Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Using any star for a lunar
    From: George Huxtable
    Date: 2005 Apr 7, 00:45 +0100

    Bill wrote-
    
    >> For example, if you mark three arbitrary points on the equator,
    >> you obtain a triangle whose three angles are 180 deg each.
    >
    >Alex
    >
    >I am having trouble finding a frame of reference where I can imagine three
    >180d angles.  If I recall, Herbert or George also surmised it you example
    >might be considered a total of 180d.
    >
    >From my perspective, if I raise the center point just a hair off the equator
    >I would see a triangle.  The center angle close to 180d, and the other two
    >close to 0d.  Same if I raise and end point just a hair.
    >
    >How do I adjust my frame of reference to imagine three 180d angles in your
    >above example?
    >
    >Bill
    
    ==============
    
    Mark three points around the equator. Point A is at 0deg West, point B is
    at 120deg West, point C is at 240deg West. Join A to B, B to C, and C to A
    again, with great circles, going Westerly each time. Then you have three
    vertexes, each subtending a 180deg angle. The resulting triangle divides
    the circle into two equal halves
    
    You might object that with such a 180deg angle, then each vertex has become
    a straight line, not a corner. That's true, because it's a limiting case.
    Think about it, if you prefer, when the angle at A, B, and C is not quite
    (but as near as dammit) equal to 180, so there's a VERY obtuse angle at
    each corner. Then increase these angles, very slightly.
    
    This business of the "spherical excess" is quite new to me, but it seems to
    work. If we add the three "angles", each 180, we get 540 deg. The spherical
    excess over a tiny triangle, in which the angles always sum to 180deg, is
    therefore 360 deg, or 2pi radians. Multiply this by r squared, and we get 2
    pi r-squared, which is indeed the area of the half-sphere that the
    "triangle" embraces. Today, I've learned something new...
    
    George.
    
    ================================================================
    contact George Huxtable by email at george---.u-net.com, by phone at
    01865 820222 (from outside UK, +44 1865 820222), or by mail at 1 Sandy
    Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK.
    ================================================================
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site