NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: refraction
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2007 Jan 4, 22:52 -0500
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2007 Jan 4, 22:52 -0500
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Guy Schwartz wrote: > How were the refraction adjustments > initially calculated for the atmosphere? > What was the methodology used? > I don't think it was as easy as the stick in the > water method? The principle is easy. Positions of stars (and motion of Sun) were known since long ago. With higher and higher precision gradually. Taking their apparent altitudes and comparing with computed altitudes you can find refraction. I don't know precise historical details, but I am sure that Ptolemy was well aware of refraction. The theory explaining refraction is of much later origin probably of XVII century. Once you derive a formula on a theoretical basis, you need only few precise observations to determine numerical coefficients in this formula and to test the theory. The modern tables are computed using this formula. (I compared the formula with the Almanac, it matches:-) I wanted to finish this message with the words "But I do not know the precise history of events" but then I typed on Google: atmospheric refraction history and the first site which popped up was: http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?id=85182 with the paper Atmospheric refraction: a history by Waldemar H. Lehn and Siebren van der Werf. The full text is downloadable in PDF (for me) but I am not sure that it is downloadable for everyone. If not, tell me and I will e-mail you the paper. Rare luck! Usually Google returns 175,000,000 sites with total irrelevant junk when I search:-) Alex. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---