Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Working a lunar. was: lunar distance in Wikipedia
    From: Peter Hakel
    Date: 2009 Jul 24, 16:14 -0700
    Using the procedure described in John Karl's book, I get 3:21:10, which is in a nice agreement with Antoine's and Frank's results.

    Peter Hakel

    From: "frankreed@HistoricalAtlas.com" <frankreed@HistoricalAtlas.com>
    To: NavList@fer3.com
    Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 11:11:14 PM
    Subject: [NavList 9205] Re: Working a lunar. was: lunar distance in Wikipedia

    For the Moon-Mars lunar observation example which you quoted, the calculator on my web site gives a best time of 03:21:08.5 compared to yours of 03:21:09.4. That difference is completely insignificant so your result is excellent.

    If you would like to run some more examples and test them againt my online lunars calculator (which has been well "battle-tested" over the past five years), go here: http://www.historicalatlas.com/lunars/ and click on "Clear a Lunar Online".

    PS: I apologize that your message was slightly scrambled (various characters replaced by "?"). This is a bug which I believe will be fixed in a few days when some new software goes live.

    NavList message boards: www.fer3.com/arc
    Or post by email to: NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, email NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)