Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: sight reduction tables
    From: George Huxtable
    Date: 2007 Sep 30, 00:54 +0100

    It was quite a pleasure to read posting [NavList 3296] by Gary LaPook, in
    favour of the HO249 tables. Well-informed, and well-argued, it was highly
    convincing. As I have stated before, I've no experience of using either
    HO229 or HO249, so have no intention of taking sides in any such debate.
    Indeed, I have argued over several years, on this list and others, that
    navigating by altitude sights from a small craft, in anything but the
    calmest weather, is an inaccurate business, with likely errors of a few
    arc-minutes. So I fully agree that for such a purpose, there's no need for
    sight reduction tables to be precise to 0.1 arc-minutes, and the precision
    of HO249, to no better than a whole minute, is entirely appropriate. I
    hasten to add that for observations taken from a big ship, or from on land,
    the higher precision of other tables might well be useful.
    And yet there's a bit of a contradiction here, it seems to me, in the
    attitude of many small-boat navigators; those who prize their expensive
    sextants, reading to 0.1 arc-minutes, and wouldn't be seen dead using a
    plastic sextant, no matter how good it may happen to be. I raise this matter
    at the risk of reopening old wounds here, but it would seem to me that if
    HO249 is acceptably accurate, then so too would be a decent plastic sextant.
    I'm not arguing against Gary here; I simply don't know whether he is a
    member of the diehard posh-sextant brigade or not. But they exist, and for
    them, would the 1-minute precision of HO249 be considered good enough?
    I would agree, however, that for those who wish to measure lunar distances,
    for which high precision is necessary, and (because no horizon is involved)
    possible, there's really no alternative to a metal sextant of the highest
    contact George Huxtable at george---.u-net.com
    or at +44 1865 820222 (from UK, 01865 820222)
    or at 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK.
    To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, send email to NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site