NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: On the integration of location and data
From: Greg R_
Date: 2009 Nov 2, 23:19 -0800
From: Greg R_
Date: 2009 Nov 2, 23:19 -0800
Peter Foggwrote: > Isn't it via reference to the location of the > place you want to get to, and the track between > them? What Peter said... Once the vehicle starts moving the GPS (at least all of the ones that I've ever used) knows both where it is and its current direction/speed - from that it's easy enough to figure out how to get to the next waypoint. -- GregR --- On Mon, 11/2/09, Peter Fogg wrote: > From: Peter Fogg > Subject: [NavList 10402] Re: On the integration of location and data > To: navlist@fer3.com > Date: Monday, November 2, 2009, 9:45 PM > > > > Lu wrote: > > > While a "traditional" GPS doesn't necessarily > have or need a built-in > compass, if one thinks about it for a moment one realizes > that > > automotive navigational systems DO need a built-in compass. > � Else if > you punch in an address while parked, how would they know > whether or not > to make the first instruction "make a U-turn?" > > > Isn't it via reference to the location of the > place you want to get to, and the track between > them? > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ NavList message boards: www.fer3.com/arc Or post by email to: NavList@fer3.com To , email NavList+@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---