NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
From: Andrés Ruiz
Date: 2010 Nov 17, 09:49 +0100
Dear Paul,
A good didactical explanation of the
method.
This remember me my end of career project
where to solve the kinematics and dynamics of a complex mechanism, each
component contribute with his own equation F, and the solution, like in the FEM
method, is obtained from a set of n equations like:
∆F = ∂F/∂t ∆t + ∂F/∂B ∆B + ∂F/∂L ∆L
In your example F is the altitude or
the lunar distance.
A generalization could be used if n
observations are obtained, using the method of least squares.
At the university I used this method
in heat transfer, in deformation and stress calculations for a structure, in thermodynamics,
… And I have use it only once in my job when I worked in robotics, for
calculate a space manipulator. For hobby and passion: navigation, I have used
this method (1)(2) in my program CelestialFix.exe solving for latitude B,
longitude L, course R and speed V.
Severance (3) was the first who
published a solution using this method in “Overdetermined celestial fix by
iteration“, and Kaplan (4) generalize it for use in the STELLA program.
Regards,
(1)
http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=112117&y=201003
(2)
Position
and motion from celestial observations
(3)
http://www.ion.org/search/view_abstract.cfm?jp=j&idno=298
(4)
http://www.usno.navy.mil/USNO/astronomical-applications/publications/sel-tech-rep
---
Andrés Ruiz
Navigational Algorithms