Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: USCG Student Example for Low Altitude
    From: Marcel Tschudin
    Date: 2013 Apr 26, 11:04 +0300

    Kermit, you wrote: "... the refraction differences between US N.A. and
    French N.A. Tables reach 1 full arc-minute by 0� observed height."
    Does the French N.A. provide somewhere the information to which
    empirical formula the table values correspond to?
    
    You asked further: "... should the DIP correction be performed first,
    and then the Refraction correction, or the other way around ?"
    I presume that you have on one side your observed Hs which is related
    to your apparent horizon and on the other side your table values
    (inclusive the astronomical refraction values) which are related to
    the astronomical horizon (=horizontal line at observer). In order to
    use in this situation the table values you have to relate your
    measured height (Hs) first to the astronomical horizon; for this you
    have to detuct also first the dip from Hs.
    
    Marcel
    
    
    On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Antoine Cou�tte
     wrote:
    > ________________________________
    >
    > RE :
    > http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx/USCG-Student-Example-for-Low-Altitude-Rudzinski-apr-2013-g23682
    >
    > Hello Greg,
    >
    >
    > Thanks for this example.
    >
    > From your chart, I can guess that for your published Azimuth of 077.5� you
    > obtained an intercept (between GPS position itself and LOP) close to 0.8 NM
    > (A).
    >
    > I find i = - 1.4' (A) / AZ = 077�7
    >
    > Our intercept difference (close to 0.6') comes from a difference in the
    > Value of Refraction (the SUN is at quite a low height). As an example, the
    > refraction differences between US N.A. and French N.A. Tables reach 1 full
    > arc-minute by 0� observed height.
    >
    > Best Regards
    >
    > Kermit
    >
    > AN INTERESTING QUESTION (Any reply anybody ?)
    >
    > As the differences between both end results can be appreciable at such low
    > altitudes, should the DIP correction be performed first, and then the
    > Refraction correction, or the other way around ?
    >
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------
    > NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
    > Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    > To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    > View and reply to this message: http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=123696
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site