Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Was Earhart a Spy, Second spy theory
    From: Gary LaPook
    Date: 2010 May 24, 14:29 -0700

    I wrote before:
    
    
    "There have been many who have claimed that Earhart was on a spy mission 
    when she disappeared and have raised Earhart’s role in gathering 
    intelligence about Japan’s actions in the Mandated Islands. (I do wonder 
    however if any these theories were advanced prior to the 1943 Rosalind 
    Russell movie, Flight For Freedom, which had that story line.) I decided 
    to look at this from a piloting and aircraft performance point of view. 
    It turns out that there are actually two different theories. One, that 
    she was a spy herself, flying over the Japanese held Islands and taking 
    pictures of their installations with cameras hidden in her airplane. A 
    second theory is that she was not taking pictures herself but that she 
    would stage a disappearance to give the U.S. Navy the excuse to search 
    the Mandated Islands so that the Navy could take pictures of Japanese 
    installations. We need to look at these two different theories separately. "
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
    
    
    
    Now lets look at the second theory, that she was to stage her own 
    disappearance to give the U.S. Navy a justification to search throughout 
    the Japanese Mandated Islands. Let's see if this would have worked by 
    looking at it from the flight navigation point of view.
    
    The distance from Lae to Howland is 2556 statute miles and the course is 
    078 degrees true (image 6.) ( I state all courses in relationship to 
    true north instead of magnetic north, true directions, not magnetic 
    directions and distances are in statute miles.) Images 12, 13 & 14 show 
    the courses to Truk, Ponape and Jaluit. (I am not considering Palau 
    since it is so far off course.) The course to Truk is 18 degrees meaning 
    the plane would have to be 60 degrees off course to get to the vicinity 
    of that island. The course to Ponape is 38 degrees, off course by 40 
    degrees. To Jaluit is 60 degrees, 18 degrees off course.
    
    Another way to look at this is to see how many miles off course they 
    would be if they were in the vicinity of those islands. Image 15 shows 
    the perpendicular distances from the course to Howland to the various 
    islands. Truk is 910 miles off course, Ponape is 770 and Jaluit is 580.
    
    The commonly accepted level of uncertainty of in-flight dead reckoning 
    is 10% of the distance flown. So even without a navigator on board and 
    with Earhart doing her own dead reckoning navigation, just holding a 
    heading based on correcting for the forecast winds, and with no fixes in 
    flight, no celestial fixes and no visual fixes over an island, she 
    should not have been off course more than 255.6 SM either to the north 
    or to the south of Howland. Image 16 illustrates the area she might have 
    been expected to overfly on her way to Howland if using just dead 
    reckoning. It extends 255 miles north of Howland which is about 6 
    degrees off the course to Howland. (A like area would be south of course 
    but that is not important to this discussion.) Even though the area of 
    course uncertainty extends 6 degrees either side of course, you are more 
    likely to be closer to the course line than to the edges of the area. 
    The probability drops off gradually as you move further away from the 
    course line. With a navigator on board, obtaining celestial fixes fairly 
    regularly, the plane should be very close to the course line and it is 
    unlikely that it was ever near the edge of the area of course uncertainty.
    
    Image 17 shows how far off course in excess of the area of course 
    uncertainty it would be to go to the islands. Since the course 
    uncertainty is 6 degrees these numbers are six degrees less than the 
    previous numbers, 54 degrees to Truk, 34 to Ponape and 12 to Jaluit.
    
    The 10% area of uncertainty expands in the along course dimension too. 
    Even though the airplane (using dead reckoning) may have flown through 
    the course uncertainty area it is not going to be near the western end 
    of it since they flew through that area many hours prior to the last 
    transmission. The plane is not likely to be more than 255 miles short of 
    Howland nor likely to be more than 255 miles past Howland. Image 18 
    shows the final area of uncertainty (with the area south of the course 
    line omitted. It would be the same size as the area north of the course 
    line.) Like the uncertainty in the course, the plane is more likely to 
    be near the center than near any of the edges. Again, with a navigator 
    on board, the uncertainty would be much less.
    
    Image 19 shows the line from Jaluit to the nearest corner of the final 
    area of uncertainty. This distance is 670 SM. It is slightly less to 
    Mili, 530 miles. It is 1460 to Ponape and 1880 to Truk.
    
    The Japanese also understood navigation. It would be very difficult to 
    convince them of a legitimate need to search near Truk, 1880 miles from 
    the outer limits of her likely position or even to search near Mili, 
    fully 530 miles away. To put this into perspective, image 20 shows an 
    analogous situation projected onto the U.S. If I were to disappear while 
    flying my plane from Los Angeles to New York my family would have a very 
    hard time convincing the police chief of New Orleans to make a search 
    for my plane in the swamps nearby. New Orleans is 780 miles off course, 
    about the same as Ponape.
    
    Since the U.S. planners would have been aware that they would not be 
    able to pull the wool over the eyes of the Japanese, there is no reason 
    to believe that they would have attempted this deception.
    
    gl
    
    
    
    

    File:


    File:


    File:


    File:


    File:


    File:


    File:


    File:


    File:


    File:


       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site