Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: star-to-star distances
    From: Jan Kalivoda
    Date: 2004 Sep 30, 23:33 +0200

    Bill Noyce wrote:
    
    > This is called "annual aberration" or "aberration of starlight"
    
    > Historical note -- this effect was first discovered by astronomers
    > who were trying to measure parallax of stars (using the earth's orbit
    > as a baseline) to determine how far away they are.  It turns out that
    > parallax is (almost always?) a much smaller effect.
    >
    ========
    
    In all cases. The annual ellipse of the apparent (= observed) star position 
    around the true position (becoming the circle in the poles of the ecliptic 
    and the straight line on the ecliptic) due the annual aberration has the 
    major axis of some 20" of SHA, while even the greatest annual star parallax 
    (still Proxima Centauri, if I hadn't missed anything) lies below 1".
    
    Another important factor for obtaining the apparent (= observed, almanac) star 
    positions is the nutation, caused by perturbations by the Moon, which rocks 
    the position of Earth's axis around its mean position that is in turn 
    steadily shifted by the precession (cca 50" of SHA in a year). The nutation 
    has several components, the largest one amounts to cca 17" of SHA and 9" of 
    the declination with the period of 19 years (other nutation components have 
    much smaller amplitudes and periods).
    
    
    All can be summed up this way:
    
    Mean celestial body's position for some epoch, obtained by celestial mechanics 
    for planets/Moon/Sun=Earth or tabulated in astronomical catalogues for stars 
    + its own intermediate motion + intermediate precession = the mean position 
    for the actual date
    
    Mean position for the actual date + nutation = true position for the actual date
    
    True position + annual aberration + the correction for the finite light speed 
    for planets/Moon/Sun + annual parallax for stars  = apparent geocentric 
    position (tabulated in the Nautical Almanac)
    
    Apparent geocentric position + daily parallax (+ daily aberration, max 0.3") = 
    apparent topocentric position
    
    Apparent topocentric position + refraction + instrument errors = measured position
    
    
    Jan Kalivoda
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site