Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Working a lunar
    From: George Huxtable
    Date: 2009 Aug 6, 08:14 +0100

    contact George Huxtable, at  george@hux.me.uk
    or at +44 1865 820222 (from UK, 01865 820222)
    or at 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK.
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: "Hanno Ix" 
    Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 6:57 AM
    Subject: [NavList 9382] Re: Working a lunar
    I am a novice to CelNav, and I certainly have no experience in lunars.
    Some algorithm occurred to me, though, that I would like to share and 
    discuss. However, given the age of this business, if it is a valid one I 
    doubt it is new. If anyone has seen it before, please let me know, so I 
    could read up on it. The objective is to find GMT and location.
    Let's make a Gedanken experiment:
    A ship reaches land of unknown coordinates. Land makes it practical for the 
    navigator to measure the meridian passages of Heavenly Bodies rather 
    reliably. Given GMT, he can calculate LAT and LONG. (One shot method.)
     But now we pose GMT as unknown. Sitting on land, measure the meridian 
    passages of, say, sun and moon which moves. Can I find GMT, too, using the 
    now available data not using the classical moon distance methods?
    If I see things right, there must be a LOP which connects all locations on 
    Earth with a given, fixed difference DT between the meridian passages of sun 
    and moon.
    However, along this LOP, the same DT occurs at a different GMT. In this 
    scenario, the LOP referring to a given DT is pre - calculated, listed in an 
    almanac and annotated with GMT at each LAT. So, by having found the LAT 
    before we just read the GMT of the DT-specific LOP.
    There is another opportunity:
    By accepting preliminarily this GMT, we can calculate LAT again, namely from 
    the meridian passage of the MOON, and compare both values found. If there is 
    a gross difference we must have made an error. This, by itself, would be of 
    value. Otherwise, though, we have good reasons to accept the GMT we found.
    I appologize if I am talking about a method I have not gone through myself 
    yet! I fear there is a hick-up in this somewhere. But I would like to hear 
    the critique of you specialist navigators before I spend alot of time trying 
    to do something long known as wrong.
    If, however, you find it sound, and has not done before I will pusue it.
    Best regards
    --- On Sun, 8/2/09, Paul Hirose  wrote:
    From: Paul Hirose 
    Subject: [NavList 9301] Re: Working a lunar
    To: NavList@fer3.com
    Date: Sunday, August 2, 2009, 3:13 PM
    Antoine wrote:
    > So, my results would not be that bad ...
    Your results are only 1 second different from my program.
    But it recommends the upper limb of the Moon, because the light is
    coming from almost directly above (position angle = 350�). Of course, if
    the "observation" was calculated, this doesn't matter. Even if it was
    really observed, I don't think there is much error because the Moon is
    nearly full (phase angle = 4�), and the cleared lunar distance is not
    very sensitive to altitude.
    My corrected time is 2001-04-08 at 03:21:10.5 UT1 (03:22:14.5
    Terrestrial Time). Position fix from the altitude observations is
    N44�50.48' W011�01.08'.
    I checked the solution by entering the Terrestrial Time, latitude, and
    longitude W11�17'07.2" into the USNO MICA 2.0 program. Longitude equals
    my solution, moved west by delta T (64 seconds) converted to arc (= 64 *
    15 * 1.002738 arc seconds). With these inputs, the outputs from MICA
    should match the observations. (MICA does not compute refraction, so I
    used my program's values.)
    31.4506 Moon altitude
    - .2718 semidiameter
    + .0263 refraction
    31.2051 lower limb (calculated)
    31.2050 lower limb (observed)
    17.7536 Mars center
    + .0497 refraction
    17.8033 refracted center (calculated)
    17.8033 refracted center (observed)
    64.9266 refracted separation angle
    + .2718 Moon semidiameter
    65.1984 lunar distance (calculated)
    65.1983 lunar distance (observed)
    The check is good.
    I filter out messages with attachments or HTML.
    NavList message boards: www.fer3.com/arc
    Or post by email to: NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, email NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site