Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Is most probable position (MPP) a dangerous misnomer?
    From: Frank Reed
    Date: 2019 Feb 5, 12:06 -0800

    Dave, you wrote:
    "One little gem which will delight you I’m sure is Anderson’s ‘Is the Gaussian Distribution Normal?’"

    The idea that common measurements ("normal" measurements) are not "normally distributed" (pulled from a Gaussian distribution) is well-known. It's introductory statistics. Folks rediscover this periodically and think they've discovered something quite profound. There are other distributions that one can use. But how can we generate simulated data that broadly resembles real navigational data with its relatively high prevalence of outliers?

    There is a relatively easy way to model the higher prevalence of outliers in sextant observations and other sorts of navigation measurements which allows us to use many of the mathematical properties of Gaussian distributions. We imagine our numbers as being pulled from two bins (both assumed to have mean value equal to zero). One bin, call it bin A, has a relatively "normal" standard deviation, call it s0 (for altitude sights in celestial navigation, s0 might be 0.5 minutes of arc). The other bin, bin B, has a higher standard deviation, call it s1. And s1 might be, in a typical real-world modelling case, three times larger than s0. Number are drawn from bin A some large fraction of the time, e.g. 80% of instances, and drawn from bin B the rest of the time. Of course the numbers aren't labeled with the bin that they came from so all you get in the end is a bunch of numbers with some statistical properties. Those numbers will have a net standard deviation somewhat greater than s0, but the key property is that they, collectively, will not correspond to a Gaussian distribution because there will be more "outliers". The "tails" of the distribution are thicker, more heavily-populated. A statistical measure of this is known by the rather ugly, jargon-y term "kurtosity". 

    So if you're simulating observations, don't use a simpleGaussian. Use a pair of Gaussians, as above. This is a nice, easily-implemented technique for generating model data for navigation simulations, and it can help find cases where the "normal" math might lead you astray.

    Frank Reed

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site