NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: The circumnavigator's paradox. was: Benetnasch and Alkaid revisited
From: Ken Muldrew
Date: 2005 Apr 7, 10:46 -0600
From: Ken Muldrew
Date: 2005 Apr 7, 10:46 -0600
On 6 Apr 2005 at 16:27, Bill wrote: > George Huxtable wrote: > > But I'm a bit puzzled when Bill writes- > > > >> Around 1377 Oresme wrote his Traiti? du ciel et du monde, a French > >> translation and commentary of Aristotle's De caelo et mundo, in which he > >> again discussed the circumnavigator's paradox. > > > > Is he saying here that it was originally Aristotle, before Oresme, who > > had posed and resolved the circumnavigator's paradox? I had a scan of a translation of Aristotle's "On the Heavens" last night and found nothing that even suggested the circumnavigator's paradox. The commentary by Oresme in his "Traiti? du ciel et du monde" is probably full of ideas that are much more interesting than Aristotle. There is a wealth of information on the web about Oresme discussing his proposal that the earth rotates rather than the heavens revolving (200 years before Copernicus). After presenting a nice argument in favor of the idea he eventually drops it because it would contradict holy scripture (but with a warning that one has to be vigilant against such clever arguments). He also used a graph to plot velocity versus time under constant acceleration, predating Vieta and Galileo by centuries in showing the way to analytic geometry. A very interesting character. Ken Muldrew.