Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Position-Finding

January, 2004

Index includes 405 messages. Sorted by message ID, in descending order.
SubjectAuthorDate (UT)SizeID
Re: VirusesKen James31 Jan 2004, 23:455117w13942
Re: Buying secondhand maritime books.Stacy Hanna31 Jan 2004, 23:243816w13940
RAF Mk 9 Bubble SextantsRobin Birch31 Jan 2004, 22:572622w13938
Sextant vernier scaleMike Burkes31 Jan 2004, 22:2623259w13936
Re: Night moon sightsPeter Fogg31 Jan 2004, 21:586052w13934
Re: Buying secondhand maritime books.Henry Halboth31 Jan 2004, 21:302732w13932
Re: Buying secondhand maritime books.William Allen31 Jan 2004, 21:279585w13930
Re: Buying secondhand maritime books.Philip Ouvry31 Jan 2004, 20:232080w13928
Sextant CalibrationFred Hebard31 Jan 2004, 19:159072w13926
Re: Buying secondhand maritime books.Will O´Neil31 Jan 2004, 17:342927w13924
Second Hand BooksMike Burkes31 Jan 2004, 17:313739w13922
Re: Re Usna TextsJared Sherman31 Jan 2004, 17:242423w13920
Re: Re Usna TextsStacy Hanna31 Jan 2004, 16:2224205w13918
Re: Buying secondhand maritime books. Was: How was GMT originallyestablished ?Glendon31 Jan 2004, 15:023627w13916
Re: VirusesGuus Dekker31 Jan 2004, 12:252671w13914
Re: Comparison of navigation handheld calcuatorsJoel Jacobs31 Jan 2004, 12:134523w13912
VirusesGlendon31 Jan 2004, 12:095284w13910
Re: Re Usna TextsPaul Marcuzzo31 Jan 2004, 11:5414512w13908
Re: Cel Nav at USNAPaul Marcuzzo31 Jan 2004, 11:5411705w13906
Comparison of navigation handheld calcuatorsJim Thompson31 Jan 2004, 11:303006w13904
Re: Buying secondhand maritime books. Was: How was GMT originallyestablished ?Joel Jacobs31 Jan 2004, 09:557209w13902
Buying secondhand maritime books. Was: How was GMT originallyestablished ?George Huxtable31 Jan 2004, 09:355815w13900
Re: Night moon sightsFrank Reed31 Jan 2004, 08:104631w13898
Re: More Nc HistoryJoel Jacobs31 Jan 2004, 02:306866w13896
Re: Silicon Sea Leg 88 questionsJoel Jacobs31 Jan 2004, 01:514977w13894
Re: Silicon Sea Leg 88 questionsJoel Jacobs31 Jan 2004, 01:414324w13892
Re: Night shots useing refected lightJoel Jacobs31 Jan 2004, 01:148348w13890
Re: Silicon Sea Leg 88 questionsGlendon31 Jan 2004, 01:133104w13888
Re: Silicon Sea Leg 88 questionsJoel Jacobs30 Jan 2004, 23:595871w13886
Re: Night shots useing refected lightDoug Royer30 Jan 2004, 23:534313w13884
Re: Night moon sightsJared Sherman30 Jan 2004, 23:512267w13882
Re: Night moon sightsGeorge Huxtable30 Jan 2004, 23:422055w13880
Re: How was GMT originally established ?William Allen30 Jan 2004, 23:2910594w13878
Re: Night moon sightsFrank Reed30 Jan 2004, 23:273331w13876
Re: Night shots useing refected lightJoel Jacobs30 Jan 2004, 23:163424w13874
Re: Night moon sightsDoug Royer30 Jan 2004, 22:479474w13872
Re: Night moon sightsFrank Reed30 Jan 2004, 22:267634w13870
Re: Night moon sightsGary Harkins30 Jan 2004, 22:094714w13868
Re: Night moon sightsTrevor Kenchington30 Jan 2004, 21:172385w13866
Re: Night moon sightsTrevor Kenchington30 Jan 2004, 21:145869w13864
Night shots useing refected lightDoug Royer30 Jan 2004, 20:552800w13862
Re Usna TextsJoel Jacobs30 Jan 2004, 20:187270w13860
Re: Celnav At The Usna And MoreJoel Jacobs30 Jan 2004, 19:563826w13858
Re: Night moon sightsPeter Fogg30 Jan 2004, 19:054815w13856
Re: Night moon sightsFrank Reed30 Jan 2004, 18:254749w13854
Re: Cel Nav at USNADoug Royer30 Jan 2004, 17:295929w13852
Night moon sightsPeter Fogg30 Jan 2004, 16:433188w13850
Re: Cel Nav at USNARodney Myrvaagnes30 Jan 2004, 16:205069w13848
Re: Silicon Sea Leg 88 questionsPeter Fogg30 Jan 2004, 16:105204w13846
Re: Celnav At The Usna And MoreJared Sherman30 Jan 2004, 15:132625w13844
Cel Nav at USNAAndrew Corl30 Jan 2004, 15:114633w13842
Re: Celnav At The Usna And MoreJoel Jacobs30 Jan 2004, 14:4326299w13840
Re: How was GMT originally established ?George Huxtable30 Jan 2004, 11:339832w13838
Re: How was GMT originally established ?William Allen30 Jan 2004, 04:5210560w13836
Re: FW: Parallactic RetardationRodney Myrvaagnes30 Jan 2004, 04:262598w13834
Re: Brass vs Bronze for sextants [Was: Hooke's QuadrantJared Sherman29 Jan 2004, 22:402351w13832
Re: Celnav At The Usna And MoreStacy Hanna29 Jan 2004, 22:3421556w13830
Re: Brass vs Bronze for sextants [Was: Hooke's QuadrantKieran Kelly29 Jan 2004, 22:046309w13828
Re: How was GMT originally established ?Frank Reed29 Jan 2004, 21:503014w13826
Re: How was GMT originally established ?George Huxtable29 Jan 2004, 21:379588w13824
Celnav At The Usna And MoreJoel Jacobs29 Jan 2004, 20:539313w13822
FW: Parallactic RetardationDoug Royer29 Jan 2004, 20:443631w13820
Re: Parallactic RetardationRodney Myrvaagnes29 Jan 2004, 18:493471w13818
Re: Parallactic RetardationRodney Myrvaagnes29 Jan 2004, 18:492387w13816
Re: How was GMT originally established ?Patrick Stanistreet29 Jan 2004, 16:476458w13814
Re: Bowditch onlineJared Sherman29 Jan 2004, 16:152453w13812
Re: Brass vs Bronze for sextants [Was: Hooke's QuadrantJared Sherman29 Jan 2004, 16:122860w13810
Re: How was GMT originally established ?Fred Hebard29 Jan 2004, 15:117527w13808
Re: Parallactic RetardationGeorge Huxtable29 Jan 2004, 14:404182w13806
Re: How was GMT originally established ?Thomas Schmidt29 Jan 2004, 10:566551w13804
Re: Brass vs Bronze for sextants [Was: Hooke's QuadrantKieran Kelly29 Jan 2004, 05:2412757w13802
Re: Hooke's QuadrantRodney Myrvaagnes29 Jan 2004, 04:423068w13800
Re: Bowditch onlineDan Allen29 Jan 2004, 02:152331w13798
Re: How was GMT originally established ?Brooke Clarke29 Jan 2004, 01:0912744w13796
Re: Brass vs Bronze for sextants [Was: Hooke's QuadrantWill O´Neil29 Jan 2004, 00:559061w13794
Re: Parallactic RetardationFrank Reed29 Jan 2004, 00:556323w13792
Re: How was GMT originally established ?Patrick Stanistreet29 Jan 2004, 00:385684w13790
Re: How was GMT originally established ?Brooke Clarke29 Jan 2004, 00:113762w13788
Re: How was GMT originally established ?Thomas Schmidt29 Jan 2004, 00:045054w13786
Re: Parallactic RetardationGeorge Huxtable28 Jan 2004, 23:434929w13784
Hooke's QuadrantKieran Kelly28 Jan 2004, 23:304382w13782
Re: How was GMT originally established ?Jim Thompson28 Jan 2004, 23:062094w13780
Re: spherical right triangles, napiers circleWilliam Allen28 Jan 2004, 23:065766w13778
How was GMT originally established ?Patrick Stanistreet28 Jan 2004, 22:492648w13776
Re: spherical right triangles, napiers circlePatrick Stanistreet28 Jan 2004, 22:345543w13774
Revised Nav-l Welcome MessageDan Hogan28 Jan 2004, 22:296829w13772
Bowditch online [was] Re: DIY plotting chartsJared Sherman28 Jan 2004, 22:064566w13770
Re: spherical right triangles, napiers circleGeorge Huxtable28 Jan 2004, 21:432295w13768
Parallactic Retardation - is it a virus?Bill Noyce28 Jan 2004, 20:362920w13766
Re: spherical right triangles, napiers circleDave Weilacher28 Jan 2004, 20:135744w13764
Re: spherical right triangles, napiers circleGeorge Huxtable28 Jan 2004, 19:324738w13762
Re: DIY plotting chartsJoel Jacobs28 Jan 2004, 18:113248w13760
Re: DIY plotting chartsHenry Halboth28 Jan 2004, 16:552647w13758
Spherical right triangles, napiers circlePatrick Stanistreet28 Jan 2004, 15:572511w13756
Re: DIY plotting chartsAndrew Corl28 Jan 2004, 15:192068w13754
Re: DIY plotting chartsDavid Martin28 Jan 2004, 15:123613w13752
Nav-L Web Page & DownloadsDan Hogan28 Jan 2004, 14:242094w13750
Re: DIY plotting chartsCourtney Thomas28 Jan 2004, 13:304883w13748
Re: DIY plotting chartsJoel Jacobs28 Jan 2004, 06:214620w13746
Re: DIY plotting chartsCourtney Thomas28 Jan 2004, 04:493177w13744
DIY plotting chartsAnthony Cappiello28 Jan 2004, 04:073548w13742
Thanks for all your response Sseas 88Renee Mattie28 Jan 2004, 03:123032w13740
Re: DIY plotting chartsDoug Royer28 Jan 2004, 01:493057w13738
DIY plotting chartsMurray Campbell28 Jan 2004, 01:302121w13736
Re: Silicon Sea Leg 88 questionsBill Noyce27 Jan 2004, 15:352964w13734
History of CN: TimelineJim Thompson27 Jan 2004, 12:582569w13732
Another navigation storyFrank Reed27 Jan 2004, 01:4213610w13730
Re: A navigation storyPhilip Ouvry27 Jan 2004, 00:563798w13728
Re: Silicon Sea Leg 88 questionsPeter Fogg27 Jan 2004, 00:0612377w13726
Re: A navigation storyRodney Myrvaagnes26 Jan 2004, 04:182324w13724
A navigation storyFred Hebard26 Jan 2004, 01:542770w13722
Re: Latitude AND Longitude by Noon SunStacy Hanna25 Jan 2004, 23:475095w13720
Re: Latitude AND Longitude by Noon SunJim Thompson25 Jan 2004, 23:313878w13718
Re: Uss Lamoure CountyStacy Hanna25 Jan 2004, 23:274165w13716
Re: Latitude AND Longitude by Noon Sun+GPSKieran Kelly25 Jan 2004, 23:274500w13714
Re: Latitude AND Longitude by Noon SunJim Thompson25 Jan 2004, 23:1412475w13712
Fw: Re: Uss Lamoure CountyJoel Jacobs25 Jan 2004, 23:044487w13710
Fw: Re: Uss Lamoure CountyJoel Jacobs25 Jan 2004, 23:033740w13708
Re: Uss Lamoure CountyJoel Jacobs25 Jan 2004, 22:555280w13706
Re: Latitude AND Longitude by Noon Sun+GPSJared Sherman25 Jan 2004, 22:352250w13704
Re: Uss Lamoure CountyJared Sherman25 Jan 2004, 22:282064w13702
Re: Uss Lamoure CountyJared Sherman25 Jan 2004, 22:263073w13700
Re: Latitude AND Longitude by Noon Sun+GPSFrank Reed25 Jan 2004, 20:567522w13698
Re: Uss Lamoure CountyJoel Jacobs25 Jan 2004, 20:394901w13696
Re: Latitude AND Longitude by Noon SunGeorge Huxtable25 Jan 2004, 20:366802w13694
Re: Latitude AND Longitude by Noon SunStacy Hanna25 Jan 2004, 19:213350w13692
Re: Latitude AND Longitude by Noon SunJared Sherman25 Jan 2004, 18:512648w13690
Re: Latitude AND Longitude by Noon SunGeorge Huxtable25 Jan 2004, 18:058710w13688
Re: Cel Nav at USNAStacy Hanna25 Jan 2004, 17:443146w13686
Cel Nav at USNAKen Gebhart25 Jan 2004, 17:302028w13684
Re: Latitude AND Longitude by Noon SunJoel Jacobs25 Jan 2004, 15:4069822w13682
Re: Latitude AND Longitude by Noon Sun+GPSRodney Myrvaagnes25 Jan 2004, 15:308165w13680
Re: Latitude AND Longitude by Noon SunStacy Hanna25 Jan 2004, 15:1460611w13678
Re: Latitude AND Longitude by Noon SunJoel Jacobs25 Jan 2004, 12:4055247w13676
Re: Latitude AND Longitude by Noon SunJoel Jacobs25 Jan 2004, 12:3716788w13674
SIlicon Sea Aechive: ssea.zipDan Hogan25 Jan 2004, 05:491738w13672
THE WEB PAGE is upDan Hogan25 Jan 2004, 04:391939w13670
Re: Latitude AND Longitude by Noon SunStacy Hanna25 Jan 2004, 03:3347719w13668
Re: Latitude AND Longitude by Noon Sun+GPSKieran Kelly25 Jan 2004, 03:0714275w13666
It's Game DayFrank Reed24 Jan 2004, 22:292701w13664
About Lunars, Part 4bGeorge Huxtable24 Jan 2004, 21:2131473w13662
Update to Part 4 of "About Lunars"George Huxtable24 Jan 2004, 21:213161w13660
Re: Latitude AND Longitude by Noon SunJim Thompson24 Jan 2004, 20:576127w13658
Re: Latitude AND Longitude by Noon SunFrank Reed24 Jan 2004, 20:3610091w13656
Z-correction using HO 229 & 249Dave Weilacher24 Jan 2004, 13:475469w13654
Re: Latitude AND Longitude by Noon SunJoel Jacobs24 Jan 2004, 12:5221019w13652
Re: Latitude AND Longitude by Noon SunGeorge Huxtable24 Jan 2004, 08:232249w13650
Re: Latitude AND Longitude by Noon SunFrank Reed24 Jan 2004, 03:282665w13648
Re: Latitude AND Longitude by Noon SunGeorge Huxtable24 Jan 2004, 00:562890w13646
Re: Timed Noon sights for positionGeorge Huxtable24 Jan 2004, 00:282259w13644
Latitude AND Longitude by Noon SunFrank Reed23 Jan 2004, 23:5713555w13642
Re: Timed Noon sights for positionJoel Jacobs23 Jan 2004, 19:172862w13640
Re: Timed Noon sights for positionBill Noyce23 Jan 2004, 18:392724w13638
Re: Timed Noon sights for positionGeorge Huxtable23 Jan 2004, 18:382215w13636
Re: Timed Noon sights for positionDoug Royer23 Jan 2004, 18:243979w13634
Web PageDan Hogan23 Jan 2004, 17:231791w13632
Re: Timed Noon sights for positionJoel Jacobs23 Jan 2004, 13:5510805w13630
Re: Timed Noon sights for positionBill Noyce23 Jan 2004, 13:512827w13628
Re: Timed Noon sights for positionGeorge Huxtable23 Jan 2004, 13:349875w13626
Re: Timed Noon sights for positionBill Noyce23 Jan 2004, 13:303424w13624
Web PageDan Hogan23 Jan 2004, 02:041802w13622
Re: Timed Noon sights for positionDoug Royer23 Jan 2004, 00:514855w13620
Re: Timed Noon sights for positionFred Hebard23 Jan 2004, 00:402605w13618
Re: Timed Noon sights for positionBob Young23 Jan 2004, 00:213850w13616
Re: Timed Noon sights for positionDoug Royer22 Jan 2004, 23:254449w13614
Re: Timed Noon sights for positionFred Hebard22 Jan 2004, 22:112840w13612
Re: Timed Noon sights for positionJoel Jacobs22 Jan 2004, 21:585135w13610
Re: Timed Noon sights for positionBill Noyce22 Jan 2004, 21:463651w13608
Re: Timed Noon sights for positionFred Hebard22 Jan 2004, 21:422644w13606
Silicon Sea Leg 88 questionsRenee Mattie22 Jan 2004, 21:116381w13604
Re: Timed Noon sights for positionBill Noyce22 Jan 2004, 21:074722w13602
Re: Timed Noon sights for positionDoug Royer22 Jan 2004, 19:475449w13600
Re: Beta Cap -- the tenth lunars starFrank Reed22 Jan 2004, 16:174886w13598
Re: The Old vs. The NewJim Thompson22 Jan 2004, 11:409515w13596
Re: Lunar new year - questionZorbec Legras22 Jan 2004, 11:052895w13594
Lunar new year - questionAubrey O´Callaghan22 Jan 2004, 10:272673w13592
Re: The Old vs. The NewFrank Reed22 Jan 2004, 03:069278w13590
Re: The Old vs. The NewFrank Reed22 Jan 2004, 02:2910114w13588
Re: Timed Noon sights for positionDoug Royer21 Jan 2004, 23:064389w13586
Re: Timed Noon sights for positionJoel Jacobs21 Jan 2004, 22:233911w13584
Re: Timed Noon sights for positionDoug Royer21 Jan 2004, 22:093248w13582
Re: Timed Noon sights for positionTrevor Kenchington21 Jan 2004, 22:053765w13580
Re: Timed Noon sights for positionBill Noyce21 Jan 2004, 21:332874w13578
Re: Timed Noon sights for positionJoel Jacobs21 Jan 2004, 21:077891w13576
Timed Noon sights for positionDoug Royer21 Jan 2004, 20:396830w13574
Re: Beta Cap -- the tenth lunars starJim Thompson21 Jan 2004, 10:116116w13572
Re: The Old vs. The NewChuck Taylor21 Jan 2004, 04:363638w13570
List Distribution Problem??Frank Reed21 Jan 2004, 03:452768w13568
Re: Beta Cap -- the tenth lunars starFrank Reed21 Jan 2004, 03:423755w13566
Re: Beta Cap -- the tenth lunars starJared Sherman21 Jan 2004, 03:132383w13564
Re: Beta Cap -- the tenth lunars starDan Allen21 Jan 2004, 02:122240w13562
Beta Cap -- the tenth lunars starFrank Reed21 Jan 2004, 01:153258w13560
Bubble sextant MK9 repairHein Kloos20 Jan 2004, 22:394136w13558
Re: The Old vs. The NewGeoffrey Butt20 Jan 2004, 20:545788w13556
Re: The Old vs. The NewDan Allen20 Jan 2004, 04:472724w13554
Latitude by Moon in 1847Frank Reed19 Jan 2004, 23:423518w13552
Re: The Old vs. The NewFrank Reed19 Jan 2004, 23:323264w13550
Re: Time and the BBCCliff Sojourner19 Jan 2004, 19:132896w13548
Re: Full and by, was: Latitude by SpicaBruce Stark19 Jan 2004, 18:223307w13546
Re: Time and the BBCGeoffrey Butt19 Jan 2004, 17:4410727w13544
Re: Time and the BBCAubrey O´Callaghan19 Jan 2004, 15:337136w13542
Re: Time and the BBCJared Sherman19 Jan 2004, 14:492251w13540
Time and the BBCAndrew Corl19 Jan 2004, 13:216807w13538
Re: The Old vs. The NewDan Allen19 Jan 2004, 02:463607w13536
Re: Lunars on the Cicero (1827)Frank Reed19 Jan 2004, 00:452484w13534
Lunars on the Cicero (1827)Frank Reed19 Jan 2004, 00:405284w13532
The Old vs. The NewFrank Reed19 Jan 2004, 00:197720w13530
Re: [Sextants] Plath Sextant: Advice - Required.Kieran Kelly18 Jan 2004, 21:533126w13528
Re: Plath Sextant: Advice - Required.Fred Hebard18 Jan 2004, 21:183075w13526
Re: Plath Sextant: Advice - Required.Kieran Kelly18 Jan 2004, 10:528540w13524
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesGeorge Huxtable17 Jan 2004, 22:369114w13522
Full and by, was: Latitude by SpicaTrevor Kenchington17 Jan 2004, 22:053830w13520
Re: Plath Sextant: Advice - Required.George Huxtable17 Jan 2004, 19:144705w13518
Re: Plath Sextant: Advice - Required.George Huxtable17 Jan 2004, 12:359851w13516
Plath Sextant: Advice - Required.Kieran Kelly17 Jan 2004, 08:345465w13514
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesRichard M Pisko17 Jan 2004, 07:105433w13512
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesRichard M Pisko17 Jan 2004, 04:375816w13510
Job going at Greenwich.George Huxtable16 Jan 2004, 19:545247w13508
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesGeoffrey Kolbe16 Jan 2004, 08:052996w13506
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFrank Reed16 Jan 2004, 03:597041w13504
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFred Hebard16 Jan 2004, 02:473297w13502
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesJared Sherman16 Jan 2004, 02:083018w13500
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesGeorge Huxtable16 Jan 2004, 01:134064w13498
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesGeorge Huxtable16 Jan 2004, 01:132675w13496
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFred Hebard15 Jan 2004, 23:294520w13494
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesGeorge Huxtable15 Jan 2004, 22:126658w13492
A celestial sphere globe?Jim Thompson15 Jan 2004, 21:052275w13490
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesJared Sherman15 Jan 2004, 18:433404w13488
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFred Hebard15 Jan 2004, 18:013278w13486
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesGeorge Huxtable15 Jan 2004, 17:184701w13484
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesGeorge Huxtable15 Jan 2004, 17:145664w13482
Re: RES: PosplotSteve Moss15 Jan 2004, 15:349626w13480
PosplotSteve Moss15 Jan 2004, 12:582771w13478
RES: PosplotJosé Otavio O. de Almeida15 Jan 2004, 12:424108w13476
Re: Latitude by Spica/the NAV L listGeorge Huxtable15 Jan 2004, 10:073540w13474
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesRichard M Pisko15 Jan 2004, 04:416628w13472
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesJared Sherman15 Jan 2004, 02:107531w13470
Re: Latitude by Spica/the NAV L listFred Hebard14 Jan 2004, 23:474184w13468
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFred Hebard14 Jan 2004, 23:294134w13466
Re: Latitude by Spica/the NAV L listJim Thompson14 Jan 2004, 23:233301w13464
Re: Latitude by Spica/the NAV L listKieran Kelly14 Jan 2004, 22:516979w13462
Re: Slocum and van der WerfGeorge Huxtable14 Jan 2004, 22:066769w13460
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesJared Sherman14 Jan 2004, 19:153856w13458
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesJared Sherman14 Jan 2004, 19:023696w13456
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFred Hebard14 Jan 2004, 18:004920w13454
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesGeorge Huxtable14 Jan 2004, 11:526162w13452
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesGeoffrey Kolbe14 Jan 2004, 08:133175w13450
Re: Online AlmanacJim Thompson13 Jan 2004, 21:113960w13448
Online AlmanacAndrew Corl13 Jan 2004, 20:524107w13446
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesGeorge Huxtable13 Jan 2004, 19:5810902w13444
Re: Latitude by SpicaBruce Stark13 Jan 2004, 17:472717w13442
Re: Map of the "Age of the Tides"George Huxtable13 Jan 2004, 16:282620w13440
Re: Latitude by SpicaSteven Wepster13 Jan 2004, 15:413423w13438
Re: Slocum and van der WerfFred Hebard13 Jan 2004, 04:425198w13436
Re: Latitude by SpicaFrank Reed13 Jan 2004, 00:146429w13434
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFrank Reed13 Jan 2004, 00:087567w13432
Re: Map of the "Age of the Tides"Glendon12 Jan 2004, 23:305062w13430
Re: Latitude by SpicaKieran Kelly12 Jan 2004, 23:264184w13428
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesGeorge Huxtable12 Jan 2004, 23:234235w13426
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesJared Sherman12 Jan 2004, 22:395254w13424
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFred Hebard12 Jan 2004, 22:2021407w13422
Map of the "Age of the Tides"Frank Reed12 Jan 2004, 22:055680w13420
Slocum and van der WerfFrank Reed12 Jan 2004, 21:416526w13418
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFrank Reed12 Jan 2004, 21:173943w13416
Star-to-Star Sights (part 1)Frank Reed12 Jan 2004, 21:0917062w13414
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFred Hebard12 Jan 2004, 21:065188w13412
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFrank Reed12 Jan 2004, 20:324776w13410
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFred Hebard12 Jan 2004, 18:134563w13408
Re: Latitude by SpicaBruce Stark12 Jan 2004, 18:072024w13406
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesGeorge Huxtable12 Jan 2004, 10:463689w13404
Re: Latitude by SpicaGeorge Huxtable12 Jan 2004, 10:464415w13402
Re: Latitude by SpicaFrank Reed12 Jan 2004, 09:007143w13400
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesRichard M Pisko12 Jan 2004, 08:169737w13398
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFred Hebard12 Jan 2004, 05:092466w13396
Re: Latitude by SpicaKieran Kelly12 Jan 2004, 04:144215w13394
Re: Latitude by SpicaJim Thompson12 Jan 2004, 03:513724w13392
Latitude by SpicaFrank Reed12 Jan 2004, 01:403855w13390
Re: Parallactic retardation - don't give up so easily.George Huxtable11 Jan 2004, 21:205083w13388
Re: Parallactic retardation - don't give up so easily.Fred Hebard10 Jan 2004, 23:44229481w13386
Re: Parallactic retardation - don't give up so easily.George Huxtable10 Jan 2004, 23:063250w13384
Re: Parallactic retardation - don't give up so easily.George Huxtable10 Jan 2004, 23:053516w13382
Re: Parallactic retardation - don't give up so easily.Jared Sherman10 Jan 2004, 17:382763w13380
Re: Parallactic retardation - don't give up so easily.Jared Sherman10 Jan 2004, 17:333502w13378
Re: Parallactic retardation - don't give up so easily.Bruce Stark10 Jan 2004, 16:212317w13376
Re: Parallactic retardation - don't give up so easily.George Huxtable10 Jan 2004, 11:318503w13374
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesGeorge Huxtable10 Jan 2004, 00:454901w13372
Re: Parallactic retardation - don't give up so easily.Bruce Stark9 Jan 2004, 23:292258w13370
Re: Parallactic retardation - don't give up so easily.Frank Reed9 Jan 2004, 23:004526w13368
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesJared Sherman9 Jan 2004, 22:584061w13366
Re: Parallactic retardation - don't give up so easily.Frank Reed9 Jan 2004, 22:486372w13364
Re: Parallactic retardation - don't give up so easily.Bruce Stark9 Jan 2004, 22:223197w13362
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesGeorge Huxtable9 Jan 2004, 20:514489w13360
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesBruce Stark9 Jan 2004, 20:393113w13358
Re: Parallactic retardation - don't give up so easily.George Huxtable9 Jan 2004, 19:442967w13356
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesJared Sherman9 Jan 2004, 19:422413w13354
Re: C.Plath Navistar Professional sextant partsJared Sherman9 Jan 2004, 19:402701w13352
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFred Hebard9 Jan 2004, 19:275178w13350
C.Plath Navistar Professional sextant partsAnthony Cappiello9 Jan 2004, 19:083560w13348
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFred Hebard9 Jan 2004, 18:303207w13346
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesGeorge Huxtable9 Jan 2004, 17:456950w13344
Re: Parallactic retardation - don't give up so easily.Fred Hebard9 Jan 2004, 17:333246w13342
Re: Parallactic retardation - don't give up so easily.Bill Noyce9 Jan 2004, 13:493595w13340
Re: Measuring time in small boat CN: what devices do yourecommend?Richard B. Langley9 Jan 2004, 12:144443w13338
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFrank Reed9 Jan 2004, 07:423481w13336
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFrank Reed9 Jan 2004, 07:296893w13334
Re: Measuring time in small boat CN: what devices do yourecommend?Jared Sherman9 Jan 2004, 03:212616w13332
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFred Hebard9 Jan 2004, 03:073015w13330
Re: Lat + Long. @ LAN explainationJim Thompson9 Jan 2004, 01:362968w13328
Re: Measuring time in small boat CN: what devices do yourecommend?Rodney Myrvaagnes9 Jan 2004, 01:182816w13326
Re: LAN on MarsCliff Sojourner9 Jan 2004, 00:342679w13324
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesGeorge Huxtable9 Jan 2004, 00:286391w13322
LAN on MarsFrank Reed8 Jan 2004, 23:413045w13320
Re: Fw: Lat. and Lon at LANFrank Reed8 Jan 2004, 23:134104w13318
Lat + Long. @ LAN explainationDoug Royer8 Jan 2004, 23:093100w13316
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFrank Reed8 Jan 2004, 23:025630w13314
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFrank Reed8 Jan 2004, 22:515496w13312
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFred Hebard8 Jan 2004, 22:463919w13310
Re: LAN at higher lattitudesChuck Taylor8 Jan 2004, 22:362693w13308
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFrank Reed8 Jan 2004, 22:255096w13306
Re: LAN at higher lattitudesGeorge Huxtable8 Jan 2004, 22:245637w13304
Re: New Moon, Perigee, and SolsticeFrank Reed8 Jan 2004, 22:133926w13302
Re: Measuring time in small boat CNMurray Campbell8 Jan 2004, 20:401706w13300
Re: Measuring time in small boat CN: what devices do yourecommend?Chuck Taylor8 Jan 2004, 20:362436w13298
LAN at higher lattitudesMurray Campbell8 Jan 2004, 20:352193w13296
Re: Measuring time in small boat CNPaul Hirose8 Jan 2004, 20:053764w13294
Re: Measuring time in small boat CN: what devices do yourecommend?Rodney Myrvaagnes8 Jan 2004, 19:563514w13292
Re: Measuring time in small boat CN: what devices do yourecommend?Jim Thompson8 Jan 2004, 19:142436w13290
Re: Time on a small boat CNJim Thompson8 Jan 2004, 19:124082w13288
Re: Measuring time in small boat CN: what devices do yourecommend?Chuck Taylor8 Jan 2004, 18:492429w13286
Re: Time on a small boat CNRHT8 Jan 2004, 18:343072w13284
Re: Time on a small boat CNDavid Martin8 Jan 2004, 17:453026w13282
Re: Lat. and Lon at LANGeorge Huxtable8 Jan 2004, 17:073663w13280
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesGeorge Huxtable8 Jan 2004, 17:072390w13278
Re: Measuring time in small boat CN: what devices do yourecommend?Rodney Myrvaagnes8 Jan 2004, 16:112764w13276
Re: Time on a small boat CNRHT8 Jan 2004, 15:412583w13274
Re: Time on a small boat CNJared Sherman8 Jan 2004, 15:242577w13272
Re: Lat. and Lon at LANFred Hebard8 Jan 2004, 15:102652w13270
Re: Fw: Lat. and Lon at LANGeorge Huxtable8 Jan 2004, 14:388481w13268
Fw: Lat. and Lon at LANDick Savage8 Jan 2004, 07:057267w13266
Time on a small boat CNDick Savage8 Jan 2004, 06:149269w13264
Lewis and Clark etcDick Savage8 Jan 2004, 05:204898w13262
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFred Hebard8 Jan 2004, 02:531981w13260
Re: Measuring time in small boat CN: what devices do yourecommend?Chuck Taylor8 Jan 2004, 01:343503w13258
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesGeorge Huxtable7 Jan 2004, 22:502719w13256
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesGeorge Huxtable7 Jan 2004, 20:405575w13254
Re: Evolution of the Fundy TidesJared Sherman7 Jan 2004, 18:253402w13252
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFred Hebard7 Jan 2004, 13:422664w13250
Re: New Moon, Perigee, and SolsticeGeorge Huxtable7 Jan 2004, 13:364862w13248
Re: Windows program to reduce sights....Michael Dorl7 Jan 2004, 11:523259w13246
Measuring time in small boat CN: what devices do you recommend?Jim Thompson7 Jan 2004, 10:523265w13244
Re: Whaleship Stonington's LunarsFrank Reed7 Jan 2004, 09:504067w13242
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFrank Reed7 Jan 2004, 09:504740w13240
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFrank Reed7 Jan 2004, 09:507660w13238
Re: New Moon, Perigee, and SolsticeFrank Reed7 Jan 2004, 09:5010190w13236
Re: New Moon, Perigee, and SolsticeFrank Reed7 Jan 2004, 09:507969w13234
Re: Whaleship Stonington's LunarsFrank Reed7 Jan 2004, 09:506205w13232
Re: New Moon, Perigee, and SolsticeFrank Reed7 Jan 2004, 09:504220w13230
Re: Evolution of the Fundy TidesFrank Reed7 Jan 2004, 09:507043w13228
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFrank Reed7 Jan 2004, 09:505428w13226
Re: Windows program to reduce sights....Stan K7 Jan 2004, 03:472352w13224
Re: 6 1/2 years of NAV-L and Tony SeverdiaStan K7 Jan 2004, 03:474398w13222
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesGeorge Huxtable6 Jan 2004, 22:402682w13220
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesGeorge Huxtable6 Jan 2004, 21:414696w13218
Re: Lewis and Clark, and the clocks and watches of their era.George Huxtable6 Jan 2004, 21:085467w13216
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFred Hebard6 Jan 2004, 20:444152w13214
Windows program to reduce sights....Michael Dorl6 Jan 2004, 20:394889w13212
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesBill Noyce6 Jan 2004, 20:193691w13210
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesJan Kalivoda6 Jan 2004, 19:545247w13208
Re: 6 1/2 years of NAV-LDan Hogan6 Jan 2004, 19:542543w13206
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesGeorge Huxtable6 Jan 2004, 19:354454w13204
Re: Lewis and Clark, and the clocks and watches of their era.Ken Muldrew6 Jan 2004, 18:034100w13202
Re: 6 1/2 years of NAV-LChuck Taylor6 Jan 2004, 17:511968w13200
Re: 6 1/2 years of NAV-LRodney Myrvaagnes6 Jan 2004, 17:383001w13198
Re: 6 1/2 years of NAV-LGeorge Huxtable6 Jan 2004, 17:113957w13196
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesBill Noyce6 Jan 2004, 16:153168w13194
Re: Consistency v Accuracy in celestial navigationBill Noyce6 Jan 2004, 16:043870w13192
L + C,watches etc.Dick Savage6 Jan 2004, 05:389483w13190
Re: Evolution of the Fundy TidesDan Allen6 Jan 2004, 03:144775w13188
Re: Evolution of the Fundy TidesMurray Campbell6 Jan 2004, 01:492245w13186
Re: Mer. Pas.,Lat at Lan etc.Jim Thompson5 Jan 2004, 22:595452w13184
Re: Lewis and Clark, and the clocks and watches of their era.George Huxtable5 Jan 2004, 22:277005w13182
Lewis and Clark, and the clocks and watches of their era.Andrew Corl5 Jan 2004, 16:569932w13180
Re: 6 1/2 years of NAV-LPeter Smith5 Jan 2004, 14:541879w13178
Re: 6 1/2 years of NAV-LDan Allen5 Jan 2004, 03:547285w13176
Re:George Huxtable4 Jan 2004, 22:372352w13174
Another old HOAX: Re: Fw: VIRUS WARNINGJared Sherman4 Jan 2004, 21:212492w13172
Fw: Virus WarningMike Burkes4 Jan 2004, 20:539798w13170
(no subject)Dennis Koehler4 Jan 2004, 15:502460w13168
Re: 6 1/2 years of NAV-LAubrey O´Callaghan4 Jan 2004, 11:056771w13166
6 1/2 years of NAV-LDan Allen3 Jan 2004, 20:005553w13164
Evolution of the Fundy TidesTrevor Kenchington3 Jan 2004, 17:256304w13162
Sky chart and satellite dataMichael Dorl3 Jan 2004, 13:572399w13160
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesJan Kalivoda2 Jan 2004, 22:072817w13158
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFred Hebard2 Jan 2004, 21:329130w13156
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesJan Kalivoda2 Jan 2004, 19:295965w13154
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFred Hebard1 Jan 2004, 21:404587w13152
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFred Hebard1 Jan 2004, 20:236747w13150
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesJan Kalivoda1 Jan 2004, 20:175099w13148
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesJan Kalivoda1 Jan 2004, 19:085190w13146
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFred Hebard1 Jan 2004, 15:435652w13144
Lewis and Clark, and the clocks and watches of their era.George Huxtable1 Jan 2004, 15:225636w13142
Software to assist the Master in port formalities.Pawan Rao1 Jan 2004, 14:382160w13140
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesTrevor Kenchington1 Jan 2004, 12:264436w13138
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesJan Kalivoda1 Jan 2004, 01:333101w13136
Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distancesFred Hebard1 Jan 2004, 00:314582w13134

Index includes 405 messages.

NavList

What is NavList?

Join NavList

Name:
(please, no nicknames or handles)
Email:
Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
Yes No

You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

Posting Code

Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
Email:

Email Settings

Posting Code:

Custom Index

Subject:
Author:
Start date: (yyyymm dd)
End date: (yyyymm dd)

Visit this site
Visit this site
Visit this site
Visit this site
Visit this site
Visit this site