NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: On polar nav
From: Peter Fogg
Date: 2002 Sep 12, 12:55 +1000
From: Peter Fogg
Date: 2002 Sep 12, 12:55 +1000
Good on you, Robert, you're a mine of information. But if the theodolite tripod can be detached from the rest then the instrument part is similar to a sextant (?) but would seem much more useful - no worries about a horizon or auxillary equipment to replace same, and the instrument could be left standing for the 24 hour period under discussion; just swung around, kept level with its bubble-levels? The tripod is not much more cumbersome than a rifle, for example, which no self-respecting explorer would be seen without. Which led to another thought - how do you check for index error without a horizon? What a terrible thing, to talk about being dead wrong about Scott. Robert Eno wrote: > I can answer the last question: > > Theodolites are heavy instruments to lug around on a trip to the pole. But > most importantly, ever try to use one at -30 C? It ain't fun, believe me. A > sextant is much easier and simpler, to work with under extreme conditions > and compared to a theodolite, a little more robust. > > I think, but am not entirely certain, that Scott took a theodolite with him. > I could be dead wrong though. > > cheers, > > Robert Eno >