Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Were Short methods really Short?
    From: David C
    Date: 2016 Aug 3, 20:15 -0700

    I am a little confused about the Ageton methods. I have searched the forum and found several topics:


    Ageton Classic

    Classic Trig Log SR with Ageton

    I am guessing that that the methods are

    HO 211 1938  The original publication. (I have a copy)

    Ageton/Bayless, which in later editions included the Sadler technique. I do not know how this differs from 1938 Ageton.

    Ageton/Rudzinski which uses Ageton's tables but is a simpler method.

    Then there is Ageton Classic which to me means Ageton 1938 but the context suggests Ageton/Rudinski.

    Can someone please explain how the various methods fit together. In particular  what do I need to download to try the improved Ageton method that I have seen reference to.

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site