NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: first sextant sights
From: Bill B
Date: 2006 May 3, 14:52 -0500
Alex wrote
> Speaking of the actual MEASUREMENT accuracy,
> I still don't know whether anyone can take
> Lunar or star distances under ideal conditions
> and be most of the time within 0'.2 of the true
> distance.
> I suspect that the more realistic number is about 0'.5 or 0'.6
> Myself, I find it hard to achieve even this.
Are you speaking of individual observations, or the average of several
observations? If I recall your averages are usually pretty close to true.
Bill
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
From: Bill B
Date: 2006 May 3, 14:52 -0500
Alex wrote
> Speaking of the actual MEASUREMENT accuracy,
> I still don't know whether anyone can take
> Lunar or star distances under ideal conditions
> and be most of the time within 0'.2 of the true
> distance.
> I suspect that the more realistic number is about 0'.5 or 0'.6
> Myself, I find it hard to achieve even this.
Are you speaking of individual observations, or the average of several
observations? If I recall your averages are usually pretty close to true.
Bill
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
