Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Unistar Principle etc.
    From: Alexandre Eremenko
    Date: 2012 Apr 21, 12:03 -0700

    Dear Kermit,

    My own investigation of the Unistar Principle is the following.
    Sighting one star approximately in the direction of the target,
    permits you to adjust the horizontal direction. This is simple.

    And this essentially reduce the problem to the problem in one vertical
    plane. That is the missile, target, Earth center and star are
    in the same vertical plane. What you want to adjust is the
    missile velocity direction, using the star altitude.
    (The altitude of the missile over the sea level is supposed to be known,
    but the distance to the target and the direction of the vertical are
    not known exactly).

    In this vertical plane, I solve the Kepler problem (of motion of the missile)
    for given initial position and velocity. The orbit equation is explicit, and
    I write the condition that the orbit (an ellipse) hits the target.

    I obtain a condition of the form F(d,v)=0, where d is the distance
    to the target
    (this is an angle, measured in degrees), and v is the inclination
    of the velocity vector (also in degrees). F is in fact
    a polynomial of degree 4.

    Assuming that we know both d, and v aproximately, we can linearize this
    equation (similarly to the Sumner method).

    Now what does a star observed altitude give? It gives you d+v, independently
    of which star (in this plane) is sighted. If it could give you
    another prescribed linear function of the form av+cd, the result of the
    linearlization of the equation F(d,v)=0, then this would do the job exactly.
    Unfortunately, no star, in this plane or outside, can give you any other
    function than d+v.

    In other words, "in a given plane passing through the Earth center and the target, if the
    sum of the distance to the target and your telescope
    inclination to the vertical are given, this already determines how the
    starry sky looks".

    This implies that more than one star will be redundant, that is the Unistar
    Princile is correct, and also implies that you cannot adjust exactly
    from any star sites. But you can adjust approximately, and apparently this works.

    Alex.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
    Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
    ----------------------------------------------------------------

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site