NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: On polar nav
From: Robert Eno
Date: 2002 Sep 23, 18:48 -0400
From: Robert Eno
Date: 2002 Sep 23, 18:48 -0400
Mr. Huxtable, You give me far more credit than I deserve. My "expertise" in this obscure area is merely the result of lots of practice and hard-won experience. For example, there are a lot of people out there who can tell you how much error would be imparted into a sight if the artificial horizon is off-kilter by 2 seconds of arc. I cannot do that. I can only offer my two bits' worth on the practical side of things. You have brought up a good point regarding the practice of reversing the spirit levels end for end as a means of ensuring that the levels themselves have not been deranged during travel. Yes, this is a standard practice although it does not have to be done all of the time unless you believe that your equipment has suffered some grievous indignity. I have had my own equipment for about 15 years and as yet, have not found the levels to be off kilter. The adjusting screws on the spirit levels are held firmly in place with a set screw and with a little common sense and care for your equipment, they should stay intact indefinitely Leaving the spirit levels on the artificial horizon is an interesting idea, however, because of the small size of the artificial horizon, the spirit levels end up blocking the view, thus they must be removed. A friend of mine has a huge artificial horizon (I don't know who manufactured it, I can ask him and get back to the list) that will allow one to leave the levels in place whilst taking observations. I generally replace the levels after a round of sights just to double check that everything is still ok. More often than not, I find that they will almost never be perfectly level but will be off by a "hair". For practical purposes, this "hair" can be ignored. Keep in mind, that practical navigation, especially in a polar environment is an inexact science. Even if you do get things set up exactly so, there are still problems with wacky refraction errors, ice fog and all kinds of wonky things that the navigator will never encounter in the more temperate and tropical zones of the earth. As for a base, yes, it is vital that the base be a solid surface. Concrete or rock is best, but a snow or ice block, in conjunction with the box which contains the artificial horizon will do the trick. Several years ago, I submitted a piece to the Navigation Foundation's "Navigator's Newsletter" (Issue 33, Fall 1991) on celestial navigation in the polar regions. I have not read it for years but I did cover some of this stuff. Also, there are some excellent articles by some REAL authorities on artificial horizons. These guys know more about artificial horizons than I will ever know. I suggest that you try to get a hold of some of the back issue of the Navigator's Newsletter. It is an excellent source of information. Cheers ----- Original Message ----- From: George HuxtableTo: Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 2:53 AM Subject: Re: On polar nav > What a privilege it is to have on this list expertise such as Robert Eno's > to call on. > > Thanks, Robert, for a well-argued (and completely convincing) comparison > between the relative merits of a theodolite and a sextant with artificial > horizon, for a polar explorer. > > Further questions arise. > > Is it part of the levelling procedure for a glass artificial horizon to > reverse the spirit levels, end-for-end, on the glass plate, in case the > levels themselves have become somehow deranged in the knockabout of arctic > travel? > > Presumably, whatever the glass horizon is mounted on must be VERY rigid and > firm, to ensure that when the (slight) weight of the spirit levels is added > and then removed, its horizontality is affected by no more than a fraction > of a minute. Is that rigity easy to achieve? Any such difficulty might be > overcome, perhaps, by leaving the levels in place while an altitude is > taken, if room can be found between the levels on the glass surface for a > Sun reflection to be seen, but I have doubts whether this would be > possible. > > George Huxtable.