NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: sight reduction tables
From: Peter Fogg
Date: 2007 Sep 30, 10:16 +1000
From: Peter Fogg
Date: 2007 Sep 30, 10:16 +1000
George proposes:
I suspect that the issues are not so simply comparable, George. One of the problems with plastic sextants is their unreliability, rather than lack of precision.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
And yet there's a bit of a contradiction here, it seems to me, in the
attitude of many small-boat navigators; those who prize their expensive
sextants, reading to 0.1 arc-minutes, and wouldn't be seen dead using a
plastic sextant, no matter how good it may happen to be. I raise this matter
at the risk of reopening old wounds here, but it would seem to me that if
HO249 is acceptably accurate, then so too would be a decent plastic sextant.
I'm not arguing against Gary here; I simply don't know whether he is a
member of the diehard posh-sextant brigade or not. But they exist, and for
them, would the 1-minute precision of HO249 be considered good enough?
I suspect that the issues are not so simply comparable, George. One of the problems with plastic sextants is their unreliability, rather than lack of precision.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---