Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Position-Finding

2004

Index includes 4007 messages. Sorted by message ID, in descending order.
SubjectAuthorDate (UT)SizeID
Re: testTrevor Kenchington31 Dec 2004, 17:581925w21202
Re: testMichael Dorl31 Dec 2004, 17:102634w21200
TestFrank Reed31 Dec 2004, 08:072554w21198
Re: Navy Mark V Sextant, AccuracyPaul Hirose24 Dec 2004, 21:314849w21196
Re: Navy Mark V Sextant, AccuracyKen Gebhart24 Dec 2004, 21:074558w21194
Navy Mark V Sextant, AccuracyPeter Henry24 Dec 2004, 04:343441w21192
Re: Tamaya Venus MS-933Dan Allen23 Dec 2004, 13:592637w21190
Re: Tamaya Venus MS-933Dan Allen23 Dec 2004, 13:596376w21188
Re: Tamaya Venus MS-933Alexandre Eremenko23 Dec 2004, 12:323402w21186
FW: A card from Kumiko HattoriJoel Jacobs22 Dec 2004, 22:265006w21184
Re: Tamaya Venus MS-933Omar Reis22 Dec 2004, 20:4612126w21182
Re: Tamaya Venus MS-933Joel Jacobs22 Dec 2004, 18:2310164w21180
Re: Tamaya Venus MS-933Dan Allen22 Dec 2004, 15:259352w21178
Re: Sextants on Ebay IIFred Hebard22 Dec 2004, 13:362516w21176
Re: Sextants on Ebay IIJoel Jacobs22 Dec 2004, 13:007669w21174
Re: Tamaya Venus MS-933Joel Jacobs22 Dec 2004, 12:358138w21172
Re: Tamaya Venus MS-933Peter Smith21 Dec 2004, 18:503282w21170
Re: Old style lunarKen Muldrew21 Dec 2004, 16:273637w21168
Re: Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko21 Dec 2004, 06:463464w21166
Tamaya Venus MS-933Doug Royer21 Dec 2004, 00:372169w21164
Sextants on Ebay IIDoug Royer21 Dec 2004, 00:292775w21162
Re: Sextants on EbayJoel Jacobs20 Dec 2004, 23:408053w21160
Re: Old style lunarKen Muldrew20 Dec 2004, 22:599731w21158
Zenith PipeBrooke Clarke20 Dec 2004, 17:093840w21156
Re: Motion of GP - some rough numbersBill Noyce20 Dec 2004, 16:513628w21154
Motion of Geographical Position questionFS20 Dec 2004, 16:162758w21152
Re: Stellar Apparent Motion QuestionFS20 Dec 2004, 15:552711w21150
Re: US Naval ObservatoryDr. Gordon Anderson20 Dec 2004, 14:0014103w21148
Re: Sextants on EbayAlexandre Eremenko20 Dec 2004, 12:373455w21146
Re: Stellar Apparent Motion QuestionGeorge Huxtable19 Dec 2004, 23:416378w21144
Stellar Apparent Motion QuestionFS19 Dec 2004, 20:062885w21142
Re: US Naval ObservatoryFred Hebard19 Dec 2004, 14:192696w21140
US Naval ObservatoryClive Sutherland19 Dec 2004, 10:534951w21138
Re: Sea crossing in ancient timesTrevor Kenchington19 Dec 2004, 00:474600w21136
Re: Sea crossing in ancient timesJared Sherman18 Dec 2004, 20:182855w21134
Sea crossing in ancient timesPeter Fogg18 Dec 2004, 18:5311698w21132
Plan for navigationPeter Fogg18 Dec 2004, 04:595795w21130
Sextants on EbayDoug Royer17 Dec 2004, 01:393625w21128
Re: Old style lunarKen Muldrew16 Dec 2004, 17:153606w21126
Re: Old style lunarKen Muldrew16 Dec 2004, 17:013094w21124
Re: Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko16 Dec 2004, 14:503494w21122
Re: Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko16 Dec 2004, 14:412703w21120
Re: Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko16 Dec 2004, 14:382759w21118
Re: Old style lunarKieran Kelly16 Dec 2004, 08:432774w21116
Re: Old style lunarKen Muldrew16 Dec 2004, 06:343431w21114
Re: Old style lunarKen Muldrew16 Dec 2004, 06:276021w21112
Re: Old AlmanacsFrank Reed16 Dec 2004, 05:273411w21110
Re: Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko16 Dec 2004, 04:474402w21108
Re: Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko16 Dec 2004, 04:323714w21106
Re: Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko16 Dec 2004, 04:074739w21104
Re: Old style lunarKen Muldrew15 Dec 2004, 22:125102w21102
Re: Old AlmanacsAlexandre Eremenko15 Dec 2004, 21:343257w21100
Re: Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko15 Dec 2004, 21:283965w21098
Re: Old style lunarKen Muldrew15 Dec 2004, 20:212884w21096
Re: Old AlmanacsBruce Stark15 Dec 2004, 19:582487w21094
Re: Old AlmanacsBruce Stark15 Dec 2004, 19:513067w21092
Re: Old AlmanacsCraig Scott15 Dec 2004, 19:332800w21090
Old AlmanacsBruce Stark15 Dec 2004, 18:443341w21088
Re: Old style lunarKen Muldrew15 Dec 2004, 18:373742w21086
Re: Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko15 Dec 2004, 17:393677w21084
Re: Old style lunarKen Muldrew14 Dec 2004, 23:316813w21082
Re:       Re: Old style lunarFrank Reed14 Dec 2004, 00:003942w21080
Re: Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko13 Dec 2004, 19:115157w21078
Re: Old style lunarKen Muldrew13 Dec 2004, 17:473057w21076
Re: Old style lunarFred Hebard13 Dec 2004, 17:283044w21074
Re: Old style lunarKen Muldrew13 Dec 2004, 17:005325w21072
Re:Re:       Re: Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko13 Dec 2004, 16:103526w21070
Re: Celestial predictions. was:[NAV-L] Old style lunarGeorge Huxtable13 Dec 2004, 15:525238w21068
Re: What is it?Marvin Sebourn13 Dec 2004, 15:362964w21066
What is it?Andrew Corl13 Dec 2004, 12:474951w21064
Re:       Re: Old style lunarFrank Reed13 Dec 2004, 07:483455w21062
Re:Re:       Re: Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko13 Dec 2004, 04:533452w21060
Re: Celestial predictions. was:[NAV-L] Old style lunarFrank Reed13 Dec 2004, 00:313020w21058
Re: Celestial predictions. was:[NAV-L] Old style lunarFrank Reed13 Dec 2004, 00:2415990w21056
Re: Old style lunarFrank Reed12 Dec 2004, 21:413191w21054
Re:       Re: Old style lunarFrank Reed12 Dec 2004, 21:393945w21052
Re: Old style lunar. Sorry.Alexandre Eremenko12 Dec 2004, 06:232657w21050
Re: Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko12 Dec 2004, 06:202871w21048
Re: Celestial predictions. was:[NAV-L] Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko12 Dec 2004, 06:134306w21046
Re: Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko12 Dec 2004, 05:554414w21044
Re: Old style lunarKen Muldrew11 Dec 2004, 23:143547w21042
Re: Air travel with a sextantJared Sherman11 Dec 2004, 22:033091w21040
Celestial predictions. was:[NAV-L] Old style lunarGeorge Huxtable11 Dec 2004, 20:287312w21038
Re: Old style lunarFred Hebard11 Dec 2004, 18:184881w21036
Re:Re:       Re: Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko11 Dec 2004, 16:233078w21034
Re: Air travel with a sextantPaul Bryans11 Dec 2004, 09:513552w21032
Re:       Re: Old style lunarFrank Reed11 Dec 2004, 05:004553w21030
Re: Old style lunar (in expert hands)Alexandre Eremenko11 Dec 2004, 04:352654w21028
Re:Re:       Re: Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko11 Dec 2004, 04:333576w21026
Re: Air travel with a sextantKen Gebhart11 Dec 2004, 04:153714w21024
Re: Old style lunar (in expert hands)Fred Hebard11 Dec 2004, 03:322640w21022
Re: Old style lunar (in expert hands)Fred Hebard11 Dec 2004, 03:202435w21020
Re: Air travel with a sextantCourtney Thomas11 Dec 2004, 02:133069w21018
Re: Old style lunar (in expert hands)Frank Reed11 Dec 2004, 03:064812w21016
Re: Old style lunar (in expert hands)Frank Reed11 Dec 2004, 02:583652w21014
Re:       Re: Old style lunarFrank Reed11 Dec 2004, 02:425059w21012
Re: Old style lunar (in expert hands)Alexandre Eremenko11 Dec 2004, 02:352668w21010
Re: Old style lunar (in expert hands)Kieran Kelly24 Dec 2004, 02:292820w21008
What is this?Alexandre Eremenko11 Dec 2004, 02:272495w21006
Re: Old style lunar (in expert hands)Frank Reed11 Dec 2004, 02:243296w21004
TheodolitesGordon Talge11 Dec 2004, 02:072970w21002
Re: Old style lunar (in expert hands)Alexandre Eremenko11 Dec 2004, 01:332597w21000
Re: Air travel with a sextantAlexandre Eremenko11 Dec 2004, 01:293018w20998
Re: Old style lunar (in expert hands)Alexandre Eremenko11 Dec 2004, 01:226383w20996
Re: Air travel with a sextantNels Tomlinson11 Dec 2004, 00:272966w20994
Re: Air travel with a sextantAlexandre Eremenko11 Dec 2004, 00:253073w20992
Re: Air travel with a sextantAlexandre Eremenko11 Dec 2004, 00:192590w20990
Re:Re:       Re: Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko11 Dec 2004, 00:163493w20988
Re: Old style lunar (in expert hands)Kieran Kelly9 Dec 2004, 23:495491w20986
Re: Moon Occultation of JupiterFrank Reed10 Dec 2004, 23:444420w20984
Re: Old style lunarKen Muldrew10 Dec 2004, 22:444089w20982
Re: Air travel with a sextantJared Sherman10 Dec 2004, 22:263984w20980
Re: Air travel with a sextantJared Sherman10 Dec 2004, 22:182632w20978
Re: Air travel with a sextantJared Sherman10 Dec 2004, 22:143264w20976
Re:       Re: Old style lunarBruce Stark10 Dec 2004, 21:574657w20974
Re: Old style lunarFrank Reed10 Dec 2004, 21:074801w20972
Re: Old style lunarFrank Reed10 Dec 2004, 20:523728w20970
Re: Old style lunarFrank Reed10 Dec 2004, 20:506017w20968
Re: Old style lunarFred Hebard10 Dec 2004, 20:452521w20966
Re: Old style lunarFrank Reed10 Dec 2004, 20:363629w20964
Re: Old style lunarFred Hebard10 Dec 2004, 19:51237827w20962
Re: Air travel with a sextantCliff Sojourner10 Dec 2004, 18:292237w20960
Re: Old style lunarKen Muldrew10 Dec 2004, 18:024473w20958
Re: Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko10 Dec 2004, 16:163139w20956
Re: Old style lunar (in expert hands)Alexandre Eremenko10 Dec 2004, 15:595527w20954
Re: Air travel with a sextantPaul Bryans10 Dec 2004, 15:562533w20952
Re: Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko10 Dec 2004, 15:423178w20950
Re: Old style lunarGeorge Huxtable10 Dec 2004, 15:412289w20948
Re: Old style lunarGeorge Huxtable10 Dec 2004, 15:416214w20946
Re: Air travel with a sextantAlexandre Eremenko10 Dec 2004, 15:232803w20944
Re: Air travel with a sextantTrevor Kenchington9 Dec 2004, 20:583253w20942
Re: Old style lunarFred Hebard10 Dec 2004, 13:483227w20940
Re: Air travel with a sextantAndrew Corl10 Dec 2004, 13:385650w20938
Re: Old style lunar (in expert hands)Kieran Kelly10 Dec 2004, 11:444593w20936
Re: Air travel with a sextantPaul Bryans10 Dec 2004, 08:244322w20934
Re: A Lunar from the 1840sFrank Reed10 Dec 2004, 07:097975w20932
Re: Old style lunarFrank Reed10 Dec 2004, 06:413854w20930
Re: Old style lunarFrank Reed10 Dec 2004, 06:384218w20928
Re: Old style lunarFrank Reed10 Dec 2004, 06:314566w20926
Re: Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko10 Dec 2004, 03:592481w20924
Re: Old style lunarFred Hebard10 Dec 2004, 03:501914w20922
Re: Old style lunarFred Hebard10 Dec 2004, 03:472835w20920
Re: Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko10 Dec 2004, 02:223283w20918
Re: Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko10 Dec 2004, 02:013033w20916
Re: Old style lunarFrank Reed10 Dec 2004, 01:354760w20914
Re: Old style lunarBruce Stark10 Dec 2004, 01:183782w20912
Re: Old style lunarFrank Reed10 Dec 2004, 01:123656w20910
Re: Old style lunarFrank Reed10 Dec 2004, 01:093924w20908
Re: Old style lunarFrank Reed10 Dec 2004, 01:035714w20906
Re: Air travel with a sextantRobert Gainer10 Dec 2004, 00:502523w20904
Re: Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko10 Dec 2004, 00:283159w20902
Re: Old style lunarKen Muldrew9 Dec 2004, 23:363292w20900
Re: Old style lunarKen Muldrew9 Dec 2004, 23:145497w20898
Re: Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko9 Dec 2004, 22:482692w20896
Re: Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko9 Dec 2004, 22:414460w20894
Re: Old style lunarFred Hebard9 Dec 2004, 22:302307w20892
Re: Old style lunarFred Hebard9 Dec 2004, 22:243823w20890
Re: Old style lunarKen Muldrew9 Dec 2004, 21:243057w20888
Re: Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko9 Dec 2004, 21:094970w20886
Re: Old style lunarFrank Reed9 Dec 2004, 21:064858w20884
Re: Old style lunarKen Muldrew9 Dec 2004, 20:294721w20882
Re: Air travel with a sextantJared Sherman9 Dec 2004, 20:112911w20880
Re: Air travel with a sextantJared Sherman9 Dec 2004, 20:063815w20878
Re: Air travel with a sextantJared Sherman9 Dec 2004, 19:573236w20876
Re: Dip uncertaintyBruce Stark9 Dec 2004, 18:563092w20874
Re: Air travel with a sextantAlexandre Eremenko9 Dec 2004, 18:343441w20872
Re: Air travel with a sextantAlexandre Eremenko9 Dec 2004, 18:233384w20870
Re: Air travel with a sextantBruce Stark9 Dec 2004, 18:193292w20868
Re: Air travel with a sextantCarl Herzog9 Dec 2004, 16:583002w20866
Re: Dip uncertaintyTrevor Kenchington9 Dec 2004, 00:585461w20864
Re: Air travel with a sextantHenry Halboth9 Dec 2004, 15:233021w20862
Re: Air travel with a sextantHenry Halboth9 Dec 2004, 15:142667w20860
Re: Air travel with a sextantFred Hebard9 Dec 2004, 13:532418w20858
Re: Air travel with a sextantJim Thompson9 Dec 2004, 11:124217w20856
Re: Air travel with a sextantFrank Reed9 Dec 2004, 07:044132w20854
Traveling with sextantsGordon Talge9 Dec 2004, 06:423130w20852
Re: Old style lunarKen Muldrew9 Dec 2004, 05:543214w20850
Re: Air travel with a sextantAlexandre Eremenko9 Dec 2004, 05:502802w20848
Re: Air travel with a sextantCliff Sojourner9 Dec 2004, 05:522507w20846
Re: Air travel with a sextantFred Hebard9 Dec 2004, 05:374723w20844
Re: Old style lunarAlexandre Eremenko9 Dec 2004, 05:102711w20842
Re: Air travel with a sextantAlexandre Eremenko9 Dec 2004, 05:052768w20840
Re: Air travel with a sextantFrank Reed9 Dec 2004, 04:373309w20838
Old style lunarKen Muldrew9 Dec 2004, 04:2112048w20836
Re: Air travel with a sextantAlexandre Eremenko9 Dec 2004, 04:234110w20834
Re: Air travel with a sextantFred Hebard9 Dec 2004, 04:033273w20832
Re: "ded" versus "dead" reckoningFred Hebard9 Dec 2004, 03:512578w20830
Air travel with a sextantAlexandre Eremenko9 Dec 2004, 03:482657w20828
Re: "ded" versus "dead" reckoningAlexandre Eremenko9 Dec 2004, 03:392748w20826
Re: "ded" versus "dead" reckoningFrank Reed9 Dec 2004, 02:553041w20824
Re: Lunars: Weymouth log (revised)Frank Reed9 Dec 2004, 02:534032w20822
Re: Dip uncertaintyAlexandre Eremenko9 Dec 2004, 01:304015w20820
Re: No Lunars EraAlexandre Eremenko9 Dec 2004, 01:043159w20818
Re: No Lunars EraFred Hebard9 Dec 2004, 00:412401w20816
Re: Lunars: Weymouth log (revised)Alexandre Eremenko9 Dec 2004, 00:162999w20814
Re: Lunars: Weymouth log (revised)Frank Reed8 Dec 2004, 23:325231w20812
Re: No Lunars EraFrank Reed8 Dec 2004, 23:123455w20810
Re: Moon Occultation of JupiterFrank Reed8 Dec 2004, 23:053288w20808
Re: Dip uncertaintyGeorge Huxtable8 Dec 2004, 23:046988w20806
Re: Dip uncertaintyBruce Stark8 Dec 2004, 21:542499w20804
Re: Dip uncertaintyBruce Stark8 Dec 2004, 21:484848w20802
Re: Dip uncertaintyFred Hebard8 Dec 2004, 21:302703w20800
Re: Lunars: Weymouth log (revised)Alexandre Eremenko8 Dec 2004, 21:242651w20798
Re: Dip uncertaintyAlexandre Eremenko8 Dec 2004, 21:213158w20796
Re: Dip uncertaintyFrank Reed8 Dec 2004, 20:553941w20794
Re: No Lunars EraFred Hebard8 Dec 2004, 16:204096w20792
Re: Dip uncertaintyAlexandre Eremenko8 Dec 2004, 16:053124w20790
Re: Dip uncertaintyAlexandre Eremenko8 Dec 2004, 15:564805w20788
Re: Dip uncertaintyFred Hebard8 Dec 2004, 15:382905w20786
The Navigator's NewsletterJim Thompson8 Dec 2004, 12:403688w20784
Re: Dip uncertaintyTrevor Kenchington8 Dec 2004, 00:274702w20782
For Craig ScottGeorge Huxtable8 Dec 2004, 08:022269w20780
Re: Dip uncertaintyTrevor Kenchington7 Dec 2004, 23:4610505w20778
Re: Dip uncertaintyGeorge Huxtable7 Dec 2004, 22:377914w20776
Lunars: Weymouth log (revised)Frank Reed7 Dec 2004, 22:1827982w20774
Re: No Lunars EraFrank Reed7 Dec 2004, 20:365458w20772
Re: No Lunars EraFrank Reed7 Dec 2004, 20:233151w20770
Why there was No Lunars EraAlexandre Eremenko7 Dec 2004, 20:034758w20768
Re: Dip uncertaintyFred Hebard7 Dec 2004, 19:543109w20766
Re: Dip uncertaintyAlexandre Eremenko7 Dec 2004, 18:293000w20764
Re: DR, was: No Lunars EraKen Muldrew7 Dec 2004, 18:263986w20762
Re: Dip uncertaintyTrevor Kenchington7 Dec 2004, 03:033919w20760
Re: DR, was: No Lunars EraTrevor Kenchington7 Dec 2004, 04:512802w20758
Re: Dip uncertaintyTrevor Kenchington7 Dec 2004, 04:483568w20756
Lewis & Clark lunars and latitudes was:[NAV-L] No Lunars EraGeorge Huxtable7 Dec 2004, 17:525882w20754
Re: No Lunars EraKen Muldrew7 Dec 2004, 17:223994w20752
Re: No Lunars EraHenry Halboth7 Dec 2004, 15:373643w20750
Re: Lunar eraHenry Halboth7 Dec 2004, 15:123538w20748
Re: No Lunars EraFred Hebard7 Dec 2004, 05:023134w20746
Re: DR, was: No Lunars EraFred Hebard7 Dec 2004, 04:342827w20744
Re: Dip uncertaintyFred Hebard7 Dec 2004, 03:562999w20742
Re: Dip uncertaintyFred Hebard7 Dec 2004, 03:532218w20740
Re: No Lunars EraFred Hebard7 Dec 2004, 03:413935w20738
Re: No Lunars EraAlexandre Eremenko7 Dec 2004, 02:523417w20736
Re: No Lunars EraFrank Reed7 Dec 2004, 02:363518w20734
Re: No Lunars EraAlexandre Eremenko7 Dec 2004, 02:303676w20732
Re: No Lunars EraAlexandre Eremenko7 Dec 2004, 02:072947w20730
Re: Dip uncertaintyAlexandre Eremenko7 Dec 2004, 01:593387w20728
Re: Dip uncertaintyAlexandre Eremenko7 Dec 2004, 01:452662w20726
Re: Dip uncertaintyAlexandre Eremenko7 Dec 2004, 01:423407w20724
"ded" versus "dead" reckoningFrank Reed7 Dec 2004, 01:404036w20722
Re: Dip uncertaintyFrank Reed7 Dec 2004, 01:373488w20720
Re: No Lunars EraFrank Reed7 Dec 2004, 01:337617w20718
DR, was: No Lunars EraTrevor Kenchington7 Dec 2004, 01:163080w20716
Re: Dip uncertaintyTrevor Kenchington6 Dec 2004, 23:584831w20714
Re: Dip uncertaintyTrevor Kenchington6 Dec 2004, 19:256145w20712
Re: No Lunars EraTrevor Kenchington6 Dec 2004, 19:054208w20710
Re: No Lunars EraFrank Reed7 Dec 2004, 01:074044w20708
Re: No Lunars EraFrank Reed7 Dec 2004, 01:024743w20706
Re: No Lunars EraFrank Reed7 Dec 2004, 00:565726w20704
Re: Lunar eraFrank Reed7 Dec 2004, 00:503880w20702
Re: No Lunars EraPeter Fogg7 Dec 2004, 00:492404w20700
Re: No Lunars EraFrank Reed7 Dec 2004, 00:479619w20698
Re: Dip uncertaintyBruce Stark7 Dec 2004, 00:382446w20696
Re: No Lunars EraFrank Reed7 Dec 2004, 00:325494w20694
Re: Dip uncertaintyFrank Reed7 Dec 2004, 00:245933w20692
Re: No Lunars EraFrank Reed7 Dec 2004, 00:1611179w20690
Re:       Re: Dip uncertaintyBruce Stark7 Dec 2004, 00:063890w20688
Re: No Lunars EraFrank Reed6 Dec 2004, 23:525199w20686
Re: No Lunars EraFrank Reed6 Dec 2004, 23:4512226w20684
Re: No Lunars EraKen Muldrew6 Dec 2004, 23:344135w20682
Re: Dip uncertaintyAlexandre Eremenko6 Dec 2004, 23:233455w20680
Re: No Lunars EraAlexandre Eremenko6 Dec 2004, 23:142850w20678
Re: C. Plath on ebayAlexandre Eremenko6 Dec 2004, 23:072751w20676
Re: No Lunars EraKen Muldrew6 Dec 2004, 22:133384w20674
Re: Dip uncertaintyBruce Stark6 Dec 2004, 22:013939w20672
Re: C. Plath on ebayJoel Jacobs6 Dec 2004, 22:006707w20670
Re: No Lunars EraAlexandre Eremenko6 Dec 2004, 21:193542w20668
Re: Dip uncertaintyAlexandre Eremenko6 Dec 2004, 20:583736w20666
Re: No Lunars EraAlexandre Eremenko6 Dec 2004, 20:454495w20664
Re: No Lunars EraGeorge Huxtable6 Dec 2004, 20:334526w20662
Re: Dip uncertaintyGeorge Huxtable6 Dec 2004, 20:332567w20660
Re: Dip uncertaintyGeorge Huxtable6 Dec 2004, 20:333452w20658
Re: Dip uncertaintyBruce Stark6 Dec 2004, 20:084396w20656
Re: No Lunars EraKen Muldrew6 Dec 2004, 20:036454w20654
Lunar eraAlexandre Eremenko6 Dec 2004, 19:102655w20652
Re: Dip uncertaintyAlexandre Eremenko6 Dec 2004, 18:562888w20650
Re: Dip uncertaintyAlexandre Eremenko6 Dec 2004, 18:524417w20648
Re: No Lunars EraAlexandre Eremenko6 Dec 2004, 18:274843w20646
Re: Dip uncertaintyBruce Stark6 Dec 2004, 18:182910w20644
Re: No Lunars EraKen Muldrew6 Dec 2004, 18:102772w20642
Re: Dip uncertaintyTrevor Kenchington6 Dec 2004, 14:165658w20640
Re: No Lunars EraBruce Stark6 Dec 2004, 18:023897w20638
Re:Re:       Re: Dip uncertaintyAlexandre Eremenko6 Dec 2004, 17:543698w20636
Re: No Lunars EraKen Muldrew6 Dec 2004, 17:133797w20634
Re:       Re: Dip uncertaintyBruce Stark6 Dec 2004, 16:313134w20632
Re: Dip uncertaintyAlexandre Eremenko6 Dec 2004, 16:142795w20630
Re: Dip uncertaintyBruce Stark6 Dec 2004, 16:082489w20628
Re: Dip uncertaintyAlexandre Eremenko6 Dec 2004, 15:403202w20626
Re: Delta-TOmar Reis6 Dec 2004, 14:013198w20624
Re: Delta-TOmar Reis6 Dec 2004, 14:203197w20622
Re: Dip uncertaintyGeorge Huxtable6 Dec 2004, 12:416441w20620
Re: No Lunars EraHenry Halboth6 Dec 2004, 03:015395w20618
Re: Dip uncertaintyBruce Stark6 Dec 2004, 02:364723w20616
Re: Dip uncertaintyAlexandre Eremenko6 Dec 2004, 00:253146w20614
Re:       Re: Swinging the ArcBruce Stark6 Dec 2004, 00:193313w20612
Re:       Re: No Lunars EraBruce Stark5 Dec 2004, 23:573924w20610
Re: Swinging the ArcBill B5 Dec 2004, 23:492770w20608
Re: Swinging the ArcFrank Reed5 Dec 2004, 23:238116w20606
Dip uncertaintyBruce Stark5 Dec 2004, 23:222650w20604
Re: Swinging the ArcFrank Reed5 Dec 2004, 23:063451w20602
From Chauvenet to Dutton: Nav. & Naut. Astro.Frank Reed5 Dec 2004, 23:046039w20600
Re: Swinging the ArcBruce Stark5 Dec 2004, 23:022711w20598
Re: Swinging the ArcAlexandre Eremenko5 Dec 2004, 21:403097w20596
Re: Sextant "side error" and star-star sightsAlexandre Eremenko5 Dec 2004, 21:342805w20594
Re: No Lunars EraAlexandre Eremenko5 Dec 2004, 21:293611w20592
Swinging the ArcFrank Reed5 Dec 2004, 21:234776w20590
Re: Sextant "side error" and star-star sightsFrank Reed5 Dec 2004, 21:114000w20588
No Lunars EraFrank Reed5 Dec 2004, 21:066922w20586
Re: Sextant "side error" and star-star sightsAlexandre Eremenko5 Dec 2004, 20:593492w20584
Sextant "side error" and star-star sightsFrank Reed5 Dec 2004, 20:414125w20582
Re: C. Plath on ebayFrank Reed5 Dec 2004, 20:363319w20580
Re: A Lunar from the 1840sFrank Reed5 Dec 2004, 20:348970w20578
Re: Long-term orbit predictability: was [Nav-l] Delta-TFrank Reed5 Dec 2004, 20:304725w20576
Re: Long-term orbit predictability: was [Nav-l] Delta-TFrank Reed5 Dec 2004, 20:203786w20574
Re: Delta-TMichael Dorl5 Dec 2004, 19:365482w20572
Re: Long-term orbit predictability: was [Nav-l] Delta-TAlexandre Eremenko5 Dec 2004, 18:233738w20570
Re: C. Plath on ebayAlexandre Eremenko5 Dec 2004, 17:483678w20568
Re: C. Plath on ebayCourtney Thomas5 Dec 2004, 15:122400w20566
Long-term orbit predictability: was [Nav-l] Delta-TGeorge Huxtable5 Dec 2004, 11:327907w20564
Re: Moon Occultation of JupiterFrank Reed5 Dec 2004, 07:533474w20562
Re: C. Plath on ebayAlexandre Eremenko5 Dec 2004, 06:322775w20560
Re: C. Plath on ebayKen Gebhart5 Dec 2004, 04:203519w20558
Re: C. Plath on ebayRobert Gainer4 Dec 2004, 22:533173w20556
Re: Lunars: altitude accuracyBruce Stark4 Dec 2004, 19:093058w20554
Re: C. Plath on ebayCarl Herzog4 Dec 2004, 18:202691w20552
Re: Lunars: altitude accuracyAlexandre Eremenko4 Dec 2004, 17:572952w20550
Re: Lunars: altitude accuracyBruce Stark4 Dec 2004, 17:485258w20548
Astronomy and climateGeorge Huxtable4 Dec 2004, 16:013747w20546
Re: Tycho Brahe Mars oppositionsFred Hebard4 Dec 2004, 07:123363w20544
Re: Delta-T: was [NAV-L] Tycho Brahe Mars oppositionsFrank Reed4 Dec 2004, 05:505084w20542
Re: Tycho Brahe Mars oppositionsFrank Reed4 Dec 2004, 05:385987w20540
Re: Delta-TFrank Reed4 Dec 2004, 05:298246w20538
Some Astro TriviaCharles Seitz4 Dec 2004, 03:412840w20536
Re: Delta-TFred Hebard4 Dec 2004, 02:032348w20534
Re: Delta-T: was [NAV-L] Tycho Brahe Mars oppositionsFred Hebard4 Dec 2004, 01:544274w20532
Re: Tycho Brahe Mars oppositionsFred Hebard4 Dec 2004, 01:463964w20530
Re: Delta-TGeorge Huxtable4 Dec 2004, 00:002762w20528
Re: Tycho Brahe Mars oppositionsGeorge Huxtable4 Dec 2004, 00:002955w20526
Re: Moon Occultation of JupiterFrank Reed3 Dec 2004, 23:043337w20524
Re: Moon Occultation of JupiterFrank Reed3 Dec 2004, 22:563285w20522
Re: Delta-T: was [NAV-L] Tycho Brahe Mars oppositionsFrank Reed3 Dec 2004, 22:546996w20520
Re: Tycho Brahe Mars oppositionsFrank Reed3 Dec 2004, 22:394658w20518
Re: Delta-TGeorge Huxtable3 Dec 2004, 21:547633w20516
Re: DeltaTOmar Reis3 Dec 2004, 20:323244w20514
Re: DeltaT (was Tycho Brahe Mars oppositions)Michael Dorl3 Dec 2004, 18:483614w20512
Re: Tycho Brahe Mars oppositionsMichael Dorl3 Dec 2004, 18:334001w20510
Re: C. Plath on ebayAlexandre Eremenko3 Dec 2004, 18:213035w20508
Re: C. Plath on ebayJoel Jacobs3 Dec 2004, 17:273480w20506
Re: Delta-TAlexandre Eremenko3 Dec 2004, 16:572619w20504
C. Plath on ebayAlexandre Eremenko3 Dec 2004, 16:512611w20502
Re: Moon Occultation of JupiterGeorge Huxtable3 Dec 2004, 14:504298w20500
Re: DeltaT (was Tycho Brahe Mars oppositions)Omar Reis3 Dec 2004, 10:325408w20498
Re: Delta-TGeorge Huxtable3 Dec 2004, 09:586158w20496
Re: Moon Occultation of JupiterFred Hebard3 Dec 2004, 03:152886w20494
Re: Moon Occultation of JupiterGeorge Huxtable3 Dec 2004, 00:307142w20492
Re: Altitudes, close to 90Bill B2 Dec 2004, 21:134516w20490
Re: Delta-T: was [NAV-L] Tycho Brahe Mars oppositionsAlexandre Eremenko2 Dec 2004, 18:543563w20488
Re: Delta-T: was [NAV-L] Tycho Brahe Mars oppositionsRichard B. Langley2 Dec 2004, 18:436077w20486
Delta-T: was [NAV-L] Tycho Brahe Mars oppositionsGeorge Huxtable2 Dec 2004, 18:213927w20484
Re: Long-range airplane navigationCraig Scott2 Dec 2004, 16:392708w20482
Re: Long-range airplane navigationCharles Seitz2 Dec 2004, 15:453104w20480
Re: Long-range airplane navigationAlexandre Eremenko2 Dec 2004, 14:324135w20478
Re: Long-range airplane navigationFred Hebard2 Dec 2004, 13:572069w20476
Re: Long-range airplane navigationDerrick Young2 Dec 2004, 13:454896w20474
Re: Tycho Brahe Mars oppositionsOmar Reis2 Dec 2004, 13:352584w20472
Re: Long-range airplane navigationKen Gebhart2 Dec 2004, 04:544271w20470
Re: Long-range airplane navigationKen Gebhart2 Dec 2004, 04:345007w20468
Re: DipFred Hebard2 Dec 2004, 04:252584w20466
Re: Altitudes, close to 90Frank Reed2 Dec 2004, 03:508919w20464
Re: Dipmeter: was [NAV-L] Wires, back sights and collimationAlexandre Eremenko2 Dec 2004, 03:104095w20462
Re: Dipmeter: was [NAV-L] Wires, back sights and collimationFrank Reed2 Dec 2004, 02:003658w20460
Re: Altitudes, close to 90Bill B2 Dec 2004, 00:303107w20458
Re: Dipmeter: was [NAV-L] Wires, back sights and collimationAlexandre Eremenko2 Dec 2004, 00:013293w20456
Re: Altitudes, close to 90Frank Reed1 Dec 2004, 20:275195w20454
Re: Dipmeter: was [NAV-L] Wires, back sights and collimationFrank Reed1 Dec 2004, 20:173740w20452
Re: Frank's postingsFrank Reed1 Dec 2004, 20:153731w20450
Re: Altitudes, close to 90Bill B1 Dec 2004, 20:102366w20448
Re: Moon Occultation of JupiterFrank Reed1 Dec 2004, 20:0814304w20446
Re: Dipmeter: was [NAV-L] Wires,back sights and collimationGeorge Huxtable1 Dec 2004, 20:106270w20444
Re: Dipmeter: was [NAV-L] Wires, back sights and collimationAlexandre Eremenko1 Dec 2004, 18:414386w20442
Re: Frank's postingsCliff Sojourner1 Dec 2004, 18:211971w20440
Re: Frank's postingsDave Weilacher1 Dec 2004, 15:154390w20438
Re: DipGeorge Huxtable1 Dec 2004, 14:594032w20436
Dipmeter: was [NAV-L] Wires, back sights and collimationGeorge Huxtable1 Dec 2004, 14:585419w20434
Re: Moon Occultation of JupiterGeorge Huxtable1 Dec 2004, 14:587024w20432
Frank's postingsGeorge Huxtable1 Dec 2004, 14:583567w20430
Re: Tycho Brahe Mars oppositionsMichael Dorl1 Dec 2004, 13:084426w20428
Re: Altitudes, close to 90Frank Reed1 Dec 2004, 06:383196w20426
Re: Moon Occultation of JupiterFrank Reed1 Dec 2004, 06:328069w20424
Re: Moon Occultation of JupiterFrank Reed1 Dec 2004, 06:217802w20422
Re: Tycho Brahe Mars oppositionsFrank Reed1 Dec 2004, 06:063478w20420
Re: DipAlexandre Eremenko1 Dec 2004, 06:063689w20418
A Lunar from the 1840sFrank Reed1 Dec 2004, 05:584418w20416
Re: "Got your Book"Frank Reed1 Dec 2004, 05:534178w20414
Re: Wires, back sights and collimationAlexandre Eremenko1 Dec 2004, 05:493424w20412
Re: DipFrank Reed1 Dec 2004, 05:424457w20410
Re: Altitudes, close to 90Alexandre Eremenko1 Dec 2004, 05:383296w20408
Re: Tycho Brahe Mars oppositionsFrank Reed1 Dec 2004, 05:374502w20406
Re: Wires, back sights and collimationAlexandre Eremenko1 Dec 2004, 05:283220w20404
Re: Long-range airplane navigationFrank Reed1 Dec 2004, 05:264039w20402
Re: Altitudes, close to 90Frank Reed1 Dec 2004, 05:156610w20400
Re: Wires, back sights and collimationFrank Reed1 Dec 2004, 04:504518w20398
Re: Moon Occultation of JupiterGeorge Huxtable30 Nov 2004, 23:572622w20396
Re: Moon Occultation of JupiterDave Weilacher30 Nov 2004, 21:015555w20394
Re: Tycho Brahe Mars oppositionsGeorge Huxtable30 Nov 2004, 21:014473w20392
Re: Moon Occultation of JupiterGeorge Huxtable30 Nov 2004, 21:015009w20390
Re: Tycho Brahe Mars oppositionsGeorge Huxtable30 Nov 2004, 19:189088w20388
Moon Occultation of JupiterDavid Edwards30 Nov 2004, 18:148621w20386
Re: Tycho Brahe Mars oppositionsOmar Reis30 Nov 2004, 13:303951w20384
Re: Long-range airplane navigationJim Thompson30 Nov 2004, 13:153464w20382
Re: Tycho Brahe Mars oppositionsMichael Dorl29 Nov 2004, 20:463426w20380
Re: Tycho Brahe Mars oppositionsMichael Dorl29 Nov 2004, 20:364600w20378
Re: Altitudes, close to 90Alexandre Eremenko29 Nov 2004, 18:223105w20376
Re: Navigation-L Digest - 21 Nov 2004 To 28 Nov 2004 (#2004-55)Alexandre Eremenko29 Nov 2004, 17:553047w20374
Re: Long-range airplane navigationCliff Sojourner29 Nov 2004, 17:552031w20372
Re: Navigation-L Digest - 21 Nov 2004 To 28 Nov 2004 (#2004-55)Omar Reis29 Nov 2004, 17:173105w20370
Re: Navigation-L Digest - 21 Nov 2004 To 28 Nov 2004 (#2004-55)John Kennedy29 Nov 2004, 15:222793w20368
Re: IrradiationGeorge Huxtable29 Nov 2004, 10:494661w20366
Re: Long-range airplane navigationGennaro Sammarco29 Nov 2004, 08:393404w20364
Re: IrradiationAlexandre Eremenko29 Nov 2004, 06:274246w20362
Re: Long-range airplane navigationKen Gebhart29 Nov 2004, 04:266566w20360
Re: IrradiationBill B29 Nov 2004, 03:094005w20358
Re: IrradiationBill B29 Nov 2004, 02:353419w20356
Re: IrradiationRobert Gainer29 Nov 2004, 00:5910162w20354
Re: IrradiationTrevor Kenchington29 Nov 2004, 00:474551w20352
Re: Altitudes, close to 90Trevor Kenchington27 Nov 2004, 02:222798w20350
Re: IrradiationGeorge Huxtable29 Nov 2004, 00:248684w20348
Re: IrradiationBill B28 Nov 2004, 21:512627w20346
Re: IrradiationBill B28 Nov 2004, 21:292932w20344
Re: IrradiationBill B28 Nov 2004, 21:132370w20342
Re: IrradiationMarvin Sebourn28 Nov 2004, 21:073735w20340
Re: IrradiationBill B28 Nov 2004, 20:593188w20338
Re: IrradiationAlexandre Eremenko28 Nov 2004, 20:554682w20336
Re: IrradiationMarvin Sebourn28 Nov 2004, 20:367918w20334
IrradiationAlexandre Eremenko28 Nov 2004, 20:173024w20332
Re: Long-range airplane navigationGennaro Sammarco28 Nov 2004, 18:205140w20330
"Got your Book"Bruce Stark28 Nov 2004, 18:165101w20328
Re: Long-range airplane navigationGlendon28 Nov 2004, 01:513863w20326
Re: DipGeorge Huxtable28 Nov 2004, 00:463297w20324
Re: Tycho Brahe Mars oppositionsGeorge Huxtable28 Nov 2004, 00:356105w20322
Re: DipDan Allen28 Nov 2004, 00:133513w20320
DipAlexandre Eremenko27 Nov 2004, 23:413177w20318
Tycho Brahe Mars oppositionsOmar Reis27 Nov 2004, 11:113076w20316
Re: Altitudes, close to 90Alexandre Eremenko27 Nov 2004, 01:032642w20314
Re: Altitudes, close to 90Trevor Kenchington26 Nov 2004, 20:183312w20312
Re: Navigational reinventionTrevor Kenchington26 Nov 2004, 20:104656w20310
Re: Navigational reinventionJared Sherman26 Nov 2004, 18:573089w20308
Re: Long-range airplane navigationBrooke Clarke26 Nov 2004, 18:553479w20306
Re: Long-range airplane navigationRenee Mattie26 Nov 2004, 17:493183w20304
Re: Long-range airplane navigationGennaro Sammarco26 Nov 2004, 17:373451w20302
Re: Navigational reinventionTrevor Kenchington25 Nov 2004, 22:585711w20300
Re: Long-range airplane navigationAlexandre Eremenko26 Nov 2004, 02:412829w20298
Re: Wires, back sights and collimationAlexandre Eremenko26 Nov 2004, 02:363403w20296
Long-range airplane navigationFred Hebard26 Nov 2004, 02:332253w20294
Anchor story.George Huxtable26 Nov 2004, 00:302513w20292
Re: Wires, back sights and collimationGeorge Huxtable26 Nov 2004, 00:304815w20290
Navigational reinventionPeter Fogg25 Nov 2004, 22:0632012w20288
Re: Index corr., Octant as dipmeterTrevor Kenchington23 Nov 2004, 02:593566w20286
Radar and Naval Gunnery, was: Index corr., Octant as dipmeterTrevor Kenchington24 Nov 2004, 03:307605w20284
Re: Altitudes, close to 90Alexandre Eremenko24 Nov 2004, 19:232845w20282
Re: Altitudes, close to 90Alexandre Eremenko24 Nov 2004, 19:213968w20280
Altitudes, close to 90Alexandre Eremenko24 Nov 2004, 18:574673w20278
Wires, back sights and collimationAlexandre Eremenko24 Nov 2004, 18:126568w20276
Re: Navigating ProjectilesAlexandre Eremenko24 Nov 2004, 15:055106w20274
Re: Index corr., Octant as dipmeterAlexandre Eremenko24 Nov 2004, 14:052978w20272
Re: Navigating ProjectilesMike Boersma24 Nov 2004, 04:355187w20270
Navigating ProjectilesCharles Seitz24 Nov 2004, 03:044687w20268
Re: Index corr., Octant as dipmeterFred Hebard23 Nov 2004, 18:432049w20266
Re: Index corr., Octant as dipmeterChuck Taylor23 Nov 2004, 18:014218w20264
Re: Index corr., Octant as dipmeterAlexandre Eremenko23 Nov 2004, 16:323847w20262
Re: Index corr., Octant as dipmeterJared Sherman23 Nov 2004, 16:072565w20260
Re: Nevil Maskelyne.Aubrey O´Callaghan23 Nov 2004, 08:5210815w20258
Re: Dip measurement.Alexandre Eremenko23 Nov 2004, 06:025697w20256
Re: Index corr., Octant as dipmeterAlexandre Eremenko23 Nov 2004, 05:083159w20254
Re: Index corr., Octant as dipmeterFred Hebard23 Nov 2004, 03:522089w20252
Re: Dip measurement.Fred Hebard23 Nov 2004, 03:222388w20250
Re: Dip measurement.Alexandre Eremenko23 Nov 2004, 00:574288w20248
Re: Index corr., Octant as dipmeterAlexandre Eremenko23 Nov 2004, 00:263790w20246
Dip measurement.George Huxtable23 Nov 2004, 00:366338w20244
Re: Index corr., Octant as dipmeterTrevor Kenchington22 Nov 2004, 02:126327w20242
Re: Bowditch octantJared Sherman22 Nov 2004, 18:433822w20240
Re: Northeast passage.Paul Bryans22 Nov 2004, 18:352202w20238
Re: ConstellationsBill Noyce22 Nov 2004, 16:283617w20236
Re: Index corr., Octant as dipmeterAlexandre Eremenko22 Nov 2004, 16:063352w20234
Re: ConstellationsJohn Kabel22 Nov 2004, 16:042692w20232
Re: Northeast passage. was:Polar Possessions of the SU.Alexandre Eremenko22 Nov 2004, 15:593286w20230
ConstellationsMichael Dorl22 Nov 2004, 15:433290w20228
Re: Octant as dipmeterAlexandre Eremenko22 Nov 2004, 15:402690w20226
Re: Bowditch octantOmar Reis22 Nov 2004, 11:553097w20224
Dip measurement : was Index corr., Octant as dipmeterGeorge Huxtable22 Nov 2004, 11:174651w20222
Re: Index corr., Octant as dipmeterGeorge Huxtable22 Nov 2004, 08:525006w20220
Re: Northeast passage. was:Polar Possessions of the SU.Jared Sherman22 Nov 2004, 01:022625w20218
Re: Index corr., Octant as dipmeterJared Sherman22 Nov 2004, 01:002922w20216
Re: Index corr., Octant as dipmeterGeorge Huxtable22 Nov 2004, 00:2310986w20214
Re: Octant as dipmeterGeorge Huxtable22 Nov 2004, 00:234921w20212
Re: Northeast passage. was:Polar Possessions of the SU.George Huxtable22 Nov 2004, 00:233687w20210
Re: Index corr. for back sights, was: Octant as dipmeterAlexandre Eremenko21 Nov 2004, 17:163284w20208
Re: Bowditch octantAlexandre Eremenko21 Nov 2004, 17:052700w20206
Re: Index corr. for back sights, was: Octant as dipmeterGeorge Huxtable21 Nov 2004, 17:059990w20204
Re: Bowditch octantGeorge Huxtable21 Nov 2004, 17:052523w20202
Re: Index corr., Octant as dipmeterAlexandre Eremenko21 Nov 2004, 03:304233w20200
Re: Index corr., Octant as dipmeterJared Sherman21 Nov 2004, 02:433870w20198
Index corr., Octant as dipmeterAlexandre Eremenko21 Nov 2004, 01:104225w20196
Re: SNOT design. Was: Why is a sextant like it is?Joel Jacobs20 Nov 2004, 22:599984w20194
Re: SNOT design. Was: Why is a sextant like it is?Joel Jacobs20 Nov 2004, 22:548954w20192
Index corr. for back sightsAlexandre Eremenko20 Nov 2004, 20:163176w20190
Index corr. for back sights, was: Octant as dipmeterAlexandre Eremenko20 Nov 2004, 16:333529w20188
Re: Index correction, was: Got your book, Bruce StarkFred Hebard20 Nov 2004, 16:203291w20186
Re: Octant as dipmeterAlexandre Eremenko20 Nov 2004, 15:282870w20184
Re: Octant as dipmeterAlexandre Eremenko20 Nov 2004, 15:215452w20182
Re: Octant as dipmeterGeorge Huxtable20 Nov 2004, 11:315974w20180
Re: Index correction, was: Got your book, Bruce StarkTrevor Kenchington19 Nov 2004, 16:503154w20178
Re: Nautical Mile, was: Why is a sextant like it is?Trevor Kenchington19 Nov 2004, 04:525662w20176
Re: Bowditch octantAlexandre Eremenko20 Nov 2004, 01:083401w20174
Re: Got your book, Bruce StarkFred Hebard20 Nov 2004, 01:032677w20172
Octant as dipmeterAlexandre Eremenko20 Nov 2004, 00:533516w20170
Re: Bowditch octantAlexandre Eremenko20 Nov 2004, 00:302605w20168
Re: Bowditch octantAlexandre Eremenko19 Nov 2004, 23:596212w20166
Re: SNOT design. Was: Why is a sextant like it is?Alexandre Eremenko19 Nov 2004, 22:414159w20164
Re: SNOT design. Was: Why is a sextant like it is?Joel Jacobs19 Nov 2004, 21:475123w20162
Re: Unusual scopeJoel Jacobs19 Nov 2004, 21:413666w20160
Unusual ScopeAndrew Corl19 Nov 2004, 19:234294w20158
Bowditch octantOmar Reis19 Nov 2004, 17:192168w20156
Re: Why do we still use this terrible Babylonian hexadecimalsystemChuck Taylor19 Nov 2004, 17:063951w20154
Excel functions for DMS - decimal conversion - second tryMichael Dorl19 Nov 2004, 16:474822w20152
Unusual scopeAlexandre Eremenko19 Nov 2004, 16:112569w20150
Index correction, was: Got your book, Bruce StarkAlexandre Eremenko19 Nov 2004, 16:073314w20148
Bubble Sextant RepairBob AB19 Nov 2004, 14:406482w20146
Got your book, Bruce StarkJim Thompson19 Nov 2004, 13:503009w20144
Re: Why do we still use this terrible Babylonian hexadecimalsystemMichael Dorl19 Nov 2004, 13:485718w20142
Re: Why is a sextant like it is?Gary LaPook19 Nov 2004, 10:193729w20140
Re: Why is a sextant like it is?Gary LaPook19 Nov 2004, 10:043710w20138
Re: Why do we still use this terrible Babylonian hexadecimalsystemGeorge Huxtable19 Nov 2004, 10:154942w20136
Re: Why is a sextant like it is?Bill B19 Nov 2004, 04:582607w20134
Re: Correction. Was: Why is a sextant like it is?Bill B19 Nov 2004, 04:263138w20132
Re: Nautical Mile, was: Why is a sextant like it is?Alexandre Eremenko19 Nov 2004, 03:132997w20130
Correction. Was: Why is a sextant like it is?Alexandre Eremenko19 Nov 2004, 03:042584w20128
Re: Why do we still use this terrible Babylonian hexadecimalsystemCliff Sojourner19 Nov 2004, 01:482405w20126
Re: Why is a sextant like it is?George Huxtable19 Nov 2004, 01:252861w20124
Re: Why do we still use this terrible Babylonian hexadecimalsystemGeorge Huxtable19 Nov 2004, 01:252966w20122
Nautical Mile, was: Why is a sextant like it is?Trevor Kenchington18 Nov 2004, 23:304350w20120
Re: Why is a sextant like it is?Derrick Young18 Nov 2004, 22:033118w20118
Re: Why is a sextant like it is?Bill B18 Nov 2004, 21:433735w20116
Re: Why is a sextant like it is?Henry Halboth18 Nov 2004, 21:055522w20114
SNOT design. Was: Why is a sextant like it is?Alexandre Eremenko18 Nov 2004, 20:333204w20112
Re: Why do we still use this terrible Babylonian hexadecimalsystemAlexandre Eremenko18 Nov 2004, 20:123017w20110
Re: Why is a sextant like it is?Alexandre Eremenko18 Nov 2004, 19:514402w20108
Re: Why do we still use this terrible Babylonian hexadecimalsystemFrank Reed18 Nov 2004, 19:294678w20102
Re: Why is a sextant like it is?Jared Sherman18 Nov 2004, 18:453129w20100
Re: Why do we still use this terrible Babylonian hexadecimalsystemChuck Taylor18 Nov 2004, 16:192849w20098
Re: Why is a sextant like it is?Chuck Taylor18 Nov 2004, 16:072555w20096
Re: Why is a sextant like it is?Robert Gainer18 Nov 2004, 17:453203w20094
Re: Why do we still use this terrible Babylonian hexadecimalsystemAlexandre Eremenko18 Nov 2004, 16:134509w20092
Why do we still use this terrible Babylonian hexadecimal systemMichael Dorl18 Nov 2004, 15:283708w20090
Re: Why is a sextant like it is?Bill B18 Nov 2004, 05:372124w20088
Re: Why is a sextant like it is?Alexandre Eremenko18 Nov 2004, 05:092840w20086
Re: Why is a sextant like it is?Gary LaPook18 Nov 2004, 04:324780w20084
Re: Why is a sextant like it is?Trevor Kenchington18 Nov 2004, 00:383604w20082
Re: Why is a sextant like it is?Alexandre Eremenko17 Nov 2004, 20:334330w20080
Re: 3 Lop'sGeorge Huxtable17 Nov 2004, 19:544740w20078
Why is a sextant like it is?George Huxtable17 Nov 2004, 19:543984w20076
Re: Dip of the horizonAlexandre Eremenko17 Nov 2004, 15:473540w20074
Re: Dip of the horizonGeorge Huxtable16 Nov 2004, 21:3410693w20072
Re: To Frank ReedAlexandre Eremenko16 Nov 2004, 02:212588w20070
Re: To Frank ReedFrank Reed16 Nov 2004, 02:142611w20068
Re: Dip of the horizonAlexandre Eremenko16 Nov 2004, 02:123384w20066
Re: Dip of the horizonFred Hebard16 Nov 2004, 01:442865w20064
Dip of the horizonAlexandre Eremenko16 Nov 2004, 01:083902w20062
Re: 3 Lop'sBill Noyce15 Nov 2004, 16:513151w20060
Re: 3 Lop'sJoel Jacobs15 Nov 2004, 16:295231w20058
To Frank ReedAlexandre Eremenko15 Nov 2004, 16:152829w20056
Re: 3 Lop'sGeoffrey Kolbe15 Nov 2004, 02:522448w20054
Re: 3 Lop'sFrank Reed15 Nov 2004, 06:312773w20052
Re: 3 Lop'sFrank Reed15 Nov 2004, 06:293898w20050
Re: 3 Lop'sFrank Reed15 Nov 2004, 06:228590w20048
Re: 3 Lop'sFred Hebard15 Nov 2004, 05:272218w20046
Re: 3 Lop'sAlexandre Eremenko15 Nov 2004, 05:152618w20044
Re: 3 Lop'sPeter Fogg15 Nov 2004, 04:352166w20042
Re: 3 Lop'sPeter Fogg15 Nov 2004, 04:252615w20040
Re: 3 Lop'sFred Hebard15 Nov 2004, 04:213055w20038
3 Lop'sAlexandre Eremenko15 Nov 2004, 04:014214w20036
Re: Refraction questionBill B14 Nov 2004, 22:492262w20034
Re: George's testFred Hebard14 Nov 2004, 17:414194w20032
Re: George's testAlexandre Eremenko14 Nov 2004, 16:353901w20030
Re: Refraction questionAlexandre Eremenko14 Nov 2004, 03:342586w20028
Re: Refraction questionAlexandre Eremenko14 Nov 2004, 03:252684w20026
Re: Refraction questionFred Hebard14 Nov 2004, 02:383825w20024
Re: Digital ClockTrevor Kenchington13 Nov 2004, 20:322866w20022
Re: Digital ClockFrank Reed14 Nov 2004, 00:562678w20020
Re: Refraction questionFrank Reed14 Nov 2004, 00:534747w20018
Re: George's testFred Hebard14 Nov 2004, 00:273979w20016
Refraction questionAlexandre Eremenko13 Nov 2004, 23:322868w20014
Re: George's testAlexandre Eremenko13 Nov 2004, 23:244588w20012
Re: Digital ClockJim Thompson13 Nov 2004, 22:442952w20010
Re: Merchant Marine In German Is:Joel Jacobs13 Nov 2004, 18:1310153w20008
Re: Merchant Marine In German Is:Joel Jacobs13 Nov 2004, 18:068770w20006
Re: Merchant Marine In German Is:Joel Jacobs13 Nov 2004, 18:006930w20004
Re: Digital ClockJared Sherman13 Nov 2004, 17:552740w20002
Re: Merchant Marine In German Is Handlesmarine?Wolfgang Köberer13 Nov 2004, 17:5225571w20000
Re: Merchant Marine In German Is:Wolfgang Köberer13 Nov 2004, 17:508666w19998
Re: Digital ClockCraig Scott13 Nov 2004, 17:452694w19996
Merchant Marine In German Is:Wolfgang Köberer13 Nov 2004, 17:433270w19994
Re: Digital ClockCharles Seitz13 Nov 2004, 17:222767w19992
Re: George's testFred Hebard13 Nov 2004, 16:244766w19990
Re: Digital ClockMichael Dorl13 Nov 2004, 13:513304w19988
Re: Digital ClockJim Thompson13 Nov 2004, 11:102486w19986
TestCraig Scott13 Nov 2004, 07:202065w19984
Re: What time is it?Trevor Kenchington13 Nov 2004, 02:403593w19982
Re: Digital ClockTrevor Kenchington13 Nov 2004, 02:322512w19980
Digital ClockPeter Fogg13 Nov 2004, 00:132076w19978
George's testAlexandre Eremenko12 Nov 2004, 23:064683w19976
Re: Merchant Marine In German Is Handlesmarine?Jared Sherman12 Nov 2004, 19:342738w19974
Re: Merchant Marine In German Is Handlesmarine?Joel Jacobs12 Nov 2004, 19:0512770w19972
Re: Merchant Marine In German Is:Joel Jacobs12 Nov 2004, 18:485474w19970
Re: Merchant Marine In German Is:Jared Sherman12 Nov 2004, 18:104005w19968
Re: Merchant Marine In German Is:Henry Halboth12 Nov 2004, 17:463896w19966
Re: Merchant Marine In German Is:Wolfgang Köberer12 Nov 2004, 16:312981w19964
Re: Merchant Marine In German Is:Henry Halboth12 Nov 2004, 16:032377w19962
Re: SNO sextantsAlexandre Eremenko12 Nov 2004, 15:473515w19960
Re: Merchant Marine In German Is:Alexandre Eremenko12 Nov 2004, 15:252770w19958
Re: What time is it?Peter Smith12 Nov 2004, 14:103337w19956
Merchant Marine In German Is:Joel Jacobs12 Nov 2004, 13:352708w19954
Re: SNO sextantsGlendon12 Nov 2004, 09:022680w19952
Re: SNO sextantsAlexandre Eremenko12 Nov 2004, 04:333865w19950
Re: SNO sextantsCourtney Thomas12 Nov 2004, 05:262775w19948
Re: SNO sextantsAlexandre Eremenko12 Nov 2004, 03:232627w19946
Re: SNO sextantsAlexandre Eremenko12 Nov 2004, 03:193568w19944
Re: What time is it?Trevor Kenchington11 Nov 2004, 15:293455w19942
Re: SNO sextantsCourtney Thomas12 Nov 2004, 01:203257w19940
Re: SNO sextantsJoel Jacobs11 Nov 2004, 23:505857w19938
Re: SNO sextantsAlexandre Eremenko11 Nov 2004, 22:423426w19936
Re: SNO sextantsJoel Jacobs11 Nov 2004, 15:369287w19934
Re: Changing e-mail addressDan Hogan11 Nov 2004, 15:182868w19932
Re: SNO sextantsAlexandre Eremenko11 Nov 2004, 15:034864w19930
Re: What time is it?Peter Smith11 Nov 2004, 14:573332w19928
Re: SNO sextantsCourtney Thomas11 Nov 2004, 14:363794w19926
Re: SNO sextantsJoel Jacobs11 Nov 2004, 11:505898w19924
Re: SNO sextantsJoel Jacobs11 Nov 2004, 11:458479w19922
Re: SNO sextantsGlendon11 Nov 2004, 07:403652w19920
Re: SNO sextantsJared Sherman11 Nov 2004, 05:352770w19918
Re: SNO sextantsAlexandre Eremenko11 Nov 2004, 04:233491w19916
Re: SNO sextantsGlendon11 Nov 2004, 03:474514w19914
Changing e-mail addressGordon Talge11 Nov 2004, 03:051855w19912
SNO sextantsAlexandre Eremenko11 Nov 2004, 02:364030w19910
Re: Ebay Sextant?????????Jared Sherman11 Nov 2004, 02:042796w19908
Re: Ebay Sextant?????????Alexandre Eremenko11 Nov 2004, 00:363139w19906
Re: Ebay Sextant?????????Alexandre Eremenko11 Nov 2004, 00:113481w19904
Re: Ebay Sextant?????????Bill B10 Nov 2004, 23:382209w19902
Re: Ebay Sextant?????????Joel Jacobs10 Nov 2004, 23:349616w19900
Re: Ebay Sextant?????????Alexandre Eremenko10 Nov 2004, 23:064675w19898
Re: Ebay Sextant?????????Joel Jacobs10 Nov 2004, 21:597536w19896
Re: Another time zone oddity [long]Frederick Noon10 Nov 2004, 19:322452w19894
Re: What time is it?Trevor Kenchington10 Nov 2004, 14:154332w19892
Re: What time is it?Trevor Kenchington10 Nov 2004, 14:364469w19890
Bris sextant questionsAlexandre Eremenko10 Nov 2004, 19:083399w19888
Apologies. Was: eBay SEXTANT?Alexandre Eremenko10 Nov 2004, 18:483400w19886
Re: Another time zone oddity [long]Ron Roizen10 Nov 2004, 17:027390w19884
Re: Combo water and bushwacking questionKen Muldrew10 Nov 2004, 16:474670w19882
Re: Ebay Sextant?????????Alexandre Eremenko10 Nov 2004, 15:443379w19880
Precomputed lunar distancesSteven Wepster10 Nov 2004, 11:042797w19878
Re: What time is it?Jim Thompson10 Nov 2004, 10:353800w19876
Re: What time is it?Jim Thompson10 Nov 2004, 10:243385w19874
Precomputed lunar distancesSteven Wepster10 Nov 2004, 11:042015w19872
Re: What time is it?Paul Bryans10 Nov 2004, 09:336791w19870
Re: Ebay Sextant?????????Joel Jacobs10 Nov 2004, 09:026862w19868
Another time zone oddity [long]Dan Allen10 Nov 2004, 05:405570w19866
Re: What time is it?Richard B. Langley10 Nov 2004, 03:545612w19864
Re: Ebay Sextant?????????Fred Hebard10 Nov 2004, 03:382599w19862
Re: Ebay Sextant?????????Alexandre Eremenko10 Nov 2004, 03:052809w19860
Combo water and bushwacking questionBill B10 Nov 2004, 03:022254w19858
Re: Ebay Sextant?????????Bill B10 Nov 2004, 02:552259w19856
Re: Ebay Sextant?????????Alexandre Eremenko10 Nov 2004, 02:443043w19854
Re: Ebay Sextant?????????Fred Hebard10 Nov 2004, 02:352233w19852
Re: Ebay Sextant?????????Alexandre Eremenko10 Nov 2004, 01:444583w19850
Re: What time is it?Bill B9 Nov 2004, 23:462988w19848
Re: What time is it?Derrick Young9 Nov 2004, 23:245928w19846
Re: What time is it?Jared Sherman9 Nov 2004, 23:052337w19844
Re: What time is it?Bill B9 Nov 2004, 22:533196w19842
Time IIDoug Royer9 Nov 2004, 22:382375w19840
Re: What time is it?Jared Sherman9 Nov 2004, 22:194978w19838
Re: TimeJared Sherman9 Nov 2004, 22:163993w19836
Re: What time is it?Carl Herzog9 Nov 2004, 22:204377w19834
TimeDoug Royer9 Nov 2004, 22:002773w19832
Re: What time is it?Bill B9 Nov 2004, 21:474235w19830
Re: What time is it?Brooke Clarke9 Nov 2004, 21:172928w19828
Re: What time is it?Jared Sherman9 Nov 2004, 21:093676w19826
Re: What time is it?Alexandre Eremenko9 Nov 2004, 20:573079w19824
Re: What time is it?Bill Noyce9 Nov 2004, 20:553446w19822
What time is it?Jared Sherman9 Nov 2004, 20:472591w19820
Re: Ebay Sextant?????????Alexandre Eremenko9 Nov 2004, 18:162891w19818
Re: Ebay Sextant?????????Joel Jacobs9 Nov 2004, 17:212576w19816
Re: Ebay Sextant?????????Joel Jacobs9 Nov 2004, 17:192763w19814
Re: Ebay Sextant?????????Jared Sherman9 Nov 2004, 17:002600w19812
Re: Ebay Sextant?????????Fred Hebard9 Nov 2004, 16:182557w19810
Re: Ebay Sextant?????????Alexandre Eremenko9 Nov 2004, 16:132909w19808
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingAlexandre Eremenko9 Nov 2004, 14:363048w19806
Re: Ebay Sextant?????????Joel Jacobs9 Nov 2004, 14:272506w19804
Re: Ebay Sextant?????????Courtney Thomas9 Nov 2004, 15:222595w19802
R: Ebay Sextant?????????Federico Rossi9 Nov 2004, 13:542905w19800
Re: Ebay Sextant?????????Fred Hebard9 Nov 2004, 13:472216w19798
R: Ebay Sextant?????????Federico Rossi9 Nov 2004, 13:352850w19796
Ebay Sextant?????????Joel Jacobs9 Nov 2004, 13:271909w19794
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingBill B9 Nov 2004, 05:284494w19792
Re: Lanolin, was TallowGlendon9 Nov 2004, 03:444463w19790
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingFrank Reed9 Nov 2004, 03:232985w19788
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingTrevor Kenchington8 Nov 2004, 22:113816w19786
Re: Tallow, was: Voyaging the traditional wayTrevor Kenchington8 Nov 2004, 22:013644w19784
Re: Polar lights Monday night/Marvin Sebourn9 Nov 2004, 02:022963w19782
Re: Lanolin, was TallowPeter Fogg9 Nov 2004, 01:513979w19780
Re: message for Dan HoganDan Hogan9 Nov 2004, 00:062409w19778
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingAlexandre Eremenko8 Nov 2004, 21:393341w19776
Re: Tallow, was: Voyaging the traditional wayKen James8 Nov 2004, 21:322710w19774
Re: Bris accuracy? 1Alexandre Eremenko8 Nov 2004, 21:252583w19772
Bris accuracy? 1Doug Royer8 Nov 2004, 21:093187w19770
Re: Polar lightsFrank Reed8 Nov 2004, 20:262617w19768
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingFrank Reed8 Nov 2004, 20:203131w19766
Re: Tallow, was: Voyaging the traditional wayTrevor Kenchington7 Nov 2004, 12:017151w19764
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingTrevor Kenchington8 Nov 2004, 01:214960w19762
Re: Polar lightsMichael Dorl8 Nov 2004, 19:493274w19760
Re: Polar lightsMarvin Sebourn8 Nov 2004, 19:327123w19758
Re: Bris accuracy?Alexandre Eremenko8 Nov 2004, 19:034063w19756
Re: Polar lightsAlexandre Eremenko8 Nov 2004, 18:503342w19754
Bris accuracy?Doug Royer8 Nov 2004, 18:493583w19752
Re: Polar lightsAlexandre Eremenko8 Nov 2004, 18:433097w19750
Re: Polar lightsMike Boersma8 Nov 2004, 18:202784w19748
Re: Polar lightsMarvin Sebourn8 Nov 2004, 18:144851w19746
Polar lightsAlexandre Eremenko8 Nov 2004, 17:482824w19744
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingChuck Taylor8 Nov 2004, 16:522255w19742
Message for Dan HoganMarc Bernstein8 Nov 2004, 15:451994w19740
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingMichael Dorl8 Nov 2004, 13:564773w19738
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingRobert Gainer8 Nov 2004, 13:113895w19736
Re: Poly Nesia: So Many Islands...Frank Reed8 Nov 2004, 07:022668w19734
Re: CelNav without sextantsFrank Reed8 Nov 2004, 06:578228w19732
Re: Poly Nesia: So Many Islands...Alexandre Eremenko8 Nov 2004, 06:562390w19730
Poly Nesia: So Many Islands...Frank Reed8 Nov 2004, 06:313898w19728
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingAlexandre Eremenko8 Nov 2004, 06:242508w19726
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingAlexandre Eremenko8 Nov 2004, 06:162706w19724
Re: CelNav without sextantsAlexandre Eremenko8 Nov 2004, 05:522841w19722
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingFrank Reed8 Nov 2004, 05:284913w19720
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingFrank Reed8 Nov 2004, 05:142940w19718
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingFrank Reed8 Nov 2004, 05:104566w19716
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingCraig Scott8 Nov 2004, 04:132362w19714
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingFrank Reed8 Nov 2004, 03:382444w19712
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingFrank Reed8 Nov 2004, 03:464489w19710
Re: CelNav without sextantsFrank Reed8 Nov 2004, 03:369814w19708
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingAlexandre Eremenko8 Nov 2004, 03:142769w19706
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingAlexandre Eremenko8 Nov 2004, 03:073709w19704
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingPeter Fogg8 Nov 2004, 02:073514w19702
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingFred Hebard8 Nov 2004, 01:513049w19700
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingAlexandre Eremenko8 Nov 2004, 00:423459w19698
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingGeoffrey Kolbe7 Nov 2004, 22:042076w19696
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingGeoffrey Kolbe6 Nov 2004, 08:164147w19694
Going off the ListBruce Stark7 Nov 2004, 18:542464w19692
Re: Tallow, was: Voyaging the traditional wayDan Hogan7 Nov 2004, 17:065553w19690
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingGeoffrey Kolbe7 Nov 2004, 09:563616w19688
Moon Occults Jupiter - November 9, 2004Frank Reed7 Nov 2004, 08:572394w19686
Re: Resume of "Averaging"Bill B7 Nov 2004, 06:432157w19684
Re: Resume of "Averaging"Alexandre Eremenko7 Nov 2004, 05:552405w19682
Re: Resume of "Averaging"Bill B7 Nov 2004, 05:489620w19680
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingAlexandre Eremenko7 Nov 2004, 03:443475w19678
Re: Tallow, was: Voyaging the traditional wayBill B7 Nov 2004, 03:353718w19676
Re: Resume of "Averaging"Alexandre Eremenko7 Nov 2004, 03:344277w19674
Re: Tallow, was: Voyaging the traditional wayJared Sherman7 Nov 2004, 02:432964w19672
Re: Tallow, was: Voyaging the traditional wayKen James7 Nov 2004, 02:092778w19670
Tallow, was: Voyaging the traditional wayTrevor Kenchington6 Nov 2004, 23:534970w19668
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingTrevor Kenchington6 Nov 2004, 03:564235w19666
Re: Resume of "Averaging"Chuck Taylor6 Nov 2004, 23:476875w19664
Re: Taffrail logs and Marvin CreamerDoug6 Nov 2004, 21:432771w19662
Re: Bris sextantAlexandre Eremenko6 Nov 2004, 19:362571w19660
Re: Bris sextantNels Tomlinson6 Nov 2004, 16:095237w19658
Re: Bris sextantJoel Jacobs6 Nov 2004, 11:167351w19656
Re: Bris sextantRobert Gainer6 Nov 2004, 06:543255w19654
Taffrail logs and Marvin CreamerRobert Gainer6 Nov 2004, 06:465055w19652
Re: Resume of "Averaging"Alexandre Eremenko6 Nov 2004, 04:255320w19650
Re: AveragingAlexandre Eremenko6 Nov 2004, 03:253710w19648
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingAlexandre Eremenko6 Nov 2004, 03:063806w19646
Re: Resume of "Averaging"Alexandre Eremenko6 Nov 2004, 02:574155w19644
Re: Venus meets Jupiter (was: mouth-watering discussion about fish)David Edwards5 Nov 2004, 15:002727w19642
Re: Venus meets Jupiter (was: mouth-watering discussion aboutfish)Michael Dorl5 Nov 2004, 14:483004w19640
Re: Resume of "Averaging"Herbert Prinz5 Nov 2004, 10:143442w19638
Re: AveragingHerbert Prinz5 Nov 2004, 10:073126w19636
Re: Voyaging the traditional wayGeorge Huxtable5 Nov 2004, 09:472885w19634
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingGeoffrey Kolbe5 Nov 2004, 09:093277w19632
Re: Resume of "Averaging"Peter Fogg5 Nov 2004, 07:402812w19630
Re: Resume of "Averaging"Herbert Prinz5 Nov 2004, 07:323106w19628
Re: Resume of "Averaging"Bill B5 Nov 2004, 05:263069w19626
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingHenry Halboth5 Nov 2004, 04:542328w19624
No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothingAlexandre Eremenko5 Nov 2004, 04:102393w19622
The Moon is in distance with the SunFrank Reed5 Nov 2004, 04:013149w19620
Resume of "Averaging"Alexandre Eremenko5 Nov 2004, 03:355693w19618
Re: Frank's formulas, was: Lunars: altitude accuracyFrank Reed5 Nov 2004, 02:525357w19616
Venus meets Jupiter (was: mouth-watering discussion about fish)Frank Reed5 Nov 2004, 02:152764w19614
Re: Voyaging the traditional wayAlexandre Eremenko5 Nov 2004, 01:543192w19612
Re: Voyaging the traditional wayJared Sherman4 Nov 2004, 22:372850w19610
Re: Voyaging the traditional wayGeorge Huxtable4 Nov 2004, 22:104173w19608
Re: Voyaging the traditional wayCarl Herzog4 Nov 2004, 14:215306w19606
Re: Time at Sea in 1703Bill B4 Nov 2004, 04:392425w19604
Time at Sea in 1703Chuck Taylor4 Nov 2004, 03:084382w19602
Re: Voyaging the traditional wayBill B4 Nov 2004, 01:102599w19600
Re: Voyaging the traditional wayGeorge Huxtable4 Nov 2004, 00:235157w19598
Re: AveragingAlexandre Eremenko3 Nov 2004, 19:323304w19596
Re: AveragingHerbert Prinz3 Nov 2004, 16:194280w19594
Re: Frank's formulas, was: Lunars: altitude accuracyGeorge Huxtable3 Nov 2004, 15:466990w19592
Re: Lunars: altitude accuracyGeorge Huxtable3 Nov 2004, 15:462860w19590
Re: Lunars: A 90 Degree MiracleGeorge Huxtable3 Nov 2004, 15:463533w19588
Re: Bris sextant IINels Tomlinson3 Nov 2004, 10:123044w19586
Re: CelNav without sextantsAlexandre Eremenko3 Nov 2004, 06:092688w19584
Re: CelNav without sextantsAlexandre Eremenko3 Nov 2004, 05:593647w19582
Re: Voyaging the traditional wayBill B3 Nov 2004, 05:242379w19580
Re: CelNav without sextantsBruce Stark3 Nov 2004, 04:423842w19578
Re: Voyaging the traditional wayBill B3 Nov 2004, 04:052867w19576
Re: Voyaging the traditional wayJared Sherman3 Nov 2004, 03:172427w19574
Re: CelNav without sextantsAlexandre Eremenko3 Nov 2004, 03:153910w19572
Re: CelNav without sextantHerbert Prinz3 Nov 2004, 03:173627w19570
Re: CelNav without sextantFrank Reed3 Nov 2004, 02:563870w19568
Re: Voyaging the traditional wayPeter Fogg3 Nov 2004, 02:443098w19566
Re: CelNav without sextantsAlexandre Eremenko3 Nov 2004, 02:282841w19564
Re: CelNav without sextantAlexandre Eremenko3 Nov 2004, 02:193760w19562
Re: Voyaging the traditional wayRobert Gainer3 Nov 2004, 02:153856w19560
Re: CelNav without sextantsFrank Reed3 Nov 2004, 02:104279w19558
Re: Frank's formulas, was: Lunars: altitude accuracyAlexandre Eremenko3 Nov 2004, 01:584949w19556
Re: CelNav without sextantsFrank Reed3 Nov 2004, 01:543706w19554
Re: CelNav without sextantFrank Reed3 Nov 2004, 01:405257w19550
Re: CelNav without sextantAlexandre Eremenko3 Nov 2004, 01:143007w19548
Re: Frank's formulas, was: Lunars: altitude accuracyFrank Reed3 Nov 2004, 01:1010484w19546
Bris sextant IIDoug Royer3 Nov 2004, 00:481962w19544
Bris sextantDoug Royer3 Nov 2004, 00:402411w19542
CelNav without sextantDoug Royer2 Nov 2004, 23:402446w19540
Re: CelNav without sextantAlexandre Eremenko2 Nov 2004, 21:232979w19538
Re: CelNav without sextantAlexandre Eremenko2 Nov 2004, 21:103638w19536
Re: CelNav without sextantsAlexandre Eremenko2 Nov 2004, 21:043543w19534
Re: CelNav without sextantBill Noyce2 Nov 2004, 20:403247w19532
Re: Voyaging the traditional wayRobert Gainer2 Nov 2004, 20:222921w19530
Re: CelNav without sextantsRobert Gainer2 Nov 2004, 20:172125w19528
Re: CelNav without sextantNavastro2 Nov 2004, 20:003168w19526
Re: CelNav without sextantsDave Weilacher2 Nov 2004, 20:002353w19524
Re: CelNav without sextantAlexandre Eremenko2 Nov 2004, 19:462680w19522
Re: CelNav without sextantsAlexandre Eremenko2 Nov 2004, 19:433161w19520
Re: CelNav without sextantPhil Camera2 Nov 2004, 19:223042w19518
CelNav without sextantsDoug Royer2 Nov 2004, 19:193019w19516
Re: CelNav without sextantAlexandre Eremenko2 Nov 2004, 19:152977w19514
Re: CelNav without sextantMike Boersma2 Nov 2004, 18:594398w19512
Re: Voyaging the traditional wayNels Tomlinson2 Nov 2004, 18:592661w19510
CelNav without sextantAlexandre Eremenko2 Nov 2004, 18:003038w19508
Frank's formulas, was: Lunars: altitude accuracyAlexandre Eremenko2 Nov 2004, 17:433523w19506
Re: Averaging lunars: was Lunars with SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko2 Nov 2004, 15:033184w19504
Re: Voyaging the traditional wayRobert Gainer2 Nov 2004, 14:544403w19502
Re: Lunar eclipse reportHerbert Prinz2 Nov 2004, 07:532436w19500
Re: Averaging lunars: was Lunars with SNO-TGeorge Huxtable2 Nov 2004, 07:322643w19498
Re: Averaging lunars: was Lunars with SNO-THerbert Prinz2 Nov 2004, 07:242810w19496
Re: SNOT at large anglesFrank Reed2 Nov 2004, 06:452726w19494
Re: Lunars: A 90 Degree MiracleFrank Reed2 Nov 2004, 06:444187w19492
Re: Lunars: altitude accuracyFrank Reed2 Nov 2004, 06:3512051w19490
Re: Averaging lunars: was Lunars with SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko1 Nov 2004, 23:132582w19488
Re: Averaging lunars: was Lunars with SNO-TGeorge Huxtable1 Nov 2004, 19:052754w19486
Re: Averaging lunars: was Lunars with SNO-THerbert Prinz1 Nov 2004, 17:292615w19484
Re: SNOT at large anglesDan Allen1 Nov 2004, 16:452669w19482
Re: SNOT at large anglesFred Hebard1 Nov 2004, 16:312591w19480
Re: Averaging lunars: was Lunars with SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko1 Nov 2004, 16:082649w19478
Re: Averaging lunars: was Lunars with SNO-TGeorge Huxtable1 Nov 2004, 15:478989w19476
Re: Averaging lunars: was Lunars with SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko1 Nov 2004, 15:102523w19474
Re: Averaging lunars: was Lunars with SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko1 Nov 2004, 15:072930w19472
Re: SNOT at large anglesAlexandre Eremenko1 Nov 2004, 14:513160w19470
Re: Lunar eclipse reportAlexandre Eremenko1 Nov 2004, 14:453160w19468
Re: Lunars: A 90 Degree MiracleGeorge Huxtable1 Nov 2004, 11:196100w19466
Re: Lunars: altitude accuracyGeorge Huxtable1 Nov 2004, 11:195615w19464
Re: Averaging lunars: was Lunars with SNO-THerbert Prinz1 Nov 2004, 10:524037w19462
Re: Averaging lunars: was Lunars with SNO-THerbert Prinz1 Nov 2004, 10:413551w19460
Lunars: A 90 Degree MiracleFrank Reed1 Nov 2004, 03:598907w19458
Re: Voyaging the traditional way, Clay, venturing a bit off-topicMarvin Sebourn1 Nov 2004, 03:425469w19456
Re: Lunars: altitude accuracyFrank Reed1 Nov 2004, 03:2710160w19454
Re: Nautical Almanac UsageStacy Hanna1 Nov 2004, 03:192983w19452
Re: Voyaging the traditional wayFrank Reed1 Nov 2004, 02:502814w19450
Re: Lunar eclipse reportFrank Reed1 Nov 2004, 02:478196w19448
Re: Voyaging the traditional wayHerbert Prinz1 Nov 2004, 02:502852w19446
Re: SNOT at large anglesFrank Reed1 Nov 2004, 02:203193w19444
Re: Lunar eclipse reportFrank Reed1 Nov 2004, 02:175897w19442
Re: Missed opportunities, was: Moon eclipseFrank Reed1 Nov 2004, 02:043290w19440
Re: Voyaging the traditional wayFrank Reed1 Nov 2004, 01:503074w19438
Re: Lunar eclipse reportHerbert Prinz31 Oct 2004, 23:374733w19436
Re: Voyaging the traditional wayFred Hebard31 Oct 2004, 22:502375w19434
Re: N.A. Moon phasesBill B31 Oct 2004, 22:043802w19432
Re: N.A. + Moon phaseBill B31 Oct 2004, 21:423169w19430
Re: Voyaging the traditional wayTrevor Kenchington31 Oct 2004, 23:443237w19429
Re: Averaging lunars: was Lunars with SNO-TGeorge Huxtable31 Oct 2004, 21:348104w19428
Re: Lunar eclipse reportGeorge Huxtable31 Oct 2004, 21:344276w19426
Re: Voyaging the traditional wayN S Gurnell31 Oct 2004, 20:213469w19424
SNOT at large anglesAlexandre Eremenko31 Oct 2004, 05:332783w19422
Re: Lunar eclipse reportAlexandre Eremenko30 Oct 2004, 23:563132w19420
Re: Lunar eclipse reportHerbert Prinz30 Oct 2004, 23:513029w19418
Armillary shphere, search engineAlexandre Eremenko30 Oct 2004, 21:333172w19416
Averaging lunars: was Lunars with SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko30 Oct 2004, 20:404642w19414
Missed opportunities, was: Moon eclipseAlexandre Eremenko30 Oct 2004, 19:253375w19412
Re: Datum for Nautical AlmanacHerbert Prinz30 Oct 2004, 18:054733w19410
Re: Datum for Nautical AlmanacMichael Dorl30 Oct 2004, 17:486217w19408
Re: Datum for Nautical AlmanacCharles Seitz30 Oct 2004, 15:463632w19406
Re: N.A. Moon phasesGeorge Huxtable30 Oct 2004, 12:464946w19404
Voyaging the traditional wayGeorge Huxtable30 Oct 2004, 12:463231w19402
Re: Datum for Nautical AlmanacGeorge Huxtable30 Oct 2004, 12:454340w19400
Re: Datum for Nautical AlmanacHerbert Prinz30 Oct 2004, 08:402974w19398
Re: Lunar eclipses and other thingsHerbert Prinz29 Oct 2004, 20:227458w19396
Re: Lunar eclipses and other thingsHerbert Prinz30 Oct 2004, 07:527621w19394
Re: Lunar eclipses and other thingsHerbert Prinz30 Oct 2004, 07:112686w19392
Philosophical TransactionsHerbert Prinz30 Oct 2004, 07:033113w19390
Re: Halley papers, was: Question on LunarsAlexandre Eremenko30 Oct 2004, 05:532616w19388
Re: Lunar eclipses and other thingsHerbert Prinz29 Oct 2004, 21:362713w19386
Averaging lunars: was Lunars with SNO-TGeorge Huxtable29 Oct 2004, 17:216921w19384
Alex's LunarsMike Burkes29 Oct 2004, 18:254121w19382
N.A. + Moon phaseDoug Royer29 Oct 2004, 18:142591w19380
TESTING Re: 600 messages this month?Frank Reed29 Oct 2004, 18:082593w19378
Re: N.A. + Moon phaseDoug Royer29 Oct 2004, 19:032804w19376
Re: Averaging sightsRobert Gainer29 Oct 2004, 14:405654w19374
Re: Halley papers, was: Question on LunarsFrank Reed29 Oct 2004, 03:422870w19372
Re: Datum for Nautical AlmanacMichael Dorl29 Oct 2004, 15:323441w19370
Halley papers, was: Question on LunarsAlexandre Eremenko29 Oct 2004, 01:192876w19368
Re: N.A. Moon phasesBill B29 Oct 2004, 01:023021w19366
Re: Question on LunarsMarvin Sebourn28 Oct 2004, 23:213045w19364
Re: Question on LunarsLisa Fiene28 Oct 2004, 23:192612w19362
Re: Lunars with SNO-TFrank Reed28 Oct 2004, 22:534171w19360
Re: Rejecting rogue observations.Alexandre Eremenko28 Oct 2004, 22:472716w19358
Re: Lunars with SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko28 Oct 2004, 22:434122w19356
N.A. Moon phasesDoug Royer28 Oct 2004, 22:341957w19354
Almanac Moon DataBill B28 Oct 2004, 22:013382w19352
Re: Lunar eclipse reportFrank Reed28 Oct 2004, 21:396334w19350
Re: Lunars with SNO-TFrank Reed28 Oct 2004, 21:216493w19348
Rejecting rogue observations.George Huxtable28 Oct 2004, 21:274158w19346
Re: Lunars with SNO-TGeorge Huxtable28 Oct 2004, 21:274624w19344
Re: Question on LunarsFrank Reed28 Oct 2004, 20:593031w19342
Lunars Almanac Data (was Re: In the spirit...)Frank Reed28 Oct 2004, 20:527318w19340
Re: Datum for Nautical AlmanacGeorge Huxtable28 Oct 2004, 19:124821w19338
Re: Lunars with SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko28 Oct 2004, 18:482674w19336
Re:Re:       Question on LunarsAlexandre Eremenko28 Oct 2004, 18:433533w19334
Re: Lunar eclipses and other thingsAlexandre Eremenko28 Oct 2004, 18:274187w19332
Re: Lunars with SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko28 Oct 2004, 18:146006w19330
Re: In the spirit...Dan Allen28 Oct 2004, 17:413469w19328
Re: Question on LunarsAlexandre Eremenko28 Oct 2004, 15:322542w19326
Re: 0000 not 2400?Craig Scott28 Oct 2004, 15:252493w19324
Datum for Nautical AlmanacMichael Dorl28 Oct 2004, 13:482798w19322
Re: Lunar eclipses and other thingsHerbert Prinz27 Oct 2004, 21:322216w19320
Re: Lunar eclipses and other thingsAlexandre Eremenko27 Oct 2004, 23:102806w19318
Re: Question on LunarsFrank Reed28 Oct 2004, 00:228208w19316
Re:       Question on LunarsFrank Reed28 Oct 2004, 00:294744w19314
Re: Lunars with SNO-TFrank Reed28 Oct 2004, 00:535722w19312
Re:       Question on LunarsFrank Reed28 Oct 2004, 00:344346w19310
Re: Lunars with SNO-TFrank Reed28 Oct 2004, 00:433632w19308
Re: In the spirit...Frank Reed28 Oct 2004, 01:023918w19306
Lunar eclipse reportAlexandre Eremenko28 Oct 2004, 05:3810199w19304
Re: Lunar eclipses and other thingsWolfgang Köberer28 Oct 2004, 07:073091w19302
Re: astroabes, was: Lunar eclipses and other thingsWolfgang Köberer28 Oct 2004, 07:242805w19300
Re: Lunars with SNO-TGeorge Huxtable28 Oct 2004, 10:038240w19298
Re: Lunars with SNO-TGeorge Huxtable27 Oct 2004, 13:5210187w19296
Re: Question on LunarsGeorge Huxtable27 Oct 2004, 13:523930w19294
Re: Lunar eclipses and other thingsKen Muldrew27 Oct 2004, 16:033144w19292
Re: Lunar eclipses and other thingsAlexandre Eremenko27 Oct 2004, 18:087394w19290
Lunar EclipseKen Muldrew27 Oct 2004, 20:357695w19288
Averaging sightsJim Thompson27 Oct 2004, 11:224887w19286
Re: Lunar eclipses and other thingsHerbert Prinz27 Oct 2004, 11:287317w19284
Re: Lunar eclipses and other thingsAlexandre Eremenko27 Oct 2004, 06:174126w19282
Re: Navigation questionBill B27 Oct 2004, 05:232274w19280
Re: Ice Navigation, was: Polar Possessions of the SUBill B27 Oct 2004, 04:475607w19278
Navigation questionGlendon27 Oct 2004, 03:305387w19276
Re: Lunar eclipses and other thingsLisa Fiene27 Oct 2004, 03:294897w19274
Re: Lunar eclipses and other thingsAlexandre Eremenko27 Oct 2004, 03:043681w19272
Re: Lunar eclipses and other thingsLisa Fiene27 Oct 2004, 02:434182w19270
Re: Lunar eclipses and other thingsAlexandre Eremenko27 Oct 2004, 02:253294w19268
Re: Lunar eclipses and other thingsLisa Fiene27 Oct 2004, 02:049087w19266
Ice Navigation, was: Polar Possessions of the SUTrevor Kenchington26 Oct 2004, 21:243260w19264
Re: OtherThingsAlexandre Eremenko27 Oct 2004, 01:543725w19262
Re: Lunar eclipses and other thingsAlexandre Eremenko27 Oct 2004, 01:333013w19260
Re: Lunars with SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko27 Oct 2004, 01:196307w19258
Re: Lunars with SNO-TFred Hebard27 Oct 2004, 01:003201w19256
OtherThingsDoug Royer27 Oct 2004, 00:413290w19254
Re: Lunars with SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko27 Oct 2004, 00:343935w19252
Re: Lunar eclipses and other thingsAlexandre Eremenko27 Oct 2004, 00:022445w19250
Re: Lunar eclipses and other thingsLisa Fiene26 Oct 2004, 23:558299w19248
Lunar eclipses and other thingsAlexandre Eremenko26 Oct 2004, 23:325693w19246
Re: Lunars with SNO-TGeorge Huxtable26 Oct 2004, 23:426274w19244
Re: Question on LunarsHerbert Prinz26 Oct 2004, 23:323240w19242
Re: Lunars with SNO-TFred Hebard26 Oct 2004, 22:473248w19240
Re: Moon Eclipse Wednesday Oct 27 (28 at Greenwich)Jim Thompson26 Oct 2004, 22:392900w19238
Re: Lunars with SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko26 Oct 2004, 22:063082w19236
Re: Polar Possessions of the SU. was: Lunars with SNO-TBill B26 Oct 2004, 20:554976w19234
Re: Lunars with SNO-TFred Hebard26 Oct 2004, 20:252204w19232
Re: Moon Eclipse tonightTrevor Kenchington26 Oct 2004, 09:022741w19230
Re: Lunars with SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko26 Oct 2004, 18:045899w19228
Re: Polar Possessions of the SU. was: Lunars with SNO-TGeorge Huxtable26 Oct 2004, 18:163234w19226
Re: WarningChuck Taylor26 Oct 2004, 14:561880w19224
Re: Question on LunarsGeorge Huxtable26 Oct 2004, 14:595930w19222
Re: Lunars with SNO-TGeorge Huxtable26 Oct 2004, 14:597766w19220
Re: In the spirit...Dan Allen26 Oct 2004, 14:003018w19218
Re: In the spirit...Courtney Thomas26 Oct 2004, 14:432288w19216
In the spirit...Dan Allen26 Oct 2004, 12:522259w19214
Re: Question on LunarsHerbert Prinz26 Oct 2004, 10:034728w19212
Re: Moon Eclipse tonightJim Thompson26 Oct 2004, 09:322729w19210
Re: WarningLisa Fiene26 Oct 2004, 06:562471w19208
Re: WarningAlexandre Eremenko26 Oct 2004, 06:433402w19206
Re: WarningLisa Fiene26 Oct 2004, 06:192509w19204
WarningAlexandre Eremenko26 Oct 2004, 06:152401w19202
Re: Lunars with SNO-TFred Hebard26 Oct 2004, 04:384254w19200
Re: Lunars with SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko26 Oct 2004, 03:333451w19198
Re: Lunars with SNO-TFred Hebard26 Oct 2004, 03:024971w19196
Re: Polar Possessions of the SU. was: Lunars with SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko26 Oct 2004, 02:585220w19194
Re: Lunars with SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko26 Oct 2004, 02:463322w19192
Re: Polar Possessions of the SU. was: Lunars with SNO-TTrevor Kenchington25 Oct 2004, 10:014005w19190
Re:Re:       Question on LunarsAlexandre Eremenko26 Oct 2004, 01:352575w19188
Re:Re:       Question on LunarsAlexandre Eremenko26 Oct 2004, 01:313229w19186
Re:       Question on LunarsBruce Stark26 Oct 2004, 00:094804w19184
Re:       Question on LunarsBruce Stark25 Oct 2004, 23:282963w19182
Question on LunarsAlexandre Eremenko25 Oct 2004, 22:383310w19180
Re: Northeast passage. was:Polar Possessions of the SU.Alexandre Eremenko25 Oct 2004, 21:405945w19178
Re: Lunars with SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko25 Oct 2004, 21:093769w19176
Northeast passage. was:Polar Possessions of the SU.George Huxtable25 Oct 2004, 20:584112w19174
Re: Polar Possessions of the SU. was: Lunars with SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko25 Oct 2004, 18:593074w19172
Phi Prime Phi 2ndDoug Royer25 Oct 2004, 17:572753w19170
Re: Polar Possessions of the SU. was: Lunars with SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko25 Oct 2004, 16:464931w19168
Re: Polar Possessions of the SU. was: Lunars with SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko25 Oct 2004, 16:082409w19166
Re: GPS apocalyptic scenario...Dave Weilacher25 Oct 2004, 12:262500w19164
GPS apocalyptic scenario...Frank Reed25 Oct 2004, 12:072518w19162
Re: Lunars with SNO-TGeorge Huxtable25 Oct 2004, 12:006598w19160
Re: Polar Possessions of the SU. was: Lunars with SNO-TGeorge Huxtable25 Oct 2004, 11:594008w19158
Re: Polar Possessions of the SU. was: Lunars with SNO-TFrank Reed25 Oct 2004, 10:292951w19156
Re: Polar Possessions of the SU. was: Lunars with SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko25 Oct 2004, 07:203028w19154
Re: 600 messages this month?Frank Reed25 Oct 2004, 05:423845w19152
Re: Polar Possessions of the SU. was: Lunars with SNO-TJared Sherman25 Oct 2004, 02:532505w19150
Re: Polar Possessions of the SU. was: Lunars with SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko25 Oct 2004, 01:112603w19148
Re: 600 messages this month?Bill B25 Oct 2004, 00:542547w19146
Re: Nautical Almanac UsageBill B24 Oct 2004, 23:342519w19144
Re: Some sailing tales.Bill B24 Oct 2004, 23:303572w19142
Re: Polar Possessions of the SU. was: Lunars with SNO-TFrank Reed24 Oct 2004, 23:322764w19140
Re: Polar Possessions of the SU. was: Lunars with SNO-TBruce Stark24 Oct 2004, 21:592423w19138
Please remove me from the listPaul Houlston24 Oct 2004, 20:363147w19136
Polar Possessions of the SU. was: Lunars with SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko24 Oct 2004, 20:214111w19134
Re: Jan KalivodaBruce Stark24 Oct 2004, 19:192556w19132
Re:       Re: Nautical astronomy was differentBruce Stark24 Oct 2004, 18:593187w19130
Re: Lunars with SNO-TBruce Stark24 Oct 2004, 18:563423w19128
Re: Nautical astronomy was differentAlexandre Eremenko24 Oct 2004, 18:392720w19126
Re: Nautical astronomy was differentBruce Stark24 Oct 2004, 18:0111608w19124
Re: Nautical Almanac UsageKen Gebhart24 Oct 2004, 17:312774w19122
Please remove me from the listlencfly24 Oct 2004, 15:202423w19120
Re: Nautical Almanac UsageFred Hebard24 Oct 2004, 15:022445w19118
Re: averagingFred Hebard24 Oct 2004, 14:553209w19116
Re: Lunars with SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko24 Oct 2004, 14:532957w19114
Re: Lunars with SNO-TFred Hebard24 Oct 2004, 14:392672w19112
Re: Lunars with SNO-TJim Thompson24 Oct 2004, 11:005275w19110
Re: averagingJim Thompson24 Oct 2004, 10:304636w19108
Re: Lunars with SNO-TFrank Reed24 Oct 2004, 10:283827w19106
Re: Lunars with SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko24 Oct 2004, 08:383578w19104
Re: Lunars with SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko24 Oct 2004, 08:143901w19102
Re: Historical questionAlexandre Eremenko24 Oct 2004, 07:542659w19100
Lunars: altitude accuracyFrank Reed24 Oct 2004, 07:343447w19098
600 messages this month?Frank Reed24 Oct 2004, 07:282767w19096
Re: Lunars with SNO-TFrank Reed24 Oct 2004, 07:246026w19094
Re: Historical questionFrank Reed24 Oct 2004, 07:174364w19092
Re: Historical questionFrank Reed24 Oct 2004, 07:114085w19090
Re: Nautical astronomy was differentFrank Reed24 Oct 2004, 07:043950w19088
Re: Nautical Almanac UsageFrank Reed24 Oct 2004, 06:592669w19086
Re: Nautical Almanac UsageFrank Reed24 Oct 2004, 06:572897w19084
Re: Nautical Almanac UsageFrank Reed24 Oct 2004, 06:552878w19082
Re: Nautical astronomy was differentFrank Reed24 Oct 2004, 06:524052w19080
Re: Nautical astronomy was differentFrank Reed24 Oct 2004, 06:463961w19078
Re: Nautical astronomy was differentFrank Reed24 Oct 2004, 06:399541w19076
Re: Nautical astronomy was differentFrank Reed24 Oct 2004, 06:064669w19074
Re: Moon Parallax, Math Trivia (was Re: venus)Frank Reed24 Oct 2004, 06:013929w19072
Lunars with SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko24 Oct 2004, 05:413373w19070
Re: averagingBill B24 Oct 2004, 05:323755w19068
Re: averagingPeter Fogg24 Oct 2004, 03:3312795w19066
Re: Historical questionAlexandre Eremenko24 Oct 2004, 00:044178w19064
Re: Nautical Astronomy was differentBruce Stark23 Oct 2004, 22:174551w19062
Nonlinearity tables, was: AveragingAlexandre Eremenko23 Oct 2004, 21:264907w19060
Jan KalivodaBruce Stark23 Oct 2004, 21:023122w19058
Re: Nautical Almanac UsageKen Gebhart23 Oct 2004, 19:574999w19056
Re: AveragingChuck Taylor23 Oct 2004, 17:562354w19054
Re: AveragingJim Thompson23 Oct 2004, 17:142823w19052
Re: Nautical Almanac UsageGordon Talge23 Oct 2004, 16:494138w19050
Re: Historical questionAlexandre Eremenko23 Oct 2004, 16:352799w19048
Re: Asking Dan HoganDan Hogan23 Oct 2004, 16:173029w19046
Re: Navigational computersJared Sherman23 Oct 2004, 16:003611w19044
Re: AveragingGeorge Huxtable23 Oct 2004, 16:132501w19042
Re: Historical questionGeorge Huxtable23 Oct 2004, 16:033429w19040
Re: Nautical Almanac UsageMichael Dorl23 Oct 2004, 13:373719w19038
Re: KVH DatascopeJohn Shea23 Oct 2004, 13:242971w19036
Re: AveragingJim Thompson23 Oct 2004, 11:038323w19034
Asking Dan HoganJan Kalivoda23 Oct 2004, 10:002174w19032
Re: AveragingAlexandre Eremenko23 Oct 2004, 09:465256w19030
Re: Navigational computersJim Thompson23 Oct 2004, 09:083660w19028
Re: Navigational computersGlendon23 Oct 2004, 08:293524w19026
Re: Navigational computersJim Thompson23 Oct 2004, 08:232978w19024
Re: AveragingJim Thompson23 Oct 2004, 07:523543w19022
Navigational computersLisa Fiene23 Oct 2004, 07:202489w19020
Historical questionAlexandre Eremenko23 Oct 2004, 06:033803w19018
Re: AveragingBill B23 Oct 2004, 05:3622564w19016
Re: AveragingFred Hebard23 Oct 2004, 04:0560049w19014
Re: Nautical Almanac UsageMarc Bernstein23 Oct 2004, 03:412183w19012
Re: AveragingFred Hebard23 Oct 2004, 03:353242w19010
Re: Nautical astronomy was differentKen Muldrew23 Oct 2004, 01:283107w19008
Re: Nautical astronomy was differentTrevor Kenchington22 Oct 2004, 17:234308w19006
Re: AveragingHerbert Prinz23 Oct 2004, 00:242214w19004
Re: AveragingBill B22 Oct 2004, 23:312918w19002
Re: AveragingChuck Taylor22 Oct 2004, 23:313702w19000
Re: Nautical Almanac UsageFred Hebard22 Oct 2004, 23:102851w18998
Arc shapesBill B22 Oct 2004, 22:372657w18996
Re: AveragingAlexandre Eremenko22 Oct 2004, 22:363377w18994
Re: Nautical Almanac UsageLisa Fiene22 Oct 2004, 22:162632w18992
Re: Nautical Almanac UsageAlexandre Eremenko22 Oct 2004, 22:063712w18990
Re: Nautical Almanac UsageAlexandre Eremenko22 Oct 2004, 22:023021w18988
Re: Nautical Almanac UsageKen Gebhart22 Oct 2004, 22:052429w18986
Re: Nautical Almanac UsageAlexandre Eremenko22 Oct 2004, 21:542836w18984
Re: AveragingBill B22 Oct 2004, 21:283675w18982
Re: Nautical Almanac UsageFred Hebard22 Oct 2004, 21:182917w18980
Re: KVH DatascopeCarl Herzog22 Oct 2004, 21:222561w18978
Re: Nautical Almanac UsageHerbert Prinz22 Oct 2004, 21:103227w18976
Re: Nautical Almanac UsageFred Hebard22 Oct 2004, 20:472952w18974
Re: Nautical Almanac UsageBill B22 Oct 2004, 20:432537w18972
FW: KVH DatascopeDoug Royer22 Oct 2004, 20:453433w18970
Re: Nautical Almanac UsageMichael Dorl22 Oct 2004, 20:413308w18968
Re: Nautical Almanac UsageCliff Sojourner22 Oct 2004, 20:411925w18966
Re: Nautical Almanac UsageDan Allen22 Oct 2004, 20:213585w18964
Re: Nautical astronomy was differentKen Muldrew22 Oct 2004, 19:163361w18962
Re: Nautical Almanac UsageFred Hebard22 Oct 2004, 18:582402w18960
Re: Nautical Almanac UsageJared Sherman22 Oct 2004, 18:502735w18958
Re: Nautical astronomy was differentJared Sherman22 Oct 2004, 18:504107w18956
Re: Nautical Almanac UsageMarc Bernstein22 Oct 2004, 18:411969w18954
Nautical Almanac UsageHerbert Prinz22 Oct 2004, 18:232239w18952
Re: AveragingAlexandre Eremenko22 Oct 2004, 17:453776w18950
Re: Nautical astronomy was differentBruce Stark22 Oct 2004, 17:144928w18948
Re: Averaging / KVH DatascopeHerbert Prinz22 Oct 2004, 16:275526w18946
Re: AveragingJim Thompson22 Oct 2004, 10:466350w18944
(no subject)Alexandre Eremenko22 Oct 2004, 06:344554w18942
Re: AveragingAlexandre Eremenko22 Oct 2004, 05:582557w18940
Re: Moon Parallax, Math Trivia (was Re: venus)Herbert Prinz22 Oct 2004, 05:043420w18938
Re: AveragingFred Hebard22 Oct 2004, 01:052762w18936
Re: AveragingHerbert Prinz22 Oct 2004, 00:529658w18934
Re: AveragingBill B22 Oct 2004, 00:232381w18932
Re: AveragingBill B22 Oct 2004, 00:122221w18930
Re: AveragingAlexandre Eremenko21 Oct 2004, 23:462916w18928
Re: AveragingAlexandre Eremenko21 Oct 2004, 23:283321w18926
Re: AveragingBill B21 Oct 2004, 22:224697w18924
Re: AveragingFred Hebard21 Oct 2004, 22:032427w18922
Re: AveragingFred Hebard21 Oct 2004, 21:53187939w18920
Re: AveragingAlexandre Eremenko21 Oct 2004, 21:004610w18918
Re: AveragingHerbert Prinz21 Oct 2004, 20:173568w18916
Re: AveragingJared Sherman21 Oct 2004, 19:192592w18914
Re: Nautical astronomy was differentJared Sherman21 Oct 2004, 19:152906w18912
Re: AveragingHerbert Prinz21 Oct 2004, 19:043647w18910
FW: Passengers 2Doug Royer21 Oct 2004, 18:362363w18908
Re: Nautical astronomy was differentBruce Stark21 Oct 2004, 18:269976w18906
Re: Planning a blue water CN cruise/holidayTrevor Kenchington21 Oct 2004, 11:096630w18904
Re: Compass - southern hemisphere/northern hemisphereTrevor Kenchington20 Oct 2004, 20:202947w18902
Re: AveragingFred Hebard21 Oct 2004, 11:133318w18900
Planning a blue water CN cruise/holidayJim Thompson21 Oct 2004, 10:474860w18898
Re: AveragingJim Thompson21 Oct 2004, 10:312567w18896
Re: AveragingBill B21 Oct 2004, 05:052824w18894
Some sailing tales.Fred Hebard21 Oct 2004, 04:084368w18892
Re: AveragingChuck Taylor21 Oct 2004, 03:462095w18890
Re: AveragingChuck Taylor21 Oct 2004, 03:412118w18888
Re: AveragingFred Hebard21 Oct 2004, 03:142447w18886
Re: AveragingFred Hebard21 Oct 2004, 02:572343w18884
Re: Nautical astronomy was differentFred Hebard21 Oct 2004, 02:512264w18882
PassengersDoug Royer21 Oct 2004, 01:063160w18880
Re: Compass - southern hemisphere/northern hemisphereGlendon21 Oct 2004, 00:464467w18878
Re: AveragingJim Thompson21 Oct 2004, 00:093895w18876
Re: Compass - southern hemisphere/northern hemisphereGeorge Huxtable21 Oct 2004, 00:053251w18874
Re: Moon Parallax, Math Trivia (was Re: venus)George Huxtable20 Oct 2004, 23:424752w18872
Re: Compass - southern hemisphere/northern hemisphereHenry Halboth20 Oct 2004, 23:292917w18870
Re: AveragingBill B20 Oct 2004, 23:093027w18868
Re: Uses of almanacs for astrologyHerbert Prinz20 Oct 2004, 23:123233w18866
Re: Moon Parallax, Math Trivia (was Re: venus)Frank Reed20 Oct 2004, 22:354093w18864
Compass - southern hemisphere/northern hemisphereLisa Fiene20 Oct 2004, 22:302520w18862
Re: Nautical astronomy was differentFrank Reed20 Oct 2004, 22:268658w18860
Re: Moon Parallax, Math Trivia (was Re: venus)Herbert Prinz20 Oct 2004, 22:312841w18858
AveragingDoug Royer20 Oct 2004, 22:193335w18856
Re: AveragingGary LaPook20 Oct 2004, 22:163530w18854
Re: Uses of almanacs for astrologyFrank Reed20 Oct 2004, 21:563280w18852
Re: AveragingFred Hebard20 Oct 2004, 21:122376w18850
Re: Uses of almanacs for astrologyLisa Fiene20 Oct 2004, 20:472986w18848
Re: Moon Parallax, Math Trivia (was Re: venus)Frank Reed20 Oct 2004, 20:197352w18846
Re: AveragingJim Thompson20 Oct 2004, 19:523288w18844
Re: AveragingBill B20 Oct 2004, 19:136356w18842
Re: AveragingFred Hebard20 Oct 2004, 19:08167882w18840
Re: Uses of almanacs for astrologyFred Hebard20 Oct 2004, 18:193645w18838
Re: Uses of almanacs for astrologyHenry Halboth20 Oct 2004, 17:384331w18836
Re: Nautical astronomy was differentBruce Stark20 Oct 2004, 17:167292w18834
Re: Uses of almanacs for astrologyFred Hebard20 Oct 2004, 16:472647w18832
Re: AveragingChuck Taylor20 Oct 2004, 16:375290w18830
Re: Moon Parallax, Math Trivia (was Re: venus)George Huxtable20 Oct 2004, 16:464944w18828
Re: Uses of almanacs for astrologyGeorge Huxtable20 Oct 2004, 16:464921w18826
Re: AveragingChuck Taylor20 Oct 2004, 15:102090w18824
Re: Navigation formula problemPierre Boucher20 Oct 2004, 13:042443w18822
Re: AveragingGary LaPook20 Oct 2004, 10:298969w18820
Moon Parallax, Math Trivia (was Re: venus)Frank Reed20 Oct 2004, 05:305346w18818
Re: Pre-setting sextant; Wulf's Grid.Frank Reed20 Oct 2004, 05:137144w18816
Re: Nautical astronomy was differentFrank Reed20 Oct 2004, 01:567010w18814
Re: Navigation formula problemFrank Reed20 Oct 2004, 01:142505w18812
Re: Uses of almanacs for astrologyFrank Reed20 Oct 2004, 01:145569w18810
Re: venusFrank Reed20 Oct 2004, 00:392863w18808
Re: AveragingJim Theriot20 Oct 2004, 00:183049w18806
Re: Nautical astronomy was differentBruce Stark19 Oct 2004, 23:413832w18804
Re: AveragingPeter Fogg19 Oct 2004, 22:583897w18802
Re: AveragingFred Hebard19 Oct 2004, 21:5646406w18800
Re: AveragingHerbert Prinz19 Oct 2004, 21:323928w18798
Re: AveragingGeorge Huxtable19 Oct 2004, 20:513807w18796
Re: Nautical astronomy was differentHerbert Prinz19 Oct 2004, 20:495405w18794
Re: AveragingJim Thompson19 Oct 2004, 20:353566w18792
Re: AveragingBill B19 Oct 2004, 20:133082w18790
Re: Nautical astronomy was differentDerrick Young19 Oct 2004, 19:433394w18788
Nautical astronomy was differentBruce Stark19 Oct 2004, 19:165559w18786
Re: AveragingHerbert Prinz19 Oct 2004, 18:429648w18784
Re: AveragingChuck Taylor19 Oct 2004, 18:113715w18782
Re: Navigation formula problemTrevor Kenchington19 Oct 2004, 13:543886w18780
Navigation formula problemSam Critchley19 Oct 2004, 16:303041w18778
Re: Manual calculation of compass variationRichard B. Langley19 Oct 2004, 12:585097w18776
Re: 0000 not 2400?Jim Thompson19 Oct 2004, 12:042505w18774
Re: AveragingJim Thompson19 Oct 2004, 11:483003w18772
Re: 0000 not 2400?Jim Thompson19 Oct 2004, 11:482466w18770
Re: 0000 not 2400?Paul Bryans19 Oct 2004, 09:424280w18768
R: R: AveragingFederico Rossi19 Oct 2004, 09:064141w18766
R: R: AveragingFederico Rossi19 Oct 2004, 08:553817w18764
Re: 0000 not 2400?Paul Hirose19 Oct 2004, 05:042428w18762
Re: AveragingAlexandre Eremenko19 Oct 2004, 05:014231w18760
Re: 0000 not 2400?Fred Hebard19 Oct 2004, 01:421979w18758
Re: 0000 not 2400?John Simmonds19 Oct 2004, 01:325667w18756
Re: 0000 not 2400?Jared Sherman19 Oct 2004, 00:382257w18754
Re: R: AveragingBill B19 Oct 2004, 00:284508w18752
Re: 0000 not 2400?Trevor Kenchington18 Oct 2004, 20:244478w18750
Re: Analysis of recreatonal boat grounding incidents?Trevor Kenchington18 Oct 2004, 16:134105w18748
Re: AveragingPeter Fogg18 Oct 2004, 22:543939w18746
Re: R: AveragingGeorge Huxtable18 Oct 2004, 22:432848w18744
Re: 0000 not 2400?Gordon Talge18 Oct 2004, 23:172396w18742
Re: 0000 not 2400?Dave Weilacher18 Oct 2004, 21:103966w18740
Re: 0000 not 2400?Fred Hebard18 Oct 2004, 21:003669w18738
Re: 0000 not 2400?Jared Sherman18 Oct 2004, 20:463139w18736
Re: 0000 not 2400?Derrick Young18 Oct 2004, 20:319596w18734
Re: 0000 not 2400?Jim Thompson18 Oct 2004, 20:232773w18732
Re: 0000 not 2400?Gary LaPook18 Oct 2004, 19:306984w18730
Re: 0000 not 2400?Charles Seitz18 Oct 2004, 19:024387w18728
Re: Ohm's Law 2 1/2Fred Hebard18 Oct 2004, 18:552663w18726
Re: 0000 not 2400?George Huxtable18 Oct 2004, 18:513469w18724
Ohm's Law 2 1/2Doug Royer18 Oct 2004, 17:343022w18722
Re: 0000 not 2400?Charles Seitz18 Oct 2004, 17:113996w18720
Re: 0000 not 2400?Jared Sherman18 Oct 2004, 17:092491w18718
Re: Analysis of recreatonal boat grounding incidents?Jared Sherman18 Oct 2004, 17:062552w18716
Re: 0000 not 2400?Jim Thompson18 Oct 2004, 14:192364w18714
Re: 0000 not 2400?Dan Allen18 Oct 2004, 14:213971w18712
Re: 0000 not 2400?John Simmonds18 Oct 2004, 13:3610246w18710
0000 not 2400?Jim Thompson18 Oct 2004, 11:013501w18708
Analysis of recreatonal boat grounding incidents?Jim Thompson18 Oct 2004, 10:172539w18706
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...Jim Thompson18 Oct 2004, 10:164266w18704
R: AveragingFederico Rossi18 Oct 2004, 07:513217w18702
Re: Auroras/compass readingsTrevor Kenchington17 Oct 2004, 23:183438w18700
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ... - Chart ErrorsTrevor Kenchington17 Oct 2004, 22:344299w18698
Re: Auroras/compass readingsCharles Seitz18 Oct 2004, 01:433152w18696
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ... - Chart ErrorsLisa Fiene18 Oct 2004, 01:047964w18694
Re: Auroras/compass readingsBill B18 Oct 2004, 00:292769w18692
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...Bill B17 Oct 2004, 23:523109w18690
Uses of almanacs for astrologyFred Hebard17 Oct 2004, 22:423147w18688
Re: Manual calculation of compass variationBill B17 Oct 2004, 22:104696w18686
Re: AveragingGeorge Huxtable17 Oct 2004, 21:452163w18684
Re: Manual calculation of compass variationGeorge Huxtable17 Oct 2004, 21:454132w18682
Re: What's really OK here?Bill B17 Oct 2004, 21:302635w18680
Re: Lightning at sea - James Cook - ChainTrevor Kenchington16 Oct 2004, 20:244175w18678
Keeping a log, was: Teaching seamanshipTrevor Kenchington16 Oct 2004, 10:114485w18676
AveragingAlexandre Eremenko17 Oct 2004, 05:294876w18674
Re: Auroras/compass readingsAlexandre Eremenko17 Oct 2004, 05:143950w18672
Re: Manual calculation of compass variationHerbert Prinz17 Oct 2004, 05:012521w18670
Pre-setting sextant; Wulf's Grid.Alexandre Eremenko17 Oct 2004, 04:445051w18668
Auroras/compass readingsLisa Fiene17 Oct 2004, 04:052584w18666
Re: Manual calculation of compass variationLisa Fiene17 Oct 2004, 03:272792w18664
Re: Manual calculation of compass variationHenry Halboth17 Oct 2004, 02:247262w18662
Re: venusHerbert Prinz17 Oct 2004, 01:112402w18660
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...Ken Gebhart17 Oct 2004, 01:022391w18658
Re: Role of CN at seaKen Gebhart17 Oct 2004, 00:573719w18656
Re: venusGeorge Huxtable17 Oct 2004, 00:184114w18654
Re: venusGeorge Huxtable16 Oct 2004, 23:533190w18652
Re: What's really OK here?Dan Allen16 Oct 2004, 22:537655w18650
Re: What's really OK here?Frank Reed16 Oct 2004, 21:483283w18648
Re: Manual calculation of compass variationFrank Reed16 Oct 2004, 21:354169w18646
Re: venusFrank Reed16 Oct 2004, 21:264341w18644
Re: venusFrank Reed16 Oct 2004, 21:242470w18642
Re: Manual calculation of compass variationFrank Reed16 Oct 2004, 20:354260w18640
Re: Manual calculation of compass variationGeorge Huxtable16 Oct 2004, 19:174542w18638
Re: venusHerbert Prinz16 Oct 2004, 16:502104w18636
Re: What's really OK here?Herbert Prinz16 Oct 2004, 16:433050w18634
Re: What's really OK here?Dan Hogan16 Oct 2004, 15:502547w18632
Re: What's really OK here?Fred Hebard16 Oct 2004, 14:572500w18630
Re: Manual calculation of compass variationFred Hebard16 Oct 2004, 14:462939w18628
What's really OK here?Charles Seitz16 Oct 2004, 14:442301w18626
Re: Manual calculation of compass variationHenry Halboth16 Oct 2004, 14:224995w18624
Re: Lightning at sea - James Cook - ChainWilliam Sellar16 Oct 2004, 14:032752w18622
Re: Manual calculation of compass variationRichard B. Langley16 Oct 2004, 13:463593w18620
Re: Manual calculation of compass variationJim Thompson16 Oct 2004, 13:132326w18618
Re: Manual calculation of compass variationRichard B. Langley16 Oct 2004, 12:285714w18616
Re: Manual calculation of compass variationGeorge Huxtable16 Oct 2004, 10:004030w18614
Re: Lightning at sea - James CookGeorge Huxtable16 Oct 2004, 10:002824w18612
Re: Ohm's Law 2George Huxtable16 Oct 2004, 10:006774w18610
Re: Lightning at seaFred Hebard16 Oct 2004, 02:343392w18608
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...Ken Gebhart16 Oct 2004, 02:364468w18606
Re: Lightning at seaTrevor Kenchington15 Oct 2004, 21:395757w18604
Re: [off-topic] Buoy TerminologyTrevor Kenchington15 Oct 2004, 11:444026w18602
Re: Role of CN at seaTrevor Kenchington15 Oct 2004, 11:094239w18600
Re: Manual calculation of compass variationHerbert Prinz16 Oct 2004, 01:532156w18598
Re: Manual calculation of compass variationHerbert Prinz16 Oct 2004, 01:354088w18596
Ohm's Law 2Doug Royer16 Oct 2004, 01:102898w18594
Re: Ohm's Law????????Ken James16 Oct 2004, 00:523332w18592
Phi-Prime,Phi- 2ndDoug Royer16 Oct 2004, 00:502002w18590
Re: Is the date ever the same globally?Gary Harkins16 Oct 2004, 00:414457w18588
Re: Lightning at seaPhil Camera15 Oct 2004, 23:463115w18586
Re: Is the date ever the same globally?Jim Thompson15 Oct 2004, 23:333697w18584
Manual calculation of compass variationLisa Fiene15 Oct 2004, 23:222484w18582
Re: Lightning at seaFred Hebard15 Oct 2004, 23:202573w18580
Re: Lightning at seaFred Hebard15 Oct 2004, 23:132305w18578
Re: Is the date ever the same globally?Jared Sherman15 Oct 2004, 22:552484w18576
Re: Lightning at seaPhil Camera15 Oct 2004, 22:474226w18574
Re: Lightning at sea - James CookLisa Fiene15 Oct 2004, 22:363089w18572
Ohm's Law????????Doug Royer15 Oct 2004, 22:302386w18570
Re: Lightning at seaLisa Fiene15 Oct 2004, 22:263939w18568
Re: Lightning at seaGeorge Huxtable15 Oct 2004, 21:347816w18566
Re: Lightning at seaGeorge Huxtable15 Oct 2004, 21:344251w18564
Re: Sextant sales; was: Role of CN at sea,was Re: Averagingsights ...Bill B15 Oct 2004, 21:133130w18562
Re: Lightning at seaPhil Camera15 Oct 2004, 19:0928588w18560
Hard copy?Derrick Young15 Oct 2004, 18:593306w18558
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...Robert Gainer15 Oct 2004, 18:453918w18556
Re: Sextant sales; was: Role of CN at sea,was Re: Averagingsights ...Dan Hogan15 Oct 2004, 18:202378w18554
Re: Sextant sales; was: Role of CN at sea,was Re: Averaging sights ...George Huxtable15 Oct 2004, 18:153475w18552
Re: Lightning at seaCourtney Thomas15 Oct 2004, 19:2113375w18550
Sight reduction publicationsDoug Royer15 Oct 2004, 17:472703w18548
Re: Lightning at seaPhil Camera15 Oct 2004, 17:2822666w18546
Phi-Prime,Phi-2ndBruce Stark15 Oct 2004, 17:232556w18544
Re: Lightning at seaHenry Halboth15 Oct 2004, 17:104807w18542
Re: Sextant sales; was: Role of CN at sea,was Re: Averaging sights ...Alexandre Eremenko15 Oct 2004, 15:382736w18540
Re: Geometry of SNO-TBill Murdoch15 Oct 2004, 14:497275w18538
Re: Lightning at seaCourtney Thomas15 Oct 2004, 15:5213912w18536
Re: Lightning at seaGeorge Huxtable15 Oct 2004, 14:1012900w18534
Re: Lightning at seaPaul Marcuzzo15 Oct 2004, 10:474715w18532
Re: Is the date ever the same globally?Navastro15 Oct 2004, 10:4721464w18530
Is the date ever the same globally?Jim Thompson15 Oct 2004, 09:373389w18528
Re: Sextant salesJim Thompson15 Oct 2004, 09:212646w18526
Re: Lightning at seaSteve Moss15 Oct 2004, 08:458391w18524
Re: Sextant sales; was: Role of CN at sea,was Re: Averaging sights ...Bill B15 Oct 2004, 08:064649w18522
Re: venus (bug fix)Frank Reed15 Oct 2004, 05:482610w18520
Re: Sextant sales; was: Role of CN at sea,was Re: Averaging sights ...Alexandre Eremenko15 Oct 2004, 04:333172w18518
Re: Sextant sales; was: Role of CN at sea,was Re: Averaging sights ...Ken Gebhart15 Oct 2004, 03:463799w18516
Re: Tamaya sextantsAlexandre Eremenko15 Oct 2004, 02:373225w18514
Re: Lightning at seaAlexandre Eremenko15 Oct 2004, 02:164108w18512
Re: Lightning at seaGary Harkins15 Oct 2004, 01:024443w18510
Re: PFD Stats was Re: On teaching seamanshipBill B15 Oct 2004, 00:522212w18508
Re: Lightning at seaBill B15 Oct 2004, 00:502962w18506
Re: Lightning at seaPeter Fogg15 Oct 2004, 00:452933w18504
Tamaya sextantsDoug Royer15 Oct 2004, 00:353828w18502
Re: PFD Stats was Re: On teaching seamanshipJared Sherman15 Oct 2004, 00:322676w18500
Re: Lightning at seaGary Harkins15 Oct 2004, 00:326120w18498
Re: Sextant sales; was: Role of CN at sea,was Re: Averaging sights ...Bill B14 Oct 2004, 23:433136w18496
Re: Geometry of SNO-TBill B14 Oct 2004, 23:222322w18494
Lightning at seaLisa Fiene14 Oct 2004, 23:203457w18492
Re: PFD Stats was Re: On teaching seamanshipBill B14 Oct 2004, 22:594749w18490
Re: Sextant sales; was: Role of CN at sea,was Re: Averaging sights ...Alexandre Eremenko14 Oct 2004, 22:442794w18488
PFD Stats was Re: On teaching seamanshipDave Weilacher14 Oct 2004, 21:463378w18486
Re: On teaching seamanshipBill B14 Oct 2004, 21:302723w18484
Re: Teaching seamanshipDerrick Young14 Oct 2004, 21:2711028w18482
Re: Teaching seamanshipDave Weilacher14 Oct 2004, 21:234612w18480
Re: Sextant sales; was: Role of CN at sea,was Re: Averaging sights ...Bill B14 Oct 2004, 20:572907w18478
Re: Teaching seamanshipFrank Reed14 Oct 2004, 20:194767w18476
Derrick......Doug Royer14 Oct 2004, 20:002342w18474
Re: Teaching seamanshipDerrick Young14 Oct 2004, 19:057871w18472
Re: ColumbusPeter Smith14 Oct 2004, 18:212893w18470
FW:On teaching seamanshipDoug Royer14 Oct 2004, 18:214832w18468
ColumbusAlexandre Eremenko14 Oct 2004, 17:583577w18466
Re: Sextant sales; was: Role of CN at sea,was Re: Averaging sights ...Alexandre Eremenko14 Oct 2004, 17:422645w18464
Re: Sextant mirror stabilityBruce Stark14 Oct 2004, 17:393623w18462
Re: Geometry of SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko14 Oct 2004, 17:363201w18460
Re: Geometry of SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko14 Oct 2004, 17:217895w18458
Re: Geometry of SNO-THerbert Prinz14 Oct 2004, 17:252768w18456
Re: Geometry of SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko14 Oct 2004, 16:362469w18454
Re: Teaching seamanshipCarl Herzog14 Oct 2004, 16:384522w18452
Re: Geometry of SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko14 Oct 2004, 16:253230w18450
Re: Sextant sales; was: Role of CN at sea,was Re: Averaging sights ...Carl Herzog14 Oct 2004, 15:543932w18448
Re: Side Error Adjustment in the Horizon Mirror - Soviet CHO-TLisa Fiene14 Oct 2004, 15:214998w18446
Re: Geometry of SNO-THerbert Prinz14 Oct 2004, 12:484478w18444
Re: Side Error Adjustment in the Horizon Mirror - Soviet CHO-TGeorge Huxtable14 Oct 2004, 12:133602w18442
Re: Geometry of SNO-TGeorge Huxtable14 Oct 2004, 12:133432w18440
Re: DR navigation in the recreatiional fleet: was Role of CN atseaJim Thompson14 Oct 2004, 09:312403w18438
Re: Teaching seamanshipJim Thompson14 Oct 2004, 09:314446w18436
Re: Geometry of SNO-THerbert Prinz14 Oct 2004, 05:204267w18434
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...Ken Gebhart14 Oct 2004, 03:535507w18432
Re: Role of CNFred Hebard14 Oct 2004, 03:462333w18430
Sextant mirror stabilityFred Hebard14 Oct 2004, 03:313241w18428
Re: Geometry of SNO-TBill B14 Oct 2004, 03:194193w18426
Re: Role of CNAlexandre Eremenko14 Oct 2004, 02:422909w18424
Re: Role of CNBill B14 Oct 2004, 02:183480w18422
Re: [off-topic] Buoy TerminologyLu Abel14 Oct 2004, 00:163161w18420
Re: Perpendicularity and other qstns.Bill B14 Oct 2004, 01:382103w18418
Re: history of navigation was GPSBill B14 Oct 2004, 01:364597w18416
Re: Role of CN at seaGlendon14 Oct 2004, 01:215725w18414
Re: DR navigation in the recreatiional fleet: was Role of CN atseaJohn Kabel14 Oct 2004, 01:157876w18412
Re: Teaching seamanshipLisa Fiene14 Oct 2004, 01:104266w18410
Teaching seamanshipDoug Royer14 Oct 2004, 00:483055w18408
Re: venusFrank Reed14 Oct 2004, 00:405082w18406
Re: venusMichael Dorl14 Oct 2004, 00:213301w18404
Re: Perpendicularity and other qstns.Alexandre Eremenko14 Oct 2004, 00:162898w18402
Re: Role of CNJim Thompson14 Oct 2004, 00:112416w18400
Re: Side Error Adjustment in the Horizon Mirror - Soviet CHO-TAlexandre Eremenko14 Oct 2004, 00:082991w18398
Re: Perpendicularity and other qstns.Frank Reed14 Oct 2004, 00:053918w18396
Re: Role of CNAlexandre Eremenko14 Oct 2004, 00:003541w18394
Re: DR navigation in the recreatiional fleet: was Role of CN atseaJim Thompson13 Oct 2004, 23:554572w18392
Re: Side Error Adjustment in the Horizon Mirror - Soviet CHO-TLisa Fiene13 Oct 2004, 23:454520w18390
Geometry of SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko13 Oct 2004, 23:326771w18388
Role of CNBruce Stark13 Oct 2004, 23:275411w18386
Re: Side Error Adjustment in the Horizon Mirror - Soviet CHO-TAlexandre Eremenko13 Oct 2004, 23:193699w18384
Re: history of navigation was GPSHerbert Prinz13 Oct 2004, 23:242457w18382
Side Error Adjustment in the Horizon Mirror - Soviet CHO-TLisa Fiene13 Oct 2004, 22:582645w18380
Re: venusGeorge Huxtable13 Oct 2004, 22:566631w18378
Re: DR navigation in the recreatiional fleet: was Role of CN atseaLisa Fiene13 Oct 2004, 22:317429w18376
Re: history of navigation was GPSBill B13 Oct 2004, 22:232534w18374
Re: Role of CN at seaMarc Bernstein13 Oct 2004, 22:151992w18372
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...Bill B13 Oct 2004, 22:002874w18370
GPSHerbert Prinz13 Oct 2004, 22:014072w18368
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...Alexandre Eremenko13 Oct 2004, 21:252795w18366
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...Jared Sherman13 Oct 2004, 21:172729w18364
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...Bill B13 Oct 2004, 21:156174w18362
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...Derrick Young13 Oct 2004, 21:075475w18360
Re: Perpendicularity and other qstns.Alexandre Eremenko13 Oct 2004, 21:075332w18358
Venus with Earth Oblateness - 3rd time a charm?Michael Dorl13 Oct 2004, 20:094617w18356
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...Dave Weilacher13 Oct 2004, 19:433502w18354
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...Carl Herzog13 Oct 2004, 19:363101w18352
Venus with Earth OblatenessMichael Dorl13 Oct 2004, 19:247478w18350
Re: venusMichael Dorl13 Oct 2004, 17:358104w18348
Re: Perpendicularity and other qstns.Herbert Prinz13 Oct 2004, 19:093513w18346
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...George Huxtable13 Oct 2004, 19:062872w18344
Re: venusGeorge Huxtable13 Oct 2004, 18:502232w18342
Re: Perpendicularity and other qstns.Herbert Prinz13 Oct 2004, 17:543398w18340
Re: Perpendicularity and other qstns.Alexandre Eremenko13 Oct 2004, 17:203502w18338
Re: Perpendicularity and other qstns.Herbert Prinz13 Oct 2004, 17:062767w18336
Re: Role of CN at seaDan Allen13 Oct 2004, 16:474337w18334
Re: Role of CN at seaJared Sherman13 Oct 2004, 16:353265w18332
Re: DR navigation in the recreatiional fleet: was Role of CN at seaJared Sherman13 Oct 2004, 16:242944w18330
Re: DR navigation in the recreatiional fleet: was Role of CN atseaCarl Herzog13 Oct 2004, 16:285631w18328
Re: [off-topic] Buoy TerminologyJared Sherman13 Oct 2004, 15:542433w18326
Re: venusMichael Dorl13 Oct 2004, 15:487577w18324
Re: DR navigation in the recreatiional fleet: was Role of CN at seaDerrick Young13 Oct 2004, 15:356621w18322
Re: DR navigation in the recreatiional fleet: was Role of CN at seaPeter Smith13 Oct 2004, 15:324498w18320
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...Marc Bernstein13 Oct 2004, 15:262127w18318
Re: Role of CN at seaDan Allen13 Oct 2004, 14:403386w18316
Re: DR navigation in the recreatiional fleet: was Role of CN atseaDave Weilacher13 Oct 2004, 12:117826w18314
Re: DR navigation in the recreatiional fleet: was Role of CN atseaJim Thompson13 Oct 2004, 11:335848w18312
Re: venusFrank Reed13 Oct 2004, 11:015890w18310
R: Role of CN at seaFederico Rossi13 Oct 2004, 10:443390w18308
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...George Huxtable13 Oct 2004, 10:146406w18306
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...Alexandre Eremenko13 Oct 2004, 07:162890w18304
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...Lisa Fiene13 Oct 2004, 07:055746w18302
Re: venusFrank Reed13 Oct 2004, 07:003980w18300
Perpendicularity and SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko13 Oct 2004, 06:543717w18298
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...Frank Reed13 Oct 2004, 06:357521w18296
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...Nels Tomlinson13 Oct 2004, 06:344370w18294
Re: Perpendicularity and other qstns.Frank Reed13 Oct 2004, 06:058266w18292
Re: [off-topic] Buoy TerminologyLu Abel13 Oct 2004, 05:392413w18290
Re: Perpendicularity and other qstns.Frank Reed13 Oct 2004, 05:349429w18288
Re: Norie on line. Was: Perp procedureFrank Reed13 Oct 2004, 04:405223w18286
Re: [off-topic] Buoy TerminologyKen James13 Oct 2004, 03:462466w18284
[off-topic] Buoy TerminologyLu Abel12 Oct 2004, 23:303130w18282
Perpendicularity and other qstns.Alexandre Eremenko13 Oct 2004, 00:487786w18280
Re: Norie on line. Was: Perp procedureBill B13 Oct 2004, 00:182144w18278
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...Bill B13 Oct 2004, 00:153918w18276
Re: PerpendicularityHerbert Prinz13 Oct 2004, 00:052970w18274
Norie on line. Was: Perp procedureAlexandre Eremenko12 Oct 2004, 23:062967w18272
Re: PerpendicularityGeorge Huxtable12 Oct 2004, 23:075786w18270
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...Nels Tomlinson12 Oct 2004, 22:343841w18268
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...Peter Fogg12 Oct 2004, 22:384889w18266
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...Lisa Fiene12 Oct 2004, 22:183429w18264
Re: Tamaya MS-733 manualBill B12 Oct 2004, 22:072342w18262
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...Jim Thompson12 Oct 2004, 22:062924w18260
Re: Perp procedureBill B12 Oct 2004, 21:582169w18258
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...Herbert Prinz12 Oct 2004, 22:002877w18256
Re: PerpendicularityGary Harkins12 Oct 2004, 21:444583w18254
Re: PerpendicularityHerbert Prinz12 Oct 2004, 21:392257w18252
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...Lisa Fiene12 Oct 2004, 21:195498w18250
Re: Front/vs/rear silvering [was: Re:Tamaya MS-733 manua l] ÞÞÞÞÞGary Harkins12 Oct 2004, 21:004899w18248
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...Carl Herzog12 Oct 2004, 18:334494w18246
Astra IIIb mirror assembliesDoug Royer12 Oct 2004, 20:543111w18244
Re: perpendicularityHerbert Prinz12 Oct 2004, 20:484353w18242
Re: PerpendicularityCliff Sojourner12 Oct 2004, 20:252411w18240
Front/vs/rear silvering [was: Re:Tamaya MS-733 manual] ÞÞÞÞÞJared Sherman12 Oct 2004, 20:113707w18238
Re: PerpendicularityHerbert Prinz12 Oct 2004, 19:362367w18236
Re: Phi-Prime,Phi-2nd and perpendicularityBruce Stark12 Oct 2004, 19:042476w18234
Phi-Prime,Phi-2nd and perpendicularityDoug Royer12 Oct 2004, 18:573021w18232
Re: PerpendicularityBruce Stark12 Oct 2004, 18:555181w18230
Re: PerpendicularityGeorge Huxtable12 Oct 2004, 18:455002w18228
Re: PerpendicularityGeorge Huxtable12 Oct 2004, 18:133026w18226
Tamaya MS-733 manualDoug Royer12 Oct 2004, 16:574033w18224
Re:       Re: † † † Re: Adjusting perpedi cularity of the Index MirrorBruce Stark12 Oct 2004, 15:514575w18222
Re: Perpendicularity again. was: Adjusting Central MirrorJim Thompson12 Oct 2004, 14:222824w18220
Re: Perpendicularity again. was: Adjusting Central MirrorHerbert Prinz12 Oct 2004, 14:172488w18218
Re: Perpendicularity again. was: Adjusting Central MirrorHerbert Prinz12 Oct 2004, 14:016549w18216
Re: Perpendicularity again. was: Adjusting Central MirrorJim Thompson12 Oct 2004, 13:042720w18214
Re: Perp procedureAlexandre Eremenko12 Oct 2004, 04:023228w18212
Re: Perpendicularity again. was: Adjusting Central MirrorAlexandre Eremenko12 Oct 2004, 03:452528w18210
Re: Perp procedureJared Sherman12 Oct 2004, 03:422657w18208
Re:Re:       Re: Adjusting perpedicularity of the Index MirrorAlexandre Eremenko12 Oct 2004, 03:414372w18206
Re: Perpendicularity again. was: Adjusting Central MirrorAlexandre Eremenko12 Oct 2004, 03:212646w18204
Re: Perp procedureAlexandre Eremenko12 Oct 2004, 03:182814w18202
Re: Perpendicularity again. was: Adjusting Central MirrorMichael Dorl12 Oct 2004, 02:034409w18200
Re: Perpendicularity again. was: Adjusting Central MirrorGary Harkins12 Oct 2004, 01:134593w18198
Re: Perpendicularity again. was: Adjusting Central MirrorGary Harkins12 Oct 2004, 01:083824w18196
Re: Perpendicularity again. was: Adjusting Central MirrorBruce Stark12 Oct 2004, 00:092680w18194
Re:       Re: Adjusting perpedicularity of the Index MirrorBruce Stark12 Oct 2004, 00:024380w18192
Re: Perpendicularity again. was: Adjusting Central MirrorJim Thompson11 Oct 2004, 23:393113w18190
Perp procedureDoug Royer11 Oct 2004, 23:342214w18188
Re: Adjusting perpedicularity of the Index MirrorAlexandre Eremenko11 Oct 2004, 23:133804w18186
Perpendicularity again. was: Adjusting Central MirrorAlexandre Eremenko11 Oct 2004, 23:045553w18184
Adjusting perpedicularity of the Index MirrorDoug Royer11 Oct 2004, 23:032403w18182
Adjusting Central MirrorBruce Stark11 Oct 2004, 22:115170w18180
Re:       Re: Ex-Meridian AltitudeBruce Stark11 Oct 2004, 18:282638w18178
Re: Ex-Meridian AltitudeBruce Stark11 Oct 2004, 18:202648w18176
Ex-Meridian AltitudeDoug Royer11 Oct 2004, 17:282852w18174
Re: venusGeorge Huxtable11 Oct 2004, 16:126901w18172
Re: venusMichael Dorl11 Oct 2004, 02:023979w18170
Re: Inverting ScopeLisa Fiene11 Oct 2004, 01:312904w18168
Re: CHO-T inverting scopeAlexandre Eremenko10 Oct 2004, 23:573964w18166
Re: Inverting ScopeBruce Stark10 Oct 2004, 23:112965w18164
Re: Inverting ScopeBruce Stark10 Oct 2004, 22:423739w18162
Re: Sun SD, Sextant precision, SNO-THerbert Prinz10 Oct 2004, 22:512493w18160
Re: Sun SD, Sextant precision, SNO-TBruce Stark10 Oct 2004, 21:532330w18158
Re: Sun SD, Sextant precision, SNO-TLisa Fiene10 Oct 2004, 21:495193w18156
Re: venusFred Hebard10 Oct 2004, 21:392790w18154
Sun SD, Sextant precision, SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko10 Oct 2004, 21:124543w18152
Re: venusGeorge Huxtable10 Oct 2004, 19:126465w18150
Re: venusHerbert Prinz10 Oct 2004, 19:093140w18148
Re: venusMichael Dorl10 Oct 2004, 16:343459w18146
Re: Inverting ScopeBruce Stark10 Oct 2004, 15:446253w18144
Re: Inverting ScopeAlexandre Eremenko10 Oct 2004, 15:143233w18142
Re: Inverting ScopeCourtney Thomas10 Oct 2004, 14:023664w18140
CHO-T inverting scopeLisa Fiene10 Oct 2004, 06:592442w18138
Re: Inverting ScopeAlexandre Eremenko10 Oct 2004, 04:115805w18136
Inverting ScopeBruce Stark10 Oct 2004, 01:255451w18134
Sextant accuracy & lunars (re: venus)Frank Reed9 Oct 2004, 23:4010462w18132
Re: AveragingHerbert Prinz9 Oct 2004, 23:188112w18130
Re: Lunar Observation & Time Sight (1825)Frank Reed9 Oct 2004, 22:493674w18128
Re: PointersBill B9 Oct 2004, 22:093911w18126
Re: Precision, AveragingFrank Reed9 Oct 2004, 22:053103w18124
Re: venusFrank Reed9 Oct 2004, 22:014135w18122
Re: venusFrank Reed9 Oct 2004, 21:567719w18120
Re: PointersFrank Reed9 Oct 2004, 21:285501w18118
Re: PointersBill B9 Oct 2004, 19:473466w18116
Re: venusGeorge Huxtable9 Oct 2004, 19:537766w18114
Re: PointersGeorge Huxtable9 Oct 2004, 19:533548w18112
Precision, AveragingAlexandre Eremenko9 Oct 2004, 17:365716w18110
Re: venusAlexandre Eremenko9 Oct 2004, 16:382754w18108
Re: venusMichael Dorl9 Oct 2004, 16:302976w18106
Re: PointersMike Burkes9 Oct 2004, 16:039659w18104
Re: PointersFred Hebard9 Oct 2004, 16:014915w18102
Re: averaging devices on sextantsFred Hebard9 Oct 2004, 15:172749w18100
Re: AveragingPierre Boucher9 Oct 2004, 14:172126w18098
Re: venusAlexandre Eremenko9 Oct 2004, 13:463810w18096
PointersAlexandre Eremenko9 Oct 2004, 13:334561w18094
Re: venusJim Thompson9 Oct 2004, 13:132516w18092
VenusMichael Dorl9 Oct 2004, 12:513182w18090
Re: AveragingJim Thompson9 Oct 2004, 02:243044w18088
Re: averaging devices on sextantsKen Gebhart9 Oct 2004, 02:103934w18086
Re: averaging devices on sextantsKen Gebhart9 Oct 2004, 02:007023w18084
Re: AveragingAlexandre Eremenko9 Oct 2004, 01:524039w18082
Re: AveragingBill B8 Oct 2004, 23:1910274w18080
Re: averaging devices on sextantsGeorge Huxtable8 Oct 2004, 17:225509w18078
Re: Sight Reduction by the Cosine Haversine MethodAlexandre Eremenko8 Oct 2004, 14:142929w18076
Re: averaging devices on sextantsAlexandre Eremenko8 Oct 2004, 14:063459w18074
Re: averaging devices on sextantsGeorge Huxtable8 Oct 2004, 13:175439w18072
Re: averaging devices on sextantsKen Gebhart8 Oct 2004, 04:087644w18070
Re: AveragingFred Hebard8 Oct 2004, 03:342603w18068
Re: AveragingJared Sherman8 Oct 2004, 01:283256w18066
Re: Averaging sights on commercial vesselsTrevor Kenchington7 Oct 2004, 21:224610w18064
Re: averaging devices on sextantsPaul Hirose7 Oct 2004, 23:435106w18062
Re: Averaging sights on commercial vesselsStacy Hanna7 Oct 2004, 23:362865w18060
Re: Averaging sights on commercial vesselsAlexandre Eremenko7 Oct 2004, 23:252662w18058
Re: Averaging sights on commercial vesselsStacy Hanna7 Oct 2004, 22:493158w18056
Re: Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...C.L. Holm7 Oct 2004, 22:2113252w18054
Re: Averaging sights on commercial vesselsAlexandre Eremenko7 Oct 2004, 22:172790w18052
Re: Sight Reduction by the Cosine Haversine MethodGeorge Huxtable7 Oct 2004, 22:223188w18050
Role of CN at sea, was Re: Averaging sights ...Jim Thompson7 Oct 2004, 22:044680w18048
Re: Sight Reduction by the Cosine Haversine MethodHerbert Prinz7 Oct 2004, 20:533556w18046
Russian(Soviet)sextant in the merchy fleetDoug Royer7 Oct 2004, 20:074013w18044
Re: Averaging sights on commercial vesselsTrevor Kenchington7 Oct 2004, 16:554313w18042
Re: AveragingMichael Dorl7 Oct 2004, 19:115540w18040
Re: Averaging sights on commercial vesselsAlexandre Eremenko7 Oct 2004, 18:595527w18038
Averaging sights on commercial vesselsDoug Royer7 Oct 2004, 18:004407w18036
Re: AveragingAlexandre Eremenko7 Oct 2004, 15:263042w18034
Re: AveragingJoel Jacobs7 Oct 2004, 14:589708w18032
Re: AveragingMichael Dorl7 Oct 2004, 11:583067w18030
AveragingAlexandre Eremenko7 Oct 2004, 04:454607w18028
Re: Chauvenet's "Suggestions to US Naval Officers" (1868)Frank Reed7 Oct 2004, 01:143584w18026
Re: Chauvenet's "Suggestions to US Naval Officers" (1868)Glendon7 Oct 2004, 00:266113w18024
Chauvenet paper.George Huxtable6 Oct 2004, 23:212457w18022
Re: Sight Reduction by the Cosine Haversine MethodGeorge Huxtable6 Oct 2004, 23:214347w18020
Chauvenet's "Suggestions to US Naval Officers" (1868)Frank Reed6 Oct 2004, 22:064030w18018
Re: Sight Reduction by the Cosine Haversine MethodChuck Taylor6 Oct 2004, 20:482268w18016
Re: Sight Reduction by the Cosine Haversine MethodHerbert Prinz6 Oct 2004, 19:505098w18014
Re: Russian trickJared Sherman6 Oct 2004, 00:462849w18012
Re: Sextant precision, SNO-TCourtney Thomas5 Oct 2004, 14:032642w18010
Re: Sextant precision, SNO-TCourtney Thomas5 Oct 2004, 14:013249w18008
Re: Sextant precisionHenry Halboth5 Oct 2004, 04:109066w18006
Re: Sextant precision, SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko5 Oct 2004, 04:013045w18004
Re: Sextant precision, SNO-TFred Hebard5 Oct 2004, 03:592296w18002
Re: Russian trickAlexandre Eremenko5 Oct 2004, 03:412411w18000
Re: Sextant precision, SNO-TCourtney Thomas5 Oct 2004, 02:095261w17998
Re: Russian trickRobert Gainer5 Oct 2004, 01:143009w17996
Re: Sextant precision, SNO-TFred Hebard4 Oct 2004, 23:294146w17994
Re: Sextant precision, SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko4 Oct 2004, 22:084447w17992
Re: Sextant precision, SNO-TFred Hebard4 Oct 2004, 21:327283w17990
Re: Sextant precision, SNO-TAlexandre Eremenko4 Oct 2004, 20:365116w17988
Re: Russian trickFred Hebard4 Oct 2004, 12:443129w17986
Re: Sextant precisionFred Hebard4 Oct 2004, 12:396952w17984
Re: Sextant precisionAlexandre Eremenko4 Oct 2004, 05:053765w17982
Re: Russian trickAlexandre Eremenko4 Oct 2004, 04:393512w17980
Re: Sextant precisionHenry Halboth4 Oct 2004, 03:375984w17978
Re: Russian trickRobert Gainer4 Oct 2004, 02:146127w17976
Re: Russian trickAlexandre Eremenko4 Oct 2004, 01:275425w17974
Re: Sextant precisionJared Sherman4 Oct 2004, 00:413228w17972
Re: Russian trickRobert Gainer3 Oct 2004, 23:444516w17970
Russian trickAlexandre Eremenko3 Oct 2004, 23:303996w17968
Re: Sight Reduction by the Cosine Haversine MethodGordon Talge3 Oct 2004, 21:516385w17966
Re: Your opinion pleaseAlexandre Eremenko3 Oct 2004, 19:114658w17964
Sextant precisionAlexandre Eremenko3 Oct 2004, 16:003575w17962
Your opinion pleasePierre Boucher3 Oct 2004, 15:262486w17960
Re: Sight Reduction by the Cosine Haversine MethodGeorge Huxtable3 Oct 2004, 14:057706w17958
Sight Reduction by the Cosine Haversine MethodChuck Taylor3 Oct 2004, 05:385379w17956
Re: Sextant precisionRobert Gainer2 Oct 2004, 14:234535w17954
Re: Lunars in 1766Alexandre Eremenko2 Oct 2004, 09:243664w17952
Re: Lunars in 1766George Huxtable2 Oct 2004, 08:278568w17950
Re: Lunars in 1766Alexandre Eremenko2 Oct 2004, 05:425191w17948
Re: Lunars in 1766George Huxtable1 Oct 2004, 22:568274w17946
Re: 19th Century Bowditch on line?Alexandre Eremenko1 Oct 2004, 21:072491w17944
19th Century Bowditch on line?Chuck Taylor1 Oct 2004, 18:072133w17942
Re: Octant precisionAlexandre Eremenko1 Oct 2004, 17:053573w17940
Re: Octant precision, was: Sextant precisionAlexandre Eremenko1 Oct 2004, 15:332977w17938
Re: Time recording,Russian manuals, etc.Alexandre Eremenko1 Oct 2004, 15:152782w17936
Re: Octant precision, was: Sextant precisionGeorge Huxtable1 Oct 2004, 14:589299w17934
Re: Time recording,Russian manuals, etc.Jan Kalivoda1 Oct 2004, 08:113509w17932
Lunars in 1766Alexandre Eremenko1 Oct 2004, 06:494449w17930
Octant precision, was: Sextant precisionAlexandre Eremenko1 Oct 2004, 04:423691w17928
Re: time recording, was: Satr-to-starFred Hebard1 Oct 2004, 02:002569w17926
Re: star-to-star distancesFred Hebard1 Oct 2004, 01:262685w17924
Re: star-to-star distancesFred Hebard1 Oct 2004, 01:166039w17922
Re: Chauvenet's "Astronomy"Alexandre Eremenko1 Oct 2004, 00:512637w17920
Time recording, was: Satr-to-starAlexandre Eremenko1 Oct 2004, 00:493337w17918
Re: Chauvenet's "Astronomy"Frank Reed1 Oct 2004, 00:322803w17916
Re: Sextant precisionJared Sherman1 Oct 2004, 00:305901w17914
Time recording,Russian manuals, etc.Alexandre Eremenko1 Oct 2004, 00:264750w17912
Re: star-to-star distancesJared Sherman1 Oct 2004, 00:123842w17910
Re: star-to-star distancesJared Sherman1 Oct 2004, 00:226322w17908
Re: star-to-star distancesAlexandre Eremenko30 Sep 2004, 23:384960w17906
Re: star-to-star distancesFred Hebard30 Sep 2004, 22:074694w17904
Re: star-to-star distancesJan Kalivoda30 Sep 2004, 21:333997w17902
Re: star-to-star distancesAlexandre Eremenko30 Sep 2004, 20:213714w17900
Re: star-to-star distancesAlexandre Eremenko30 Sep 2004, 20:042559w17898
Chauvenet's "Astronomy"George Huxtable30 Sep 2004, 19:373000w17896
Re: star-to-star distancesFred Hebard30 Sep 2004, 19:152517w17894
Re: star-to-star distancesBill Noyce30 Sep 2004, 19:113188w17892
Re: star-to-star distancesKen Muldrew30 Sep 2004, 19:022901w17890
Re: Sextant precisionGeorge Huxtable30 Sep 2004, 19:124821w17888
Re: star-to-star distancesBrooke Clarke30 Sep 2004, 18:508051w17886
Re: star-to-star distancesAlexandre Eremenko30 Sep 2004, 18:334177w17884
Re: star-to-star distancesBrooke Clarke30 Sep 2004, 16:352655w17882
Re: Artificial horizon: firm base needed.[was Your Mail]Jan Kalivoda30 Sep 2004, 15:436533w17880
Re: Sextant precisionAlexandre Eremenko30 Sep 2004, 15:384912w17878
Re: Sextant precisionRobert Gainer30 Sep 2004, 14:274353w17876
Re: Artificial horizon: firm base needed.[was Your Mail]Alexandre Eremenko30 Sep 2004, 13:573727w17874
Re: Sextant precisionAlexandre Eremenko30 Sep 2004, 13:372661w17872
Re: star-to-star distancesAlexandre Eremenko30 Sep 2004, 13:263742w17870
Re: star-to-star distancesFred Hebard30 Sep 2004, 12:323819w17868
Artificial horizon: firm base needed.[was Your Mail]George Huxtable30 Sep 2004, 11:463357w17866
Re: Sextant precisionGeorge Huxtable30 Sep 2004, 11:466604w17864
Re: Lunar Observation & Time Sight (1825)Jan Kalivoda30 Sep 2004, 10:433066w17862
Re: Lunar Observation & Time Sight (1825)Jim Thompson30 Sep 2004, 10:126676w17860
Re: star-to-star distancesAlexandre Eremenko30 Sep 2004, 02:573667w17858
Lunar Observation & Time Sight (1825)Frank Reed30 Sep 2004, 02:303083w17856
Re: star-to-star distancesFred Hebard30 Sep 2004, 01:192766w17854
Re: star-to-star distancesJared Sherman30 Sep 2004, 00:413605w17852
Re: star-to-star distancesFred Hebard29 Sep 2004, 22:535262w17850
Re: star-to-star distancesAlexandre Eremenko29 Sep 2004, 22:124789w17848
Re: star-to-star distancesFred Hebard29 Sep 2004, 21:442457w17846
Re: star-to-star distancesFred Hebard29 Sep 2004, 21:354939w17844
Re: star-to-star distancesAlexandre Eremenko29 Sep 2004, 21:062467w17842
Re: Sextant precisionAlexandre Eremenko29 Sep 2004, 21:004192w17840
Re: star-to-star distancesFred Hebard29 Sep 2004, 20:392241w17838
Re: your mailAlexandre Eremenko29 Sep 2004, 20:304978w17836
Star-to-star distancesAlexandre Eremenko29 Sep 2004, 20:027433w17834
Sextant precisionGeorge Huxtable29 Sep 2004, 20:046966w17832
(no subject)Fred Hebard29 Sep 2004, 18:596279w17830
(no subject)Alexandre Eremenko29 Sep 2004, 16:464087w17828
Re: Time Sight ComputationsChuck Taylor29 Sep 2004, 15:242732w17826
Re: Time Sight ComputationsGeorge Huxtable29 Sep 2004, 14:152908w17824
Re: Server actionDan Hogan29 Sep 2004, 12:504019w17822
Re: Time Sight ComputationsZorbec Legras29 Sep 2004, 11:073249w17820
Re: Time Sight ComputationsGeorge Huxtable29 Sep 2004, 11:035666w17818
Re: Time Sight ComputationsJim Thompson29 Sep 2004, 09:533359w17816
Re: Time Sight ComputationsChuck Taylor29 Sep 2004, 01:262656w17814
Time sight of the sun, a navigator's morsel.Zorbec Legras28 Sep 2004, 23:023545w17812
Re: estimated positionPeter Fogg28 Sep 2004, 22:492917w17810
Re: Time Sight ComputationsJan Kalivoda28 Sep 2004, 22:142203w17808
Re: estimated positionJan Kalivoda28 Sep 2004, 22:083416w17806
Re: Time Sight ComputationsGeorge Huxtable28 Sep 2004, 20:303379w17804
(no subject)Russell Sher28 Sep 2004, 18:262612w17802
Re: Irradiation; [was "Star sparkle in sextant image"]George Huxtable28 Sep 2004, 17:403548w17800
Hurricane JeanneJoel Jacobs28 Sep 2004, 15:414977w17798
Re: Time Sight ComputationsHenry Halboth28 Sep 2004, 14:406259w17796
Re: estimated positionDerrick Young28 Sep 2004, 12:185528w17794
Re: Irradiation; [was "Star sparkle in sextant image"]Jim Thompson28 Sep 2004, 12:202923w17792
Re: Time Sight ComputationsJim Thompson28 Sep 2004, 11:582506w17790
Re: Time Sight ComputationsZorbec Legras28 Sep 2004, 09:243620w17788
Time Sight ComputationsChuck Taylor28 Sep 2004, 01:094555w17786
Re: Star sparkle in sextant imageKen Gebhart27 Sep 2004, 22:033062w17784
Re: Definition of estimated position?Fred Hebard27 Sep 2004, 21:142315w17782
Re: Star sparkle in sextant imageFred Hebard27 Sep 2004, 21:082829w17780
Estimated position - thanksRussell Sher27 Sep 2004, 20:462210w17778
Re: Star sparkle in sextant imageJim Thompson27 Sep 2004, 19:247683w17776
Re: Star sparkle in sextant imageJared Sherman27 Sep 2004, 17:346335w17774
Intersecting position circles. (was "Sun sights by 13 year-olds")George Huxtable27 Sep 2004, 17:115541w17772
Irradiation; [was "Star sparkle in sextant image"]George Huxtable27 Sep 2004, 17:114083w17770
Re: Sun sights by 13 year-oldsMichael Dorl27 Sep 2004, 16:553694w17768
Re: Definition of estimated position?Joel Jacobs27 Sep 2004, 16:408602w17766
Re: Star sparkle in sextant imageKen Gebhart27 Sep 2004, 14:546239w17764
Re: Sun sights by 13 year-oldsCharles Seitz27 Sep 2004, 14:284551w17762
Re: Star sparkle in sextant imageFred Hebard27 Sep 2004, 12:495223w17760
Star sparkle in sextant imageJim Thompson27 Sep 2004, 11:483269w17756
Re: Lunars: series vs. triangle methodsJan Kalivoda27 Sep 2004, 10:525431w17754
Lunars: methods, methods, methods...Frank Reed27 Sep 2004, 03:303726w17752
Re: Russian Star GlobeAlexandre Eremenko27 Sep 2004, 03:282981w17750
Lunars: Maskelyne's method (1764)Frank Reed27 Sep 2004, 03:252405w17748
Re: Lunars: series vs. triangle methodsFrank Reed27 Sep 2004, 03:244869w17746
Re: About French (in)accuracy.Frank Reed27 Sep 2004, 02:502956w17744
Re: Time sights for Jim TFrank Reed27 Sep 2004, 02:454491w17742
(no subject)Ken Gebhart27 Sep 2004, 02:437232w17740
Re: Lunars: series vs. triangle methodsFred Hebard27 Sep 2004, 02:003745w17738
Re: Lunars on Sep 20th. (was Re: Perpendicularity check)Frank Reed27 Sep 2004, 01:074245w17736
Re: Soviet Star Globe (was: no subject)Frank Reed27 Sep 2004, 00:562565w17734
Lunars: series vs. triangle methodsFrank Reed27 Sep 2004, 00:5318245w17732
Time sights for Jim TFrank Reed26 Sep 2004, 23:4712211w17728
(no subject)Alexandre Eremenko26 Sep 2004, 23:356569w17726
Re: Definition of estimated position?Henry Halboth26 Sep 2004, 23:154420w17724
Re: George, is there a Part 4c?Fred Hebard26 Sep 2004, 21:312521w17720
Re: George, is there a Part 4c?Jim Thompson26 Sep 2004, 21:003505w17718
Re: Definition of estimated position?Paul Marcuzzo26 Sep 2004, 20:2636940w17716
Re: About French (in)accuracy.Jan Kalivoda26 Sep 2004, 20:062061w17714
Re: About French (in)accuracy.Zorbec Legras26 Sep 2004, 19:552643w17712
Re: Definition of estimated position?Ken Gebhart26 Sep 2004, 19:575723w17710
Re: Definition of estimated position?Jim Thompson26 Sep 2004, 19:352673w17708
Sun sights by 13 year-oldsJim Thompson26 Sep 2004, 19:353735w17706
Re: Definition of estimated position?Jan Kalivoda26 Sep 2004, 18:143912w17704
Re: About French (in)accuracy. was :Lunars for dummies like meJan Kalivoda26 Sep 2004, 18:002957w17702
Nomads and celestial navDoug26 Sep 2004, 18:102411w17700
Definition of estimated position?Russell Sher26 Sep 2004, 16:455557w17698
About French (in)accuracy. was :Lunars for dummies like meZorbec Legras26 Sep 2004, 16:083775w17694
Re: Lunars on Sep 20th. (was Re: Perpendicularity check)Jan Kalivoda26 Sep 2004, 09:575203w17688
Re: Lunar distances - short clearance methodsFrank Reed26 Sep 2004, 06:193945w17684
Lunars on Sep 20th. (was Re: Perpendicularity check)Frank Reed26 Sep 2004, 03:4011271w17680
Re: Maskelyne and his "able computers"Frank Reed26 Sep 2004, 02:512526w17678
Re: George, is there a Part 4c?Frank Reed26 Sep 2004, 02:462975w17676
Re: Lunars for dummies like meFrank Reed26 Sep 2004, 02:384765w17674
Re: Whaling museums, was: on finding Pitcairn IslandFrank Reed26 Sep 2004, 02:305046w17672
Whaling museums, was: on finding Pitcairn IslandTrevor Kenchington25 Sep 2004, 17:073004w17670
Re: Beginner moonrise and set questionGeorge Huxtable25 Sep 2004, 23:215527w17666
Re: Lunars for dummies like meJan Kalivoda25 Sep 2004, 13:283144w17664
Re: George, is there a Part 4c?Arthur Pearson25 Sep 2004, 13:205998w17662
Re: Mutineers on PitcairnArthur Pearson25 Sep 2004, 12:593710w17660
Re: on finding Pitcairn IslandFrank Reed25 Sep 2004, 12:476539w17658
Re: Maskelyne and his "able computers"George Huxtable25 Sep 2004, 10:312992w17656
Re: Perpendicularity checkFred Hebard25 Sep 2004, 03:495634w17650
Re: Lunars for dummies like meFrank Reed25 Sep 2004, 03:206967w17644
Re: Maskelyne and his "able computers"Frank Reed25 Sep 2004, 02:223557w17642
Re: Beginner moonrise and set questionFrank Reed25 Sep 2004, 01:544469w17640
Re: Perpendicularity checkFrank Reed25 Sep 2004, 01:423259w17638
Re: Perpendicularity checkFrank Reed25 Sep 2004, 01:357457w17636
Re: I need your help Dan HoganDan Hogan25 Sep 2004, 00:543118w17634
Mutineers on PitcairnDoug Royer25 Sep 2004, 00:082764w17632
Metcalf e-mail adressDjamel Ait Amrane24 Sep 2004, 22:591962w17628
Re: on finding Pitcairn IslandArthur Pearson24 Sep 2004, 23:054178w17626
Re: George, is there a Part 4c?George Huxtable24 Sep 2004, 23:154855w17624
Re: Lunars for dummies like meGeorge Huxtable24 Sep 2004, 23:154788w17622
I need your help Dan HoganDoug Royer24 Sep 2004, 22:352579w17620
Re: Tables de FriocourtDerrick Young24 Sep 2004, 19:132341w17618
Re: Tables de FriocourtZorbec Legras24 Sep 2004, 18:022644w17616
Tables de FriocourtMarc Bernstein24 Sep 2004, 15:491866w17614
Re: Lunars for dummies like meZorbec Legras24 Sep 2004, 14:023019w17612
Re: Lunars for dummies like meJan Kalivoda24 Sep 2004, 13:512999w17610
George, is there a Part 4c?Jim Thompson24 Sep 2004, 12:592210w17608
Re: Lunars for dummies like meJim Thompson24 Sep 2004, 11:303244w17606
Re: HurricanesJim Thompson24 Sep 2004, 10:566517w17604
Re: Joel JacobsJoel Jacobs24 Sep 2004, 07:206430w17602
On sinking the slipperPeter Fogg24 Sep 2004, 07:033048w17600
Re: Lunars for dummies like meJan Kalivoda24 Sep 2004, 05:423753w17598
Re: Lunars: Three simultaneous observationsFrank Reed24 Sep 2004, 00:035196w17596
Re: Lunars for dummies like meGeorge Huxtable23 Sep 2004, 23:007135w17594
Re: Perpendicularity checkGeorge Huxtable23 Sep 2004, 23:003536w17592
Joel JacobsDoug Royer23 Sep 2004, 22:342143w17590
Re: Protractor.Alexandre Eremenko23 Sep 2004, 19:334991w17588
Re: Protractor.Jared Sherman23 Sep 2004, 17:207195w17586
Re: Datums...Trevor Kenchington23 Sep 2004, 10:533438w17584
Re: Beginner moonrise and set questionJohn Simmonds23 Sep 2004, 16:054572w17582
Lunars for dummies like meJim Thompson23 Sep 2004, 14:363642w17580
Re: New Hurricane ThreatDave Weilacher23 Sep 2004, 12:573629w17578
Re: New Hurricane ThreatFred Hebard23 Sep 2004, 12:463451w17576
Re: Datums...Zorbec Legras23 Sep 2004, 11:192874w17574
Re: New Hurricane ThreatJoel Jacobs23 Sep 2004, 09:345038w17572
Re: Maskelyne and his "able computers"George Huxtable23 Sep 2004, 09:336136w17570
Datums...Aubrey O´Callaghan23 Sep 2004, 08:186627w17568
Re: Finding your co-ordinates for free (without GPS)Sam Critchley23 Sep 2004, 08:142217w17566
Re: Beginner moonrise and set questionBill B23 Sep 2004, 07:422951w17564
Re: Finding your co-ordinates for free (without GPS)Bill B23 Sep 2004, 06:022594w17562
Re: Perpendicularity checkAlexandre Eremenko23 Sep 2004, 05:404285w17560
HTMLCraig Scott23 Sep 2004, 04:162775w17558
Inverting scope. Was: Perpendicularity checkAlexandre Eremenko23 Sep 2004, 04:163728w17556
Re: Perpendicularity checkFred Hebard23 Sep 2004, 04:116599w17554
Re: Perpendicularity checkFrank Reed23 Sep 2004, 04:015415w17552
Re: Protractor.Alexandre Eremenko23 Sep 2004, 03:552967w17550
Re: Perpendicularity checkFrank Reed23 Sep 2004, 03:226077w17548
Re: Beginner moonrise and set questionJohn Simmonds23 Sep 2004, 03:154529w17546
Re: Protractor. Was: BRe: Perpendicularity checkTrevor Kenchington23 Sep 2004, 00:083969w17544
Re: Beginner moonrise and set questionTrevor Kenchington22 Sep 2004, 23:554968w17542
Re: Perpendicularity checkFrank Reed23 Sep 2004, 03:085073w17540
Re: Lunars: Three simultaneous observationsFred Hebard23 Sep 2004, 03:012181w17538
Re: on finding Pitcairn IslandFrank Reed23 Sep 2004, 02:543426w17536
Re: Finding your co-ordinates for free (without GPS)Fred Hebard23 Sep 2004, 02:502380w17534
Re: Lunars: Three simultaneous observationsFrank Reed23 Sep 2004, 02:477507w17532
Re: Finding your co-ordinates for free (without GPS)Craig Scott23 Sep 2004, 02:352820w17530
Re: Maskelyne and his "able computers"Frank Reed23 Sep 2004, 02:314797w17528
Re: Mers el KebirAlexandre Eremenko23 Sep 2004, 02:102828w17526
Re: Perpendicularity checkFred Hebard23 Sep 2004, 02:104249w17524
Finding your co-ordinates for free (without GPS)Alexandre Eremenko23 Sep 2004, 01:572344w17522
Protractor. Was: BRe: Perpendicularity checkAlexandre Eremenko23 Sep 2004, 01:484276w17520
Beginner moonrise and set questionBill B23 Sep 2004, 00:474596w17518
Re: Perpendicularity checkAlexandre Eremenko23 Sep 2004, 00:143729w17516
Re: Perpendicularity checkRobert Gainer22 Sep 2004, 22:262725w17514
Re: Mers el KebirJoel Jacobs22 Sep 2004, 20:5587442w17512
Re: Perpendicularity checkFred Hebard22 Sep 2004, 18:028692w17510
Perpendicularity checkAlexandre Eremenko22 Sep 2004, 16:137392w17508
Re: Mers el KebirDave Weilacher22 Sep 2004, 13:183006w17506
Re: Mers el KebirJim Thompson22 Sep 2004, 12:572754w17504
Re: Mers el KebirJan Kalivoda22 Sep 2004, 11:243316w17502
Nautical Almanac FormatChuck Taylor22 Sep 2004, 03:032092w17500
Re: parallax of the sunHenry Halboth22 Sep 2004, 02:412873w17498
Re: Lunars: Three simultaneous observationsGeorge Huxtable21 Sep 2004, 22:505804w17496
Re: on finding Pitcairn IslandGeorge Huxtable21 Sep 2004, 22:522600w17494
Re: Maskelyne and his "able computers"George Huxtable21 Sep 2004, 22:503633w17492
Re: on finding Pitcairn IslandRobert Gainer21 Sep 2004, 18:434568w17490
Re: on finding Pitcairn IslandTrevor Kenchington21 Sep 2004, 11:453884w17488
Re: parallax of the sunGeorge Huxtable21 Sep 2004, 17:053261w17486
Re: Maskelyne and his "able computers"Fred Hebard21 Sep 2004, 15:533457w17484
Lunars: Three simultaneous observationsFrank Reed21 Sep 2004, 04:518807w17482
Maskelyne and his "able computers"Frank Reed21 Sep 2004, 04:255088w17480
Re: ChauvenetFrank Reed21 Sep 2004, 04:075198w17478
Re: on finding Pitcairn IslandPeter Fogg21 Sep 2004, 04:063202w17476
Re: on finding Pitcairn IslandFrank Reed21 Sep 2004, 03:466337w17474
Re: Lunar distances - shot clearance methodsFrank Reed21 Sep 2004, 03:064549w17472
Re: parallax of the sunFrank Reed21 Sep 2004, 01:463901w17470
Parallax of the sunFred Hebard21 Sep 2004, 00:072195w17468
Re: Mers el KebirRobert Gainer20 Sep 2004, 19:082110w17466
Re: Mers el KebirJared Sherman20 Sep 2004, 18:103249w17464
WWII German Plath gyrosextantFederico Rossi20 Sep 2004, 08:084141w17462
Re: Mers el KebirJan Kalivoda20 Sep 2004, 07:523263w17460
Re: Mers el KebirDan Allen20 Sep 2004, 00:392427w17458
Re: Mers el KebirHenry Halboth19 Sep 2004, 19:272293w17456
Re: Mers el KebirAlexandre Eremenko19 Sep 2004, 05:172361w17454
Re: Mers el KebirAlexandre Eremenko19 Sep 2004, 05:052595w17452
Re: Mers el KebirCraig Scott19 Sep 2004, 04:482792w17450
Re: Mers el KebirJared Sherman18 Sep 2004, 22:042763w17448
Re: Mers el KebirFred Hebard18 Sep 2004, 21:372373w17446
Mers el KebirGeorge Huxtable18 Sep 2004, 21:354988w17444
Re: Royal Navy HistoryZorbec Legras18 Sep 2004, 17:462843w17442
Royal Navy HistoryFred Hebard18 Sep 2004, 16:391872w17440
Re: Pitcairn Island PositionGordon Talge18 Sep 2004, 03:363335w17438
Re: Pitcairn Island PositionDan Allen18 Sep 2004, 00:432344w17436
Pitcairn Island PositionGordon Talge18 Sep 2004, 00:343402w17434
On finding PitcairnDoug Royer18 Sep 2004, 00:312743w17432
Re: ChauvenetAlexandre Eremenko17 Sep 2004, 21:282390w17430
Re: on finding Pitcairn IslandMarc Bernstein17 Sep 2004, 18:232170w17428
Re: on finding Pitcairn IslandAlexandre Eremenko17 Sep 2004, 16:152273w17426
Re: on finding Pitcairn IslandHenry Halboth17 Sep 2004, 15:485332w17424
Re: ChauvenetAlexandre Eremenko17 Sep 2004, 15:072493w17422
(no subject)Alexandre Eremenko17 Sep 2004, 15:004066w17420
Re: ChauvenetFred Hebard17 Sep 2004, 14:541976w17418
Re: ChauvenetFred Hebard17 Sep 2004, 14:484952w17416
Re: on finding Pitcairn IslandTrevor Kenchington16 Sep 2004, 23:292822w17414
Re: ChauvenetAlexandre Eremenko17 Sep 2004, 14:143861w17412
Re: on finding Pitcairn IslandWilliam Sellar17 Sep 2004, 13:462351w17410
Re: ChauvenetGeorge Huxtable17 Sep 2004, 08:353350w17408
Re: on finding Pitcairn IslandFred Hebard17 Sep 2004, 02:422066w17406
Re: on finding Pitcairn IslandBill B17 Sep 2004, 02:222798w17404
Re: on finding Pitcairn IslandGeorge Huxtable17 Sep 2004, 00:114743w17402
Re: on finding Pitcairn IslandGeorge Huxtable17 Sep 2004, 00:116909w17400
Re: Chauvenet, Moon motionAlexandre Eremenko16 Sep 2004, 23:453787w17398
Re: ChauvenetAlexandre Eremenko16 Sep 2004, 21:253904w17396
Re: ChauvenetDan Allen16 Sep 2004, 20:422483w17394
Re: Jules Verne. was: on finding Pitcairn IslandZorbec Legras16 Sep 2004, 20:203304w17392
ChauvenetGeorge Huxtable16 Sep 2004, 20:205868w17390
Re: on finding Pitcairn IslandAlexandre Eremenko16 Sep 2004, 20:022420w17388
Re: on finding Pitcairn IslandPeter Fogg16 Sep 2004, 19:4614143w17386
Re: on finding Pitcairn IslandJared Sherman16 Sep 2004, 19:122147w17384
Re: on finding Pitcairn IslandAlexandre Eremenko16 Sep 2004, 16:034115w17382
Re: on finding Pitcairn IslandZorbec Legras16 Sep 2004, 07:433407w17380
On finding Pitcairn IslandPeter Fogg16 Sep 2004, 05:0913183w17378
Re: Digitized history of navigation resourcesGordon Talge14 Sep 2004, 23:084589w17376
Digitized history of navigation resourcesFrank Reed14 Sep 2004, 21:165731w17374
Re: Lunar distances - shot clearance methodsFrank Reed14 Sep 2004, 20:527126w17372
Job at the National Maritime Museum, Greenwich.George Huxtable14 Sep 2004, 09:183277w17370
Re: Cotter - copy locatedChuck Taylor13 Sep 2004, 16:312073w17368
Re: Selection of stars in HO249Robert Gainer13 Sep 2004, 13:364651w17366
Selection of stars in HO249Geoffrey Butt13 Sep 2004, 11:374195w17364
Re: Gordon on SumnerRobert Gainer12 Sep 2004, 20:302993w17362
Gordon on SumnerJim Thompson12 Sep 2004, 20:132428w17360
Re: Cotter - copy locatedJared Sherman12 Sep 2004, 14:232430w17358
Re: Lunars, etc.: paper by Mendoza Rios, 1796.Jan Kalivoda12 Sep 2004, 12:092750w17356
Re: Lunar distances - shot clearance methodsGeorge Huxtable12 Sep 2004, 11:1911029w17354
Re: Cotter - copy locatedGeorge Huxtable12 Sep 2004, 11:194568w17352
Re: ChauvenetDan Allen12 Sep 2004, 02:464764w17350
Re: ChauvenetCourtney Thomas12 Sep 2004, 01:062411w17348
Lunars, etc.: paper by Mendoza Rios, 1796.Frank Reed11 Sep 2004, 23:272344w17346
ChauvenetMarc Bernstein11 Sep 2004, 23:174014w17344
Re: Cotter - copy locatedFrank Reed11 Sep 2004, 22:256902w17342
Re: Cotter - copy locatedGeorge Huxtable11 Sep 2004, 22:304071w17340
Cotter and other texts: was; Cotter - copy locatedGeorge Huxtable11 Sep 2004, 20:046245w17338
Lunar distances - shot clearance methodsHenry Halboth11 Sep 2004, 17:505379w17336
Re: Cotter - copy locatedGeoffrey Butt11 Sep 2004, 02:301985w17334
Re: Cotter - copy locatedGordon Talge11 Sep 2004, 01:374474w17332
Re: Cotter - copy locatedCourtney Thomas10 Sep 2004, 23:125571w17330
Re: Cotter - copy locatedGeorge Huxtable10 Sep 2004, 21:164967w17328
Re: Cotter - copy locatedCourtney Thomas10 Sep 2004, 14:162390w17326
Cotter - copy locatedGeoffrey Butt10 Sep 2004, 11:292290w17324
NocturnalGennaro Sammarco9 Sep 2004, 17:291808w17322
Re: Beginner Meridian Passage QuestionMichael Dorl9 Sep 2004, 13:394377w17320
Re: Beginner Meridian Passage QuestionAndrés Ruiz9 Sep 2004, 10:093177w17318
Re: Lunar distances - short clearance methodsJan Kalivoda6 Sep 2004, 10:032633w17316
Re: Lunar distances - short clearance methodsFrank Reed6 Sep 2004, 04:233854w17314
Re: Lunar distances - short clearance methodsFrank Reed6 Sep 2004, 04:185919w17312
Re: Lunar distances - short clearance methodsFrank Reed6 Sep 2004, 04:056981w17310
Re: Lunar distances - short clearance methodsFrank Reed6 Sep 2004, 03:4610197w17308
Buy a Little Piece of Bowditch?Frank Reed5 Sep 2004, 23:002406w17306
Re: Lunar distances - short clearance methodsJan Kalivoda5 Sep 2004, 21:514745w17304
Gone till Oct. 6thBruce Stark5 Sep 2004, 21:122524w17302
Re: Lunar distances - short clearance methodsHenry Halboth5 Sep 2004, 04:5817081w17300
Re: Lunar distances - short clearance methodsGeorge Huxtable4 Sep 2004, 23:3513996w17298
Lunar distances - short clearance methodsHenry Halboth4 Sep 2004, 02:07744350w17296
Re: Beginner Meridian Passage QuestionZorbec Legras3 Sep 2004, 16:313813w17294
Re: Beginner Meridian Passage QuestionBill Noyce3 Sep 2004, 13:133170w17292
Re: Beginner Meridian Passage QuestionBill B3 Sep 2004, 01:365647w17290
Re: Beginner Meridian Passage Question CorrectionBill B3 Sep 2004, 01:442186w17288
Re: Beginner Meridian Passage QuestionJim Thompson2 Sep 2004, 12:213642w17286
Re: Beginner Meridian Passage QuestionZorbec Legras2 Sep 2004, 08:584256w17284
Re: Beginner Meridian Passage QuestionBill B1 Sep 2004, 21:274099w17282
Re: Beginner Meridian Passage QuestionBill Noyce1 Sep 2004, 20:275026w17280
Beginner Meridian Passage QuestionBill B1 Sep 2004, 19:514758w17278
Re: Lubricants and corrosion inhibitors (Was: Cleaning andprotecting my Freiberger)Jared Sherman1 Sep 2004, 16:262705w17276
Re: Cleaning and protecting my FreibergerKen Gebhart1 Sep 2004, 16:203642w17274
Re: Lubricants and corrosion inhibitors (Was: Cleaning andprotecting my Freiberger)Renee Mattie1 Sep 2004, 10:442405w17272
Re: Cleaning and protecting my FreibergerRenee Mattie1 Sep 2004, 00:373180w17270
Re: Cleaning and protecting my FreibergerJared Sherman30 Aug 2004, 21:502523w17268
Re: Cleaning and protecting my FreibergerCourtney Thomas30 Aug 2004, 22:334075w17266
Re: Cleaning and protecting my FreibergerKen Gebhart30 Aug 2004, 20:544977w17264
Re: Cleaning and protecting my FreibergerJared Sherman30 Aug 2004, 20:014038w17262
Cleaning and protecting my FreibergerRenee Mattie30 Aug 2004, 18:194194w17260
BaroghraphFederico Rossi27 Aug 2004, 09:243252w17258
Re: Proportional logs, etc.Henry Halboth27 Aug 2004, 04:033201w17256
Re: Proportional logs, etc.Bruce Stark26 Aug 2004, 23:393290w17254
Re: Proportional logs, etc.Frank Reed26 Aug 2004, 23:354842w17252
Re: Proportional logs, etc.Henry Halboth26 Aug 2004, 19:014229w17250
Re: Proportional logs, etc.Jan Kalivoda25 Aug 2004, 22:053296w17248
Re: Proportional logs, etc.Jan Kalivoda25 Aug 2004, 21:473460w17246
Re:       Proportional logs, etc.Bruce Stark25 Aug 2004, 20:443227w17244
Re: Proportional logs, etc.Henry Halboth25 Aug 2004, 19:437646w17242
Re: Proportional logs, etc.Jan Kalivoda25 Aug 2004, 17:455664w17240
Proportional logs, etc.Henry Halboth25 Aug 2004, 14:483514w17238
Re: Proportional logarithmsHenry Halboth25 Aug 2004, 14:382346w17236
Proportional logarithmsHenry Halboth25 Aug 2004, 13:532112w17234
Re: pilot chartsCliff Sojourner25 Aug 2004, 12:192367w17232
Pilot chartsKen James25 Aug 2004, 08:242339w17230
Re: Nav-L Web Page MOVEDDan Hogan24 Aug 2004, 19:162474w17228
Re: Nav-L Web Page MOVEDFred Hebard24 Aug 2004, 14:212366w17226
Re: 1750-1850 cilimatological database world's oceansFred Hebard24 Aug 2004, 04:235679w17224
Nav-L Web Page MOVEDDan Hogan24 Aug 2004, 13:513586w17222
Re: 1750-1850 cilimatological database world's oceansTrevor Kenchington23 Aug 2004, 21:444378w17220
Pics of Antarctic explorer fakedPeter Fogg23 Aug 2004, 22:433122w17218
1750-1850 cilimatological database world's oceansJim Thompson23 Aug 2004, 22:172641w17216
"Floating meridian" practice of navigationJim Thompson23 Aug 2004, 22:172338w17214
TestMichael Dorl23 Aug 2004, 21:352346w17212
Re: SunriseJim Thompson19 Aug 2004, 20:272174w17210
Re: SunriseGeorge Huxtable18 Aug 2004, 23:382574w17208
Guus Dekker....math to calculate LMT of eventsDoug Royer18 Aug 2004, 17:592215w17206
Re: Sextant Scope Parallelism (was Re : SNO-T Sextant)Robert Gainer16 Aug 2004, 17:313205w17204
Re: Nav-L Web Page & FilesJohn Simmonds16 Aug 2004, 10:473838w17202
Re: Sextant Scope Parallelism (was Re : SNO-T Sextant)Ken Gebhart16 Aug 2004, 03:003935w17200
Re: Navigation-L Web Page & FilesRenee Mattie15 Aug 2004, 13:276820w17198
Re: SunriseZorbec Legras15 Aug 2004, 17:232577w17196
Nav-L Web Page & FilesDan Hogan15 Aug 2004, 13:442854w17194
Re: Lunars & Bowditch's First MethodBruce Stark15 Aug 2004, 00:345541w17192
Re: Sextant Scope Parallelism (was Re: SNO-T Sextant)Bruce Stark15 Aug 2004, 00:172823w17190
Re: Sextant Scope Parallelism (was Re : SNO-T Sextant)Bruce Stark15 Aug 2004, 00:144444w17188
Navigation-L Web Page & FilesDan Hogan14 Aug 2004, 21:424089w17186
Re: SunrisePierre Boucher13 Aug 2004, 21:393381w17184
Re: SunriseGeorge Huxtable13 Aug 2004, 20:073185w17182
Re: Sextant Scope Parallelism (was Re : SNO-T Sextant)Robert Gainer13 Aug 2004, 14:436246w17180
SunriseGuus Dekker13 Aug 2004, 07:055462w17178
Re: Lunars & Bowditch's First MethodFrank Reed13 Aug 2004, 03:494050w17176
Re: Sextant Scope Parallelism (was Re: SNO-T Sextant)Frank Reed13 Aug 2004, 03:392555w17174
Re: Sextant Scope Parallelism (was Re : SNO-T Sextant)Frank Reed13 Aug 2004, 03:317167w17172
Re: Sextant Scope Parallelism (was Re : SNO-T Sextant)Robert Gainer13 Aug 2004, 00:593336w17170
Re:       Re: Sextant Scope Parallelism (was Re : SNO-T Sextant)Bruce Stark13 Aug 2004, 00:342982w17168
Re:       Re: Lunars & Bowditch's First MethodBruce Stark13 Aug 2004, 00:214734w17166
Re: Sextant Scope Parallelism (was Re : SNO-T Sextant)Robert Gainer13 Aug 2004, 00:162928w17164
Re:       Re: Sextant Scope Parallelism (was Re : SNO-T Sextant)Bruce Stark13 Aug 2004, 00:022911w17162
Re: Lunars & Bowditch's First MethodFrank Reed12 Aug 2004, 22:275444w17160
Re: Sextant Scope Parallelism (was Re : SNO-T Sextant)Frank Reed12 Aug 2004, 21:586613w17158
Re: Reducing back sightsGeorge Huxtable12 Aug 2004, 21:264407w17156
Re: Knot QuestionRobert Gainer12 Aug 2004, 20:362721w17154
Re:       Re: Lunars & Bowditch's† First MethodBruce Stark12 Aug 2004, 18:463572w17152
Re: Knot QuestionBrooke Clarke12 Aug 2004, 18:363146w17150
Re: Knot QuestionPeter Smith12 Aug 2004, 18:163444w17148
Re: Knot QuestionFuller D Michael12 Aug 2004, 18:113655w17146
Re:       Sextant Scope Parallelism † † †  (was Re: SNO-T Sextant)Bruce Stark12 Aug 2004, 18:063960w17144
Re: Knot QuestionRenee Mattie12 Aug 2004, 17:382823w17142
Re: Knot QuestionFuller D Michael12 Aug 2004, 17:333033w17140
Re: Knot QuestionBill Noyce12 Aug 2004, 17:353080w17138
Knot QuestionBrooke Clarke12 Aug 2004, 17:122330w17136
Re: Reducing back sightsDave Weilacher12 Aug 2004, 12:486709w17134
Re: SNO-T SextantCourtney Thomas12 Aug 2004, 13:442238w17130
Re: Lunars & Bowditch's  First MethodFrank Reed12 Aug 2004, 06:038463w17128
Re: Frank's method of observingFrank Reed12 Aug 2004, 05:325420w17126
Sextant Scope Parallelism       (was Re: SNO-T Sextant)Frank Reed12 Aug 2004, 05:214940w17124
Re:       Re: SNO-T SextantBruce Stark12 Aug 2004, 01:112954w17122
Re: Reducing back sightsGeorge Huxtable11 Aug 2004, 23:085260w17120
Re: Reducing back sightsBill Noyce11 Aug 2004, 21:033463w17118
Re: Reducing back sightsJim Thompson11 Aug 2004, 20:343488w17114
Re: SNO-T SextantCourtney Thomas11 Aug 2004, 21:212068w17112
Re: Reducing back sightsDave Weilacher11 Aug 2004, 19:366145w17110
Re:       Re: SNO-T SextantBruce Stark11 Aug 2004, 19:162502w17108
Re:       Re: SNO-T SextantBruce Stark11 Aug 2004, 19:122200w17106
Re: Reducing back sightsGeorge Huxtable11 Aug 2004, 19:174843w17104
Re: SNO-T SextantCourtney Thomas11 Aug 2004, 19:412928w17102
Re:       Re: SNO-T SextantBruce Stark11 Aug 2004, 16:574093w17100
Re: Reducing back sightsBill Noyce11 Aug 2004, 15:112536w17098
Re: Reducing back sightsBill Noyce11 Aug 2004, 14:413420w17096
Re: Reducing back sightsGeorge Huxtable11 Aug 2004, 13:475485w17094
Re: SNO-T SextantCourtney Thomas11 Aug 2004, 14:433422w17092
Re: SNO-T SextantJoel Jacobs11 Aug 2004, 12:107902w17090
Re: Reducing back sightsHenry Halboth10 Aug 2004, 18:442509w17088
Re:       Re: SNO-T SextantBruce Stark10 Aug 2004, 18:274535w17086
Re: SNO-T SextantCourtney Thomas10 Aug 2004, 18:483033w17084
Frank's method of observingBruce Stark10 Aug 2004, 17:253581w17082
Re: Reducing back sightsDave Weilacher10 Aug 2004, 16:353319w17080
SNO-T SextantBruce Stark10 Aug 2004, 16:333978w17078
Reducing back sightsJim Thompson10 Aug 2004, 10:502364w17076
Re:       Re: Lunars & Bowditch's  First MethodBruce Stark9 Aug 2004, 00:305557w17074
Re: New South Wales Vs North CarolinaCourtney Thomas8 Aug 2004, 20:244159w17072
Re: New South Wales Vs North CarolinaJoel Jacobs8 Aug 2004, 15:073785w17070
Re: SNO-T Manual, Heath Brochure CLEANING SEXTANTSGlendon8 Aug 2004, 12:063199w17068
Re: Cleaning SextantsPeter Fogg8 Aug 2004, 02:457315w17066
Re: Mendoza's lunars, and Merrifield's.Frank Reed8 Aug 2004, 02:287796w17064
Re: Lunars aboard a Schooner -- 1823Craig Scott7 Aug 2004, 22:292188w17062
Mendoza's lunars, and Merrifield's.George Huxtable7 Aug 2004, 21:444257w17060
Lunars aboard a Schooner -- 1823Frank Reed7 Aug 2004, 18:4527074w17058
Re: Lunars & Bowditch's First MethodFrank Reed7 Aug 2004, 18:265084w17056
Re:       Re: Mendoza's method for clearing lunars.Bruce Stark7 Aug 2004, 18:143564w17054
Re: Mendoza's method for clearing lunars.Frank Reed7 Aug 2004, 18:054416w17052
Rogue wavesJim Thompson7 Aug 2004, 16:572101w17050
Re: Mendoza's method for clearing lunars.George Huxtable7 Aug 2004, 14:282603w17048
Re: Derek Howse's book "Nevil Maskelyne, the seaman's astronomer"George Huxtable7 Aug 2004, 14:272568w17046
Re: SNO-T Manual, Heath Brochure CLEANING SEXTANTSJoel Jacobs7 Aug 2004, 12:444123w17044
Re: Why epoxy cement for emergency navigation?Keith Williams7 Aug 2004, 11:463025w17042
Why epoxy cement for emergency navigation?Jim Thompson7 Aug 2004, 10:082239w17040
Re: SNO-T Manual, Heath Brochure CLEANING SEXTANTSGlendon7 Aug 2004, 03:103283w17038
Re: Derek Howse's book "Nevil Maskelyne, the seaman's astronomer"Robert Gainer6 Aug 2004, 23:252329w17036
Re:       Lunars & Bowditch's First MethodBruce Stark6 Aug 2004, 22:443954w17034
Re: Derek Howse's book "Nevil Maskelyne, the seaman's astronomer"George Huxtable6 Aug 2004, 22:455196w17032
Re: Derek Howse's book "Nevil Maskelyne, the seaman's astronomer"Robert Gainer6 Aug 2004, 20:235098w17030
Derek Howse's book "Nevil Maskelyne, the seaman's astronomer"George Huxtable6 Aug 2004, 19:104034w17028
Re: SNO-T Manual, Heath Brochure CLEANING SEXTANTSJoel Jacobs6 Aug 2004, 12:159195w17026
SNO-T Manual, Heath BrochureGlendon6 Aug 2004, 02:463536w17024
Re: Sunrise, Sunset, LAN, LMTGlendon6 Aug 2004, 02:462390w17022
Re: Sunrise, Sunset, LAN, LMTDan Allen6 Aug 2004, 01:452151w17020
Sunrise,Sunset,LAN,LMTDoug Royer6 Aug 2004, 01:483253w17018
Lunars & Bowditch's First MethodFrank Reed6 Aug 2004, 01:203119w17016
Lunars & Don Jose de Mendoza y RiosFrank Reed6 Aug 2004, 01:125797w17014
Re: Sunrise, Sunset, LAN, LMTFrank Reed6 Aug 2004, 00:464221w17012
Re: Sunrise, Sunset, LAN, LMTHenry Halboth5 Aug 2004, 23:514769w17010
Re: Maintenance of SNO-T's Was Re: on washing sextantsRobert Gainer5 Aug 2004, 23:494861w17008
Re: SNO-T manual Was Re: Maintenance of SNO-T'sRenee Mattie5 Aug 2004, 18:262262w17006
Re: Maintenance of SNO-T's Was Re: on washing sextantsJoel Jacobs5 Aug 2004, 23:113901w17004
Re: French SextantJared Sherman5 Aug 2004, 19:293421w17002
Re: Maintenance of SNO-T's Was Re: on washing sextantsRobert Gainer5 Aug 2004, 15:053474w17000
Re: Maintenance of SNO-T's Was Re: on washing sextantsCourtney Thomas5 Aug 2004, 13:243635w16998
Re: French SextantJim Thompson5 Aug 2004, 11:213981w16996
Re: Clarification of Question regarding LANJim Thompson5 Aug 2004, 11:072409w16994
Re: Maintenance of SNO-T's Was Re: on washing sextantsJoel Jacobs5 Aug 2004, 05:553941w16992
Re: French SextantJoel Jacobs5 Aug 2004, 05:453534w16990
A Lunar from 1825Frank Reed5 Aug 2004, 05:244871w16988
Re: Sunrise, Sunset, LAN, LMTChuck Taylor5 Aug 2004, 04:173439w16986
Re: Clarification of Question regarding LANChuck Taylor5 Aug 2004, 04:092458w16984
Re: Clarification of Question regarding LANChuck Taylor5 Aug 2004, 04:046511w16982
SNO-T sextants manuel - big PDF fileGerard Mittelstaedt5 Aug 2004, 03:233815w16980
Re: Clarification of Question regarding LANPierre Boucher5 Aug 2004, 02:392166w16978
Re: French SextantJared Sherman5 Aug 2004, 02:142803w16976
Re: Maintenance of SNO-T's Was Re: on washing sextantsGlendon5 Aug 2004, 01:413441w16974
French SextantDoug Royer4 Aug 2004, 23:302129w16972
Re: Sunrise, Sunset, LAN, LMTGeorge Huxtable4 Aug 2004, 23:087048w16970
Re: Clarification of Question regarding LANJoel Jacobs4 Aug 2004, 22:025779w16968
Re: Clarification of Question regarding LANJim Thompson4 Aug 2004, 21:144796w16966
Re: Clarification of Question regarding LANJoel Jacobs4 Aug 2004, 21:103097w16964
Re: Clarification of Question regarding LANRobert Gainer4 Aug 2004, 20:052778w16962
Re: Clarification of Question regarding LANZorbec Legras4 Aug 2004, 17:122956w16960
Re: Mendoza's method for clearing lunars.Frank Reed4 Aug 2004, 17:514745w16958
Re: Mendoza's method for clearing lunars.George Huxtable4 Aug 2004, 17:184263w16956
Paper Calc. NoonDoug Royer4 Aug 2004, 17:163377w16954
Re: Sunrise, Sunset, LAN, LMTBill Noyce4 Aug 2004, 15:4912382w16952
Re: Sunrise, Sunset, LAN, LMTHenry Halboth4 Aug 2004, 15:504521w16950
Re: Clarification of Question regarding LANChuck Taylor4 Aug 2004, 15:363551w16948
Clarification of Question regarding LANAndrew Corl4 Aug 2004, 15:003882w16946
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberBob Batten4 Aug 2004, 14:343103w16944
Re: Mendoza's method for clearing lunars.George Huxtable4 Aug 2004, 11:167356w16942
Re: Maintenance of SNO-T's Was Re: on washing sextantsJoel Jacobs4 Aug 2004, 06:406758w16940
Re: Sunrise, Sunset, LAN, LMTMike Boersma4 Aug 2004, 04:214249w16938
Re: on washing sextantsJim Thompson4 Aug 2004, 01:492644w16936
Re: Maintenance of SNO-T's Was Re: on washing sextantsCourtney Thomas4 Aug 2004, 03:005528w16934
Maintenance of SNO-T's Was Re: on washing sextantsGlendon4 Aug 2004, 00:455102w16932
Re: Mendoza's method for clearing lunars.Frank Reed4 Aug 2004, 00:458083w16930
Re: on washing sextantsPeter Fogg3 Aug 2004, 22:473223w16928
Re: Sunrise, Sunset, LAN, LMTDan Allen4 Aug 2004, 00:3011644w16926
Sunrise, Sunset, LAN, LMTAndrew Corl3 Aug 2004, 19:167726w16924
Re: Mendoza's method for clearing lunars.Paul Hirose3 Aug 2004, 19:043057w16922
Re: on washing sextantsJared Sherman3 Aug 2004, 17:373749w16920
Re: on washing sextantsJoel Jacobs3 Aug 2004, 16:565913w16918
Re: Something Of InterestHenry Halboth3 Aug 2004, 15:115740w16916
Re: Lower branch transits of moon?Peter Smith3 Aug 2004, 14:503706w16914
Re: on washing sextantsCourtney Thomas3 Aug 2004, 14:524498w16912
Re: on washing sextantsJoel Jacobs3 Aug 2004, 12:244079w16910
Re: Mendoza's method for clearing lunars.George Huxtable3 Aug 2004, 09:443543w16908
Re: Mendoza's method for clearing lunars.Henry Halboth3 Aug 2004, 03:253707w16906
On washing sextantsPeter Fogg3 Aug 2004, 02:452790w16904
Re: Mendoza's method for clearing lunars.Herbert Prinz3 Aug 2004, 02:312447w16902
Re: Sextant lubrication and protectionJoel Jacobs3 Aug 2004, 00:335146w16900
Re: Mendoza's method for clearing lunars.Herbert Prinz2 Aug 2004, 23:483176212w16898
Re: Mendoza's method for clearing lunars.Herbert Prinz2 Aug 2004, 23:542109w16896
7/8 Scale Sextants FinaleJoel Jacobs2 Aug 2004, 23:375888w16894
Sextant lubrication and protectionDoug Royer2 Aug 2004, 23:004105w16892
Re: Mendoza's method for clearing lunars.Frank Reed2 Aug 2004, 22:446687w16890
Re: Scaling and stability: Was [Nav-L] 7/8 SCALE SEXTANTS MOREJoel Jacobs2 Aug 2004, 22:414836w16888
Re: Mendoza's method for clearing lunars.George Huxtable2 Aug 2004, 22:152497w16886
Scaling and stability: Was [Nav-L] 7/8 SCALE SEXTANTS MOREGeorge Huxtable2 Aug 2004, 22:044247w16884
Re: Mendoza's method for clearing lunars.George Huxtable2 Aug 2004, 22:043272w16882
Re:       Re: † † † Mendoza's method for  clearing lunars.Bruce Stark2 Aug 2004, 21:372693w16880
Re:Re:       Mendoza's method for clearing lunars.Henry Halboth2 Aug 2004, 19:563516w16878
Re: 7/8 Scale SextantsPeter Fogg2 Aug 2004, 19:073959w16876
Re:       Mendoza's method for clearing lunars.Bruce Stark2 Aug 2004, 17:554451w16874
Re: 7/8 Scale Sextants MoreJoel Jacobs2 Aug 2004, 16:0114133w16872
Re: Mendoza's method for clearing lunars.Craig Scott2 Aug 2004, 15:592723w16870
Re: 7/8 Scale Sextants MoreHenry Halboth2 Aug 2004, 15:2512184w16868
Re: Mendoza's method for clearing lunars.Henry Halboth2 Aug 2004, 15:149682w16866
Re: 7/8 Scale Sextants MoreRobert Gainer2 Aug 2004, 14:4811134w16864
Re: 7/8 Scale Sextants MoreJoel Jacobs2 Aug 2004, 13:508622w16862
Re: 7/8 Scale Sextants MoreRobert Gainer2 Aug 2004, 13:217487w16860
Re: Lower branch transits of moon?Zorbec Legras2 Aug 2004, 12:142628w16858
Re: 7/8 Scale Sextants MoreJoel Jacobs2 Aug 2004, 11:536371w16856
7/8 Scale SextantsJoel Jacobs2 Aug 2004, 11:395574w16854
Re: Lower branch transits of moon?Jim Thompson2 Aug 2004, 11:292304w16852
Re: Cyrillic alphabet, was: Soviet Sextants!Joel Jacobs2 Aug 2004, 10:463532w16850
Re: Celestaire vs Freiberger Yacht SextantRobert Gainer2 Aug 2004, 10:143313w16848
Mendoza's method for clearing lunars.George Huxtable2 Aug 2004, 09:408362w16846
Re: Celestaire vs Freiberger Yacht SextantGeorge Huxtable2 Aug 2004, 09:403111w16844
Re: Lower branch transits of moon?Zorbec Legras2 Aug 2004, 06:392829w16842
Re: Celestaire vs Freiberger Yacht SextantJared Sherman2 Aug 2004, 04:322888w16840
Re: Celestaire vs Freiberger Yacht SextantPeter Fogg2 Aug 2004, 04:014228w16838
Cyrillic alphabet, was: Soviet Sextants!Trevor Kenchington31 Jul 2004, 22:353179w16836
Heavy SeasTrevor Kenchington31 Jul 2004, 11:262347w16834
Lower branch transits of moon?Jim Thompson2 Aug 2004, 00:382316w16832
Re: Sextant RepairsRobert Gainer1 Aug 2004, 13:4312899w16830
Re: Sextant RepairsJoel Jacobs1 Aug 2004, 13:2611476w16828
Sextant LanyardJim Thompson1 Aug 2004, 13:012728w16826
Re: Sextant RepairsCourtney Thomas1 Aug 2004, 14:0210207w16824
Re: Celestaire vs Freiberger Yacht SextantJoel Jacobs1 Aug 2004, 11:393142w16822
Re: Sextant RepairsJoel Jacobs1 Aug 2004, 11:329785w16820
Latitude + Longitude @ NoonHenry Halboth1 Aug 2004, 02:566040w16818
Celestaire vs Freiberger Yacht SextantGerad Duffin1 Aug 2004, 01:142245w16816
Re: Soviet Sextants!Robert Gainer31 Jul 2004, 22:528356w16814
Re: Soviet Sextants!Joel Jacobs31 Jul 2004, 20:586303w16812
Re: Soviet Sextants!Renee Mattie30 Jul 2004, 14:593290w16810
Navigation-L Web PageDan Hogan31 Jul 2004, 16:424083w16808
Re: Soviet Sextants!Courtney Thomas31 Jul 2004, 17:195390w16806
Re: Soviet Sextants!Joel Jacobs31 Jul 2004, 15:544983w16804
Re: Soviet Sextants!Renee Mattie30 Jul 2004, 15:573417w16802
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberPaul Hirose31 Jul 2004, 02:232402w16800
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberGeorge Huxtable30 Jul 2004, 23:055857w16798
Lubricants [was] Soviet Sextants!Jared Sherman30 Jul 2004, 22:533950w16796
Re: Soviet Sextants!Dan Hogan30 Jul 2004, 21:471773w16794
Re: Soviet Sextants!Joel Jacobs30 Jul 2004, 19:379078w16792
Re: Soviet Sextants!Robert Gainer30 Jul 2004, 17:546781w16790
Soviet sextants!Mike Burkes30 Jul 2004, 17:273383w16788
Re: Soviet Sextants!Joel Jacobs30 Jul 2004, 15:3821829w16786
Re: Soviet Sextants!Robert Gainer30 Jul 2004, 15:312846w16784
Re: Soviet Sextants!Joel Jacobs30 Jul 2004, 13:2811237w16782
Re: Soviet Sextants!Robert Gainer30 Jul 2004, 13:272922w16780
Re: Soviet Sextants!James Dawkins30 Jul 2004, 13:048729w16778
Re: Soviet Sextants!Joel Jacobs30 Jul 2004, 11:1745647w16776
Re: Soviet Sextants!John Simmonds30 Jul 2004, 09:534788w16774
Re: Soviet Sextants!Federico Rossi30 Jul 2004, 06:166161w16772
Re: Soviet Sextants!Courtney Thomas30 Jul 2004, 03:222723w16770
Re: Soviet Sextants!Glendon30 Jul 2004, 02:017839w16768
Soviet Sextants!Mike Burkes30 Jul 2004, 00:434082w16766
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberFrank Reed29 Jul 2004, 18:174526w16764
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberFrank Reed29 Jul 2004, 18:103057w16762
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberFrank Reed29 Jul 2004, 18:054863w16760
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberFrank Reed29 Jul 2004, 17:573914w16758
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberFrank Reed29 Jul 2004, 17:535364w16756
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberFrank Reed29 Jul 2004, 17:465145w16754
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberFrank Reed29 Jul 2004, 17:373175w16752
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberRichard B. Langley29 Jul 2004, 15:0030431w16750
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberGeoffrey Kolbe29 Jul 2004, 06:253826w16748
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberGeorge Huxtable28 Jul 2004, 21:572673w16746
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberPaul Hirose28 Jul 2004, 17:552708w16744
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberBrooke Clarke28 Jul 2004, 17:344050w16742
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberZorbec Legras28 Jul 2004, 17:152434w16740
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberTim B28 Jul 2004, 15:182339w16738
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberGeoffrey Kolbe28 Jul 2004, 14:592397w16736
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberGeorge Huxtable28 Jul 2004, 14:524442w16734
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberJan Kalivoda28 Jul 2004, 13:012223w16732
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberRichard B. Langley28 Jul 2004, 12:327601w16730
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberRichard Irvine28 Jul 2004, 09:037230w16728
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberCasey McMullen28 Jul 2004, 00:013275w16726
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberGeorge Huxtable27 Jul 2004, 23:285489w16724
Re: WEB Page HOMEDan Hogan27 Jul 2004, 20:153031w16722
Re: Cel Nav!Robert Gainer27 Jul 2004, 17:489363w16720
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberRichard B. Langley27 Jul 2004, 17:195663w16718
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberRichard B. Langley27 Jul 2004, 15:584812w16716
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberAndrés Ruiz27 Jul 2004, 14:2010315w16714
Re: WEB Page HOMEAndrés Ruiz27 Jul 2004, 14:1819817w16712
Re: WEB Page HOMERobert Gainer27 Jul 2004, 13:436708w16710
Re: WEB Page HOMEDan Hogan27 Jul 2004, 12:545030w16708
Re: Cel Nav!George Huxtable27 Jul 2004, 08:525723w16706
Re: no leap second coming in DecemberGeorge Huxtable27 Jul 2004, 08:522832w16704
Re: WEB Page HOMEJoel Jacobs26 Jul 2004, 23:304073w16702
Re: WEB Page HOMERobert Gainer26 Jul 2004, 22:174616w16700
Re: WEB Page HOMEFrank Reed26 Jul 2004, 21:222554w16698
Re: WEB Page HOMEDan Hogan26 Jul 2004, 20:283385w16696
Re: WEB Page HOMERobert Gainer26 Jul 2004, 20:073125w16694
WEB Page HOMEDan Hogan26 Jul 2004, 19:453597w16692
Home for Nav-L WEb Page and FilesDan Hogan26 Jul 2004, 13:163503w16690
Re: Woman clipper ship captainDavid Edwards26 Jul 2004, 13:142040w16688
Re: Woman clipper ship captainDave Weilacher26 Jul 2004, 12:572169w16686
Woman clipper ship captainMarc Bernstein26 Jul 2004, 12:491788w16684
Something Of InterestJoel Jacobs26 Jul 2004, 11:4960626w16682
Re: Refraction, sunset, and HO229 beginner questionHenry Halboth25 Jul 2004, 19:303635w16680
No leap second coming in DecemberPaul Hirose24 Jul 2004, 21:422069w16678
Re: Level of observation accuracyFrank Reed24 Jul 2004, 20:295089w16676
Re: Level of observation accuracyDan Allen24 Jul 2004, 19:586616w16674
Re: ReRe: Level of observation accuracyFrank Reed24 Jul 2004, 19:293773w16672
Re: Superman --How far off topic ya wanna go?Frank Reed24 Jul 2004, 19:243466w16670
Silicon Sea 32!!Mike Burkes24 Jul 2004, 15:413503w16668
Re: Superman --How far off topic ya wanna go?Bill B24 Jul 2004, 01:542566w16666
Re: Level of observation accuracy in medium seasRobert Gainer24 Jul 2004, 01:133244w16664
Re: Level of observation accuracy in medium seasJared Sherman23 Jul 2004, 23:052601w16662
Re: Level of observation accuracy in medium seasJared Sherman23 Jul 2004, 23:052626w16660
Re: WavesBill B23 Jul 2004, 22:162651w16658
ReRe: Level of observation accuracyBill B23 Jul 2004, 21:474745w16656
Re: Level of observation accuracy in medium seasJared Sherman23 Jul 2004, 17:027843w16654
Re: Level of observation accuracy in medium seasJared Sherman23 Jul 2004, 16:384113w16652
WavesRobert Gainer23 Jul 2004, 16:314187w16650
Re: Level of observation accuracy in medium seasRobert Gainer23 Jul 2004, 13:577393w16648
Re: Level of observation accuracy in medium seasDave Weilacher23 Jul 2004, 13:135724w16646
Re: Level of observation accuracy in medium seasRobert Gainer23 Jul 2004, 12:444623w16644
Re: Level of observation accuracy in medium seasDave Weilacher23 Jul 2004, 11:423304w16642
Re: Navigation-l Mailing List Archive.1997 gaps!Peter Fogg23 Jul 2004, 05:082859w16640
Re: Level of observation accuracy in medium seasFrank Reed23 Jul 2004, 02:543777w16638
Re: Level of observation accuracy in medium seasJared Sherman23 Jul 2004, 02:343170w16636
Re: Level of observation accuracy in medium seasDave Weilacher23 Jul 2004, 02:073941w16634
Re: Level of observation accuracy in medium seasFrank Reed23 Jul 2004, 01:373496w16632
Re: Level of observation accuracy in medium seasRobert Gainer22 Jul 2004, 22:254437w16630
Re: Level of observation accuracy in medium seasDave Weilacher22 Jul 2004, 21:283643w16628
Level of observation accuracy in medium seasBill B22 Jul 2004, 21:133115w16626
Re: Refraction, sunset, and HO229 beginner questionFrank Reed22 Jul 2004, 19:5310035w16624
Re: Refraction, sunset, and HO229 beginner questionJim Theriot22 Jul 2004, 14:463192w16622
Re: Navigation-l Mailing List Archive.1997 gaps!John Simmonds22 Jul 2004, 10:077770w16620
Re: Longitude on PBSJoel Jacobs21 Jul 2004, 17:034683w16618
Re: Longitude on PBSJohn O´Donnell21 Jul 2004, 15:514272w16616
Re: Longitude on PBSMarc Bernstein21 Jul 2004, 15:503024w16614
Re: Longitude on PBSMarc Bernstein21 Jul 2004, 15:467726w16612
Re: Longitude on PBSJohn O´Donnell21 Jul 2004, 15:025829w16610
Re: Navigation instruments from Paris, MaskelyneJoel Jacobs21 Jul 2004, 11:076815w16608
Re: Navigation instruments from Paris, MaskelynePeter Fogg21 Jul 2004, 04:584966w16606
Re: GPS grids and mapsPeter Fogg21 Jul 2004, 04:455762w16604
Re: Navigation instruments from Paris, MaskelyneBrooke Clarke21 Jul 2004, 04:0215152w16602
Re: Navigation instruments from Paris, MaskelynePeter Fogg21 Jul 2004, 03:356426w16600
Maskelyne: Messenger and MessageFrank Reed21 Jul 2004, 02:395757w16598
GPS grids and mapsMarc Bernstein20 Jul 2004, 23:243809w16596
Longitude on PBSFrank Reed20 Jul 2004, 23:083606w16594
Re: fire & police department navigationJared Sherman20 Jul 2004, 22:504037w16592
Re: fire & police department navigationBrooke Clarke20 Jul 2004, 21:2511630w16590
Re: fire & police department navigationFred Hebard20 Jul 2004, 21:034326w16588
Fire & police department navigationPaul Hirose20 Jul 2004, 20:145255w16586
Re: Navigation instruments from Paris, MaskelyneJoel Jacobs20 Jul 2004, 13:025578w16584
Re: Nevil Maskelyne.Fred Hebard20 Jul 2004, 12:012180w16582
Re: Navigation instruments from Paris, MaskelyneJan Kalivoda20 Jul 2004, 09:031978w16580
Re: Navigation instruments from Paris, MaskelyneJan Kalivoda20 Jul 2004, 08:543791w16578
Re: Navigation instruments from Paris, MaskelyneZorbec Legras20 Jul 2004, 08:432534w16576
Re: Nevil Maskelyne.Frank Reed20 Jul 2004, 03:203038w16574
Re: Nevil Maskelyne.Ken James20 Jul 2004, 03:142776w16572
Re: The Online Nautical AlmanacFrank Reed20 Jul 2004, 03:126435w16570
Re: Nevil Maskelyne.Peter Fogg20 Jul 2004, 01:203468w16568
Re: AtlasesDan Allen20 Jul 2004, 00:124912w16566
Re: Nevil Maskelyne.George Huxtable19 Jul 2004, 23:583942w16564
Re: Nevil Maskelyne.Peter Fogg19 Jul 2004, 22:233715w16562
Re: Navigation instruments from Paris, MaskelyneJoel Jacobs19 Jul 2004, 22:003266w16560
Navigation instruments from Paris, MaskelyneJan Kalivoda19 Jul 2004, 21:392222w16558
Re: Mirages, was: RefractionFred Hebard19 Jul 2004, 20:301972w16556
Re: Nevil Maskelyne.Dan Allen19 Jul 2004, 17:394861w16552
Re: Nevil MaskelyneFred Hebard19 Jul 2004, 13:244059w16550
Nevil Maskelyne.Wolfgang Köberer19 Jul 2004, 12:242422w16546
Re: Nevil Maskelyne.George Huxtable19 Jul 2004, 08:543911w16544
UnsubscribeLloyd S19 Jul 2004, 04:133051w16542
Re: SunriseStacy Hanna19 Jul 2004, 00:063680w16538
SunriseGuus Dekker18 Jul 2004, 18:382544w16534
Re: Cel Nav!Robert Gainer18 Jul 2004, 14:3712155w16532
Re: Navigation-l Mailing List Archive.1997 gaps!Peter Fogg18 Jul 2004, 03:145957w16530
Re: Mirages, was: RefractionTrevor Kenchington17 Jul 2004, 22:015450w16529
Re: Nevil Maskelyne.Fred Hebard17 Jul 2004, 21:273863w16528
Re: Mirages, was: RefractionFred Hebard17 Jul 2004, 21:434033w16526
Re: Nevil Maskelyne.Fred Hebard17 Jul 2004, 21:032451w16524
Re: Nevil Maskelyne - "Credat IudaeusApella"Jan Kalivoda17 Jul 2004, 17:402215w16522
Re: Nevil Maskelyne.Richard B. Langley17 Jul 2004, 17:273114w16520
Cel Nav!Mike Burkes17 Jul 2004, 16:587619w16518
Re: The Online Nautical AlmanacGeorge Huxtable17 Jul 2004, 17:012305w16516
Re: Nevil Maskelyne.George Huxtable17 Jul 2004, 17:0011130w16514
Re: Nevil Maskelyne.Carl Herzog17 Jul 2004, 15:218488w16512
Re: Refraction. was: Bubble Horizon Altitude CorrectionsRichard B. Langley17 Jul 2004, 14:145763w16510
Re: Nevil Maskelyne.Robert Gainer17 Jul 2004, 12:563182w16508
Re: Mirages, was: RefractionKieran Kelly17 Jul 2004, 03:263757w16506
Re: Mirages, was: RefractionTrevor Kenchington16 Jul 2004, 21:195732w16504
Re: Nevil Maskelyne.Trevor Kenchington16 Jul 2004, 20:394639w16502
Re: The Online Nautical AlmanacFrank Reed16 Jul 2004, 22:543241w16500
Re: Refraction. was: Bubble Horizon Altitude CorrectionsDan Allen16 Jul 2004, 22:463239w16498
Re: Nevil Maskelyne.Dan Allen16 Jul 2004, 22:372376w16496
Re: The Evolution of Celestial Navigation.Frank Reed16 Jul 2004, 22:413575w16494
Re: Nevil Maskelyne.Frank Reed16 Jul 2004, 22:3613988w16492
Re: Sextant restoration in UK.George Huxtable15 Jul 2004, 22:292563w16490
Re: The Online Nautical AlmanacGeorge Huxtable15 Jul 2004, 22:2911944w16488
Re: The Evolution of Celestial Navigation.Wolfgang Köberer15 Jul 2004, 14:003243w16486
Re: GMT from Jupiter's moonsPaul Hirose15 Jul 2004, 04:276049w16484
Re: MaskelyneGeoffrey Butt15 Jul 2004, 04:182217w16482
Re: The Evolution of Celestial Navigation.Frank Reed15 Jul 2004, 01:232717w16480
Re: Nevil Maskelyne.George Huxtable14 Jul 2004, 20:176691w16478
Re: GMT from Jupiter's moonsGeorge Huxtable14 Jul 2004, 17:169709w16476
GMT from Jupiter's moonsFred Hebard14 Jul 2004, 03:402121w16474
Re: Nav calculatorCourtney Thomas14 Jul 2004, 01:472354w16472
Re: Nav calculatorKen James14 Jul 2004, 00:032717w16470
Re: Nav calculatorCourtney Thomas14 Jul 2004, 00:592803w16468
Re: Mirages, was: RefractionFred Hebard13 Jul 2004, 23:182556w16466
The Evolution of Celestial Navigation.George Huxtable13 Jul 2004, 22:524441w16464
Nav calculatorKen James13 Jul 2004, 22:413141w16462
Re: Mirages, was: RefractionFrank Reed13 Jul 2004, 22:002742w16460
Re: Nevil Maskelyne.Frank Reed13 Jul 2004, 21:585686w16458
Re: The Online Nautical AlmanacFrank Reed13 Jul 2004, 21:383464w16456
Re: Lunar-distance almanac errors [was; The Online NauticalAlmanac- beware!]Frank Reed13 Jul 2004, 21:343404w16454
Re: Lunar-distance almanac errors.Frank Reed13 Jul 2004, 21:314213w16452
Nevil Maskelyne.George Huxtable13 Jul 2004, 19:183286w16450
The Online Nautical AlmanacGeorge Huxtable13 Jul 2004, 19:183381w16448
Re: Lunar-distance almanac errors [was; The Online NauticalAlmanac- beware!]George Huxtable13 Jul 2004, 09:384558w16446
Re: Lunar-distance almanac errors.George Huxtable13 Jul 2004, 09:383977w16444
Re: Mirages, was: RefractionFred Hebard13 Jul 2004, 03:584146w16442
Mirages, was: RefractionTrevor Kenchington12 Jul 2004, 08:443556w16440
Re: Refraction. was: Bubble Horizon Altitude CorrectionsFred Hebard12 Jul 2004, 04:064858w16438
Re: Refraction. was: Bubble Horizon Altitude CorrectionsTrevor Kenchington9 Jul 2004, 19:584532w16436
Re: Refraction for beginnersBob Batten12 Jul 2004, 01:292364w16434
Re: Refraction for beginnersPaul Hirose11 Jul 2004, 20:363930w16432
Navigation-l Mailing List Archive.1997 gaps!Mike Burkes11 Jul 2004, 20:254024w16430
Re: Refraction for beginnersJared Sherman10 Jul 2004, 01:182426w16428
Re: Refraction for beginnersFrank Reed10 Jul 2004, 01:183768w16426
Re: Refraction for beginnersFrank Reed10 Jul 2004, 00:585681w16424
Re: Refraction for beginnersFrank Reed10 Jul 2004, 00:4711552w16422
Re: Refraction for beginnersBill B9 Jul 2004, 21:542526w16420
Refraction, sunset, and HO229 beginner questionBill B9 Jul 2004, 21:384948w16418
Re: Refraction for beginnersFred Hebard9 Jul 2004, 21:242851w16416
Refraction for beginnersBill B9 Jul 2004, 20:064021w16414
Re: Refraction.Frank Reed9 Jul 2004, 19:164192w16412
Re: Refraction.John Brenneise9 Jul 2004, 18:147782w16410
Re: Lunar calculation (establishing time)Victor Garand9 Jul 2004, 15:043199w16408
Re: Refraction.Frank Reed9 Jul 2004, 08:573985w16406
Re: Lunar calculation (establishing time)Frank Reed9 Jul 2004, 08:503012w16404
Re: Lunar calculation (establishing time)Frank Reed9 Jul 2004, 08:473966w16402
Re: The Online Nautical Almanac- beware!Frank Reed9 Jul 2004, 08:324176w16400
Re: Lunar calculation (establishing time)Bill B9 Jul 2004, 06:272178w16398
The Online Nautical Almanac- beware!George Huxtable8 Jul 2004, 21:202720w16396
Lunar calculation (establishing time)Victor Garand8 Jul 2004, 20:504100w16394
Re: Refraction. was: Bubble Horizon Altitude CorrectionsTrevor Kenchington7 Jul 2004, 20:102747w16392
Re: Refraction.John Brenneise8 Jul 2004, 00:098239w16390
Re: Refraction.George Huxtable7 Jul 2004, 23:356870w16388
Re: Refraction.Frank Reed7 Jul 2004, 22:1110608w16386
Re: Lunar-distance almanac errors [was; The Online NauticalAlmanac- beware!]Frank Reed7 Jul 2004, 21:347532w16384
Re: The Online Nautical Almanac- beware!Frank Reed7 Jul 2004, 20:134228w16382
Re: Refraction. was: Bubble Horizon Altitude CorrectionsRobert Gainer7 Jul 2004, 20:053756w16380
Re: Refraction.John Brenneise7 Jul 2004, 18:223680w16378
Re: Refraction. was: Bubble Horizon Altitude CorrectionsTrevor Kenchington6 Jul 2004, 23:313199w16376
Re: Refraction.Robert Gainer7 Jul 2004, 17:373681w16374
Re: Refraction.Fred Hebard7 Jul 2004, 17:003001w16372
Re: Refraction.George Huxtable7 Jul 2004, 16:452420w16370
Lunar-distance almanac errors [was; The Online Nautical Almanac-beware!]George Huxtable7 Jul 2004, 16:455977w16368
Re: The Online Nautical Almanac- beware!George Huxtable7 Jul 2004, 16:454050w16366
Re: Refraction. was: Bubble Horizon Altitude CorrectionsJohn Brenneise7 Jul 2004, 03:5610845w16364
Re: The Online Nautical Almanac- beware!Frank Reed7 Jul 2004, 02:425626w16362
Re: A NEW Online Nautical AlmanacFrank Reed7 Jul 2004, 02:232841w16360
Re: A NEW Online Nautical AlmanacDoug Royer6 Jul 2004, 16:415315w16358
Fw:USNA Brigade In the News: For the Week of June 28 - July 2,2004Joel Jacobs6 Jul 2004, 16:203622w16356
Refraction. was: Bubble Horizon Altitude CorrectionsGeorge Huxtable6 Jul 2004, 10:452531w16354
The Online Nautical Almanac- beware!George Huxtable6 Jul 2004, 10:452516w16352
Refraction. was: Bubble Horizon Altitude CorrectionsGeorge Huxtable6 Jul 2004, 10:458708w16350
Re: Refraction. was: Bubble Horizon Altitude CorrectionsRichard B. Langley6 Jul 2004, 02:255652w16348
Re: Bubble Horizon Follow UpFrank Reed6 Jul 2004, 01:137392w16346
Re: Bubble Horizon Altitude CorrectionsFrank Reed6 Jul 2004, 00:355010w16344
Re: Bubble Horizon Altitude CorrectionsFrank Reed6 Jul 2004, 00:145461w16342
Re: The Online Nautical Almanac- beware!Frank Reed5 Jul 2004, 23:393062w16340
Re: A NEW Online Nautical AlmanacFrank Reed5 Jul 2004, 23:083716w16338
Silico Sea 26 set, drift, and leewayBill B5 Jul 2004, 22:403197w16336
Re: Refraction. was: Bubble Horizon Altitude CorrectionsJohn Brenneise5 Jul 2004, 22:309232w16334
Bubble Horizon Follow UpBill B5 Jul 2004, 22:167302w16332
Refraction. was: Bubble Horizon Altitude CorrectionsGeorge Huxtable5 Jul 2004, 21:447237w16330
Re: Bubble Horizon Altitude CorrectionsGeorge Huxtable5 Jul 2004, 16:338515w16326
Re: The Online Nautical Almanac- beware!Ken Muldrew5 Jul 2004, 16:213983w16324
Re: A NEW Online Nautical AlmanacJohn Brenneise5 Jul 2004, 16:2413496w16322
Re: Silico Sea 26 AND 28Peter Fogg5 Jul 2004, 06:492360w16318
Re: Bubble Horizon Altitude CorrectionsFrank Reed5 Jul 2004, 05:097319w16316
A NEW Online Nautical AlmanacFrank Reed5 Jul 2004, 04:4810833w16314
Re: The Online Nautical Almanac- beware!Frank Reed5 Jul 2004, 03:598666w16312
Bubble Horizon Altitude CorrectionsBill B4 Jul 2004, 23:098059w16310
The Online Nautical Almanac- beware!George Huxtable4 Jul 2004, 20:365283w16308
Re: Silico Sea 26 AND 28Peter Fogg4 Jul 2004, 07:1110070w16306
Silico Sea 26 AND 28Mike Burkes3 Jul 2004, 19:224448w16304
More Online Lunars CalcsFrank Reed1 Jul 2004, 02:393196w16302
Re: Online Lunars CalcsFrank Reed29 Jun 2004, 11:333615w16300
Re: Online Lunars CalcsFrank Reed29 Jun 2004, 11:273035w16298
Re: Online Lunars CalcsKieran Kelly29 Jun 2004, 07:559210w16296
Recent Lunars Seminar in MysticFrank Reed28 Jun 2004, 09:432589w16294
Online Lunars CalcsFrank Reed28 Jun 2004, 09:402705w16292
Re: Refilling a compassHenry Halboth24 Jun 2004, 20:567479w16290
Re: Liquid-damped compasses. was: [NAV-L] Refilling a compassJoel Jacobs24 Jun 2004, 10:174727w16288
RES: RES: Recharging Compas MagnetJosé Otavio O. de Almeida23 Jun 2004, 22:205674w16286
Liquid-damped compasses. was: [NAV-L] Refilling a compassGeorge Huxtable23 Jun 2004, 22:293586w16284
Re: Refilling a compassRSPeterson23 Jun 2004, 21:115482w16282
Re: RES: Recharging Compas MagnetGeorge Huxtable23 Jun 2004, 19:514728w16280
Re: Refilling a compassJared Sherman23 Jun 2004, 19:176554w16278
Re: Refilling a compassHenry Halboth23 Jun 2004, 18:375551w16276
Re: Refilling a compassRSPeterson23 Jun 2004, 16:583823w16274
Re: Refilling a compass, was: Compass tiltCourtney Thomas23 Jun 2004, 16:325331w16272
Re: Refilling a compass, was: Compass tiltHenry Halboth22 Jun 2004, 15:424922w16270
Re: Historical Magnetic Variation/DeclinationHenry Halboth22 Jun 2004, 15:315438w16268
Re: Historical Magnetic Variation/DeclinationGary LaPook22 Jun 2004, 09:398274w16266
Re: Refilling a compass, was: Compass tiltTrevor Kenchington21 Jun 2004, 20:083778w16264
Re: Compass tilt. and other compass issuesRobert Gainer21 Jun 2004, 17:359546w16262
Re: Refilling a compass, was: Compass tiltN S Gurnell21 Jun 2004, 16:234039w16260
Re: Compass tilt. and other compass issuesRSPeterson21 Jun 2004, 16:578638w16258
Re: Refilling a compass, was: Compass tiltJared Sherman21 Jun 2004, 02:064764w16256
Re: Historical Magnetic Variation/DeclinationTrevor Kenchington20 Jun 2004, 21:064545w16254
Refilling a compass, was: Compass tiltTrevor Kenchington20 Jun 2004, 21:253693w16252
Re: Historical Magnetic Variation/DeclinationJoel Jacobs20 Jun 2004, 22:428630w16250
Re: Compass tilt. Was: Historical Magnetic Variation/DeclinationJared Sherman20 Jun 2004, 22:032322w16248
Compass tilt. Was: Historical Magnetic Variation/DeclinationGeorge Huxtable20 Jun 2004, 21:474702w16246
Re: Historical Magnetic Variation/DeclinationRSPeterson20 Jun 2004, 20:098113w16244
RES: Recharging Compas MagnetJosé Otavio O. de Almeida20 Jun 2004, 18:553624w16242
Re: An enjoyable paperback.George Huxtable20 Jun 2004, 09:192739w16240
Re: Historical Magnetic Variation/DeclinationGeorge Huxtable20 Jun 2004, 09:193822w16238
Recharging Compas MagnetZvi Doron20 Jun 2004, 07:462432w16236
Re: Historical Magnetic Variation/DeclinationRichard M Pisko20 Jun 2004, 06:002618w16234
Re: GPS Reliability -- Warnings surely must be a HOAXJared Sherman20 Jun 2004, 03:563385w16232
Re: GPS Reliability -- Warnings surely must be a HOAXKeith Williams20 Jun 2004, 03:322623w16230
Re: GPS Reliability -- Warnings surely must be a HOAXJohn Brenneise20 Jun 2004, 02:318028w16228
Re: Historical Magnetic Variation/DeclinationBrooke Clarke20 Jun 2004, 01:576440w16226
Re: Historical Magnetic Variation/DeclinationFrank Reed20 Jun 2004, 01:482499w16224
Re: Historical Magnetic Variation/DeclinationFrank Reed20 Jun 2004, 01:283951w16222
Re: GPS ReliabilityPhilip Ouvry19 Jun 2004, 21:004014w16220
Re: Historical Magnetic Variation/DeclinationBrooke Clarke19 Jun 2004, 20:369675w16218
Re: Historical Magnetic Variation/DeclinationFrank Reed19 Jun 2004, 20:266311w16216
Re: Historical Magnetic Variation/DeclinationFrank Reed19 Jun 2004, 20:116657w16214
Re: An enjoyable paperback.Doug19 Jun 2004, 17:392149w16212
Re: An enjoyable paperback.Dan Allen19 Jun 2004, 15:473570w16210
An enjoyable paperback.George Huxtable19 Jun 2004, 07:312744w16208
Compass variation ca. 1800Ken Muldrew17 Jun 2004, 20:563919w16206
Re: Historical Magnetic Variation/DeclinationJared Sherman14 Jun 2004, 19:282863w16204
Re: Historical Magnetic Variation/DeclinationBill B14 Jun 2004, 18:463201w16202
Re: Historical Magnetic Variation/DeclinationJim Thompson14 Jun 2004, 10:216697w16200
Re: Historical Magnetic Variation/DeclinationGeorge Huxtable14 Jun 2004, 10:115949w16198
Historical Magnetic Variation/DeclinationFrank Reed13 Jun 2004, 23:563706w16196
The Vanishing Black Drop...Frank Reed12 Jun 2004, 19:173013w16194
Re: My View of the Transit of VenusDan Allen9 Jun 2004, 06:472748w16192
Transit of Venus; the "black drop"George Huxtable8 Jun 2004, 23:536205w16190
Re: My View of the Transit of VenusChuck Taylor8 Jun 2004, 22:191793w16188
Re: My View of the Transit of VenusFrank Reed8 Jun 2004, 21:183055w16186
Venus Transit, sometimes cloudy...Frank Reed8 Jun 2004, 21:116674w16184
Re: My View of VenusKen Muldrew8 Jun 2004, 19:472754w16182
Re: My View of VenusDavid Edwards8 Jun 2004, 19:372623w16180
Re: My View of VenusRobert Eno8 Jun 2004, 13:542086w16178
Re: My View of VenusKen Muldrew8 Jun 2004, 16:132332w16176
My View of VenusDavid Edwards8 Jun 2004, 14:435740w16174
My View of VenusAndrew Corl8 Jun 2004, 13:213950w16172
Re: My View of the Transit of VenusRobert Eno8 Jun 2004, 07:472223w16170
Re: My View of the Transit of VenusFred Hebard8 Jun 2004, 13:075873w16168
Re: My View of the Transit of VenusRobert Eno8 Jun 2004, 07:415492w16166
Re: My View of the Transit of VenusFred Hebard8 Jun 2004, 13:001880w16164
Re: My View of the Transit of VenusJohn Kabel8 Jun 2004, 12:383444w16162
Re: My View of the Transit of VenusMarty8 Jun 2004, 10:583063w16160
Schools and transit of VenusAubrey O´Callaghan8 Jun 2004, 09:334177w16158
Re: My View of the Transit of VenusJim Thompson8 Jun 2004, 09:316997w16156
Report on Venus Transit in UK.George Huxtable8 Jun 2004, 09:233168w16154
Re: My View of the Transit of VenusKeith Williams8 Jun 2004, 08:1315087w16152
Re: My View of the Transit of VenusKieran Kelly8 Jun 2004, 08:0614716w16150
My View of the Transit of VenusGlendon8 Jun 2004, 06:565084w16148
May's book on navigation historyFrank Reed8 Jun 2004, 00:102696w16146
Re: Measure-All Inc. of Japan. Is this a Tamaya?Renee Mattie6 Jun 2004, 14:332590w16144
Re: Measure-All Inc. of Japan. Is this a Tamaya?Joel Jacobs5 Jun 2004, 23:073836w16142
Measure-All Inc. of Japan. Is this a Tamaya?Renee Mattie5 Jun 2004, 21:083287w16140
An 5851-1Ken Gebhart3 Jun 2004, 14:571844w16138
Re: Sextant AN 5851-1Ken Gebhart3 Jun 2004, 14:553482w16136
Re: Sextant AN 5851-1Robert Eno3 Jun 2004, 08:044574w16134
Re: Sextant AN 5851-1Robert Eno3 Jun 2004, 07:513248w16132
Sextant AN 5851-1Peter Henry3 Jun 2004, 04:223069w16130
Re: Faint stars easier to find on the horizon first?Joel Jacobs2 Jun 2004, 09:526448w16128
Re: David Thompson's Navigational TechniqueKen Muldrew2 Jun 2004, 01:553101w16126
Re: David Thompson's Navigational TechniqueFrank Reed1 Jun 2004, 23:438583w16124
Re: David Thompson's Navigational TechniqueKen Muldrew1 Jun 2004, 17:394766w16122
Re: : David Thompson's Navigational TechniqueKen Muldrew1 Jun 2004, 15:474589w16120
Re: Faint stars easier to find on the horizon first?Fred Hebard1 Jun 2004, 12:264076w16118
Re: : David Thompson's Navigational TechniqueGeorge Huxtable1 Jun 2004, 12:272911w16116
Re: Faint stars easier to find on the horizon first?Jim Thompson1 Jun 2004, 10:123774w16114
Re: David Thompson's Navigational TechniqueKen Muldrew1 Jun 2004, 03:512948w16112
Re: LUNARS SEMINAR at Mystic SeaportFred Hebard1 Jun 2004, 03:102094w16110
LUNARS SEMINAR at Mystic SeaportFrank Reed1 Jun 2004, 02:306101w16108
Re: Faint stars easier to find on the horizon first?Frank Reed1 Jun 2004, 02:263056w16106
Re: David Thompson's Navigational TechniqueFrank Reed1 Jun 2004, 02:245522w16104
Re: Letcher's Lunars MathFrank Reed1 Jun 2004, 02:234031w16102
Re: Sine curve to approximate declinationFrank Reed1 Jun 2004, 02:224956w16100
Re: Emergency sun declinationFrank Reed1 Jun 2004, 02:212981w16098
Re: Apollo spacecraft sextantFrank Reed1 Jun 2004, 02:202671w16096
Re: Faint stars easier to find on the horizon first?Frank Reed1 Jun 2004, 02:196032w16094
Re: David Thompson's Navigational TechniqueFrank Reed1 Jun 2004, 02:126461w16092
Re: Faint stars easier to find on the horizon first?Henry Halboth1 Jun 2004, 01:253818w16090
Re:       Re: David Thompson's Navigational TechniqueMike Burkes31 May 2004, 23:497061w16088
Re: David Thompson's Navigational TechniqueBruce Stark31 May 2004, 22:3312006w16086
Re: David Thompson's Navigational TechniqueGeorge Huxtable31 May 2004, 21:592454w16084
Re:       Re: David Thompson's Navigational TechniqueKen Muldrew31 May 2004, 21:343383w16082
Re:       Re: David Thompson's Navigational TechniqueKen Muldrew31 May 2004, 20:113567w16080
Removal from ListDavid Martin31 May 2004, 19:532059w16078
Re:       Re: David Thompson's Navigational TechniqueFred Hebard31 May 2004, 19:233293w16076
Re:       Re: David Thompson's Navigational TechniqueBruce Stark31 May 2004, 19:034251w16074
Re:       David Thompson's Navi gational TechniqueKen Muldrew31 May 2004, 17:105575w16072
Re: David Thompson's Navigational TechniqueKen Muldrew31 May 2004, 16:5410362w16070
Re: Lewis & ClarkBruce Stark31 May 2004, 13:046696w16068
Re:       David Thompson's Navigational TechniqueBruce Stark31 May 2004, 00:375039w16066
Re: Lewis & ClarkPaul Hirose30 May 2004, 21:186336w16064
Re: Lewis & ClarkGeorge Huxtable29 May 2004, 21:4110264w16062
Re: David Thompson's Navigational TechniqueGeorge Huxtable29 May 2004, 21:417105w16060
Re: Faint stars easier to find on the horizon first?Jim Thompson29 May 2004, 20:062665w16058
Re: Seeing stars and planets in the daytime.Jim Thompson29 May 2004, 19:512724w16056
Re: Faint stars easier to find on the horizon first?Trevor Kenchington28 May 2004, 15:162447w16054
Venus on the MeridianN S Gurnell29 May 2004, 00:332191w16052
Seeing stars and planets in the daytime.George Huxtable28 May 2004, 23:196157w16050
Re: Faint stars easier to find on the horizon first?Gary Harkins28 May 2004, 20:534860w16048
Re: David Thompson's Navigational TechniqueKen Muldrew28 May 2004, 19:312640w16046
Lewis & ClarkBruce Stark28 May 2004, 19:123367w16044
Re:       David Thompson's Navigational TechniqueBruce Stark28 May 2004, 18:414572w16042
David Thompson's Navigational TechniqueKen Muldrew28 May 2004, 17:3529080w16040
Re: Faint stars easier to find on the horizon first?Henry Halboth28 May 2004, 17:004195w16038
Re: Faint stars easier to find on the horizon first?Fred Hebard28 May 2004, 12:343425w16036
Re: Faint stars easier to find on the horizon first?Trevor Kenchington28 May 2004, 08:553253w16034
Re: "The Bounty II"Robert Eno28 May 2004, 03:262037w16032
"The Bounty II"Doug Royer28 May 2004, 01:093765w16030
"The Bounty"Doug Royer27 May 2004, 17:274935w16028
Re: Emergency sun declinationFred Hebard27 May 2004, 13:257265w16026
Re:       Re: † † † Re: Lewis & ClarkBruce Stark26 May 2004, 21:582936w16024
Re:       Re: Lewis & ClarkKen Muldrew26 May 2004, 20:533379w16022
Re:       Re: Lewis & ClarkBruce Stark26 May 2004, 19:574861w16020
Re: Lewis & ClarkKen Muldrew26 May 2004, 17:217418w16018
Re: Emergency sun declinationJim Thompson26 May 2004, 00:142396w16014
Lewis & ClarkBruce Stark25 May 2004, 22:496652w16012
Re: Emergency sun declinationBill Noyce25 May 2004, 12:503287w16010
Re: Emergency sun declinationJim Thompson24 May 2004, 23:022851w16008
Re: Faint stars easier to find on the horizon first?Gary Harkins24 May 2004, 22:294905w16006
Re: Faint stars easier to find on the horizon first?Jim Thompson24 May 2004, 22:272413w16004
Re: Faint stars easier to find on the horizon first?Doug Royer24 May 2004, 21:542567w16002
Faint stars easier to find on the horizon first?Jim Thompson24 May 2004, 21:302621w16000
Re: Emergency sun declinationJim Thompson24 May 2004, 21:252361w15998
Re: Apollo spacecraft sextantTrevor Kenchington23 May 2004, 09:584762w15996
Re: UTM to Lat LongSam Critchley22 May 2004, 22:413350w15994
Re: UTM to Lat LongSam Critchley22 May 2004, 22:302701w15992
UTM to Lat LongRobert Eno22 May 2004, 20:274327w15990
Re: Emergency sun declinationHenry Halboth22 May 2004, 20:194090w15988
Re: Emergency sun declinationJim Thompson22 May 2004, 14:532323w15986
Re: Emergency sun declinationFred Hebard22 May 2004, 02:185668w15984
Re: Emergency sun declinationFred Hebard22 May 2004, 02:053613w15982
Re: Emergency sun declinationTrevor Kenchington21 May 2004, 21:494914w15980
Re: Emergency sun declinationDoug Royer21 May 2004, 23:183218w15978
Re: Emergency sun declinationDoug Royer21 May 2004, 22:285594w15976
Re: Emergency sun declinationFred Hebard21 May 2004, 21:095395w15974
Re: Letcher's Lunars MathBill Noyce21 May 2004, 16:022666w15972
Re: Letcher's Lunars MathGeorge Huxtable21 May 2004, 15:5216922w15970
Re: Sine curve to approximate declinationWolfgang Köberer21 May 2004, 14:562813w15968
Re: Emergency sun declinationKen Gebhart21 May 2004, 03:153149w15966
Re: Emergency sun declinationFred Hebard21 May 2004, 01:392591w15964
Re: Emergency sun declinationDoug Royer20 May 2004, 23:466578w15962
Re:       Re: Index ErrorBruce Stark20 May 2004, 23:132650w15960
Re: Index ErrorBruce Stark20 May 2004, 22:372695w15958
Re: Emergency sun declinationFrank Reed20 May 2004, 21:463199w15956
Re: Sine curve to approximate declinationGeorge Huxtable20 May 2004, 21:032916w15954
Re: Emergency sun declinationDoug Royer20 May 2004, 20:484900w15952
Letcher's Lunars MathFrank Reed20 May 2004, 19:2012595w15950
Re: Sine curve to approximate declinationFrank Reed20 May 2004, 18:282851w15948
Re: Sine curve to approximate declinationFrank Reed20 May 2004, 18:267291w15946
Re: Sine curve to approximate declinationTrevor Kenchington19 May 2004, 21:133198w15944
Re: Sine curve to approximate declinationGeorge Huxtable20 May 2004, 09:464469w15942
Very unusual sextantKieran Kelly20 May 2004, 07:177974w15940
Re: HMS BountyFred Hebard20 May 2004, 03:003768w15938
Re: Emergency sun declinationRobert Eno20 May 2004, 02:383940w15936
Re: Emergency sun declinationKen Gebhart20 May 2004, 02:253427w15934
Re: Declination worksheetDan Allen20 May 2004, 00:048369w15932
Re: Declination worksheetFrank Reed19 May 2004, 22:585323w15930
Re: Sine curve to approximate declinationFrank Reed19 May 2004, 22:583313w15928
Re: Emergency sun declinationFrank Reed19 May 2004, 22:323497w15926
Re: Telescope danger to sight. Was: Venus transit ...Jared Sherman19 May 2004, 21:382827w15924
Emergency sun declinationJim Thompson19 May 2004, 21:372596w15922
Declination worksheetDan Allen19 May 2004, 20:2015806w15920
Sine curve to approximate declinationDan Allen19 May 2004, 20:094075w15918
Re: HMS BountyHenry Halboth19 May 2004, 18:585754w15916
Re: HMS BountyWilliam Allen19 May 2004, 16:383552w15914
Re: HMS BountyCarl Herzog19 May 2004, 13:342528w15912
Re: HMS Bounty chronometerGeorge Huxtable19 May 2004, 10:074649w15910
Re: HMS Bounty chronometerPaul Hirose19 May 2004, 05:082543w15908
Re: HMS BountyRobert Eno19 May 2004, 01:475117w15906
Re: HMS BountyFred Hebard18 May 2004, 22:203191w15904
Re: HMS BountyGeorge Huxtable18 May 2004, 21:447991w15902
Re: HMS BountyDoug Royer18 May 2004, 17:535283w15900
Re: HMS BountyRobert Eno18 May 2004, 08:483968w15898
Re: FW: Astra IIIB and prismJoel Jacobs18 May 2004, 05:283261w15896
Re: HMS BountyDoug Royer18 May 2004, 01:265270w15894
Re: HMS BountyRobert Eno18 May 2004, 00:314138w15892
HMS BountyDoug Royer17 May 2004, 19:072354w15890
FW: Astra IIIB and prismDoug Royer17 May 2004, 16:182710w15888
Sextant tripodJim Thompson16 May 2004, 10:472093w15886
Re: Clearing Lunar Distances by trigonometryDan Allen15 May 2004, 22:303863w15884
Re: Telescope danger to sight.(apology)George Huxtable15 May 2004, 13:402124w15882
Re: Telescope danger to sight.George Huxtable14 May 2004, 20:262814w15880
Re: Telescope danger to sight.Robert Eno14 May 2004, 14:374047w15878
Re: Telescope danger to sight.Jim Thompson14 May 2004, 19:482400w15876
Re: Telescope danger to sight.Ted Gerrard14 May 2004, 16:532060w15874
Re: Telescope danger to sight.Ken Gebhart14 May 2004, 15:545144w15872
Re: Telescope danger to sight.Jim Thompson14 May 2004, 10:584852w15870
Re: Telescope danger to sight. Was: Venus transit ...Jim Thompson14 May 2004, 10:5811430w15868
Re: Telescope danger to sight. Was: Venus transit ...Kieran Kelly14 May 2004, 08:525927w15866
Re: Telescope danger to sight. Was: Venus transit ...Jared Sherman13 May 2004, 22:343137w15864
Re: Telescope danger to sight. Was: Venus transit ...George Huxtable13 May 2004, 21:073774w15862
Re: Telescope danger to sight. Was: Venus transit ...Ken Muldrew13 May 2004, 17:303948w15860
Re: VenusWolfgang Köberer13 May 2004, 16:2113349w15858
Re: Telescope danger to sight. Was: Venus transit ...Richard B. Langley13 May 2004, 15:158165w15856
Re: Telescope danger to sight. Was: Venus transit ...Jared Sherman13 May 2004, 14:443770w15854
Re: Telescope danger to sight. Was: Venus transit ...George Huxtable13 May 2004, 10:366841w15852
Re: Lunar Distances - trigonometric clearingJim Thompson13 May 2004, 10:002909w15850
Re: Telescope danger to sight. Was: Venus transit ...Jim Thompson13 May 2004, 10:002687w15848
Re: Lunar Distances - trigonometric clearingJohn Brenneise13 May 2004, 05:373410w15846
Re: VenusFrank Reed13 May 2004, 05:338456w15844
Re: Telescope danger to sight. Was: Venus transit ...Rodney Myrvaagnes13 May 2004, 04:352692w15842
Re: Lunar Distances - trigonometric clearingHenry Halboth13 May 2004, 03:312870w15840
Clearing Lunar Distances by trigonometryHenry Halboth13 May 2004, 03:103264w15838
Re: Lunar Distances - trigonometric clearingFred Hebard13 May 2004, 01:522546w15836
Re: VenusFred Hebard13 May 2004, 01:474287w15834
Re: Lunar Distances - trigonometric clearingHenry Halboth13 May 2004, 01:171907w15832
Lunar Distances - trigonometric clearingHenry Halboth13 May 2004, 01:053546w15830
VenusRobert Eno13 May 2004, 00:415578w15828
Re: Telescope danger to sight. Was: Venus transit ...Jared Sherman13 May 2004, 00:289874w15826
Re: Venus transit June 8 and sextantsFrank Reed12 May 2004, 23:155052w15824
Re: Telescope danger to sight. Was: Venus transit ...Ken Muldrew12 May 2004, 23:104513w15822
Re: Telescope danger to sight. Was: Venus transit ...Ken Gebhart12 May 2004, 22:483411w15820
Re: Venus transit June 8 and sextantsGeorge Huxtable12 May 2004, 22:203305w15818
Re: Telescope danger to sight. Was: Venus transit ...George Huxtable12 May 2004, 22:207058w15816
Re: Venus transit June 8 and sextantsFrank Reed12 May 2004, 20:163651w15814
Re: Venus transit June 8 and sextantsRobert Eno12 May 2004, 13:285795w15812
Re: Telescope danger to sight. Was: Venus transit ...Jared Sherman12 May 2004, 18:153355w15810
Telescope danger to sight. Was: Venus transit ...George Huxtable12 May 2004, 16:036537w15808
Silicon Sea Leg 90 ANSWERSDan Hogan12 May 2004, 13:543407w15806
Re: Venus transit June 8 and sextantsFred Hebard12 May 2004, 13:293844w15804
Re: Venus transit June 8 and sextantsFrank Reed12 May 2004, 10:175023w15802
Re: Venus transit June 8 and sextantsRobert Eno11 May 2004, 23:562712w15800
Re: Venus transit June 8 and sextantsFrank Reed11 May 2004, 05:102478w15798
Re: Venus transit June 8 and sextantsFrank Reed11 May 2004, 03:476001w15796
Re: 1491 The year China discovered longitudeFrank Reed10 May 2004, 22:482590w15794
Re: 1491 The year China discovered longitudeGeorge Huxtable10 May 2004, 22:442108w15792
Re: Wharton & Field's Hydrographical SurveyingFrank Reed10 May 2004, 20:1210095w15790
Re: 1491 The year China discovered longitudeTrevor Kenchington9 May 2004, 22:358550w15788
Re: 1491 The year China discovered longitudeGeorge Huxtable10 May 2004, 14:025988w15786
Re: Wharton & Field's Hydrographical SurveyingWolfgang Köberer10 May 2004, 12:278911w15784
Re: Wharton & Field's Hydrographical SurveyingFred Hebard10 May 2004, 03:342840w15782
Re: Wharton & Field's Hydrographical SurveyingRobert Eno9 May 2004, 20:522396w15780
Venus transit June 8 and sextantsJim Thompson9 May 2004, 22:237026w15778
Easy Lunars TYPO and an extra 10%Frank Reed9 May 2004, 21:4311833w15776
Re: Laser to the Moon, was: next lunar eclipseFrank Reed9 May 2004, 20:514288w15774
Longitude on the "Pilgrim" 1835 (Dana)Frank Reed9 May 2004, 20:1814068w15772
Re: Laser to the Moon, was: next lunar eclipseBrooke Clarke9 May 2004, 18:588175w15770
Re: Wharton & Field's Hydrographical SurveyingFrank Reed9 May 2004, 18:353469w15768
Re: 1421 The year China discovered longitudeFrank Reed9 May 2004, 18:202647w15766
Re: 1491 The year China discovered longitudeFrank Reed9 May 2004, 18:193212w15764
Re: next lunar eclipseFrank Reed9 May 2004, 18:146363w15762
Re: 1421 The year China discovered longitudeFrank Reed9 May 2004, 18:003801w15760
Re: 1491 The year China discovered longitudeFrank Reed9 May 2004, 17:514255w15758
Re: 1491 The year China discovered longitudeFrank Reed9 May 2004, 17:423433w15756
Re: 1491 The year China discovered longitudeFrank Reed9 May 2004, 17:3011671w15754
Re: Wharton & Field's Hydrographical SurveyingFred Hebard9 May 2004, 16:342170w15752
Wharton & Field's Hydrographical SurveyingFred Hebard9 May 2004, 14:096500w15750
Re: 1421 The year China discovered longitudeTrevor Kenchington8 May 2004, 23:304612w15748
Re: 1421 The year China discovered longitudeTrevor Kenchington9 May 2004, 09:193148w15746
Re: 1491 The year China discovered longitudeGeorge Huxtable9 May 2004, 12:137026w15744
Next lunar eclipseTed Gerrard9 May 2004, 11:153995w15742
Re: 1421 The year China discovered longitudeGeoffrey Kolbe9 May 2004, 09:342910w15740
Re: 1421 The year China discovered longitudeKieran Kelly9 May 2004, 01:185216w15738
Re: 1491 The year China discovered longitudeTrevor Kenchington8 May 2004, 12:273793w15736
Re-Issue of Leg 89Dan Hogan8 May 2004, 20:256032w15734
C.Plath SextantsRobert Eno8 May 2004, 18:153800w15732
Re: 1491 The year China discovered longitudeGeorge Huxtable8 May 2004, 15:0111771w15730
Re: 1491 The year China discovered longitudeRichard B. Langley8 May 2004, 14:449129w15728
Re: 1491 The year China discovered longitudeTrevor Kenchington8 May 2004, 10:387652w15726
Re: 1491 The year China discovered longitudeAntónio Canas8 May 2004, 13:403669w15724
Re: 1491 The year China discovered longitudePhilip Bailey8 May 2004, 13:022542w15722
Re: 1491 The year China discovered longitudeAntónio Canas8 May 2004, 10:079147w15720
1491 The year China discovered longitudeKieran Kelly8 May 2004, 04:178611w15718
Re: What is a "Rare Brass List Compass& Clinometer,Deflector"RS Peterson7 May 2004, 21:324356w15716
Re: Halley's lunars, back in 1698-1700George Huxtable7 May 2004, 21:097626w15714
Re: Index ErrorFred Hebard7 May 2004, 20:192557w15712
Re: Index ErrorRobert Eno7 May 2004, 14:545640w15710
Re: What is a "Rare Brass List Compass& Clinometer,Deflector"Joel Jacobs7 May 2004, 19:533214w15708
What is a "Rare Brass List Compass& Clinometer,Deflector"Brooke Clarke7 May 2004, 17:003204w15706
Re: Index ErrorTrevor Kenchington7 May 2004, 12:524329w15704
Re: Index ErrorGeorge Huxtable7 May 2004, 14:304375w15702
Re: Russian barographAubrey O´Callaghan7 May 2004, 13:166253w15700
Re: political messages on Navigation-LDan Hogan7 May 2004, 12:542516w15698
Re: political messages on Navigation-LJoel Jacobs7 May 2004, 12:533895w15696
Russian barographFederico Rossi7 May 2004, 12:163201w15694
Re: political messages on Navigation-LWolfgang Köberer7 May 2004, 08:268791w15692
Re: Index ErrorFred Hebard7 May 2004, 05:004088w15690
Re: Apollo spacecraft sextantFred Hebard7 May 2004, 04:512713w15688
Re: political messages on Navigation-LGordon Talge7 May 2004, 03:574035w15686
Re: political messages on Navigation-LFred Hebard7 May 2004, 03:532071w15684
Re: political messages on Navigation-LCraig Scott7 May 2004, 02:483287w15682
Re: political messages on Navigation-LCraig Scott7 May 2004, 02:405343w15680
Re: Halley's lunars, back in 1698-1700Frank Reed6 May 2004, 23:266518w15678
Re: political messages on Navigation-LFrank Reed6 May 2004, 22:506622w15676
Re: Halley's lunars, back in 1698-1700George Huxtable6 May 2004, 22:332392w15674
Re: political messages on Navigation-LGeorge Huxtable6 May 2004, 22:332520w15672
Re: political messages on Navigation-LDoug Royer6 May 2004, 22:208202w15670
Re: political messages on Navigation-LDoug Royer6 May 2004, 21:539081w15668
Re: political messages on Navigation-LRobert Eno6 May 2004, 16:257360w15666
Re: political messages on Navigation-LDave Weilacher6 May 2004, 20:435187w15664
Re: political messages on Navigation-LDoug Royer6 May 2004, 20:215948w15662
Easy Lunars TYPO and an extra 10%Frank Reed6 May 2004, 19:4211446w15660
Political messages on Navigation-LFrank Reed6 May 2004, 19:093164w15658
Re: Halley's lunars, back in 1698-1700Wolfgang Köberer6 May 2004, 18:263418w15656
Voice of America Program on Navigation (Eleanor Cressy vs. GPS)Richard B. Langley6 May 2004, 02:422948w15654
Re: Index ErrorGary Harkins5 May 2004, 23:054036w15652
Re: Index ErrorGary Harkins5 May 2004, 22:594724w15650
Re: Sextant opticsPaul Hirose5 May 2004, 20:503626w15648
Re: Halley's lunars, back in 1698-1700Rodney Myrvaagnes5 May 2004, 18:452080w15646
Halley's lunars, back in 1698-1700 (corrected)George Huxtable5 May 2004, 18:342826w15644
Halley's lunars, back in 1698-1700George Huxtable5 May 2004, 16:4611131w15642
Re: Index ErrorGeorge Huxtable5 May 2004, 16:466030w15640
Re: Index ErrorRobert Eno5 May 2004, 10:013457w15638
Re: Index ErrorBill Noyce5 May 2004, 14:354962w15636
Re: Index ErrorRobert Eno5 May 2004, 08:573128w15634
Re: Index ErrorMarc Bernstein5 May 2004, 12:473238w15632
Re: Sextant opticsJoel Jacobs5 May 2004, 10:596995w15630
Re: Index ErrorMarty5 May 2004, 10:233702w15628
Re: Index ErrorFrank Reed5 May 2004, 09:548774w15626
Re: Sextant opticsRodney Myrvaagnes5 May 2004, 04:183001w15624
Index ErrorRobert Eno5 May 2004, 01:385752w15622
Re: Sextant opticsKen Gebhart4 May 2004, 22:112908w15620
Re: Sextant opticsGeorge Huxtable4 May 2004, 20:095755w15616
Re: Sextant opticsKen Muldrew4 May 2004, 16:286060w15612
Re: Sextant opticsJim Thompson4 May 2004, 13:452646w15610
Re: Apollo spacecraft sextantFrank Reed4 May 2004, 02:533872w15608
Re: Easy LunarsFrank Reed4 May 2004, 02:423209w15606
Re: Sextant opticsKen Gebhart4 May 2004, 02:256108w15604
Re: Apollo spacecraft sextantKen Muldrew4 May 2004, 01:533777w15602
Re: Easy LunarsKen Muldrew3 May 2004, 23:147544w15600
Reading Nav-L messages and s*p&a*mFrank Reed3 May 2004, 22:304627w15598
Re: Easy LunarsFrank Reed3 May 2004, 22:1618462w15596
Re: Apollo spacecraft sextantKen James3 May 2004, 22:004449w15594
Re: Apollo spacecraft sextantFrank Reed3 May 2004, 21:024721w15592
Re: Apollo spacecraft sextantFrank Reed3 May 2004, 20:4311844w15590
Re: Apollo spacecraft sextantRobert Eno3 May 2004, 12:276032w15588
Re: Hlep on Digital ChartsOlivier Le Diouris3 May 2004, 16:584612w15586
Will be off the ListBruce Stark3 May 2004, 16:412594w15584
Re: Apollo spacecraft sextantTrevor Kenchington2 May 2004, 22:234845w15582
Silicon Sea: Leg 91Dan Hogan3 May 2004, 13:595494w15580
Re: Hlep on Digital ChartsJim Theriot3 May 2004, 05:443620w15578
Re: Apollo spacecraft sextantFrank Reed3 May 2004, 00:1412345w15576
Re: Easy LunarsGeorge Huxtable2 May 2004, 17:2810120w15574
Re: Sextant opticsJoel Jacobs2 May 2004, 16:446016w15572
Re: Sextant opticsJim Thompson2 May 2004, 13:584151w15570
Re: Sextant opticsGary Harkins2 May 2004, 13:153927w15568
Apollo spacecraft sextantJim Thompson2 May 2004, 11:475209w15566
Sextant opticsJim Thompson2 May 2004, 11:024371w15564
Re: Book suggestion, please.Dan Hogan2 May 2004, 01:061901w15562
Re: Book suggestion, please.Peter Smith1 May 2004, 22:572072w15560
Re:       Re: Book suggestion, please.Bruce Stark1 May 2004, 01:023954w15558
Hlep on Digital ChartsOlivier Le Diouris30 Apr 2004, 23:473599w15556
Re: Book suggestion, please.Dan Allen30 Apr 2004, 23:262818w15554
Re: Book suggestion, please.Frank Reed30 Apr 2004, 23:197181w15552
Re: Easy LunarsFrank Reed30 Apr 2004, 22:322401w15550
Re: Book suggestion, please.Ken Gebhart30 Apr 2004, 22:322390w15548
Re: Book suggestion, please.Jared Sherman30 Apr 2004, 16:293787w15546
Re: Book suggestion, please.Henry Halboth30 Apr 2004, 16:004234w15544
Re: Book suggestion, please.Peter Smith30 Apr 2004, 14:003619w15542
Re: Book suggestion, please.Dan Hogan30 Apr 2004, 13:012116w15540
Book suggestion, please.George Huxtable30 Apr 2004, 12:332757w15538
Re: Easy LunarsGeorge Huxtable30 Apr 2004, 12:335152w15536
Re: Compass AdjustmentN S Gurnell30 Apr 2004, 01:302306w15534
Re: Compass AdjustmentN S Gurnell30 Apr 2004, 01:102666w15532
Re: theodolite altitude measurementsPaul Hirose29 Apr 2004, 21:334177w15530
Re: Easy LunarsDoug Royer29 Apr 2004, 20:582409w15528
Re: Easy LunarsGeorge Huxtable29 Apr 2004, 20:119597w15526
Re: Astrofixes and Len BeadellKieran Kelly29 Apr 2004, 07:576527w15524
Astrofixes and Len BeadellGreg Gilbert29 Apr 2004, 05:2112090w15522
Compass AdjustmentRobert Eno29 Apr 2004, 03:453918w15520
Re: Easy LunarsJim Thompson29 Apr 2004, 00:587850w15518
Re: Easy LunarsDan Allen29 Apr 2004, 00:1134986w15516
Re: Easy LunarsDoug Royer29 Apr 2004, 00:025558w15514
Easy LunarsFrank Reed28 Apr 2004, 23:2230228w15512
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work? PERSONAL SUMMARYJoel Jacobs28 Apr 2004, 12:297763w15510
Re: Inadvertent revelation.Richard M Pisko28 Apr 2004, 04:142258w15508
Re: Inadvertent revelation.Richard M Pisko28 Apr 2004, 02:073090w15506
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Ken Muldrew27 Apr 2004, 16:505327w15504
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?George Huxtable27 Apr 2004, 16:093895w15502
Half horizon mirrorsBill Arden27 Apr 2004, 16:143311w15500
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Jim Thompson27 Apr 2004, 10:062764w15498
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Trevor Kenchington26 Apr 2004, 20:343902w15496
Re: Astro COmpass Manual on line?Robert Eno27 Apr 2004, 01:022678w15494
Re: Astro COmpass Manual on line?Joel Jacobs26 Apr 2004, 21:172886w15492
Re: Astro COmpass Manual on line?Joel Jacobs26 Apr 2004, 21:023006w15490
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Robert Eno26 Apr 2004, 15:314837w15488
Re: Astro COmpass Manual on line?Paul Hirose26 Apr 2004, 20:442090w15486
Re: Astro COmpass Manual on line?Robert Eno26 Apr 2004, 15:192233w15484
Astro COmpass Manual on line?Brooke Clarke26 Apr 2004, 20:122414w15482
Re: Getting started with "clearing the lunar distance".John Brenneise26 Apr 2004, 19:403586w15480
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Ken Muldrew26 Apr 2004, 19:034966w15478
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?George Huxtable26 Apr 2004, 18:213233w15476
Re: Getting started with "clearing the lunar distance".George Huxtable26 Apr 2004, 18:213000w15474
Inadvertent revelation.George Huxtable26 Apr 2004, 14:292958w15472
Nav-l archives was Re: Getting started with "clearing the lunardistance".Cliff Sojourner26 Apr 2004, 05:342155w15470
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Ken Muldrew26 Apr 2004, 04:193565w15468
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Ken James26 Apr 2004, 04:062521w15466
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Ken James26 Apr 2004, 04:043768w15464
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Ken Muldrew26 Apr 2004, 02:005805w15462
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Ken Muldrew25 Apr 2004, 22:594202w15460
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Jim Thompson25 Apr 2004, 22:464004w15458
Re: Getting started with "clearing the lunar distance".John Brenneise25 Apr 2004, 22:283012w15456
Re: What do stars look like in your eye?Frank Reed25 Apr 2004, 22:183721w15454
Re: Sextant stands; was Lunar Distances: Graphic MethodsHenry Halboth25 Apr 2004, 21:593396w15452
Re: Lunars -Venus!Ken Muldrew25 Apr 2004, 18:563118w15450
Re: Lunars -Venus!Fred Hebard25 Apr 2004, 18:104374w15448
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Trevor Kenchington24 Apr 2004, 19:495499w15446
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Trevor Kenchington25 Apr 2004, 14:053298w15444
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Trevor Kenchington25 Apr 2004, 14:205293w15442
Re: Getting started with "clearing the lunar distance".Fred Hebard25 Apr 2004, 17:182560w15440
Re: Sextant stands; was Lunar Distances: Graphic MethodsRobert Eno25 Apr 2004, 14:493498w15438
Sextant StandsRobert Eno25 Apr 2004, 14:435230w15436
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Ken Muldrew25 Apr 2004, 14:164992w15434
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Ken Muldrew25 Apr 2004, 13:473429w15432
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Jim Thompson25 Apr 2004, 09:232801w15430
Re: Sextant stands; was Lunar Distances: Graphic MethodsKieran Kelly25 Apr 2004, 08:383170w15428
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Ken Muldrew25 Apr 2004, 06:184804w15426
Getting started with "clearing the lunar distance".John Brenneise25 Apr 2004, 05:272023w15424
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Ken Muldrew25 Apr 2004, 05:103104w15422
Re: What do stars look like in your eye?Ken Muldrew25 Apr 2004, 04:582949w15420
Re: Sextant stands; was Lunar Distances: Graphic MethodsHenry Halboth25 Apr 2004, 03:063247w15418
Re: Sextant stands; was Lunar Distances: Graphic MethodsJim Thompson25 Apr 2004, 00:023296w15416
Re: Lunar Distances: Graphic MethodsHenry Halboth24 Apr 2004, 20:536188w15414
Re: What do stars look like in your eye?Frank Reed24 Apr 2004, 17:445597w15412
Re: Lunar Distances: Graphic MethodsFrank Reed24 Apr 2004, 17:218125w15410
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Jim Thompson24 Apr 2004, 15:034342w15408
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Ken Muldrew24 Apr 2004, 14:104995w15406
Re: What do stars look like in your eye?Ken Muldrew24 Apr 2004, 13:584140w15404
Re: What do stars look like in your eye?Joel Jacobs24 Apr 2004, 13:274324w15402
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Joel Jacobs24 Apr 2004, 12:439477w15400
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Joel Jacobs24 Apr 2004, 10:482519w15398
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Jim Thompson24 Apr 2004, 12:043106w15396
What do stars look like in your eye?Jim Thompson24 Apr 2004, 11:553023w15394
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars.George Huxtable24 Apr 2004, 10:495050w15392
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?George Huxtable24 Apr 2004, 10:497956w15390
Re: Lunars -Venus!Jim Thompson24 Apr 2004, 10:256052w15388
Re: Lunars -Venus!Ken Muldrew24 Apr 2004, 04:354302w15386
Re: Lunar Distances: Graphic MethodsHenry Halboth24 Apr 2004, 03:194800w15384
Re: Lunars -Venus!Robert Eno24 Apr 2004, 02:332848w15382
Re: Lunars -Venus!Fred Hebard24 Apr 2004, 02:312536w15380
Re: Lunars -Venus!Frank Reed24 Apr 2004, 02:054409w15378
Re:       Re: Lunars -Venus!Frank Reed24 Apr 2004, 01:403406w15376
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Jim Thompson24 Apr 2004, 01:322258w15374
Re: Lunars -Venus!Jim Thompson24 Apr 2004, 01:172684w15372
Re:       Re: Lunars -Venus!Bruce Stark23 Apr 2004, 23:492692w15370
Re: Lunars -Venus!Frank Reed23 Apr 2004, 23:146460w15368
Re: Lunars -Venus!George Huxtable23 Apr 2004, 22:172446w15366
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Joel Jacobs23 Apr 2004, 22:165471w15364
Re: Lewis and Clark lunarsKen Muldrew23 Apr 2004, 22:183732w15362
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Fred Hebard23 Apr 2004, 21:432413w15360
Re: Lunars -Venus!Fred Hebard23 Apr 2004, 21:422554w15358
Re: Lewis and Clark lunarsFred Hebard23 Apr 2004, 21:316710w15356
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Ken Muldrew23 Apr 2004, 21:145421w15354
Lunars -Venus!Mike Burkes23 Apr 2004, 21:063996w15352
ReflectionsBill Arden23 Apr 2004, 20:204387w15350
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?George Huxtable23 Apr 2004, 19:337760w15348
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Paul Hirose23 Apr 2004, 18:122244w15346
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars - I think you've got it.Bill Noyce23 Apr 2004, 17:513363w15344
Re: Lunar Distances: Graphic MethodsFrank Reed23 Apr 2004, 17:486051w15342
Re: Lewis and Clark lunarsKen Muldrew23 Apr 2004, 17:288938w15340
Re: Lunar Distances: Graphic MethodsHenry Halboth23 Apr 2004, 16:244364w15338
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Ken Muldrew23 Apr 2004, 16:126309w15336
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Ken Muldrew23 Apr 2004, 15:543873w15334
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Ken Muldrew23 Apr 2004, 15:364318w15332
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Chuck Taylor23 Apr 2004, 15:302113w15330
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?George Huxtable23 Apr 2004, 15:304125w15328
Re: Lewis and Clark lunarsGeorge Huxtable23 Apr 2004, 15:305870w15326
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Fred Hebard23 Apr 2004, 15:053170w15324
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Bill Noyce23 Apr 2004, 14:293124w15322
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Fred Hebard23 Apr 2004, 13:565393w15320
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Jim Thompson23 Apr 2004, 13:042966w15318
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Joel Jacobs23 Apr 2004, 12:467435w15316
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Joel Jacobs23 Apr 2004, 12:4211355w15314
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Jim Thompson23 Apr 2004, 12:092205w15312
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Jim Thompson23 Apr 2004, 12:019578w15310
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Paul Hirose23 Apr 2004, 05:332090w15308
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Ken Muldrew23 Apr 2004, 01:555641w15306
Re:       Re: Lewis and Clark  lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataBruce Stark23 Apr 2004, 01:582735w15304
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Doug Royer23 Apr 2004, 00:402840w15302
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?George Huxtable23 Apr 2004, 00:053472w15300
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Joel Jacobs22 Apr 2004, 23:095133w15298
Re:       Re: † † † Re: Lewis and Clark  lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataHenry Halboth22 Apr 2004, 21:283799w15296
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Joel Jacobs22 Apr 2004, 21:563976w15294
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Fred Hebard22 Apr 2004, 21:163019w15292
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Jim Thompson22 Apr 2004, 21:052766w15290
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataFrank Reed22 Apr 2004, 21:004908w15288
Re: How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Doug Royer22 Apr 2004, 19:513585w15286
Re:       Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataKen Muldrew22 Apr 2004, 15:504834w15284
Re: 6x telescope does not fit AstraIIIb snugglyJim Thompson22 Apr 2004, 13:352611w15282
How does the AstraIIIb split mirror work?Jim Thompson22 Apr 2004, 13:253076w15280
History of marine navigationJim Thompson22 Apr 2004, 13:032752w15278
Re: Which Ship and Captain?Jim Thompson22 Apr 2004, 12:552584w15276
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac data HISTORY OFCELNAVJoel Jacobs22 Apr 2004, 11:315985w15274
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataRodney Myrvaagnes22 Apr 2004, 04:593667w15272
Which Ship and Captain?Gordon Talge22 Apr 2004, 04:072777w15270
Re:       Re: † † † Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Alma nac dataBruce Stark22 Apr 2004, 03:503318w15268
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataBruce Stark22 Apr 2004, 03:474126w15266
Re:       Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataDan Allen22 Apr 2004, 03:156949w15264
Lunar Distances: Graphic MethodsRobert Eno22 Apr 2004, 02:593067w15262
Re:Re:       Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataHenry Halboth22 Apr 2004, 02:354236w15260
Re:       Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataBruce Stark22 Apr 2004, 01:064651w15258
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataKen Muldrew21 Apr 2004, 22:516600w15256
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataFred Hebard21 Apr 2004, 22:133851w15254
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataFrank Reed21 Apr 2004, 21:434846w15252
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataFrank Reed21 Apr 2004, 21:335665w15250
Re: LunarsBruce Stark21 Apr 2004, 19:004529w15248
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataKieran Kelly21 Apr 2004, 09:263901w15246
Lecture on Janet Taylor: first lady of navigation.George Huxtable20 Apr 2004, 18:504992w15244
Nautical Almanac altitude corr. changesBob Batten20 Apr 2004, 15:235178w15242
Expedition to document Sumner's confluence?Jim Thompson20 Apr 2004, 12:003478w15240
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataKen Muldrew19 Apr 2004, 23:103738w15238
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataKen Muldrew19 Apr 2004, 22:103758w15236
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataKen Muldrew19 Apr 2004, 18:303266w15234
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataKen Muldrew19 Apr 2004, 18:045664w15232
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataFred Hebard19 Apr 2004, 15:543219w15230
Re: Error in Nautical Almanac Polaris SHA Feb-June?Bill Noyce19 Apr 2004, 12:572812w15228
RES: Dark Sky WeekJosé Otavio O. de Almeida19 Apr 2004, 12:0712996w15226
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataFrank Reed19 Apr 2004, 08:383281w15224
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataPaul Hirose19 Apr 2004, 06:504060w15222
Dark Sky WeekFrank Reed19 Apr 2004, 04:3710921w15220
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataFrank Reed19 Apr 2004, 04:063250w15218
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataFred Hebard19 Apr 2004, 03:302331w15216
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataFred Hebard19 Apr 2004, 03:265036w15214
Re: Error in Nautical Almanac Polaris SHA Feb-June?Trevor Kenchington17 Apr 2004, 22:175680w15212
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataFrank Reed18 Apr 2004, 23:308799w15210
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataGeorge Huxtable18 Apr 2004, 22:2311572w15208
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataGordon Talge18 Apr 2004, 21:144384w15206
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataFrank Reed18 Apr 2004, 17:119775w15204
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataKieran Kelly18 Apr 2004, 11:597901w15202
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataFrank Reed18 Apr 2004, 01:4612472w15200
Re: Error in Nautical Almanac Polaris SHA Feb-June?Jim Thompson17 Apr 2004, 19:403791w15198
Re: Error in Nautical Almanac Polaris SHA Feb-June?Jim Thompson17 Apr 2004, 19:093577w15196
Re: 6x telescope does not fit AstraIIIb snugglyJim Thompson17 Apr 2004, 19:093992w15194
Re: Error in Nautical Almanac Polaris SHA Feb-June?Jared Sherman17 Apr 2004, 18:492828w15192
Re:       Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataBruce Stark17 Apr 2004, 16:243210w15190
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataKen Muldrew17 Apr 2004, 15:183806w15188
Re: Error in Nautical Almanac Polaris SHA Feb-June?Pierre Boucher17 Apr 2004, 14:473580w15186
Re: Error in Nautical Almanac Polaris SHA Feb-June?Pierre Boucher17 Apr 2004, 14:423572w15184
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataKen Muldrew17 Apr 2004, 14:254509w15182
Re: 6x telescope does not fit AstraIIIb snugglyJoel Jacobs17 Apr 2004, 11:173288w15180
Error in Nautical Almanac Polaris SHA Feb-June?Jim Thompson17 Apr 2004, 10:482618w15178
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataFrank Reed17 Apr 2004, 10:217732w15176
6x telescope does not fit AstraIIIb snugglyJim Thompson17 Apr 2004, 08:362694w15174
Re: Hagner Position FinderZvi Doron17 Apr 2004, 06:404482w15172
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataKen Muldrew17 Apr 2004, 05:105088w15170
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataGeorge Huxtable16 Apr 2004, 23:045283w15168
Re: Hagner Position FinderZvi Doron16 Apr 2004, 21:144188w15166
Hagner Position FinderRobert Eno16 Apr 2004, 20:532898w15164
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataFrank Reed16 Apr 2004, 20:444820w15162
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataKen Muldrew16 Apr 2004, 19:103800w15160
Lewis and Clark lunars: more 1803 Almanac dataGeorge Huxtable16 Apr 2004, 16:335876w15158
Re: 1804 Almanac and Norie on the webFred Hebard16 Apr 2004, 03:393193w15156
Re: Silicon Sea: Leg 91Marty15 Apr 2004, 13:353306w15154
Re: 1804 Almanac and Norie on the webJim Thompson15 Apr 2004, 13:435679w15152
Silicon Sea: Leg 91Dan Hogan15 Apr 2004, 13:0111208w15150
Re: 1804 Almanac and Norie on the webFrank Reed14 Apr 2004, 02:082938w15148
1804 Almanac and Norie on the webFrank Reed14 Apr 2004, 01:353785w15146
Silicon Sea: Leg 90 ANSWERSDan Hogan13 Apr 2004, 13:033688w15144
Lewis and Clark lunars: 1803 Almabnac dataGeorge Huxtable12 Apr 2004, 18:014277w15142
Re:       Lewis and Clark lunars: 1803 Almabnac dataBruce Stark12 Apr 2004, 15:152923w15140
Lewis and Clark lunars: 1803 Almabnac dataGeorge Huxtable12 Apr 2004, 14:273234w15138
Lewis and Clark; the wandering MississippiGeorge Huxtable12 Apr 2004, 14:274234w15136
Re: L and C Group A Lunar!Jared Sherman12 Apr 2004, 01:512275w15134
Re: L and C Group A Lunar!George Huxtable11 Apr 2004, 23:184116w15132
L and C Group A Lunar!Mike Burkes11 Apr 2004, 17:164191w15130
Bounced Mail Navigation-LDan Hogan11 Apr 2004, 16:376057w15128
Re:       Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: a request for help.Bruce Stark10 Apr 2004, 18:503191w15126
Re:       Lewis and Clark lunars: a request for help.Bruce Stark10 Apr 2004, 02:014187w15124
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: a request for help.Arthur Pearson8 Apr 2004, 23:466055w15122
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: a request for help.George Huxtable8 Apr 2004, 23:457333w15120
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: a request for help.George Huxtable8 Apr 2004, 22:264920w15118
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: a request for help.Frank Reed8 Apr 2004, 22:136343w15116
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: a request for help.Ken Muldrew8 Apr 2004, 19:193127w15114
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: a request for help.Frank Reed8 Apr 2004, 17:423629w15112
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: a request for help.Geoffrey Kolbe8 Apr 2004, 15:562786w15110
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: a request for help.Wolfgang Köberer8 Apr 2004, 07:222574w15108
Re: Lewis and Clark lunars: a request for help.Dan Allen8 Apr 2004, 01:152598w15106
Lewis and Clark lunars: a request for help.George Huxtable7 Apr 2004, 23:4022665w15104
Re: Star-star sights (part 2)Doug Royer7 Apr 2004, 00:3233500w15102
Star-star sights (part 1)Frank Reed7 Apr 2004, 00:0117239w15100
Star-star sights (part 2)Frank Reed7 Apr 2004, 00:0330879w15098
Re: Silicon Sea: Leg 90Paul Hirose6 Apr 2004, 23:303207w15096
Re: Listserver Mail ResponseRodney Myrvaagnes6 Apr 2004, 22:432877w15094
Re: Listserver Mail ResponseRodney Myrvaagnes6 Apr 2004, 22:392452w15092
Listserver Mail ResponseDan Hogan6 Apr 2004, 21:343141w15090
Re: 1906 BowditchDan Allen6 Apr 2004, 21:121979w15088
Listserv quirk, was Re: Polaris isn't so easy!Rodney Myrvaagnes6 Apr 2004, 21:205731w15086
Fw: Polaris isn't so easy!Joel Jacobs6 Apr 2004, 20:393834w15084
1906 BowditchDan Allen6 Apr 2004, 20:313395w15082
Re: Polaris isn't so easy!Frank Reed6 Apr 2004, 19:117841w15080
FW: Polaris isn't so easy!Doug Royer6 Apr 2004, 18:333606w15078
Re: LunarsHenry Halboth6 Apr 2004, 18:135878w15076
Re: Polaris isn't so easy!Jim Thompson6 Apr 2004, 11:283413w15072
(no subject)Jeffrey Brantley6 Apr 2004, 05:531741w15068
Download H.O. 229, H.O. 249Frank Reed6 Apr 2004, 02:553265w15066
Re: Home brewed lunar distancesFrank Reed6 Apr 2004, 02:4412053w15064
Re: The cocked hatJoel Jacobs5 Apr 2004, 17:208430w15062
Re: Polaris isn't so easy!Robert Eno5 Apr 2004, 16:512992w15060
Re: The cocked hatRobert Eno5 Apr 2004, 16:447192w15058
Polaris isn't so easy!Jim Thompson5 Apr 2004, 11:052830w15056
Re: Error in PLSteven Wepster5 Apr 2004, 09:272886w15054
Re: Sight Reduction method accuracyGeorge Huxtable5 Apr 2004, 08:596657w15052
Name [was: Re: Long Term almanac]Steven Wepster5 Apr 2004, 08:142558w15050
Re: The cocked hatGeorge Huxtable5 Apr 2004, 06:453271w15048
Home brewed lunar distancesHerbert Prinz5 Apr 2004, 06:183268w15046
Re: Sight Reduction method accuracyMike Boersma5 Apr 2004, 04:005942w15044
Re: "100 Problems in Celestial Navigation"Joel Jacobs4 Apr 2004, 23:143298w15042
Re: The cocked hatJoel Jacobs4 Apr 2004, 22:225578w15040
Re: Sight Reduction method accuracyFrank Reed4 Apr 2004, 22:217349w15038
Re: "100 Problems in Celestial Navigation"Jared Sherman4 Apr 2004, 21:092657w15036
Re: Sight Reduction method accuracyGeorge Huxtable4 Apr 2004, 20:502386w15034
Re: The cocked hatGeorge Huxtable4 Apr 2004, 20:504289w15032
Re: "100 Problems in Celestial Navigation"Renee Mattie4 Apr 2004, 20:242990w15030
Re: Sight Reduction method accuracyHenry Halboth4 Apr 2004, 19:343880w15028
Re: The cocked hatJoel Jacobs4 Apr 2004, 19:028147w15026
Re: The cocked hatGeorge Huxtable4 Apr 2004, 16:096258w15024
Re: The cocked hatJoel Jacobs4 Apr 2004, 13:418516w15022
Re: The cocked hatJoel Jacobs4 Apr 2004, 13:378692w15020
Re: The cocked hatHenry Halboth4 Apr 2004, 05:157747w15018
The cocked hatRobert Eno4 Apr 2004, 03:075602w15016
Re: Continetal names, was: Round-the-globe almanacGeorge Huxtable3 Apr 2004, 17:112276w15012
Re: The cocked hat,again. Was: "100 Problems in Celestial Navigation"Joel Jacobs3 Apr 2004, 12:587617w15010
The cocked hat, again. Was: "100 Problems in Celestial Navigation"George Huxtable3 Apr 2004, 09:236082w15008
First to AmericaGordon Talge3 Apr 2004, 04:152888w15006
Re: "100 Problems in Celestial Navigation"Joel Jacobs2 Apr 2004, 23:104616w15004
Re: "100 Problems in Celestial Navigation"Herbert Prinz2 Apr 2004, 19:553215w15002
Re: Long Term almanacHerbert Prinz2 Apr 2004, 15:002019w15000
Continetal names, was: Round-the-globe almanacTrevor Kenchington2 Apr 2004, 09:014383w14998
Re: "100 Problems in Celestial Navigation"Joel Jacobs2 Apr 2004, 10:073507w14996
Re: Round-the-globe almanacGeorge Huxtable2 Apr 2004, 09:528170w14994
Re: "100 Problems in Celestial Navigation"Herbert Prinz2 Apr 2004, 06:303036w14992
Re: "100 Problems in Celestial Navigation"Rodney Myrvaagnes1 Apr 2004, 23:192774w14990
Re: Round-the-globe almanacHerbert Prinz1 Apr 2004, 23:034684w14988
Re: "100 Problems in Celestial Navigation"Dave Weilacher1 Apr 2004, 22:213486w14986
"100 Problems in Celestial Navigation"Renee Mattie1 Apr 2004, 22:032782w14984
Re: Round-the-globe almanacDoug Royer1 Apr 2004, 22:029188w14982
Re: Round-the-globe almanacRon Roizen1 Apr 2004, 21:289388w14980
Re: Silicon Sea: Leg 90Renee Mattie1 Apr 2004, 21:042107w14978
Re: Round-the-globe almanacGeorge Huxtable1 Apr 2004, 20:508581w14976
Re: Round-the-globe almanacHerbert Prinz1 Apr 2004, 17:033921w14974
Re: Long Term almanacHerbert Prinz1 Apr 2004, 15:263316w14972
Round-the-globe almanacRon Roizen1 Apr 2004, 13:052508w14970
Story of Sumner's line inventionJim Thompson1 Apr 2004, 10:352388w14968
Re: Long Term almanacSteven Wepster1 Apr 2004, 08:532714w14966
Silicon Sea: Leg 90Dan Hogan31 Mar 2004, 17:504763w14964
Re: Long Term almanacHerbert Prinz31 Mar 2004, 17:302280w14962
Re: Long Term almanacSteven Wepster31 Mar 2004, 16:513564w14960
Re: Accuracy/precision in plotting tools.Herbert Prinz31 Mar 2004, 01:492913w14958
Re: Accuracy/precision in plotting tools.Joel Jacobs31 Mar 2004, 00:127224w14956
Re: Accuracy/precision in plotting tools.Dan Hogan30 Mar 2004, 23:092004w14954
Long Term almanacMike Boersma30 Mar 2004, 22:133604w14952
Re: Accuracy/precision in plotting tools.Herbert Prinz30 Mar 2004, 20:496680w14950
Re: Accuracy/precision in plotting tools.Fred Hebard30 Mar 2004, 15:354401w14948
Accuracy/precision in plotting tools.Jim Thompson30 Mar 2004, 15:033660w14946
Re: Change in Altitude TablesBill Noyce29 Mar 2004, 17:043102w14944
Re: Artificial Horizon LevelsRobert Eno29 Mar 2004, 03:483147w14942
Re: Sextant TelescopesRodney Myrvaagnes29 Mar 2004, 03:232841w14940
Re: Artificial Horizon LevelsTrevor Kenchington28 Mar 2004, 20:594249w14938
Change in Altitude TablesRobert Eno29 Mar 2004, 00:464057w14936
Re: Artificial Horizon LevelsRobert Eno28 Mar 2004, 23:513873w14934
Error in PLPawan Rao28 Mar 2004, 15:502125w14933
Re: Artificial Horizon LevelsFred Hebard28 Mar 2004, 18:414145w14932
Artificial Horizon LevelsRobert Eno28 Mar 2004, 18:306200w14930
Re: Sextant TelescopesJoel Jacobs28 Mar 2004, 12:423955w14928
Re: Magnetic Variation - Lewis and Clark (corrections)George Huxtable28 Mar 2004, 10:155493w14926
Sextant TelescopesFred Hebard28 Mar 2004, 04:551736w14924
Re: Electrical WireRobert Eno27 Mar 2004, 20:434265w14922
Re: Pave Diagram / veater DiagramGeoffrey Kolbe27 Mar 2004, 08:052768w14920
Re: Electrical WireGeorge Huxtable26 Mar 2004, 21:543123w14918
Silicon Sea SScharts.zipDan Hogan26 Mar 2004, 19:452962w14916
Re: Pave Diagram / veater DiagramZvi Doron26 Mar 2004, 16:215155w14914
Re: Pave Diagram / veater DiagramWolfgang Köberer26 Mar 2004, 14:343306w14912
UnsuscribeGlenn Roberts26 Mar 2004, 11:232613w14910
Re: equinoxJim Thompson26 Mar 2004, 10:352884w14908
Re: Electrical WireRodney Myrvaagnes25 Mar 2004, 18:242765w14906
Re: A Good Sextant BuyRenee Mattie26 Mar 2004, 04:063057w14904
Ecliptic coordinate system (was equinoxes)Jim Thompson26 Mar 2004, 01:435551w14902
Re: Sextant Spare PartsJoel Jacobs26 Mar 2004, 00:393050w14900
Re: Drawing the Line - Edwin DansonGeorge Huxtable26 Mar 2004, 00:064001w14898
Re: equinoxGeorge Huxtable26 Mar 2004, 00:067018w14896
Re: Navy Mark V (AN 5851-1) averagerPaul Hirose25 Mar 2004, 23:574942w14894
Coordinate system online converterJim Thompson25 Mar 2004, 23:272168w14892
Re: Electrical WireKen Gebhart25 Mar 2004, 23:133468w14890
Re: Electrical WireRobert Eno25 Mar 2004, 23:082473w14888
Re: Navy Mark V (AN 5851-1)Ken Gebhart25 Mar 2004, 23:072371w14886
Re: A Good Sextant BuyRobert Eno25 Mar 2004, 22:553726w14884
Re: A Good Sextant BuyJoel Jacobs25 Mar 2004, 22:345004w14882
Fw: USNA Summer SeminarJoel Jacobs25 Mar 2004, 22:109216w14880
Re: Mason & Dixon reticle illuminationPaul Hirose25 Mar 2004, 21:593831w14878
Ebay sextant vendersDoug Royer25 Mar 2004, 20:452280w14876
Re: Drawing the Line - Edwin DansonJared Sherman25 Mar 2004, 20:382416w14874
Re: Plotting Sheets IN LOG BOOKSJoel Jacobs25 Mar 2004, 20:275041w14872
Re: Plotting Sheets IN LOG BOOKSJoel Jacobs25 Mar 2004, 20:254959w14870
Re: A Good Sextant BuyRenee Mattie25 Mar 2004, 20:223359w14868
Re: Homemade Plotting SheetsDan Hogan25 Mar 2004, 20:181957w14866
Re: Plotting Sheets IN LOG BOOKSPaul Houlston25 Mar 2004, 19:554270w14864
Re: Drawing the Line - Edwin DansonCliff Sojourner25 Mar 2004, 20:012958w14862
Re: Drawing the Line - Edwin DansonJared Sherman25 Mar 2004, 19:502518w14860
Re: Plotting Sheets IN LOG BOOKSJoel Jacobs25 Mar 2004, 19:453799w14858
Re: Electrical WireJoel Jacobs25 Mar 2004, 19:423471w14856
Re: Drawing the Line - Edwin DansonRenee Mattie25 Mar 2004, 19:293947w14854
Re: Plotting Sheets IN LOG BOOKSPaul Houlston25 Mar 2004, 18:507666w14852
Re: Electrical WireDoug Royer25 Mar 2004, 19:163357w14850
Re: Electrical WireKen James25 Mar 2004, 18:313485w14848
Re: Plotting Sheets IN LOG BOOKSJoel Jacobs25 Mar 2004, 17:535829w14846
Re: Electrical WireKen James25 Mar 2004, 17:482626w14844
Re: Electrical WireJared Sherman25 Mar 2004, 17:323379w14842
UnsuscribeAntonio Ballester25 Mar 2004, 17:042649w14840
Re: Drawing the Line - Edwin DansonBlackwood25 Mar 2004, 16:482512w14838
Re: Electrical WireRobert Eno25 Mar 2004, 11:262956w14836
Re: A Good Sextant BuyRobert Eno25 Mar 2004, 11:213631w14834
Plotting SheetsDan Hogan25 Mar 2004, 15:062951w14832
Re: Electrical WireDan Hogan25 Mar 2004, 14:572035w14830
Re: Electrical WireJoel Jacobs25 Mar 2004, 14:552714w14828
Re: A Good Sextant BuyJoel Jacobs25 Mar 2004, 14:563493w14826
Re: A Good Sextant BuyJoel Jacobs25 Mar 2004, 14:203577w14824
Re: A Good Sextant BuyRobert Eno25 Mar 2004, 13:452831w14822
Re: Electrical WireRobert Eno25 Mar 2004, 13:412394w14820
Re: A Good Sextant BuyKeith Williams25 Mar 2004, 13:322204w14818
Re: Electrical WireGeoffrey Butt24 Mar 2004, 17:532497w14816
A Good Sextant BuyJoel Jacobs25 Mar 2004, 13:111986w14814
Re: Drawing the Line - Edwin DansonFred Hebard25 Mar 2004, 03:553970w14812
Drawing the Line - Edwin DansonKieran Kelly25 Mar 2004, 03:275671w14810
Re: equinoxFred Hebard25 Mar 2004, 02:228325w14808
Re: Electrical Wire (minus 30???)Robert Eno24 Mar 2004, 22:595248w14806
Pave Diagram / veater DiagramZvi Doron24 Mar 2004, 21:212413w14804
Re: Sextants and Glue [was Sisteco Prismatic Compass]Fred Hebard24 Mar 2004, 18:315557w14802
Re: Electrical WireKen James24 Mar 2004, 18:152914w14800
Re: Sextants and Glue [was Sisteco Prismatic Compass]Doug Royer24 Mar 2004, 17:513956w14798
Re: Electrical WireJared Sherman24 Mar 2004, 16:313205w14796
Re: Electrical Wire (minus 30???)Keith Williams24 Mar 2004, 15:583096w14794
Re: Electrical WireRobert Eno24 Mar 2004, 13:243903w14792
Re: Electrical WireRobert Eno24 Mar 2004, 13:183555w14790
Re: Sextants and Glue [was Sisteco Prismatic Compass]Fred Hebard24 Mar 2004, 04:033224w14788
Navy Mark V (AN 5851-1)Peter Henry24 Mar 2004, 03:211961w14786
Re: Electrical WireRobert Eno24 Mar 2004, 02:493502w14784
Re: Electrical WireJared Sherman24 Mar 2004, 02:413224w14782
Re: Electrical WireCliff Sojourner24 Mar 2004, 01:523215w14780
Re: Electrical WireRobert Eno24 Mar 2004, 01:112915w14778
Re: Electrical WireJared Sherman23 Mar 2004, 18:242531w14776
Re: Electrical WireKen James23 Mar 2004, 17:233222w14774
Electrical WireRobert Eno23 Mar 2004, 13:363336w14772
Re: EquinoxJim Thompson23 Mar 2004, 01:2412273w14770
Re: Warning: Virus Attacks "From" WebkahunaGerard Mittelstaedt23 Mar 2004, 01:124764w14768
Re: Warning: Virus Attacks "From" WebkahunaJim Thompson22 Mar 2004, 23:463124w14766
Warning: Virus Attacks "From" WebkahunaJared Sherman22 Mar 2004, 22:053934w14764
Re: Observations On Buying A Used Sextant On EbayJoel Jacobs22 Mar 2004, 19:169370w14762
Re: EquinoxZorbec Legras22 Mar 2004, 18:443170w14760
Re: Observations On Buying A Used Sextant On EbayDoug Royer22 Mar 2004, 17:4314939w14758
Re: Celestial Navigation Software releasedOlivier Le Diouris22 Mar 2004, 16:575623w14756
EquinoxMichael Dorl22 Mar 2004, 16:343998w14754
Buying sextant on ebay....sometimes it worksJim Dullea22 Mar 2004, 14:152544w14752
Observations On Buying A Used Sextant On EbayJoel Jacobs22 Mar 2004, 11:3113887w14750
Sextants over the InternetGordon Talge22 Mar 2004, 06:093963w14748
Re: equinoxHerbert Prinz22 Mar 2004, 03:562600w14746
Re: equinoxPaul Hirose22 Mar 2004, 02:556507w14744
Re: equinoxFred Hebard22 Mar 2004, 02:352730w14742
Re: Cassens and Plath SextantJared Sherman22 Mar 2004, 02:022465w14740
Re: C+P NAVY MK III/PlathFred Hebard22 Mar 2004, 01:591878w14738
Re: C+P NAVY MK III/PlathKieran Kelly22 Mar 2004, 01:445798w14736
Re: equinoxHerbert Prinz22 Mar 2004, 01:382432w14734
Re: equinoxMichael Dorl22 Mar 2004, 01:132781w14732
Re: equinoxJay Borseth22 Mar 2004, 00:263488w14730
Re: Cassens and Plath SextantGary Harkins22 Mar 2004, 00:135527w14728
Re: C+P Navy Mk IiiRobert Eno22 Mar 2004, 00:094103w14726
Re: Cassens and Plath SextantRobert Eno22 Mar 2004, 00:063626w14724
Re: equinoxFred Hebard22 Mar 2004, 00:0497873w14722
Re: equinoxGary Harkins21 Mar 2004, 23:585163w14720
Re: Cassens and Plath SextantFred Hebard21 Mar 2004, 23:462704w14718
Re: Cassens and Plath SextantGary Harkins21 Mar 2004, 23:354439w14716
Re: equinoxZorbec Legras21 Mar 2004, 23:353189w14714
Re: Cassens and Plath SextantBrooke Clarke21 Mar 2004, 23:313523w14712
Re: Cassens and Plath SextantJared Sherman21 Mar 2004, 23:074683w14710
Re: Cassens and Plath SextantMike Boersma21 Mar 2004, 23:065985w14708
Re: Sextants and Glue [was Sisteco Prismatic Compass]Fred Hebard21 Mar 2004, 22:385898w14706
Re: Cassens and Plath SextantFred Hebard21 Mar 2004, 22:242443w14704
Cassens and Plath SextantGary Harkins21 Mar 2004, 21:353940w14702
Cassens and Plath SextantGary Harkins21 Mar 2004, 21:332981w14700
Re: equinoxDan Allen21 Mar 2004, 20:304609w14698
Re: equinoxFred Hebard21 Mar 2004, 20:203982w14696
Re: Magnetic Variation - Lewis and Clark (corrections)George Huxtable21 Mar 2004, 19:5212536w14694
Re: equinoxJim Thompson21 Mar 2004, 19:418037w14692
Re: C+P Navy Mk Iii Followup To My LastFred Hebard21 Mar 2004, 19:392530w14690
Re: C+P Navy Mk IiiJoel Jacobs21 Mar 2004, 19:306675w14688
Re: equinoxGary Harkins21 Mar 2004, 19:064745w14686
Re: equinoxGary Harkins21 Mar 2004, 19:014672w14684
Re: C+P Navy Mk IiiJoel Jacobs21 Mar 2004, 18:476634w14682
Re: equinoxZorbec Legras21 Mar 2004, 18:232513w14680
Re: C+P Navy Mk Iii Followup To My LastJared Sherman21 Mar 2004, 18:022479w14678
Re: C+P Navy Mk IiiRobert Eno21 Mar 2004, 16:285013w14676
Re: equinoxTrevor Kenchington21 Mar 2004, 09:263415w14674
Re: Sextant Comparisons -> to Joel Jacobs...Joel Jacobs21 Mar 2004, 06:039752w14672
Re: C+P Navy Mk IiiKen James21 Mar 2004, 05:417784w14670
Re: C+P Navy Mk Iii Followup To My LastJoel Jacobs21 Mar 2004, 05:307795w14668
Re: C+P Navy Mk IiiJoel Jacobs21 Mar 2004, 05:136756w14666
Re: equinoxGary Harkins21 Mar 2004, 04:134330w14664
Re: equinoxFred Hebard21 Mar 2004, 04:033124w14662
Re: equinoxFred Hebard21 Mar 2004, 03:532851w14660
Re: CN in a Planetarium?Renee Mattie21 Mar 2004, 01:592672w14658
Re: Sextant Comparisons -> to Joel Jacobs...Courtney Thomas21 Mar 2004, 01:168785w14656
Re: equinoxFred Hebard21 Mar 2004, 00:531762w14654
EquinoxFred Hebard21 Mar 2004, 00:481747w14652
Re: C+P Navy Mk IiiKieran Kelly20 Mar 2004, 23:385236w14650
Re: Celestial Navigation Software releasedMichael Dorl20 Mar 2004, 23:265583w14648
Re: equinoxTrevor Kenchington20 Mar 2004, 23:072729w14646
Re: Sextant Comparisons -> to Joel Jacobs...Joel Jacobs20 Mar 2004, 23:078477w14644
Re: Sextant Comparisons -> to Joel Jacobs...Courtney Thomas20 Mar 2004, 22:397405w14642
Re: Sextant Comparisons -> to Joel Jacobs...Courtney Thomas20 Mar 2004, 22:056697w14640
Re: C+P Navy Mk IiiJoel Jacobs20 Mar 2004, 21:343623w14638
Re: Exorcizing the Evil Effects of Parallactic Retardation(Modified by Fred Hebard)Fred Hebard20 Mar 2004, 21:1015765w14636
Re: Sextant ComparisonsJoel Jacobs20 Mar 2004, 21:076254w14634
Re: C+PPeter Smith20 Mar 2004, 21:072221w14632
Re: Sextants and Glue [was Sisteco Prismatic Compass]Fred Hebard20 Mar 2004, 17:174526w14630
Re: Sextant ComparisonsFred Hebard20 Mar 2004, 17:155053w14628
Re: Sextants and Glue [was Sisteco Prismatic Compass]Joel Jacobs20 Mar 2004, 16:534341w14626
Re: Sisteco Prismatic CompassCraig Scott20 Mar 2004, 15:238652w14624
Re: Sextants and Glue [was Sisteco Prismatic Compass]Jared Sherman20 Mar 2004, 15:183018w14622
Re: Sextants and Glue [was Sisteco Prismatic Compass]Fred Hebard20 Mar 2004, 13:563414w14620
Re: 1950 C. Plath, 1978 T Series TamayaJoel Jacobs20 Mar 2004, 12:304636w14618
Re: C+PRobert Eno20 Mar 2004, 05:094509w14616
Sextants and Glue [was Sisteco Prismatic Compass]Jared Sherman20 Mar 2004, 01:022744w14614
Re: C+P/Plath HistoryKieran Kelly19 Mar 2004, 23:264216w14612
Re: Sisteco Prismatic CompassDoug Royer19 Mar 2004, 22:443711w14610
CN in a Planetarium?Brooke Clarke19 Mar 2004, 22:212265w14608
Re: Sisteco Prismatic CompassFred Hebard19 Mar 2004, 22:023934w14606
Re: Sisteco Prismatic CompassJared Sherman19 Mar 2004, 18:173332w14604
Re: C+PZvi Doron19 Mar 2004, 18:102920w14602
Re: C+PDan Allen19 Mar 2004, 17:402547w14600
Re: Can't run Olivier's Java programsDan Allen19 Mar 2004, 17:372336w14598
Re: Sisteco Prismatic CompassKen James19 Mar 2004, 16:403735w14596
Re: Can't run Olivier's Java programsOlivier Le Diouris19 Mar 2004, 16:133739w14594
Re: Can't run Olivier's Java programsOlivier Le Diouris19 Mar 2004, 16:015490w14592
CN Study NotesJim Thompson19 Mar 2004, 15:472803w14590
C+P [was Re: Sisteco Prismatic Compass]Steven Wepster19 Mar 2004, 14:432472w14588
Re: Can't run Olivier's Java programsAubrey O´Callaghan19 Mar 2004, 14:134575w14586
Sisteco Prismatic CompassRobert Eno19 Mar 2004, 13:176977w14584
Re: Can't run Olivier's Java programsArthur Pearson19 Mar 2004, 13:143847w14582
Can't run Olivier's Java programsJim Thompson19 Mar 2004, 13:012885w14580
Re: Exorcizing the Evil Effects of Parallactic RetardationGeorge Huxtable19 Mar 2004, 07:396966w14578
Re: Celestial Navigation Software, new releaseArthur Pearson19 Mar 2004, 03:243336w14576
Re: Bygrave position line slide ruleZvi Doron18 Mar 2004, 22:143238w14574
Celestial Navigation Software, new releaseOlivier Le Diouris18 Mar 2004, 21:412664w14572
Re: Sisteco Primatic Handheld CompassJared Sherman18 Mar 2004, 06:412845w14570
Re: Sisteco Primatic Handheld CompassBrooke Clarke18 Mar 2004, 00:109794w14568
Re: Sisteco Primatic Handheld CompassGeorge Huxtable17 Mar 2004, 23:488725w14566
Re: Sisteco Primatic Handheld CompassJared Sherman17 Mar 2004, 16:412370w14564
Re: Sisteco Primatic Handheld CompassMyrt Webb17 Mar 2004, 16:272777w14562
Re: Sisteco Primatic Handheld CompassBrooke Clarke17 Mar 2004, 16:182274w14560
Re: Sisteco Primatic Handheld CompassKen James17 Mar 2004, 16:022757w14558
Re: Sisteco Primatic Handheld CompassKen James17 Mar 2004, 16:003396w14556
Re: Sisteco Primatic Handheld CompassPeter Smith17 Mar 2004, 14:592212w14554
Re: Sisteco Primatic Handheld CompassMike Boersma17 Mar 2004, 14:527455w14552
Re: Sisteco Primatic Handheld CompassPeter Ulph17 Mar 2004, 13:303838w14550
Sisteco Primatic Handheld CompassRobert Eno17 Mar 2004, 05:026354w14548
FW: "Sailing Alone Around the World"Doug Royer16 Mar 2004, 20:262258w14546
Re: "Sailing Alone Around the World"Ken James16 Mar 2004, 19:482395w14544
Re: Silicon Sea Leg 89Renee Mattie16 Mar 2004, 15:232308w14542
Silicon Sea Leg 89Dan Hogan16 Mar 2004, 14:281879w14540
Confused about Silicon Sea: Leg 89 ver. 1.2 part 3Renee Mattie16 Mar 2004, 03:102986w14538
"Sailing Alone Around the World"Doug Royer15 Mar 2004, 21:284690w14536
Nav-L FTP accessDan Hogan15 Mar 2004, 19:112031w14534
Silicon Sea: Leg 89 ver. 1.2Dan Hogan15 Mar 2004, 15:477222w14532
Exorcizing the Evil Effects of Parallactic RetardationFred Hebard14 Mar 2004, 15:16106456w14530
Some sites for ephemerides (Modified by Fred Hebard)Fred Hebard11 Mar 2004, 18:4710292w14528
Celestial Navigation Software releasedOlivier Le Diouris8 Mar 2004, 16:243416w14526
Silicon Sea INTRODan Hogan7 Mar 2004, 15:416414w14524
Re: TestEmilio Santos Junior7 Mar 2004, 03:052397w14522
Silicon Sea GlossaryDan Hogan6 Mar 2004, 18:174533w14520
Re: Refilling Mk IXA Bubble Sextant - Lessons LearntJared Sherman6 Mar 2004, 18:052666w14518
Re: Refilling Mk IXA Bubble Sextant - Lessons LearntHerbert Prinz6 Mar 2004, 15:412667w14516
Re: Refilling Mk IXA Bubble Sextant - Lessons LearntJared Sherman6 Mar 2004, 11:503252w14514
Refilling Mk IXA Bubble Sextant - Lessons LearntZvi Doron6 Mar 2004, 07:533917w14512
Re: Silicon Sea Leg 48 FixDan Hogan6 Mar 2004, 00:2550747w14510
Silicon Sea Leg 48 FixMike Burkes6 Mar 2004, 00:073464w14508
2 Volunteers for the Silicon Sea Working GroupDan Hogan5 Mar 2004, 18:452208w14506
Re: TestFuller D Michael5 Mar 2004, 16:392417w14504
Re: TestDan Hogan5 Mar 2004, 15:272147w14502
Re: TestMyrt Webb5 Mar 2004, 14:242223w14500
TestDan Hogan5 Mar 2004, 14:091838w14498
Re: TestHerbert Prinz4 Mar 2004, 21:462513w14496
Re: Worthwhile SiteCarl Herzog4 Mar 2004, 20:492315w14494
TESTDan Hogan4 Mar 2004, 18:241691w14492
Re: Worthwhile SiteGordon Talge4 Mar 2004, 16:522106w14490
BASNAV33 and other old freeware navigation softwareJim Thompson4 Mar 2004, 12:184288w14488
Worthwhile SiteJoel Jacobs4 Mar 2004, 09:362068w14486
Dip short of the Horizon (Was: Re: Silicon Beach)Renee Mattie3 Mar 2004, 21:582101w14484
Re: A noon sight conundrumGeorge Huxtable3 Mar 2004, 21:392454w14482
Re: Question about navigating......Nels Tomlinson3 Mar 2004, 19:454611w14480
Re: Question about navigating......Jared Sherman3 Mar 2004, 19:422762w14478
Re: Question about navigating......Herbert Prinz3 Mar 2004, 19:322840w14476
Re: Question about navigating......Dave Weilacher3 Mar 2004, 18:443175w14474
Question about navigating......Rene Schmidt3 Mar 2004, 18:182251w14472
Re: A noon sight conundrumWolfgang Köberer3 Mar 2004, 14:325681w14470
Aa-56 ephemeris routines from http://www.moshier.net/Michael Dorl2 Mar 2004, 03:274022w14468
GPS-based search siteSam Critchley1 Mar 2004, 22:463297w14466
GPS-based search siteSam Critchley1 Mar 2004, 22:422726w14464
Looking for sight data for Silicon BeachJim Thompson1 Mar 2004, 20:433039w14462
Re: Bygrave position line slide ruleWolfgang Köberer1 Mar 2004, 19:283556w14460
Signoff Navigation-LHolger Scholl1 Mar 2004, 10:371753w14458
Re: Bygrave position line slide ruleZvi Doron29 Feb 2004, 09:003797w14456
Re: Bygrave position line slide ruleDan Allen29 Feb 2004, 04:483603w14454
Magnetic Variation on landKieran Kelly29 Feb 2004, 04:124604w14452
Bygrave position line slide ruleZvi Doron28 Feb 2004, 16:012376w14450
R: Re: R: Refilling Mk IXA Bubble SextantGiuseppe Menga26 Feb 2004, 15:364537w14448
Re: R: Refilling Mk IXA Bubble SextantZvi Doron26 Feb 2004, 13:413724w14446
R: Refilling Mk IXA Bubble SextantGiuseppe Menga26 Feb 2004, 08:583653w14444
Refilling Mk IXA Bubble SextantZvi Doron25 Feb 2004, 22:532441w14442
Re: Traditional Polynesian 'location indicators'Peter Fogg25 Feb 2004, 09:329735w14440
Sorry GeorgeRenee Mattie24 Feb 2004, 21:162249w14438
Re: FW: Mag. VariationHerbert Prinz24 Feb 2004, 20:542740w14436
Re: FW: Mag. VariationGeorge Huxtable24 Feb 2004, 19:544651w14434
Re: Silicon Beach ProposalDoug Royer24 Feb 2004, 19:423642w14432
Re: Silicon Beach ProposalDoug Royer24 Feb 2004, 19:385093w14430
FW: Mag. VariationDoug Royer24 Feb 2004, 18:472567w14428
Re: Mag. VariationDan Hogan24 Feb 2004, 18:282225w14426
Re: Mag. VariationDoug Royer24 Feb 2004, 17:523171w14424
Re: Silicon Beach ProposalKen Gebhart24 Feb 2004, 04:003714w14422
Re: Silicon Beach ProposalBruce Stark24 Feb 2004, 00:282905w14420
Re: Mag. VariationDoug Royer23 Feb 2004, 23:512878w14418
Re: Mag. VariationGeorge Huxtable23 Feb 2004, 23:464167w14416
Re: Mag. VariationKieran Kelly23 Feb 2004, 21:572958w14414
Re: Traditional Polynesian 'location indicators'D Winchurch23 Feb 2004, 21:322607w14412
Re: Mag. VariationZorbec Legras23 Feb 2004, 21:232891w14410
Re: Mag. VariationBrooke Clarke23 Feb 2004, 19:042464w14408
Mag. VariationDoug Royer23 Feb 2004, 18:232050w14406
Re: Traditional Polynesian 'location indicators'George Huxtable23 Feb 2004, 17:386265w14404
Re: Traditional Polynesian 'location indicators'Philip Ouvry23 Feb 2004, 09:022027w14402
Re: Silicon Beach ProposalJim Thompson23 Feb 2004, 02:107746w14400
Re: Traditional Polynesian 'location indicators'Dan Hogan23 Feb 2004, 00:422190w14398
Re: Traditional Polynesian 'location indicators'Rodney Myrvaagnes23 Feb 2004, 00:362893w14396
Re: DR, AP, and tables (was: Silicon Beach)Peter Fogg22 Feb 2004, 23:522973w14394
Re: DR, AP, and tables (was: Silicon Beach)George Huxtable22 Feb 2004, 23:342810w14392
Re: Traditional Polynesian 'location indicators'Peter Fogg22 Feb 2004, 23:255371w14390
Re: Traditional Polynesian 'location indicators'Craig Parsons22 Feb 2004, 21:153323w14388
Re: DR, AP, and tables (was: Silicon Beach)Gary Harkins22 Feb 2004, 18:264285w14386
DR, AP, and tables (was: Silicon Beach)Renee Mattie22 Feb 2004, 18:142619w14384
Horizon: where the trees meet the water.Renee Mattie22 Feb 2004, 17:232852w14382
Silicon Beach ProposalGary Harkins22 Feb 2004, 16:516593w14380
Re: Traditional Polynesian 'location indicators'George Huxtable22 Feb 2004, 11:143879w14378
Traditional Polynesian 'location indicators'Peter Fogg22 Feb 2004, 09:405609w14376
Re: Traditional Polynesian 'location indicators'Trevor Kenchington22 Feb 2004, 08:582878w14374
Re: Silicon Beach ProposalRodney Myrvaagnes22 Feb 2004, 05:312688w14372
Re: Silicon Beach ProposalJim Thompson22 Feb 2004, 04:533028w14370
Re: Silicon Beach ProposalRenee Mattie22 Feb 2004, 01:362503w14368
Silicon Beach ProposalJim Thompson21 Feb 2004, 14:594128w14366
Re: Assumed positions and plotsJim Thompson21 Feb 2004, 01:503752w14364
Re: Assumed positions and plotsDoug Royer21 Feb 2004, 00:494555w14362
Assumed positions and plotsDoug Royer20 Feb 2004, 18:583157w14360
Re: Cannot dispense with the assumed position at seaJim Thompson20 Feb 2004, 15:513233w14358
Re: Cannot dispense with the assumed position at seaJim Thompson20 Feb 2004, 15:514755w14356
Re: Cannot dispense with the assumed position at seaJim Thompson20 Feb 2004, 15:515431w14354
Re: Cannot dispense with the assumed position at seaFred Hebard20 Feb 2004, 14:557050w14352
Re: Cannot dispense with the assumed position at seaFred Hebard20 Feb 2004, 14:436531w14350
Re: Cannot dispense with the assumed position at seaJoel Jacobs20 Feb 2004, 14:256071w14348
Re: Cannot dispense with the assumed position at seaBill Noyce20 Feb 2004, 13:574569w14346
Re: Cannot dispense with the assumed position at seaJim Thompson20 Feb 2004, 13:025101w14344
Re: Cannot dispense with the assumed position at seaJim Thompson20 Feb 2004, 02:363198w14342
Re: Cannot dispense with the assumed position at seaDoug Royer19 Feb 2004, 23:332952w14340
Re: Cannot dispense with the assumed position at seaDoug Royer19 Feb 2004, 23:152738w14338
Re: Cannot dispense with the assumed position at seaDoug Royer19 Feb 2004, 22:542507w14336
Re: Cannot dispense with the assumed position at seaDave Weilacher19 Feb 2004, 22:045755w14334
Re: Cannot dispense with the assumed position at seaJoel Jacobs19 Feb 2004, 21:444607w14332
Re: Cannot dispense with the assumed position at seaDoug Royer19 Feb 2004, 21:213421w14330
Re: Cannot dispense with the assumed position at seaDoug Royer19 Feb 2004, 20:403411w14328
Re: Cannot dispense with the assumed position at seaDoug Royer19 Feb 2004, 20:183213w14326
Re: Mag. Var. in Australia??Doug Royer19 Feb 2004, 19:312549w14324
Re: Azimuth compass?Doug Royer19 Feb 2004, 19:1112467w14322
Re: Azimuth compass?William Allen19 Feb 2004, 19:1124634w14320
Azimuth compass?Jim Thompson19 Feb 2004, 18:3610569w14318
Re: Ocean swells for directionFred Hebard19 Feb 2004, 13:454841w14316
Re: Ocean swells for directionPeter Fogg19 Feb 2004, 10:574157w14314
Re: Magnetic Variation - Lewis and ClarkGeorge Huxtable19 Feb 2004, 10:294773w14312
Re: Aluminium SextantKieran Kelly19 Feb 2004, 09:104423w14310
Re: Position lines.George Huxtable19 Feb 2004, 00:484165w14308
Re: Magnetic Variation - Lewis and ClarkGeorge Huxtable19 Feb 2004, 00:179771w14306
Cannot dispense with the assumed position at seaGary Harkins19 Feb 2004, 00:004958w14304
Mag. Var. in Australia??Doug Royer18 Feb 2004, 19:292325w14302
Cannot dispense with the assumed position at seaJim Thompson18 Feb 2004, 17:194142w14300
Re: Ocean swells for directionGerard Mittelstaedt18 Feb 2004, 04:564766w14298
Re: Eclipses of Jupiter's moons: Did ships tend to carry therequisite equipment?Fred Hebard17 Feb 2004, 21:482526w14296
Re: Ocean swells for directionDoug17 Feb 2004, 21:362505w14294
Re: Eclipses of Jupiter's moons: Did ships tend to carry therequisite equipment?George Huxtable17 Feb 2004, 21:353831w14292
Position Lines: was; Problems with AstronavPCGeorge Huxtable17 Feb 2004, 21:354137w14290
Re: R: Problems with AstronavPCGeorge Huxtable17 Feb 2004, 21:355625w14288