NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: On lunar distances
From: Steven Wepster
Date: 2002 Feb 6, 16:12 +0100
From: Steven Wepster
Date: 2002 Feb 6, 16:12 +0100
Dov wrote: >It is said that the great triumph of 19th century science (really begun >by Newton) was showing that the world was governed by linear equations, >and the great triumph of 20th century science was proving that it wasn't >;-) It's no wonder that Newton didn't like the problem of lunar >distances, as there is no neat analytic linear equation that you can >solve to get the answer.... My comment: I think that Newton _did_ like the lunar distances; at least, he saw this _and_ the timekeeper method as the most likely and promising routes to solving the longitude problem. What made his head ache was the theory of the moon's motion. Eventually Newton produced a lunar theory that had geometrical (not analytical) origins and that was probably based on an earlier theory by Jeremiah Horrocks. In Newton's time the solving of differential equations was in its infancy and generaaly I think it is not fair or sensible to suggest that Newton's work is in the spirit of the 19th century. Steven ----------------------------------------------------------- Steven Wepster wepster@math.uu.nl tel +31 30 253 1186 Mathematisch Instituut Universiteit Utrecht PO Box 80.010 3508 TA Utrecht The Netherlands ===========================================================