Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Use of FER's Lunars Calculator [was : Lunar weather in Indiana]
    From: Alexandre Eremenko
    Date: 2012 Apr 2, 08:52 -0400

    Dear Kermit,
    To obtain a complete picture about Cook's observations,
    one has to read ALL my messages titled Point Venus.
    My first two messages on this subject contain some questions
    (something I was puzzled about), but the next messages solve
    most of those puzzles.
    
    I mean I was writing my messages in the process of
    doing this 
    research, and never submitted a final, edited version.
    
    Alex.
    
    On Mon, 1 Apr 2012, utf-8?Q?Antoine Cou=C3=ABtte?= wrote:
    
    >
    > Alex,
    >
    >
    >> What I would consider a useful improvement is adding more stars.
    >
    > I totally agree with you on this point. It is possible that Frank might have 
    developed an improved version with (many) more stars. But I do not recall 
    having read anything about this. Frank, are you here ?
    >
    > Another improvement could also be to adapt this Lunars Calculator to also 
    deal with Occultations by the Moon (simply enter Distance = 0). This would 
    definitely require adding many (many) more stars. While this Lunars 
    calculator is NOT advertised for Occultations, I have checked it for some 
    Occultations a few years back. I found that its results accuracy then was in 
    the +/- 0.2' range, which is slightly degraded when compared to "True 
    Lunars". As earlier indicated, for "True Lunars" (let's say with Body to Limb 
    Distances greater than 15?/20?, a value Frank will further correct if 
    necessary) I have observed that its overall accuracy always lies within +/- 
    0.07' in the 1750 - 2050 time span. One thing of importance though : 
    Occultations - even dealing with an ideally spherical Moon - are subject to 
    (sometimes highly) non-linear effects which can mislead "standard" Lunars 
    Algorithms otherwise extremely efficient to tackle Lunars. And also there 
    exist to-day some excellent Software dedicated to Occultations and/or 
    Eclipses.
    >
    >
    >>  At least my study of the accuracy of Cook's and some XIX century 
    observations gave meaningful results with Frank's calculator.
    >
    > Do you have the reference (if any) to some of your earlier posts in which 
    you commented Cook's Results Accuracy. This I have done too for some of them, 
    also using Google Earth to check actual coordinates.
    >
    >
    > Best Regards
    >
    > Kermit
    >
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------
    > NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
    > Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    > To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > : http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=118650
    >
    >
    >
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site