Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: A basic sight reduction question
    From: Bill B
    Date: 2012 Apr 04, 16:23 -0400

    On 4/4/2012 2:39 PM, slk1000@aol.com wrote:
    > but I'm more concerned about what to tell students about reducing a
    > sight using a typical paper form.
    
    Students? Don't mention it unless there is a hand waving wildly in the
    air with that question.  If they are using a tabular method they have a
    lot more to be concerned with. For you, knowing the v or d is 30 seconds
    past the minute makes it easy to mentally interpolate using the next
    minute's table for big v's like the moon.
    
    In the bigger picture this concern is just noise given the accuracy of
    the system. But if that is getting you crazy, let me push you over the edge.
    
    If you go to the explanation pages in the almanac, it will tell you
    possible error size in GHA, d and v values in the daily tables, and
    their probabilities.
    
    The Sun does have a v, but that is accounted for in the GHA of the daily
    pages. For fun, note the GHA of the Sun then compare that to the GHA 48
    or 96 hours later.  Is the difference 0? Or scroll down the Sun's d
    column when it is, for example, 0!2.  0!2 between most hours, but
    suddenly a 0!1 sneaks in!
    
    Now consider the IC of your sextant. What is the margin of error there?
    Or the accuracy along the arc of 0!2 -1!3. (That instrument error can be
    measured and an adjustment table produced.)
    
    Finally Ho, the raw sextant observation.  People average, do linear
    regressions, or fit to a the actual Hc line because of random errors
    there. Students on land--in real life often on the pitching deck of a ship.
    
    If your students are using 229, then their tabular AP may be a good
    distance from actual, resulting in 10-40 mile intercepts. In that case
    they have to adjust for the fact their LOP is actually a Circle of Position.
    
    And that's for one body.  Do that 2 or 3 times for other bodies,
    advancing LOP's for estimated course and speed and you have your cocked
    hat. Quite a while ago a long thread was to devoted to the mathematics
    of the cocked hat.  Are we in it, near it, and the probabilities of the
    above.
    
    Lay that out for your students in the first session and see how many
    return ;-)
    
    Bill B
    
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site