Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Yogurt Sky: Navigational Stars
    From: Frank Reed
    Date: 2019 Jun 26, 16:33 -0700

    Robin Stuart, you wrote:
    "The dip of the horizon is 90° – 10.70°/2 = 84.65°."

    Yes. dip = 90° - SD or, of course, SD = 90° - dip. It's an odd way of thinking about it since we don't normally imagine a semi-diameter for the Earth when we're standing on it. But when we climb from the surface to deep space, it's much more plain that the dip and SD are complementary. 

    BTW, I'm not entirely convinced on the angular diameter of the Earth in the image. It's an odd projection of the stars onto the flat view plane. But of course it's fairly close to the value you measured, no matter what.

    When I first looked at this image (as I was watching the episode), I immediately recognized the star clouds in the Sagittarius Milky Way. Then I spotted the "claw" of Aquila, which I have long used for star-hopping to that gorgeous star cluster, M11. Then I spotted Altair and even the little constellation Sagitta above it. At that point I went looking for my favorite unofficial constellation (something that I think of either as the Oryx or the Broken Lyre) which includes two nearby stars, 70 Ophiuchi and Barnard's Star. But it's missing in the scene... Aha. It must be behind the Earth! 

    One of the nice reasons for knowing this unofficial constellation, the Oryx, part of which was briefly in a well-publicized semi-official constellation called the "Bull of Poniatowski", is that it sits right above the celestial equator at 18 hours right ascension (0° Dec, 90° SHA). And if that spot is directly behind the Earth in this scene, then directly above the Earth (and behind "us" as the "camera's viewpoint" must be the celestial equator at 6 hours RA --very close to Orion's Belt. In other words, if we could turn around 180° in that imaginary but realistically drawn scene, we would see Orion. That makes the Sidereal Time 6 hours, more or less, for an observer directly beneath us. That observer would see Orion and "us" right at their zenith. 

    • The declination of the zenith is the observer's latitude
    • The right ascension of the zenith is the observer's local sidereal time

    I've been meaning to write something about the uses and amusing apperances of the Oryx (or Broken Lyre) for years... I'm using this as an opportunity to get that rolling. It's easy to see this little pattern around midnight local time this week right on the meridian.

    Finally, I think there are two other navigational stars present in the image (besides Altair and Rasalhague). It looks like Antares is displayed in the far lower right. Hard to be sure because of the low range in brightnesses/diameters used to display the stars. And Sabik should be between the Earth and Antares, but that hardly counts as a navigational star.

    Frank Reed

    File:


    File:


    File:


    File:


    File:


    File:


       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site