SextantPaul Jackson3 Jul 2009, 01:1010023g8919
Dollar Store SextantGreg Rudzinski3 Jul 2009, 00:53539383g8918
Periscopic Sextant. Henry Hughes and SonDouglas Denny2 Jul 2009, 23:076844g8917
Re: The BygraveTom Sult2 Jul 2009, 13:436343g8916
Re: The BygraveDouglas Denny2 Jul 2009, 08:225701g8915
Re: The BygraveFrank Reed2 Jul 2009, 10:485527g8914
Re: The BygraveDouglas Denny1 Jul 2009, 21:417303g8913
Re: Magnifiers for K&E slide rulesHewitt Schlereth1 Jul 2009, 17:037257g8912
Re: Magnifiers for K&E slide rulesGreg Rudzinski1 Jul 2009, 16:354968g8911
Re: Magnifiers for K&E slide rulesHewitt Schlereth1 Jul 2009, 15:507296g8910
Re: Magnifiers for K&E slide rulesGary LaPook1 Jul 2009, 15:475185g8909
Magnifiers for K&E slide rulesHewitt Schlereth1 Jul 2009, 11:556087g8908
Re: Starting new threadsGeorge Huxtable1 Jul 2009, 10:247357g8907
Re: Starting new threadsM v Noorden1 Jul 2009, 06:526382g8906
Re: Starting new threadsFrank Reed1 Jul 2009, 05:0611538g8905
Re: Eyesight dangers using telescopesKen Gebhart1 Jul 2009, 03:075635g8904
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorFrank Reed1 Jul 2009, 02:587302g8903
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetFrank Reed1 Jul 2009, 02:518784g8902
Re: Eyesight dangers using telescopesPaul Hirose30 Jun 2009, 22:0310470g8901
Starting new threadsGary LaPook30 Jun 2009, 18:565328g8900
Re: The BygraveHanno Ix30 Jun 2009, 18:369935g8899
Re: The BygraveHanno Ix30 Jun 2009, 18:3118517g8898
Re: Eyesight dangers using telescopesAndrés Ruiz30 Jun 2009, 16:487301g8897
Re: Eyesight dangers using telescopesHenry Halboth30 Jun 2009, 15:4516014g8896
Re: Eyesight dangers using telescopesGeoffrey Kolbe30 Jun 2009, 14:587606g8895
Re: Eyesight dangers using telescopesGeorge Huxtable30 Jun 2009, 11:438012g8894
Re: The BygraveRonald van Riet30 Jun 2009, 09:449096g8893
Re: Eyesight dangers using telescopesDouglas Denny30 Jun 2009, 09:197193g8892
Re: Eyesight dangers using telescopesDouglas Denny30 Jun 2009, 08:547258g8891
Re: Eyesight dangers using telescopesGreg Rudzinski30 Jun 2009, 07:1010120g8890
Re: Eyesight dangers using telescopesBill Morris30 Jun 2009, 07:066538g8889
Re: Eyesight dangers using telescopesGeoffrey Kolbe30 Jun 2009, 06:3917538g8888
Re: Eyesight dangers using telescopesFrank Reed30 Jun 2009, 05:428850g8887
Re: The BygraveBill B30 Jun 2009, 05:215969g8886
Re: Eyesight dangers using telescopesPeter Fogg30 Jun 2009, 03:0810002g8885
Re: Eyesight dangers using telescopesKen Gebhart30 Jun 2009, 02:5513788g8884
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITJames N Wilson30 Jun 2009, 02:269060g8883
Re: The BygraveWolfgang Köberer29 Jun 2009, 19:036634g8882
Re: The BygraveDouglas Denny29 Jun 2009, 18:218398g8881
The BygraveBrad Morris29 Jun 2009, 18:009395g8880
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorGary LaPook29 Jun 2009, 17:418570g8879
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorGary LaPook29 Jun 2009, 17:186964g8878
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorDouglas Denny29 Jun 2009, 16:118074g8877
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorDouglas Denny29 Jun 2009, 15:358444g8876
Re: Eyesight dangers using telescopesDouglas Denny29 Jun 2009, 15:1112647g8875
Re: Formulas to Compute LHAGary LaPook29 Jun 2009, 09:5316474g8874
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorBrad Morris29 Jun 2009, 09:208230g8873
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetBill B29 Jun 2009, 06:046784g8872
Re: Formulas to Compute LHABill B29 Jun 2009, 05:346521g8871
Re: Formulas to Compute LHAJames N Wilson29 Jun 2009, 02:47428623g8870
Re: Formulas to Compute LHAGreg Rudzinski28 Jun 2009, 23:3810965g8869
Re: Formulas to Compute LHAKen Gebhart28 Jun 2009, 23:1611599g8868
Re: Eyesight dangers using telescopesGeorge Huxtable28 Jun 2009, 10:3910311g8867
Re: Formulas to Compute LHALu Abel28 Jun 2009, 16:15142597g8866
Re: Formulas to Compute LHALu Abel28 Jun 2009, 16:046635g8865
Re: Formulas to Compute LHAWill Ross28 Jun 2009, 15:1321134g8864
Re: Formulas to Compute LHAWill Ross28 Jun 2009, 15:0619591g8863
Re: Formulas to Compute LHAWill Ross28 Jun 2009, 14:5819398g8862
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetChristian Scheele28 Jun 2009, 14:418058g8861
Re: Formulas to Compute LHADave Walden28 Jun 2009, 11:496310g8860
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorBill B28 Jun 2009, 09:148935g8859
Re: Formulas to Compute LHAGary LaPook28 Jun 2009, 08:315714g8858
Re: Formulas to Compute LHABill B28 Jun 2009, 07:53138007g8857
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorGeorge Huxtable28 Jun 2009, 07:526569g8856
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorBill B28 Jun 2009, 06:489264g8855
Re: Formulas to Compute LHAGary LaPook28 Jun 2009, 05:5610454g8854
Re: Formulas to Compute LHAGreg Rudzinski28 Jun 2009, 01:389315g8853
Re: Formulas to Compute LHAAndrew Corl28 Jun 2009, 00:2717574g8852
"THE ATTAINMENT OF PRECISION IN CELESTIAL NAVIGATIONby Robert Gordon. Journal of the Institute of Navigation. 1964.Douglas Denny27 Jun 2009, 23:3012279g8851
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorDouglas Denny27 Jun 2009, 22:1319248g8850
Re: Formulas to Compute LHAWill Ross27 Jun 2009, 15:008991g8849
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetBill B27 Jun 2009, 20:227342g8848
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorTom Sult27 Jun 2009, 16:487054g8847
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetMarcel Tschudin27 Jun 2009, 12:489425g8846
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorGary LaPook27 Jun 2009, 11:215130g8845
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetBill B27 Jun 2009, 06:497911g8844
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorBill B27 Jun 2009, 05:367360g8843
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorFrank Reed27 Jun 2009, 04:167103g8842
Re: Navlist coutesy Re: was: Star-stardistances for arc errorGreg R_27 Jun 2009, 04:107143g8841
Re: Navlist coutesy Re: was: Star-stardistances for arc errorFrank Reed27 Jun 2009, 04:085388g8840
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorFrank Reed27 Jun 2009, 04:059437g8839
Re: Celestial Flight Navigators ; AFNOAFrank Reed27 Jun 2009, 03:277147g8838
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorFrank Reed27 Jun 2009, 03:237189g8837
Re: Eyesight dangers using telescopesFrank Reed27 Jun 2009, 03:148804g8836
Re: Navlist coutesy Re: was: Star-stardistances for arc errorFrank Reed27 Jun 2009, 03:007265g8835
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorFrank Reed27 Jun 2009, 02:346730g8834
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorFrank Reed27 Jun 2009, 02:317505g8833
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorFrank Reed27 Jun 2009, 02:1610069g8832
Re: Eyesight dangers using telescopesJames N Wilson27 Jun 2009, 01:526511g8831
Re: Eyesight dangers using telescopesFrank Reed27 Jun 2009, 01:387759g8830
Re: PolarisPeter Hakel27 Jun 2009, 00:527976g8829
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorJames N Wilson27 Jun 2009, 00:425500g8828
Re: PolarisFrank Reed27 Jun 2009, 00:375259g8827
BetelgeusePeter Hakel26 Jun 2009, 22:277582g8826
Re: PolarisPeter Hakel26 Jun 2009, 22:1055861g8825
Re: PyroheliometerThomas Kleemann26 Jun 2009, 21:526493g8824
Re: Cell for a SailorGreg Rudzinski26 Jun 2009, 21:375497g8823
Re: Navlist coutesy Re: was: Star-star distances for arc errorWolfgang Köberer26 Jun 2009, 21:376605g8822
Re: Navlist coutesy Re: was: Star-star distances for arc errorWolfgang Köberer26 Jun 2009, 21:356570g8821
Re: Cell for a SailorGreg Rudzinski26 Jun 2009, 21:095765g8820
Re: Navlist coutesy Re: was: Star-stardistances for arc errorGreg R_26 Jun 2009, 21:0610757g8819
Re: Cell for a SailorTim McAnulty26 Jun 2009, 20:557674g8818
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorGeorge Huxtable26 Jun 2009, 20:2710181g8817
Re: Variants of the BrisJames N Wilson26 Jun 2009, 19:31740419g8816
Celestial Flight Navigators ; AFNOANavList Messages26 Jun 2009, 13:576533g8815
Re: MA-1 bubble sextantNavList Messages26 Jun 2009, 13:406565g8814
Re: Eyesight dangers using telescopesPeter Fogg26 Jun 2009, 17:237025g8813
Re: Variants of the BrisGreg Rudzinski26 Jun 2009, 15:376598g8812
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorGeorge Huxtable26 Jun 2009, 13:307962g8811
Re: Eyesight dangers using telescopesBill B26 Jun 2009, 10:589529g8810
Navlist coutesy Re: was: Star-stardistances for arc errorGeorge Huxtable26 Jun 2009, 09:268667g8809
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorBill B26 Jun 2009, 09:177831g8808
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorGary LaPook26 Jun 2009, 08:436442g8807
Re: Variants of the BrisAndrés Ruiz26 Jun 2009, 08:3917428g8806
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorBill Morris26 Jun 2009, 07:5310444g8805
Ball Recording SextantPaul Brewer26 Jun 2009, 07:536171g8804
Re: Eyesight dangers using telescopesBill Morris26 Jun 2009, 06:527672g8803
Re: Variants of the BrisFrank Reed26 Jun 2009, 05:256531g8802
Re: Eyesight dangers using telescopesFrank Reed26 Jun 2009, 05:229124g8801
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorFrank Reed26 Jun 2009, 04:548007g8800
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorFrank Reed26 Jun 2009, 04:187052g8799
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorFrank Reed26 Jun 2009, 04:1518495g8798
Re: Variants of the BrisGreg Rudzinski26 Jun 2009, 04:055459g8797
Re: Variants of the BrisFrank Reed26 Jun 2009, 03:136524g8796
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorFrank Reed26 Jun 2009, 03:106972g8795
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorFrank Reed26 Jun 2009, 03:0414500g8794
Re: Ball Recording Sextant Mark 1 Mod. 0NavList Messages25 Jun 2009, 23:056696g8793
Eyesight dangers using telescopesGeorge Huxtable25 Jun 2009, 23:381023681g8792
Re: Eyesight dangers using telescopes was: [8760]Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetDouglas Denny25 Jun 2009, 20:166716g8791
Re: Eyesight dangers using telescopes was: [8760]Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetDouglas Denny25 Jun 2009, 19:4710003g8790
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorGeorge Huxtable25 Jun 2009, 09:07496364g8789
Re: HO 211 (Ageton) accuracy testWolfgang Köberer25 Jun 2009, 05:306110g8788
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorHenry Halboth25 Jun 2009, 04:0623067g8787
HO 211 (Ageton) accuracy testPaul Hirose25 Jun 2009, 02:467423g8786
Re: PolarisFrank Reed25 Jun 2009, 02:088661g8785
Cell for a SailorGreg Rudzinski24 Jun 2009, 23:091641637g8784
Re: PyroheliometerAndrew Corl24 Jun 2009, 18:4311618g8783
PyroheliometerPeter Smith24 Jun 2009, 18:188408g8782
Re: Variants of the BrisGreg Rudzinski24 Jun 2009, 16:455452g8781
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorGeorge Huxtable24 Jun 2009, 15:4411274g8780
Re: Formulas to Compute LHAGary LaPook24 Jun 2009, 12:0710941g8779
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorBill B24 Jun 2009, 09:377558g8778
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorBill B24 Jun 2009, 08:568386g8777
Eyesight dangers using telescopes was: [8760] Basicsof computing sunrise/sunsetGeorge Huxtable23 Jun 2009, 23:5910278g8776
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorDouglas Denny23 Jun 2009, 21:4538994g8775
PolarisPeter Hakel23 Jun 2009, 19:3412626g8774
Re: Formulas to Compute LHAGary LaPook23 Jun 2009, 19:3210124g8773
Formulas to Compute LHAAndrew Corl23 Jun 2009, 16:257939g8772
Aquino spreadsheetDave Walden23 Jun 2009, 15:38180134g8771
Aquino's MethodDave Walden23 Jun 2009, 15:27292805g8770
Variants of the BrisGreg Rudzinski23 Jun 2009, 15:15304008g8769
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorGeorge Huxtable23 Jun 2009, 13:0211767g8768
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorDouglas Denny23 Jun 2009, 09:5715898g8767
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetFrank Reed23 Jun 2009, 05:128116g8766
Re: Noon in ancient RomeFrank Reed23 Jun 2009, 03:286683g8765
Re: Noon in ancient RomeFrank Reed23 Jun 2009, 03:258136g8764
Re: Refraction correctionFrank Reed23 Jun 2009, 02:477554g8763
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetFrank Reed23 Jun 2009, 02:216125g8762
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorFrank Reed23 Jun 2009, 02:1211007g8761
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetDouglas Denny22 Jun 2009, 20:1411966g8760
Celebrating the solstice: a house built in 1835 to letthe light inPeter Fogg22 Jun 2009, 03:296314g8759
Re: Noon in ancient RomeJohn H21 Jun 2009, 16:068424g8758
Re: Noon in ancient RomeRobert Eno21 Jun 2009, 15:4222623g8757
Re: Noon in ancient RomeRobert Eno21 Jun 2009, 15:3520879g8756
Re: Noon in ancient RomeJohn H21 Jun 2009, 13:367813g8755
Re: Noon in ancient RomePeter Fogg21 Jun 2009, 02:1517504g8754
The archives for NavListFrank Reed21 Jun 2009, 00:167722g8753
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorPaul Hirose20 Jun 2009, 18:547451g8752
Re: Refraction correctionMarcel Tschudin20 Jun 2009, 17:0810811g8751
Re: Refraction correctionPeter Hakel20 Jun 2009, 15:149285g8750
Re: Looking at the SunHewitt Schlereth20 Jun 2009, 15:067446g8749
Refraction correctionPeter Hakel20 Jun 2009, 13:5912322g8748
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetChristian Scheele20 Jun 2009, 12:136644g8747
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorDouglas Denny20 Jun 2009, 11:138233g8746
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorFrank Reed20 Jun 2009, 06:076939g8745
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorPeter Hakel20 Jun 2009, 05:229927g8744
Re: Looking at the SunKen Muldrew20 Jun 2009, 04:3110534g8743
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualGary LaPook20 Jun 2009, 04:3020358g8742
Looking at the SunFrank Reed20 Jun 2009, 04:107287g8741
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetFrank Reed20 Jun 2009, 03:536589g8740
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetFrank Reed20 Jun 2009, 03:275815g8739
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorFrank Reed20 Jun 2009, 03:036626g8738
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetJames N Wilson20 Jun 2009, 02:467460g8737
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorFrank Reed20 Jun 2009, 02:3811389g8736
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorPeter Hakel20 Jun 2009, 02:3111653g8735
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetPaul Hirose20 Jun 2009, 02:107611g8734
Re: slide rule sight reduction accuracyPaul Hirose20 Jun 2009, 02:077353g8733
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetFrank Reed20 Jun 2009, 00:169644g8732
Re: slide rule sight reduction accuracyGary LaPook19 Jun 2009, 23:2512731g8731
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetThomas Kleemann19 Jun 2009, 21:176911g8730
Re: slide rule sight reduction accuracyGary LaPook19 Jun 2009, 20:3211512g8729
Re: Noon in ancient RomePeter Fogg19 Jun 2009, 20:2014897g8728
Re: Noon in ancient RomePeter Hakel19 Jun 2009, 19:4414539g8727
Re: Noon in ancient RomeBrad Morris19 Jun 2009, 18:2917171g8726
Noon in ancient RomePeter Hakel19 Jun 2009, 18:269328g8725
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetChristian Scheele19 Jun 2009, 18:146533g8724
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetChristian Scheele19 Jun 2009, 17:185950g8723
Re: slide rule sight reduction accuracyBrad Morris19 Jun 2009, 12:5310242g8722
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetMarcel Tschudin19 Jun 2009, 12:359234g8721
Re: slide rule sight reduction accuracyGary LaPook19 Jun 2009, 11:056622g8720
Re: slide rule sight reduction accuracyGary LaPook19 Jun 2009, 10:50411948g8719
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualGary LaPook19 Jun 2009, 10:356184g8718
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetHein Bodahl19 Jun 2009, 08:477397g8717
Re: Butterfly Bris PrototypeAndrés Ruiz19 Jun 2009, 09:1841997g8716
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetDouglas Denny19 Jun 2009, 09:176279g8715
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetDouglas Denny19 Jun 2009, 09:075833g8714
Re: Star-star distances for arc errorDouglas Denny19 Jun 2009, 08:575785g8713
Star-star distances for arc errorFrank Reed19 Jun 2009, 05:218281g8712
Re: Butterfly Bris PrototypeFrank Reed19 Jun 2009, 04:078411g8711
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetJames N Wilson19 Jun 2009, 03:415336g8710
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetFrank Reed19 Jun 2009, 03:488038g8709
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetJames N Wilson19 Jun 2009, 03:375958g8708
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetFrank Reed19 Jun 2009, 03:216280g8707
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetFrank Reed19 Jun 2009, 03:118921g8706
Re: Butterfly Bris PrototypeGreg Rudzinski18 Jun 2009, 22:085773g8705
Re: Butterfly Bris PrototypeHewitt Schlereth18 Jun 2009, 21:046280g8704
Butterfly Bris PrototypeGreg Rudzinski18 Jun 2009, 20:23571416g8703
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetDouglas Denny18 Jun 2009, 18:277308g8702
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetDouglas Denny18 Jun 2009, 18:2213533g8701
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetDouglas Denny18 Jun 2009, 18:148352g8700
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetChristian Scheele18 Jun 2009, 18:098084g8699
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetBrad Morris18 Jun 2009, 17:498412g8698
Visual BygraveBrad Morris18 Jun 2009, 17:245872g8697
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetDouglas Denny18 Jun 2009, 14:388281g8696
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetDouglas Denny18 Jun 2009, 14:3313579g8695
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetBill B18 Jun 2009, 12:5310494g8694
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetBrad Morris18 Jun 2009, 12:3614374g8693
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetChristian Scheele18 Jun 2009, 10:4910588g8692
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetChristian Scheele18 Jun 2009, 10:255696g8691
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetChristian Scheele18 Jun 2009, 10:196955g8690
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetAndrés Ruiz18 Jun 2009, 10:1518721g8689
Re: slide rule sight reduction accuracyGary LaPook18 Jun 2009, 10:07182807g8688
Re: slide rule sight reduction accuracyGary LaPook18 Jun 2009, 10:048954g8687
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetBill B18 Jun 2009, 09:329789g8686
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetAndrés Ruiz18 Jun 2009, 07:166493g8685
Re: GPS Maybe Not as Healthy as ThoughtScott Owen18 Jun 2009, 03:3911220g8684
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetGreg Rudzinski17 Jun 2009, 23:416102g8683
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetJames N Wilson17 Jun 2009, 22:187489g8682
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetChristian Scheele17 Jun 2009, 22:1516438g8681
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetChristian Scheele17 Jun 2009, 21:4615680g8680
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetJohn H17 Jun 2009, 21:3914142g8679
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetChristian Scheele17 Jun 2009, 21:358585g8678
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetChristian Scheele17 Jun 2009, 21:0710498g8677
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetBrad Morris17 Jun 2009, 20:588414g8676
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetChristian Scheele17 Jun 2009, 20:576642g8675
Re: Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetJohn H17 Jun 2009, 20:518850g8674
Basics of computing sunrise/sunsetChristian Scheele17 Jun 2009, 20:416369g8673
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Gary LaPook17 Jun 2009, 18:338176g8672
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualGary LaPook17 Jun 2009, 18:2415495g8671
Re: slide rule sight reduction accuracyPaul Hirose17 Jun 2009, 17:356354g8670
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Brad Morris17 Jun 2009, 14:289447g8669
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualGreg Rudzinski17 Jun 2009, 12:5515263g8668
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualHewitt Schlereth17 Jun 2009, 12:277467g8667
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualGary LaPook17 Jun 2009, 12:1615191g8666
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualGary LaPook17 Jun 2009, 12:095358g8665
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualGary LaPook17 Jun 2009, 11:5817989g8664
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Gary LaPook17 Jun 2009, 00:156309g8663
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Gary LaPook17 Jun 2009, 00:136316g8662
Re: slide rule sight reduction accuracyGary LaPook17 Jun 2009, 00:0910488g8661
Re: slide rule sight reduction accuracyGary LaPook16 Jun 2009, 23:327270g8660
Re: slide rule sight reduction accuracyGreg Rudzinski16 Jun 2009, 23:026418g8659
Re: slide rule sight reduction accuracyPaul Hirose16 Jun 2009, 22:356972g8658
Re: slide rule sight reduction accuracyGreg Rudzinski16 Jun 2009, 16:078557g8657
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualHewitt Schlereth16 Jun 2009, 14:106957g8656
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualChristian Scheele16 Jun 2009, 13:124890g8655
Slide rule sight reduction accuracyPaul Hirose16 Jun 2009, 04:078789g8654
Re: Yoder SextantHewitt Schlereth16 Jun 2009, 00:098685g8653
Re: Yoder SextantKen Gebhart15 Jun 2009, 23:116604g8652
Canada Post Stamp to Feature a SextantRichard B. Langley15 Jun 2009, 18:496212g8651
Visual Bygrave, using cosine and tangentBrad Morris15 Jun 2009, 14:496554g8650
The Visual BygraveBrad Morris15 Jun 2009, 06:407662g8649
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualGreg Rudzinski14 Jun 2009, 21:3310994g8648
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualGary LaPook14 Jun 2009, 20:5610173g8647
Re: Fairchild A10 bubble sextant.Jean-Philippe Planas13 Jun 2009, 16:5815176g8646
Re: Trombone Kamal EvolvesGreg Rudzinski13 Jun 2009, 16:457495g8645
Fairchild A10 bubble sextant.Douglas Denny13 Jun 2009, 16:178463g8644
Re: Trombone Kamal EvolvesGreg Rudzinski13 Jun 2009, 15:486908g8643
Re: Hello! Is there anybody out there still working onthe Silicon Sea Problem Legs?Mike Burkes12 Jun 2009, 19:478868g8642
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualChristian Scheele12 Jun 2009, 17:175895g8641
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualGary LaPook12 Jun 2009, 16:4210449g8640
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualChristian Scheele12 Jun 2009, 15:177630g8639
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualChristian Scheele12 Jun 2009, 10:5211026g8638
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualChristian Scheele12 Jun 2009, 10:287610g8637
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualDouglas Denny12 Jun 2009, 08:375791g8636
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualGary LaPook12 Jun 2009, 08:1411226g8635
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualDouglas Denny12 Jun 2009, 08:027164g8634
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualDouglas Denny12 Jun 2009, 07:528507g8633
Re: We may be due to go out with a bangJames N Wilson11 Jun 2009, 23:235373g8632
Re: We may be due to go out with a bangRobert Eno11 Jun 2009, 23:0910480g8631
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualChristian Scheele11 Jun 2009, 20:1714004g8630
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualChristian Scheele11 Jun 2009, 20:079072g8629
Re: We may be due to go out with a bangPeter Fogg11 Jun 2009, 20:038374g8628
Yoder SextantHewitt Schlereth11 Jun 2009, 17:11102836g8627
Re: We may be due to go out with a bangMarcel Tschudin11 Jun 2009, 16:176681g8626
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualGary LaPook11 Jun 2009, 16:12703150g8625
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualGary LaPook11 Jun 2009, 15:218691g8624
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualGary LaPook11 Jun 2009, 15:13742044g8623
Re: We may be due to go out with a bangHewitt Schlereth11 Jun 2009, 14:127936g8622
Re: We may be due to go out with a bangBrad Morris11 Jun 2009, 13:577211g8621
Re: Tratado de Navegacion - Mendoza y Rios. 1787Gary LaPook11 Jun 2009, 13:367884g8620
Re: We may be due to go out with a bangHewitt Schlereth11 Jun 2009, 13:189860g8619
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualChristian Scheele11 Jun 2009, 12:1010341g8618
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualDouglas Denny11 Jun 2009, 11:561206567g8617
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualBill Morris11 Jun 2009, 10:4365563g8616
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualDouglas Denny11 Jun 2009, 10:177576g8615
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualGeoffrey Kolbe11 Jun 2009, 05:506975g8614
We may be due to go out with a bangPeter Fogg11 Jun 2009, 04:1613265g8613
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualGary LaPook11 Jun 2009, 02:0110184g8612
Re: Tratado de Navegacion - Mendoza y Rios. 1787Frank Reed11 Jun 2009, 00:307104g8611
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualChristian Scheele11 Jun 2009, 00:1910715g8610
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualDouglas Denny10 Jun 2009, 23:12761050g8609
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualDouglas Denny10 Jun 2009, 18:219664g8608
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualGary LaPook10 Jun 2009, 16:298749g8607
Re: Hughes Bubble sextant Mk IXAHewitt Schlereth10 Jun 2009, 15:387445g8606
Re: Hughes Bubble sextant Mk IXAHewitt Schlereth10 Jun 2009, 15:076925g8605
Re: Hughes Bubble sextant Mk IXAHewitt Schlereth10 Jun 2009, 14:587754g8604
Re: Tratado de Navegacion - Mendoza y Rios. 1787Andrés Ruiz10 Jun 2009, 12:297588g8603
Re: Hughes Bubble sextant Mk IXAJean-Philippe Planas10 Jun 2009, 05:568560g8602
Re: Hughes Bubble sextant Mk IXAJean-Philippe Planas10 Jun 2009, 05:499266g8601
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualGary LaPook10 Jun 2009, 04:5812861g8600
Re: Hughes Bubble sextant Mk IXABill Morris10 Jun 2009, 02:446974g8599
Hughes Bubble sextant Mk IXAHewitt Schlereth9 Jun 2009, 22:395760g8598
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualDouglas Denny9 Jun 2009, 21:3710716g8597
Re: Hello! Is there anybody out there still working onthe Silicon Sea Problem Legs?Peter Smith9 Jun 2009, 20:456929g8596
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualBill Morris9 Jun 2009, 20:366502g8595
Hello! Is there anybody out there still working on theSilicon Sea Problem Legs?WJ Lubitz9 Jun 2009, 17:1815974g8594
Meridian passageAndrés Ruiz9 Jun 2009, 10:21390708g8593
Broadsheet on Longitude: 1714Frank Reed9 Jun 2009, 05:169637g8592
Re: A-10 Sextant ManualDouglas Denny8 Jun 2009, 23:355662g8591
Re: Viking sun compass artifact and Viking sun stones.Douglas Denny8 Jun 2009, 23:276956g8590
Re: Bubble sextants on e-bayDouglas Denny8 Jun 2009, 22:258439g8589
A-10 Sextant ManualGary LaPook8 Jun 2009, 21:504332g8588
Re: Bubble sextants on e-bayGary LaPook8 Jun 2009, 21:32142558g8587
Re: Polynesian navigationJohn H8 Jun 2009, 14:2614679g8586
Re: Viking sun compass artifact and Viking sun stones.Hewitt Schlereth8 Jun 2009, 14:136307g8585
Re: Viking sun compass artifact andViking sun stones.Hein Bodahl8 Jun 2009, 11:577308g8584
Round-off in lunarsPeter Hakel8 Jun 2009, 04:188817g8583
Re: Polynesian navigationFrank Reed8 Jun 2009, 02:499593g8582
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITJames N Wilson8 Jun 2009, 01:1910242g8581
Re: Almanac dataPeter Hakel7 Jun 2009, 23:0310243g8580
Re: Bubble sextants on e-bayGary LaPook7 Jun 2009, 19:12477470g8579
Re: Bubble sextants on e-bayJean-Philippe Planas7 Jun 2009, 18:3610076g8578
Re: Bubble sextants on e-bayJean-Philippe Planas7 Jun 2009, 18:3218584g8577
Re: Viking sun compass artifact and Viking sun stones.Douglas Denny7 Jun 2009, 18:276501g8576
Re: Bubble sextants on e-bayJean-Philippe Planas7 Jun 2009, 18:2216647g8575
Re: Bubble sextants on e-bayDouglas Denny7 Jun 2009, 18:105846g8574
Re: Bubble sextants on e-bayGary LaPook7 Jun 2009, 18:108923g8573
Re: Viking sun compass artifact andViking sun stones.Hewitt Schlereth7 Jun 2009, 18:077650g8572
Trombone Kamal EvolvesGreg Rudzinski7 Jun 2009, 17:41296812g8571
Re: Viking sun compass artifact andViking sun stones.Wolfgang Köberer7 Jun 2009, 16:236848g8570
Re: Bubble sextants on e-bayRobert Eno7 Jun 2009, 14:536976g8569
Re: Bubble sextants on e-bayMichael Dorl7 Jun 2009, 14:307219g8568
Re: Bubble sextants on e-bayDouglas Denny7 Jun 2009, 14:17321937g8567
Re: Bubble sextants on e-bayDouglas Denny7 Jun 2009, 13:406503g8566
Re: Bubble sextants on e-bayDouglas Denny7 Jun 2009, 13:31139712g8565
Re: Bubble sextants on e-bayDouglas Denny7 Jun 2009, 13:06197862g8564
Re: Polynesian navigationJohn H7 Jun 2009, 12:4110713g8563
Re: Bubble sextants on e-bayBill Morris7 Jun 2009, 11:2110959g8562
Re: Viking sun compass artifact and Viking sun stones.Nicolàs de Hilster7 Jun 2009, 10:257565g8561
Viking sun compass artifact and Viking sun stones.Geoffrey Kolbe7 Jun 2009, 06:069760g8560
Re: Bubble sextants on e-bayJean-Philippe Planas7 Jun 2009, 09:1110749g8559
Re: Polynesian navigationKen Muldrew7 Jun 2009, 03:317050g8558
Re: Moon occults AntaresKen Muldrew7 Jun 2009, 03:226376g8557
Re: Polynesian navigationFrank Reed7 Jun 2009, 01:006674g8556
Re: Polynesian navigationFrank Reed6 Jun 2009, 23:506203g8555
Re: Polynesian navigationFrank Reed6 Jun 2009, 23:356694g8554
Re: Polynesian navigationJohn H6 Jun 2009, 23:2012539g8553
Re: Polynesian navigationFrank Reed6 Jun 2009, 23:157816g8552
Re: Polynesian navigationFrank Reed6 Jun 2009, 22:556506g8551
Re: Bubble sextants on e-bayDouglas Denny6 Jun 2009, 22:426940g8550
Re: Polynesian navigationFrank Reed6 Jun 2009, 22:398039g8549
Re: Bubble sextants on e-bayDouglas Denny6 Jun 2009, 22:357417g8548
Re: Bubble sextants on e-bayGary LaPook6 Jun 2009, 22:296209g8547
Moon occults AntaresFrank Reed6 Jun 2009, 21:356388g8546
Re: Bubble sextants on e-bayJean-Philippe Planas6 Jun 2009, 21:308931g8545
Re: Polynesian navigationJohn H6 Jun 2009, 21:2911619g8544
Re: Bubble sextants on e-bayDouglas Denny6 Jun 2009, 21:287198g8543
Re: Bubble sextants on e-bayDave Walden6 Jun 2009, 21:185263g8542
Re: Bubble SextantDouglas Denny6 Jun 2009, 21:157145g8541
Re: Bubble sextants on e-bayNavList Messages6 Jun 2009, 20:475534g8540
Re: Polynesian navigationGeorge Huxtable6 Jun 2009, 19:18301546g8539
Re: Polynesian navigationPeter Fogg6 Jun 2009, 17:019065g8538
Re: Polynesian navigationWolfgang Köberer6 Jun 2009, 14:5411453g8537
Re: Polynesian navigationJohn H6 Jun 2009, 12:4910156g8536
Re: Polynesian navigationPeter Fogg6 Jun 2009, 05:197031g8535
Re: Polynesian navigationGreg Rudzinski6 Jun 2009, 03:535034g8534
Re: Polynesian navigationFrank Reed6 Jun 2009, 03:355554g8533
Re: Polynesian navigationFrank Reed6 Jun 2009, 03:255875g8532
Polynesian navigationFrank Reed6 Jun 2009, 03:0210746g8531
Re: Piloting Trombone Kamal & SunruleGreg Rudzinski6 Jun 2009, 01:034770g8530
Re: Piloting Trombone Kamal & SunrulePeter Fogg6 Jun 2009, 00:546944g8529
Re: Trombone Kamal PrototypeGreg Rudzinski5 Jun 2009, 23:546485g8528
Re: Trombone Kamal PrototypeGeorge Huxtable5 Jun 2009, 23:207301g8527
Re: Trombone Kamal PrototypeGreg Rudzinski5 Jun 2009, 23:117566g8526
Re: Trombone Kamal PrototypePeter Fogg5 Jun 2009, 23:059417g8525
Re: Trombone Kamal PrototypeGreg Rudzinski5 Jun 2009, 22:5910812g8524
Piloting Trombone Kamal & SunruleGreg Rudzinski5 Jun 2009, 22:3493234g8523
Re: Trombone Kamal PrototypeFrank Reed5 Jun 2009, 22:288232g8522
Re: Trombone Kamal PrototypeGreg Rudzinski5 Jun 2009, 22:2111223g8521
Re: Trombone Kamal PrototypeGeorge Huxtable5 Jun 2009, 20:4611920g8520
Re: Trombone Kamal PrototypeGreg Rudzinski5 Jun 2009, 20:066541g8519
Re: Trombone Kamal PrototypeGreg Rudzinski5 Jun 2009, 15:305730g8518
Re: Trombone Kamal PrototypeGreg Rudzinski5 Jun 2009, 15:165365g8517
Re: Trombone Kamal PrototypeGreg Rudzinski5 Jun 2009, 15:135817g8516
Re: Trombone Kamal PrototypeAndrés Ruiz5 Jun 2009, 07:3817891g8515
Re: Almanac dataFrank Reed5 Jun 2009, 06:407199g8514
Re: Trombone Kamal PrototypeFrank Reed5 Jun 2009, 04:307386g8513
Re: Trombone Kamal PrototypeGreg Rudzinski5 Jun 2009, 03:187125g8512
Re: Trombone Kamal PrototypeGreg Rudzinski4 Jun 2009, 21:498344g8511
Re: Trombone Kamal PrototypeHewitt Schlereth4 Jun 2009, 19:579343g8510
Re: New to the listJohn H4 Jun 2009, 15:019214g8509
Re: New to the listGeorge Huxtable4 Jun 2009, 09:575820g8508
Re: Trombone Kamal PrototypeGreg Rudzinski4 Jun 2009, 04:576922g8507
Re: Planisphere pour les Distances LunairesFrank Reed4 Jun 2009, 01:337563g8506
Re: New to the listGary LaPook4 Jun 2009, 00:217826g8505
Re: New to the listJohn H3 Jun 2009, 22:479959g8504
Re: New to the listGeorge Huxtable3 Jun 2009, 22:199014g8503
Re: The sinking of the MarquesPeter Smith3 Jun 2009, 20:337656g8502
Trombone Kamal PrototypeGreg Rudzinski3 Jun 2009, 17:521674867g8501
The sinking of the MarquesFrank Reed3 Jun 2009, 03:218990g8500
Re: Planisphere pour les Distances LunairesFrank Reed3 Jun 2009, 02:4210373g8499
Re: New to the listJohn H2 Jun 2009, 18:448714g8498
Re: New to the listGreg Rudzinski2 Jun 2009, 21:468366g8497
Re: New to the listJohn H2 Jun 2009, 16:558117g8496
Re: New to the listGeorge Huxtable2 Jun 2009, 18:5612189g8495
Re: New to the listChristian Scheele2 Jun 2009, 18:237791g8494
Re: New to the listGreg Rudzinski2 Jun 2009, 16:426286g8493
Re: New to the listJohn H2 Jun 2009, 12:219773g8492
Re: New to the listJohn H2 Jun 2009, 11:1013788g8491
Re: The Bygrave Slide RuleGary LaPook2 Jun 2009, 11:36469923g8490
Re: Slide Rule AzimuthGary LaPook2 Jun 2009, 08:061115478g8489
Re: New to the listGreg Rudzinski2 Jun 2009, 04:157308g8488
Re: New to the listJeremy C2 Jun 2009, 02:505206g8487
Re: New to the listJames N Wilson2 Jun 2009, 02:297910g8486
Re: Slide Rule AzimuthBill Noyce1 Jun 2009, 18:386676g8485
New to the listJohn H1 Jun 2009, 15:1511655g8484
Planisphere pour les Distances LunairesNicolàs de Hilster1 Jun 2009, 12:226179g8483
Re: Oughtred on Lat and long.Dave Walden1 Jun 2009, 11:5097964g8482
Oughtred on Lat and long.George Huxtable1 Jun 2009, 09:421681674g8481
Re:]Navlist 8479] Re: napier and logarithmsGeorge Huxtable1 Jun 2009, 09:321342306g8480
Re: napier and logarithmsJames N Wilson1 Jun 2009, 03:338449g8479
Re: twilight computerDave Walden31 May 2009, 15:496469g8478
Re: Slide Rule AzimuthHewitt Schlereth31 May 2009, 11:5314144g8477
Re: Slide Rule AzimuthGreg Rudzinski31 May 2009, 11:1111808g8476
Re: Slide Rule AzimuthHewitt Schlereth31 May 2009, 10:4012353g8475
Re: [Sextants] Tamaya sextant designs & WEB ARCHIVESGreg Rudzinski31 May 2009, 10:354937g8474
Re: twilight computerGary LaPook31 May 2009, 09:182237848g8473
Re: Slide Rule AzimuthGary LaPook31 May 2009, 07:2913070g8472
Re: Almanac dataPeter Hakel31 May 2009, 00:1111149g8471
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneJames N Wilson31 May 2009, 00:216404g8470
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneFrank Reed31 May 2009, 00:216722g8469
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneHewitt Schlereth31 May 2009, 00:166189g8468
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneFrank Reed31 May 2009, 00:035555g8467
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneFrank Reed30 May 2009, 23:556157g8466
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneDave Walden30 May 2009, 23:345936g8465
Re: [Sextants] Tamaya sextant designs & WEB ARCHIVESNavList Messages30 May 2009, 22:586478g8464
Re: Almanac dataFrank Reed30 May 2009, 23:087684g8463
Re: The Bygrave Slide RuleDouglas Denny30 May 2009, 22:2769096g8462
Re: Basic question regarding Napier's trianglesNavList Messages30 May 2009, 11:136919g8461
The Bygrave Slide RuleNavList Messages30 May 2009, 06:316462g8460
Re: Basic question regarding Napier's trianglesNavList Messages30 May 2009, 11:186696g8459
Re: Slide Rule AzimuthGeorge Huxtable30 May 2009, 19:1610093g8458
AquinoDave Walden30 May 2009, 19:036712g8457
Sun Hc using Two Slide RulesGreg Rudzinski30 May 2009, 18:074899g8456
Re: Slide Rule AzimuthGary LaPook30 May 2009, 12:128501g8455
Re: napier and logarithmsGeorge Huxtable30 May 2009, 11:291631888g8454
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Gary LaPook30 May 2009, 10:496417g8453
Byrd Sextant (or should it be "de Florez sextant")Bill Morris30 May 2009, 09:45878895g8452
Re: napier and logarithmsPaul Hirose30 May 2009, 04:128727g8451
Re: twilight computerRobert Eno30 May 2009, 01:221748321g8450
Re: The Bygrave Slide ruleGary LaPook30 May 2009, 01:246115g8449
Almanac dataPeter Hakel29 May 2009, 22:308082g8448
The Bygrave Slide ruleNavList Messages29 May 2009, 21:396840g8447
Re: twilight computerDave Walden29 May 2009, 23:166371g8446
Twilight computerDave Walden29 May 2009, 20:516410g8445
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Brad Morris29 May 2009, 20:34251863g8444
Slide Rule AzimuthGreg Rudzinski29 May 2009, 19:445041g8443
Re: The Bygrave Slide ruleBrad Morris29 May 2009, 17:369622g8442
The Bygrave Slide ruleNavList Messages29 May 2009, 09:468035g8441
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Gary LaPook29 May 2009, 10:502160218g8440
Re: Arg 1 Ww 11 U Boat Navigation Device Ebay Itemnumber: 370193239339Gary LaPook29 May 2009, 06:366018g8439
Re: Dennert & Pape MHR-1 HR-2 Cylindrical Slide LineRulerGary LaPook29 May 2009, 06:354773g8438
Re: napier and logarithmsJ Cora29 May 2009, 04:338219g8437
Re: 10 inch Slide Rule vs. Pocket CalculatorGreg Rudzinski29 May 2009, 02:206627g8436
Re: The Bygrave Slide RuleBrad Morris29 May 2009, 00:207794g8435
Re: Basic question regarding Napier's trianglesPeter Hakel28 May 2009, 23:0413659g8434
Re: Basic question regarding Napier's trianglesBill Noyce28 May 2009, 23:028099g8433
Basic question regarding Napier's trianglesNavList Messages28 May 2009, 19:168295g8432
Re: The Bygrave Slide RuleGary LaPook28 May 2009, 19:3520181g8431
The Bygrave Slide RuleNavList Messages28 May 2009, 18:3210060g8430
Re: napier and logarithmsDave Walden28 May 2009, 17:406478g8429
Re: napier and logarithmsMichael Dorl28 May 2009, 13:167317g8428
Napier and logarithmsJ Cora28 May 2009, 13:067669g8427
Re: Arg 1 Ww 11 U Boat Navigation Device Ebay Item Number: 370193239339Dave Walden28 May 2009, 12:1168936g8426
Re: Arg 1 Ww 11 U Boat Navigation Device Ebay Item Number: 370193239339Dave Walden28 May 2009, 11:5874029g8425
Re: The Bygrave Slide RuleGary LaPook28 May 2009, 11:2317105g8424
Re: 10 inch Slide Rule vs. Pocket CalculatorGary LaPook28 May 2009, 09:547013g8423
Re: 10 inch Slide Rule vs. Pocket CalculatorGary LaPook28 May 2009, 09:486688g8422
Re: The Bygrave Slide RuleRonald van Riet28 May 2009, 08:455614g8421
Re: Arg 1 Ww 11 U Boat Navigation Device Ebay Item Number: 370193239339John Doe28 May 2009, 04:317495g8420
Slide RulesBruce Hamilton28 May 2009, 03:066050g8419
Re: 10 inch Slide Rule vs. Pocket CalculatorHewitt Schlereth28 May 2009, 02:427920g8418
10 inch Slide Rule vs. Pocket CalculatorGreg Rudzinski28 May 2009, 02:015403g8417
Re: Arg 1 Ww 11 U Boat Navigation Device Ebay Item Number: 370193239339Dave Walden27 May 2009, 23:51162008g8416
The Bygrave Slide RuleNavList Messages27 May 2009, 21:5710659g8415
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneGeorge Huxtable26 May 2009, 23:0012867g8414
Re: Dennert & Pape MHR-1 HR-2 Cylindrical Slide Line RulerDave Walden26 May 2009, 02:096419g8413
Re: Dennert & Pape MHR-1 HR-2 Cylindrical Slide Line RulerGary LaPook25 May 2009, 21:125045g8412
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Gary LaPook25 May 2009, 20:5711027g8411
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Gary LaPook24 May 2009, 21:4810325g8410
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Greg Rudzinski24 May 2009, 18:1410503g8409
Re: Dennert & Pape MHR-1 HR-2 Cylindrical Slide Line RulerPeter Fogg24 May 2009, 06:218244g8408
Re: Dennert & Pape MHR-1 HR-2 Cylindrical Slide Line RulerNavList Messages24 May 2009, 06:006749g8407
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Paul Hirose24 May 2009, 04:0011097g8406
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Brad Morris23 May 2009, 18:537827g8405
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneLu Abel23 May 2009, 18:527878g8404
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneLu Abel23 May 2009, 18:517871g8403
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?Greg Rudzinski23 May 2009, 18:185489g8402
Manufacture new Bygraves?Frank Reed23 May 2009, 17:276959g8401
Re: Arg 1 Ww 11 U Boat Navigation Device Ebay Item Number: 370193239339Gary LaPook23 May 2009, 17:017869g8400
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneFrank Reed23 May 2009, 16:157697g8399
Re: Arg 1 Ww 11 U Boat Navigationdevice Ebay Item Number: 370193239339Gary LaPook23 May 2009, 10:454127608g8398
Re: Sextant framesFrank Reed23 May 2009, 04:257989g8397
Re: Sextant framesJames N Wilson23 May 2009, 03:156984g8396
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneBrad Morris23 May 2009, 03:098017g8395
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneDave Walden23 May 2009, 01:506287g8394
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneFrank Reed23 May 2009, 00:268530g8393
Re: recommendation for slide rule ? BygraveDave Walden23 May 2009, 00:176276g8392
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneFrank Reed23 May 2009, 00:056696g8391
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneLu Abel23 May 2009, 00:037839g8390
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneDave Walden22 May 2009, 23:237608g8389
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneFrank Reed22 May 2009, 23:0711184g8388
Re: Arg 1 Ww 11 U Boat Navigationdevice Ebay Item Number: 370193239339Ken Gebhart22 May 2009, 20:379097g8387
Re: GPS Maybe Not as Healthy as ThoughtRichard B. Langley22 May 2009, 20:1911478g8386
Re: Round-offFrank Reed22 May 2009, 19:338323g8385
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneGeorge Huxtable22 May 2009, 19:138966g8384
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneBrad Morris22 May 2009, 19:0211621g8383
Re: GPS Maybe Not as Healthy as ThoughtFrank Reed22 May 2009, 18:3610555g8382
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneFrank Reed22 May 2009, 17:537417g8381
Re: Round-offFrank Reed22 May 2009, 17:2912158g8380
Re: Arg 1 Ww 11 U Boat Navigationdevice Ebay Item Number: 370193239339Jean-Philippe Planas22 May 2009, 17:0814769g8379
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneGreg Rudzinski22 May 2009, 17:066923g8378
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneKen Muldrew22 May 2009, 16:427207g8377
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneFrank Reed22 May 2009, 16:198325g8376
Re: Arg 1 Ww 11 U Boat Navigationdevice Ebay Item Number: 370193239339Brad Morris22 May 2009, 13:118489g8375
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Brad Morris22 May 2009, 12:3811903g8374
Re: Arg 1 Ww 11 U Boat Navigationdevice Ebay Item Number: 370193239339Wolfgang Köberer22 May 2009, 11:099444g8373
Arg 1 Ww 11 U Boat Navigation Device Ebay Itemnumber: 370193239339NavList Messages22 May 2009, 08:487827g8372
Re: recommendation for slide rule ? BygraveGary LaPook22 May 2009, 07:35782877g8371
Re: recommendation for slide rule ? BygraveGary LaPook22 May 2009, 05:208042g8370
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Greg Rudzinski22 May 2009, 03:4810343g8369
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Gary LaPook22 May 2009, 00:2319704g8368
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Greg Rudzinski22 May 2009, 00:199535g8367
Re: recommendation for slide rule ? BygraveJames N Wilson22 May 2009, 00:1592271g8366
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Gary LaPook21 May 2009, 23:4712750g8365
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Paul Hirose21 May 2009, 23:0011271g8364
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Gary LaPook21 May 2009, 22:269061g8363
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Lu Abel21 May 2009, 22:2321363g8362
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Gary LaPook21 May 2009, 22:209091g8361
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Gary LaPook21 May 2009, 22:205532g8360
Re: Troughton's reflecting circleBrad Morris21 May 2009, 21:017981g8359
Re: freeware "navastro" is available in EnglishNavList Messages21 May 2009, 20:396629g8358
Re: freeware "navastro" is available in EnglishOlivier Ravet21 May 2009, 20:334967g8357
Re: Troughton's reflecting circleBill Morris21 May 2009, 20:126724g8356
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Greg Rudzinski21 May 2009, 18:228578g8355
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?J Cora21 May 2009, 16:4210570g8354
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Hewitt Schlereth21 May 2009, 15:3711317g8353
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Brad Morris21 May 2009, 14:4010177g8352
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Dave Walden21 May 2009, 13:385270g8351
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Andrew Nikitin21 May 2009, 13:286802g8350
Troughton's reflecting circlePaul Hirose21 May 2009, 07:056904g8349
Mark IX on Vancouver CraigslistBruce Hamilton21 May 2009, 06:065807g8348
Re: recommendation for slide rule ? BygraveBruce Hamilton21 May 2009, 06:016800g8347
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Gary LaPook21 May 2009, 03:517782g8346
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Gary LaPook21 May 2009, 03:286454g8345
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Gary LaPook21 May 2009, 03:175570g8344
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Gary LaPook21 May 2009, 03:109773g8343
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Dave Walden21 May 2009, 03:0533108g8342
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Greg Rudzinski21 May 2009, 00:257082g8341
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Gary LaPook20 May 2009, 23:05789358g8340
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Gary LaPook20 May 2009, 22:592533089g8339
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Peter Hakel20 May 2009, 18:4610554g8338
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Greg Rudzinski20 May 2009, 18:115872g8337
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Hein Bodahl20 May 2009, 12:077775g8336
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Hewitt Schlereth20 May 2009, 16:5712086g8335
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Greg Rudzinski20 May 2009, 16:389637g8334
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Michael Dorl20 May 2009, 15:567724g8333
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Hewitt Schlereth20 May 2009, 15:5611133g8332
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Brad Morris20 May 2009, 15:2510184g8331
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Greg Rudzinski20 May 2009, 04:496154g8330
Re: freeware "navastro" is available in EnglishHenry Halboth20 May 2009, 01:2410981g8329
Re: GPS Maybe Not as Healthy as ThoughtKen Gebhart20 May 2009, 01:235890g8328
GPS Maybe Not as Healthy as ThoughtScott Owen19 May 2009, 22:457067g8327
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?John Doe19 May 2009, 13:418070g8326
Re: freeware "navastro" is available in EnglishGuy Schwartz19 May 2009, 17:207533g8325
Online Equation SolverBruce Hamilton19 May 2009, 17:108120g8324
Re: Round-offJohn Karl19 May 2009, 03:185317g8323
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneGeorge Huxtable18 May 2009, 22:347106g8322
Re: freeware "navastro" is available in EnglishBill Morris18 May 2009, 20:096341g8321
Re: freeware "navastro" is available in EnglishDave Walden18 May 2009, 19:176340g8320
Re: freeware "navastro" is available in EnglishLuc Desmedt18 May 2009, 18:037050g8319
Re: freeware "navastro" is available in EnglishLu Abel18 May 2009, 16:436059g8318
Freeware "navastro" is available in EnglishNavList Messages18 May 2009, 15:506448g8317
Re: Round-offJames N Wilson18 May 2009, 03:576313g8316
Re: Round-offJeremy C18 May 2009, 01:409259g8315
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Gary LaPook18 May 2009, 01:215528g8314
Re: Round-offPeter Fogg18 May 2009, 00:589536g8313
Re: Round-offLu Abel18 May 2009, 00:286891g8312
Re: Round-offJeremy C18 May 2009, 00:085421g8311
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?George Huxtable17 May 2009, 23:217738g8310
Re: recommendation for slide rule ?Paul Hirose17 May 2009, 22:2512440g8309
Re: Round-offFrank Reed16 May 2009, 20:086913g8308
Re: Round-offPeter Fogg16 May 2009, 20:088550g8307
Recommendation for slide rule ?J Cora16 May 2009, 17:166780g8306
Re: Round-offJohn Karl16 May 2009, 17:155013g8305
Re: Round-offGeorge Huxtable16 May 2009, 15:137936g8304
Re: Round-offJohn Karl16 May 2009, 13:296023g8303
Re: Round-offPeter Fogg16 May 2009, 08:2015646g8302
Re: Round-offJohn Karl16 May 2009, 03:176246g8301
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneLu Abel16 May 2009, 02:545844g8300
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneJames N Wilson16 May 2009, 01:356769g8299
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneGeorge Huxtable15 May 2009, 23:397905g8298
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneGeorge Huxtable15 May 2009, 19:316059g8297
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneKen Muldrew15 May 2009, 18:476872g8296
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneGeorge Huxtable15 May 2009, 18:407013g8295
Re: Longitude by altitudes. was Re: How Many Chronometers?Peter Fogg15 May 2009, 09:4610303g8294
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneGeorge Huxtable15 May 2009, 07:519663g8293
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneGeorge Huxtable15 May 2009, 08:148424g8292
Re: Round-offPeter Fogg15 May 2009, 02:349167g8291
Re: Round-offJohn Karl15 May 2009, 02:175518g8290
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneBrad Morris15 May 2009, 02:037807g8289
Re: An 5851Gary LaPook14 May 2009, 22:426181g8288
Re: Ancient Lunar Longitudes?Peter Fogg14 May 2009, 22:408028g8287
An 5851Gary LaPook14 May 2009, 22:286130g8286
Re: Sextant AN 5851-1NavList Messages14 May 2009, 21:326464g8285
Re: Bowditch Tables on-line?J Parsons14 May 2009, 21:236422g8284
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneKen Gebhart14 May 2009, 21:2713125g8283
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneGary LaPook14 May 2009, 21:069059g8282
Re: Longitude by altitudes. was Re: How Many Chronometers?Peter Fogg14 May 2009, 20:2920111g8281
Re: Bowditch Tables on-line?Frank Reed14 May 2009, 20:266450g8280
Re: Round-offFrank Reed14 May 2009, 20:237066g8279
Bowditch Tables on-line?J Parsons14 May 2009, 19:296570g8278
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneFred Hebard14 May 2009, 20:166895g8277
Round-offPeter Hakel14 May 2009, 18:4810610g8276
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneFrank Reed14 May 2009, 20:1010012g8275
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneFrank Reed14 May 2009, 19:177028g8274
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneBrad Morris14 May 2009, 18:2710903g8273
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneLu Abel14 May 2009, 18:159471g8272
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneBrad Morris14 May 2009, 17:598650g8271
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneJames N Wilson14 May 2009, 17:516888g8270
Re: Longitude by altitudes. was Re: How Many Chronometers?Fred Hebard14 May 2009, 17:4210975g8269
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneBrad Morris14 May 2009, 17:1912410g8268
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneGeorge Huxtable14 May 2009, 17:039955g8267
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneFred Hebard14 May 2009, 16:386332g8266
Re: Ancient Lunar Longitudes?Ken Muldrew14 May 2009, 16:277176g8265
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneBrad Morris14 May 2009, 16:2115218g8264
Re: Learn the stars, by phonePeter Hakel14 May 2009, 15:1811352g8263
Ancient Lunar Longitudes?Frank Reed14 May 2009, 16:0411473g8262
Re: Longitude by altitudes. was Re: How Many Chronometers?Brad Morris14 May 2009, 15:029700g8261
Re: Longitude by altitudes. was Re: How Many Chronometers?Marcel Tschudin14 May 2009, 14:539328g8260
Re: Longitude by altitudes. was Re: How Many Chronometers?Frank Reed14 May 2009, 13:556959g8259
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneFrank Reed14 May 2009, 13:2710680g8258
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneBrad Morris14 May 2009, 12:328363g8257
Re: Longitude by altitudes. was Re: How Many Chronometers?Peter Fogg14 May 2009, 11:5819921g8256
Re: Learn the stars, by phoneGeorge Huxtable14 May 2009, 10:0411043g8255
Learn the stars, by phoneFrank Reed14 May 2009, 01:028208g8254
Re: Longitude by altitudes. was Re: How Many Chronometers?Frank Reed13 May 2009, 17:078731g8253
Re: Longitude by altitudes. was Re: How Many Chronometers?Frank Reed13 May 2009, 16:346598g8252
Re: Longitude by altitudes. was Re: How Many Chronometers?Marcel Tschudin13 May 2009, 15:368192g8251
Re: Longitude by altitudes. was Re: How Many Chronometers?Frank Reed13 May 2009, 14:209482g8250
Re: Longitude by altitudes. was Re: How Many Chronometers?Brad Morris13 May 2009, 13:5211924g8249
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITFrank Reed13 May 2009, 13:518124g8248
Re: Longitude by altitudes. was Re: How Many Chronometers?Frank Reed13 May 2009, 13:3910778g8247
Re: Sextant framesBrad Morris13 May 2009, 13:258186g8246
Re: Longitude by altitudes. was Re: How Many Chronometers?Marcel Tschudin13 May 2009, 07:297073g8245
Re: Sextant framesBill Morris13 May 2009, 03:207836g8244
Re: Longitude by altitudes. was Re: How Many Chronometers?Peter Fogg13 May 2009, 03:1314284g8243
Re: Longitude by altitudes. was Re: How Many Chronometers?Peter Fogg13 May 2009, 01:4310168g8242
Re: Longitude by altitudes. was Re: How Many Chronometers?Marcel Tschudin12 May 2009, 22:427530g8241
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITBrad Morris12 May 2009, 21:4413033g8240
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITGary LaPook12 May 2009, 21:0712022g8239
Re: How Many Chronometers?Frank Reed12 May 2009, 21:056634g8238
Re: How Many Chronometers?Frank Reed12 May 2009, 20:597184g8237
Re: Moon HorizonFrank Reed12 May 2009, 20:477766g8236
Re: How Many Chronometers?Frank Reed12 May 2009, 20:3714485g8235
Re: Longitude by altitudes. was Re: HowMany Chronometers?Frank Reed12 May 2009, 19:559013g8234
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITBrad Morris12 May 2009, 19:1411747g8233
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITJames N Wilson12 May 2009, 18:427161g8232
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITFrank Reed12 May 2009, 18:429750g8231
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITBrad Morris12 May 2009, 14:317935g8230
Re: How Many Chronometers?James N Wilson12 May 2009, 01:096130g8229
Re: How Many Chronometers?Robert Eno12 May 2009, 00:569849g8228
Re: How Many Chronometers?Brad Morris11 May 2009, 16:587678g8227
Re: How Many Chronometers?Greg Rudzinski11 May 2009, 16:195331g8226
Re: How Many Chronometers?George Huxtable11 May 2009, 11:009008g8225
Re: How Many Chronometers?Gary LaPook11 May 2009, 09:1712050g8224
Re: How Many Chronometers?Frank Reed11 May 2009, 07:349228g8223
Re: How Many Chronometers?Frank Reed11 May 2009, 07:068970g8222
Re: How Many Chronometers?Frank Reed11 May 2009, 06:448311g8221
Re: How Many Chronometers?Frank Reed11 May 2009, 06:317270g8220
Re: How Many Chronometers?Frank Reed11 May 2009, 06:207552g8219
Re: How Many Chronometers?Frank Reed11 May 2009, 06:079839g8218
Re: Moon HorizonPeter Fogg11 May 2009, 02:309001g8217
Re: Moon HorizonJeremy C11 May 2009, 02:204904g8216
Welcome BPeter Fogg10 May 2009, 23:025951g8215
Re: Moon HorizonGeorge Huxtable10 May 2009, 22:597224g8214
Re: Moon HorizonPeter Fogg10 May 2009, 22:1910041g8213
Moon HorizonThomas Kleemann10 May 2009, 21:206440g8212
Re: Precision of sextant observations: taken from How many chronometers?Bill Morris10 May 2009, 05:24706322g8211
Re: How Many Chronometers?Paul Hirose9 May 2009, 22:199411g8210
Re: Precision of sextant observations: taken from How many chronometers?Henry Halboth9 May 2009, 20:0318301g8209
Re: Precision of sextant observations: taken from How many chronometers?Henry Halboth9 May 2009, 19:5617926g8208
Ebay ChronometerGreg Rudzinski9 May 2009, 19:004996g8207
Precision of sextant observations: taken from How many chronometers?George Huxtable9 May 2009, 11:0610339g8206
Re: How Many Chronometers?George Huxtable9 May 2009, 09:059246g8205
Re: Old mapsMarcel Tschudin9 May 2009, 06:287044g8204
Re: How Many Chronometers?Paul Hirose9 May 2009, 04:376760g8203
Re: How Many Chronometers?Henry Halboth9 May 2009, 03:5224984g8202
Re: BudgetsLu Abel8 May 2009, 22:338990g8201
Re: BudgetsNavList Messages8 May 2009, 18:136514g8200
Re: BudgetsJeremy C8 May 2009, 17:415573g8199
Re: BudgetsLu Abel8 May 2009, 16:265999g8198
Re: Old mapsWolfgang Köberer8 May 2009, 15:339828g8197
Re: How Many Chronometers?George Huxtable8 May 2009, 15:087350g8196
Re: Old mapsGeorge Huxtable8 May 2009, 14:476990g8195
Re: How Many Chronometers?Fred Hebard8 May 2009, 14:246852g8194
Re: How Many Chronometers?Jeremy C8 May 2009, 14:045508g8193
Re: How Many Chronometers?George Huxtable8 May 2009, 13:409922g8192
Re: BudgetsJeremy C8 May 2009, 12:494540g8191
Re: Longitude by altitudes. was Re: HowMany Chronometers?Marcel Tschudin8 May 2009, 12:288524g8190
Longitude by altitudes. was Re: HowMany Chronometers?George Huxtable8 May 2009, 09:4710907g8189
Re: How Many Chronometers?Paul Hirose8 May 2009, 02:577970g8188
Re: How Many Chronometers?Dave Walden8 May 2009, 01:496463g8187
Re: How Many Chronometers?Mike Burkes8 May 2009, 00:135522g8186
Re: BudgetsLu Abel7 May 2009, 23:508806g8185
BudgetsPeter Hakel7 May 2009, 23:258349g8184
Re: How Many Chronometers?James N Wilson7 May 2009, 20:446355g8183
Re: How Many Chronometers?George Huxtable7 May 2009, 20:408034g8182
Re: How Many Chronometers?Brad Morris7 May 2009, 17:088915g8181
Re: How Many Chronometers?James N Wilson7 May 2009, 02:486341g8180
Re: How Many Chronometers?Brad Morris7 May 2009, 13:059669g8179
Re: How Many Chronometers?Geoffrey Kolbe7 May 2009, 11:408228g8178
Re: Harrison's H1George Huxtable7 May 2009, 10:109893g8177
Re: How Many Chronometers?George Huxtable7 May 2009, 09:517289g8176
Re: How Many Chronometers?George Huxtable7 May 2009, 09:329918g8175
Re: How Many Chronometers?Jeremy C7 May 2009, 02:426232g8174
Re: How Many Chronometers?Brad Morris7 May 2009, 02:268799g8173
Re: How Many Chronometers?Peter Fogg7 May 2009, 01:117324g8172
Re: How Many Chronometers?Henry Halboth7 May 2009, 01:0016776g8171
Re: Harrison's H1Brad Morris6 May 2009, 23:327191g8170
Re: How Many Chronometers?James N Wilson6 May 2009, 23:2110387g8169
Re: How Many Chronometers?Greg R_6 May 2009, 22:0310555g8168
Re: How Many Chronometers?George Huxtable6 May 2009, 21:55223603g8167
Re: How Many Chronometers?James N Wilson6 May 2009, 21:247909g8166
Re: How Many Chronometers?Robert Eno6 May 2009, 21:1311295g8165
Re: How Many Chronometers?Brad Morris6 May 2009, 20:578047g8164
Re: How Many Chronometers?James N Wilson6 May 2009, 20:396233g8163
Re: How Many Chronometers?Greg Rudzinski6 May 2009, 20:385514g8162
Re: How Many Chronometers?Brad Morris6 May 2009, 20:317820g8161
Re: How Many Chronometers?Henry Halboth6 May 2009, 20:1911947g8160
Re: How Many Chronometers?James N Wilson6 May 2009, 19:316266g8159
Re: How Many Chronometers?Brad Morris6 May 2009, 17:228487g8158
How Many Chronometers?Greg Rudzinski6 May 2009, 17:104769g8157
"Sextant" music CDPaul Hirose6 May 2009, 03:196303g8156
1887 surveyPeter Fogg6 May 2009, 03:04525454g8155
Old mapsMarcel Tschudin5 May 2009, 14:016847g8154
Re: Beware of your GPS!Bill B5 May 2009, 09:227646g8153
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITJames N Wilson5 May 2009, 03:296617g8152
Sights around noon - correction for motionFrank Reed5 May 2009, 00:068251g8151
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITJames N Wilson4 May 2009, 20:5310073g8150
Re: Exercise #14 Multi-Moon LOP'sBrad Morris3 May 2009, 19:069503g8149
Re: Exercise #14 Multi-Moon LOP'sGeorge Huxtable3 May 2009, 14:3111299g8148
Re: Beware of your GPS!Robert Eno3 May 2009, 14:167717g8147
Re: The Frank Reed School of NavigationFrank Reed3 May 2009, 08:198653g8146
Re: Exercise #14 Multi-Moon LOP'sFrank Reed3 May 2009, 07:326959g8145
Re: Exercise #14 Multi-Moon LOP'sFrank Reed3 May 2009, 07:139623g8144
Re: Exercise #14 Multi-Moon LOP'sFrank Reed3 May 2009, 06:148651g8143
Re: Latitude by Noon Sun for BeginnersFrank Reed3 May 2009, 04:037514g8142
Re: Beware of your GPS!Frank Reed3 May 2009, 03:426596g8141
Re: Beware of your GPS!Frank Reed3 May 2009, 03:228066g8140
Re: Beware of your GPS!Lu Abel2 May 2009, 15:258878g8139
Re: Exercise #14 Multi-Moon LOP'sGeorge Huxtable2 May 2009, 14:419412g8138
Re: Beware of your GPS!Rob M2 May 2009, 13:015327g8137
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITDave Walden2 May 2009, 10:196558g8136
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITMarcel Tschudin2 May 2009, 09:027036g8135
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITDave Walden2 May 2009, 00:1142093g8134
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITGeorge Huxtable1 May 2009, 22:50394398g8133
Re: Exercise #14 Multi-Moon LOP'sBrad Morris1 May 2009, 20:538087g8132
Re: Beware of your GPS!Ken Gebhart1 May 2009, 20:3810704g8131
Re: Exercise #14 Multi-Moon LOP'sJeremy C1 May 2009, 20:076492g8130
Re: Exercise #14 Multi-Moon LOP'sJeremy C1 May 2009, 20:015352g8129
Re: Beware of your GPS!Brad Morris1 May 2009, 19:5619809g8128
Re: Exercise #14 Multi-Moon LOP'sBrad Morris1 May 2009, 19:5210013g8127
Re: Exercise #14 Multi-Moon LOP'sJeremy C1 May 2009, 19:4553412g8126
Re: Beware of your GPS!Fred Hebard1 May 2009, 19:436283g8125
Re: Beware of your GPS!Peter Fogg1 May 2009, 19:379827g8124
Re: Beware of your GPS!Dave Walden1 May 2009, 19:376232g8123
Re: Beware of your GPS!Fred Hebard1 May 2009, 19:336931g8122
Re: Beware of your GPS!Jeremy C1 May 2009, 19:285396g8121
Re: Beware of your GPS!Peter Fogg1 May 2009, 19:2010434g8120
Re: Beware of your GPS!Brad Morris1 May 2009, 19:0713747g8119
Re: Beware of your GPS!Peter Fogg1 May 2009, 18:247634g8118
Re: Beware of your GPS!Fred Hebard1 May 2009, 18:106176g8117
Re: Beware of your GPS!Peter Fogg1 May 2009, 18:0011672g8116
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITDave Walden1 May 2009, 17:046327g8115
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITDave Walden1 May 2009, 15:575610g8114
Re: Latitude by Noon Sun for BeginnersJ Parsons30 Apr 2009, 15:526684g8113
Re: Beware of your GPS!Brad Morris1 May 2009, 12:498419g8112
Re: Beware of your GPS!R B Emerson1 May 2009, 12:302118g8111
Beware of your GPS!Peter Fogg1 May 2009, 05:464401g8110
Re: Latitude by Noon Sun for BeginnersJohn Karl30 Apr 2009, 16:146315g8109
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITBrad Morris30 Apr 2009, 14:167749g8108
Re: Latitude by Noon Sun for BeginnersJ Parsons29 Apr 2009, 22:306383g8107
Re: Latitude by Noon Sun for BeginnersGary LaPook29 Apr 2009, 22:2013125g8106
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITJames N Wilson29 Apr 2009, 21:276636g8105
Re: Latitude by Noon Sun for BeginnersJean-Philippe Planas29 Apr 2009, 21:2011604g8104
Re: Latitude by Noon Sun for BeginnersJ Parsons29 Apr 2009, 20:197933g8103
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITBrad Morris29 Apr 2009, 18:3010634g8102
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITJames N Wilson29 Apr 2009, 15:567434g8101
Casio fx-115ms calculator usage correctionsJ Cora29 Apr 2009, 14:3211799g8100
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITBrad Morris29 Apr 2009, 12:5718407g8099
Re: Latitude by Noon Sun for BeginnersJean-Philippe Planas29 Apr 2009, 09:1522180g8098
Re: Latitude by Noon Sun for BeginnersGary LaPook29 Apr 2009, 08:3021451g8097
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITGeorge Huxtable29 Apr 2009, 06:306481g8096
Re: The rapid-fire fixFrank Reed29 Apr 2009, 06:205797g8095
Re: Latitude by Noon Sun for BeginnersGary LaPook29 Apr 2009, 03:4713084g8094
Re: Henry's equal altitudesHenry Halboth29 Apr 2009, 03:1915431g8093
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITJames N Wilson29 Apr 2009, 00:331447657g8092
Re: Latitude by Noon Sun for BeginnersHenry Halboth29 Apr 2009, 00:2811978g8091
Re: Latitude by Noon Sun for BeginnersBrad Morris29 Apr 2009, 00:266412g8090
Latitude by Noon Sun for BeginnersJ Parsons28 Apr 2009, 15:497953g8089
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITGeorge Huxtable28 Apr 2009, 16:2811413g8088
Re: One-body fixPeter Hakel28 Apr 2009, 10:1410747g8087
Methods for calculating local Mean TimeKent Nordström28 Apr 2009, 10:399650g8086
Re: The rapid-fire fixGeorge Huxtable28 Apr 2009, 09:4421826g8085
Re: The Frank Reed School of NavigationBill B28 Apr 2009, 06:247580g8084
Re: Lat/Long by Noon SunGeorge Huxtable27 Apr 2009, 22:517043g8083
Re: Lat/Long by Noon SunGary LaPook27 Apr 2009, 22:157066g8082
Re: One-body fixJohn Karl27 Apr 2009, 21:595457g8081
Re: The rapid-fire fixJohn Karl27 Apr 2009, 21:395796g8080
Brandis SextantGary LaPook27 Apr 2009, 21:264362g8079
Re: Ming dynasty junk sails to North America and backJ Cora27 Apr 2009, 16:388878g8078
Ming dynasty junk sails to North America and backPeter Fogg27 Apr 2009, 16:079885g8077
Re: One-body fixGeorge Huxtable27 Apr 2009, 14:586905g8076
Re: The Frank Reed School of NavigationMike Bowman27 Apr 2009, 11:065121g8075
Re: husun sextantMike Bowman27 Apr 2009, 11:014961g8074
Re: Lat/Long by Noon SunGeorge Huxtable27 Apr 2009, 08:497840g8073
Re: One-body fixGeoffrey Kolbe27 Apr 2009, 06:009171g8072
Re: husun sextantBill Morris27 Apr 2009, 03:286654g8071
Re: husun sextantGreg Rudzinski27 Apr 2009, 03:195061g8070
Re: Lat/Long by Noon SunGary LaPook27 Apr 2009, 01:1111646g8069
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITJames N Wilson27 Apr 2009, 00:548411g8068
Husun sextantkrispal26 Apr 2009, 21:094504g8067
One-body fix, clarificationPeter Hakel26 Apr 2009, 20:128558g8066
One-body fixPeter Hakel26 Apr 2009, 18:1110867g8065
Re: The Frank Reed School of NavigationRichard M Pisko26 Apr 2009, 23:536437g8064
Re: fix from repeated observation: was Re: Coriolis vsNoon curve correctionJeremy C26 Apr 2009, 22:215967g8063
Re: fix from repeated observation: was Re: Coriolis vsNoon curve correctionGeorge Huxtable26 Apr 2009, 20:0211828g8062
Re: Henry's equal altitudesDave Walden26 Apr 2009, 14:41470976g8061
Re: Coriolis vs Noon curve correctionJeremy C26 Apr 2009, 14:046676g8060
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITGeorge Huxtable26 Apr 2009, 09:4836133g8059
Re: The Frank Reed School of NavigationLu Abel26 Apr 2009, 06:4810557g8058
On filling in the map as you go (The tale of anotherFrank)Peter Fogg26 Apr 2009, 05:4914342g8057
The Frank Reed School of NavigationFrank Reed26 Apr 2009, 05:299408g8056
Henry's equal altitudesFrank Reed26 Apr 2009, 04:54526680g8055
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITJames N Wilson26 Apr 2009, 04:119495g8054
Coriolis vs Noon curve correctionFrank Reed26 Apr 2009, 03:468005g8053
Re: The rapid-fire fixJeremy C26 Apr 2009, 03:255329g8052
Re: Refraction correctionFrank Reed26 Apr 2009, 03:138201g8051
Re: Transcription of Worsley's LogFrank Reed26 Apr 2009, 02:588241g8050
The rapid-fire fixFrank Reed26 Apr 2009, 02:1615786g8049
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITGeorge Huxtable25 Apr 2009, 22:3748724g8048
Re: lat/lon by noon SunJames N Wilson25 Apr 2009, 22:149055g8047
Re: lat/lon by noon SunPeter Fogg25 Apr 2009, 21:047696g8046
Lat/lon by noon SunGeorge Huxtable25 Apr 2009, 20:586537g8045
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITHewitt Schlereth25 Apr 2009, 18:266990g8044
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITJames N Wilson25 Apr 2009, 17:118005g8043
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITBrad Morris25 Apr 2009, 16:546387g8042
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITGeorge Huxtable25 Apr 2009, 16:358817g8041
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITHewitt Schlereth25 Apr 2009, 15:5043868g8040
Re: Mail adress and bubble horizonRobert Eno25 Apr 2009, 13:268749g8039
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITHewitt Schlereth25 Apr 2009, 00:427664g8038
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITBrad Morris25 Apr 2009, 00:266846g8037
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITDave Walden24 Apr 2009, 23:076226g8036
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITGeorge Huxtable24 Apr 2009, 23:0635454g8035
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITHewitt Schlereth24 Apr 2009, 21:539655g8034
Celestial Navigation Made Easy - by Francois MeyrierJ Cora24 Apr 2009, 18:4111687g8033
Mail adress and bubble horizonNavList Messages24 Apr 2009, 18:147275g8032
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITGeorge Huxtable24 Apr 2009, 16:1434587g8031
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITHewitt Schlereth24 Apr 2009, 00:4611046g8030
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITPeter Hakel23 Apr 2009, 23:4716807g8029
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITFred Hebard23 Apr 2009, 22:079985g8028
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITHewitt Schlereth23 Apr 2009, 21:5910088g8027
Re: norie's nautical tables avail for downloadGeorge Huxtable23 Apr 2009, 21:448685g8026
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITGeorge Huxtable23 Apr 2009, 18:3441294g8025
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITJames N Wilson23 Apr 2009, 17:256295g8024
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITHewitt Schlereth23 Apr 2009, 15:0329553g8023
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITGeorge Huxtable23 Apr 2009, 14:3310959g8022
Re: Artificial Horizon: Wobble is gone!Brad Morris23 Apr 2009, 02:136356g8021
Norie's nautical tables avail for downloadJ Cora22 Apr 2009, 17:517328g8020
Re: Lat/Lon by "Noon Sun" & The Noon Fix PROVE ITBrad Morris22 Apr 2009, 16:259588g8019
Artificial Horizon: Wobble is gone!J Parsons22 Apr 2009, 14:506864g8018
Re: Moon occults Venus tomorrow morningMarcel Tschudin22 Apr 2009, 08:407027g8017
Moon occults Venus tomorrow morningFrank Reed22 Apr 2009, 04:197028g8016
Re: Artificial horizon questionBrad Morris21 Apr 2009, 20:058034g8015
On finding the latitude and longitude in cloudyweatherAndrés Ruiz21 Apr 2009, 19:55351226g8014
Re: Artificial horizon questionJ Parsons21 Apr 2009, 19:338398g8013
Re: Artificial horizon questionBrad Morris21 Apr 2009, 15:3710976g8012
Re: Artificial horizon questionGeorge Huxtable21 Apr 2009, 13:218297g8011
Re: Artificial horizon questionBill Morris21 Apr 2009, 05:567620g8010
Re: Artificial horizon questionRobert Eno21 Apr 2009, 01:3210884g8009
Re: Artificial horizon questionBrad Morris21 Apr 2009, 01:106900g8008