Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: accuracy of Cook's lunars
    From: Henry Halboth
    Date: 2013 Jan 7, 21:24 -0500
    An  interesting bit of trivia:

    Averaging Bligh's Longitude with that of Cook's first, as noted by Bligh, you get 149-29.275, or thereabouts.

    Henry

    On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Alexandre E Eremenko <eremenko---.edu> wrote:

    Let me add that the longitude of Point Venus
    (Cooks observatory has a memorial sign) which I determined from
    Terraserver is 149d 29'6.

    Alex.

    On Mon, 7 Jan 2013, Henry Halboth wrote:


    It's rather refreshing to see the subject of Lunars again being discussed.
    For those who may be interested, I post, without comment, the following
    excerpt from Captain (later Admiral) Bligh's narrative concerning his
    second voyage to Tahiti, as first published in 1792.

    "The result of the mean of 50 sets of lunar observations taken by me on
    shore, gives for the Longitude of Point Venus                 210 33 57 E
    Captain Cook, in 1769, places it in    210 27 30
    In 1777, his last voyage                    210 22 28"

    Regards,

    Henry

    On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Frank Reed <FrankReed---com>wrote:

    Hanno Ix, you wrote:
    "I wonder if the ephemeris especially of the moon as used by Cook can
    still be studied today. Naturally, Cooks errors cannot have been any
    smaller than the ones of those."

    Even better. Although we can certainly study the tables (Mayer) that were
    used to generate the early Nautical Almanacs, we may as well jump straight
    to the product itself. Very nearly all Nautical Almanac editions from the
    first in 1767 through the early 20th century are available in full on
    Google Books. To compare these with correct values (as nearly as can be
    determined given some continuing small uncertainties in delta-T for that
    era), we need lunar distance tables given, preferably in degrees, minutes,
    and seconds, as was normal back then, and we need those tables for the
    rather unusual argument of GAT, Greenwich Apparent Time, which was standard
    before the switch to GMT which came in 1834 (and was considered seriously
    late by commentators at the time). Back in 2004 I made available online
    software which does just that. I am attaching an image of a portion of the
    tables for Sun-Moon lunar distances from August 1767 compared against data
    from my online app for the same dates, lined up to match the tabular format
    of the old Nautical Almanac. As you can see, there are cases where the
    difference is as large as 50 seconds of arc, but there are others where the
    difference is only 1 second of arc. For an "average" lunar this will add an
    uncertainty equivalent to an error of something like 0.25' in the distance.
    Whatever the observational error may be, this error would sometimes
    increase it and other times cancel it out. On average two sources of error
    add as the square root of the sum of the squares, so if they had, let's
    say, 0.25' error from observations, then the net error would be
    sqrt(2)*0.25 or about 0.35' (equivalent to 42 seconds in time or 10' in
    longitude). By 1805 the errors in the lunar distance tables had been
    significantly reduced. By 1875, they were nearly perfect for navigational
    use (though lunars were essentially obsolete at sea by that date, there
    were still a handful of practitioners, and there were definitely lunarians
    on land, exploring and mapping Africa, for example).

    -FER


    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
    Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
    ----------------------------------------------------------------



    View and reply to this message: http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=121755







       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site