Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc.
    From: Frank Reed CT
    Date: 2006 Jan 11, 01:01 EST

    George H, you wrote:
    "That's a perfectly  valid way to assess refraction, but not a particularly
    new one."
    
    Oh, of  course. Let's be clear -- all of this was worked out a very long time
    ago.  Terrestrial refraction was a serious practical problem for terrestrial
    survey  work and many people probably wrote about it (I've never looked into
    it), and to  that extent, there is nothing new under the Sun! But it's
    certainly new to this  list as far as I am aware.
    
    Just about one year ago, there was a rather  long discussion where people
    were trying to puzzle out the origin of the  equation underlying Bowditch's Table
    XV. It didn't interest me at the time, but  it does now. No one seemed to
    know how to derive it last year or, more  importantly, assess its limitations.
    What I am saying is that this simple  technique of changing the curvature of the
    Earth can be used to analyze not just  Table XV [see my reply to Bill] but
    everything else where terrestrial refraction  impacts navigation. For example,
    consider "anomalous dip". The primary source of  dip anomalies (though not the
    only source) is the variation in the scale height  in the layer of the
    atmophere close to the ocean which in turn changes the  effective curvature of the
    Earth. If I calculate dip based on a lapse rate of  -6.5 deg per kilometer
    (implying a scale height of about 10km), I find that the  dip at 5 meters height of
    eye is 3.9 minutes of arc. If instead the lapse rate  is -34.1 deg/km, the
    atmosphere has constant density and the dip is exactly  equal to the geometric
    value which 4.3 minutes of arc. And if the lapse rate is  +25deg/km, then the
    dip at 5 meters if 3.4 minutes of arc. Naturally a  calculation like this
    assumes that the lapse rate is constant and the atmosphere  is more or less the
    same on the whole path from horizon to observer (so it can't  handle really
    exotic refraction, like mirages).
    
    There's also a conceptual  aspect to this. Next time you're looking at a
    distant ocean scene with a few  boats off in the distance, perhaps a lighthouse,
    and beyond the horizon some low  hills of an island, ask yourself how the scene
    would change if the Earth's  curvature were a little greater or a little
    less. That's exactly what you would  see under conditions of variable refraction.
    A temperature inversion would lift  the distant hills just as if the Earth was
    nearly flat. Note that this sort of  analysis does not apply to distant
    objects that are higher than a few hundred  meters (so no mountains) and it has the
    same limitations that I mentioned above,  but it covers a very large portion
    of the possible variation in  refraction.
    
    Finally, the practical value of this is not that we can start  calculating
    dip and all the rest based on the specific temperature profile  since, of
    course, we don't usually have access to the temperature profile.  Instead it
    provides a means of assessing possible errors arising from using the  tables
    "naively", and it leaves open the option of calculating different  versions of the
    tables when circumstances might require  them.
    
    -FER
    42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N  72.1W.
    www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site