
NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: which would you choose?
From: Richard B. Emerson
Date: 1999 Aug 05, 6:45 AM
From: Richard B. Emerson
Date: 1999 Aug 05, 6:45 AM
This thread is becoming, to my mind, a little too dogmatic. Keep in mind that, at the end of the day, the goal is to know where you are with some certainty. If the budget is unlimited, buy all the toys you can. If the budget is limited, buy while remembering that Murphy's Law will not be denied. The more pieces in the system, the greater then chance for failure. Now, mercifully, shear numbers alone don't define risk of failure; there are millions and millions of transistors in a single CPU chip, for example, but they hold up amazingly well. This list springs from an interest in the details of navigation and that's hard to follow if all of a ship's positional data is presented by a receiver and computer. But when the seas are up, the clouds thick, and the navigator is spending time chumming the fish, it's hard to find time for computing navigational triangles from first principles. Conversely, when the batteries fail, a drop to the deck shatters a chip, and none of the displays tell anything, a sextant, clock, and tables look mighty attractive. As always, it's best to use the right tools for the job and the definition of "best" varies with the circumstances. Rick S/V One With The Wind, Baba 35