Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: course, heading, track
    From: Trevor Kenchington
    Date: 2002 Feb 7, 09:04 -0400

    Paul Hirose wrote:
    
    > I think you were incorrect to contradict John LeRoy. His message was
    > obviously in the context of flying. Aviators (at least in the U.S.)
    > don't use the Bowditch meaning for some of those navigational words.
    
    Perhaps you are right and if so, I owe John an apology.
    
    I don't claim any knowledge of the navigation terminology of aviators.
    However, if John was seeking to draw a distinction between that and
    Bowditch-like terminology, his intention was not clear to me. [He wrote
    "course was never path through the air, for instance" in response to
    Nigel Gardner's "Course was path through the air or water" -- the "for
    instance" implying, to me, that John was suggesting that the course is
    not the path through either fluid medium. (Much more dissection of
    wording and this thread will be even further lost in the intricacies of
    English grammar than it is in those of navigational terms!]
    
    
    > In aviation, "course" means the intended direction of flight over the
    > ground.
    
    > A heading is always a direction measured with respect
    > to the longitudinal axis of the airplane, or in other words, the
    > direction in which the airplane is pointed
    
    > "TRACK - The actual flight path of an aircraft over the surface of the
    > earth."
    
    So, if I understand that correctly, U.S. aviation terminology does not
    distinguish between what we surface-bound types call "heading" and
    "course". Are aircraft so stable in yaw that the distinction is not needed?
    
    Then "course" is used in the air for what would be "track" on the water,
    while the aviator's "track" approximates to the surface navigator's
    "course made good" -- though the latter is viewed as a straight line
    from point to point, whereas the aviator's "track" appears from the
    above definition to include whatever random movements about that line
    the aircraft makes (small for a high-flying jet but presumably not for a
    low-powered light aircraft at low altitude).
    
    It must be tough for Navy aviators, navigating their aircraft by one
    terminology while their floating runways move about following a
    different one!
    
    
    Trevor Kenchington
    
    
    --
    Trevor J. Kenchington PhD                         Gadus{at}iStar.ca
    Gadus Associates,                                 Office(902) 889-9250
    R.R.#1, Musquodoboit Harbour,                     Fax   (902) 889-9251
    Nova Scotia  B0J 2L0, CANADA                      Home  (902) 889-3555
    
                        Science Serving the Fisheries
                         http://home.istar.ca/~gadus
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site