Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Were Short methods really Short?
    From: John D. Howard
    Date: 2016 Aug 3, 09:43 -0700


    My question has been " How were the Haversign methods better or faster the the straight, Law of Cosine formula.?"

    Look at the beautiful Table of Log sin & cosine and the work sheet that Greg Rudzinski developed.  In the archive on Oct 27, 2015 called Ageton-Classic SR Table PDF.  It does not use Ageton's method of dividing the nav triangle into two right trangles - it only uses Ageton's table.  I think this method is as short and fast as any that Gary named , IMHO

    I think the haversign methods were a holdout from the time sight formuls/methods to get LAT.  I see no advantage of using haversigns or any of the " short methods" over the straight Log sine & cosine Law of Cosine formula.

    John H.

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site