Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: longitude positive west?
    From: Marcel Tschudin
    Date: 2008 Jun 12, 08:27 +0300

    George, you are not the only one noticing those different conventions
    in using coordinates.
    
    > George Huxtable wrote:
    >  > Additionally (and this is a separate matter) Andres' program appears to
    >  > treat all longitudes as Easterly, so that a Westerly longitude is
    > shown as
    >  > negative. To me, this seems somewhat perverse, though I am aware that
    > many
    >  > programs (particularly for astronomy) do so. We navigators work in hour
    >  > angles (GHA and LHA) for our positions of bodies in the sky, and
    > those hour
    >  > angles are always measured Westwards, so that they always increase with
    >  > time. An hour angle is nothing else but the longitude of the body,
    > measured
    >  > Westerly from Greenwich, 0 to 360. Why don't we measure our geographical
    >  > longitudes exactly the same way, so that we simply difference the
    > longitudes
    >  > to get local hour angle? Meeus is an astronomer who sets us a sensible
    >  > example. It seems madness to measure hour-angles as positive
    > Westwards, and
    >  > longitudes as positive Eastwards. Can anyone really justify it?
    
    On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Paul Hirose  wrote:
    > I'll try. First off, "positive west" is odd enough nowadays that Meeus
    > felt obliged to defend it in a sidebar. Admitting it was contrary to the
    > IAU convention, he growled, "We shall *not* follow this IAU resolution."
    > (Astronomical Algorithms, 1991)
    >
    > And if you want to do things the Meeus way, note that he measures
    > azimuth from the south!
    
    Yes, Meeus, and still also other textbooks (at least those which I
    used when setting up my own program for calculating astronomical
    positions) use longitude Westerly and Azimuth from South. This made me
    believe that it would correspond to a particular astronomical
    convention. I was surprised when being told later that azimuth South
    would not be an astronomical but rather a surveyor's convention.
    Paul's comment "is odd enough nowadays" indicates that the astronomers
    apparently dropped some time ago their hour angle oriented convention
    in order to replace it against the "normal" geographer's(?)
    convention.
    
    Marcel
    
    --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
    Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
    To post, email NavList@fer3.com
    To , email NavList-@fer3.com
    -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site