Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: The development of bubble sextants
    From: Hanno Ix
    Date: 2009 Aug 14, 16:40 -0700
    Brad, George:

    First, I am sorry I have confused you:

    My previous topic was the measurement of LON by the time differences of transits of Sun and Moon at the local meridian. Here I interjected myself into an entirely different discussion: the dynamic of spirit levels. While both are ultimately aimed at determining position they are aimed at the same time at quite different issues within this field.

    To the pendulum comparison:

    Often one can choose from several models to describe a system. I chose a pendulum because its the best comparison I personally know of. Let me describe other systems but quite similar to the spirit level. You will  see the similarities immediately. And you will, I hope, agree, that the pendulum analogy is valid.




    Assume a rail that is bent to a circular arch and has a groove at the inside of the arch so that a tiny ball can roll in that groove along the arch. The rail is mounted on a table such that it rests with its deepest point on that table. You set the ball into the rail and give it a tiny push. Of course, the ball will roll back an forth on the arch, slightly diminishing the amplitude of the cycles until it comes to rest at the center.

    If you can neglect the energy of the rotation in that ball, I assure you, it will move just parallel to a pendulum with the same length as the radius of above arch and if started at the same time and with the same elongation. In reality, after several periods their movements might actually get out of sync, mostly because of different friction in both systems.

    The only difference is that the trajectory is enforced by an circular arch in one system, and by a thread of the length of the arch's radius on the other. A first order analysis yields the period  as equal to 2*pi*sqrt(r/g) for both cases. ( r ist the radius of above arch/length of the thread, and g is the constant of gravitation). Please note: The period is independent of the mass of the "lens", and no hint of the type of

    You construct a third system: You tie a helium balloon to a string of the same length as we used above. Because helium is lighter than air this time the "lens" of this "pendulum" will swing above the suspension point. Nevertheless, the period will be close to the above. Friction again will cause the difference we might see in actuality.

    Again a new sytem, our last: You build an circular arch from a hollow tube and fill it with  liquid, say with spirit. However you leave some space, so that a bubble is created. Since the bubble is lighter than the medium of its environment it will act just like the above ballon.

    All four systems have in common a circular trajectory, an equilibrium point and a restoring force nearly proportional to the instantanous ( ~sinus of ) elongation. They will also have  friction, or damping, somewhat proportional to the instantous speed. That is the reason they behave so similarly.

    Because of this simularity I can also use the more general analogy of a low pass filter in all the mentioned cases, particularly to the spirit level. I hope to draw from it insights of how to improve the stability if the bubble.

    I also hope I have demonstrated to you the validity of the analogy between spirit level and pendulum.

    Best regards








    --- On Fri, 8/14/09, Brad Morris <bmorris@tactronics.com> wrote:

    From: Brad Morris <bmorris@tactronics.com>
    Subject: [NavList 9515] Re: The development of bubble sextants
    To: "NavList@fer3.com" <NavList@fer3.com>
    Date: Friday, August 14, 2009, 1:48 PM


    The patent originally referred to by Hanno requires that the optical device be pendulously
    suspended in the tube, such that vertical is maintained. How would he know if the device he constructed
    was then plumb? This may be the reason why Hanno is now looking at spirit levels.

    If the device were to be constructed by Hanno, it would need be checked by reference to some
    other well understood device.  Hanno will not prove that his device is plumb by reference to
    a spirit level.  That would required somehow referencing the spirit level (horizontal) to the
    optical axis (vertical), a difficult task without highly accurate metal machining.  I believe
    that Hanno suggested wood, an in-appropriate material for constructing this type of device.

    The NavList has recommended that Hanno obtain a theodolite, which would be the standard method
    of taking these meridian crossing measurements.  Once calibrated and certain, then Hanno can
    compare those measurements to his device measurements and determine statistical variation.
    Naturally, there will be much work in just establishing the practice of the method with
    the standard device, let alone the construction and calibration of the new device to the old.

    And by the way, a pendulum takes advantage of the acceleration of gravity, where the spirit
    level takes advantage of the buoyancy of the bubble, with the viscosity of the fluid providing
    dampening.  A spirit level is NOT a pendulum turned upside down.


    Best Regards
    Brad


    "Confidentiality and Privilege Notice
    The information transmitted by this electronic mail (and any attachments) is being sent by or on behalf of Tactronics; it is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee named above and may constitute information that is privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the addressee or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to same, you are not authorized to retain, read, copy or disseminate this electronic mail (or any attachments) or any part thereof. If you have received this electronic mail (and any attachments) in error, please call us immediately and send written confirmation that same has been deleted from your system. Thank you."




    --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
    NavList message boards: www.fer3.com/arc
    Or post by email to: NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, email NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com
    -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site