Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: sight reduction tables
    From: Peter Fogg
    Date: 2007 Sep 30, 10:16 +1000
    George proposes:

    And yet there's a bit of a contradiction here, it seems to me, in the
    attitude of many small-boat navigators; those who prize their expensive
    sextants, reading to 0.1 arc-minutes, and wouldn't be seen dead using a
    plastic sextant, no matter how good it may happen to be. I raise this matter
    at the risk of reopening old wounds here, but it would seem to me that if
    HO249 is acceptably accurate, then so too would be a decent plastic sextant.
    I'm not arguing against Gary here; I simply don't know whether he is a
    member of the diehard posh-sextant brigade or not. But they exist, and for
    them, would the 1-minute precision of HO249 be considered good enough?

    I suspect that the issues are not so simply comparable, George. One of the problems with plastic sextants is their unreliability, rather than lack of precision.

    To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, send email to NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site