
NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Visibility at rising and setting
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2000 Apr 25, 9:24 AM
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2000 Apr 25, 9:24 AM
The May issue of the UK magazine Practical Boat Owner carries a short article entitled "sights without a sextant" by Alastair Buchan. This suggests that you can make worthwhile astro observations of Sun or Moon, perhaps even stars and planets, to obtain a position line without a sextant, by timing the moment at which they are tangent to the horizon at rising or setting. There are well-known weaknesses in this approach, which I propose to write in to point out. However there is one claim made that goes way outside my own experience, and perhaps I can call on the collective wisdom of this mailing list for help. The author states "I've never tried it myself, but given a dark sky and a clear hard horizon, it should be possible to take horizon sights of stars and planets - although deciding when they're exactly at tangency may involve more of a guess than observation." Clearly, there's a special problem at rising, in that the star or planet is invisible before rising, and you have little idea beforehand just when and whre it's going to happen, so let's confine ourselves to settings. What I'm asking is whether any of you enjoys clear enough skies that they can observe stars or planets, even Venus at its brightest, right down to being able to time a sudden moment of extinction as it sets below the horizon. As a navigator in the waters of NW Europe, with its notably hazy horizons, I am rather at a disadvantage in this respect. I am somewhat sceptical that it is ever feasible elsewhere, but I look forward to receiving the comments of others. Presumably, one could be certain that the light from star or planet really was being intercepted by the now-dark horizon itself, if it were being occulted on and off a few times, by distant waves or slight swell, as it set, similar to observing a distant lighthouse. I am setting aside, for the moment, the unpredictability of the refraction correction which bedevils all low-altitude observations. Yours, George Huxtable ------------------------------ george@huxtable.u-net.com George Huxtable, 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK. Tel, or fax, to 01865 820222 or (int.) +44 1865 820222. ------------------------------