Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: On checking accuracy
    From: Bill Morris
    Date: 2008 Aug 10, 13:08 -0700

    Peter Fogg wrote
    "All sights are not
    created equally.  Some are better than others.  The good ones tend to
    be
    closest to that slope."
    
    Would it not be truer to say that the good ones tend to have a 
    closest to that slope?
    
    And he wrote
    "Such irony. The closed mind that has decided in advance just what is
    permissible, in this case the reduction of random error, and anything
    else
    must be wrong.  We might as well be back in the Dark Ages. "
    
    I have been following the arguments closely. I perfectly understand
    the point Peter is making but have doubts that it is a valid one. I
    haven't reached a conclusion and await further enlightenment, perhaps
    from a professor of applied statistics, i.e. in my ignorance I make an
    appeal to authority. It is curious how in such intense discussions
    phrases such as "closed mind" crop up. I think an open mind is good,
    but try to take care that mine is not so open that my brains drop out.
    
    And Bill B. wrote
    "He should be severally chastised for saying "line" instead of "line
    > segment."
    
    Ouch! Do the end points lie on the horizon?
    
    On Aug 10, 11:05�pm, Bill  wrote:
    > Bill the engineer wrote:
    > > There is an infinity of
    > > possible lines of that slope
    >
    > Peter responded:
    >
    > > Yes. �But only one of them is correct. �Its that correct one we are working
    > > towards. �Having the right slope to begin with tends to be quite useful,
    > > instead of deriving an incorrect one.
    >
    > > and the line that best uses the
    > > data(since we have no information about which are "best")
    >
    > My initial impression was that Bill the engineer was suggesting different
    > slopes and different placements. �Reading carefully, he stated "There is an
    > infinity of possible lines OF THAT SLOPE." �He does not, I think, argue with
    > the concept of fitting to the actual slope, but rather questions, as I did,
    > how to make the agonizing decision of where (horizontally and vertically) I
    > should place the slope in relationship to the plotted points.
    >
    > He should be severally chastised for saying "line" instead of "line
    > segment." 
    >
    > But let's hear from him before we raise our back hair.
    >
    > Bill B. �
    --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
    Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
    To post, email NavList@fer3.com
    To , email NavList-@fer3.com
    -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site