NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Use of FER's Lunars Calculator [was : Lunar weather in Indiana]
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2012 Apr 2, 08:52 -0400
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2012 Apr 2, 08:52 -0400
Dear Kermit, To obtain a complete picture about Cook's observations, one has to read ALL my messages titled Point Venus. My first two messages on this subject contain some questions (something I was puzzled about), but the next messages solve most of those puzzles. I mean I was writing my messages in the process of doing this research, and never submitted a final, edited version. Alex. On Mon, 1 Apr 2012, utf-8?Q?Antoine Cou=C3=ABtte?= wrote: > > Alex, > > >> What I would consider a useful improvement is adding more stars. > > I totally agree with you on this point. It is possible that Frank might have developed an improved version with (many) more stars. But I do not recall having read anything about this. Frank, are you here ? > > Another improvement could also be to adapt this Lunars Calculator to also deal with Occultations by the Moon (simply enter Distance = 0). This would definitely require adding many (many) more stars. While this Lunars calculator is NOT advertised for Occultations, I have checked it for some Occultations a few years back. I found that its results accuracy then was in the +/- 0.2' range, which is slightly degraded when compared to "True Lunars". As earlier indicated, for "True Lunars" (let's say with Body to Limb Distances greater than 15?/20?, a value Frank will further correct if necessary) I have observed that its overall accuracy always lies within +/- 0.07' in the 1750 - 2050 time span. One thing of importance though : Occultations - even dealing with an ideally spherical Moon - are subject to (sometimes highly) non-linear effects which can mislead "standard" Lunars Algorithms otherwise extremely efficient to tackle Lunars. And also there exist to-day some excellent Software dedicated to Occultations and/or Eclipses. > > >> At least my study of the accuracy of Cook's and some XIX century observations gave meaningful results with Frank's calculator. > > Do you have the reference (if any) to some of your earlier posts in which you commented Cook's Results Accuracy. This I have done too for some of them, also using Google Earth to check actual coordinates. > > > Best Regards > > Kermit > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList > Members may optionally receive posts by email. > To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > : http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=118650 > > >