Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: "Vernier acuity" of horizon IC tests
    From: Bill Morris
    Date: 2009 Jul 10, 03:28 -0700

    I hesitate to disagree with anyone about statistics, regarding it a kind of 
    intellectual glue that gums up my brain.
    Loosely speaking, isn't the standard error of the mean at a given level an 
    indicator of the  probability that the _mean_ lies within a specified range? 
    We would expect the distribution of the means to be smaller than the 
    distribution of the samples.
    I took n to be 30, rather than 30-1, as 30 seemed to qualify as a "large 
    sample." The 1.96 gives us exactly 95%, versus your 2 SD and 95.45% (in case 
    anyone is confused about where the figures come from).
    You seem to be writing about the probability that a given _observation_ lies within a specified range.
    Bill Morris
    New Zealand
    NavList message boards: www.fer3.com/arc
    Or post by email to: NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, email NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site