NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: which would you choose?
From: Rodney Myrvaagnes
Date: 1999 Aug 05, 1:27 AM
From: Rodney Myrvaagnes
Date: 1999 Aug 05, 1:27 AM
Better than a dart on a world map, yes. If you can take sights well enough to do that, you are on a much larger boat than will be worrying about the price of 4 or 5 extra GPS receivers. We peons with 2-digit boat lengths don't get such steady conditions. Don't get me wrong. I like my sextant (at least the nice one. . . ). It stays on the boat. My wife and I both use it for fun, and to keep our skills, such as they are. But, to go offshore without redundant GPS these days is just silly. Going offshore without a sextant is a reasonable thing to do. On Thu, 5 Aug 1999 11:44:02 +1000, John K Simmonds wrote: >Not quite true, you can get a fairly good LOP with only a guess as to >the time (AM or PM and the date) if your prepared to spend the time and >given a moon sight and at least one star. Accuracy dependent on how good >your shot's are, but better than a dart :^) > >Rodney Myrvaagnes wrote: >> >> Perhaps John's answer is straight because it >> oversimplifies. The sextant wo'nt be much help without a >> chronometer. If you are choosing to do without electronics, >> a mechanical chronometer good enough for navigation will >> cost the price of several GPS receivers. >> > Rodney Myrvaagnes J36 Gjo/a Associate Editor Electronic Products 20+ years without a Car, a TV, or a website