NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Vernier reading
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2007 Jan 7, 00:37 -0000
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2007 Jan 7, 00:37 -0000
Jim Martin wrote- | Sirs, | I have recently purchased an Heath&Co Vernier sextant?.The | Vernier has the usual 10' divisions,each with five 12"subdivisions.My | problem is, that there are three 12"divisions to the left of 10', and | three to right of 0'.What is the purpose for this?.Incidentally the | main arc reads to 150deg.,hence my query against the use of sextant.The | certificate is dated 1940 That method of division may be common, but not universal, even among Heath Vernier instruments. An alternative arrangement was to have six subdivisions to each minute on the Vernier, so the Vernier reads 10' along its length, divided to sixths of a minute, or 10". The main scale is divided, correspondingly, to sixths of a degree. The Vernier spans across a 20-degree arc on the main scale; perhaps a bit less on yours, because it's dividing into only 50 parts, not 60. I think the "5ths of a minute" method of division that you have came in when almanacs started to give angles to decimal parts of a minute, rather than in seconds. Then, it became awkward to adapt the reading from a "6ths of a minute" instrument, when calculating. Because zero on the Vernier is at its left-hand end, the main scale has to be extended (by at least 20 degrees in the case of my sextant, maybe by a bit less than that in yours) beyond the maximim measurable angle, to provide something to read the Vernier against. That explains why the scale goes to 150 degrees. You will find that it really is a sextant, not an quintant; there may be a few degrees extra, above 120, but not far above that the index arm will collide with the horizon mirror mounting. I suggest that the extra few divisions on the Vernier at each end may be to cope with the situation when measuring an angle that's nearly exactly on some multiple of 10', so very near one end of the Vernier or the other. If you thought it came near the top end of the Vernier, and had moved the magnifier there and got down to reading it, it would be a real nuisance to then find that the angle was just above the zero and had to shift to reading the other end. Those extra few divisions allow a bit of leeway in the overlap, but you have to be careful, off the end of the range of the Vernier, to record the correct main-scale reading that corresponds. George. contact George Huxtable at george@huxtable.u-net.com or at +44 1865 820222 (from UK, 01865 820222) or at 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---