Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Zodiacal coordinates
    From: Robert H. van Gent
    Date: 2012 Sep 14, 14:16 +0000

    Hi,
    
    I am new to this list but perhaps I can help.
    
    The site you have visited is an astrological website and the celestial 
    positions are given according to astrological conventions.
    
    The first number is indeed the degree, followed by the zodiacal sign (Aries 
    starts at 0, Taurus at 30, Gemini at 60, etc.) and then the number of 
    arcminutes and arcseconds. The positions are ecliptical and appear to be 
    tropical.
    
    The R found at the end of some longitudes indicates that the planet's motion 
    is retrograde (astrologers find this very important).
    
    I hope that this helps.
    
    Rob van Gent
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: NavList@fer3.com [mailto:NavList@fer3.com] On Behalf Of John H
    Sent: 14 September 2012 15:40
    To: Gent, R.H. van (Rob)
    Subject: [NavList] Zodiacal coordinates
    
    I was hoping someone could help me decipher reports in ephemerides of
    celestial positions.   I know how to cope with right ascension and
    declination.
    
    Where I get stuck is in the report of "longitude" and "latitude".    I'm
    using the site:
    
    http://www.ephemeris.com/ephemeris.php
    
    A typical entry is shown below.
    
    I'm assuming from inspection that "longitude" and "latitude" are based on
    an ecliptic/zodiacal coordinate system.   It seems, again from inspection,
    that the zero of latitude is taken as the the ecliptic.   What I don't
    understand is the notation for longitude.   There is a leading number,
    which I don't understand, followed by a zodiacal sign and then a number in
    minutes and seconds.   I'm assuming that the leading notation is some
    number of degrees, but I'm unsure.
    
    If this is the case, I see that all the numbers are positive - that indicates 
    some 'handedness' to the notation - that the zero starts at some
    boundary of a zodiacal sign, but then, what determines the convention?   Is
    it tropical or sidereal?  Since one only sees the classical zodiac in these 
    tables, I'm assuming that it doesn't correspond to the IAU convention.
    
    Clearly there must be a convention somewhere for reporting these, but I just 
    can't seem to put my hands on it.
    
    If someone has any pointers as to where to look, I'd be most grateful.
    
    
    Planet     Longitude Latitude    RA Decl
    
    Venus                 24 Lib 37'25"           0�27'23"          13:31:54
         - 9�06'59"
    
    
    John H.
    
    
    
    
    View and reply to this message: http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=120580
    
    
    
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site