NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Using star-star distances
From: Hewitt Schlereth
Date: 2008 Sep 24, 00:42 -0400
From: Hewitt Schlereth
Date: 2008 Sep 24, 00:42 -0400
Thanks for the fast response. I'll look around the net for Plastimo. Earlier I did find an outfit in France that sells Ebbco, but their list of spares did not include what I wanted. Further FWIWs: 1) My practice with the Ebbco was to check IE at the beginning and end of a round of sights and average. As a rule the result was around 1' IE. 2) One day I took morning and afternoon sun sights from the top of the Gibbs Hill Light in Bermuda with my Ebbco, my C. Plath and my vernier Davis. The resulting fixes were: 1 mile for the Plath, 2 miles for the Ebbco, 4 miles for the Davis. 3) On the two occasions I was able to compare my Plath results with a Satnav, one came out spot-on with the longitude and 2' different on the latitude. The next time (different boat) I was spot-on with the latitude and 2' different vis-a-vis the longitude. Hewitt On 9/23/08, frankreed@historicalatlas.netwrote: > > Hewitt S., you wrote: > "I'm trying to restore an Ebbco sextant. What I need is a set of shades and > the spring retainer for the horizon mirror or an entire horizon mirror > assembly. The model I have is the later one with the larger mirrors and > three index-mirror shades." > > > If you don't get any hits on this after a week, let me know. There are > several at Mystic Seaport (for classroom use, not in the collections) that > are in various states of repair, and it may be possible to cannibalize the > parts you need. > > > And you wrote: > "FWIW : I used an Ebbco for years and it always stayed true to the DR > and always got me there." > > > True to the DR meaning...? As long as the fix and the DR were not more than > perhaps five miles apart, you would have considered that acceptable, right? > So random errors even as large as +/-2 minutes (on top of inescapable > observation errors) would have been hard to detect in the pre-GPS era. > > Just so there's no misunderstanding, I always recommend plastic sextants to > people who want to do standard, basic LOP celestial navigation. But I would > note that I frequently find that the sorts of people who are interested in > celestial today are also interested in owning an instrument that they can be > proud of, and for reasons which are only partly rational, plastic sextants > don't make the cut. > > -FER > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc To post, email NavList@fer3.com To , email NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---