NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: UTM to lat/lon formulas
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2003 Dec 14, 21:56 +0000
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2003 Dec 14, 21:56 +0000
In the light of the corrections that appear to have been made to my copy of the Seidelmann "Explanatory supplement to the Ephemiris", I asked Herbert Prinz if I could confidently proceed to convert between lat/long and URL, using those corrected instructions. He answered- >Yes, but only if you get rid of R(phi1) in equation 4.233-8, as I suggested. >Otherwise you need the formula for R(phi) for finding the meridianal >curvature in >the footpoint. But as I said, >> R appears without explanation, in eq 4.233-14, as R1 in the special case >> for angle phi1 as- >> >> R1 = a * (1-Sqr(e)) / (1- Sqr(e) * Sqr(sin(phi1))) ^ (3/2), and surely, that's the curvature that's required for R1 in 4.233-8. So why couldn't I just calculate a value for R1 from that equaton, once phi1 has been calculated, and plug it into equation 4.233-8? In fact, I've done what Herbert suggested, and eliminated R1 from eq. 4.233-8. ==================== He added- >As long as we are at it, would you please check the following items in >your copy? > >On p. 400, equation 7.3-4. The correct formula is > > sin(HP) = R_Earth / r_Moon > >But in my copy the second member got turned around, yielding the >reciprocal value. In my later copy the equation is just as you have written it above, so the correction has been made. In addition (which you didn't mention) the r_Moon term has been enclosed between two vertical bars, as in a modulus sign, for some reason. > >On p.401, in equation 7.3-10, the semidiamer of the Moon is given as > > SD = arctan(R_Earth / r_Moon) > >but I believe this should be the arcsin, shouldn't it? I agree it should, but the difference is quite infinitesimal for such an angle, the ratio sin 0.25deg / tan 0.25 deg differing from 1 by only one part in a million. It hasn't been amended in Seidelmann. > >I also cannot resist drawing your attention to the index as well as to p. >485, where >one finds the term "analemmic curve". I consider this the most intriguing >coinage in >American technical literature of the 20th century. But this is another >story (and >one of my pet peeves). On that topic, you can find such a curve, taken by time-lapse photography of the Sun over a year, on the front cover of Jean Meeus' "Astronomical Tables of the Sun, Moon and planets", 2nd ed. George. ================================================================ contact George Huxtable by email at george@huxtable.u-net.com, by phone at 01865 820222 (from outside UK, +44 1865 820222), or by mail at 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK. ================================================================