Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: The "big" sextant manufactures
    From: John Karl
    Date: 2007 Oct 28, 09:28 -0700

    One of my Plaths is a Navistar "look alike".  I say "look alike"
    because it doesn't say Navistar on it, but only C. Plath, Hamburg,
    Germany, S/N 49066.  But someone, who should know, says it is an early
    Navistar, and is identical to later ones that do say Navistar.  I
    wonder if any List members can date it from its S/N?  I put it at
    about 1968.
      It came from a sailing cat wrecked on a reef, without a certificate
    or box; it had a cracked horizon shade, corroded mirror frames, broken
    lighting system, and scrappy paint.  I fixed it all up - now it's in
    like-new condition.  I've not bothered to calibrate the arc (I'd use
    star-star distances) because (1) my eyes aren't good enough to be
    effective, and (2) I just wanted it in my collection for the kind of
    comparisons we've been talking about.  My other "Navistar Plath" is a
    M. Low Navy Mark III, in excellent condition.  I've been told that it
    is a Navistar made by Plath.
    When I said that the Plath looked like junk, I was basing it on the
    view through its scope.  I believe Plath is no different than all the
    other manufacturers in this regard.  They make a fine mechanical
    instrument, then put a cheap and poor performing Galilean scope on it
    - the kind you find on a kid's toy.  These Galilean scopes don't
    compare to a prism scope in terms of FOV, whole-horizon effect, and
    extraneous light.  I don't know why manufacturers don't offer low-
    power prism scopes - tradition?
    I have no reason to think that the craftsmanship of the Plath is
    anything but excellent,  However, as I've said before, I've never
    heard of a guaranteed accuracy, even when using the published arc
    corrections.  And what about a design that has troublesome one-wire
    lighting, grounded via lubricated surfaces; has ineffective lighting
    of the micrometer drum; and has the shades blocking the view?
    So my heresy, blasphemy, and Anti-Christian thoughts are not against
    Plath craftsmanship, but against some easily-corrected design flaws,
    and use of Galilean scopes (both common to most all modern sextants).
    If ye thinkest this still maketh me the blackest of sinners, I confess
    and pray to the CN Gods to save me from the plague of incorrect 60'
    carry-overs to degrees; being off one column or row in sight reduction
    tables; pressing the wrong calculator button in the first decimal
    place; and bumping the sextant against the companionway when going for
    a beer,
    To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, send email to NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site