Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: The flat earth notion
    From: Walter Guinon
    Date: 2003 Nov 8, 12:37 -0800

    Sounds a lot like Zeno's paradox to me.
    
    
    --- "Trevor J. Kenchington"  wrote:
    > George,
    >
    > I know better than to question your knowledge of the mathematics of
    > navigation. I also strongly suspect that, if I asked for proof that a
    > loxodrome reaches (rather than approaches) a pole, you would need to
    > resort to mathematics that would not easily be represented in e-mail
    > format and which I would not understand if you did send it. Hence, I
    > have little option but to accept what you say at face value -- something
    > that I am never comfortable doing, even when you are the author of
    > whatever I am accepting.
    >
    > Could you, perhaps, explain the final approach of a loxodrome to the
    > pole, without resorting to math? Above a latitude of, say, 89 degrees 50
    > minutes, the sphericity of the Earth ought to be negligible and we
    > should be able to visualize the problem as one of a rhumb line
    > spiralling around the pole in a simple 2-dimensional space, while
    > cutting each meridian at the same angle. I can visualize that spiral
    > closing in from 10 miles out to a mile and so to a tenth of a mile. But
    > it then seems to me that we could simply expand the scale by 100 times
    > and see the loxodrome spiralling in from 1/10 of a mile to 1/1000,
    > before expanding the scale again and repeating. What I don't see is how
    > that loxodrome will eventually make the final step of reducing its
    > distance from the pole to zero.
    >
    > You wrote:
    >
    > > They are both wrong, and Herbert is correct; though I'm sure he is capable
    > > of defending his corner without my aid.
    > >
    > > The presumption is that you are steering a rhumb-line course, with a
    > > Northerly component, and that all the Polar ice has melted.
    > >
    > > As you spiral in toward the pole on a rhumb-line course, you travel a
    > > FINITE distance to get there. If you can maintain a constant speed, then
    > > that can be done in a finite time. The snag is, you have to travel in
    > > ever-decreasing circles, as the size of the spiral shrinks. To get exactly
    > > to the pole, you have to make an infinite number of such gyrations, so the
    > > vessel has to be spinning at an infinite rate. This is rather an unphysical
    > > state of affairs, to say the least: a "singularity".
    >
    >
    > Maybe it is my limited understanding of math but I don't think that the
    > finite length of a loxodrome is inconsistent with it never reaching the
    > pole. The mathematics of infinity has some funny properties, analogous
    > to the effects of dividing by zero, and I'd not rule out a curve of
    > finite length which spirals without end. (There may well be members of
    > this list who can say that I am wrong. I'm only saying that I can't rule
    > that out myself.)
    >
    > > The pole will be reached at a predictable moment, at which the ship will be
    > > spinning round at infinite speed. Just after that moment, it will escape
    > > from the pole, still spinning with infinite speed, and the radius of the
    > > spiral then increases, and the spinning slows, until the vessel reaches its
    > > original latitude. What will its longitude be then?
    >
    >
    > While I am willing to accept that I may be wrong and a loxodrome may
    > actually reach the pole, it will take a whole lot more to persuade me
    > that said loxodrome ever departs from the pole again. George: I really
    > think you are wrong on that point.
    >
    > I _know_ you are wrong on the claim that our hypothetical ship will ever
    > leave the pole. You have assumed that the vessel is following a
    > rhumb-line course between 270 and 090. Any course away from the North
    > Pole must be 180 instantaneously and, immediately thereafter, must be
    > between 090 and 270. That is: the hypothetical ship can only leave the
    > pole by changing its course (perhaps to its reciprocal) and that is
    > contrary to the starting assumption.
    >
    > > Of all the unrealistic questions we have considered on this list, this is
    > > perhaps the most unrealistic of all. But why should we let that deter us
    > > from playing such games?
    > >
    > > The picture above, of a vessel spinning infinitely fast at the pole,
    > > applies to all incoming courses except 0deg and 90 deg, as Trevor points
    > > out. At 90deg, the pole is never reached at all: the vessel sticks to the
    > > equator.
    >
    >
    > No. That is commonly stated in textbooks but is clearly false.
    > Regardless of its starting latitude, a vessel following a rhumb-line of
    > 090 or 270 will never reach either pole. It will follow a parallel of
    > latitude, which could be the Equator but could be any other. (This is as
    > stated in my last contribution to this thread.)
    >
    > > At 0deg, the vessel approaches the pole along a certain line of
    > > longitude, then emerges along a line of longitude 180deg different.
    >
    >
    > Again, the vessel cannot leave the North Pole while its course remains
    > the rhumb line of 000. As I wrote last time, it can only leave by
    > changing to a reciprocal course -- which it would of course do if it
    > continued "straight" (meaning on a Great Circle, since this is spherical
    > geometry) through the pole. We are, however, assuming rhumb-line
    > courses, not reversible rhumb-line courses.
    >
    >
    > Trevor Kenchington
    >
    >
    > --
    > Trevor J. Kenchington PhD                         Gadus{at}iStar.ca
    > Gadus Associates,                                 Office(902) 889-9250
    > R.R.#1, Musquodoboit Harbour,                     Fax   (902) 889-9251
    > Nova Scotia  B0J 2L0, CANADA                      Home  (902) 889-3555
    >
    >                      Science Serving the Fisheries
    >                       http://home.istar.ca/~gadus
    
    
    __________________________________
    Do you Yahoo!?
    Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
    http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site