Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: chronometer dials: 12 or 24 hours?
    From: Frank Reed
    Date: 2009 Jan 19, 20:13 -0800

    George, you wrote:
    "A mathematician is what he was, but that denigration might be compared with
    what Wikipedia has to say about Chauvenet, as follows-
    "In 1841 he was appointed a professor of mathematics in the United States
    Navy, and for a while served on Mississippi. A year later, he was appointed
    to the chair of mathematics at the naval asylum in Philadelphia,
    Pennsylvania. He was instrumental in the founding of the United States Naval
    Academy at Annapolis, Maryland."
    I've little doubt that his navigational experience on "Mississippi" far
    exceeded mine, or Frank's."
    
    The impression you may have gotten is that he was a naval officer in the 
    normal sense of the word --that he sailed the seas and shot lots of sights 
    with his sextant. Chauvenet was not the ship's navigator or even one of the 
    officers. The steamship Mississippi was the newest ship in the fleet, one of 
    the first steamers in the US Navy, launched at the very end of 1841. The 
    Mississippi was employed in trials and training during 1842 rarely (ever?) 
    out of sight of land. Chauvenet was a TEACHER aboard USS Mississippi with the 
    title/rank of "professor of mathematics" (in an era when 'professor' was 
    synonymous with 'instructor'). This was at a time when there was no Naval 
    Academy, so they experimented with, what we might call, on-the-job training. 
    For about a decade starting in the late 1830s, the US Navy had about a dozen 
    "professors of mathematics" aboard ships at sea. The experiment failed. 
    Chauvenet was so disgusted with trying to teach under such circumstances that 
    he resigned his post after just a few months. 
    
    A few years later, Chauvenet was indeed an important contributor to the 
    founding of the US Naval Academy and out of great respect for his theoretical 
    knowledge, he was appointed as a professor there. Chauvenet was an all-around 
    scholar, a mathematician, a really brilliant guy. There are few better 
    sources even today for some of the mathematical and theoretical underpinnings 
    of celestial navigation than Chauvenet's books. But he was not a practical 
    man or a man with direct experience of practical matters in navigation.
    
    And:
    "Here, Frank is making invalid assumptions, in thinking about a small craft
    with one single "navigator", and in temperate climates, who observes a noon
    Sun each day."
    
    Even large vessels in the 19th century often had a single navigator or at most 
    a couple of them, working together closely. The evidence is in the logbooks. 
    My assumptions were not "invalid".
    
    And:
    "He might otherwise imagine himself as a second officer of a vessel in Winter
    in high latitudes, working watch-and-watch. He has been dragged out of his
    pit to go on watch for four hours, in pitch darkness and overcast weather.
    With short daily sunlight, his previous watch might well have been the same.
    In rough conditions, he hardly knows which way is up, to start with, never
    mind what Greenwich Time it happens to be. "
    
    It's not as if your poor second officer is utterly lost at sea. He knows his 
    longitude. That knowledge is always imperfect, but even if you haven't seen 
    the Sun for a week, and even if you're half asleep, you know your longitude 
    within a few degrees. So if my DR longitude is 45 degrees west (+/-3 degrees) 
    and it's 6 in the morning aboard ship, then of course the Greenwich Time is 
    right around 9 in the morning. Then you make the change for the almanac's 
    "astronomical time". They KNEW how to do this. It was a standard calculation, 
    but different from today in terms of practical procedure. A modern navigator 
    who shoots the Noon Sun knows that he needs to get the Sun's declination 
    correct so he looks at his "chronometer" and with that GMT, to the nearest 
    few minutes, he enters the Nautical Almanac and finds the correct 
    declination. But in the 19th century (and well into the 20th), the DR 
    longitude was converted to time and *that* was used to get the approximate 
    Greenwich Time and enter the almanac for the correct declination (for Noon 
    Sun).
    
    Of course, there is still some logic in the idea of a chronometer with a 
    24-hour dial, but it was apparently not sufficient to sell them in practice, 
    at least not in overwhelming numbers. But as I said previously, and as you've 
    noted, too, keeping track of the day could be a real problem. Maybe they 
    should have made chronometers that showed the day of the week...
    
    -FER
    
    
    
    --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
    Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
    To post, email NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, email NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com
    -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site