NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Venus
From: Bill B
Date: 2005 Dec 8, 18:34 -0500
From: Bill B
Date: 2005 Dec 8, 18:34 -0500
> The Nautical Almanac incorporates corrections for Venus' phases, so > if you use their ephemerides, etc, in your calculations, you should > be fine. Perhaps you ought to tell us why you're interested in the > diameter of Venus. Fred I am aware of the almanac corrections, but those are for altitude (up from the horizon). When shooting lunars with Venus recently, Venus can range from the same altitude as the moon to lower than the moon, so altitude corrections may not apply as the moon-as-horizon would split a different "side" of the partially illuminated sphere than a true horizon. If Frank's program does not take phase into account for Venus and I am splitting a body that has an apparent width of 10" instead of 40" (right side illuminated?), then my observation would be 15" off. As we move towards inferior conjunction Jan 13, Venus may become 60" or more in diameter, with the area illuminated diminishing. If not accounted for one way or another, we could be looking at an errors up to 1.0'. So apparent diameter, amount illuminated, and the angle of the illuminated portion would appear, IMHO, to be of concern. Bill
