NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: aircraft drift; over wate.r Re: Amelia Earhart's aerial navigation
From: Clive Sutherland
Date: 2009 Nov 19, 22:39 -0000
From: Clive Sutherland
Date: 2009 Nov 19, 22:39 -0000
George; In my experience although it is a long time ago now there are two methods that can be used. The first is as you say. If the wind is strong enough, the drift meter can be aligned to match the direction of movement of the wave tops while the pilot keeps a constant heading. The scale of the drift graticule is calibrated w.r.t. the axis of the aircraft The drift angle can be found to an accuracy of about 1 or 2 degrees. White horses have a lifetime of about 10 to 30 secs and if the altitude is about 1000 ft enough of them will be seen in the field of view to do this quite easily and several observations can be averaged. The second is for the pilot to fly a pre-defined triangular course with careful rated 120deg turns and with equal legs (about a mile long.) If there were no wind the aircraft would return over its start position. The exercise would start with the navigator dropping a Smoke float at the start of the run and the run timed to the finish when the aircraft crosses the smoke trail again after two 120 deg turns. The difference between the start and finish positions would be the drift during the time of the run. The direction was found by flying downwind or upwind, in the direction of the smoke trail. ** -----Original Message----- ** From: George Huxtable [mailto:george@hux.me.uk] ** Sent: 19 November 2009 19:36 ** To: navlist@fer3.com ** Subject: aircraft drift; over wate.r Re: [NavList 10758] Re: Amelia ** Earhart's aerial navigation ** ** ** As one quite ignorant about air navigation, a few questions come to my ** mind. ** ** I can see the relevance of some sort of drift angle meter when flying ** over ** land, in establishing ground track direction from relative motion of ** landmarks seen passing below. ** ** But how does that work over the sea? Presumably, one would be seeing ** whitecaps on the waves, or white-horses, that will tend to drift ** downwind, ** as the wave-tops move downwind. Is that speed of motion quite negligible, ** compared with the airspeed of a light aircraft? Is there some way of ** allowing for that motion? Or does this just add an additional uncertainty ** to ** the estimated track-angle of the aircraft? If so, what level of ** uncertainty ** would that be? ** ** George. ** ** contact George Huxtable, at george@hux.me.uk ** or at +44 1865 820222 (from UK, 01865 820222) ** or at 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK. ** ** -- ** NavList message boards: www.fer3.com/arc ** Or post by email to: NavList@fer3.com ** To , email NavList+@fer3.com ** ** No virus found in this incoming message. ** Checked by AVG - www.avg.com ** Version: 8.5.425 / Virus Database: 270.14.73/2512 - Release Date: ** 11/18/09 19:41:00 -- NavList message boards: www.fer3.com/arc Or post by email to: NavList@fer3.com To , email NavList+@fer3.com