NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
On measuring the distance
From: Bruce Stark
Date: 2002 Mar 22, 14:17 EST
From: Bruce Stark
Date: 2002 Mar 22, 14:17 EST
Didn't get back to the computer as soon as expected! Far and away the most critical aspect of lunars is the observer's skill in measuring the distance. George has pointed out that a phenomena he's discovered and given the name "Parallactic retardation" makes the measurement twice as critical if the moon is near the meridian. That came as an unpleasant shock, but it reinforces the importance of developing good sextant technique. One thing I noticed about Chuck's measurements of the distance is that he got and recorded them in short order. That's the way it should be. Agonizing over the perfection of each contact only wears you out. Another thing I noticed is that, although the distance is increasing, his measurement of it gets shorter each time. And I believe it is getting better each time. My own experience is that it often takes one or two contacts to warm up. Perhaps for his next lunars he'll take only one altitude of each body before and after the distances and use the time saved to get more distance contacts. Maybe five or six, and throw the first one or two away. My own eyesight is poor, and when I bring the sextant up again the last contact still looks OK. So I always give the knob a little twist one way or the other so as to have to make a new adjustment. That way, five or six contacts usually gets GMT within two minutes. Bruce