Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: What happened to the leap second?
    From: David C
    Date: 2017 Jan 1, 13:26 -0800

    On page 254, paragraph 2 of the Nautical Almanac, it specifies that the volume is based on UT1.  UT1 is based on the rotation of the earth...and hence has a second of variable length.  UTC runs on a second of fixed length, which is slightly shorter than the second of UT1.  At intervals, UTC gets ahead of earth time, and a leap second is inserted to bring it back in sync.

    Yesterday, UTC was 0.5 seconds ahead of earth time - which introduced a 0.5 second error in your celestial calculations.  Today, UTC is 0.5 seconds behind earth time (UT1).  So you still have an error = 0.5 seconds in your fix...except the error goes in the opposite direction now.  At some point in the future, since the UTC clock runs fast compared to the earth clock, they will cross over each other, and your fixes will gain in accuracy.

    In the Explanations at the back end of the Nautical Almanac, they explain

    The time argument on the daily pages is 12 hr + Greenwich Hour Angle of the mean sun a.k.a GMT, and here denoted UT.  This differs from the broadcast time UTC by an amount which, if ignored, introduces an error of up to 0.2' in longitude.  

    They go on to say leap seconds are introduced so that UTC and "UT" are always within 0.9 seconds of each other.  If the leap second was not introduced, you would have to adjust the time read from your watch (i.e. add 1 second) before using it as an entry in the NA.

    I am struggling to get my head around this. From the quotes above I deduce:

    UT1 variable length second

    UTC fixed length second

    UTC second slightly less than UT1 second

    UTC is human time

    Leap second inserted to sync UTC with UT1 (UT)     (and thus syncs human time with the NA)

    UT (as in Almanac) =  UT1 = GMT

    NA based on UT1

    In addition I conclude:

    UT1 vs UTC   Variations in the rotation of the earth.

    GMT vs GAT  Variations in the orbit of the earth around the sun.

    Does any of that make sense?

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site