Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Were Short methods really Short?
    From: Greg Rudzinski
    Date: 2016 Aug 5, 20:20 -0700



    Dec A - Lat B = Inv A = Z  (apply +/- to 90° or 270°)

    You are probably looking at a first generation form with errors.

    Greg Rudzinski

    From: David C
    Date: 2016 Aug 5, 19:12 -0700

    The work sheet for Ageton Classic has entries for Prime Vertical calculations. The second of the calculations uses the formula for amplitude at rising 
    sin A = sin d * sec L.

    The worksheet (incorrectly I believe) describes the result as Z.

    On 17 July 2016 when L = S41° 06.5'  and  d = N21° 08.6'   Ageton Classic gives  Z=28° 36'.  An app gives the sun's azimuth at rising as 62.3° or 62° 18'.

    28°  36' +  62° 18'    = approx 90°.  Why the result is not exactly 90° is probably a thread in itself (unless I have made an error in my calclations).

    As a check, for Lat  41° and Dec 21° Table 27 in Bowditch gives amplitude = 28.3° or 28° 18'.

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site